Introduction
⌅Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is an annual, dioecious, and genetically diverse plant that belongs
to the world’s oldest domesticated crops. It has been cultivated
worldwide for many centuries for fiber, seed, essential oils, and
cannabinoids (Adesina et al., 2020Adesina
I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state
of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and
utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
)
until its prohibition after World War II. Recently, the interest in
hemp cultivation has been rising due to the demand for non-food crops,
renewable raw materials (Baldini et al., 2018Baldini
M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F,
Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
), and medicines by natural compounds (Hesami et al., 2023Hesami
M, Pepe M, Baiton A, Jones AMP, 2023. Current status and future
prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and
synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv 62: 108074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074
).
Nowadays, many European countries have reintroduced the legal
cultivation of genotypes that contain less than 0.3% of the psychoactive
substance Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in their dry inflorescences (EC, 2023European Commission. Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species. Available online: https://op.europa.eu (accessed on 25 May 2024).
).
Even though hemp is a polyvalent, and multifactional plant of great economic magnitude due to its industrial (Karche et al., 2019Karche T, Singh MR, 2019. The application of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for a green economy: A review. Turk J Bot 43: 710-723. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1907-15
), medicinal, recreational (Hesami et al., 2023Hesami
M, Pepe M, Baiton A, Jones AMP, 2023. Current status and future
prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and
synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv 62: 108074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074
), and nutritional (Kruger et al., 2022Krüger M, van Eeden T, Beswa D, 2022. Cannabis sativa cannabinoids as functional ingredients in snack foods–Historical and developmental aspects. Plants 11(23): 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233330
)
potential, there is a scientific gap around the crop cultivation. Legal
restrictions resulted in a deficiency of science-based knowledge
regarding hemp agronomical practices, such as crop inputs, and cultivar
choice (Tang et al., 2016Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
). According to the literature, special attention has been paid to the effects of plant nutrition, especially nitrogen supply (Anderson et al., 2021Anderson SL, Pearson B, Kjelgren R, Brym Z, 2021. Response of essential oil hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growth, biomass, and cannabinoid profiles to varying fertigation rates. PLoS One 16(7): e0252985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252985
; Papastylianou et al., 2021Papastylianou
P, Kousta A, Kakabouki I, Travlos I, Iliadi D, 2021. Nitrogen
utilization efficiency and yield traits of dual-purpose industrial hemp
cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 69(1):
104-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1959551
)
monopolizing the scientific interest to the detriment of other
cultivation practices. As a result, water-related studies are scarce ( Consentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Gill et al., 2022Gill
AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022.
Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
; Park et al., 2022Park
SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden
Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the
onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial
hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
) given that water deficiency is a significant constraint of hemp production (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Meanwhile, crop water use efficiency and drought tolerance are still under disputation (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
).
Drought
is considered to have the greatest effect on hemp cultivation and
agriculture compared with other relevant abiotic stresses (Gao et al., 2018Gao C, Cheng C, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tang Q, Xin, P, Liu T, Yan Z, Guo Y, Zang, G, 2018. Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int J Genomics 2018: 3057272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3057272
).
Plants initiate several physiological, biochemical, and morphological
changes that induce plant growth, development, and productivity to
tolerate drought stress (Jiang et al., 2021Jiang
Y, Sun Y, Zheng D, Han C, Cao K, Xu L, Liu S, Cao Y, Feng N, 2021.
Physiological and transcriptome analyses for assessing the effects of
exogenous uniconazole on drought tolerance in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Sci Rep 11: 14476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93820-6
).
Short-term water stress is weighted with reduced leaf transpiration
rate and stomatal conductance, while long-term drought effects lead to
decreased carbon fixation, damaged relative chlorophyll content, and net
photosynthesis (Gill et al., 2022Gill
AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022.
Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
).
In addition, the water content of plant cells is decreased causing them
to shrink and inhibit cell division. The lasting water deficit
regulates nutrient transport within the plant and promotes leaf
senescence (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Thus, the overall increase in leaf length, stem, and above-ground biomass is limited (Gao et al., 2018Gao C, Cheng C, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tang Q, Xin, P, Liu T, Yan Z, Guo Y, Zang, G, 2018. Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int J Genomics 2018: 3057272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3057272
).
Literature
indicates that long-term water deficit conditions promote the
acceleration of flowering, while fiber growth and maturation are delayed
resulting in decreased fiber yields. In addition, findings showed that
above-ground biomass and seed yield are sensitive to water stress (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Garcia-Tejero et al., 2014García-Tejero
IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Pérez-Álvarez R, Hernández A, Casano S, Morón M,
Muriel-Fernández ML, 2014. Impact of plant density and irrigation on
yield of hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment. J Agr Sci Tech 16:887-895. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9987-en.html
; Tang et al., 2016Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
). In terms of the cannabinoid content, the research on hemp response to water stress is sparse (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan
D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and
cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress.
HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; Park et al., 2022Park
SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden
Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the
onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial
hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
)
and the experimental findings are contrasting. A previous study
conducted in a controlled environment showed that the concentration of
cannabinoids of interest increased in response to water stress (Park et al., 2022Park
SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden
Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the
onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial
hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
).
On the contrary, no significant differences were presented in
cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations between well-watered and water-stressed
hemp plants in a field production setting (Garcia-Tejero et al., 2019García-Tejero
IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano
S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
).
The
above-mentioned hazardous effects caused by water deficiency could
become even more intense considering the severity and frequency of
extreme weather events, and water shortages provoked by global warming.
To overcome the continued water deficiencies and achieve a high hemp
yield, irrigation may become necessary in most regions worldwide. As a
short-day plant, hemp requires high moisture throughout its growing
season (Adesina et al., 2020Adesina
I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state
of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and
utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
).
Studies in Europe showed that the crop needs a total of 500-700 mm of
water with at least 250-350 mm during the vegetative stage (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Adesina et al., 2020Adesina
I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state
of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and
utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
; Herppich et al., 2020Herppich
WB, Gusovius HJ, Flemming I, Drastig K, 2020. Effects of drought and
heat on photosynthetic performance, water use and yield of two selected
fiber hemp cultivars at a poor-soil site in Brandenburg (Germany).
Agronomy 10(9): 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091361
; Blandinières & Amaducci, 2022Blandinières H, Amaducci S, 2022. Adapting the cultivation of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to marginal lands: A review. GCB Bioenergy 14(9):1004-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12979
).
Until
now there has been a variation in the optimum water requirements of
crop since research on the effects of environmental conditions and
genotype is incomplete. A large proportion of the variation in hemp
drought response has been attributed to hemp genotypes (Babaei & Ajdanian, 2020Babaei
M, Ajdanian L, 2020. Screening of different Iranian ecotypes of
cannabis under water deficit stress. Sci Hortic 260: 108904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108904
).
The large genetic variability derived from the development of improved
monoecious cultivars worsens the determination of optimal water supply.
According to the literature, the sexual type, and the maturity stage of
cultivars impact the humidity needs of hemp crop (Spanno et al., 2022Spano
M, Di Matteo G, Ingallina C, Sobolev AP, Giusti AM, Vinci G, Cammarone
S, Tortora C, Lamelza L, Prencipe SA, Gobbi L, Botta B, Marini F,
Campiglia E, Mannina L, 2022. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescences as novel food: The effect of different agronomical practices on chemical profile. Foods, 11(22): 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223658
). Late-maturity cultivars show higher water demands in Europe regardless of being monoecious or dioecious (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
).
Studies carried out in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions indicated
that early monoecious cultivars require at least 250 mm of irrigation
water, while late dioecious show greater needs of about 450 mm of water (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al. 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Additionally, the optimal water supply differed based on the end-use products and the derivates of cultivars (Spanno et al., 2022Spano
M, Di Matteo G, Ingallina C, Sobolev AP, Giusti AM, Vinci G, Cammarone
S, Tortora C, Lamelza L, Prencipe SA, Gobbi L, Botta B, Marini F,
Campiglia E, Mannina L, 2022. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescences as novel food: The effect of different agronomical practices on chemical profile. Foods, 11(22): 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223658
).
While the hemp market is expanding and the demand for its products is rising, there is a call for intensification of research around the best agronomical practices. For recently reintroduced crops such as hemp, there is an even more urgent need for an irrigation management design. Besides, more and more improved monoecious cultivars have been added to the EU common catalogue of agricultural plant species, whereas the effect of water deficiency on their growth and yield characteristics is unknown. To understand the relationship between water-use and drought stress of the improved cultivars, their adaptability and susceptibility evaluation is necessary.
Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of different water regimes on five monoecious dual-purpose cultivars, included in the European Catalogue and commercially available to farmers. The experiment was designed to provide data about the impact of adequate and limited water availability on the growth and development of plants, seed yield characteristics, and CBD yields of each studied cultivar. Furthermore, the response of cultivars to water regimes was determined through the water productivity under field semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.
Material and methods
⌅Experimental Site and Growth Conditions
⌅A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural University farm located in Athens (southern Greece: latitude 37°58′ N, longitude 23°32′ E, altitude 30 m above sea level), and repeated in three consecutive growing years, 2019, 2020, and 2021. The soil was clay loam (29% clay, 35.4% silt, and 35.6% sand) with pH 7.48, available phosphorus (P) 13.5 mg kg−1 soil, available potassium (K) 201 mg kg−1 soil, and 2.7% organic matter. The experimental field was positioned near an automatic meteorological station (Davis Vantage Pro2 Weather Station; Davis Instruments Corporation, California, USA), and the average air temperature and rainfall were recorded daily. The weather data were reported as mean monthly data for May to August during the studied years (Figure 1). The mean air temperature values did not show any significant variability between the growing seasons recording mean monthly values of 26.1 ℃, 25.9 ℃, and 26.9 ℃ for the growing periods 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The long-term mean annual rainfall at the site is 435.9 mm (1989-2018), but temporal variability is high. The highest total rainfall for the periods May to August was recorded at the growing season 2020 (64 mm) followed by 2021 (34.2 mm) and 2019 (4.6 mm). Intense phenomena did not occur during the three-year study.
Experimental Set Up
⌅The experimental design was a randomized complete block design replicated three times in a split-plot restriction with irrigation regimes as the main plots and hemp cultivars as the sub-plots. Five hemp cultivars widely grown in European environments, and often selected by Greek farmers, were used in the study. These cultivars were monoecious with THC content below 0.3% as required by EC regulation, and suitable for seed and/or dual-purpose cultivation, while differed in earliness and origin (Table 1). Moreover, cultivars were chosen based on their morphological, and maturity traits. Seeds of industrial hemp cultivars were obtained from iHempFarms EAD (Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria).
| Cultivar | Origin | Sexual type | Maturity group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Futura 75 | France | Monoecious | Late |
| Fedora 17 | France | Monoecious | Medium-Early |
| Ferimon | France | Monoecious | Medium |
| Santhica 27 | France | Monoecious | Medium-Early |
| Uso 31 | Ukraine | Monoecious | Early |
The irrigation regimes consisted of three different water regimes supplying 100% of the crop’s water requirement (the well-watered; IRR100), 75% (the mild water-stressed; IRR75), and 50% (severe water-stressed; IRR50). A surface drip irrigation system was used for irrigation, A 16 mm diameter polyethylene pipe with inline pressure compensating drippers at 0.33 m intervals was placed on one side of each hemp row. The average discharge of emitters was 2.3 l h-1 at the 0.1 MPa. The crop was irrigated with 80 mm for the first two weeks after sowing to achieve a successful crop establishment. The irrigation was stopped one week before harvest. The total water inputs including the precipitation amount and the irrigation water that were applied during each growing season are described in Table 2.
| Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Well Watered | Stress Level | Well Watered | Stress Level | Well Watered | Stress Level | ||||
| IRR100 | IRR75 | IRR50 | IRR100 | IRR75 | IRR50 | IRR100 | IRR75 | IRR50 | |
| Irrigation water (mm) | 488 | 386 | 284 | 488 | 386 | 284 | 488 | 386 | 284 |
| Precipitation (mm) | 4.6 | 64 | 34.2 | ||||||
| Total (mm) | 492.6 | 390.6 | 288.6 | 552 | 450 | 348 | 522.2 | 420.2 | 318.2 |
The plot size of each irrigation treatment was 5 m x 12 m and the spacing between each main plot was 4 m to minimize water movement among treatments. The experimental plots were 5 m x 2.4 m and consisted of 8 rows 0.30 m apart. The experimental area was plowed at a depth of 25 cm followed by secondary tillage with a disc harrow to prepare the crop seedbed. An organic fertilizer 7-4-7 (Biogen, Phytothreptiki S.A., Athens, Greece) at a rate of 140 kg N, 80 kg P2O5, and 140 kg K2O ha-1 was broadcast applied two days before seeding and incorporated into the soil using a cultivator. Hemp seeds were sown by hand at a depth of 3 cm on 9 May 2019, 14 May 2020, and 13 May 2021 to achieve the planned crop density of 120-125 plants m-2. No pesticides were utilized during the crop establishment and growth, while the emerged weed species were hand-removed when necessary. Agronomic practices were the same during all three growing seasons.
Determination of Agronomical Traits, and Seed Yield Components
⌅To evaluate the effect of irrigation regimes (IRR) on hemp agronomical traits, plant height, and dry above-ground biomass were documented from five randomly selected plants of the inner plant row of each plot at 61 days after sowing (DAS). Plant height was measured from the base of the plant to the growing tip. For the above-ground biomass determination, plants were cut to ground level with manual shears, and the sampled plant material was oven-dried at 80 ℃ for 72 hours until their weight remained constant and reweighted.
To measure hemp Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a Trimble® GreenSeeker® handheld sensor (Trimble Agriculture Division, Westminster, CO, USA)
was used at 61 DAS in 2020 and 2021. The sensor unit has self-contained
illumination in both near-infrared (NIR) (visible 770 nm) and red
(visible 660 nm) ranges (Tremblay et al., 2009Tremblay
N, Wang Z, Ma BL, Belec C, Vigneault P, 2009. A comparison of crop data
measured by two commercial sensors for variable-rate nitrogen
application. Precision Agric 10: 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9080-2
) corresponding to the subsequent Equation (1):
Regarding
the procedure of NDVI records, the sensor was placed parallel to the
direction of the crop rows and held stable at a height of 25-30 cm above
the leaf area on bright days at midday. The device was slowly moved
within the limits of the quadrat for 5 s as recommended by Kong et al. (2019)Kong
B, Yu H, Du R, Wang Q, 2019. Quantitative estimation of biomass of
alpine grasslands using hyperspectral remote sensing. Rangeland Ecol
Manag 72(2): 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.10.005
. This procedure was repeated thrice per sub-subplot, then recorded values were averaged.
At the end of seed maturity (BBCH:2307), all plants in an area of 6 m2 from the middle rows were hand-harvested above soil level, and their seeds were air-dried, threshed, cleaned, and weighed for seed yield determination, after removing the empty seeds. Among the harvested plants, samples from 10 plants were taken randomly, separated into stems, leaves, inflorescences, and seeds, weighed, and the length of main and secondary inflorescences and seed numbers were determined. The seed density index (SDI, cm−1) was calculated as the quotient between seed number per plant and mean inflorescence length. Hemp plants were harvested at 112, 108, and 109 DAS in the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons respectively.
To characterize the effective
water use of hemp cultivars, the Water Productivity index (WP) was
selected to define the relationship between crop produced and the amount
of water involved in crop production. WP was calculated as the ratio of
biomass yield and the sum of all components of water inflow via air and
ground that are used for crop growth and the total water amount during
the total crop growth period (Prochnow et al., 2012Prochnow
A, Drastig K, Klauss H, Berg W, 2012. Water use indicators at farm
scale: methodology and case study. Food Energy Secur 1: 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.6
).
Cannabinoids Analysis
⌅At the female flowering stage (BBCH: 2301-2302), which was determined when 50% of bracts formed, inflorescence samples were harvested from the top of uniform plants in each subplot. All plant material was air-dried at 25 ℃, powdered with a commercial mill, and sifted using a sieve shaker (BA 200 N, CISA, Spain). The sample fractions with a particle size of less than 1 mm were stored at -20℃ until analysis.
The CBD
concentrations of samples were determined by the technique of Ultra
Performance Liquid Chromatography with Photodiode Array Detection (UPLC –
PDA) according to the methodology described by Tzimas et al. (2021)Tzimas
PS, Petrakis EA, Halabalaki M, Skaltsounis LA, 2021. Effective
determination of the principal non-psychoactive cannabinoids in
fiber-type Cannabis sativa L. by UPLC-PDA following a comprehensive design and optimization of extraction methodology. Anal Chim Acta 1150: 338200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338200
and expressed as cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), and
total cannabidiol (CBD total). The CBDA concentration was determined as
the acidic form which when exposed to environmental factors, such as
light and heat is decarboxylated and converted into CBD. In each
inflorescence sample, total CBD concentration (%) was calculated as a
sum of CBD (%) and CBDA (%) multiplicated by 0.877 which accounts for
the differences in molar mass between the acid and neutral forms of the
cannabinoid.
Statistical Analysis
⌅All data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the software STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII Version statistical software (Statpoint Technologies Inc., The Plains, VA, USA). Differences between treatments and their interactions were compared by using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, where probabilities are equal to or less than 0.05 (a≤5%).
Results
⌅Agronomic Growth Traits of Hemp
⌅Based on the combined analysis of variance, significant effects of irrigation regimes (IRR), and cultivar (C) were observed on the hemp growth traits in all growing seasons (p<0.001). Irrigation regimes significantly impacted hemp height and above-ground biomass recording the highest values in well-watered plants (IRR100) of all the cultivars. Both treatments of water stress mild (IRR75) and severe (IRR50) resulted in plants of reduced growth regardless of cultivars. The water deficit (IRR50) was the most limiting factor decreasing the plant height by 38.7%, 15.8%, and 18.7%, and the above-ground biomass by 71.9%, 74.6%, and 27.7% during 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively compared to fully irrigated plants. Among the cultivars, the most compact plants with the shortest stems and minimum biomass were obtained from the early flowering Cannabis sativa ʻUso 31ʼ regardless of irrigation. The tallest plants were recorded in Cannabis sativa ‘Santhica 27’, while the highest values of dry biomass were observed in the late French cultivar Cannabis sativa ‘Futura 75’. Moreover, the factor of year impacted significantly on both plant height (p<0.001), and above-ground biomass (p<0.01). Within the growing seasons, the tallest plants including the highest biomass were performed in the second experimental year regardless of irrigation and cultivar treatments. All three factors showed no interaction for the studied plant growth traits (p>0.05, ns) (Table 3).
| Height (m) | Above-ground biomass (g m-2) | NDVI | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Irrigation | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 |
| Futura 75 | IRR100 | 2.16 | 1.97 | 2.20 | 1543 | 2006 | 1419 | 0.807 | 0.856 | |
| IRR75 | 1.25 | 1.90 | 2.04 | 866.4 | 1118 | 1129 | 0.765 | 0.842 | ||
| IRR50 | 1.13 | 1.72 | 1.77 | 398.4 | 509.9 | 982.7 | 0.785 | 0.854 | ||
| Mean | 1.52 | 1.86 | 2.01 | 935.9 | 1211 | 1177 | 0.786 | 0.851 | ||
| Santhica 27 | IRR100 | 2.23 | 2.24 | 2.27 | 962.4 | 1232 | 640.6 | 0.802 | 0.846 | |
| IRR75 | 1.59 | 1.94 | 2.14 | 578.6 | 740.2 | 628.8 | 0.760 | 0.854 | ||
| IRR50 | 1.48 | 1.83 | 1.85 | 268 | 338 | 578.7 | 0.763 | 0.840 | ||
| Mean | 1.77 | 2.00 | 2.08 | 603.0 | 769.9 | 616.0 | 0.775 | 0.847 | ||
| Fedora 17 | IRR100 | 1.65 | 1.86 | 1.85 | 1140 | 1780 | 987.5 | 0.807 | 0.812 | |
| IRR75 | 1.21 | 1.68 | 1.70 | 722.0 | 757 | 649.9 | 0.777 | 0.804 | ||
| IRR50 | 1.06 | 1.55 | 1.50 | 371.2 | 343.9 | 622.0 | 0.763 | 0.834 | ||
| Mean | 1.30 | 1.70 | 1.68 | 744.3 | 960.4 | 753.1 | 0.782 | 0.817 | ||
| Ferimon | IRR100 | 1.50 | 1.80 | 1.81 | 980.2 | 932 | 758.0 | 0.822 | 0.850 | |
| IRR75 | 1.12 | 1.53 | 1.67 | 530.0 | 352.2 | 628.3 | 0.773 | 0.838 | ||
| IRR50 | 0.95 | 1.52 | 1.46 | 251.0 | 211.6 | 578.7 | 0.772 | 0.834 | ||
| Mean | 1.19 | 1.62 | 1.65 | 587.1 | 498.6 | 655 | 0.789 | 0.841 | ||
| Uso 31 | IRR100 | 1.45 | 1.70 | 1.55 | 825.2 | 1056 | 267.8 | 0.783 | 0.823 | |
| IRR75 | 1.04 | 1.50 | 1.44 | 484 | 615.0 | 232.1 | 0.778 | 0.822 | ||
| IRR50 | 0.89 | 1.44 | 1.29 | 243.6 | 307.0 | 182.0 | 0.747 | 0.794 | ||
| Mean | 1.13 | 1.55 | 1.42 | 517.6 | 659.3 | 227.3 | 0.769 | 0.813 | ||
| LSDYxIRR (0.05) | 0.094 | 150.1 | 0.018 | |||||||
| LSDYxC (0.05) | 0.122 | 193.8 | 0.023 | |||||||
| LSDIRRxC (0.05) | 0.122 | 193.8 | 0.014 | |||||||
| Analysis of variance | Y | *** | ** | *** | ||||||
| IRR | *** | *** | ** | |||||||
| C | *** | *** | ** | |||||||
| Y x IRR | *** | *** | * | |||||||
| Y x C | * | ** | * | |||||||
| IRR x C | * | ** | ns | |||||||
| Y x IRR x C | ns | ns | ns | |||||||
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05)
In addition, the effect of water deficit on hemp growth was well depicted in the vegetation index since a significant effect of irrigation regimes was recorded on NDVI (p<0.01). Index values were boosted by the maximum irrigation rate (IRR100) in all cultivars. The highest mean value of NDVI (0.82) was recorded in fully irrigated plants, while treatments of mild (IRR75) and severe (IRR50) water stress reduced mean values by 2.4%, and 2.7%, respectively compared to well-watered plants. Moreover, the effect of the cultivar was of high significance for NDVI during the three growing seasons. The greatest values of NDVI were recorded from the ‘Futura 75’ with a mean value of 0.82, while the mean values of other cultivars ranged between 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. Among the growing seasons, the highest values of NDVI were recorded in the third growing year 2021 (Y3). Even if all cultivars were positively affected by the full irrigation, the two factors showed no interaction for NDVI (p>0.05, ns) as well as the three factors (Table 3).
Seed Yield, and Yield Contributing Characteristics
⌅Regarding the yield parameters of hemp, irrigation demonstrated a significant effect on inflorescence length, seed weight per inflorescence, and seed yield in all three experimental years. Both water stress treatments reduced the studied yield characteristics without differing significantly in all cultivars. Among them, the severe water deficit (IRR50) was the most damaging treatment decreasing the mean values of inflorescence length, seed weight per inflorescence, and seed yield by 19%, 27.6%, and 29.9% respectively, compared to fully irrigated plants. Even though irrigation regimes did not differ significantly for the seed density index (p>0.05, ns), water stress treatments IRR75 and IRR50 decreased mean values recording 6.07 cm-1 and 6.17 cm-1 respectively compared to 6.97 cm-1 of well-watered plants (Table 4).
| Inflorescence length (cm) | Seed number/Inflorescence | Seed Yield (t ha-1) | Seed density index (cm-1) | Water Productivity (kg m-3) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Irrigation | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y1 | Y2 | Y3 |
| Futura 75 | IRR100 | 26.0 | 23.8 | 25.9 | 193.7 | 197 | 180.5 | 2.06 | 2.41 | 1.95 | 7.43 | 8.34 | 7.11 | 3.13 | 3.63 | 2.72 |
| IRR75 | 24.2 | 23 | 23.3 | 169.2 | 185.7 | 160.3 | 2.00 | 2.28 | 1.50 | 6.93 | 8.00 | 6.93 | 2.22 | 2.48 | 2.69 | |
| IRR50 | 22.6 | 21.3 | 21.5 | 156.7 | 167.0 | 149.2 | 1.70 | 1.46 | 1.42 | 7.82 | 7.96 | 6.86 | 1.38 | 1.47 | 2.66 | |
| Mean | 24.3 | 22.7 | 23.5 | 173.2 | 183.2 | 163.3 | 1.92 | 2.05 | 1.62 | 7.39 | 8.10 | 6.97 | 2.24 | 2.53 | 2.69 | |
| Santhica 27 | IRR100 | 35.5 | 33.8 | 34.6 | 113.8 | 177.3 | 122.0 | 1.43 | 1.57 | 1.92 | 3.18 | 5.22 | 3.53 | 1.95 | 2.23 | 1.23 |
| IRR75 | 27.9 | 26.0 | 29.7 | 106.3 | 170.8 | 113.0 | 1.26 | 1.49 | 1.36 | 3.85 | 6.66 | 3.82 | 1.48 | 1.64 | 1.50 | |
| IRR50 | 25.6 | 24.0 | 25.8 | 102.1 | 162.5 | 100.2 | 1.10 | 1.40 | 1.28 | 4.18 | 6.74 | 3.87 | 0.93 | 0.97 | 1.57 | |
| Mean | 29.6 | 27.9 | 30.0 | 107.4 | 170.2 | 111.7 | 1.26 | 1.49 | 1.52 | 3.74 | 6.21 | 3.74 | 1.45 | 1.62 | 1.43 | |
| Fedora 17 | IRR100 | 39.8 | 37.0 | 39.7 | 344.8 | 292.2 | 308.5 | 3.23 | 3.27 | 2.99 | 8.96 | 7.98 | 7.87 | 2.31 | 3.23 | 1.89 |
| IRR75 | 35.8 | 34.8 | 35.3 | 191.7 | 231.0 | 187.3 | 2.87 | 2.90 | 2.68 | 5.45 | 6.70 | 5.29 | 1.85 | 1.69 | 1.45 | |
| IRR50 | 34.8 | 33.5 | 33.8 | 182.1 | 216.7 | 172.2 | 2.02 | 2.57 | 2.65 | 5.40 | 6.33 | 5.12 | 1.29 | 0.99 | 1.68 | |
| Mean | 36.8 | 35.1 | 36.3 | 239.6 | 246.6 | 222.7 | 2.71 | 2.91 | 2.77 | 6.60 | 7.00 | 6.09 | 1.82 | 1.97 | 1.71 | |
| Ferimon | IRR100 | 32.1 | 30.5 | 32.5 | 222.9 | 229.0 | 228.2 | 2.40 | 2.84 | 2.11 | 7.43 | 7.23 | 6.97 | 1.99 | 1.69 | 1.45 |
| IRR75 | 30.8 | 28.0 | 29.9 | 188.2 | 198.2 | 170.5 | 2.32 | 2.56 | 1.60 | 6.26 | 6.97 | 5.78 | 1.36 | 0.78 | 1.50 | |
| IRR50 | 26.1 | 25.0 | 25.7 | 175.7 | 184.2 | 155.3 | 1.52 | 1.09 | 1.50 | 6.81 | 7.56 | 6.17 | 0.87 | 0.61 | 1.57 | |
| Mean | 29.6 | 27.8 | 29.4 | 195.6 | 203.8 | 184.7 | 2.08 | 2.16 | 1.74 | 6.83 | 7.25 | 6.31 | 1.68 | 1.91 | 0.51 | |
| Uso 31 | IRR100 | 37.7 | 35.8 | 36.8 | 259.3 | 262.7 | 263 | 2.31 | 2.28 | 2.22 | 6.93 | 7.28 | 7.14 | 1.24 | 1.37 | 0.55 |
| IRR75 | 33.4 | 30.7 | 32.2 | 187.2 | 228.3 | 173.5 | 1.81 | 1.96 | 1.69 | 5.49 | 7.48 | 5.43 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.49 | |
| IRR50 | 31.8 | 28.7 | 30.8 | 179.1 | 187.8 | 168.5 | 1.65 | 1.60 | 1.57 | 5.74 | 6.52 | 5.49 | 1.25 | 1.39 | 0.52 | |
| Mean | 34.3 | 31.7 | 33.3 | 208.5 | 226.3 | 201.7 | 1.92 | 1.95 | 1.83 | 6.05 | 7.09 | 6.02 | 1.55 | 1.65 | 0.62 | |
| LSDYxIRR (0.05) | 3.26 | 42.4 | 0.64 | 1.62 | 0.341 | |||||||||||
| LSDYxC (0.05) | 4.21 | 54.7 | 0.83 | 2.09 | 0.440 | |||||||||||
| LSDIRRxC (0.05) | 4.21 | 54.7 | 0.83 | 2.09 | 0.440 | |||||||||||
| Analysis of variance | Y | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | ||||||||||
| IRR | *** | *** | ** | ns | *** | |||||||||||
| C | *** | *** | *** | *** | *** | |||||||||||
| Y x IRR | ns | ns | ns | ns | *** | |||||||||||
| Y x C | ns | * | ns | * | ** | |||||||||||
| IRR x C | * | * | * | * | * | |||||||||||
| Y x IRR x C | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |||||||||||
The combined analysis of variance also demonstrated the highly significance effect of cultivar on all yield parameters of hemp (p<0.001). The longest inflorescences with numerous seeds were performed in the medium-maturity cultivar ‘Fedora 17’ with mean values ranging between 35.1 cm and 36.8 cm, and between 223 and 247 seeds per inflorescence respectively during the three growing seasons. Among the cultivars, the highest mean seed yield was performed from the ‘Fedora 17’ (2.80 t ha-1) and was twice the mean yield of the less productive ‘Santhica 27’ (1.42 t ha-1) regardless of irrigation and year. The lower seed density index was poorly performed on average from the ‘Santhica 27’ recording 4.56 cm-1, while the highest values of 7.49 cm-1 were presented in the cultivar ‘Futura 75’. Between the growing seasons, plants with the most seeds, performing the highest seed yield, and the greatest seed density index were produced in the second experimental year regardless of irrigation and cultivar treatments. All three factors showed no interaction for the studied hemp yield components (p>0.05) (Table 4).
Results revealed that water productivity was affected by the irrigation and cultivar (p<0.001). Increasing irrigation water to full significantly increased water productivity compared to water-stressed plants, whereas drought stress showed just the opposite effects in most of the studied cases. Among the cultivars, ‘Futura 75’ recorded the highest mean value of 2.49 kg m-3 followed by ‘Fedora 17’ with 1.82 kg m-3. The lowest mean value was 0.95 kg m-3 and was observed in ‘Uso 31’ plants. Moreover, no significant difference was noticed among years for water productivity, whereas the interactions of year with irrigation, year with cultivar, and irrigation with cultivar showed a large interaction. All three factors showed no interaction in the case of water productivity (p>0.05, ns) (Table 4).
Cannabidiol Yield Characteristics
⌅Water regimes noticed a significant impact on cannabidiol yield in both the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons (p<0.001). In 2019, the highest CBD concentration was recorded in the inflorescences of fully irrigated plants without differing meaningfully from the water-stressed plants of IRR50. As for CBDA, the severe water stress increased the concentration by 27% compared to well-watered plants regardless of cultivar. Thus, the total CBD concentration was observed in the fully irrigated plants recording 1.25 % w/w followed by the 1.03% w/w of severe water-stressed plants (IRR50) without varying consistently. In the next growing season, the effect of different water regimes on cannabidiol yield was evident, and severe water stress seemed the most enhancing treatment compared to full irrigation and mild water stress. By increasing drought stress to IRR50, the CBD and CBD total concentrations were almost duplicated, and CBDA concentration increased thrice (Table 5).
| CBD (%w/w) | CBDA (%w/w) | CBD total (%w/w) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Irrigation | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 | Y1 | Y2 |
| Futura 75 | IRR100 | 1.48 | 0.73 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 1.77 | 0.95 |
| IRR75 | 0.55 | 0.64 | 0.057 | 0.35 | 0.60 | 0.95 | |
| IRR50 | 1.39 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.71 | 1.82 | 1.59 | |
| Mean | 1.14 | 0.78 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 1.40 | 1.16 | |
| Santhica 27 | IRR100 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.017 | 0.031 | 0.55 | 0.41 |
| IRR75 | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.004 | 0.003 | 0.35 | 0.44 | |
| IRR50 | 0.37 | 0.93 | 0.078 | 0.004 | 0.44 | 0.93 | |
| Mean | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.033 | 0.013 | 0.45 | 0.59 | |
| Fedora 17 | IRR100 | 0.82 | 0.49 | 0.062 | 0.15 | 0.88 | 0.62 |
| IRR75 | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.101 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.92 | |
| IRR50 | 0.69 | 0.86 | 0.140 | 0.42 | 0.82 | 1.22 | |
| Mean | 0.76 | 0.67 | 0.101 | 0.29 | 0.85 | 0.92 | |
| Ferimon | IRR100 | 1.86 | 0.62 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 2.14 | 0.77 |
| IRR75 | 1.60 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.86 | 1.21 | |
| IRR50 | 1.34 | 1.21 | 0.28 | 0.50 | 1.59 | 1.66 | |
| Mean | 1.60 | 0.92 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 1.86 | 1.21 | |
| Uso 31 | IRR100 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.069 | 0.90 | 0.09 |
| IRR75 | 0.58 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.091 | 0.70 | 0.21 | |
| IRR50 | 0.39 | 0.22 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.50 | 0.32 | |
| Mean | 0.58 | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.70 | 0.21 | |
| LSDYxIRR | 0.119 | 0.055 | 0.143 | ||||
| LSDYxC | 0.154 | 0.071 | 0.184 | ||||
| LSDIRRxC | 0.188 | 0.087 | 0.226 | ||||
| Analysis of variance | Y | *** | ** | *** | |||
| IRR | *** | *** | *** | ||||
| C | *** | *** | *** | ||||
| Y x IRR | *** | *** | *** | ||||
| Y x C | *** | *** | *** | ||||
| IRR x C | *** | *** | *** | ||||
| Y x IRR x C | ** | ** | ** | ||||
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05)
Furthermore, the analysis of variance revealed the significant effect of cultivar on CBD concentration (p<0.001). ‘Ferimon’ inflorescences produced the highest CBD concentration recording 1.59% w/w and 0.92% w/w in 2019 and 2020, respectively. As for CBDA and CBD total, ‘Ferimon’ showed the greatest concentrations marginally higher than ‘Futura 75’. Among the cultivars, the early maturity ‘Uso 31’ produced inflorescences with the lowest CBD Total concentration. For all the cannabidiol yield components, the year effect was significant, and the highest values were recorded in the second experimental year. All three factors also showed a large interaction for cannabidiol yield components (p<0.01) (Table 5).
Discussion
⌅Hemp has been characterized as a high-yield crop, requiring low inputs, whereas experimental data prove its high-water demands (Blandinieres & Amaducci, 2022Blandinières H, Amaducci S, 2022. Adapting the cultivation of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to marginal lands: A review. GCB Bioenergy 14(9):1004-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12979
).
Especially in dry environments, such as the Mediterranean, the required
water demands for cultivation are not enclosed by precipitation, and
irrigation is considered necessary (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
).
The available literature on crop irrigation is scarce, especially given
that newly developed cultivars have been added to the EU Common List of
Cultivated Plant Species. Since the hemp market and economic interest
are rising, there is a need to intensify the research on crop irrigation
management.
Agronomic Traits of Hemp
⌅By
reducing the water supplied the crop decreased significantly the
performed plant height and biomass. Among the irrigation regimes, the
severe water stress treatment (IRR50) was the most damaging
factor in hemp growth reducing the plant height and biomass up to 24.1%
and 62.6%, respectively, regardless of cultivars and years. These
findings could be attributed to the long-term effects of water stress
that negatively affects plant morphology (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
) through the decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and passage of CO2 in plants. Previous research confirmed the reduction of hemp height due
to water deficit, as obtained from field studies in Spain (García-Tejero et al., 2014García-Tejero
IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Pérez-Álvarez R, Hernández A, Casano S, Morón M,
Muriel-Fernández ML, 2014. Impact of plant density and irrigation on
yield of hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment. J Agr Sci Tech 16:887-895. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9987-en.html
), USA (Campbell et al., 2019Campbell
BJ, Berrada AF, Hudalla C, Amaducci S, McKay JK, 2019. Genotype ×
environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse
responses to environmental factors. Agrosystems Geosci Environ 2(1):
1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057
), and Greece (Scordia et al., 2022Scordia
D, Papazoglou EG, Kotoula D, Sanz M, Ciria CS, Pérez J, Maliarenko O,
Prysiazhniuk O, von Cossel M, Greiner BE, Lazdina D, Makovskis K, Lamy
I, Ciadamidaro L, Grezeriat LP, Corinzia SA, 2022. Towards identifying
industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass
production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14(7): 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12935
). Similar negative effects on hemp biomass were recorded in the literature (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
; Herppich et al., 2020Herppich
WB, Gusovius HJ, Flemming I, Drastig K, 2020. Effects of drought and
heat on photosynthetic performance, water use and yield of two selected
fiber hemp cultivars at a poor-soil site in Brandenburg (Germany).
Agronomy 10(9): 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091361
; Gill et al., 2022Gill
AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022.
Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
).
Regarding
the growth traits, five cultivars showed significant differences
between them (p<0.001) since their growth was determined by genotype
and environment. The important effect of variety on hemp growth has been
confirmed by many authors (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Baldini et al., 2018Baldini
M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F,
Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
).
Field experiments demonstrated the superiority in biomass growth of the
cultivars ‘Futura 75’, ‘Santhica 27’, and ‘Fedora 17’ compared to ‘Uso
31’ (Flajšman & Kocjan Ačko, 2020Flajšman
M, Kocjan Ačko D, 2020. Influence of edaphoclimatic conditions on stem
production and stem morphological characteristics of 10 European hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) varieties. Acta Agric Slov 115(2): 399-407. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1528
).
As for the impact of the environment on hemp cultivars, it has been
mentioned that a more extended photoperiod with longer days, increases
plant height and biomass since it delays flowering, and increases the
duration of the vegetative stage. In countries geographically close to
Greece, long-duration days favor the production of fiber and biomass.
That fact justified the superiority of late flowering ‘Futura 75’ over
‘Fedora 17’ and ‘Ferimon’ cultivars in dry biomass (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
). Similar results were recorded in Italy according to which ‘Futura 75’ scored higher stem biomass than ‘Fedora 17’, ‘Uso 31’ (Baldini et al., 2018Baldini
M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F,
Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
), and ‘Ferimon’ (Ferfuia et al., 2021Ferfuia
C, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Piani B, Cattivello C, Dorigo G, Baldini M,
2021. Performance and stability of different monoecious hemp cultivars
in a multi-environments trial in North-Eastern Italy. Agronomy 11(7):
1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071424
).
Irrigation
contributed positively to hemp height and biomass of all cultivars.
Comparable results were obtained in field studies (Campbell et al., 2019Campbell
BJ, Berrada AF, Hudalla C, Amaducci S, McKay JK, 2019. Genotype ×
environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse
responses to environmental factors. Agrosystems Geosci Environ 2(1):
1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057
; Scordia et al., 2022Scordia
D, Papazoglou EG, Kotoula D, Sanz M, Ciria CS, Pérez J, Maliarenko O,
Prysiazhniuk O, von Cossel M, Greiner BE, Lazdina D, Makovskis K, Lamy
I, Ciadamidaro L, Grezeriat LP, Corinzia SA, 2022. Towards identifying
industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass
production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14(7): 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12935
). In addition, ‘Futura 75’ and ‘Santhica 27’ were more resistant to severe water stress (IRR50). The negative effects of deficit irrigation on leaf and stem dry weight of the ‘Futura 75’ have been reported by Cosentino et al. (2013)Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
. The sensitivity of ‘Ferimon’ to water stress conditions has also been shown by Kumar (2021)Kumar IMKV, 2021. Production and quality of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.
. However, the present literature about the resistance and susceptibility of hemp cultivars to water stress is in its infancy.
Concerning
NDVI, the results showed that deficit irrigation regimes were
restrictive on the leaves' photosynthetic surface and normal plant
growth. Severe drought (IRR50) reduced the NDVI values by
2.7% compared with full irrigation. The lowest values caused by
inadequate water availability are also in line with the formation of
reduced plant biomass. In addition, decreased values are justified by
the fact that water-stressed plants can lead to rapid aging of the
leaves, limited photosynthetic rate, and effectiveness (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
).
The cultivar effect was of high significance for NDVI during the three
growing seasons. The greatest values were recorded by ‘Futura 75’, a
result that agrees with the greatest biomass that was performed. In
contrast, the ‘Uso 31’ formed plants with the lowest biomass, leaf
surface, and soil cover, and thus the lowest values of NDVI. Similar
results for the NDVI of ‘Futura 75’ and ‘Ferimon’ cultivars have been
reported by Wulff (2022)Wulff HM, 2022. Growth and development of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Master’s thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand. 146 pp.
.
Seed Yield, and Yield Contributing Characteristics
⌅Since
a significant part of global hemp production is intended for seed, the
effect of irrigation on the number of seeds per inflorescence, and seed
yield was evaluated. The results demonstrated the negative effects of
deficit irrigation on both studied characteristics for all experimental
years. Plants subjected to the IRR75 and IRR50 treatments caused the formation of inflorescences with fewer and lighter
seeds compared to fully irrigated plants. The reduction in seed yield
can be attributed primarily to the reduced number of seeds per plant
rather than reduced individual seed weight. These results probably
indicate that, under conditions of intense water stress, hemp
prioritizes the production of filled seeds over the number of them. This
is a possible hedging strategy to ensure the successful reproduction of
the plant under stress conditions, as also reported by Gill et al. (2022)Gill
AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022.
Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
. Comparable results have been reported in the existing literature (Kumar et al., 2021Kumar IMKV, 2021. Production and quality of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.
; Gill et al., 2022Gill
AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022.
Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
).
In addition, the inflorescence length was measured, and the seed
density index was calculated to identify differences among cultivars of
contrasting yield potential. Both traits have been proposed promising in
breeding programs for other crops such as wheat (Ferrante et al., 2020Ferrante
A, Savin R, Slafer GA, 2020. Floret development and spike fertility in
wheat: Differences between cultivars of contrasting yield potential and
their sensitivity to photoperiod and soil N. Field Crops Res 256:
107908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107908
).
The results revealed that water stress treatments reduced the SDI, but
the differences were insignificant among irrigation regimes.
Significant
differences were noted between cultivars for inflorescence length, seed
number per inflorescence, seed yield, and SDI (p<0.001). The longest
inflorescences with the most seeds, the highest seed yield the greatest
SDI values were performed in the medium-maturity cultivar ‘Fedora 17’.
The least productive cultivar in terms of the seed studied traits
appeared to be the ‘Santhica 27’. Similar results have been reported for
‘Futura 75’, ‘Santhica 27’, and ‘Fedora 17’ by Tsaliki et al. (2021)Tsaliki
E, Kalivas A, Jankauskiene Z, Irakli M, Cook C, Grigoriadis I, Panoras
I, Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, 2021. Fibre and seed productivity of
industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy 11(1): 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010171
. This superiority of ‘Fedora 17’ over the other cultivars has also been reported by Tang et al. (2016)Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
, and Baldini et al. (2018)Baldini
M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F,
Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
.
Water Productivity
⌅Hemp
water productivity is a quantitative index used to determine the
relationship between crop production and the total amount of water
needed in crop production. It was selected to quantify the effect of
irrigation and schedule the appropriate decisions regarding water
management. In this study, water productivity was affected by both
irrigation and cultivar. Plants of all cultivars reduced their water
productivity as the amount of irrigated water decreased, while the
maximum values were recorded when they were fully irrigated. This
finding demonstrated that additional irrigation water was required in
the water-stressed plants of all cultivars. Moreover, all five studied
cultivars showed sensitivity to water deficit reducing their yield and
water productivity. Among the cultivars, ‘Futura 75’ recorded the
highest water productivity under full irrigation and water stress
conditions. The shortest values were shown by ‘Uso 31’, especially under
severe water stress conditions (IRR50). The values of the present study varied between 0.49 and 3.63 kg m-3 as in the study of Drastig et al. (2020)Drastig
K, Flemming I, Gusovius HJ, Herppich WB, 2020. Study of water
productivity of industrial hemp under hot and dry conditions in
Brandenburg (Germany) in the year 2018. Water 12(11): 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112982
.
Cannabidiol Yield Characteristics
⌅The
results showed that irrigation significantly affected the concentration
of inflorescences in CBD, CBDA, and CBD Total in the two growing
seasons (p<0.05). During the first growing season, no significant
differences were shown in CBD, CBDA, and CBD total concentrations
between adequately and poorly irrigated hemp cultivars. Similar results
were recorded by Garcia-Tejero et al. (2019)García-Tejero
IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano
S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
in a field experiment and Duong et al. (2023)Duong H, Pearson B, Anderson S, Berthold E, Kjelgren R, 2023. Variation in hydric response of two industrial hemp varieties (Cannabis Sativa) to induced water stress. Horticulturae 9(4): 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040431
in greenhouse conditions. During 2020, both deficit irrigation regimes
led to higher concentrated inflorescences in CBD, CBDA, and CBD total
compared to fully irrigated plants. It was observed that the maximum
water stress level (IRR50) was the most favorable to produce
higher concentrations of the specific cannabinoids. Similar results have
been reported in the existing literature (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan
D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and
cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress.
HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; García-Tejero et al., 2019García-Tejero
IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano
S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
; Morgan et al., 2024Morgan W, Singh J, Kesheimer K, Davis J, Sanz-Saez A, (2024). Severe drought significantly reduces floral hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) yield and cannabinoid content but moderate drought does not. Environ Exp Bot 219: 105649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105649
), while some researchers recommend controlled drought as a means of increasing cannabinoid yield (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan
D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and
cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress.
HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; Park et al., 2022Park
SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden
Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the
onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial
hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
).
Concerning
the CBD yield, the results of both growing seasons (2019, 2020) showed
that the cultivars differed (p<0.001). Among the cultivars, ‘Futura
75’ and ‘Ferimon’ showed the highest content of the studied
cannabinoids, while the lowest was recorded in ‘Santhica 27’ and ‘Uso
31’. Similar results were noted by Glivar et al. (2020)Glivar T, Eržen J, Kreft S, Zagožen M, Čerenak A, Čeh B, Tavčar Benković E, 2020. Cannabinoid content in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties grown in Slovenia. Ind Crop Prod 145: 112082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112082
,
where the cultivars Ferimon and ‘Fedora 17’ excelled in total
cannabidiol content over ‘Santhica 27’ and ‘Uso 31’. Our results on the
CBD, CBDA, and CBD Total content of the five varieties are verified by Sikora et al. (2011)Sikora V, Berenji J, Latković D, 2011. Influence of agroclimatic conditions on content of main cannabinoids in industrial hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.). Genetika 43(3): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1103449S
, and Burgel et al. (2020)Burgel
L, Hartung J, Pflugfelder A, Graeff-Hönninger S, 2020. Impact of growth
stage and biomass fractions on cannabinoid content and yield of
different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes. Agronomy 10(3): 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030372
.
Among the growing seasons, the greatest hemp growth was noticed in the second experimental year based on the plant height, and above-ground biomass values. Furthermore, the longest inflorescences with the most seeds, the greatest seed yield, and the highest SDI and WP values were also recorded in 2020. Concerning the studied CBD yield components, the second growing year was the most productive performing inflorescences with the maximum concentrations. These findings could be attributed to climatic conditions during the critical crop establishment, and the first growth months of 2020 compared with the 2019 and 2021 growing seasons. More specifically, the highest levels of precipitation and the shortest mean air temperature were recorded from May to June 2020.
In conclusion, water stress negatively affected the hemp growth and seed yield of all studied cultivars. Among irrigation deficit treatments, severe water stress (IRR50) was the most limiting factor for biomass and seed yield, whereas enhanced the cannabidiol yield of inflorescences. The French cultivar of medium maturity ‘Ferimon’ was boosted the most by the severe drought recording the highest CBD Total (%w/w) concentrations. Under full irrigation conditions, all cultivars documented their greatest plant growth, seed yield, and water productivity. Results revealed that ‘Futura 75’ followed by ‘Fedora 17’ were the most suitable for biomass production as they had the highest biomass yield. Both ‘Fedora 17’ and ‘Ferimon’ showed high yields for seed production. Among the tested cultivars, ‘Fedora 17’ combined high biomass and seed yield, noted great water productivity and thus is considered suitable for dual-purpose production. Further investigation is needed to build up a database about the impact of adequate and limited water availability on the growth and productivity of hemp plants.
Competing interests
⌅The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Authors’ contributions
⌅Angeliki Kousta: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Panayiota Papastylianou: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Petros Tzimas: Data curation, Investigation, Validation. Leandros A. Skaltsounis: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources. Dimitrios Bilalis: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization.
Funding
⌅| Funding agencies/institutions | Project / Grant |
|---|---|
| European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation | T1EDK-04301 |