INTRODUCTION
⌅Corn grain is commonly used as a starch source in calves’ diets. The starch granules of corn are completely embedded in a protein matrix, reducing the starch availability since this matrix is impermeable to water and enzymes (Sadeghi et al., 2012). Cereal grains may be processed to increase their digestibility, by affecting the rate and extent of starch and protein degradation in the rumen and their intestinal digestion (Yu et al., 2010).
The rate and extent of ruminal fermentation vary widely with grain source and cereal processing methods (Huntington, 1997). Increasing starch availability is the primary goal of corn grain heat-processing. Processing methods have been shown to improve nutrient digestibility and shift the rate and site of grain digestion (Chrenkova et al., 2018). Extrusion increases starch degradation in the rumen, while pressure toasting decreases degradation and increases rumen bypass starch (Yu et al., 2002). Steam-flaking has been found to increase the amount of starch fermented in the rumen and enhance starch digestion in the small intestine (Firkins et al., 2001).
Micronization is the term that refers to a high-temperature, short-time heat processing of grains using near-infrared (NIR) rays. This affects the constituent molecules to vibrate, which leads to intermolecular friction, resulting in rapid heating of the material that causes the gelatinization of starch (Deepa & Hebbar, 2014). Micronization has many advantages compared to other heating methods because infrared energy heats the grains directly, which enables achieving a high efficiency level. Increasing the starch availability and altering the site of digestion of protein from the rumen to the intestine is the primary goal of grain processing. This may result in an improved supply of amino acids to animal metabolism (Safaei & Yang, 2017). Heat processing improves the efficiency of fermentative utilization by modifying the protein matrix of the endosperm and the starch structure (gelatinization and dextrination), thus enabling a better utilization by microbial enzymatic digestion (Alvarado et al., 2009). According to Yu et al. (2010), micronization significantly reduced protein degradability (74 vs. 63%), but increased starch degradability (87 vs. 93%) of the oat in dairy total mixed rations. Deepa & Hebbar (2014) reported that micronization increased the rapidly digestible starch content (7.1 to 7.7%) determined in vitro, which may be attributed mainly to the gelatinization of starch. On the other hand, Sadeghi et al. (2012), in the experiment with rams, found that the micronization of corn grain decreased the potentially degradable fraction and ruminal degradation rate of starch. McAllister & Sultana (2011), in a study with steers, also detected that micronized wheat markedly reduced the rate and extent of ruminal disappearances of dry matter (DM), starch and protein, suggesting the increased resistance of protein to microbial digestion in the rumen.
However, scientific research to evaluate the dietary effects of micronized cereal grains on feed consumption, nutrient digestibilities and metabolic response in dairy calves is limited. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of micronized corn grain as a dietary starch source on total tract nutrient digestibility and blood biochemical parameters in weaned Holstein calves.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
⌅The experiment was carried out at a commercial dairy cattle farm (PKB Corporation Padinska Skela), Serbia. The study was conducted according to the Animal Welfare Act (41/2009, Official Gazette). Experimental procedures complied with adopted standards by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Faculty of Agriculture.
Experimental design, treatments, and management
⌅Thirty weaned Holstein dairy calves (20 male and 10 female) with initially 72±1.9 kg of body weight (BW) and 65 to 74 days of age were randomly assigned to one of two experimental grower diets (15 calves per treatment). From day 4 to weaning, all calves were fed 6 L/day of prepared milk replacer, while starter and high-quality alfalfa hay were fed ad libitum. Calves were weaned at 60 days of age. Ground corn and micronized corn (ground through a 2-mm mesh) were used to formulate two iso-starch, isonitrogenous, and isoenergetic pelleted calf growers with all other components. The experiment was designed as one factorial arrangement with two treatments – a grower that included untreated corn grain (UCG) and a grower that included micronized corn grain (MCG). Calves were housed in group pens (3 calves/pen), wherein each experimental treatment consisted of five pens with 2 male calves and 1 female calf. Pens were bedded with long wheat straw, which was renewed every 24 h. The experimental period lasted for 60 days.
The corn grain (dent corn hybrid Maksim, Institute PKB Agroekonomik, Padinska Skela) was conditioned before micronization to reach a 25% moisture content, and thereafter was subjected to micronization for 45 s at 120°C (Infra-Red Micronizer, Micronizing Company U.K. Ltd). The micronized grains were flaked by a heavy-duty flaking mill (a 0.8 mm gap between rolls) and cooled in a counter flow-cooler. The micronizer capacity was 1200 kg/h. Micronized material was ground by a hammer mill before mixing with the other components. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of heat-treated and untreated corn grain used to formulate calf growers.
Calves were fed the concentrate mixtures (20% crude protein - CP on a DM basis) for ad libitum intake (orts did not exceed 10%). The pellets were 20 mm in length and 4 mm in diameter. The ingredient composition of calf mixtures is presented in Table 2. Calves were allowed free access to unchopped high-quality alfalfa hay from feeding buckets and water from a drinker in each pen. Growers and alfalfa hay were offered to calves once a day at 07:00 h.
| Ingredient | MCG | UCG | Alfalfa hay |
|---|---|---|---|
| DM, % | 89.6 | 87.9 | 83.0 |
| CP, % DM | 8.22 | 8.49 | 20.15 |
| EE, % DM | 3.62 | 3.47 | 2.09 |
| NDF, % DM | 11.0 | 11.2 | 44.0 |
| ADF, % DM | 2.58 | 2.76 | 32.02 |
| SNFC, % DM | 76.1 | 75.6 | 27.1 |
| Ash, % DM | 1.10 | 1.16 | 8.72 |
| Ca, % DM | 0.05 | 0.05 | 1.91 |
| P, % DM | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.34 |
Digestibility trial
⌅Apparent total tract digestibility of the nutrients was measured using acid-insoluble ash as a suitable internal marker (Van Keulen & Young, 1977; Huhtanen et al., 1994). During the two periods (days 25–30 and days 55–60 of the experiment), fecal grab samples were collected from the pen floor, composited by pen, and then frozen at −20°C until further analysis. Samples were mostly collected between 07:00 and 9:00 h, and care was taken not to sample non-fecal material. Feeds were offered for minimal refusals (about 3%) during the collection periods. Offered feeds and orts were measured and stored, composited, and subsampled for analysis. During both digestibility periods, new bedding was added only twice to minimize the straw consumption by calves.
Apparent nutrient digestibility in the total tract was calculated from concentrations of the marker and nutrients in the consumed diet (grower and alfalfa hay) and feces using the following equation: Apparent digestibility = 100-[(Md/Mf)×(Nf/Nd)]×100, where Md = concentration of the marker in the consumed diet, Mf = concentration of the marker in the feces, Nf = concentration of the nutrient in the feces, and Nd = concentration of the nutrient in the consumed diet.
Body weight (BW) was recorded before the morning meal at days 30 and 60 of the experimental period.
Analytical procedures
⌅Composites of feed, fecal, and ort samples were analyzed in the Laboratory of Animal Nutrition at the Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade. Composite fecal samples were thawed at room temperature and dried in a forced-air oven at 55°C (approximately 48 h). Samples of growers, alfalfa hay, orts, and feces were ground to pass a 1 mm screen on a small-sample mill (Kinematica PX-MFC 90D). Ground samples of feeds and feces were analyzed according to the Official Methods (AOAC, 2002). The analytical DM content of samples was determined by drying at 105°C for 16 h (method 967.03). Ash was determined by combustion at 600°C for 2 h (method 942.05). The CP content was determined by the Kjeldahl method (method 2001.11) using K2SO4/Cu catalyst-Kjeltabs S 3.5 using a Kjeltec Auto 1030 Analyzer-Tecator System. Ether extract (EE) content was determined by extraction using diethyl-ether in the Soxhlet apparatus (method 920.39). The neutral detergent fiber (NDF) content was determined according Method 2002.04, using heat-stable α-amylase (A3306 Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA), without using sodium sulfite and without correcting ash content. The acid detergent fiber (ADF) was determined without correcting ash content (Method 973.18).
The acid-insoluble ash content of concentrate mixtures, alfalfa hay, and feces was determined according to Van Keulen & Young (1977) using 2 M HCl.
Blood biochemical parameters
⌅On day 60 of the experimental period, blood samples (20 mL) were collected from each calf between 10:00 and 12:00 h using a jugular catheter into a vacutainer tube and placed on ice. The samples were centrifuged at 3000×g for 15 min at 4°C, and the obtained plasma subsamples were analyzed for glucose, total protein, and urea nitrogen using commercial kits (ThermoFisher Scientific: EIAGLUC, A53227, and EIABUN, respectively) and the semi-automatic biochemical analyzer RT-1904C (Rayto Life and Analytical Sciences Co. Ltd) in the laboratory for diagnostic analysis of PKB Corporation – Centre for livestock production, Padinska Skela.
| MCG | UCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Ingredients (%) | ||
| Corn, ground | - | 59.0 |
| Corn-micronized, ground | 59.0 | - |
| Whole soybean, extruded | 22.0 | 22.0 |
| Sunflower meal | 15.0 | 15.0 |
| Calcium carbonate | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Calcium diphosphate | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| NaCl | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Minazel1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Vitamin and mineral mix2 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Chemical composition | ||
| Dry matter (DM), % | 91.4 | 90.3 |
| Crude protein, % DM | 19.7 | 20.1 |
| Ether extract, % DM | 6.53 | 6.41 |
| NDF, % DM | 23.0 | 23.6 |
| ADF, % DM | 12.5 | 13.0 |
| NFC, % DM | 47.4 | 46.7 |
| Ash, % DM | 5.40 | 5.52 |
| Ca, % DM | 0.82 | 0.84 |
| P, % DM | 0.71 | 0.68 |
Energy utilization
⌅Digestible energy (DE) values of calves’ diets were estimated according to Weiss (1999) using determined apparent total tract digestibility of CP, nonfiber carbohydrates (NFC), NDF, and EE. Levels of dietary metabolizable energy (ME) as well as net energy for maintenance (NEm) and net energy for gain (NEg) were calculated according to Galyean et al. (2016).
Statistical analysis
⌅The Student’s t-Test using the JASP v.0.15 (JASP Team, 2021) was conducted to assess the effects of corn grain micronization on total tract nutrient digestibility and blood metabolites in calves. The Shapiro-Wilk’s test was used to test the assumption of the normal distribution of analyzed data. Overall differences between treatment means were considered to be significant at p<0.05 and trend at p<0.1. The parameters of descriptive statistics were also determined.