Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Dept. de Fitotecnia, Ctra. México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, 56230 Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.
Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus San Luis Potosí, Salinas de Hidalgo, 78600 San Luis Potosí, Mexico.
Grupo Interdisciplinario de Investigación de Sechium edule en México (GISeM), 56153 Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Dept. de Fitotecnia, Ctra. México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, 56230 Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.
Universidad Autónoma Chapingo, Dept. de Fitotecnia, Ctra. México-Texcoco, Km 38.5, 56230 Texcoco, Estado de México, Mexico.
|
Abstract The Sechium P. Br. genus composed of 11 species, which originated from the mountainous regions of Mesoamerica, have been domesticated and diversified. These species are clustered in two large groups: the Mexican clade and the Central American clade. Morphological and molecular studies have shown that species of the Mexican clade are formed through interspecific hybridizations and genetic flow, with the exception of S. mexicanum, which is strongly linked to the genus Sicyos. The objective of this review was to analyze the phylogenetics of Sechium based on morphological and molecular studies, which contributed to taxonomic knowledge and utilization, thereby favoring its conservation and improvement. The Central American clade is well supported with molecular data, but not so with morphological data. The species in this clade were geographically isolated and endemic. S. edule and S. tacaco are exploited species in the agricultural and industrial sectors, and both have an extensive genetic and phenotypic diversity that has allowed them to diversify and expand into different ecological niches. Finally, the Central American species of Sechium thrive in adverse environments of temperatures of mesophyll forest and high relative humidity, with characteristics that can give resistance to frosts and phytopathogenic agents, as well as cultivated species of this genus. Additional key words: genetic flow; hybridizations; genetic diversity; ecological niches; conservation; breeding Abbreviations used: AFLP (Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism); ETS (External Transcribed Spacer); ITS (Internal Transcribed Spacer); PCA (Principal Component Analysis). Authors’ contributions: LABG, JPLS, and JSC: data analysis and article writing. JCI: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors have read and approved the final article. Citation: Barrera-Guzmán, LA; Cadena-Iñiguez, J; Legaria-Solano, JP; Sahagún-Castellanos, J (2021). Phylogenetics of the genus Sechium P. Brown: A review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, Volume 19, Issue 1, e07R01. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021191-17036. Received: 08 Aug 2020. Accepted: 12 Feb 2021. Copyright © 2020 INIA. TThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-by 4.0) License. Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work. Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Correspondence should be addressed to Jorge Cadena-Iñiguez: jocadena@gmail.com |
|
CONTENTS Background of taxonomic classification |
Jeffrey (1966) reported for the first time that the botanical Cucurbitaceae family consists of about 700 species that were distributed in 90 genera. Currently, there are around 1000 accepted species included in 134 genera (The Plant List, 2010), among which the following genera are prominent due to their economic importance: Cucurbita, Cucumis, Citrullus, Luffa, Lagenaria, Momordica, Trichosanthes, Benincasa, and Coccinia; in these, 10 cultivated and domesticated species are of economic importance since they are cultivated in different parts of the world and are considered as main crops (Cucurbita argyrosperma, Cucurbita maxima, Cucurbita moshata, Cucurbita pepo, Citrullus lanatus, Benincasa hispida, Cucumis melo, Cucumis sativus, Lagenaria siceraria, and Momordica siceraria); 23 more are listed as crops of local importance and are cultivated, but some of them are not fully domesticated, including Sechium edule, which is particularly cultivated in various parts of the world as an introduced species (Chomicki et al., 2019). The Cucurbitaceae family is estimated to have originated on the Asian continent approximately 60 million years ago and later spread to other continents (Schaefer et al., 2009).
The genus Sechium P. Brown genus includes the following species: S. chinantlense Lira & F. Chiang, S. compositum (Donn. Sm) C. Jeffrey, S. edule (Jacq.) Swartz, S. hintonii (P.G. Wilson) C. Jeffrey, S. mexicanum Lira & Nee, S. panamensis (Wunderlin) Lira & F. Chiang, S. pittieri (Cogn.) C. Jeffrey, S. tacaco (Pittier) C. Jeffrey, S. talamancensis (Wunderlin) C. Jeffrey, S. venosum (L.D. Gómez) Lira & Chiang and S. villosum (Wunderlin) C. Jeffrey. These species originated, were domesticated and diversified in Mesoamerica (Newstrom, 1986, 1990, 1991; Lira & Chiang, 1992; Lira, 1995; Lira et al., 1997a; Lira & Nee, 1999; Cross et al., 2006).
The importance of the genus is based on the utilization of its morphological structures (fruits, roots, leaves) for dietary and medicinal purposes (Newstrom, 1990; Lira, 1995, 1996). Cucurbitacins, one of its chemical components, are tetracyclic terpenes present in Cucurbitaceae, and they confer a bitter flavor on its morphological structures and show antitumor activity against several types of cancer (Zhou et al., 2019). The fruits of S. edule have been studied with greater accuracy due to their alcoholic compounds possessing anti-neoplastic properties (Monroy-Vázquez et al., 2009; Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2013b; Aguiñiga-Sánchez et al., 2015, 2017; Salazar-Aguilar et al., 2017).
The S. edule and S. tacaco species are the most exploited of their genus in the agricultural sector. In particular, the populations of the first species show great phenotypic and genotypic variability, which is the product of the effects of domestication and interaction with the environment, and have been grouped into varietal complexes through secondary morpho-biochemical, stable and heritable characteristics, thereby differentiating each group. Some of the characteristics are the color, shape, texture, f lavor, bromatological content of the fruits (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2008, 2011; Cadena-Iñiguez & Arévalo-Galarza, 2011), genetic diversity (Machida-Hirano et al., 2015) and cytogenetic structure (Palacios, 1987; Mercado et al., 1993; De Donato & Cequea, 1994; Olvera-Vázquez et al., 2019).
The remaining nine species of the genus Sechium have been briefly described in terms of morphology and ecogeography. Some Central American species (S. talamancensis, S. panamensis, S. pittieri, S. venosum, S. villosum and S. tacaco) have agronomic characteristics that can be transferred to cultivated chayote (Lira, 1995). The recognition of wild ancestors or crop-related species is of vital importance in undertaking genetic improvement programs. However, morphological divergences between wild and cultivated species can cause taxonomic problems due to the existence of plesiomorphic and apomorphic states. The ribosomal and plastid DNA sequences have low mutation rates and are free of selection (Patwardhan et al., 2014), and their study has made people aware of the events of speciation, domestication, diversif ication and hybridization, which have helped to improve the taxonomy of species (Sanjur et al., 2002; Smýkal et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2017).
Understanding the phylogenetic characteristics of species is important for crop improvement. In general, wild species have extensive genetic variability, enabling them to adapt and survive in the face of adverse environmental impacts (Doebley et al., 1987; EL-Bakatoushi & Ahmed, 2018; Gao et al., 2018). Genes of interest can be transmitted to cultured populations using different improvement methods or genetic engineering techniques; however, the success of the incorporation of new genes depends on the phylogenetic proximity between species, thereby ensuring that the progeny are fertile and stable over time (Patwardhan et al., 2014).
By analyzing the chloroplast genes ribulose biphosphate carboxylase large chain (rbcL), maturase-K (matK), trnL and trnL-F and rpl20-rps12 intergenic spacers in 240 species from 114 genera of the Cucurbitaceae family in conjunction with a parsimony-based biogeographic analysis to determine vicarious and dispersal events, Asia was found to be the most likely center of origin for lineages in cucurbits and was gradually distributed to the rest of the continents through transoceanic dispersions (Schaefer et al., 2009).
Linguistic evidence, the endemism of most Sechium species, the morphological diversity they present, and the existence of wild populations suggest that all 11 Sechium species originated and were diversified and domesticated in Mesoamerica (Newstrom, 1990, 1991; Lira & Chiang, 1992; Lira, 1995; Lira et al., 1997b; Lira & Nee, 1999; Cross et al., 2006; Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2008, 2011, Avendaño-Arrazate et al., 2012, 2017). In Mexico and Guatemala, the S. edule, S. mexicanum, S. compositum, S. chinantlense and S. hintonii species are most prominent; in Central America, the following species are found: S. panamensis, S. talamancensis, S. venosum, S. villosum, S. pittieri and S. tacaco. Most Central American species have high degrees of endemism, in which the altitudinal factor influences the characteristics of the ecological niche where each of them develops (Wunderlin, 1976; Lira, 1995; Lira et al., 1999; Lira & Nee, 1999). The fruits, roots and leaves of Sechium are widely used in gastronomy (Newstrom, 1990; Lira, 1995) due to the contribution of water, vitamins, sugars, minerals, fiber and carbohydrates (Aung et al., 1990; Lira, 1996; Islam et al., 2018); otherwise, fruits are also used in the industry for the elaboration of flour used in pig meal (Lalthansanga & Samanta, 2015) and as a source of endothelin, which is a powerful vasoconstrictor and mitogen that can be used as a skin-whitening agent (Okamoto et al., 2008).
S. edule. It is the most representative species of the Sechium genus due to its agricultural importance, and is known as “chayote”, which is a word originally from the Nahuatl term huizt ayotl (spiny squash), later chayotl and presently chayote. The broad morphological and genetic wealth of S. edule in southeastern Mexico and Guatemala, in addition to the presence of S. compositum, which is a highly related wild species, indicates that chayote was domesticated in the region of Chiapas-Oaxaca, Mexico (Newstrom, 1991).
Cadena-Iñiguez et al. (2011) studied eight populations of S. edule (seven cultivated and one wild) from Veracruz, Mexico. Biochemical studies have shown that the wild accession synthesizes a greater quantity of chlorophyll and cucurbitacins with respect to the cultivated populations; principal component analysis (PCA) separated chayote populations by color, texture, and secondary metabolite content. Using the same populations as S. edule, Cadena-Iñiguez et al. (2008) evaluated them via 27 morphological variables of leaves, flowers and fruits. The PCA for the first component was tilted for the variables of leaf shapes, trichomes, fruit color, flower size and color, petiole color, and vein structure; while for component two, a greater variation was obtained for the characteristics of the fruit (length, width and height). A cladistic analysis based on morphology and anatomy showed that the wild population was the most remote but most likely ancestor of cultivated chayotes. The bitter flavor of the fruits is a characteristic of the wild populations of cucurbits, in which Yuan et al. (2016) compared the cucumber, melon and watermelon genomes, thereby finding a group of genes that regulate the synthesis of cucurbitacins and that due to domestication and selection; therefore, wild populations can significantly reduce the bitterness of their fruits.
Castro et al. (2015) evaluated the morphological and biochemical diversity of seven cultured S. edule accessions in Spain. The length of the fruit had an interval of 9.2-13.1 cm, as Cadena et al. (2008) reported an upper limit interval of 3-15 cm, in which other variables such as fruit weight and seed morphometry were also affected by fruit length. However, Castro et al. (2015) found a great diversity in the color of the fruit, from light green to dark green; on the other hand, Castro et al. (2015) obtained an average of 2.27 ºBrix, which was relatively low compared to that of Cadena et al. (2011), who obtained values higher than 10 ºBrix, which is due to the presence of chayotes with yellow fruits that tend to have a slightly sweet flavor.
Chayote is an introduced crop in India, but with indices of morphological diversity. Jain et al. (2017) evaluated 36 native S. edule accessions with 18 fruit-related morphological markers and 97 polymorphic bands obtained from DAMD-type markers. The PCA results are similar to those obtained by Cadena-Iñiguez et al. (2008), given that the main components give greater variation to the characteristics of the fruit, but not so due to the morphology in f lowers and leaves, where Cadena-Iñiguez et al. (2008) found a variation. Verma et al. (2017) also found moderate genetic diversity in 74 chayote varieties in the North Eastern Hill region of India with ISSR and RAPD-like molecular markers; on the other hand, those varieties of dark green color showed the highest content of phenols and vitamin C, and are recommended for selection and hybridization.
Abdelnour & Rocha (2008) evaluated the biochemical diversity with isoenzymes in 42 S. edule accessions native to Costa Rica, and found that 57% of the 14 loci were polymorphic; 24 accessions were heterozygous for a single locus, and the others had polymorphisms at two or three loci. Avendaño-Arrazate et al. (2012) reported 59.8% polymorphism in 27 cultivated S. edule populations and three wild isoenzyme populations; populations of S. edule with dark green fruits and spines were found to have the highest observed and expected heterozygous values; even so, the observed average heterozygosity was low (0.05). The highest genetic variation was found by isoenzymatic analysis in materials with dark green fruits. Therefore, isoenzymes are currently not recommended for genetic diversity studies since their expression is regulated by the environment and the results may be distorted.
The recalcitrant nature of S. edule seeds prevents their timely conservation, making it difficult to obtain archaeological records that allow delving into themes related to their origin. However, through ethno-historical and linguistic techniques (Guevara et al., 2014), it has been determined that the Aztecs used and cultivated chayote (Newstrom, 1991; Lira, 1996). Since it is the Sechium species with the highest degree of domestication in a region with high ecogeographic and cultural diversity such as Mexico, varietal complexes have been formed within the species that differ primarily in the physiological, chemical and anatomical characteristics related to the fruits (Cadena-Iñiguez & Arévalo-Galarza, 2011). The highest degree of observed heterozygosity was found in materials with an intense green color and with spines, which are prominent characteristics of wild materials (Avendaño-Arrazate et al., 2012).
The fruits of the wild populations of S. edule tend to have a bitter flavor and high concentrations of cucurbitacins, and are rich in ethyl acetate to capture free radicals (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2011; Riviello-Flores et al., 2018). These chemical compounds have anti-neoplastic properties and apoptosis inducers in cancer cells, and can inhibit the metastatic process of lung cancer (Shukla et al., 2016). The alcoholic extracts of the varietal complexes of chayote and their improved genotypes H-378 (S. edule amarus silvestrys × S. edule var. virens levis 290) and Perla negra (S. edule var. nigrum minor × S. edule var. amarus silvestrys) (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2013a) have shown positive results in cancerous cell lines such as L929 (mice lung fibrosarcoma), HeLa (human cervical carcinoma) and P-388 (mice leukemia macrophages), with the peculiarity of having minimal negative effects on normal cells (Monroy-Vázquez et al., 2009; Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2013b; Aguiñiga-Sánchez et al., 2015, 2017; Salazar-Aguilar et al., 2017).
The alcoholic extracts of S. edule decrease levels of agents related to coronary heart disease and significantly increase high-density cholesterol levels (Neeraja et al., 2015). The dried fruit powder of S. edule var. nigrum spinosum has significant effects in reducing oxidative stress, which helps combat metabolic syndrome problems in older adults (Rosado-Pérez et al., 2019); otherwise, alcoholic extracts of S. edule from roots and fruits have reducing effects on blood pressure (Lombardo-Earl et al., 2014; Fauziah et al., 2019); they also act as regulators of blood glucose levels (Maity et al., 2013; Martiar, 2017), protectors of the gastrointestinal mucosa (Sateesh et al., 2012), and have antibacterial activity against the gram-negative Escherichia coli ATCC 8739, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 3224 and Shigella flexneri ATCC 12022 (Kalpana et al., 2013); just to cite some examples of its many applications.
Concerning breeding to increase the content of cucurbitacins, which confer bitter flavor both to leaves and to fruits, two genes, bi-1, and Bt-1 have been found to be involved. From a set of 2416 pairs of SSR primers developed from the sequencing of the cucumber genome (Cucumis sativus L.) (Ren et al., 2009), Zhang et al. (2013) used QTL analysis to study 149 RIL´s produced by the crossing of the inbred lines 9110Gt (P1) and 9930P (P2) of cucumber to detect molecular markers linked to bitter f lavor in fruits and leaves. In this way, it can possibly be detected that the bi (bi-1) and Bt (Bt-1) genes are linked and confer bitter flavour to the aforementioned structures. These genes were found on chromosomes 5 and 6 of the cucumber and could have an application to be detected in other genera of the family since it belongs to the same botanical family. The classical breeding methods, based on selection and hybridization between the species S. compositum, S. chinantlense, and varietal complexes of S. edule, have produced improved varieties and hybrids for human consumption and pharmaceutical potential due to their high content of cucurbitacin (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2013a; Avendaño-Arrazate et al., 2014).
S. compositum. Its geographic distribution is from Chiapas in Mexico to Central American countries such as Guatemala. It can develop up to an altitude of 2100 m, allowing it to grow in humid environments, such as mesophyll and tropical forests. Newstrom (1990, 1991) described it as the wild species closest to S. edule, despite having different chromosome numbers [(S. compositum n = 14) (Lira et al., 2009) (S. edule n = 12, 13 and 14) (Palacios, 1987; Mercado et al., 1993; De Donato & Cequea, 1994)] and because it has the singularity of not having an apical fissure, which is a characteristic that can be used as an object of selection (Lira, 1995) or isolation.
S. chinantlense. This is limited to northern Oaxaca, Mexico, with an altitude below 800 m. It develops in high or medium evergreen forests, and in mesophyll and deciduous forests. S. chinantlense is related to S. edule and S. compositum, which is why its conservation is necessary to understand the evolutionary processes of cultivated species (Lira, 1995; Lira et al., 1999).
Taxonomic studies of palynology by Lira et al. (1994) showed that the qualitative physical characteristics of the pollen grains (thorny and covered grains) of S. chinantlense belong to the Siciynae subtribe and share certain characteristics with the rest of the Sechium species; however, the absence of an analysis of variance makes it difficult to observe the presence/absence of significant differences.
S. hintonii. It has a restricted distribution in Temascaltepec (Mexico State), and in the southern state of Guerrero (Mexico). It thrives in a limited altitude range, fluctuating between 1300 and 1500 m in deciduous tropical forests and live oak forests (Lira, 1995). Recently, it has been collected from the mesophyll forest of Veracruz at an altitude of 1340 m in the germplasm bank of the Grupo Interdisciplinario de Investigación en Sechium edule en México (GISeM).
S. mexicanum. This species is endemic to Mexico and is found in the states of Hidalgo, Puebla, Querétaro and Veracruz. It develops at altitudes of 900-2300 m in mesophyll, oak, and pine forests (Lira & Nee, 1999). Molecular studies suggest that this species should be relocated to another genus, and Sicyos seems to be the closest (Cross et al., 2006; Sebastian et al., 2012).
S. tacaco. This species is totally restricted throughout the Talamanca mountain range, Costa Rica, at altitudes of 1000-1700 m, and is locally known as “tacaco” (Wunderlin, 1976). There exist cultivated and semi-cultivated populations of this species in San José, Costa Rica, where their fruits are exploited as vegetables to make regional dishes (Lira, 1995). Morales (1994) studied the vegetative and reproductive morphology of S. tacaco, and found similarities with S. edule in the anatomical structure of plant organs, multicellular trichomes, structure of floral nectaries, and the presence of anomocytic stomata in vegetative and reproductive organs. Lira (1995) emphasized the low morphological diversity of S. tacaco fruits, except for the presence/absence of spines and the amount of fiber; however, in a recent study, Monge & Loría (2017) described morphologically five varieties of S. tacaco in geographically distant localities, although at similar average altitudes of 1100 m, thereby finding diversity and significant differences in the characteristics of the fruit (weight, length, width). The most important findings of Monge & Loría (2017) were found in the report of tacaco fruits with 6-7 complete longitudinal sutures and 2-5 incomplete longitudinal sutures, which provided new information to elucidate evolutionary processes at the level of species and Sechium genus.
S. panamense. This species is endemic to Panama, where it develops at altitudes that fluctuate between 1500 and 3000 m. Its botanical description is only based on the four samples collected, so it is necessary to intensify its search to find the variation and possible hybridizations that will contribute to its study. Its adaptation to cold climates makes it ideal to become incorporated into genetic improvement programs, which would help induce its search and research (Lira, 1995).
S. talamancense. Also known as “chayotillo” and “tacaquillo”, S. talamancensis is endemic as S. tacaco to the Talamanca mountain range in Costa Rica. It is found in the cloud (mesophyll) forest at altitudes of 2400 to 3200 m. Due to the low temperatures where it thrives, it could be useful in the transfer of genes to improve frost-resistant cultivated materials (Lira, 1995).
S. venosum. This species is endemic to the Caribbean coast of Costa Rica and is very similar to S. hintonii in terms of its pendular inflorescences. It adapts perfectly to conditions with a high degree of moisture (Lira, 1995), suggesting that its genetic structure is resistant to attack by fungal diseases, which are the main problems in cultivated species of Sechium (Olguín-Hernández et al., 2013) and one of the most significant approaches in the genetic improvement of species with agricultural importance (Newstrom, 1990; Moncayo-Pérez et al., 2020).
S. villosum. This species is endemic to Costa Rica, and thrives in disturbed environments of tropical or mesophyll forests, at altitudes of 1500-2000 m. Similar to S. venosum, it develops in humid environments, which could be a source of genes for resistance to fungal-related diseases (Lira, 1995).
S. pittieri. This species is distributed from Nicaragua to Costa Rica, where it can be consumed as a vegetable. Its phenotypic and genetic plasticity allows it to adapt in diverse environments with a broad altitudinal range that covers up to 2500 m, which can be synonymous with S. pittieri, possibly having a wide range of genetic diversity, and can also be used as S. talamancensis and S. panamensis to improve cultivated species (Lira, 1995).<
Jeffrey (1978) described seven species of Sechium and grouped them into two sections (Sechium and Frantzia) based on the characteristics of their floral nectaries. The anthers of the Sechium section (S. compositum, S. edule, S. hintonii and S. talamancense) are generally free, which confers on them a plesiomorphic state, while in Frantzia (S. pittieri and S. villosum), the anthers are totally fused, indicating an apomorphic characteristic; this is possibly the reason for describing these two sections for Sechium.
Newstrom (1986, 1991) only considered three species of Sechium (S. compositum, S. edule and S. hintonii) and, like Jeffrey (1978), did not include S. chinantlense within this group. Newstrom decided to group the rest of the Central American species in the Polakowskia and Frantzia genera (S. tacaco, S. talamancense, S. pittieri, S. panamense, S. venosum and S. villosum); these two genera are currently found to be unaccepted or unresolved (The Plant List, 2010). In the studies by Lira & Chiang (1992), Lira (1996), Lira et al. (1997a,b; 1999), Lira & Nee (1999), the Sechium genus was divided into the Sechium (S. compositum, S. chinantlense, S. edule, S. hintonii, S. tacaco and S. talamancense) and Frantzia (S. mexicanum, S. panamense, S. pittieri, S. venosum and S. villosum) sections. The cultivated species S. edule was included in the Sechium section, as well as the wild species closest to it (S. compositum, S. chinantlense and S. hintonii); the semi-domesticated Central American species S. tacaco and S. talamancensis, which are phylogenetically close species, were also added. Cross et al. (2003, 2006) only grouped in Sechium the species of the Mexican clade (S. compositum, S. chinantlense, S. edule and S. hintonii).
Lira et al. (1997b) studied ten species of Sechium and 11 of the Sicynae subtribe using numerical taxonomy of 62 quantitative and qualitative characters, corresponding to the palynology and general morphology of plants. In cluster analysis, the ten Sechium species are well differentiated from the others; however, within the Sechium group, no congruence was observed regarding the classification of Jeffrey (1978). S. pittieri and S. villosum (Sechium section Frantzia) are separated by a considerable Euclidean distance. In the PCA, the characteristics of the flowers and fruits were the ones with the greatest variation, and the grouping pattern does not support the classification elaborated by Newstrom (1986) (Sechium sensu strict without sections, Polakowskia 'sensu lato' and Frantzia strict); thus, this analysis manages to separate the Sechium species into two geographic groups (Mexico and Central America).
The wild populations of S. edule reside mainly in the states of Veracruz and Oaxaca, but with potentially suitability potential in Querétaro, Hidalgo and Puebla. Newstrom (1991) claimed that the wild population of Oaxaca type I wild chayotes was highly homogeneous in its fruit, regardless of its shape, dark green color and high density of spines; on the other hand, he named the population of Veracruz as type II wild chayotes for having phenotypic ranges in the characteristics of the aforementioned fruits. In both classifications, the fruits are bitter and fibrous. However, Lira et al. (1999) decided to group them as S. edule spp., with edule for cultivated chayotes and S. edule spp. sylvestris (wild chayotes types I and II), was nominated as the most probable ancestors.
Morphological markers were used in the first three classifications of the Sechium species. As mentioned earlier, morphological structures undergo changes through natural and artificial selection, thereby making it difficult to identify the species through the state of plesiomorphic and apomorphic traits (Kück & Wägele, 2016). The crosses and hybridizations between species of Sechium can also lead to taxonomic problems. However, many of the samples from the wild subspecies have a high probability of being the product of breeding with other species of the genus, which has been widely proven in the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) and External Transcribed Spacer (ETS) studies by Cross et al. (2006), where wild samples of S. edule are grouped with S. chinantlense, S. compositum and particularly with S. hintonii.
The phylogenetic origin of Sechium has several aspects, depending on the type and analysis of the data. The conclusions of Lira et al. (1997a) were subjected to discussion through molecular studies by Cross et al. (2006) when analyzing ITS and ETS sequences in 42 species of the Sicynae subtribe (Rytidostylis carthaginesis, Microsechium helleri, Parasicyos dieterleae, three Sechiopsis species, 27 Sechium accessions represented by S. chinantlense, S. compositum, the two subspecies of S. edule, S. hintonii, S. mexicanum, S. pittieri, S. tacaco, S. talamancense, S. villosum and nine species of Sicyos). The heuristic and maximum parsimony methods do not demonstrate that the Mexican species of Sechium are the same species (S. chinantlense, S. compositum, S. edule, S. hintonii); on the other hand, S. mexicanum was grouped with Sicyos, a genus that in turn is closely related to Sechium. These ITS and ETS sequence data do not provide sufficient information about the phylogeny of the Mexican Sechium species, except for the well-supported Central American species. The consensus tree of Cross et al. (2006) contains many polytomies, thereby making it difficult to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of Sechium due to the probable rapid evolution of these species. However, the molecular clock test calculated using a penalized likelihood estimation approach and fossil data from Sicyos, suggests that Sechium species diverged in the Pleistocene, and climatic f luctuations led the species to be genetically isolated and differentiated between interglacial periods.
Cross et al. (2006) obtained 453 Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) markers for 127 individuals from S. edule spp. edule, 21 of S. edule spp. sylvestris, 20 from S. chinantlense and 10 from S. compositum. The philogram obtained by the neighbor-joining method suggests that the S. edule spp. sylvestris does not form a monophyletic group, which is similar to the classification made in 1986, since the geography of these accessions is related to the states of Oaxaca and Veracruz with their respective forms of cultivated chayote; for example, some AFLP were exclusive of S. chinantlense and populations of S. edule spp. sylvestris from Oaxaca, thus opening the possibility of gene flow between these species. Analysis of molecular variance suggests that only 7% of the variation occurs between species, 57% between populations and 36% within individuals. The high number of sampled populations may be responsible for the greater variation between populations.
The chromosome number of S. edule has been studied and reported by various authors, and the results of each author differ considerably. Palacios (1987) reported n = 12 for S. edule from Veracruz; Mercado et al. (1993) n = 13 for S. edule from Oaxaca; De Donato & Cequea (1994) report n = 14 in six variants of S. edule. These differences may be due to a process called dysploidy, where there are meiotic mutations that cause chromosomal translocations without losing or gaining the genome, although it can change the chromosome sets and lead to subsequent speciation events (De Storme & Mason, 2014).
Although these three species have different chromosomal loads, it seems that intraspecific hybridization between them is possible. AFLP study can partially explain the questioning of different chromosome numbers in the subspecies of S. edule, as proposed by Lira (1999). Dysploidy may play an important role in interspecific crosses, chromosome number, and progeny stability.
Sebastian et al. (2012) studied the sequences of the rbcL and trnL genes, the trnS-trnG intergenic spacers, rpl20-rps12, psbA-trnH and the ITS region of the ribosomal DNA in 112 representative accessions of 87 species of Sicyoeae, including the 11 species of Sechium. The objective of this work is to study the phylogeny and biogeography of the Sicyos species. The maximum likelihood phylogram using the GTR + Γ model, as shown by Sebastian et al. (2012), managed to separate the Sechium species into two large clades; however, like Cross et al. (2006), S. mexicanum does not cluster in either of these two clusters, and is more related to the Sicyos species. Despite being a molecular study, it does not agree with the taxonomic classification of Lira (1996), Lira & Nee (1999), Lira & Chiang (1992) and Lira et al. (1999), since S. tacaco and S. talamancense do not belong to the Sechium group section Sechium; hence, S. mexicanum should not be grouped with Central American species (Sechium section Frantzia). The phylogram of Sebastian et al. (2012) does not present polytomies and the Sechium sensu stricto group (S. compositum, S. chinantlense, S. edule and S. hintonii) described by Cross et al. (2006); in this case, S. chinantlense and S. edule represent the most recent divergence event with a million years, followed by S. compositum and S. hintonii with 1.9 and 4.9 million years, respectively; however, stronger evidence is still required to ensure that S. compositum or S. hintonii were the direct ancestors or participants in the formation of wild populations of S. edule. Populations of S. chinantlense adapted to tropical conditions were moved to conditions of higher altitude, such as pine and oak forests, which might have originated in isolated populations in mountainous regions of the states of Veracruz and Hidalgo, Mexico, and these geographic barriers aided genetic differentiation between populations of S. edule (Cross et al., 2006).
Regarding the Central American clade, the most recent divergent species are S. pittieri and S. villosum, with approximately five hundred thousand years. The oldest species within the clade is S. venosum, with a history of over 7.4 million years, followed by S. talamancensis and S. panamensis (Sebastian et al., 2012). These three mentioned species adapt to the low temperatures in the mountainous zones of Costa Rica and Panamá. Although the Central American clade has hardly been studied, its species have important characteristics that can contribute to the genetic improvement of cultivated species (Lira, 1995), either through interspecific breeding or through more sophisticated methods of genetic engineering.
Molecular data can function as a tool in the taxonomic classification of species. In this context, S. mexicanum has problems of being grouped in the two clades of Sechium, thereby having more affinity with species of the genus Sicyos (Cross et al., 2006; Sebastian et al., 2012). Further studies and reassessments are needed to correctly assign and classify S. mexicanum. However, until the date of the divergence of the Sechium genus, the most ancient species of the genus has been taken as a reference; in this case, S. mexicanum, which began to diverge approximately 15 million years ago in the Cenozoic era (Sebastian et al., 2012) (Fig. 1).
In the Mexican clade, S. edule, S. compositum and S. chinantlense were close to each other, indicating recent periods of divergence during the Pleistocene era, characterized by glacier periods; however, there were also inter-glacier periods when the sun’s rays provided a warmer climate (Fig. 2). These thermal fluctuations triggered the species to contract and expand. During the expansion period, there was gene flow, introgression and hybridization between species, which led to great diversification (Ikeda et al., 2012); during the contraction period, the species were isolated and this led to peripatric speciation or in situ diversification, originating from endemic species (Nevado et al., 2018). In this case, S. chinantlense and S. compositum seem to have undergone hybridization with populations of S. edule and were then geographically isolated as they are generally found in restricted zones. The collections of Mexican chayote have been performed in mountainous regions (GISeM, 2015), which stand out for having physiographic and climatic wealth that allows the diversification of species and cause divergence through adaptive specialization, just like the emergence of varietal chayote complexes (Cadena-Iñiguez et al., 2007, 2008, 2011). In the Central American clade, S. villosum and S. pittieri represent the most recent divergence event, and in contrast, S. venosum is considered the oldest species (Fig. 3).
The taxonomic studies of Jeffrey, Lira and Newstrom, cited in this study, were primarily based on morphological characteristics of flowers, fruits, leaves and pollen grains. Plant morphology tends to present a certain phenotypic plasticity depending on the structure of interest. Generally, the differences between cultivated and wild plants lie in their fruits, which are selected by human groups to satisfy their needs, where the same characteristics can be established throughout the generations. Despite the different chromosome load between species of Sechium, intra- and inter-specific breeding has been naturally possible, which has generated different karyotypes in the wild and cultivated populations of S. edule (Avendaño-Arrazate et al., 2014). Dysploidy may play an important role in controlling the chromosome number, thereby allowing the progeny to be stable and fertile. Natural breeding, fixation of traits, natural and artificial selections, as well as the type of samples from different geographical zones, cause changes in the taxonomic classification of Sechium. At the morphological level, it is very complicated to discern the origin of outbreeding or determine the predominant morphological pattern.
In the study by Cross et al. (2006), it is assumed that the wild populations of S. edule were formed by hybridization with the species S. compositum, S. chinantlense and S. hintonii. The three species are morphologically different, which would entail that wild populations would also be the product of hybridization; another explanation is that the populations of these three species were subjected to artificial selection and evolved until their fruits had similar morphologies. Currently, the varietal complexes of S. edule described by Cadena-Iñiguez et al. (2007, 2008, 2011) can provide answers about the origin of S. edule. The varietal complexes with characteristics of dark green color and the presence of spines are the closest to wild relatives; it is followed by populations with light green color and smooth texture, while the yellow varietal complexes are considered the most distant from their wild relatives through adaptive speciation to the environment, rather than due to domestication, some which have ancestral characteristics, such as the presence of spines and small fruits. The study of these varietal complexes at the level of extra-nuclear DNA can provide clues to clarify the phylogenetic origin and diversification of S. edule. Molecular studies have not yet fully clarified the origin and formation of the Mexican Sechium species; however, S. edule and S. chinantlense constitute the most recent divergence event, even so more information is needed to determine whether S. compositum and S. hintonii participated in the formation of wild and cultivated populations of S. edule. The speciation, gene flow, and geographic isolation events of the Mexican Sechium species probably occurred in the interglacial periods of the Pleistocene. Perhaps a complete genome scan for these species can be a useful tool. The Central American clade is well supported with molecular data, but not with morphological data.
Figure 1. Evolutionary chronology for Sechium with divergence times in millions of years. Divergence-time estimation for all taxa in the TimeTree of Life (TTOL) is pre-calculated and stored in the TimeTree database. The evolutionary timeline shown was constructed by first locating the consulted species or superior taxa in the TTOL and then crossing the tree towards the root, thereby gathering divergence-time estimation in each node of the tree. TimeTree was taken from Kumar et al. (2017) in MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016). Ages: Cz= Cenozoic, Z= Neo-Proterozoic, Y= Meso-Proterozoic, X= Paleo-Proterozoic, W= Neoarchean, V= Mesoarchean, U= Paleoarchean, EA= Eoarchean; Eon: Pr= Proterozoic, A= Archean, HDE= Hadeon.
Figure 2. Evolutionary chronology of the Mexican species of Sechium with divergence times in millions of years. Ages: SER= Serravallian, PIA= Piacenzian, GEL= Gelasian; Epoch: PLE: Pleistocene. Elaborated with the TimeTree tool by Kumar et al. (2017) in MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016).
Figure 3. Evolutionary chronology of the Central American species of Sechium (Frantzia) with divergence times in millions of years (MYA). Elaborated with the TimeTree tool by Kumar et al. (2017) in MEGA 7.0 (Kumar et al., 2016).
The differences in the taxonomic classification of Sechium species are the product of the wide morphological variability present between the studied samples for each species. This variation is due to the processes of natural and artificial selection, spontaneous outbreeding, geographical location of collected samples, and genetic f low between species; otherwise, the existence of plesiomorphic and apomorphic traits will also cause changes in taxonomic classification.
A reassessment is required to correctly place S. mexicanum, since a greater affinity was found with the genus Sicyos in this analysis. The new studies for Sechium require an integral database approach to more accurately determine phylogenetic relationships within the genus. On the other hand, the Central American species of Sechium have important characteristics that can be introduced into cultivated species through classical genetic improvement and assisted by molecular markers.
| ○ | Abdelnour EA, Rocha O, 2008. Genetic characterization of a collection of chayote, Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz, in Costa Rica by using isozyme markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55: 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9225-6 |
| ○ | Aguiñiga-Sánchez I, Soto-Hernández M, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Ruíz-Posadas LM, Cadena-Zamudio JD, González-Ugarte AK, Steider BW, Santiago-Osorio E, 2015. Fruit extract from a Sechium edule hybrid induce apoptosis in leukaemic cell lines but not in normal cells. Nutr Cancer 67: 250-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2015.989370 |
| ○ | Aguiñiga-Sánchez I, Cadena-Íñiguez J, Santiago-Osorio E, Gómez-García G, Mendoza-Núñez VM, Rosado-Pérez J, et al., 2017. Chemical analyses and in vitro and in vivo toxicity of fruit methanol extract of Sechium edule var. nigrum spinosum. Pharm Biol 55: 1638-1645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13880209.2017.1316746 |
| ○ | Aung LH, Ball A, Kushad M, 1990. Developmental and nutritional aspects of chayote (Sechium edule, Cucurbitaceae). Econ Bot 44: 157-164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860483 |
| ○ | Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Cisneros-Solano VM, Aguirre-Medina JF, Moreno-Pérez EC, et al., 2012. Genetic variation of an infraspecific chayote complex evaluated by isoenzimatic systems. Pesqui Agropecu Brasileira 47: 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012000200013 |
| ○ | Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Cisneros-Solano VM, Morales-Flores FJ, Ruíz-Posadas LM, 2014. Mejoramiento genético participativo en chayote. Agroproductividad 7: 30-39. |
| ○ | Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Cisneros-Solano VM, Ramírez-Rodas YC, Mejía-Montoya GB, 2017. Variación morfológica a nivel inter e infraespecífico en Sechium spp. Agroproductividad 10: 58-63 |
| ○ | Cadena-Iñiguez J, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, 2011. Las variedades de chayote (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.) y su comercio mundial. Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, México. 98 pp. |
| ○ | Cadena-Iñiguez J, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Soto-Hernandez M, Ruiz-Posadas LM, Santiago-Osorio E, et al., 2007. Production, genetics, postharvest management and pharmacological characteristics of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw Fresh Produce 1: 41-53. Cadena-Iñiguez J, Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Soto-Hernández M, Ruiz-Posadas LM, Aguirre Medina JF, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, 2008. Infraspecific variation of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. in the state of Veracruz, Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol 55: 835-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-007-9288-4 |
| ○ | Cadena-Iñiguez J, Soto-Hernández M, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Aguirre-Medina JF, Ruíz-Posadas LM, 2011. Caracterización bioquímica de variedades domesticadas de chayote Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. comparadas con parientes silvestres. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 17: 45-55. Cadena-Iñiguez J, Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Cisneros-Solano VM, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Aguirre-Medina JF, 2013a. Modelos de mejoramiento genético participativo en chayote (Sechium spp). Colegio de Postgraduados, México. 69 pp. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2011.17.044 |
| ○ | Cadena-Iñiguez J, Soto-Hernandez M, Torres-Salas A, Aguiñiga-Sánchez I, Ruiz-Posadas LM, Rivera-Martinez AR, Avendaño-Arrazate CH, Santiago-Osorio E, 2013b. The antiproliferative effect of chayote varieties (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.) on tumour cell lines. J Med Plant Res 7: 455-460. |
| ○ | Castro-Rodríguez JM, Toledo-Díaz AM, Rodríguez-Galdón B, Perdomo-Molina A, Rodríguez-Rodríguez EM, Díaz-Romero C, 2015. Caracterización morfológica y composición bioquímica de chayotas (Sechium edule) cultivadas en las Islas Canarias (España). Arch Latinoam Nutr 65: 2-17. |
| ○ | Chen Z, Feng K, Grover CE, Li P, Liu F, Wang Y, et al., 2016. Chloroplast DNA structural variation, phylogeny, and age of divergence among diploid cotton species. PLoS One 11: e0157183. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157183 |
| ○ | Chomicki G, Schaefer H, Renner SS, 2019. Origin and domestication of Cucurbitaceae crops: insights from phylogenies, genomics and archaeology. New Phytol 226: 1240-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16015 |
| ○ | Cross H, Lira SR, Motley TJ, 2006. Origin and diversification of chayote. In: Darwin's harvest: New approaches to the origins, evolution, and conservation of crops; Motley TJ, Zerega N, Cross H (eds.). pp: 171-194. Columbia Univ Press, USA. |
| ○ | De Donato M, Cequea H, 1994. A cytogenetic study of six cultivars of the chayote, Sechium edule Sw (Cucurbitaceae). J Hered 85: 238-241. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a111444 |
| ○ | De Storme N, Mason A, 2014. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: Cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Curr Plant Biol 1: 10-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002 |
| ○ | Doebley J, Goodman M, Stuber CW, 1987. Patterns of isozyme variation between maize and Mexican annual teosinte. Econ Bot 41: 234-246. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858971 |
| ○ | EL-Bakatoushi R, Ahmed DGA, 2018. Evaluation of genetic diversity in wild populations of Peganum harmala L., a medicinal plant. J Genet Eng Biotechnol 16: 143-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.11.007 |
| ○ | Fauziah NA, Hidajati K, Soejoenoes A, 2019. The effect of chayote extract (Sechium edule) on blood pressure in pregnant women with hypertension. Med J Indones 4: 266-277. https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2019.04.03.10 |
| ○ | Gao Y, Yin S, Yang H, Wu L, Yan Y, 2018. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of seven Amorphophallus species in southwestern China revealed by chloroplast DNA sequences. Mitochondrial DNA A 29: 679-686. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2017.1350855 |
| ○ | GISeM, 2015. Diversidad de chayotes en México Sechium spp. Distribución de accesiones conservadas en el Banco de Germoplasma de Sechium edule (BANGESE) en Huatusco, Veracruz. Grupo interdisciplinario de investigación en Sechium edule en México, Colegio de Postgraduados. |
| ○ | Guevara HF, Rodríguez LL, Gómez CH, Pinto RR, Rodríguez GG, Perezgrovas GR, 2014. Criterios locales para la selección de semillas de chayote (Sechium edule Jacq. Sw) en zonas rurales de Chiapas, México. Acta Agron 64: 178-185. https://doi.org/10.15446/acag.v64n2.39776 |
| ○ | Ikeda H, Carlsen T, Fujii N, Brochmann C, Setoguchi H, 2012. Pleistocene climatic oscillations and the speciation history of an alpine endemic and a widespread arctic-alpine plant. New Phytol 194: 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04061.x |
| ○ | Islam S, Kumar A, Kumar DK, Alom S, 2018. Physicochemical analysis and nutritional properties of fresh, osmo-dehydrated and dried chayote (Sechium edule L.). J Post Technol 6: 49-56. |
| ○ | Jain JR, Timsina B, Satyan KB, Manohar SH, 2017. A comparative assessment of morphological and molecular diversity among Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. accessions in India. 3 Biotech 7: 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0726-5 |
| ○ | Jeffrey C, 1966. On the classification of the Cucurbitaceae. Kew Bull 20: 417-426. https://doi.org/10.2307/4108235 |
| ○ | Jeffrey C, 1978. Further notes on Cucurbitaceae: IV: Some new-world taxa. Kew Bull 33: 347-380. https://doi.org/10.2307/4109590 |
| ○ | Kalpana KSG, Dhananjaya K, Ravikumar KR, Mallesha H, 2013. Antibacterial activity of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz against gram negative food borne bacteria. Adv Appl Sci Res 4: 259-261. |
| ○ | Kück P, Wägele JW, 2016. Plesiomorphic character states cause systematic errors in molecular phylogenetic analyses: a simulation study. Cladistics 32: 461-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12132 |
| ○ | Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K, 2016. MEGA 7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33: 1870-1874.Kumar S, Stecher G, Suleski M, Hedges SB, 2017. TimeTree: a resource for timelines, timetrees, and divergence times. Mol Biol Evol 34: 1812-1819. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054 |
| ○ | Lalthansanga J, Samanta AK, 2015. Effect of feeding chayote (Sechium edule) meal on growth performance and nutrient utilization in indigenous pig (Zovawk) of Mizoram. Vet World 8: 918-923. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2015.918-923 |
| ○ | Lira SR, 1995. Estudios taxonómicos en el género Sechium P. Br. Cucurbitaceae. Doctoral thesis. Univ. Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F. |
| ○ | Lira R, 1996. Chayote. Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw., promoting the conservation and use of underutilized and neglected crops. Inst Plant Genet Crop Plant Res, Gatersleben/IPGRI, Rome. |
| ○ | Lira R, Chiang F, 1992. Two new combinations in Sechium (Cucurbitaceae) from Central America, and a new species from Oaxaca, Mexico. Novon 2: 227-231. https://doi.org/10.2307/3391556 |
| ○ | Lira R, Nee M, 1999. A new species of Sechium Sect. Frantzia (Cucurbitaceae, Sicyeae, Sicyinae) from Mexico. Brittonia 51: 204-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666628 |
| ○ | Lira R, Alvarado JL, Castrejón J, 1994. Nota sobre el polen de Sechium chinantlense Lira & Chiang y Parasicyos dieterleae Lira & Torres (Cucurbitaceae). Bol Soc Bot México 54: 275-280.Lira R, Caballero J, Dávila P, 1997a. A contribution to the generic delimitation of Sechium (Cucurbitaceae, Sicyinae). Taxon 46: 269-282. https://doi.org/10.2307/1224097 |
| ○ | Lira R, Villaseñor JL, Dávila PD, 1997b. A cladistic analysis of the subtribe Sicyinae (Cucurbitaceae). Syst Bot 22: 415-425. https://doi.org/10.2307/2419817 |
| ○ | Lira R, Castrejón J, Zamudio S, Rojas ZC, 1999. Propuesta de ubicación taxonómica para los chayotes silvestres (Sechium edule, Cucurbitaceae) de México. Acta Bot Mex 49: 47-61. https://doi.org/10.21829/abm49.1999.838 |
| ○ | Lira R, Eguiarte LE, Montes-Hernández S, 2009. Proyecto recopilación y análisis de la información existente de las especies de los géneros Cucurbita y Sechium que crecen y/o se cultivan en México. |
| ○ | Lombardo-Earl G, Roman-Ramos R, Zamilpa A, Herrera-Ruiz M, Rosas-Salgado G, Tortoriello J, Jiménez-Ferrer E, 2014. Extracts and fractions from edible roots of Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. with antihypertensive activity. Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2014: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/594326 |
| ○ | Machida-Hirano R, Cortés-Cruz M, González BAA, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Shirata K, Watanabe KN, 2015. Isolation and characterization of novel microsatellite markers in chayote [Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.]. Am J Plant Sci 6: 2033-2041. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.613203 |
| ○ | Maity S, Firdous SM, Debnath R, 2013. Evaluation of antidiabetic activity of ethanolic extract of Sechium edule fruits in alloxan-induced diabetic rats. World J Pharm Pharm Sci 2: 3612-3621. |
| ○ | Martiar SJ, 2017. Effect of antihipoglycemic Sechium edule Jacq. Swartz. Ethanol extract on histopathologic changes in hyperglycemic Mus musculus L. J Med 2: 86-93. https://doi.org/10.26911/theijmed.2017.02.02.02 |
| ○ | Mercado P, Lira R, Castrejón J, 1993. Estudios cromosómicos de Sechium edule P. Br. y Sicana naudin (Cucurbitaceae). XII Congreso Mexicano de Botánica. Sociedad Botánica de Mérida, Yucatán (México), 176 pp. |
| ○ | Moncayo-Pérez CD, Magaña-Lira N, Peña-Lomelí A, Leyva-Mir SG, Sahagún-Castellanos J, Pérez-Grajales M, 2020. White smut (Entyloma australe Speg.) resistance in tomatillo (Physalis spp.) germplasm. Rev Chapingo Ser Hortic 26: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2019.09.016 |
| ○ | Monge PJ, Loría CM, 2017. Caracterización de frutos de cinco genotipos de tacaco [Sechium tacaco (Pittier) C. Jeffrey] en Costa Rica. Tecnol Marcha 30: 71-84. https://doi.org/10.18845/tm.v30i3.3274 |
| ○ | Monroy-Vázquez ME, Soto-Hernández M, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Santiago-Osorio E, Ruiz-Posadas LM, Rosas-Acevedo H, 2009. Estudio biodirigido de un extracto alcohólico de frutos de Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz. Agrociencia 43: 777-790. |
| ○ | Morales AJ, 1994. Morfología general del tacaco, Sechium tacaco (Cucurbitaceae). Rev Biol Trop 42: 59-71. |
| ○ | Neeraja K, Debnath R, Firdous SM, 2015. Cardioprotective activity of fruits of Sechium edule. Bangladesh J Pharmacol 10: 125-130. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjp.v10i1.21329 |
| ○ | Nevado B, Contreras-Ortiz N, Hughes C, Filatov DA, 2018. Pleistocene glacial cycles drive isolation, gene flow and speciation in the high-elevation Andes. New Phytol 219: 779-793. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15243 |
| ○ | Newstrom LE, 1986. Studies in the origin and evolution of chayote, Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw. (Cucurbitaceae). Doctoral thesis, Univ. of California, Berkeley, USA. |
| ○ | Newstrom LE, 1990. Origin and evolution of chayote, Sechium edule. In: Biology and utilization of the Cucurbitaceae; Bates DM, Robinson RW, Jeffrey C (eds.). pp: 141-149. Comstock Publ Assoc, Cornell Univ Press. https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501745447-014 |
| ○ | Newstrom LE, 1991. Evidence for the origin of chayote, Sechium edule (Cucurbitaceae). Econ Bot 45: 410-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887082 |
| ○ | Okamoto Y, Nomura A, Yamanaka A, Maruyama S, 2008. The extract of Sechium edule fruit reduces endothelin-1 release in cultured cells. Japan J Food Eng 8: 117-122. https://doi.org/10.11301/jsfe2000.8.117 |
| ○ | Olguín-Hernández G, Valdovinos-Ponce G, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, 2013. Etiología de la marchitez de las plantas de chayote (Sechium edule) en el estado de Veracruz. Rev Mex Fitopatol 31: 161-169. |
| ○ | Olvera-Vázquez SG, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Gilani SA, Watanabe KN, 2019. The cytological studies on neglected and underutilized cucurbit species with special reference to chayote, an under-exploited species. Am J Plant Sci 10: 1261-1279. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2019.108091 |
| ○ | Palacios R, 1987. Estudio exploratorio del número cromosómico de chayote Sechium edule Sw. Tesis Ing. Agron., Univ. Veracruzana, Córdova, Veracruz. |
| ○ | Patwardhan A, Ray S, Roy A, 2014. Molecular markers in phylogenetic studies-A review. J Phylogen Evolution Biol 2: 1-9. |
| ○ | Ren Y, Zhang Z, Liu J, Staub JE, Han Y, Cheng Z, et al., 2009. An integrated genetic and cytogenetic map of the Cucumber genome. PLoS One 4: e5795. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005795 |
| ○ | Riviello-Flores MDL, Arévalo-Galarza MLC, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Soto-Hernández M, Ruiz-Posadas LDM, Gómez-Merino FC, 2018. Nutraceutic characteristics of the extracts and juice of chayote (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.) fruits. Beverages 4: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages4020037 |
| ○ | Rosado-Pérez J, Aguiñiga-Sánchez I, Santiago-Osorio E, Mendoza-Núñez VM, 2019. Effect of Sechium edule var. nigrum spinosum (Chayote) on oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory markers in older adults with metabolic syndrome: An Exploratory study. Antioxidants 8 (5): 146. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox8050146 |
| ○ | Salazar-Aguilar S, Ruiz-Posadas LDM, Cadena-Iñiguez J, Soto-Hernández M, Santiago-Osorio E, Aguiñiga-Sánchez I, Rivera-Martínez AR, Aguirre-Medina JF, 2017. Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz, a new cultivar with antiproliferative potential in a human cervical cancer HeLa cell line. Nutrients 9: e798. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9080798 |
| ○ | Sanjur OI, Piperno DR, Andres TC, Wessel-Beaver L, 2002. Phylogenetic relationships among domesticated and wild species of Cucurbita (Cucurbitaceae) inferred from a mitochondrial gene: Implications for crop plant evolution and areas of origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99: 535-540. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012577299 |
| ○ | Sateesh G, Fathullah HS, Santhosh KG, Samba SRV, 2012. Anti-ulcer activity of Sechium edule ethanolic fruit extract. Pharma Innovation 1: 77-81. |
| ○ | Schaefer H, Heibl C, Renner SS, 2009. Gourds afloat: a dated phylogeny reveals an Asian origin of the gourd family (Cucurbitaceae) and numerous oversea dispersal events. Proc Biol Sci 276: 843-851. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1447 |
| ○ | Sebastian P, Schaefer H, Lira R, Telford IRH, Renner SR, 2012. Radiation following long-distance dispersal: the contributions of time, opportunity and diaspore morphology in Sicyos (Cucurbitaceae). J Biogeogr 39: 1427-1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2012.02695.x |
| ○ | Shukla S, Sinha S, Khan S, Kumar S, Singh K, Mitra K, Maurya R, Meeran SM, 2016. Cucurbitacin B inhibits the stemness and metastatic abilities of NSCLC via downregulation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling axis. Sci Rep 6: 21860. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21860 |
| ○ | Smýkal P, Coyne CJ, Ambrose MJ, Maxted N, Schaefer H, Blair MW, et al., 2015. Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for science and breeding. Crit Rev Plant Sci 34: 43-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.897904 |
| ○ | The Plant List, 2010. Version 1. http://www.theplantlist.org/ [accessed 05 Oct. 2019]. |
| ○ | Verma VK, Pandey A, Jha AK, Ngachan SV, 2017. Genetic characterization of chayote (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Swartz. Landraces of North Eastern Hills of India and conservation measure. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 23: 911-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-017-0478-z |
| ○ | Wunderlin RP, 1976. Two new species and a new combination in Frantzia (Cucurbitaceae). Brittonia 28: 239-244. https://doi.org/10.2307/2805833 |
| ○ | Yuan Z, Ma Y, Zeng J, Lixin D, Xue X, Wang H, et al., 2016. Convergence and divergence of bitterness biosynthesis and regulation in Cucurbitaceae. Nat Plants 2: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nplants.2016.183 |
| ○ | Zhang S, Miao H, Sun R, Wang X, Huang S, Wehner TC, Gu X, 2013. Localization of a new gene for bitterness in Cucumber. J Hered 104: 134-139. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/ess075 |
| ○ | Zhang X, Xu Z, Pei H, Chen Z, Tan X, Hu J, Yang B, Sun J, 2017. Intraspecific variation and phylogenetic relationships are revealed by ITS1 secondary structure analysis and single-nucleotide polymorphism in Ganoderma lucidum. PLoS One 12: e0169042. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169042 |
| ○ | Zhou J, Liu M, Chen Y, Xu S, Guo Y, Zhao L, 2019. Cucurbitacin B suppresses proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells by ceRNA: Effect of miR-146b-5p and lncRNA-AFAP1-AS1. J Cell Physiol 234: 4655-4667. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27264 |