Introduction
⌅For small ruminants raised in dry and semi-arid conditions, the spineless cacti are an attractive and strategic source of feed. These Cactaceae have high levels of non-fibrous carbohydrates (523 g/kg of dry matter (DM)), low content of neutral detergent fiber (94.7 g/kg DM), and high coefficient of DM digestibility (Costa et al., 2012Costa RG, Treviño IH, Medeiros GR, Medeiros AN, Pinto TF, Oliveira RL, 2012. Effects of replacing corn with cactus pear (Opuntia ficus indica Mill) on the performance of Santa Inês lambs. Small Rumin Res 102: 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.09.012; Siqueira et al., 2017Siqueira MC, Ferreira MA, Monnerat JPIS, Silva JL, Costa CT, Conceição MG, et al., 2017. Optimizing the use of spineless cactus in the diets of cattle: Total and partial digestibility, fiber dynamics and ruminal parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 226: 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.12.006). However, the dissemination of carmine cochineal (Dactylopius opuntiae), a debilitating pest of forage cactus cultivation, is a limiting factor to the production of this fodder in areas of Africa, America, and Asia. In this context, two genotypes resistant to carmine cochineal have been developed: ‘Miúda’ (Nopallea cochenillifera Salm Dyck) and Orelha de Elefante Mexicana - ‘OEM’ (Opuntia stricta Haw.) (Vasconcelos et al., 2009Vasconcelos AGV, Lira MA, Cavalcanti VLB, Santos MVF, Willadino L, 2009. Seleção de clones de palma forrageira resistentes à cochonilha-do-carmim (Dactylopius sp). Rev Bras Zootec 38: 827-831. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009000500007).
Diets containing spineless cacti change the profile of rumen fermentation in sheep, compared to diets that use only grasses as roughage, which, consequently, can affect the performance and characteristics of the carcass and meat. Araújo et al. (2020)Araújo CM, Batista AMV, Carvalho FFR, Silva MP, Ramos AO, Souza AP, et al., 2020. Inclusion of Opuntia stricta (Haw.) in sheep diets affects nutrition and the physicochemical characteristics of the rumen content. Rev Bras Zootec 49: e20190271. https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190271, when evaluating the effects of the inclusion of the cactus ‘OEM’ in sheep diets, observed that the inclusion of cactus increased the acetate, propionate, butyrate, and total short-chain fatty acid concentrations in the rumen.
Previous studies have shown that the addition of ‘Miúda’ spineless cacti in lamb diets for lambs enhances growth performance and carcass characteristics without degrading the quality of the meat (Cardoso et al., 2021Cardoso DB, Medeiros GR, Guim A, Azevedo PS, Suassuna JMA, Júnior DML, et al., 2021. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of lambs fed with increasing levels of spineless cactus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 272: 114788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114788). Furthermore, it enhances consumer acceptance and raises the carcass finishing fat (Moura et al., 2020Moura MSC, Guim A, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Cardoso DB, Lima Júnior DM, et al., 2020. The inclusion of spineless cactus in the diet of lambs increases fattening of the carcass. Meat Sci 160: 107975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107975). Nevertheless, no research has assessed ‘OEM’ spineless cactus’s impact on lamb finishing.
Despite the variation already reported in the literature between the chemical composition of the different spineless cactus genotypes, such as the content of non-fibrous carbohydrates and crude protein (Siqueira et al., 2019Siqueira TDQ, Monnerat JPIS, Chagas JCC, Conceição MG, Siqueira MCB, Viana TBL, et al., 2019. Cactus cladodes associated with urea and sugarcane bagasse: an alternative to conserved feed in semi-arid regions. Trop Anim Health Prod 51: 1975-1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-01895-1; Usman et al., 2022Usman UA, Moraes ACA, Silva TGP, Batista AMV, Soares PC, Araújo CASC, et al., 2022. Kidney changes in lambs fed cactus pear varieties resistant to Dactylopius opuntiae as the only roughage. Trop Anim Health Prod 54: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03328-y), some evidence suggests that ‘OEM’ genotype has the potential to replace ‘Miúda’ in the diet of dairy cattle (Monteiro et al., 2018Monteiro CCF, Ferreira MA, Véras ASC, Guido SI, Almeida MP, Silva RC, et al., 2018. A new cactus variety for dairy cows in areas infested with Dactylopius opuntiae. Anim Prod Sci 59: 479-485. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17256; Silva et al., 2018Silva RC, Ferreira MA, Oliveira JCV, Santos DC, Gama MAS, Chagas JCC, et al., 2018. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana (Opuntia stricta [Haw.] Haw.) spineless cactus as an option in crossbred dairy cattle diet. S Afr J Anim Sci 48: 516-525. https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v48i3.12) and beef lambs (Lopes et al., 2020Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328; Silva et al., 2021Silva TGP, Batista AMV, Guim A, Souza FAL, Carvalho FFR, Silva Júnior VA, et al., 2021. Cactus cladodes cause intestinal damage, but improve sheep performance. Trop Anim Health Prod 53: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02731-1).
It was therefore hypothesized that lambs fed ‘OEM’ spineless cactus would have meat and carcass characteristics comparable to those fed ‘Miúda’ spineless cactus, and that they would be a better option than lambs fed grass hay. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of the two spineless cactus genotypes (‘OEM’ - Opuntia or ‘Miúda’ - Nopalea) on the carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot lambs.
Material and methods
⌅The animals were handled and cared according to the guidelines and recommendations of the Committee of Ethics in the Use of Animals of the Federal Rural University of Pernambuco (UFRPE), under license number (142/2018). The experiment was performed in the Department of Animal Science, UFRPE, in Recife, Brazil (8º04’03’’S and 34º55’00’’W).
The present study, which is part of a broader project, was developed based on a prior methodology by Lopes et al. (2020)Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328. To determine nutrient intake and obtain carcasses, 36 uncastrated male Santa Inês lambs, with an average age of 6±1 months and an average initial body weight (BW) of 22.0±2.9 kg, were used. The lambs were distributed into three treatments and 12 replications, in a completely randomized design. The experimental period lasted 86 days, with the first 30 days for the adaptation of the animals to the facilities, the diets, and the management, and the remaining 56 days for evaluation and data collection. The experimental area was composed of individual stalls, with dimensions of 1.0 × 1.8 m, including drinkers and feeders, arranged in a covered shed. Prior to the experiment’s commencement, all the animals were identified, treated for the control of endoparasites, and vaccinated against clostridia.
The diets were formulated to be isonitrogenous and to meet the nutritional requirements of lambs weighing 25 kg, with an average daily gain of approximately 200 g, according to the nutritional recommendations of the National Research Council (2007)NRC, 2007. Nutrient requeriments of small ruminants, 11th Ed. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.. The chemical composition of ingredients is presented in Lopes et al. (2020Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328).
Experimental diets consisted of three treatments: (1) Tifton hay as exclusive roughage; (2) ‘Miúda’ spineless cactus (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dyck); or (3) ‘OEM’ spineless cactus (Opuntia stricta Haw.) (3) as a partial replacement for Tifton hay (75%) (Lopes et al., 2020Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328), with roughage:concentrate ratio of 60:40 (dry matter basis).
The spineless cactus was crushed daily, in a machine suitable for forage cactus processing. To lessen animal selection, the hay was ground in a forage machine equipped with an 8 mm sieve screen, and mixed with the other ingredients. Diets were offered as a total mixed ration twice a day (08:00 h and 15:00 h), with 15% of the leftovers being allowed. The water was provided ad libitum. Informations regarding collection, processing and chemical analysis of feed and leftovers were reported by Lopes et al. (2020)Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328, in research associated with the present study. The intakes of DM and metabolizable energy (ME) were calculated.
After 86 days of feedlot, the animals (average final age of 9 months and average final weight of 36.1 kg) were 16 hours fasted, and they were weighed right before slaughter in order to determine their BW. Then, the animals were stunned with a penetrating captive bolt pistol (Ctrade®, Tec 10 PP) driven by an exploding cartridge, and suspended by their hind limbs using hooks, followed by bleeding of the carotid artery and sectioning of the jugular vein. All blood was collected and weighed in a properly identified pail and, after bleeding, manual skinning and evisceration were performed.
Following skinning and evisceration, the head (sectioned at the atlantooccipital joint), legs (sectioned at the carpal and tarsus-metatarsal joints), and tail were separated. All organs, as well as the internal fat of the gastrointestinal tract, were separated and weighed individually. Then, the carcass was weighed for the determination of hot carcass weight (HCW).
Afterwards, the gallbladder, bladder, and gastrointestinal tract (rumen, reticulum, omasum, abomasum, small and large intestines) were weighed when full, then emptied, washed, and weighed again. The empty body weight (EBW) was calculated as the difference between the sum of the gastrointestinal tract, gallbladder and bladder weights, head, carcass, skin, tail, legs, and blood and the sum of the contents of the gastrointestinal tract, bladder, and gallbladder (Cezar & Souza, 2007Cezar MF, Souza WH, 2007. Carcaças ovinas e caprinas: obtenção, avaliação e classificação. Uberaba: Agropecuária Tropical. 147 pp.).
The hot carcasses were taken to a cold chamber with an average temperature of 4°C, where they remained for 24 hours, suspended by the tendon of the gastrocnemius muscle using hooks. After this cooling period, the carcasses were weighed to obtain the cold carcass weight (CCW).
To evaluate the pH of the carcass, it was measured at 0 h and 24 h postmortem, from the Longissimus dorsi muscle, with the aid of a pH meter, according to the methodology described by Rodrigues et al. (2008)Rodrigues GH, Susin I, Pires AV, 2008. Citrus pulp in diets for feedlot lambs: carcass characteristics and meat quality. Rev Bras Zootec 37: 1869-1875. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001000022. On the other hand, chilling losses (CL) was quantified by the following formulas: CL (kg) = HCW - CCW, and CL (%) = (HCW - CCW/HCW) × 100. The biological yield (BY), hot carcass yield (HCY), and cold carcass yield (CCY) were determined by the following formulas: BY = HCW/EBW × 100; HCY = HCW/BW at slaughter × 100; and CCY = CCW/BW at slaughter × 100, respectively.
Later, the carcasses were divided sagittally, and the half carcasses were sectioned into six anatomical regions constituting the meat cuts; this led to the following cuts: neck, shoulder, ribs, saw, loin and leg. Also, the relative regional composition of the carcass was determined by the relative calculation of each cut by the reconstituted weight of the left half carcass, according to Cezar & Sousa (2007)Cezar MF, Souza WH, 2007. Carcaças ovinas e caprinas: obtenção, avaliação e classificação. Uberaba: Agropecuária Tropical. 147 pp..
To obtain the Longissimus muscle area (LMA) in the carcass, a cut was performed between the 12th and 13th rib for the exposure of the Longissimus dorsi muscle, whose area was hatched with a permanent marker on clear plastic film, which was subsequently measured with a digital planimeter (HAFF®, Digiplan model) using the mean of three readings. Subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) was measured with a caliper on the Longissimus dorsi muscle (Cezar & Sousa, 2007Cezar MF, Souza WH, 2007. Carcaças ovinas e caprinas: obtenção, avaliação e classificação. Uberaba: Agropecuária Tropical. 147 pp.).
The left leg of each animal was frozen (-15°C) and vacuum-packed for the analysis of tissue composition. To determine the tissue composition, the legs were thawed for 24 hours under refrigeration (4°C). The tissue composition was determined (Purchas et al., 1991Purchas RW, Davies AS, Abdullah AY, 1991. An objective measure of muscularity: changes with animal growth and differences between genetic lines of Southdown sheep. Meat Sci 30: 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(91)90037-Q) and obtained through dissection in accordance with Cezar & Sousa, (2007)Cezar MF, Souza WH, 2007. Carcaças ovinas e caprinas: obtenção, avaliação e classificação. Uberaba: Agropecuária Tropical. 147 pp.; the leg muscularity index was calculated as / FL, where P5M represents the weight of the five muscles (femoral biceps, femoral quadriceps, semimembranosus, semitendinosus, and adductor), in g; and FL is the femoral length, in cm.
The loins (Longissimus lumborum) were employed for the physicochemical study of the meat after being refrigerated (4°C) for 24 hours. The evaluations of meat color: lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) (MINOLTA CORP., 1994) were performed with the aid of a Minolta Chroma Meter CR-400 digital colorimeter, after exposure to oxygen for 50 min. The pH of the meat was measured with a potentiometer (Testo Instrument Co. LTD., Germany), according to Rodrigues et al. (2008)Rodrigues GH, Susin I, Pires AV, 2008. Citrus pulp in diets for feedlot lambs: carcass characteristics and meat quality. Rev Bras Zootec 37: 1869-1875. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001000022. The water-holding capacity was performed according to the methodology of Santos-Silva et al. (2002)Santos-Silva J, Mendes IA, Bessa RJB, 2002. The effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs. II: Growth, carcass composition and meat quality. Liv Sci 76: 17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00334-7. Samples of approximately 300 mg were weighed on filter papers, and pressed for five minutes, using a weight of 3.4 kg. Following this procedure, the samples were discarded and the filter sheets were weighed.
Assessments of cooking losses (CL) and shear force were performed according to Wheeler et al. (1993)Wheeler TL, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, 1993. Effects of marbling degree on palatability and caloric content of beef. Beef Research Progress Report 71: 133-134. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/hruskareports/126.. To determine the CL, the loin was first weighed, and then roasted in a preheated oven at 200ºC until it reached 75ºC in the geometric center. The loin was then weighed again, and the difference between the two weights was the CL. The shear force (SF) test was then run using the leftover cooking samples. Using 2.5-cm-thick steaks four cylinders (1.27-cm diameter) were removed from each sample, longitudinal to the direction of the muscle fibers, and sheared perpendicularly to the orientation of the fibers. The required cutting force was measured using Warner-Bratzler Shear Force equipment, with a load cell of 25 kgf and a speed of 20 cm/min. Regarding the chemical composition of the fresh meat (Semimembranosus muscle), the analyses of moisture, crude protein, ether extract, and ash were determined according to AOAC (1990)AOAC, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Official Analytical Chemists International..
Sensory analysis of meat (Longissimus lumborum) was performed using quantitative descriptive analysis, on an unstructured hedonic scale, as described by Ston & Sidel (2004)Ston H, Sidel J, 2004. Sensory evaluation practices, 3th Ed. California: Elsevier Academic Press. 408 pp.. In individual booths, 13 trained judges evaluated the attributes: overall evaluation, color, characteristic aroma, tenderness, juiciness and characteristic flavor. For the preparation of the meat samples, they were cooked in a preheated oven at 200ºC, up to 75ºC of the temperature of the geometric center, and later fractioned into cubes of 2.5 cm and 15 g of weight. The evaluation followed the experimental model of complete blocks so that each sample (one for animal) was evaluated in triplicate by each judge.
The experimental design was completely randomized, with the initial BW of the animals as a covariate. The analyzed variables were interpreted using an analysis of variance, at a significance level of 5%, using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS, 2009SAS, 2009. SAS/STAT: User’s guide, version 9.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.), according to the following model:
where Yij is the observed dependent variable; μ is the overall mean; Ti is the treatment effect (i = 1 to 3); β (Xij - X) is the covariate effect; and eij is the experimental error. The means were compared by Tukey’s test (p<0.05).
Results
⌅The DM and ME intakes presented differences according to the diets (p<0.05), being highest for Nopalea (Table 1). There was no effect of treatments (p>0.05) on slaughter BW, with a mean value of 34.4 kg. However, the content of the gastrointestinal tract, expressed in kg and as percentage of slaughter weight (%), was higher in animals fed the Tifton diet than in their counterparts (p<0.05).
| Item[1] | Diets | SEM[3] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton hay | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| BW (kg) | |||||
| Initial[2] | 22.4 | 22.6 | 22.8 | - | - |
| At slaughter (kg) | 33.7±2.84 | 35.0±4.55 | 34.6±3.79 | 0.641 | 0.621 |
| Daily intake (g/d) | |||||
| Dry matter[2] | 1129±149b | 1290±175a | 1172±176ab | 0.030 | 0.010 |
| Metabolizable energy | 2.63±68b | 3.31±130a | 2.67±103b | 0.028 | 0.009 |
| Carcass characteristics | |||||
| EBW (kg) | 26.9±2.75b | 30.4±4.08a | 30.1±3.14a | 0.620 | 0.009 |
| GITC (kg) | 6.79±1.38a | 4.68±0.79b | 4.54±0.85b | 0.244 | 0.001 |
| GITC:BW at slaughter (%) | 20.1±3.87a | 13.3±1.77b | 13.1±1.64b | 0.689 | 0.001 |
| HCW (kg) | 15.3±1.77b | 17.3±2.42a | 17.1±1.97a | 0.376 | 0.020 |
| CCW (kg) | 14.6±1.70b | 16.6±2.37a | 16.4±1.86a | 0.366 | 0.019 |
| CL (kg) | 0.70±0.11 | 0.67±0.08 | 0.68±0.13 | 0.019 | 0.742 |
| CL (%) | 4.60±0.52a | 3.90±0.56b | 3.97±0.39b | 0.098 | 0.003 |
| HCY (%) | 45.4±2.88b | 49.4±2.28a | 49.4±1.82a | 0.503 | 0.001 |
| CCY (%) | 42.8±2.82b | 47.1±2.21a | 47.5±1.78a | 0.503 | 0.001 |
| BY (%) | 56.9±1.20 | 57.1±2.24 | 56.9±1.63 | 0.291 | 0.948 |
| LMA (cm²) | 9.98±1.72b | 12.6±3.26a | 11.0±1.94ab | 0.435 | 0.047 |
| SFT (mm) | 0.63±0.15 | 0.61±0.19 | 0.57±0.16 | 0.028 | 0.870 |
| pH 0h | 6.97±0.10 | 6.93±0.18 | 6.91±0.18 | 0.026 | 0.648 |
| pH 24h | 5.43±0.10 | 5.43±0.08 | 5.49±0.10 | 0.016 | 0.295 |
[1] EBW: empty body weight. GTIC: gastrointestinal tract content. HCW: hot carcass weight. CCW: cold carcass weight. CL: cooling losses. HCY: hot carcass yield. CCY: cold carcass yield. BY: biological yield. LMA: Longissimus muscle area. SFT: subcutaneous fat thickness. [2] Values obtained by Lopes et al. (2020)Lopes LA, Ferreira MA, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Barbosa RA, Munhame JA, 2020. Intake, digestibility, and performance of lambs fed spineless cactus cv. Orelha de Elefante Mexicana. As-Australas J Anim Sci 33: 1284-1291. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0328. [3] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
The use of spineless cactus (Nopalea and Opuntia) increased the EBW, HCW, CCW, HCY and CCY yields (p<0.05). The CL, expressed in kg, did not present differences (p>0.05), with an average of 0.68 kg; however, expressed as proportion of carcass weight, was highest for lambs from the Tifton hay treatment (p<0.05).
The Nopalea diet led to an increase in the LMA, compared to the Tifton diet (p<0.05). In contrast to the other treatments, the carcass of lambs fed Opuntia did not exhibit any differences in the LMA (p>0.05). Additionally, SFT did not differ between treatments (p>0.05).
In relation to the commercial meat cuts (Table 2), there was no effect of the diets on the absolute weights of the shoulder, neck, saw, and leg cuts (p>0.05). The ribs and loin were heavier for lambs from the Nopalea treatment, compared to Tifton hay (p<0.05); however, lambs from the Opuntia treatment did not differ from the others (p>0.05). The yields of cuts were not influenced (p>0.05) by treatments and, they were, on average: shoulder: 19.6%; ribs: 19.5%; saw: 8.1%; loin: 9.0%; and leg: 34.8%.
| Weight (kg) | Diets | SEM[1] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton hay | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| Shoulder | 1.38±0.12 | 1.56±0.21 | 1.50±0.28 | 0.039 | 0.145 |
| Neck | 0.61±0.23 | 0.70±0.14 | 0.70±0.11 | 0.029 | 0.329 |
| Ribs | 1.35±0.20b | 1.61±0.24a | 1.48±0.21ab | 0.040 | 0.007 |
| Saw | 0.57±0.10 | 0.63±0.11 | 0.65±0.10 | 0.018 | 0.156 |
| Loin | 0.61±0.09b | 0.73±0.17a | 0.70±0.08ab | 0.022 | 0.042 |
| Leg | 2.50±0.31 | 2.72±0.41 | 2.70±0.37 | 0.063 | 0.265 |
[1] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
The spineless cactus treatments (Nopalea and Opuntia) led to a higher fat deposition (kg and %; p<0.05) and lower muscle/fat ratio (p<0.05). The weight and proportion of the other tissues in the leg did not vary (p>0.05) (Table 3).
| Item | Diets | SEM[1] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton hay | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| Muscle (kg) | 1.62±0.20 | 1.74±0.29 | 1.72±0.25 | 0.042 | 0.476 |
| Muscle (%) | 65.8±2.17 | 66.8±2.84 | 66.3±1.89 | 0.392 | 0.775 |
| Bone (kg) | 0.51±0.05 | 0.53±0.08 | 0.51±0.09 | 0.013 | 0.834 |
| Bone (%) | 20.7±1.42 | 20.2±1.35 | 19.7±1.80 | 0.274 | 0.489 |
| Total fat (kg) | 0.16±0.05b | 0.22±0.05a | 0.22±0.06a | 0.012 | 0.001 |
| Subcutaneous fat (SF; kg) | 0.12±0.04b | 0.16±0.04a | 0.15±0.05ab | 0.008 | 0.031 |
| Intermuscular fat (IF, kg) | 0.04±0.01b | 0.06±0.02a | 0.06±0.02a | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Total fat (%) | 6.65±1.74b | 8.73±1.40a | 8.76±1.83a | 0.319 | 0.004 |
| Other tissues (kg) | 0.19±0.03 | 0.11±0.04 | 0.13±0.03 | 0.006 | 0.335 |
| Other tissues (%) | 6.70±0.91 | 4.21±1.56 | 5.07±1.17 | 0.216 | 0.274 |
| Muscle:Bone ratio | 1.88±0.29 | 1.89±0.21 | 1.97±0.20 | 0.040 | 0.668 |
| Muscle:Fat ratio | 5.35±1.42a | 3.74±0.64b | 3.95±0.88b | 0.209 | 0.001 |
| SF:IF ratio | 3.19±0.97 | 3.04±1.45 | 2.39±0.60 | 0.187 | 0.195 |
| Leg muscle index | 0.40±0.03 | 0.42±0.03 | 0.41±0.05 | 0.006 | 0.706 |
[1] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
The use of spineless cactus increased the weight of the lambs’ livers (p<0.05; Table 4). When evaluated as a percentage of BW, liver weight was 2.24% for the lambs that received the Nopalea treatment, 2.16% for Opuntia, and 1.87% for Tifton hay. The weights of the rumen and reticulum of Opuntia-fed lambs and weight of the internal fat of lambs fed Nopalea were higher than those fed Tifton hay (p<0.05).
| Item[1] | Diets | SEM[2] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton hay | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| Organs (kg) | |||||
| Heart | 0.14±0.19 | 0.16±0.24 | 0.15±0.25 | 0.004 | 0.064 |
| Liver | 0.50±0.60b | 0.68±0.12a | 0.65±0.12a | 0.022 | 0.001 |
| Kidneys | 0.98±0.18 | 0.11±0.14 | 0.11±0.27 | 0.004 | 0.228 |
| Spleen | 0.60±0.10 | 0.73±0.14 | 0.70±0.17 | 0.003 | 0.093 |
| Pancreas | 0.57±0.13 | 0.58±0.18 | 0.80±0.12 | 0.002 | 0.402 |
| Lungs | 0.34±0.38 | 0.37±0.50 | 0.38±0.89 | 0.011 | 0.386 |
| Organs:EBW (%) | 4.50±0.37 | 4.79±0.26 | 4.76±0.47 | 0.067 | 0.148 |
| Viscera (kg) | |||||
| Rumen | 0.67±0.73b | 0.77±0.12ab | 0.85±0.10a | 0.021 | 0.002 |
| Reticulum | 0.11±0.24b | 0.13±0.25ab | 0.15±0.28a | 0.005 | 0.039 |
| Omasum | 0.99±0.25 | 0.11±0.22 | 0.12±0.27 | 0.008 | 0.111 |
| Abomasum | 0.14±0.31 | 0.14±0.34 | 0.15±0.24 | 0.021 | 0.399 |
| Small intestine | 0.64±0.85 | 0.70±0.82 | 0.71±0.78 | 0.014 | 0.135 |
| Large intestine | 0.33±0.30 | 0.34±0.59 | 0.36±0.60 | 0.009 | 0.306 |
| Viscera:EBW (%) | 7.77±0.71ab | 7.54±0.59b | 8.07±0.43a | 0.104 | 0.045 |
| Inedible offals (kg) | |||||
| Skin | 2.34±0.21b | 2.83±0.44a | 2.57±0.22ab | 0.062 | 0.009 |
| Blood | 1.27±0.22 | 1.30±0.22 | 1.22±0.24 | 0.038 | 0.634 |
| Head | 1.97±0.17 | 1.99±0.22 | 1.96±0.19 | 0.033 | 0.952 |
| Offals:EBW (%) | 23.9±1.14a | 23.1±0.81a | 22.0±0.70b | 0.199 | 0.001 |
| Total internal fat | 0.91±0.34b | 1.46±0.47a | 1.28±0.38ab | 0.077 | 0.004 |
| Internal fat:EBW (%) | 3.33±0.95b | 4.73±1.24a | 4.25±1.07ab | 0.208 | 0.013 |
[1] EBW: empty body weight. [2] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
There was no difference in the physicochemical parameters of the meat (Longissimus lumborum) (p>0.05; Table 5). Concerning the chemical composition, the groups differed only for EE and moisture, with higher values of EE for meat from animals fed with spineless cactus (p<0.05). The meat from lambs fed Tifton hay diet showed higher moisture compared to Nopalea diet (p<0.05).
| Item | Diets | SEM[2] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| Lightness (L*) | 38.7±1.87 | 39.6±1.61 | 39.7±2.51 | 0.355 | 0.508 |
| Redness (a*) | 16.0±1.43 | 16.9±1.69 | 16.7±1.96 | 0.294 | 0.427 |
| Yellowness (b*) | 8.78±1.16 | 9.77±1.12 | 9.58±1.31 | 0.213 | 0.159 |
| pH | 5.43±0.10 | 5.43±0.08 | 5.49±0.10 | 0.016 | 0.295 |
| WHC (%) [1] | 25.9±2.70 | 25.4±3.20 | 25.5±3.18 | 0.507 | 0.922 |
| Cooking loss (%) | 43.4±2.59 | 43.7±2.49 | 42.4±2.80 | 0.454 | 0.499 |
| Shear force (kg/cm²) | 2.18±0.27 | 2.18±0.51 | 2.30±0.64 | 0.084 | 0.257 |
| Ash (%) | 1.24±0.35 | 1.33±0.26 | 1.38±0.38 | 0.057 | 0.653 |
| Crude protein (%) | 18.5±0.47 | 18.9±0.80 | 19.1±1.06 | 0.144 | 0.217 |
| Ether extract (%) | 1.71±0.47b | 2.31±0.50a | 2.28±0.54a | 0.093 | 0.020 |
| Moisture (%) | 78.2±0.67a | 76.9±1.06b | 77.4±1.43ab | 0.207 | 0.020 |
[1] WHC: water-holding capacity (%). [2] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
In the sensory evaluation of meat (Longissimus lumborum), there was no difference between treatments for the parameters: general appearance, characteristic sheep aroma, tenderness, and juiciness (p>0.05; Table 6). However, the score attributed to meat color in the Opuntia treatment was higher, as well as the characteristic flavor of sheep meat for the Nopalea treatment, when compared to Tifton hay (p<0.05).
| Item | Diets | SEM[1] | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tifton | Nopalea | Opuntia | |||
| Overall evaluation | 7.09±1.12 | 7.28±0.99 | 7.21±1.03 | 0.091 | 0.226 |
| Color | 5.21±1.56b | 5.30±1.69ab | 5.54±1.38a | 0.142 | 0.037 |
| Characteristic aroma | 3.19±1.73 | 3.33±1.81 | 3.36±1.79 | 0.163 | 0.317 |
| Tenderness | 6.58±1.76 | 6.75±1.80 | 6.54±1.78 | 0.164 | 0.563 |
| Juiciness | 4.67±2.24 | 4.90±2.27 | 4.64±2.36 | 0.211 | 0.251 |
| Characteristic flavor | 3.30±1.83b | 3.81±2.04a | 3.46±1.92ab | 0.182 | 0.009 |
[1] SEM: standard error of the mean. The averages in the lines followed by different letters are statistically different by the Tukey test at 5% probability.
Discussion
⌅In general, the use of spineless cactus (Nopalea and Opuntia) increased the EBW, HCW, and CCW of growing lambs. According to Batista et al. (2009Batista AMV, Ribeiro Neto AC, Lucena RB, Santos DC, Dubeux JCB, Mustafa AF, 2009. Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of spineless cactus grown in Northeastern Brazil. Rangel Ecol Manag 62: 297-301. https://doi.org/10.2111/07-099R1.1) and Siqueira et al. (2017Siqueira MC, Ferreira MA, Monnerat JPIS, Silva JL, Costa CT, Conceição MG, et al., 2017. Optimizing the use of spineless cactus in the diets of cattle: Total and partial digestibility, fiber dynamics and ruminal parameters. Anim Feed Sci Technol 226: 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.12.006), this cactus’s high degradability, low content of fibrous carbohydrates, and high content of non-fibrous carbohydrates, along with its high levels of total digestible nutrients, maximize the capacity for ruminal fermentation; thus, it is probable that there was an increase of nutrient flow in the tissues of the animals fed spineless cactus, favoring muscular anabolism (Ribeiro et al., 2017Ribeiro JS, Santos LL, Lima Júnior DM, Mariz TMA, Ladeira MM, Azevedo PS, et al., 2017. Spineless cactus associated with Tifton hay or sugarcane bagasse may replace corn silage in sheep diets. Trop Anim Health Prod 49: 995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1288-6).
The highest gastrointestinal tract weight in grass hay-fed animals can be attributed to the lower effective rumen degradability of hay DM (365.7 g/kg DM; Jobim et al., 2011Jobim CC, Ferreira GA, Bumbieris Junior VH, Calixto Junior M, Santos GT, 2011. Cinética de degradação ruminal dos fenos de alfafa e Tifton-85 e da silagem de milho. Semin Cienc Agrar 32: 747-758. https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n2p747), compared to spineless cactus (711 g/kg DM; Batista et al., 2009Batista AMV, Ribeiro Neto AC, Lucena RB, Santos DC, Dubeux JCB, Mustafa AF, 2009. Chemical composition and ruminal degradability of spineless cactus grown in Northeastern Brazil. Rangel Ecol Manag 62: 297-301. https://doi.org/10.2111/07-099R1.1). Still, in this context, the greater weight of the gastrointestinal tract in the lambs that received grass hay reflected negatively on the carcass yields.
It is worth emphasizing that the native breeds that were selected for tropical or semi-arid tropical regions, where food availability is seasonal, require the deposition and rapid mobilization of body reserves (especially of internal fatty tissues), as an important factor for survival under these conditions (Mirkena et al., 2010Mirkena T, Duguma G, Haile A, Tibbo M, Okeyo AM, Wurzinger M, et al., 2010. Genetics of adaptation in domestic farm animals: a review. Liv Sci 132: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2010.05.003; Regadas Filho et al., 2013Regadas Filho JGL, Pereira ES, Pimentel PG, Villarroel ABS, Medeiros AN, Fontenele RM, 2013. Body composition and net energy requirements for Santa Inês lambs. Small Rumin Res 109: 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.07.011). For this reason, it has been reported (Ribeiro et al., 2017Ribeiro JS, Santos LL, Lima Júnior DM, Mariz TMA, Ladeira MM, Azevedo PS, et al., 2017. Spineless cactus associated with Tifton hay or sugarcane bagasse may replace corn silage in sheep diets. Trop Anim Health Prod 49: 995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1288-6; Oliveira et al., 2018Oliveira JPF, Ferreira MA, Alves AMSV, Melo ACC, Andrade IB, Urbano SA, et al., 2018. Carcass characteristics of lambs fed spineless cactus as a replacement for sugarcane. As-Australas J Anim Sci 31: 529-536. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0375; Cardoso et al., 2021Cardoso DB, Medeiros GR, Guim A, Azevedo PS, Suassuna JMA, Júnior DML, et al., 2021. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of lambs fed with increasing levels of spineless cactus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 272: 114788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114788) that the Santa Inês breed accumulates substantial amounts of internal fat despite having low subcutaneous fat deposition. These reports are consistent with the findings of this work. Although they had high internal fat deposition, lambs fed Opuntia did not differ from the Tifton hay treatment. This allows us to infer that they had smaller losses with slaughter by-products (by-products: EBW) and greater energy use efficiency of the Opuntia diet compared to the Nopalea diet.
The liver plays a central role in the metabolism of organic acids and dietary proteins. It may have hypertrophied to process the higher flow of these compounds in the body of the animals fed spineless cactus (Hentz et al., 2016Hentz F, Kozloski GV, Zeni D, Brun MV, Stefanello S, 2016. Relationship between level of forage intake, blood flow and oxygen consumption by splanchnic tissues of sheep fed a tropical grass forage. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr 5: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12519; Ribeiro et al., 2017Ribeiro JS, Santos LL, Lima Júnior DM, Mariz TMA, Ladeira MM, Azevedo PS, et al., 2017. Spineless cactus associated with Tifton hay or sugarcane bagasse may replace corn silage in sheep diets. Trop Anim Health Prod 49: 995-1000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1288-6; Cardoso et al., 2021Cardoso DB, Medeiros GR, Guim A, Azevedo PS, Suassuna JMA, Júnior DML, et al., 2021. Growth performance, carcass traits and meat quality of lambs fed with increasing levels of spineless cactus. Anim Feed Sci Technol 272: 114788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114788).
According to Costa et al. (2017)Costa CTF, Ferreira MA, Campos JMS, Silva JL, Andrade RPX, Conceição MG, 2017. Multiple supplements containing spineless cactus enriched with urea for cattle. Acta Sci - Anim Sci 39: 363-369. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v39i4.34427, the use of spineless cactus ‘Miúda’ enriched with 1.5% urea, potentiated the maximum concentration of acetate in the rumen, estimated to be 70.9 mmol/mL. Thus, it is possible that, in the present study, the same food, which promoted higher DM and TDN intakes, resulted in the higher fermentation of non-fibrous carbohydrates and energy availability in short-chain fatty acids; this was mainly in the form of acetate, the fundamental short-chain fatty acid used in the energetic supply of the visceral tissues and the main substrate for lipogenesis in adipose tissue (Campbell et al., 2016Campbell EMG, Sanders JO, Lunt DK, Gill CA, Taylor JF, Davis SK, et al., 2016. Adiposity, lipogenesis, and fatty acid composition of subcutaneous and intramuscular adipose tissues of Brahman and Angus crossbred cattle. J Anim Sci 94: 1415-1425. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9954), resulting in a higher visceral energy reserve.
The development of the rumen and reticulum can be influenced by the proportion of neutral detergent fiber in the diet, causing the filling and retention of food in these compartments, favoring muscle development. However, this behavior was observed inversely in the present study. It is worth mentioning that the Opuntia diet showed higher humidity and, as a result, higher fresh matter intake (6159 g/day). This could have led to distension and encouraged the increased formation of these compartments. In contrast, they were 1005 and 5494 g/day in the Nopalea and control diets, respectively. Silva et al. (2020)Silva TGP, Batista AMV, Guim A, Silva Júnior VA, Carvalho FFR, Barros MEG, et al., 2020. Histomorphometric changes of the fore-stomach of lambs fed diets containing spineless cactus genotypes resistant to Dactylopius sp. Trop Anim Health Prod 52: 1299-1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-019-02129-0 reported that the weight of the stomach was greater in lambs fed with spineless cactus, regardless of genotype. In addition, they suggested that greater papillary development may induce an increase in the mass of the fore-stomach, especially the rumen.
The difference in the chemical composition of the meat between the treatments can be related to the increase in EBW and the greater deposition of fat in animals fed with spineless cactus. Because of its energy content, spineless cactus in the diet of lambs increases fattening of carcass and the EE of meat (Moura et al., 2020Moura MSC, Guim A, Batista AMV, Maciel MV, Cardoso DB, Lima Júnior DM, et al., 2020. The inclusion of spineless cactus in the diet of lambs increases fattening of the carcass. Meat Sci 160: 107975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.107975). According to Abdullah & Qudsieh (2008)Abdullah YA, Qudsieh RI, 2008. Carcass characteristics of Awassi ram lambs slaughtered at different weights. Livest Sci 117: 165-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.12.020, the decrease in meat moisture content is related to increased fat deposition, which is a late-maturing tissue that takes the place of muscle moisture and leads to a decrease in the amount of water in the muscles. The higher degree of intermuscular and subcutaneous adiposity of the Nopalea treatment may have intensified the perception of the characteristic flavor attribute in the sensory evaluation of sheep meat.
In conclusion, both genotypes of spineless cacti increase the weight, yield, and fattening of feedlot lamb carcasses. For lambs raised in carmine cochineal-infested locations, the genotype ‘Orelha de Elefante Mexicana’ offers a healthier option.