Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 23 (1)
January-March 2025, 21257
ISSN-L: 1695-971X, eISSN: 2171-9292
https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2025231-21257

Evaluation of European-developed hemp cultivars (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes

Evaluación de cultivares de cáñamo (Cannabis sativa L.) desarrollados en Europa en respuesta a diferentes regímenes hídricos

Angeliki Kousta

Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3190-5315

Panayiota Papastylianou

Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece.

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2621-1183

Petros Tzimas

Division of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupoli, Zografou, 15771, Athens, Greece.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7296-267X

Leandros A. Skaltsounis

Division of Pharmacognosy and Natural Products Chemistry, Department of Pharmacy, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimioupoli, Zografou, 15771, Athens, Greece.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8458-3180

Dimitrios Bilalis

Laboratory of Agronomy, Department of Crop Science, Agricultural University of Athens, 11855 Athens, Greece.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4585-7257

Abstract

Aim of study: The present study aimed to evaluate the effect of water deficit on the growth and yield of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars under semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.

Area of study: Southern Greece, Athens.

Material and methods: Three different irrigation regimes (well-watered; IRR100, mild water-stressed; IRR75, and severe water-stressed; IRR50) were supplied to determine their effect on five hemp cultivars growth, seed and cannabidiol (CBD) yield, and water productivity by a three-year field experiment.

Main results: Water deficit (IRR50) decreased plant height by 38.7%, 15.8%, and 18.7%, and above-ground biomass by 71.9%, 74.6%, and 27.7% during 2019, 2020, and 2021 years respectively, compared to IRR100. The IRR50 treatment reduced inflorescence length, seed weight per inflorescence, and seed yield by 19%, 27.6%, and 29.9% respectively. The longest inflorescences with the most seeds were performed by Cannabis sativa ʻFedora 17ʼ with mean values ranging from 35.1 cm to 36.8 cm, and 223 to 247 seeds per inflorescence across growing seasons. By increasing drought stress to IRR50, the cannabidiolic acid concentration increased thrice, and CBD and total cannabidiol (CBD total) concentrations were almost duplicated with Cannabis sativa ʻFerimonʼ recording the highest total CBD yield. All cultivars showed sensitivity to water deficit reducing their water productivity and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index values. Cannabis sativa ʻFutura 75ʼ recorded the highest water productivity under all water regimes.

Research highlights: Water stress (IRR50) limited hemp biomass and seed yield, whereas enhanced CBD yield of inflorescences. ʻFutura 75ʼ cultivar is the most suitable for biomass production, ʻFerimonʼ cultivar for CBD production, and ʻFedora 17ʼ cultivar is appropriate for the dual-purpose production of both biomass and seed.

Keywords: 
CBD production; hemp cultivars; plant growth; seed yield; water management; water use efficiency.
Resumen

Objetivo del estudio: Evaluar el efecto del déficit hídrico en el crecimiento y rendimiento de cultivares de cáñamo (Cannabis sativa L.) bajo condiciones semiáridas mediterráneas.

Área de estudio: Sur de Grecia, Atenas.

Material y métodos: Se aplicaron tres regímenes de riego diferentes (bien regado; IRR100, estrés hídrico moderado; IRR75 y estrés hídrico severo; IRR50) para determinar su efecto en el crecimiento, el rendimiento de semillas y cannabidiol (CBD), así como en la productividad hídrica de cinco cultivares de cáñamo mediante un experimento de campo de tres años.

Resultados principales: El déficit hídrico (IRR50) redujo la altura de la planta en un 38.7%, 15.8% y 18.7%, y la biomasa aérea en un 71.9%, 74.6% y 27.7% durante los años 2019, 2020 y 2021, respectivamente, en comparación con IRR100. El tratamiento IRR50 disminuyó la longitud de la inflorescencia, el peso de semillas por inflorescencia y el rendimiento de semillas en un 19%, 27.6% y 29.9%, respectivamente. Cannabis sativa ʻFedora 17ʼ presentó las inflorescencias más largas y con mayor cantidad de semillas, con valores medios entre 35.1 cm y 36.8 cm, y entre 223 y 247 semillas por inflorescencia en todas las temporadas de cultivo. Con el aumento del estrés hídrico a IRR50, la concentración de ácido cannabidiólico se triplicó, y las concentraciones de CBD y cannabidiol total (CBD total) casi se duplicaron, registrándose el mayor rendimiento de CBD total en Cannabis sativa ʻFerimonʼ. Todos los cultivares mostraron sensibilidad al déficit hídrico, reduciendo su productividad hídrica y los valores del Índice de Diferencia Normalizada de Vegetación. Cannabis sativa ʻFutura 75ʼ registró la mayor productividad hídrica en todos los regímenes de riego.

Aspectos destacados de la investigación: El estrés hídrico (IRR50) limitó la biomasa y el rendimiento de semillas de cáñamo, mientras que aumentó la producción de CBD en las inflorescencias. El cultivar ʻFutura 75ʼ es el más adecuado para la producción de biomasa, el cultivar ʻFerimonʼ para la producción de CBD, y el cultivar ʻFedora 17ʼ para la producción dual de biomasa y semillas.

Palabras clave: 
crecimiento de plantas; cultivares de cáñamo; eficiencia en el uso del agua; gestión del agua; producción de CBD; rendimiento de semillas.

The translation of the title, abstract, and keywords from the original version in English to Spanish has been generated using OpenAI, ChatGPT GPT-4o mini (2025).

La traducción al español del título, resumen y palabras clave de la versión original en inglés ha sido generada utilizando OpenAI., ChatGPT GPT-4o mini (2025).

Received: 29/06/2024. Accepted: 28/09/2024. Published: 08/05/2025

Citation: Kousta, A; Papastylianou, P; Tzimas, P; Skaltsounis, LA.; Bilalis, D (2025). Evaluation of European-developed hemp cultivars (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, Volume 23, Issue 1, 21257. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2025231-21257

CONTENT

Introduction

 

Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) is an annual, dioecious, and genetically diverse plant that belongs to the world’s oldest domesticated crops. It has been cultivated worldwide for many centuries for fiber, seed, essential oils, and cannabinoids (Adesina et al., 2020Adesina I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
) until its prohibition after World War II. Recently, the interest in hemp cultivation has been rising due to the demand for non-food crops, renewable raw materials (Baldini et al., 2018Baldini M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
), and medicines by natural compounds (Hesami et al., 2023Hesami M, Pepe M, Baiton A, Jones AMP, 2023. Current status and future prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv 62: 108074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074
). Nowadays, many European countries have reintroduced the legal cultivation of genotypes that contain less than 0.3% of the psychoactive substance Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in their dry inflorescences (EC, 2023European Commission. Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species. Available online: https://op.europa.eu (accessed on 25 May 2024).
).

Even though hemp is a polyvalent, and multifactional plant of great economic magnitude due to its industrial (Karche et al., 2019Karche T, Singh MR, 2019. The application of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for a green economy: A review. Turk J Bot 43: 710-723. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1907-15
), medicinal, recreational (Hesami et al., 2023Hesami M, Pepe M, Baiton A, Jones AMP, 2023. Current status and future prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv 62: 108074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074
), and nutritional (Kruger et al., 2022Krüger M, van Eeden T, Beswa D, 2022. Cannabis sativa cannabinoids as functional ingredients in snack foods–Historical and developmental aspects. Plants 11(23): 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233330
) potential, there is a scientific gap around the crop cultivation. Legal restrictions resulted in a deficiency of science-based knowledge regarding hemp agronomical practices, such as crop inputs, and cultivar choice (Tang et al., 2016Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
). According to the literature, special attention has been paid to the effects of plant nutrition, especially nitrogen supply (Anderson et al., 2021Anderson SL, Pearson B, Kjelgren R, Brym Z, 2021. Response of essential oil hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growth, biomass, and cannabinoid profiles to varying fertigation rates. PLoS One 16(7): e0252985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252985
; Papastylianou et al., 2021Papastylianou P, Kousta A, Kakabouki I, Travlos I, Iliadi D, 2021. Nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield traits of dual-purpose industrial hemp cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 69(1): 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1959551
) monopolizing the scientific interest to the detriment of other cultivation practices. As a result, water-related studies are scarce ( Consentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Gill et al., 2022Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
; Park et al., 2022Park SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
) given that water deficiency is a significant constraint of hemp production (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Meanwhile, crop water use efficiency and drought tolerance are still under disputation (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
).

Drought is considered to have the greatest effect on hemp cultivation and agriculture compared with other relevant abiotic stresses (Gao et al., 2018Gao C, Cheng C, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tang Q, Xin, P, Liu T, Yan Z, Guo Y, Zang, G, 2018. Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int J Genomics 2018: 3057272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3057272
). Plants initiate several physiological, biochemical, and morphological changes that induce plant growth, development, and productivity to tolerate drought stress (Jiang et al., 2021Jiang Y, Sun Y, Zheng D, Han C, Cao K, Xu L, Liu S, Cao Y, Feng N, 2021. Physiological and transcriptome analyses for assessing the effects of exogenous uniconazole on drought tolerance in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Sci Rep 11: 14476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93820-6
). Short-term water stress is weighted with reduced leaf transpiration rate and stomatal conductance, while long-term drought effects lead to decreased carbon fixation, damaged relative chlorophyll content, and net photosynthesis (Gill et al., 2022Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
). In addition, the water content of plant cells is decreased causing them to shrink and inhibit cell division. The lasting water deficit regulates nutrient transport within the plant and promotes leaf senescence (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Thus, the overall increase in leaf length, stem, and above-ground biomass is limited (Gao et al., 2018Gao C, Cheng C, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tang Q, Xin, P, Liu T, Yan Z, Guo Y, Zang, G, 2018. Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int J Genomics 2018: 3057272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3057272
).

Literature indicates that long-term water deficit conditions promote the acceleration of flowering, while fiber growth and maturation are delayed resulting in decreased fiber yields. In addition, findings showed that above-ground biomass and seed yield are sensitive to water stress (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Garcia-Tejero et al., 2014García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Pérez-Álvarez R, Hernández A, Casano S, Morón M, Muriel-Fernández ML, 2014. Impact of plant density and irrigation on yield of hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment. J Agr Sci Tech 16:887-895. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9987-en.html
; Tang et al., 2016Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
). In terms of the cannabinoid content, the research on hemp response to water stress is sparse (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; Park et al., 2022Park SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
) and the experimental findings are contrasting. A previous study conducted in a controlled environment showed that the concentration of cannabinoids of interest increased in response to water stress (Park et al., 2022Park SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
). On the contrary, no significant differences were presented in cannabidiol (CBD) concentrations between well-watered and water-stressed hemp plants in a field production setting (Garcia-Tejero et al., 2019García-Tejero IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
).

The above-mentioned hazardous effects caused by water deficiency could become even more intense considering the severity and frequency of extreme weather events, and water shortages provoked by global warming. To overcome the continued water deficiencies and achieve a high hemp yield, irrigation may become necessary in most regions worldwide. As a short-day plant, hemp requires high moisture throughout its growing season (Adesina et al., 2020Adesina I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
). Studies in Europe showed that the crop needs a total of 500-700 mm of water with at least 250-350 mm during the vegetative stage (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Adesina et al., 2020Adesina I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129
; Herppich et al., 2020Herppich WB, Gusovius HJ, Flemming I, Drastig K, 2020. Effects of drought and heat on photosynthetic performance, water use and yield of two selected fiber hemp cultivars at a poor-soil site in Brandenburg (Germany). Agronomy 10(9): 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091361
; Blandinières & Amaducci, 2022Blandinières H, Amaducci S, 2022. Adapting the cultivation of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to marginal lands: A review. GCB Bioenergy 14(9):1004-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12979
).

Until now there has been a variation in the optimum water requirements of crop since research on the effects of environmental conditions and genotype is incomplete. A large proportion of the variation in hemp drought response has been attributed to hemp genotypes (Babaei & Ajdanian, 2020Babaei M, Ajdanian L, 2020. Screening of different Iranian ecotypes of cannabis under water deficit stress. Sci Hortic 260: 108904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108904
). The large genetic variability derived from the development of improved monoecious cultivars worsens the determination of optimal water supply. According to the literature, the sexual type, and the maturity stage of cultivars impact the humidity needs of hemp crop (Spanno et al., 2022Spano M, Di Matteo G, Ingallina C, Sobolev AP, Giusti AM, Vinci G, Cammarone S, Tortora C, Lamelza L, Prencipe SA, Gobbi L, Botta B, Marini F, Campiglia E, Mannina L, 2022. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescences as novel food: The effect of different agronomical practices on chemical profile. Foods, 11(22): 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223658
). Late-maturity cultivars show higher water demands in Europe regardless of being monoecious or dioecious (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
). Studies carried out in semi-arid Mediterranean conditions indicated that early monoecious cultivars require at least 250 mm of irrigation water, while late dioecious show greater needs of about 450 mm of water (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al. 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
). Additionally, the optimal water supply differed based on the end-use products and the derivates of cultivars (Spanno et al., 2022Spano M, Di Matteo G, Ingallina C, Sobolev AP, Giusti AM, Vinci G, Cammarone S, Tortora C, Lamelza L, Prencipe SA, Gobbi L, Botta B, Marini F, Campiglia E, Mannina L, 2022. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescences as novel food: The effect of different agronomical practices on chemical profile. Foods, 11(22): 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223658
).

While the hemp market is expanding and the demand for its products is rising, there is a call for intensification of research around the best agronomical practices. For recently reintroduced crops such as hemp, there is an even more urgent need for an irrigation management design. Besides, more and more improved monoecious cultivars have been added to the EU common catalogue of agricultural plant species, whereas the effect of water deficiency on their growth and yield characteristics is unknown. To understand the relationship between water-use and drought stress of the improved cultivars, their adaptability and susceptibility evaluation is necessary.

Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effect of different water regimes on five monoecious dual-purpose cultivars, included in the European Catalogue and commercially available to farmers. The experiment was designed to provide data about the impact of adequate and limited water availability on the growth and development of plants, seed yield characteristics, and CBD yields of each studied cultivar. Furthermore, the response of cultivars to water regimes was determined through the water productivity under field semi-arid Mediterranean conditions.

Material and methods

 

Experimental Site and Growth Conditions

 

A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural University farm located in Athens (southern Greece: latitude 37°58′ N, longitude 23°32′ E, altitude 30 m above sea level), and repeated in three consecutive growing years, 2019, 2020, and 2021. The soil was clay loam (29% clay, 35.4% silt, and 35.6% sand) with pH 7.48, available phosphorus (P) 13.5 mg kg−1 soil, available potassium (K) 201 mg kg−1 soil, and 2.7% organic matter. The experimental field was positioned near an automatic meteorological station (Davis Vantage Pro2 Weather Station; Davis Instruments Corporation, California, USA), and the average air temperature and rainfall were recorded daily. The weather data were reported as mean monthly data for May to August during the studied years (Figure 1). The mean air temperature values did not show any significant variability between the growing seasons recording mean monthly values of 26.1 ℃, 25.9 ℃, and 26.9 ℃ for the growing periods 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The long-term mean annual rainfall at the site is 435.9 mm (1989-2018), but temporal variability is high. The highest total rainfall for the periods May to August was recorded at the growing season 2020 (64 mm) followed by 2021 (34.2 mm) and 2019 (4.6 mm). Intense phenomena did not occur during the three-year study.

Monthly means of the mean (Taver) air temperatures (°C) and total rainfall (mm) for 2019 (Y1), 2020 (Y2), and 2021 (Y3) growing seasons, and the long-term 30-year average (1989–2018) at the experimental site in Athens, Greece.
Figure 1.  Monthly means of the mean (Taver) air temperatures (°C) and total rainfall (mm) for 2019 (Y1), 2020 (Y2), and 2021 (Y3) growing seasons, and the long-term 30-year average (1989–2018) at the experimental site in Athens, Greece.

Experimental Set Up

 

The experimental design was a randomized complete block design replicated three times in a split-plot restriction with irrigation regimes as the main plots and hemp cultivars as the sub-plots. Five hemp cultivars widely grown in European environments, and often selected by Greek farmers, were used in the study. These cultivars were monoecious with THC content below 0.3% as required by EC regulation, and suitable for seed and/or dual-purpose cultivation, while differed in earliness and origin (Table 1). Moreover, cultivars were chosen based on their morphological, and maturity traits. Seeds of industrial hemp cultivars were obtained from iHempFarms EAD (Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria).

Table 1.  Origin, sexual type, and maturity group of the hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars used in the research.
Cultivar Origin Sexual type Maturity group
Futura 75 France Monoecious Late
Fedora 17 France Monoecious Medium-Early
Ferimon France Monoecious Medium
Santhica 27 France Monoecious Medium-Early
Uso 31 Ukraine Monoecious Early

The irrigation regimes consisted of three different water regimes supplying 100% of the crop’s water requirement (the well-watered; IRR100), 75% (the mild water-stressed; IRR75), and 50% (severe water-stressed; IRR50). A surface drip irrigation system was used for irrigation, A 16 mm diameter polyethylene pipe with inline pressure compensating drippers at 0.33 m intervals was placed on one side of each hemp row. The average discharge of emitters was 2.3 l h-1 at the 0.1 MPa. The crop was irrigated with 80 mm for the first two weeks after sowing to achieve a successful crop establishment. The irrigation was stopped one week before harvest. The total water inputs including the precipitation amount and the irrigation water that were applied during each growing season are described in Table 2.

Table 2.  Seasonal water inputs in hemp crop based on three irrigation regimes (IRR100, IRR75, and IRR50) in Athens, Greece across 2019 (Y1), 2020 (Y2), and 2021 (Y3).
Y1 Y2 Y3
Well Watered Stress Level Well Watered Stress Level Well Watered Stress Level
IRR100 IRR75 IRR50 IRR100 IRR75 IRR50 IRR100 IRR75 IRR50
Irrigation water (mm) 488 386 284 488 386 284 488 386 284
Precipitation (mm) 4.6 64 34.2
Total (mm) 492.6 390.6 288.6 552 450 348 522.2 420.2 318.2

The plot size of each irrigation treatment was 5 m x 12 m and the spacing between each main plot was 4 m to minimize water movement among treatments. The experimental plots were 5 m x 2.4 m and consisted of 8 rows 0.30 m apart. The experimental area was plowed at a depth of 25 cm followed by secondary tillage with a disc harrow to prepare the crop seedbed. An organic fertilizer 7-4-7 (Biogen, Phytothreptiki S.A., Athens, Greece) at a rate of 140 kg N, 80 kg P2O5, and 140 kg K2O ha-1 was broadcast applied two days before seeding and incorporated into the soil using a cultivator. Hemp seeds were sown by hand at a depth of 3 cm on 9 May 2019, 14 May 2020, and 13 May 2021 to achieve the planned crop density of 120-125 plants m-2. No pesticides were utilized during the crop establishment and growth, while the emerged weed species were hand-removed when necessary. Agronomic practices were the same during all three growing seasons.

Determination of Agronomical Traits, and Seed Yield Components

 

To evaluate the effect of irrigation regimes (IRR) on hemp agronomical traits, plant height, and dry above-ground biomass were documented from five randomly selected plants of the inner plant row of each plot at 61 days after sowing (DAS). Plant height was measured from the base of the plant to the growing tip. For the above-ground biomass determination, plants were cut to ground level with manual shears, and the sampled plant material was oven-dried at 80 ℃ for 72 hours until their weight remained constant and reweighted.

To measure hemp Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), a Trimble® GreenSeeker® handheld sensor (Trimble Agriculture Division, Westminster, CO, USA) was used at 61 DAS in 2020 and 2021. The sensor unit has self-contained illumination in both near-infrared (NIR) (visible 770 nm) and red (visible 660 nm) ranges (Tremblay et al., 2009Tremblay N, Wang Z, Ma BL, Belec C, Vigneault P, 2009. A comparison of crop data measured by two commercial sensors for variable-rate nitrogen application. Precision Agric 10: 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9080-2
) corresponding to the subsequent Equation (1):

N D V I = N I R - R e d N I R + R e d
 (1)

Regarding the procedure of NDVI records, the sensor was placed parallel to the direction of the crop rows and held stable at a height of 25-30 cm above the leaf area on bright days at midday. The device was slowly moved within the limits of the quadrat for 5 s as recommended by Kong et al. (2019)Kong B, Yu H, Du R, Wang Q, 2019. Quantitative estimation of biomass of alpine grasslands using hyperspectral remote sensing. Rangeland Ecol Manag 72(2): 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.10.005
. This procedure was repeated thrice per sub-subplot, then recorded values were averaged.

At the end of seed maturity (BBCH:2307), all plants in an area of 6 m2 from the middle rows were hand-harvested above soil level, and their seeds were air-dried, threshed, cleaned, and weighed for seed yield determination, after removing the empty seeds. Among the harvested plants, samples from 10 plants were taken randomly, separated into stems, leaves, inflorescences, and seeds, weighed, and the length of main and secondary inflorescences and seed numbers were determined. The seed density index (SDI, cm−1) was calculated as the quotient between seed number per plant and mean inflorescence length. Hemp plants were harvested at 112, 108, and 109 DAS in the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons respectively.

To characterize the effective water use of hemp cultivars, the Water Productivity index (WP) was selected to define the relationship between crop produced and the amount of water involved in crop production. WP was calculated as the ratio of biomass yield and the sum of all components of water inflow via air and ground that are used for crop growth and the total water amount during the total crop growth period (Prochnow et al., 2012Prochnow A, Drastig K, Klauss H, Berg W, 2012. Water use indicators at farm scale: methodology and case study. Food Energy Secur 1: 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.6
).

Cannabinoids Analysis

 

At the female flowering stage (BBCH: 2301-2302), which was determined when 50% of bracts formed, inflorescence samples were harvested from the top of uniform plants in each subplot. All plant material was air-dried at 25 ℃, powdered with a commercial mill, and sifted using a sieve shaker (BA 200 N, CISA, Spain). The sample fractions with a particle size of less than 1 mm were stored at -20℃ until analysis.

The CBD concentrations of samples were determined by the technique of Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography with Photodiode Array Detection (UPLC – PDA) according to the methodology described by Tzimas et al. (2021)Tzimas PS, Petrakis EA, Halabalaki M, Skaltsounis LA, 2021. Effective determination of the principal non-psychoactive cannabinoids in fiber-type Cannabis sativa L. by UPLC-PDA following a comprehensive design and optimization of extraction methodology. Anal Chim Acta 1150: 338200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338200
and expressed as cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), and total cannabidiol (CBD total). The CBDA concentration was determined as the acidic form which when exposed to environmental factors, such as light and heat is decarboxylated and converted into CBD. In each inflorescence sample, total CBD concentration (%) was calculated as a sum of CBD (%) and CBDA (%) multiplicated by 0.877 which accounts for the differences in molar mass between the acid and neutral forms of the cannabinoid.

Statistical Analysis

 

All data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the software STATGRAPHICS Centurion XVII Version statistical software (Statpoint Technologies Inc., The Plains, VA, USA). Differences between treatments and their interactions were compared by using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test, where probabilities are equal to or less than 0.05 (a≤5%).

Results

 

Agronomic Growth Traits of Hemp

 

Based on the combined analysis of variance, significant effects of irrigation regimes (IRR), and cultivar (C) were observed on the hemp growth traits in all growing seasons (p<0.001). Irrigation regimes significantly impacted hemp height and above-ground biomass recording the highest values in well-watered plants (IRR100) of all the cultivars. Both treatments of water stress mild (IRR75) and severe (IRR50) resulted in plants of reduced growth regardless of cultivars. The water deficit (IRR50) was the most limiting factor decreasing the plant height by 38.7%, 15.8%, and 18.7%, and the above-ground biomass by 71.9%, 74.6%, and 27.7% during 2019, 2020, and 2021 respectively compared to fully irrigated plants. Among the cultivars, the most compact plants with the shortest stems and minimum biomass were obtained from the early flowering Cannabis sativa ʻUso 31ʼ regardless of irrigation. The tallest plants were recorded in Cannabis sativa ‘Santhica 27’, while the highest values of dry biomass were observed in the late French cultivar Cannabis sativa ‘Futura 75’. Moreover, the factor of year impacted significantly on both plant height (p<0.001), and above-ground biomass (p<0.01). Within the growing seasons, the tallest plants including the highest biomass were performed in the second experimental year regardless of irrigation and cultivar treatments. All three factors showed no interaction for the studied plant growth traits (p>0.05, ns) (Table 3).

Table 3.  The effects of the experimental factors on the average values and the analysis of height, above-ground biomass, and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) of hemp crop across the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons. IRR: irrigation regimes (IRR100: well-watered; IRR75: mild water-stressed; IRR50: severe water-stressed); C: cultivars; Y: growing years (Y1:2019, Y2:2020, Y3:2021).
Height (m) Above-ground biomass (g m-2) NDVI
Cultivar Irrigation Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3
Futura 75 IRR100 2.16 1.97 2.20 1543 2006 1419 0.807 0.856
IRR75 1.25 1.90 2.04 866.4 1118 1129 0.765 0.842
IRR50 1.13 1.72 1.77 398.4 509.9 982.7 0.785 0.854
Mean 1.52 1.86 2.01 935.9 1211 1177 0.786 0.851
Santhica 27 IRR100 2.23 2.24 2.27 962.4 1232 640.6 0.802 0.846
IRR75 1.59 1.94 2.14 578.6 740.2 628.8 0.760 0.854
IRR50 1.48 1.83 1.85 268 338 578.7 0.763 0.840
Mean 1.77 2.00 2.08 603.0 769.9 616.0 0.775 0.847
Fedora 17 IRR100 1.65 1.86 1.85 1140 1780 987.5 0.807 0.812
IRR75 1.21 1.68 1.70 722.0 757 649.9 0.777 0.804
IRR50 1.06 1.55 1.50 371.2 343.9 622.0 0.763 0.834
Mean 1.30 1.70 1.68 744.3 960.4 753.1 0.782 0.817
Ferimon IRR100 1.50 1.80 1.81 980.2 932 758.0 0.822 0.850
IRR75 1.12 1.53 1.67 530.0 352.2 628.3 0.773 0.838
IRR50 0.95 1.52 1.46 251.0 211.6 578.7 0.772 0.834
Mean 1.19 1.62 1.65 587.1 498.6 655 0.789 0.841
Uso 31 IRR100 1.45 1.70 1.55 825.2 1056 267.8 0.783 0.823
IRR75 1.04 1.50 1.44 484 615.0 232.1 0.778 0.822
IRR50 0.89 1.44 1.29 243.6 307.0 182.0 0.747 0.794
Mean 1.13 1.55 1.42 517.6 659.3 227.3 0.769 0.813
LSDYxIRR (0.05) 0.094 150.1 0.018
LSDYxC (0.05) 0.122 193.8 0.023
LSDIRRxC (0.05) 0.122 193.8 0.014
Analysis of variance Y *** ** ***
IRR *** *** **
C *** *** **
Y x IRR *** *** *
Y x C * ** *
IRR x C * ** ns
Y x IRR x C ns ns ns

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05)

In addition, the effect of water deficit on hemp growth was well depicted in the vegetation index since a significant effect of irrigation regimes was recorded on NDVI (p<0.01). Index values were boosted by the maximum irrigation rate (IRR100) in all cultivars. The highest mean value of NDVI (0.82) was recorded in fully irrigated plants, while treatments of mild (IRR75) and severe (IRR50) water stress reduced mean values by 2.4%, and 2.7%, respectively compared to well-watered plants. Moreover, the effect of the cultivar was of high significance for NDVI during the three growing seasons. The greatest values of NDVI were recorded from the ‘Futura 75’ with a mean value of 0.82, while the mean values of other cultivars ranged between 0.79, and 0.81, respectively. Among the growing seasons, the highest values of NDVI were recorded in the third growing year 2021 (Y3). Even if all cultivars were positively affected by the full irrigation, the two factors showed no interaction for NDVI (p>0.05, ns) as well as the three factors (Table 3).

Seed Yield, and Yield Contributing Characteristics

 

Regarding the yield parameters of hemp, irrigation demonstrated a significant effect on inflorescence length, seed weight per inflorescence, and seed yield in all three experimental years. Both water stress treatments reduced the studied yield characteristics without differing significantly in all cultivars. Among them, the severe water deficit (IRR50) was the most damaging treatment decreasing the mean values of inflorescence length, seed weight per inflorescence, and seed yield by 19%, 27.6%, and 29.9% respectively, compared to fully irrigated plants. Even though irrigation regimes did not differ significantly for the seed density index (p>0.05, ns), water stress treatments IRR75 and IRR50 decreased mean values recording 6.07 cm-1 and 6.17 cm-1 respectively compared to 6.97 cm-1 of well-watered plants (Table 4).

Table 4.  The effects of the experimental factors on the average values and the analysis of yield components, and water productivity of hemp across the 2019, 2020, and 2021 growing seasons. IRR: irrigation regimes (IRR100: well-watered; IRR75: mild water-stressed; IRR50: severe water-stressed); C: cultivars; Y: growing years (Y1:2019, Y2:2020, Y3:2021)
Inflorescence length (cm) Seed number/Inflorescence Seed Yield (t ha-1) Seed density index (cm-1) Water Productivity (kg m-3)
Cultivar Irrigation Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y1 Y2 Y3
Futura 75 IRR100 26.0 23.8 25.9 193.7 197 180.5 2.06 2.41 1.95 7.43 8.34 7.11 3.13 3.63 2.72
IRR75 24.2 23 23.3 169.2 185.7 160.3 2.00 2.28 1.50 6.93 8.00 6.93 2.22 2.48 2.69
IRR50 22.6 21.3 21.5 156.7 167.0 149.2 1.70 1.46 1.42 7.82 7.96 6.86 1.38 1.47 2.66
Mean 24.3 22.7 23.5 173.2 183.2 163.3 1.92 2.05 1.62 7.39 8.10 6.97 2.24 2.53 2.69
Santhica 27 IRR100 35.5 33.8 34.6 113.8 177.3 122.0 1.43 1.57 1.92 3.18 5.22 3.53 1.95 2.23 1.23
IRR75 27.9 26.0 29.7 106.3 170.8 113.0 1.26 1.49 1.36 3.85 6.66 3.82 1.48 1.64 1.50
IRR50 25.6 24.0 25.8 102.1 162.5 100.2 1.10 1.40 1.28 4.18 6.74 3.87 0.93 0.97 1.57
Mean 29.6 27.9 30.0 107.4 170.2 111.7 1.26 1.49 1.52 3.74 6.21 3.74 1.45 1.62 1.43
Fedora 17 IRR100 39.8 37.0 39.7 344.8 292.2 308.5 3.23 3.27 2.99 8.96 7.98 7.87 2.31 3.23 1.89
IRR75 35.8 34.8 35.3 191.7 231.0 187.3 2.87 2.90 2.68 5.45 6.70 5.29 1.85 1.69 1.45
IRR50 34.8 33.5 33.8 182.1 216.7 172.2 2.02 2.57 2.65 5.40 6.33 5.12 1.29 0.99 1.68
Mean 36.8 35.1 36.3 239.6 246.6 222.7 2.71 2.91 2.77 6.60 7.00 6.09 1.82 1.97 1.71
Ferimon IRR100 32.1 30.5 32.5 222.9 229.0 228.2 2.40 2.84 2.11 7.43 7.23 6.97 1.99 1.69 1.45
IRR75 30.8 28.0 29.9 188.2 198.2 170.5 2.32 2.56 1.60 6.26 6.97 5.78 1.36 0.78 1.50
IRR50 26.1 25.0 25.7 175.7 184.2 155.3 1.52 1.09 1.50 6.81 7.56 6.17 0.87 0.61 1.57
Mean 29.6 27.8 29.4 195.6 203.8 184.7 2.08 2.16 1.74 6.83 7.25 6.31 1.68 1.91 0.51
Uso 31 IRR100 37.7 35.8 36.8 259.3 262.7 263 2.31 2.28 2.22 6.93 7.28 7.14 1.24 1.37 0.55
IRR75 33.4 30.7 32.2 187.2 228.3 173.5 1.81 1.96 1.69 5.49 7.48 5.43 0.84 0.88 0.49
IRR50 31.8 28.7 30.8 179.1 187.8 168.5 1.65 1.60 1.57 5.74 6.52 5.49 1.25 1.39 0.52
Mean 34.3 31.7 33.3 208.5 226.3 201.7 1.92 1.95 1.83 6.05 7.09 6.02 1.55 1.65 0.62
LSDYxIRR (0.05) 3.26 42.4 0.64 1.62 0.341
LSDYxC (0.05) 4.21 54.7 0.83 2.09 0.440
LSDIRRxC (0.05) 4.21 54.7 0.83 2.09 0.440
Analysis of variance Y ns ns ns * ns
IRR *** *** ** ns ***
C *** *** *** *** ***
Y x IRR ns ns ns ns ***
Y x C ns * ns * **
IRR x C * * * * *
Y x IRR x C ns ns ns ns ns

The combined analysis of variance also demonstrated the highly significance effect of cultivar on all yield parameters of hemp (p<0.001). The longest inflorescences with numerous seeds were performed in the medium-maturity cultivar ‘Fedora 17’ with mean values ranging between 35.1 cm and 36.8 cm, and between 223 and 247 seeds per inflorescence respectively during the three growing seasons. Among the cultivars, the highest mean seed yield was performed from the ‘Fedora 17’ (2.80 t ha-1) and was twice the mean yield of the less productive ‘Santhica 27’ (1.42 t ha-1) regardless of irrigation and year. The lower seed density index was poorly performed on average from the ‘Santhica 27’ recording 4.56 cm-1, while the highest values of 7.49 cm-1 were presented in the cultivar ‘Futura 75’. Between the growing seasons, plants with the most seeds, performing the highest seed yield, and the greatest seed density index were produced in the second experimental year regardless of irrigation and cultivar treatments. All three factors showed no interaction for the studied hemp yield components (p>0.05) (Table 4).

Results revealed that water productivity was affected by the irrigation and cultivar (p<0.001). Increasing irrigation water to full significantly increased water productivity compared to water-stressed plants, whereas drought stress showed just the opposite effects in most of the studied cases. Among the cultivars, ‘Futura 75’ recorded the highest mean value of 2.49 kg m-3 followed by ‘Fedora 17’ with 1.82 kg m-3. The lowest mean value was 0.95 kg m-3 and was observed in ‘Uso 31’ plants. Moreover, no significant difference was noticed among years for water productivity, whereas the interactions of year with irrigation, year with cultivar, and irrigation with cultivar showed a large interaction. All three factors showed no interaction in the case of water productivity (p>0.05, ns) (Table 4).

Cannabidiol Yield Characteristics

 

Water regimes noticed a significant impact on cannabidiol yield in both the 2019 and 2020 growing seasons (p<0.001). In 2019, the highest CBD concentration was recorded in the inflorescences of fully irrigated plants without differing meaningfully from the water-stressed plants of IRR50. As for CBDA, the severe water stress increased the concentration by 27% compared to well-watered plants regardless of cultivar. Thus, the total CBD concentration was observed in the fully irrigated plants recording 1.25 % w/w followed by the 1.03% w/w of severe water-stressed plants (IRR50) without varying consistently. In the next growing season, the effect of different water regimes on cannabidiol yield was evident, and severe water stress seemed the most enhancing treatment compared to full irrigation and mild water stress. By increasing drought stress to IRR50, the CBD and CBD total concentrations were almost duplicated, and CBDA concentration increased thrice (Table 5).

Table 5.  The effects of the experimental factors on the average values and the analysis of cannabidiol (CBD), cannabidiolic acid (CBDA), and total cannabidiol (CBD Total) concentration of hemp across the 2019, and 2020 growing seasons. IRR: irrigation regimes (IRR100: well-watered; IRR75: mild water-stressed; IRR50: severe water-stressed); C: cultivars; Y: growing years (Y1:2019, Y2:2020).
CBD (%w/w) CBDA (%w/w) CBD total (%w/w)
Cultivar Irrigation Y1 Y2 Y1 Y2 Y1 Y2
Futura 75 IRR100 1.48 0.73 0.25 0.14 1.77 0.95
IRR75 0.55 0.64 0.057 0.35 0.60 0.95
IRR50 1.39 0.96 0.46 0.71 1.82 1.59
Mean 1.14 0.78 0.26 0.40 1.40 1.16
Santhica 27 IRR100 0.53 0.38 0.017 0.031 0.55 0.41
IRR75 0.35 0.43 0.004 0.003 0.35 0.44
IRR50 0.37 0.93 0.078 0.004 0.44 0.93
Mean 0.42 0.58 0.033 0.013 0.45 0.59
Fedora 17 IRR100 0.82 0.49 0.062 0.15 0.88 0.62
IRR75 0.76 0.67 0.101 0.29 0.85 0.92
IRR50 0.69 0.86 0.140 0.42 0.82 1.22
Mean 0.76 0.67 0.101 0.29 0.85 0.92
Ferimon IRR100 1.86 0.62 0.37 0.17 2.14 0.77
IRR75 1.60 0.92 0.33 0.34 1.86 1.21
IRR50 1.34 1.21 0.28 0.50 1.59 1.66
Mean 1.60 0.92 0.33 0.34 1.86 1.21
Uso 31 IRR100 0.77 0.16 0.15 0.069 0.90 0.09
IRR75 0.58 0.19 0.13 0.091 0.70 0.21
IRR50 0.39 0.22 0.12 0.11 0.50 0.32
Mean 0.58 0.19 0.13 0.09 0.70 0.21
LSDYxIRR 0.119 0.055 0.143
LSDYxC 0.154 0.071 0.184
LSDIRRxC 0.188 0.087 0.226
Analysis of variance Y *** ** ***
IRR *** *** ***
C *** *** ***
Y x IRR *** *** ***
Y x C *** *** ***
IRR x C *** *** ***
Y x IRR x C ** ** **

* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; ns, not significant (p > 0.05)

Furthermore, the analysis of variance revealed the significant effect of cultivar on CBD concentration (p<0.001). ‘Ferimon’ inflorescences produced the highest CBD concentration recording 1.59% w/w and 0.92% w/w in 2019 and 2020, respectively. As for CBDA and CBD total, ‘Ferimon’ showed the greatest concentrations marginally higher than ‘Futura 75’. Among the cultivars, the early maturity ‘Uso 31’ produced inflorescences with the lowest CBD Total concentration. For all the cannabidiol yield components, the year effect was significant, and the highest values were recorded in the second experimental year. All three factors also showed a large interaction for cannabidiol yield components (p<0.01) (Table 5).

Discussion

 

Hemp has been characterized as a high-yield crop, requiring low inputs, whereas experimental data prove its high-water demands (Blandinieres & Amaducci, 2022Blandinières H, Amaducci S, 2022. Adapting the cultivation of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to marginal lands: A review. GCB Bioenergy 14(9):1004-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12979
). Especially in dry environments, such as the Mediterranean, the required water demands for cultivation are not enclosed by precipitation, and irrigation is considered necessary (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
). The available literature on crop irrigation is scarce, especially given that newly developed cultivars have been added to the EU Common List of Cultivated Plant Species. Since the hemp market and economic interest are rising, there is a need to intensify the research on crop irrigation management.

Agronomic Traits of Hemp

 

By reducing the water supplied the crop decreased significantly the performed plant height and biomass. Among the irrigation regimes, the severe water stress treatment (IRR50) was the most damaging factor in hemp growth reducing the plant height and biomass up to 24.1% and 62.6%, respectively, regardless of cultivars and years. These findings could be attributed to the long-term effects of water stress that negatively affects plant morphology (Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
) through the decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, and passage of CO2 in plants. Previous research confirmed the reduction of hemp height due to water deficit, as obtained from field studies in Spain (García-Tejero et al., 2014García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Pérez-Álvarez R, Hernández A, Casano S, Morón M, Muriel-Fernández ML, 2014. Impact of plant density and irrigation on yield of hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment. J Agr Sci Tech 16:887-895. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9987-en.html
), USA (Campbell et al., 2019Campbell BJ, Berrada AF, Hudalla C, Amaducci S, McKay JK, 2019. Genotype × environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse responses to environmental factors. Agrosystems Geosci Environ 2(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057
), and Greece (Scordia et al., 2022Scordia D, Papazoglou EG, Kotoula D, Sanz M, Ciria CS, Pérez J, Maliarenko O, Prysiazhniuk O, von Cossel M, Greiner BE, Lazdina D, Makovskis K, Lamy I, Ciadamidaro L, Grezeriat LP, Corinzia SA, 2022. Towards identifying industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14(7): 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12935
). Similar negative effects on hemp biomass were recorded in the literature (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Tang et al., 2018Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951
; Herppich et al., 2020Herppich WB, Gusovius HJ, Flemming I, Drastig K, 2020. Effects of drought and heat on photosynthetic performance, water use and yield of two selected fiber hemp cultivars at a poor-soil site in Brandenburg (Germany). Agronomy 10(9): 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091361
; Gill et al., 2022Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
).

Regarding the growth traits, five cultivars showed significant differences between them (p<0.001) since their growth was determined by genotype and environment. The important effect of variety on hemp growth has been confirmed by many authors (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
; Baldini et al., 2018Baldini M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
). Field experiments demonstrated the superiority in biomass growth of the cultivars ‘Futura 75’, ‘Santhica 27’, and ‘Fedora 17’ compared to ‘Uso 31’ (Flajšman & Kocjan Ačko, 2020Flajšman M, Kocjan Ačko D, 2020. Influence of edaphoclimatic conditions on stem production and stem morphological characteristics of 10 European hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) varieties. Acta Agric Slov 115(2): 399-407. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1528
). As for the impact of the environment on hemp cultivars, it has been mentioned that a more extended photoperiod with longer days, increases plant height and biomass since it delays flowering, and increases the duration of the vegetative stage. In countries geographically close to Greece, long-duration days favor the production of fiber and biomass. That fact justified the superiority of late flowering ‘Futura 75’ over ‘Fedora 17’ and ‘Ferimon’ cultivars in dry biomass (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
). Similar results were recorded in Italy according to which ‘Futura 75’ scored higher stem biomass than ‘Fedora 17’, ‘Uso 31’ (Baldini et al., 2018Baldini M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
), and ‘Ferimon’ (Ferfuia et al., 2021Ferfuia C, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Piani B, Cattivello C, Dorigo G, Baldini M, 2021. Performance and stability of different monoecious hemp cultivars in a multi-environments trial in North-Eastern Italy. Agronomy 11(7): 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071424
).

Irrigation contributed positively to hemp height and biomass of all cultivars. Comparable results were obtained in field studies (Campbell et al., 2019Campbell BJ, Berrada AF, Hudalla C, Amaducci S, McKay JK, 2019. Genotype × environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse responses to environmental factors. Agrosystems Geosci Environ 2(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057
; Scordia et al., 2022Scordia D, Papazoglou EG, Kotoula D, Sanz M, Ciria CS, Pérez J, Maliarenko O, Prysiazhniuk O, von Cossel M, Greiner BE, Lazdina D, Makovskis K, Lamy I, Ciadamidaro L, Grezeriat LP, Corinzia SA, 2022. Towards identifying industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14(7): 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12935
). In addition, ‘Futura 75’ and ‘Santhica 27’ were more resistant to severe water stress (IRR50). The negative effects of deficit irrigation on leaf and stem dry weight of the ‘Futura 75’ have been reported by Cosentino et al. (2013)Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
. The sensitivity of ‘Ferimon’ to water stress conditions has also been shown by Kumar (2021)Kumar IMKV, 2021. Production and quality of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.
. However, the present literature about the resistance and susceptibility of hemp cultivars to water stress is in its infancy.

Concerning NDVI, the results showed that deficit irrigation regimes were restrictive on the leaves' photosynthetic surface and normal plant growth. Severe drought (IRR50) reduced the NDVI values by 2.7% compared with full irrigation. The lowest values caused by inadequate water availability are also in line with the formation of reduced plant biomass. In addition, decreased values are justified by the fact that water-stressed plants can lead to rapid aging of the leaves, limited photosynthetic rate, and effectiveness (Cosentino et al., 2013Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059
). The cultivar effect was of high significance for NDVI during the three growing seasons. The greatest values were recorded by ‘Futura 75’, a result that agrees with the greatest biomass that was performed. In contrast, the ‘Uso 31’ formed plants with the lowest biomass, leaf surface, and soil cover, and thus the lowest values of NDVI. Similar results for the NDVI of ‘Futura 75’ and ‘Ferimon’ cultivars have been reported by Wulff (2022)Wulff HM, 2022. Growth and development of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Master’s thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand. 146 pp.
.

Seed Yield, and Yield Contributing Characteristics

 

Since a significant part of global hemp production is intended for seed, the effect of irrigation on the number of seeds per inflorescence, and seed yield was evaluated. The results demonstrated the negative effects of deficit irrigation on both studied characteristics for all experimental years. Plants subjected to the IRR75 and IRR50 treatments caused the formation of inflorescences with fewer and lighter seeds compared to fully irrigated plants. The reduction in seed yield can be attributed primarily to the reduced number of seeds per plant rather than reduced individual seed weight. These results probably indicate that, under conditions of intense water stress, hemp prioritizes the production of filled seeds over the number of them. This is a possible hedging strategy to ensure the successful reproduction of the plant under stress conditions, as also reported by Gill et al. (2022)Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
. Comparable results have been reported in the existing literature (Kumar et al., 2021Kumar IMKV, 2021. Production and quality of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.
; Gill et al., 2022Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331
). In addition, the inflorescence length was measured, and the seed density index was calculated to identify differences among cultivars of contrasting yield potential. Both traits have been proposed promising in breeding programs for other crops such as wheat (Ferrante et al., 2020Ferrante A, Savin R, Slafer GA, 2020. Floret development and spike fertility in wheat: Differences between cultivars of contrasting yield potential and their sensitivity to photoperiod and soil N. Field Crops Res 256: 107908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107908
). The results revealed that water stress treatments reduced the SDI, but the differences were insignificant among irrigation regimes.

Significant differences were noted between cultivars for inflorescence length, seed number per inflorescence, seed yield, and SDI (p<0.001). The longest inflorescences with the most seeds, the highest seed yield the greatest SDI values were performed in the medium-maturity cultivar ‘Fedora 17’. The least productive cultivar in terms of the seed studied traits appeared to be the ‘Santhica 27’. Similar results have been reported for ‘Futura 75’, ‘Santhica 27’, and ‘Fedora 17’ by Tsaliki et al. (2021)Tsaliki E, Kalivas A, Jankauskiene Z, Irakli M, Cook C, Grigoriadis I, Panoras I, Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, 2021. Fibre and seed productivity of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy 11(1): 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010171
. This superiority of ‘Fedora 17’ over the other cultivars has also been reported by Tang et al. (2016)Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026
, and Baldini et al. (2018)Baldini M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162
.

Water Productivity

 

Hemp water productivity is a quantitative index used to determine the relationship between crop production and the total amount of water needed in crop production. It was selected to quantify the effect of irrigation and schedule the appropriate decisions regarding water management. In this study, water productivity was affected by both irrigation and cultivar. Plants of all cultivars reduced their water productivity as the amount of irrigated water decreased, while the maximum values were recorded when they were fully irrigated. This finding demonstrated that additional irrigation water was required in the water-stressed plants of all cultivars. Moreover, all five studied cultivars showed sensitivity to water deficit reducing their yield and water productivity. Among the cultivars, ‘Futura 75’ recorded the highest water productivity under full irrigation and water stress conditions. The shortest values were shown by ‘Uso 31’, especially under severe water stress conditions (IRR50). The values of the present study varied between 0.49 and 3.63 kg m-3 as in the study of Drastig et al. (2020)Drastig K, Flemming I, Gusovius HJ, Herppich WB, 2020. Study of water productivity of industrial hemp under hot and dry conditions in Brandenburg (Germany) in the year 2018. Water 12(11): 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112982
.

Cannabidiol Yield Characteristics

 

The results showed that irrigation significantly affected the concentration of inflorescences in CBD, CBDA, and CBD Total in the two growing seasons (p<0.05). During the first growing season, no significant differences were shown in CBD, CBDA, and CBD total concentrations between adequately and poorly irrigated hemp cultivars. Similar results were recorded by Garcia-Tejero et al. (2019)García-Tejero IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
in a field experiment and Duong et al. (2023)Duong H, Pearson B, Anderson S, Berthold E, Kjelgren R, 2023. Variation in hydric response of two industrial hemp varieties (Cannabis Sativa) to induced water stress. Horticulturae 9(4): 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040431
in greenhouse conditions. During 2020, both deficit irrigation regimes led to higher concentrated inflorescences in CBD, CBDA, and CBD total compared to fully irrigated plants. It was observed that the maximum water stress level (IRR50) was the most favorable to produce higher concentrations of the specific cannabinoids. Similar results have been reported in the existing literature (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; García-Tejero et al., 2019García-Tejero IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524
; Morgan et al., 2024Morgan W, Singh J, Kesheimer K, Davis J, Sanz-Saez A, (2024). Severe drought significantly reduces floral hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) yield and cannabinoid content but moderate drought does not. Environ Exp Bot 219: 105649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105649
), while some researchers recommend controlled drought as a means of increasing cannabinoid yield (Caplan et al., 2019Caplan D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18
; Park et al., 2022Park SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y
).

Concerning the CBD yield, the results of both growing seasons (2019, 2020) showed that the cultivars differed (p<0.001). Among the cultivars, ‘Futura 75’ and ‘Ferimon’ showed the highest content of the studied cannabinoids, while the lowest was recorded in ‘Santhica 27’ and ‘Uso 31’. Similar results were noted by Glivar et al. (2020)Glivar T, Eržen J, Kreft S, Zagožen M, Čerenak A, Čeh B, Tavčar Benković E, 2020. Cannabinoid content in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties grown in Slovenia. Ind Crop Prod 145: 112082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112082
, where the cultivars Ferimon and ‘Fedora 17’ excelled in total cannabidiol content over ‘Santhica 27’ and ‘Uso 31’. Our results on the CBD, CBDA, and CBD Total content of the five varieties are verified by Sikora et al. (2011)Sikora V, Berenji J, Latković D, 2011. Influence of agroclimatic conditions on content of main cannabinoids in industrial hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.). Genetika 43(3): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1103449S
, and Burgel et al. (2020)Burgel L, Hartung J, Pflugfelder A, Graeff-Hönninger S, 2020. Impact of growth stage and biomass fractions on cannabinoid content and yield of different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes. Agronomy 10(3): 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030372
.

Among the growing seasons, the greatest hemp growth was noticed in the second experimental year based on the plant height, and above-ground biomass values. Furthermore, the longest inflorescences with the most seeds, the greatest seed yield, and the highest SDI and WP values were also recorded in 2020. Concerning the studied CBD yield components, the second growing year was the most productive performing inflorescences with the maximum concentrations. These findings could be attributed to climatic conditions during the critical crop establishment, and the first growth months of 2020 compared with the 2019 and 2021 growing seasons. More specifically, the highest levels of precipitation and the shortest mean air temperature were recorded from May to June 2020.

In conclusion, water stress negatively affected the hemp growth and seed yield of all studied cultivars. Among irrigation deficit treatments, severe water stress (IRR50) was the most limiting factor for biomass and seed yield, whereas enhanced the cannabidiol yield of inflorescences. The French cultivar of medium maturity ‘Ferimon’ was boosted the most by the severe drought recording the highest CBD Total (%w/w) concentrations. Under full irrigation conditions, all cultivars documented their greatest plant growth, seed yield, and water productivity. Results revealed that ‘Futura 75’ followed by ‘Fedora 17’ were the most suitable for biomass production as they had the highest biomass yield. Both ‘Fedora 17’ and ‘Ferimon’ showed high yields for seed production. Among the tested cultivars, ‘Fedora 17’ combined high biomass and seed yield, noted great water productivity and thus is considered suitable for dual-purpose production. Further investigation is needed to build up a database about the impact of adequate and limited water availability on the growth and productivity of hemp plants.

Competing interests

 

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Authors’ contributions

 

Angeliki Kousta: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Panayiota Papastylianou: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Petros Tzimas: Data curation, Investigation, Validation. Leandros A. Skaltsounis: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources. Dimitrios Bilalis: Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization.

Funding

 
Funding agencies/institutions Project / Grant
European Regional Development Fund of the European Union and Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship, and Innovation T1EDK-04301

 

References

 

Adesina I, Bhowmik A, Sharma H, Shahbazi A, 2020. A review on the current state of knowledge of growing conditions, agronomic soil health practices and utilities of hemp in the United States. Agriculture 10(4): 129. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040129

Anderson SL, Pearson B, Kjelgren R, Brym Z, 2021. Response of essential oil hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) growth, biomass, and cannabinoid profiles to varying fertigation rates. PLoS One 16(7): e0252985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252985

Babaei M, Ajdanian L, 2020. Screening of different Iranian ecotypes of cannabis under water deficit stress. Sci Hortic 260: 108904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108904

Baldini M, Ferfuia C, Piani B, Sepulcri A, Dorigo G, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Cattivello C, 2018. The Performance and Potentiality of Monoecious Hemp (Cannabis Sativa l.) Cultivars as a Multipurpose Crop. Agronomy 8(9): 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy8090162

Blandinières H, Amaducci S, 2022. Adapting the cultivation of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to marginal lands: A review. GCB Bioenergy 14(9):1004-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12979

Burgel L, Hartung J, Pflugfelder A, Graeff-Hönninger S, 2020. Impact of growth stage and biomass fractions on cannabinoid content and yield of different hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) genotypes. Agronomy 10(3): 372. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030372

Campbell BJ, Berrada AF, Hudalla C, Amaducci S, McKay JK, 2019. Genotype × environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse responses to environmental factors. Agrosystems Geosci Environ 2(1): 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057

Caplan D, Dixon M, Zheng Y, 2019. Increasing inflorescence dry weight and cannabinoid content in medical cannabis using controlled drought stress. HortScience 54(5): 964-969. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI13510-18

Cosentino SL, Riggi E, Testa G, Scordia D, Copani V, 2013. Evaluation of European developed fibre hemp genotypes (Cannabis sativa L.) in semi-arid Mediterranean environment. Ind Crop Prod 50: 312-324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.07.059

Drastig K, Flemming I, Gusovius HJ, Herppich WB, 2020. Study of water productivity of industrial hemp under hot and dry conditions in Brandenburg (Germany) in the year 2018. Water 12(11): 2982. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12112982

Duong H, Pearson B, Anderson S, Berthold E, Kjelgren R, 2023. Variation in hydric response of two industrial hemp varieties (Cannabis Sativa) to induced water stress. Horticulturae 9(4): 431. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9040431

European Commission. Common Catalogue of Varieties of Agricultural Plant Species. Available online: https://op.europa.eu (accessed on 25 May 2024).

Ferrante A, Savin R, Slafer GA, 2020. Floret development and spike fertility in wheat: Differences between cultivars of contrasting yield potential and their sensitivity to photoperiod and soil N. Field Crops Res 256: 107908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107908

Ferfuia C, Zuliani F, Danuso F, Piani B, Cattivello C, Dorigo G, Baldini M, 2021. Performance and stability of different monoecious hemp cultivars in a multi-environments trial in North-Eastern Italy. Agronomy 11(7): 1424. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11071424

Flajšman M, Kocjan Ačko D, 2020. Influence of edaphoclimatic conditions on stem production and stem morphological characteristics of 10 European hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) varieties. Acta Agric Slov 115(2): 399-407. https://doi.org/10.14720/aas.2020.115.2.1528

Gao C, Cheng C, Zhao L, Yu Y, Tang Q, Xin, P, Liu T, Yan Z, Guo Y, Zang, G, 2018. Genome-wide expression profiles of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to drought stress. Int J Genomics 2018: 3057272. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3057272

García-Tejero IF, Durán-Zuazo VH, Pérez-Álvarez R, Hernández A, Casano S, Morón M, Muriel-Fernández ML, 2014. Impact of plant density and irrigation on yield of hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) in a Mediterranean semi-arid environment. J Agr Sci Tech 16:887-895. http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-9987-en.html

García-Tejero IF, Zuazo VD, Sánchez-Carnenero C, Hernández A, Ferreiro-Vera C, Casano S, 2019. Seeking suitable agronomical practices for industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivation for biomedical applications. Ind Crop Prod 139: 111524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111524

Gill AR, Loveys BR, Cowley JM, Hall T, Cavagnaro TR, Burton RA, 2022. Physiological and morphological responses of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) to water deficit. Ind Crop Prod 187: 115331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115331

Glivar T, Eržen J, Kreft S, Zagožen M, Čerenak A, Čeh B, Tavčar Benković E, 2020. Cannabinoid content in industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties grown in Slovenia. Ind Crop Prod 145: 112082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.112082

Herppich WB, Gusovius HJ, Flemming I, Drastig K, 2020. Effects of drought and heat on photosynthetic performance, water use and yield of two selected fiber hemp cultivars at a poor-soil site in Brandenburg (Germany). Agronomy 10(9): 1361. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091361

Hesami M, Pepe M, Baiton A, Jones AMP, 2023. Current status and future prospects in cannabinoid production through in vitro culture and synthetic biology. Biotechnol Adv 62: 108074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2022.108074

Jiang Y, Sun Y, Zheng D, Han C, Cao K, Xu L, Liu S, Cao Y, Feng N, 2021. Physiological and transcriptome analyses for assessing the effects of exogenous uniconazole on drought tolerance in hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Sci Rep 11: 14476. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93820-6

Karche T, Singh MR, 2019. The application of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) for a green economy: A review. Turk J Bot 43: 710-723. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1907-15

Kong B, Yu H, Du R, Wang Q, 2019. Quantitative estimation of biomass of alpine grasslands using hyperspectral remote sensing. Rangeland Ecol Manag 72(2): 336-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rama.2018.10.005

Krüger M, van Eeden T, Beswa D, 2022. Cannabis sativa cannabinoids as functional ingredients in snack foods–Historical and developmental aspects. Plants 11(23): 3330. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11233330

Morgan W, Singh J, Kesheimer K, Davis J, Sanz-Saez A, (2024). Severe drought significantly reduces floral hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) yield and cannabinoid content but moderate drought does not. Environ Exp Bot 219: 105649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105649

Papastylianou P, Kousta A, Kakabouki I, Travlos I, Iliadi D, 2021. Nitrogen utilization efficiency and yield traits of dual-purpose industrial hemp cultivars in a Mediterranean environment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 69(1): 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2021.1959551

Park SH, Pauli CS, Gostin EL, Staples SK, Seifried D, Kinney C, Vanden Heuvel BD, 2020. Effects of short-term environmental stresses on the onset of cannabinoid production in young immature flowers of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). J Cannabis Res 4: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-021-00111-y

Prochnow A, Drastig K, Klauss H, Berg W, 2012. Water use indicators at farm scale: methodology and case study. Food Energy Secur 1: 29-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.6

Scordia D, Papazoglou EG, Kotoula D, Sanz M, Ciria CS, Pérez J, Maliarenko O, Prysiazhniuk O, von Cossel M, Greiner BE, Lazdina D, Makovskis K, Lamy I, Ciadamidaro L, Grezeriat LP, Corinzia SA, 2022. Towards identifying industrial crop types and associated agronomies to improve biomass production from marginal lands in Europe. GCB Bioenergy 14(7): 710-734. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12935

Sikora V, Berenji J, Latković D, 2011. Influence of agroclimatic conditions on content of main cannabinoids in industrial hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.). Genetika 43(3): 449-456. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1103449S

Spano M, Di Matteo G, Ingallina C, Sobolev AP, Giusti AM, Vinci G, Cammarone S, Tortora C, Lamelza L, Prencipe SA, Gobbi L, Botta B, Marini F, Campiglia E, Mannina L, 2022. Industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) inflorescences as novel food: The effect of different agronomical practices on chemical profile. Foods, 11(22): 3658. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11223658

Tang K, Fracasso A, Struik PC, Yin X, Amaducci S, 2018. Water- and nitrogen-use efficiencies of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) based on whole-canopy measurements and modeling. Front Plant Sci 9: 951. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00951

Tang K, Struik PC, Yin X, Thouminot C, Bjelková M, Stramkale V, Amaducci S, 2016. Comparing hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) cultivars for dual-purpose production under contrasting environments. Ind Crop Prod 87: 33-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.026

Tremblay N, Wang Z, Ma BL, Belec C, Vigneault P, 2009. A comparison of crop data measured by two commercial sensors for variable-rate nitrogen application. Precision Agric 10: 145-161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-008-9080-2

Tsaliki E, Kalivas A, Jankauskiene Z, Irakli M, Cook C, Grigoriadis I, Panoras I, Vasilakoglou I, Dhima K, 2021. Fibre and seed productivity of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) varieties under Mediterranean conditions. Agronomy 11(1): 171. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11010171

Tzimas PS, Petrakis EA, Halabalaki M, Skaltsounis LA, 2021. Effective determination of the principal non-psychoactive cannabinoids in fiber-type Cannabis sativa L. by UPLC-PDA following a comprehensive design and optimization of extraction methodology. Anal Chim Acta 1150: 338200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2021.338200

Kumar IMKV, 2021. Production and quality of industrial hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in response to water regimes. Doctoral thesis. University of Tasmania, Australia.

Wulff HM, 2022. Growth and development of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.). Master’s thesis. Lincoln University, New Zealand. 146 pp.