Introduction
⌅The
rapidly growing population of the world has increased the demand for
cheap and affordable chicken meat, eggs, and poultry products. Pomaah et al. (2023)Pomaah
AN, Abdallah N, Kurşun K, Baylan M, 2023. Egg production and
consumption: a case study in Teshie municipality (Ghana). OKÜ Fen Bil
Ens: 12 (6 Ek Sayı):454-66. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1265446
reported that the demand for poultry products have increased
tremendously due to increasing levels of income and standard of living.
This has increased the search for the production of other alternative
poultry species such as quails (Ozkan et al., 2024Ozkan
B, Abdallah N, Boga YE, Kursun K, Baylan M, 2024. The effect of breeder
body mass on laying performance, egg quality, and hatching traits of
Japanese quail. SJAR: 22(4):8. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/202422-20998
).
Quails are one of the fastest-growing alternative poultry species and
there are various genotypes or strains of quails worldwide. These birds
are normally characterized by their feather color or country of origin.
By plumage color, the most common are brown, black, grey, and golden
quails, and by country of origin, they are classified as Japanese
quails, European quails, Pharaoh quails, and Manchurian Golden breeds.
However, the most widely known and most commonly used for experimental
research is the Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica).
The
commercial production of Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica) as an
alternative poultry specie is gaining a significant interest compared to
the production of other alternative poultry species (Abdallah et al., 2024Abdallah
N, Kursun K, Baylan M, 2024. Effect of thermal manipulation during
embryogenesis on pre and post-hatch performance of stored hatching eggs
of Japanese quails. TURJAF: 12(12):2483-90. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i12.2483-2490.6926
). Japanese quails have attracted attention as an important species due to the unique flavour of their meat and eggs (Kayang et al., 2004Kayang
BB, Vignal A, Inoue‐Murayama M, Miwa M, Monvoisin JL, Ito S, Minvielle
F, 2004. A first‐generation microsatellite linkage map of the Japanese
quail. Anim. Genet: 35(3): 195-200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2004.01135.x
).
The small body size, low maintenance cost, high egg production, short
generation interval, and disease resistance of the Japanese quails make
these birds excellent laboratory animals (Baumgartner, 1994Baumgartner J, 1994. Japanese quail production, breeding and geneGolden quails. Worlds Poult Sci J: 50(3): 227-235.
; Yalcin et al., 1995Yalcin S, Oğuz I, Ötleş S, 1995. Carcase characteristics of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) slaughtered at different ages. Br Poult Sci: 36(3): 393-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669508417786
).
Quail production is relatively easy and their housing requirements are
less complex compared to the housing requirements of chickens (Capitan, 2003Capitan
S, 2003. The science and pracGolden quailse of quail production. CA
Publication Office University of the Philippines Los Baños College,
Laguna 4031 Philippines.
; Lambio, 2010Lambio, AL, 2010. Poultry Production in the Tropics. University of the Philippines, Los Banos, Laguna.
). Indeed, Bagh et al. (2016)Bagh
J, Panigrahi B, Panda N, Pradhan CR, Mallik BK, Majhi B, Rout SS, 2016.
Body weight, egg production, and egg quality traits of gray, brown, and
white varieties of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) in
coastal climaGolden quails condition of Odisha. Vet World: 9(8): 832-836.
reported that in India, the Japanese quail is a promising poultry
species for rural farmers due to its minimal capital and management
requirements.
In terms of size, Japanese quails are the smallest farmed poultry species (Panda & Singh, 1990Panda B, Singh RP, 1990. Development in processing quail. Worlds Poult Sci J: 46: 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1079/WPS19900022
) and have become highly important for their eggs and meat (Baumgartner, 1994Baumgartner J, 1994. Japanese quail production, breeding and geneGolden quails. Worlds Poult Sci J: 50(3): 227-235.
; Dahouda et al., 2013Dahouda
M, Adjolohoun S, Montchowui EH, Senou M, Hounsou NMD, Amoussa S,
Vidjannagni DS, Abou M, Toleba SS, 2013. Growth performance of quails
(Coturnix coturnix) fed on diets containing either animal or vegetable
protein sources. Int. J. Poult. Sci: 12(7): 396-400.
).
Quails are characterised by faster growth, and rapid reproduction,
coupled with a higher efficiency in converting feed into eggs and meat (Randall & Bolla, 2008Randall M, Bolla G, 2008. Raising Japanese quail. Primefacts: 602: 1-5.
).
Eggs are an important source of nutrients (Kurşun et al. 2024aKurşun
K, Abdallah N, Baylan M, 2024a. Egg quality characteristics of sussex
chickens reared under the housing conditions of Cukurova University
farm. In BIO Web of Conf Adana (Turkiye), October 4-6. pp:85
)
and it has been reported that eggs of Japanese quails are rich in
minerals, vitamins, and antioxidants with a nutritional value 3-4 times
higher than chicken eggs (Lalwani, 2011Lalwani,
2011 cited from Tunsaringkarn T, Tungjaroenchai W, Siriwong W, 2013.
Nutrient benefits of quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. IJSRP:
3(5): 1-8.
; Tunsaringkarn et al., 2013Tunsaringkarn
T, Tungjaroenchai W, Siriwong W, 2013. Nutrient benefits of quail
(Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. IJSRP: 3(5): 1-8.
). Additionally, a comparative analysis by Ioniţă et al. (2008)Ioniţă
L, Popescu-Miclosanu E, Roibu C, Custura I, 2008. Bibliographical study
regarding the quails meat quality in comparison to the chicken and duck
meat. Lucrari Stiintifice: 56:224-229.
revealed that the meat of quails has the highest amount of protein and
the lowest amount of calories compared to duck and broiler meat.
According to Vali (2008)Vali N, 2008. The Japanese quail: a review. Int J Poult Sci: 7:925-931.
, quail meat is lean and its low cholesterol content makes it a superior economic source of animal protein.
Similar to broiler chickens and layer hens, the housing system (Roshdy et al., 2010Roshdy
M, Khalil HA, Hanafy AM, Mady ME, 2010. Productive and reproductive
traits of Japanese quails as affected by two housing system. Egypt Poult
Sci J: 30(1):55- 67.
) and the strain of the quail are
some of the most important factors affecting growth and welfare
performance as well as carcass and meat quality trait of quails. For
instance, Islam et al. (2014)Islam
MS, Faruque S, Khatun H, Islam MN, 2014. "Effects of quail genotypes on
hatchability traits, body weight and egg production. JBAS: 38 (2):
219-224. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v38i2.21346
identified the effect of quail genotype on body weight at hatch,
highest and lowest in Japanese quail genotype and black quail genotype,
respectively. Uçar et al. (2024)Uçar
A, 2024. The Effects of Rearing Systems on Incubation, Egg Production
and Quality Traits in Pharaoh Quails. TURJAF:12(8): 1388-1395. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v12i8.1388-1395.6936
also identified lower body weight in quails housed in litter systems
compared to those housed in either conventional or enriched cages. In
addition, better feed conversion efficiency in brown quails at 2 wk of
age and in white quails at 6 wk of age were identified (Tawfeq, 2024Tawfeq,
E. M. (2024). Comparison of the production performance of some
phenotypic groups and their crosses of quail birds. JAEVS: 8(3): 26-31. https://doi.org/10.26389/AJSRP.M140724
).
Therefore, this research investigated the effect of housing system and strain on growth performance and carcass trait of quails.
Material and methods
⌅Animal material and experimental area
⌅The experiment was carried out at the Research Unit of the Çukurova University. The animal material consisted of 720-day-old quails (360 brown and 360 golden quail strains).
Experimental groups
⌅The experimental groups consisted of brown and golden quails raised in a litter system, slatted floors, or cages. The quails reared in cages were reared in chick cages for the first 2 wk of age and then transferred to grower cages from the 3 wk of age until slaughter age. The dimensions of the chick cage were 28 cm x 92 cm x 44 cm (height, length, and width, respectively). In the litter system, 1 m2 plywood enclosures were used with 6-8 cm sawdust as the litter material. Additionally, in the slatted floor system, 8 cm height slatted floor was used. The dimensions of the litter system and the slatted floor housing systems were 200 cm x 200 cm x 200 cm for height, length, and width, respectively. There were three replicates per housing system and the number of quails in each replicate pen is given in Table 1.
| Quail Strain | HS | Number of replicates | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | Total | ||
| Number of quails per replicate | |||||
| Brown | C | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 |
| LS | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 | |
| ST | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 | |
| Golden | C | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 |
| LS | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 | |
| ST | 40 | 40 | 40 | 120 | |
| Total | 720 | ||||
HS (Housing system), C (Cage), LS (Litter system), ST (Slatted floor).
Feed material
⌅The experimental quails were fed a broiler diet containing 22% crude protein and 300 kcal/kg metabolic energy during the experimental period. Feed and water were provided ad libitum.
Measurement of growth parameters
⌅The body weight and feed intake were identified weekly using a sensitive electronic scale (SCALTEC SBA 41, Germany) with a precision of 0.1 g. The body weight gain was calculated by subtracting the initial body weight from the subsequent body weight. The feed intake was calculated by subtracting the initial feed provided at the beginning of a particular week from the remaining feed at the end of that week. The weekly feed conversion ratio was calculated by dividing the feed intake of a given week by the average body weight gain of that week. The formula below was used to evaluate the respective parameters.
-
Body weight gain (g) = Final body weight - Initial body weight
-
Feed consumption (g) = Total feed given - Feed left
Evaluation of carcass traits
⌅Ten quails per replicate summing up to 30 and 90 quails per housing system and strain were slaughtered, respectively. The weight of the carcass, heart, liver, gizzard, and non-edible organs were measured with an electronic scale (SCALTEC SBA 41, Germany) with a precision of 0.1 g. The dressing percentage was identified using the formula below.
Statistical analysis
⌅Statistical analysis to evaluate the mean difference between the strain effects was performed by t-test analysis. The main effect of rearing systems was evaluated by a one-way ANOVA test. The interaction effect of the of strain and the housing system was determined by the Tukey multiple comparison test. The significant level was considered at P≤0.05. SPSS version 22 was used for the statistical analyses.
The following linear model was used in the analysis.
Where;
Results
⌅The effect of the strain on hatching weight and post-hatch performance trait is given in Table 2. While the strain had no significant effect on body weight at hatch and at 5 wk of age (P>0.05), the brown quails had superior body weight than the golden quails between 1 wk and 4 wk of age (P≤0.05). However, the body weight gain did not statistically differ between the strains throughout the experimental period (P>0.05).
| BW (g) | Quail Strain | Age of quails (weeks) | |||||
| 0* | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Brown | 8.96 ±0.05 | 36.06 ±0.36 | 87.64 ±0.66 | 162.09 ±1.03 | 229.26 ±1.51 | 274.49 ±1.76 | |
| Golden | 8.93 ±0.05 | 33.45 ±0.36 | 83.46 ±0.70 | 153.82 ±1.06 | 222.66 ±1.32 | 270.35 ±1.62 | |
| P value | 0.674 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.086 | |
| BWG (g) | Brown | - | 26.58 ±1.58 | 51.67 ±0.40 | 73.95 ±1.84 | 67.72 ±1.06 | 43.62 ±3.70 |
| Golden | - | 24.48 ±0.47 | 49.50 ±0.62 | 70.37 ±1.11 | 68.85 ±1.10 | 47.60 ±1.28 | |
| P value | - | 0.272 | 0.086 | 0.115 | 0.467 | 0.326 | |
| FI (g) | Brown quails | - | 6086.17 ±619.76 | 10533.73 ±1060.63 | 4492.33 ±515.41 | 6657.11 ±568.00 | 8095.78 ±854.27 |
| Golden | - | 5912.33 ±589.28 | 11262.00 ±1258.20 | 5518.78 ±305.50 | 8135.22 ±229.96 | 9792.89 ±382.84 | |
| P value | - | 0.849 | 0.681 | 0.106 | 0.028 | 0.089 | |
| FCR | Brown | - | 2.80±0.52 | 2.39±0.13 | 2.08±0.06 | 3.44±0.10 | 3.40±0.39 |
| Golden | - | 2.32±0.27 | 1.96±0.14 | 2.10±0.09 | 3.19±0.11 | 3.50±0.24 | |
| P value | - | 0.465 | 0.089 | 0.831 | 0.099 | 0.012 | |
*0 (Body weight at hatch); BW (Body weight), BWG (Body weight gain); FI (Feed intake), FCR (Feed conversion ratio).
Additionally, the feed intake at 1 wk, 2 wk, 3 wk and 5 wk of age did not statistically differ between the strains (P>0.05) however, at 4 wk of age, the golden quails had a significantly higher feed intake than the brown quails (P≤0.05). Similarly, between 1 wk and 4 wk of age, the feed conversion ratio did not significantly vary between the strains (P>0.05) however, the feed conversion efficiency of the brown quails was better than that of the golden quails at 5 wk of age (P≤0.05).
The effects of the housing systems on body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion efficiency are given in Table 3. The body weight was significantly higher in quails reared in cages between 1 wk and 5 wk of age (P≤0.05). The least body weight throughout the experimental period was identified in the quails housed in slatted floors. While the body weight gain was statistically higher in quails reared in cages at 3 wk and 5 wk of age (P≤0.05), the quails housed in slatted floors had the highest significant body weight gain at 4 wk of age (P≤0.05). Feed intake was significantly higher in quails reared in the litter system between 1 wk and 2 wk of age (P≤0.05) however, between 3 wk and 5wk of age, the quails housed in cages had the statistically highest feed intake (P≤0.05). Additionally, feed conversion efficiency was significantly better in quails housed in slatted floors and litter system between 3 wk and 4 wk of age, respectively (P≤0.05).
| BW | HS | Age of quails (weeks) | ||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| C | 36.32±0.36 | 86.90±0.71 | 163.34±1.14 | 229.54 ±1.69 | 283.52±1.10 | |
| LS | 33.91±0.46 | 85.49±0.89 | 155.22±1.30 | 223.28±1.69 | 266.17±1.89 | |
| ST | 33.05±0.54 | 82.88±0.97 | 152.34±1.43 | 223.22±1.81 | 264.88±2.04 | |
| P value | <0.001 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.011 | <0.001 | |
| BWG | C | 27.51±2.12 | 50.59±0.51 | 76.72±1.70 | 66.35±1.30 | 53.89±2.35 |
| LS | 24.98±0.76 | 51.74±0.70 | 69.80±1.14 | 67.78±0.90 | 42.53±2.84 | |
| ST | 24.10±0.26 | 50.18±1.29 | 69.97±1.56 | 70.71±1.16 | 40.41±2.14 | |
| P value | 0.302 | 0.524 | 0.008 | 0.044 | 0.003 | |
| FI | C | 5443.75 ±384.75 | 11803.60 ±103.60 | 6325.17 ±160.30 | 8725.50 ±171.43 | 11036.83 ±435.06 |
| LS | 7154.00 ±111.00 | 12218.00 ±971.00 | 5011.17 ±413.67 | 71643.00 ±464.90 | 8579.83 ±642.47 | |
| ST | 5400.00 ±235.00 | 8672.00 ±225.00 | 3680.33 ±351.06 | 6300.00 ±615.47 | 7216.33 ±658.59 | |
| P value | 0.030 | 0.040 | <0.001 | 0.006 | 0.001 | |
| FCR | C | 1.79±0.00 | 2.14±0.17 | 2.27±0.03 | 3.63±0.09 | 3.50±0.34 |
| LS | 2.81±0.26 | 2.25±0.16 | 2.10±0.99 | 3.07±0.08 | 3.06±0.44 | |
| ST | 3.08±0.45 | 2.15±0.46 | 1.91±0.06 | 3.25±0.10 | 3.65±1.47 | |
| P value | 0.109 | 0.956 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.411 | |
The interaction effect of the strain and the housing system is presented in Table 4. It was identified that the interaction effect of the housing system and the strain had no significant effect on the body weight, body weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio (P>0.05).
| Traits | P values |
|---|---|
| Body weight | 0.986 |
| Body weight gain | 0.891 |
| Feed intake | 0.904 |
| Feed conversion ratio | 0.678 |
The effect of housing systems and strains on carcass traits and internal organ weights are presented in Table 5. The dressing percentage was significantly higher in golden quails than in brown quails (P≤0.05) however, the heart weight was significantly higher in brown than in golden quails (P≤0.05). Additionally, carcass weight was significantly higher in quails housed in cages than in quails housed in other production systems (P≤0.05).
| Strain | Carcass weight (g) | Dressing percentage (%) | Heart (g) | Liver (g) | Gizzard (g) | NEO (g) | |
| Brown | 197.28±3.46 | 72.54±1.37 | 3.28±0.17 | 7.41±0.26 | 6.43±0.25 | 15.20±0.72 | |
| Golden | 202.48±3.15 | 75.44±0.40 | 2.82±0.08 | 7.15±0.31 | 6.69±0.20 | 16.42±0.77 | |
| P value | 0.271 | 0.046 | 0.014 | 0.524 | 0.425 | 0.251 | |
| HS | C | 208.37±3.10 | 72.56±0.76 | 3.21±0.19 | 7.83±0.35 | 6.63±0.23 | 17.41±1.16 |
| LS | 199.51±3.59 | 74.86±0.58 | 2.89±0.19 | 6.82±0.36 | 6.57±0.33 | 15.47±0.88 | |
| ST | 191.70±4.73 | 72.54±1.97 | 3.05±0.10 | 7.19±0.30 | 6.48±0.25 | 14.55±0.54 | |
| P value | 0.013 | 0.375 | 0.388 | 0.106 | 0.932 | 0.077 |
*HS
(Housing system), C (Cage), LS (Litter system), ST (Slatted floor), BW
(Body weight), BWG (Body weight gain), NEO (Non-edible organs).
Discussion
⌅In
the current study, the hatching weight did not significantly differ
between the quail strains however, the post-hatch body weight during the
rearing period was higher in brown quails than in golden quails. In
line with the findings of the current study, other authors have also
identified no significant effect of genotype on the hatching weight
between brown and golden quails or other quail genotypes (white and
grey) (Bagh et al., 2016Bagh
J, Panigrahi B, Panda N, Pradhan CR, Mallik BK, Majhi B, Rout SS, 2016.
Body weight, egg production, and egg quality traits of gray, brown, and
white varieties of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) in
coastal climaGolden quails condition of Odisha. Vet World: 9(8): 832-836.
; Nasr et al., 2017Nasr,
MA, Ali ESM, Hussein MA, 2017. Performance, carcass traits, meat
quality and amino acid profile of different Japanese quails strains. J
Food Sci Technol: 54:4189-4196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2881-4
; Kursun, 2022Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
) however, Islam et al. (2014)Islam
MS, Faruque S, Khatun H, Islam MN, 2014. "Effects of quail genotypes on
hatchability traits, body weight and egg production. JBAS: 38 (2):
219-224. https://doi.org/10.3329/jbas.v38i2.21346
identified the effect of quail genotype on hatching weight, highest in
Japanese quail genotype and lowest in black quail genotype. The higher
significant body weight observed in the brown quails between 1 wk and 4
wk of age is a direct reflection of their faster growth rate and
development. In line with the findings of the present study, different
authors (Al-Kafajy et al., 2018Al-Kafajy
FR, Al-Shuhaib MBS, Al-Jashami GS, Al-Thuwaini TM, 2018. Comparison of
three lines of Japanese quails revealed a remarkable role of plumage
color in the productivity performance determination. J World's Poult
Res: 8(4): 111-119.
; Chatoo & Al-Barzinji, 2022Chatoo
KB, Al-Barzinji YM, 2022. comparative study of production performance
among local quails. Iraqi J Agric Sci: 53(6): 1298-1304.
; Kursun, 2022Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
) have also identified higher body weight in brown quails than in golden quails or quails of other strains. However, Nasr et al. (2017)Nasr,
MA, Ali ESM, Hussein MA, 2017. Performance, carcass traits, meat
quality and amino acid profile of different Japanese quails strains. J
Food Sci Technol: 54:4189-4196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2881-4
reported that at 2, 4, and 6 wk of age brown quails had lower body weight compared to other quail strains.
In
the present study, the body weight gain did not significantly differ
between the strains throughout the experimental period. This contradicts
the findings of other studies (Hassan and Abd-Alsattar, 2016Hassan
KH, Abd-Alsattar AR, 2016. Effect of strain and strain-environment
interaction on productive performance of Japanese quail varieties. Am J
Biosci: 4(4): 49-52.
; Chatoo & Al-Barzinji, 2022Chatoo
KB, Al-Barzinji YM, 2022. comparative study of production performance
among local quails. Iraqi J Agric Sci: 53(6): 1298-1304.
; Kirrella et al., 2023Kirrella
AA, El-Kassas S, El-Naggar K, Galosi L, Biagini L, Rossi G, Di Cerbo A,
Alagawany M, Kassab M, Al Wakeel RA, 2023. Growing and laying
performance of two different-plumage color Japanese quail varieties
supplemented with corn silk in their diet. Poult Sci: 102(2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102360
)
that have reported higher significant body weight gain in brown quails
than in other quail strains. The differences in the results could be
related to the housing systems used in the various studies, nutrition,
and the performance of the other quail strains that were compared to the
brown and golden quails.
The present study was conducted in
winter and during the entire third week of the study there was an
electric problem in the poultry unit where the quails were reared. Due
to this reason, there were no heating systems which severely affected
the performance, especially the feed intake of the quails on that week.
However, the golden quails had better feed intake at 4 wk of age than
the brown quails. Poultry birds eat to meet their energy requirements
and it may be possible that the golden quails had higher energy
requirements for maintenance and growth (compensatory feed intake) after
the heating system was restored at 4 wk. Contrary to the findings of
the current study, Kursun (2022)Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
identified a significantly higher total (0-5wk) feed intake in brown quails than in golden quails. Chimezie et al. (2018)Chimezie
VO, Fayeye TR, Ayorinde KL, Komolafe OH, 2018. Influence of plumage
colour on hatchability and growth performance of Japanese quail
(Coturnix coturnix japonica). Trop Agric: 95(1): 77-83.
also reported no significant difference in feed intake between brown and other quail strains, however, Kirrella et al. (2023)Kirrella
AA, El-Kassas S, El-Naggar K, Galosi L, Biagini L, Rossi G, Di Cerbo A,
Alagawany M, Kassab M, Al Wakeel RA, 2023. Growing and laying
performance of two different-plumage color Japanese quail varieties
supplemented with corn silk in their diet. Poult Sci: 102(2): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102360
reported higher total feed intake in brown quails compared to quails of
other strains. The age of quails, housing system, stocking density, and
the environmental management may have accounted for the difference
between the results reported by the various authors.
Feed
conversion efficiency was better in brown quails than in golden quails
at 5 wk of age. The brown quails might have been characterised by a
better digestive system or gut health, leading to a better conversion
efficiency of feed into body mass however, Kursun (2022)Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
identified better feed conversion efficiency in golden than in brown quails.
In
the current study, the body weight of the quails housed in cages was
significantly higher than that of quails housed in the other production
systems between 1 wk and 5 wk of age. This confirms the findings of
previous studies (Meneeh and Fouda, 1992Meneeh S, Fouda MM, 1992. Performance of Japanese quail under two systems of management. Assiut Vet Med J: 26(52): 127-134. https://doi.org/10.21608/avmj.1992.187428
; Fouzder et al., 1999Fouzder
SK, Ali ML, Howlider MA, Khan NR, 1999. Performance of growing Japanese
quails in cages, on slatted floor and on littered floor. Indian J Anim
Sci: 69(12): 1059-1062.
; El-Sagheer et al., 2012El-Sagheer
M, El-Hammady HY, Farghly MFA, 2012. Productive and reproductive
performance of Japanese quail raised in batteries and on litter floor at
two densities under the prevailing climaGolden quails conditions in
Assiut Upper Egypt. In Summit and 6th Int Poult Conf, Alexandria
(Egypt), March 26 - 29. pp: 26-29.
; Kayastha et al., 2012Kayastha
TB, Dutta S, Pal VN, Kayastha RB, 2012. Performance of Japanese quail
on different management system. Indian J Animal Prod Manag: 28(3-4), 218-222.
; Razee et al., 2016Razee
A, Mahbub ASM, Miah MY, Hasnath MR, Hasan MK, Uddin MN,Belal SA, 2016.
Performance of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) on floor and
cage rearing system in Sylhet, Bangladesh: Comparative study. Iran J
Appl Anim Sci: 6(4): 931-936.
; Badawi, 2017Badawi YK, 2017. Effect of housing system on Japanese quail performance. J Anim Poult Prod: 8(12): 483-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/JAPPMU.2017.46068
; Gözet et al., 2019Gözet
B, Kursun K, Baylan M, Bulancak A, 2019. Effects of different breeding
systems on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Japanese
quails. YSU Congress, Prague (Czech Republic), August 6-8. pp:238-249.
)
that have identified higher body weight in quails housed in cages
compared to those housed in other production systems (floor, cage,
slatted floor). The higher body weight in the quails housed in the cage
system is a direct reflection of the high feed intake among quails in
this group. Additionally, it could be possible that the quails housed in
the cage system spent less energy due to the limited space for movement
which in turn led to the conversion of most of the energy in feed into
fat in the adipose tissue. This event could have also contributed to the
higher overall body weight identified in the quails housed in the cage
system. Furthermore, the quails in the cage system had no advantage of
expressing natural behaviours, which might have caused them to spend
more time expressing feeding behaviour than the quails in the other
housing systems (with some opportunities for expressing other more
natural and playful behaviours). However, EL-Sheikh et al. (2016)El-Sheikh
TM, Essa NM, Abdel-Kareem A AA, Elsagheer MA, 2016. Evaluation of
productive and reproductive performance of Japanese quails in floor pens
and conventional cages with different stocking densities. Egypt Poult
Sci J: 36(3): 669-683. https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2016.168800
and Muhammad & Mirza (2019)Muhammad
SD, Mirza RA, 2019. Effect of rearing system on performance, meat
quality and welfare in local quails. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci: 31: 116-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.21271/zjpas
reported higher body weight in quails housed in litter system than in quails housed in cages. Similarly, Gözet et al. (2019)Gözet
B, Kursun K, Baylan M, Bulancak A, 2019. Effects of different breeding
systems on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Japanese
quails. YSU Congress, Prague (Czech Republic), August 6-8. pp:238-249.
also identified higher body weight in quails housed in litter system at
1 wk of age than in quails housed in cages. The differences between the
results of the various studies may be related to the strain, age, and
stocking density.
The body weight gain in the present study was
significantly higher in quails housed in cages at 3 wk and 5 wk of age,
however, the quails housed in the slatted floor had the highest body
weight gain at 4 wk. The higher body weight gain in the quails housed in
cages at 3 wk and 5 wk could be attributed to their faster growth rate
and development. Additionally, the higher body weight gain observed in
the quails housed in the slatted floor system could be attributed to
compensatory growth due to the electrical management problems of the
previous week. It is therefore speculated that the quails housed in the
slatted floors were the most affected by the electrical problem and
therefore converted most of the energy in feed into body weight to
compensate for the previous loss after normal housing conditions were
restored. In line with both the findings of the current study,
significantly higher body weight gain in quails housed in non-cage
housing systems as well as in cages has been identified by several
authors (Kayastha et al., 2012Kayastha
TB, Dutta S, Pal VN, Kayastha RB, 2012. Performance of Japanese quail
on different management system. Indian J Animal Prod Manag: 28(3-4), 218-222.
; Badawi, 2017Badawi YK, 2017. Effect of housing system on Japanese quail performance. J Anim Poult Prod: 8(12): 483-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/JAPPMU.2017.46068
; Alindekon et al., 2019Alindekon
S, Abu OA, Babayemi JO, Agblo P, Adjovi-boco YM, 2019. Growth
performance of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) reared on
deep litter and cages in the hot humid tropics of Southern Bénin
Republic. Anim Prod: 20(3): 191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2018.20.3.674
).
Feed
intake was significantly higher in quails housed in litter system
between 1 wk and 2 wk of age however, the quails reared in cages had the
highest feed intake between 3 wk and 5 wk of age. The higher feed
intake between 1 and 2 wk in quails reared in the litter system may be
attributed to the fact that birds reared on wood shavings and in
non-cage rearing systems are stress-free and easily acclimatized to
their environment which could lead to a rapid return to the expression
of normal behaviour such as feeding or foraging. However, the higher
feed consumption in quails housed in cages between 3 wk and 5 wk of age
may be related to activation of higher feeding behaviour to compensate
for lost feed consumption during the early production cycle.
Additionally, birds in cages do not have enough space or enrichment to
explore or to express most of their natural behaviours and therefore may
spend most of their time feeding or engaging in feeding behaviour.
Similar to findings of the current study, different authors have also
identified higher feed intake in quails housed in either cages or litter
systems throughout the production cycle (Kayastha et al., 2012Kayastha
TB, Dutta S, Pal VN, Kayastha RB, 2012. Performance of Japanese quail
on different management system. Indian J Animal Prod Manag: 28(3-4), 218-222.
; Alindekon et al., 2019Alindekon
S, Abu OA, Babayemi JO, Agblo P, Adjovi-boco YM, 2019. Growth
performance of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) reared on
deep litter and cages in the hot humid tropics of Southern Bénin
Republic. Anim Prod: 20(3): 191-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jap.2018.20.3.674
; Gözet et al., 2019Gözet
B, Kursun K, Baylan M, Bulancak A, 2019. Effects of different breeding
systems on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Japanese
quails. YSU Congress, Prague (Czech Republic), August 6-8. pp:238-249.
; Muhammad & Mirza, 2019Muhammad
SD, Mirza RA, 2019. Effect of rearing system on performance, meat
quality and welfare in local quails. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci: 31: 116-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.21271/zjpas
).
In
the current study, better feed conversion efficiency between 3 wk and 4
wk of age was identified in quails housed in non-cage production
systems (litter system and slatted floors) than in quails housed in
cages. Birds in cages are identified with poor welfare due to stress,
which has a profound negative effect on their performance (Kursun et al., 2024bKursun
K, Abdallah N, Boga YE, Baylan M, 2024b. The influence of different
production systems on the welfare of a new commercial layer hen hybrid.
Braz J Poult Sci: 26(01): 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2023-1868
). This might account for the poorer feed conversion efficiency observed in the quails housed in cages. El-Sagheer et al. (2012)El-Sagheer
M, El-Hammady HY, Farghly MFA, 2012. Productive and reproductive
performance of Japanese quail raised in batteries and on litter floor at
two densities under the prevailing climaGolden quails conditions in
Assiut Upper Egypt. In Summit and 6th Int Poult Conf, Alexandria
(Egypt), March 26 - 29. pp: 26-29.
and EL-Sheikh et al. (2016)El-Sheikh
TM, Essa NM, Abdel-Kareem A AA, Elsagheer MA, 2016. Evaluation of
productive and reproductive performance of Japanese quails in floor pens
and conventional cages with different stocking densities. Egypt Poult
Sci J: 36(3): 669-683. https://doi.org/10.21608/epsj.2016.168800
also identified a better feed conversion ratio in quails housed in non-cage housing systems than in quails housed in cages.
The similar carcass weight between the strains in the current study confirms the findings of Chatoo & Al-Barzinji (2022)Chatoo
KB, Al-Barzinji YM, 2022. comparative study of production performance
among local quails. Iraqi J Agric Sci: 53(6): 1298-1304.
and Kursun (2022)Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
, who also reported identical carcass weight between quail strains. In addition, Kursun (2022)Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
identified a
higher dressing percentage in golden quails, which is in line with the
findings of the present study. The higher dressing percentage in golden
quails may be due to their higher carcass weight compared to brown
quails. It is possible that the brown quails had a higher percentage of
abdominal fat resulting in higher live weight but lower carcass weight.
Additionally, it could also be possible that at the slaughter age,
growth and development were still continuing in golden quails however,
brown quails may have reached their peak growth and developmental stage
earlier before the slaughter age.
The heart weight was higher in
brown quails than in golden quails in the present study and this may be
due to the rapid growth and development of this strain. Although not
significantly different, Kursun (2022)Kursun
H, 2022. Bıldırcınlarda farklı genotip ve yerleşim sıklığının besi
performansı ve karkas kalitesine etkisi. Master’s thesis. Kahramanmaraş
Sütçü İmam Uni, Kahramanmaraş, Turkiye.
also identified a higher heart weight in brown quails than in golden quails.
In line with the findings of the current study, Badawi (2017)Badawi YK, 2017. Effect of housing system on Japanese quail performance. J Anim Poult Prod: 8(12): 483-490. http://dx.doi.org/10.21608/JAPPMU.2017.46068
also reported no significant effect of the production system on the
weight of internal organs (heart, liver, and gizzard). Additionally, the
carcass weight was higher in quails housed in cages than in quails
housed in other production systems. This observation is a direct
reflection of the higher body weight identified in quails housed in
cages throughout the experimental period. Our findings contradict the
results of Gözet et al. (2019)Gözet
B, Kursun K, Baylan M, Bulancak A, 2019. Effects of different breeding
systems on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Japanese
quails. YSU Congress, Prague (Czech Republic), August 6-8. pp:238-249.
and Muhammad & Mirza (2019)Muhammad
SD, Mirza RA, 2019. Effect of rearing system on performance, meat
quality and welfare in local quails. Zanco J Pure Appl Sci: 31: 116-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.21271/zjpas
, who reported a higher carcass weight in quails housed in a litter system and free-range than in quails housed in cages.
The overall performance of quails housed in cages in terms of body weight, body weight gain, carcass weight, and feed intake were better than that of quails housed in other production systems. Growth performance was poorest in the quails housed in the slatted floors. Additionally, brown quails had superiority in terms of body weight, body weight gain, and feed conversion ratio than golden quails. It was therefore concluded that brown and golden quails could be reared in cages or litter systems without any negative effect on growth performance and carcass traits. However, because most of the research focused on cages, litter systems, or free-range systems, it is recommended that subsequent research should be conducted to investigate the effect of indoor systems with slatted floors on quail performance.
Ethical approval
⌅This study was conducted with the full consideration of animal welfare and the approval of this study was granted by the ethic committee of Çukurova University in Adana, Türkiye.
Data availability
⌅The data for this research is available with the corresponding author and will be shared upon request.
Competing interests
⌅The authors declare no competing interest.
Statement about use of generative AI
⌅The author(s) employed DeepL translator. Version 24.8.1.13198+a8473b37ea891268a8ccc6f7f04a4161fe53a7f. year 2023 in order to translate to Spanish the title, abstract and key words while preparing this work. Following their use, the author(s) assumed full responsibility for the publication's content and reviewed and edited it as necessary.
Authors’ contributions
⌅Ayse Angishan: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization. Nasir Abdallah: Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Kadriye Kursun: Writing - review & editing. Mikail Baylan: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization.
Funding
⌅| Funding agencies/institutions | Project / Grant |
|---|---|
| Çukurova University Scientific Research Projects Unit | FYL-2021-13388 |