<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Spanish Journal of  Agricultural Research</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">e0404</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">2171-9292</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2171-9292</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020182-15721</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>conception rate</subject><subject>twining rate; services per pregnancy</subject><subject>age at first calving; fetal losses</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effects of  in utero  heat stress on subsequent reproduction performance of first-calf Holstein heifers</article-title><subtitle>Effects of  in utero  heat stress on subsequent reproduction performance of first-calf Holstein heifers</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Chavez </surname>
		<given-names>María I.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept. Veterinary Science, Torreon, Coahuila, 27054 Mexico.</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>  García</surname>
		<given-names>José E.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept.  Animal Nutrition, Saltillo, Coahuila, 25315 Mexico.</aff>
	</contrib>
	<contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname> Véliz</surname>
		<given-names>Francisco  G.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept. Veterinary Science, Torreon, Coahuila, 27054 Mexico.</aff>
	</contrib>
	<contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname> Gaytán</surname>
		<given-names>Leticia R.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept. Veterinary Science, Torreon, Coahuila, 27054 Mexico.</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>de Santiago</surname>
		<given-names>Ángeles </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept. Veterinary Science, Torreon, Coahuila, 27054 Mexico.</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Mellado</surname>
		<given-names>Miguel </given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Autonomous  Agrarian University  Antonio Narro, Dept.  Animal Nutrition, Saltillo, Coahuila, 25315 Mexico.</aff>
		  <author-notes>
        <corresp id="c1">should be addressed to Miguel Mellado:  <email xlink:href="  mmellbosq@yahoo.com   ">  mmellbosq@yahoo.com   </email>
        </corresp>
	 </author-notes>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>06</month>
        <year>2020</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>18</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
		<history>
        <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2019-09-13">
          <day>13</day>
          <month>09</month>
          <year>2019</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-06-18">
          <day>18</day>
          <month>06</month>
          <year>2020</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2020   2020  INIA.  This  is  an  open  access  article  distributed  under  the  terms  of  the  Creative  Commons  Attribution  4.0  International (CC-by 4.0) License.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></license>
      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>Effects of  in utero  heat stress on subsequent reproduction performance of first-calf Holstein heifers</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			<italic>Aim of study:</italic>  To determine the reproductive performance of heifers gestated under maternal conditions of heat stress in late gestation.
		</p>
		<p>
			<italic>Area of study:</italic>  Northern Mexico (25° 32’  N, 103° 23’ W).
		</p>
		<p>
			<italic>Material and methods:</italic>    The study included reproductive records of 4976 first-calf Holstein heifers in a hot environment.
		</p>
		<p>
			<italic>Main results:</italic>    Heifers  born  to  cows  experiencing  no  heat  stress  three  months  before  parturition  but  with  a  THI  >83  at  calving  were  older (p&lt;0.05)  at  first  calving  (743  ±  67  vs.  729  ±  55  days)  than  heifers  gestated  under  maternal  conditions  of  heat  stress.  A  two-fold  increase (p&lt;0.01)  in  pregnancy  rate  occurred  in  heifers  gestated  under  maternal  conditions  of  no  heat  stress  during  two  or  three  months  before pregnancy  and  no  heat  stress  at  parturition,  compared  with  heifers  gestated  under  maternal  conditions  of  no  heat  stress.  Overall,  across  in utero  heat  stress  one,  two  or  three  months  before  calving,  pregnancy  rate  to  all  services  was  higher  (p&lt;0.05)  for  first-calf  heifers  gestated under  maternal  conditions  of  no  heat  stress  during  delivery,  compared  with  heifers  gestated  under  maternal  conditions  of  heat  stress  (66.7 vs.  51.1%).  Median  days  for  getting  pregnant  was  higher  (140  d)  for  heifers  whose  dams  were  exposed  to  THI  >83  at  calving  than  heifers whose mothers were exposed to &lt;76 or 76-83 (117 and 114 d) at calving.
		</p>
		<p>
			<italic>Research highlights:</italic>      These data suggest that in utero heat stress during the last three months of gestation negatively  affects the reproductive performance of first-calf Holstein heifers.
		</p>
		</abstract>
		<kwd-group>
				<title>Abbreviations used</title>
				<kwd>AI  (artificial  insemination)</kwd>
				<kwd>AFC  (age  at  first  calving)</kwd>
				<kwd>BCS  (body  condition  score)</kwd>
				<kwd>DM  (dry  matter)</kwd>
				<kwd>FTAI (fixed-time artificial insemination)</kwd>
				<kwd>IgG (immunoglobulin G)</kwd>
				<kwd>THI (temperature-humidity index)</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		<funding-group>
				<award-group>
					<funding-source>The authors received no specific funding for this work </funding-source>
					<award-id></award-id>
				</award-group>
			</funding-group>
		<notes>
			<p>
				<bold>Authors’ contributions:</bold> Data  acquisition:  MIC,  LG.  Study  design  and  drafted  the  manuscript:  MM.  Analyzed  the  results:  JEG,  MM. Revised the manuscript and reviewed the pertinent literature: FGV,  AS.  All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.</p>
			<p>
				<bold>Competing interests:</bold>  All  authors  declare  that  there  are  no  actual  or  potential  conflicts  of  interest  among  the  authors  and  other  people  or organizations that could inappropriately bias their work.</p>
			<p>
				<bold>Citation:</bold> Chavez,  MI; García,  JE;  Véliz,  FG; Gaytán, LR; de Santiago,  A; Mellado,  M (2020). Effects of  in utero  heat  stress  on  subsequent  reproduction  performance  of  first-calf  Holstein  heifers.  Spanish  Journal  of  Agricultural  Research,  Volume  18,  Issue  2,  e0404. <a xlink:href=" https://https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020182-15721"></a>https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2020182-15721</p>
			</notes>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body><sec>
			<title>Introduction</title>
				<p>High body temperature during late pregnancy causes distresses in the intrauterine environment, which can induce functional alterations in the fetus that could persist at maturity (Skibiel et al., 2018). A positive consequence of maternal heat stress during late gestation on calf function during postnatal life is the enhancement thermo-tolerance at maturity by increasing the ability to dissipate body heat which reduces their core body temperature, which is reflected in lower sweating rate and rectal temperature when exposed to high ambient temperatures (Ahmed et al., 2017).</p><p>However, other potential physiological processes which alter fetal programming in cows born from heat-stressed cows have a detrimental effect on productive and reproductive response in dairy cows. Lower body weight at 12 months of age has been observed in utero heat-stressed cows, although no difference in this trait at maturity was detected, but the productive life of these cows in the herd was reduced (Monteiro et al., 2016). Also, maternal heat stress in late gestation depress birthweight of calf at parturition and hampers mammary growth and the absorption of IgG, which lower serum IgG concentration in young calves (Tao et al., 2012, Tao &amp; Dahl, 2013; Monteiro et al., 2014; Laporta et al., 2017).</p><p>While the negative effects of in utero heat stress on birth weight, weaning weight, passive immune transfer and milk yield in dairy cattle have been well documented, information on the exposure of developing fetuses to heat stress in utero in late gestation on subsequent reproductive performance in dairy cattle is incomplete. Likewise, the stages of pregnancy in which heat stress has the most adverse effects on fetuses have not been well established. Therefore, this study was carried out to determine if bovine fetal exposure to heat stress during the last three months of pregnancy negatively alters the subsequent reproductive performance of these animals. It was hypothesized that first-calf heifers born to cows exposed to heat stress during late gestation would decrease reproductive performance by increasing age at first calving, decreasing pregnancy rate, and requiring greater services per pregnancy.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Material and methods</title>
				<p><bold>Animal management and facilities</bold></p>
	  			<p>The experimental procedures and animal care conditions were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Department of the Autonomous Agrarian University Antonio Narro. This study included 4976 f irst-lactation Holstein heifers from a large commercial dairy operation in a hot arid environment (26° N, elevation 1140 m, mean annual rainfall 230 mm, mean annual temperature 23.7 ºC). The dairy operation consisted of approximately 3000 lactating Holstein cows housed in open-dirt pens equipped with a fixed metal framework shade in the center of pens that provided 4 m2 of shade per cow. Shades also covered feed alleys. The study took place from 2015 to 2018.</p><p>All diets were offered as total mixed rations (49% forage and 51% concentrate; DM basis) and were served at 07:00 and 14:00 h. Feed was offered calculating 35 g refusals for each kg offered. Diets were formulated to meet the net energy requirements (1.62 Mcal/kg net energy of lactation and 18% crude protein) for lactating Holstein cows weighing 650 kg and producing 42 kg of milk containing 35 g/kg of fat and 30 g/kg of protein when consuming 24 kg/d of DM (NRC, 2001). Cows in this study were born to dams not exposed to heat stress (temperature-humidity index, THI &lt;76), exposed to moderate heat stress (THI 76-83), or exposed to high heat stress (THI &gt;83) during one, two or three months before delivery and at parturition.</p><p>The THI value of 76 was chosen because it was deemed as the upper critical temperature, as hyperthermia (based on increased rectal temperature) would be expected at THI above this value (Dikmen &amp; Hansen, 2009). Kaufman et al. (2018) found that THI of 76.4 practically did not alter rectal temperature of Holstein cows. It is worth mentioning that the upper critical THI used in the current study is higher than values of 72 for dairy cows in Georgia and 74 for cows in Arizona (Bohmanova et al., 2007), although these values derived from studies relating THI with losses in milk production.</p>Reproductive management<p>All cows in this herd were vaccinated against diseases impairing fertility, such as brucellosis (Brucella abortus strain RB51 vaccine), infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, bovine respiratory syncytial virus, bovine viral diarrhea, para-influenza, Campylobacter fetus and leptospirosis (5-serovars). Herd veterinarians examined fresh cows to identify and treat cows with postpartum infection and inf lammation in the reproductive tract such as retained placenta, metritis, and clinical endometritis.</p><p>Cows became eligible for artificial insemination (AI) after 50 days postpartum. Technicians kept trying to achieve pregnancy until 360 days in milk or when milk yield dropped below 25 kg/d; this practice leads to more than 12 services per cow in some animals, and consequently to extended lactations (&gt;500 days). First-calf heifers not pregnant around 200 post-partum and with more than 3 services were submitted for fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) using the Ovsynch protocol.</p><p>Nonpregnant first-calve heifers were observed for estrus three times a day, for approximately 30 min. Estrus detection was reinforced with the aid of pedometers, and AI was conducted based on visual observation of estrous behavior, according to the a.m. - p.m. guideline. Commercial non-sexed frozen-thawed semen from multiple sires was used across all months of the year. Pregnancy was detected by palpation of the uterus per rectum about 45 days post-AI.</p>
	  			<p><bold>Data collection</bold></p>
				<p>Data from reproductive examinations and AI were collected by the herd veterinarians during daily herd health revision for cows included in this study. For each animal, the following variables were recorded: age at first calving (AFC), occurrence of dystocia (prolonged assisted extraction), retained fetal membranes (retained fetal membranes for more than 24 h), occurrence of twinpregnancies, metritis, premature calves (&lt;265 days, as determined by AI records) and fetal losses (expulsion of a fetus or presence of extraembryonic membranes and vaginal discharges; return to service after being confirmed pregnant). Also, pregnancy rate at first service, pregnancy rate to all services, and time from calving to pregnancy were recorded. Cows experiencing calving-related disorders were appropriately treated by the herd veterinarians, so that they were healthy by the time the first breeding postpartum occurred. Body condition scores (BCS) were determined at calving using the scoring system suggested by Edmonson et al. (1989).</p><p>Additional variables were THI, the day dams delivered the first-calf heifers included in the study, THI one, two or three months before calves were born. Climatic data were obtained from a meteorological station situated 3 km away from the dairy operation for the duration of the study. Information recorded was daily maximum temperatures (mercury thermometer under full shade) and relative humidity. The following equation was used for calculation of THI (highest daily temperature in Celsius degrees; RH refers to maximum relative humidity; Mader et al. 2006):</p>
	  			<p>THI = (0.8 × temperature) + (%RH/100) × (temperature - 14.4)] + 46.4</p>
	  			<p><bold>Statistical analyses</bold></p>
				<p>To analyze the combined effect of maximum ambient temperature and humidity contributing to pregnancy (binary outcome), fetal losses, twin births, premature births and dystocic parturition, a logistic regression model of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used. The model included the following potentially explanatory variables of interest: THI when first-calf heifers were born, THI one, two or three months before the first-calf heifers were born and one-way interactions. Interactions were only retained if significant at the 0.15 level. The SAS model included fixed effects of THI groups with first-calf heifers within the THI groups as a random effect. Covariates used in the model included BCS at calving and year of breeding.</p><p>AFC was analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS. The model included the main effects of THI at various stages of fetal life and one-way interactions; year and BCS at calving were included as covariates. The number of services per pregnancy was evaluated by the bivariate Wilcoxon rank-sum test (non-parametric; proc npar1way of SAS). The effect of THI at various periods in late gestation on the interval from calving to pregnancy was analyzed using survival plots generated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis performed with Statgraphics Centurionversion XVII software (Statgraphics Technol., Inc., The Plains, Virginia). The final models were assessed for collinearity using the variance inflation factor (VIF option) in SAS; collinearity did not exist. Statistical significance was set at p&lt;0.05.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Results</title>
				<p>The percentage of fetal losses (16%), twining rate (0.7%), dystocic parturition (10%), and premature calves (5%) were not affected (p&gt;0.10) by the THI prevailing during the last three months of the uterine life of f irst-calf heifers included in this study. THI when calves were born affected (p&lt;0.05) AFC of these first-calf heifers. THI one, two, or three months previous to delivery did not affect this trait. There was a THI at parturition by THI one month before calving interaction (p&lt;0.05). When heat stress was moderate or high for two months previous to parturition, the age at first calving was shorter (p&lt;0.05) in cows born to dams not exposed to heat stress the day of parturition (Table 1). Likewise, heifers born to cows not exposed (THI &lt;76) or exposed to severe heat stress (THI&gt;83) three months before parturition but with no heat stress at parturition of their dams presented shorter AFC than heifers whose mothers experienced mild or severe heat stress at parturition.</p><p>Pregnancy rates at first service are summarized in Table 2. Pregnancy rate at first service was severely depressed (p&lt;0.05) in first-calf heifers born to dams exposed to moderate (THI 76-83) heat stress one month before calving and severe heat stress (THI &gt;83) the day of parturition. Regardless of the magnitude of heat stress exposure of dams in late gestation, first-calf heifers born to dams exposed to heat stress the day of calving presented a marked reduction in first-service pregnancy rates compared with heifers born to dams not exposed to severe heat stress. There was a THI at calving of dams by THI one month before calving interaction (p&lt;0.05).</p><p>Pregnancy rates to all services are summarized in Table 3. THI at calving and during the first, second, and third month before parturition of dams affected (p&lt;0.01) this reproductive variable. THI at calving of dams × THI one month before calving was an interaction term signif icantly associated with pregnancy rates to all services. Overall, across THI one, two or three months before calving of dams, pregnancy rate was depressed (p&lt;0.05) when parturition of their dams coincided with severe heat stress.</p><p>The number of services per pregnancy confirmed at d 45 after the last AI was smaller in first-calf heifers from dams experiencing moderate and severe heat stress one, two and three months before calving and THI 76-83 atcalving (Table 4). For first-calf heifers born to dams exposed to different THI categories at birth, one, two and three months before calving, the median days open for heifers undergoing severe heat stress in utero was larger (p&lt;0.05) than that of heifers exposed to moderate or no heat stress in utero (Fig. 1).</p>
	  
	   <fig id="T1">
     <label>Table 1.</label>
     <caption>
             <title> The effect of the temperature-humidity index (THI) experienced by first-calf Holstein heifers at delivery and previous to delivery (in utero) on the subsequent age at first calving in a hot environment (mean annual temperature 23.7 °C).</title>
   </caption>
   <graphic xlink:href="e0404_tab_1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</fig>
	   <fig id="T2">
     <label>Table 2.</label>
     <caption>
             <title> Pregnancy rate at first service of first-calf Holstein heifers gestated under maternal conditions of no heat stress (temperature-humidity index; THI&lt;76), moderate heat stress (THI 76-83), or severe heat stress (THI>83) at delivery and one, two or three months before calving in a hot environment.</title>
   </caption>
   <graphic xlink:href="e0404_tab_2" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</fig>
		   <fig id="T3">
     <label>Table 3.</label>
     <caption>
             <title> Pregnancy rate to all services of first-calf Holstein heifers gestated under maternal conditions of no heat stress (temperature-humidity index; THI&lt;76), moderate heat stress (THI 76-83), or severe heat stress (THI >83) at delivery and one, two or three months before calving in a hot environment.</title>
   </caption>
   <graphic xlink:href="e0404_tab_3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</fig>
	  <fig id="T4">
     <label>Table 4.</label>
     <caption>
             <title>  Services per conception in first-calf Holstein heifers gestated under maternal conditions of no heat stress (temperature-humidity index; THI&lt;76) moderate heat stress (THI 76-83) or severe heat stress (THI>83) at delivery and one, two or three months before calving in a hot environment.</title>
   </caption>
   <graphic xlink:href="e0404_tab_4" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</fig>
	  <fig id="F1">
     <label>Figure 1.</label>
     <caption>
             <title>  Kaplan-Meier  survival  curves  for  the  proportion  of  first-calf  heifers  gestated  under  maternal  conditions  of  heat  stress  in late gestation. Days open were lower for heifers whose dams were exposed to  THI &lt;76 and those born at 76-83 and >83 three months before  calving  (p%lt;0.001;  Wilcoxon  test).  Median  days for getting  pregnant  were  117, 114, and  140 for heifers  whose dams  were exposed to  THI &lt;76, 76-83, and >83 at calving, respectively. Median days for getting pregnant were 115, 115, and 120 for heifers whose  dams were exposed to  THI &lt;76, 76-83, and >83 one month before calving, respectively. Median days for getting pregnant was 114, 119 and 117 for heifers  whose dams were exposed to  THI &lt;76, 76-83 and >83 two months before  calving,  respectively. Median days for getting  pregnant were 115, 117, and 117 for heifers whose dams were exposed to  THI of &lt;76, 76-83, and >83 three months before calving, respectively.</title>
   </caption>
   <graphic xlink:href="e0404_fig_1" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</fig>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Discussion</title>
				<p>The prevalence of fetal losses in the present study corresponds well with literature reports in hot environments (Pontes et al., 2015; Mellado et al., 2016), but it is much higher than the 4.8-9.8%% reported for Holstein heifers in temperate climates (Ettema &amp; Santos, 2004; Bach, 2011). This reproductive disorder was not affected by the exposure of dams to heat stress at parturition or various periodsbefore calving. The same was true for twining rate, dystocic parturition, and premature calves. Thus, there was no evidence of the negative effects of maternal heat stress on these periparturient disorders on offspring. Dystocia, premature deliveries, stillbirths, and abortions, are linked, in part, to endocrine changes in late pregnancy which impair pregnancies (Kindahl et al., 2002; Sandman et al., 2003); thus, these results do not support the view that in utero heat stress altered hormones related to calves delivery.</p><p>An important finding of this study was that in utero heat stress was associated with an increase in the AFC of heifers. This response seems to be linked to the fact that in utero heat-stressed calves are lighter at birth compared to non-heat stressed animals (Tao et al., 2012; Monteiro et al., 2014). Additionally, these lighter calves born from heat-stressed cows in late pregnancy do not have any compensatory growth before puberty, asthey remained smaller and lighter up to one year of age (Monteiro et al., 2016). Thus, heifers suffering heat stress in utero apparently do not achieve rapid growth rates due to reduced fetal secretion of insulin-like growth factor-I, prolactin, and insulin (Guo et al., 2016), which did not enable them to achieve breeding size earlier, lessening AFC which increases costs of raising replacement heifers (Davis Rincker et al., 2011).</p><p>Overall, first-service pregnancy rate was very low in f irst-calf Holstein heifers (10.9%) in this hot environment, but is in line with values observed in dairy operations in this hot environment (Flores et al., 2019). In temperate and tropical zones the percentage success at first service in dairy cattle has ranged between 26.7% and 49.6% in previous studies (Tillard et al., 2008; Fodor et al., 2018), which is much higher than the figure found in the present study, even when careful attention was given to reproductive management. This poor response is due to chronic heat stress suffered by cows in this zone which causes impaired fertilization (Sartori et al., 2002; Moghaddam &amp; Karimi, 2009), oocyte quality (Hansen, 2009; Souza-Cácares et al., 2019), sperm viability and hampers embryonic development (Sakatani et al., 2015; Wolfenson &amp; Roth, 2019).</p><p>First-calf heifers born to cows with moderate (THI 76-83) and severe (THI &gt;83) heat stress, one, two or three months before calving and severe heat stress at calving consistently presented a marked reduction in pregnancy rate at first service. The rise of internal body temperature in high-milk yielding dairy cows subjected to heat stress (Wolfenson &amp; Roth, 2019) causes a hyperthermic uterine environment which seems to inf luence the phenotypic variation of offspring mediated by epigenetic modifications regulating gene expression (Skibiel et al., 2018). Thus, heat stress in late pregnant Holstein cows seems to produce indirect developmental and post-natal effects in bovine offspring, adversely impacting reproduction function as evidenced by a noticeable reduction in pregnancy rate at first service. Reports suggest that epigenetic mechanisms are the link between early-life environment and fitness later in life (Gabory et al., 2011; Jammes et al., 2011); however, the underlying mechanisms involved in the association between the uterine environment of developing fetuses and postnatal reproductive function remain unclear.</p><p>In general, regardless of THI in the last trimester of gestation, pregnancy rate to all services was reduced in f irst-calf heifers gestated under maternal conditions of heat stress compared to heifers gestated with no heat stress in late gestation. The associations between late gestational exposure to heat stress and subsequent heifer reproductive function are complex and have yet to be elucidated but could be attributed, in part, to the fact thatlate-gestation heat stress compromises placental growth due to reductions in secretion of progesterone and placental lactogen (Bell et al., 1989), which leads to fetal malnutrition, hypoxia, and fetal growth retardation (Tao &amp; Dahl, 2013). Additionally, heat stress during late gestation depresses cell proliferation in tissues, thereby reducing cell number and restricting tissue growth (Harding &amp; Johnson, 1995; Fowden et al., 1998). In utero heat stress also reduces immune function and alters systemic metabolism (Flouris et al., 2009; Tao et al., 2012). Thus, in utero acute heat-stressed calves probably presented alterations in their reproductive organs which was reflected in lower reproductive capacity in adulthood. Insults during late gestation alter cell proliferation and program their morphology in postnatal life, which seems to contribute to the reduced reproductive performance of in utero heat-stressed heifers (Skibiel et al., 2018).</p><p>Services per pregnancy in the present study were extremely high (4.6 ± 3.4; Table 4). This value was far higher than the 2.7 services per conception in Holstein herds in southeastern United States (Norman et al., 2009), but is close to the mean number of services per pregnancy &gt; 6 (Flores et al., 2019) typical of dairy herds in this zone. To put this value into perspective, services per pregnancy for the whole herd (only pregnant cows) was 6.7 ± 3.4. High ambient temperature for the most of the year was responsible for the impaired reproduction in this dairy herd (Mellado et al., 2013). The present study provides no clear evidence that services per pregnancies were reduced in first-calf heifers gestated under maternal conditions of heat stress (THI &gt;83) compared to heifers born to dams not exposed to heat stress in late pregnancy. Therefore, measurement of ambient and humidity during late pregnancy in Holstein dams do not help to predict services per pregnancy in their first-calf offspring under the management and ambient conditions of the present study.</p><p>However, the calving-to-conception interval was longer in first-calf heifers gestated under maternal conditions of heat stress compared to heifers gestated with no heat stress the last trimester of pregnancy. It is worth mentioning that, the effect of in utero heat stress on calving-to-conception interval was not adjusted for milk yield and this variable could have an important impact on this variable. Given that animals in this dairy operation received adequate diets throughout lactation, deficient dietary protein or energy early in lactations were not responsible for this response. Intervals from calving to first ovulation neither seemed to be involved in this response as most first-calf heifers presented behavioral estrus repeatedly before getting pregnant. Thus, the greater struggle to become pregnant in first-calf heifers born to cows exposed to heat stress in late pregnancy apparently derive from induced structural and functionalchanges of the reproductive tract or disruption of the endocrine systems controlling the reproductive organs in the fetus that apparently persisted through adulthood (Skibiel et al., 2018), and possibly hindered the production of viable ovum, its fertilization and implantation in the uterus.</p><p>These data support the hypothesis that exposure of high-milk producing dairy cows to heat stress during the third trimester of pregnancy and at calving is negatively associated with reproductive function of their f irst-calf heifers, but the causes of this fertility depression are unclear. Thus, intervention strategies for minimizing the duration and degree of heat stress at the end of gestation could result in offspring with enhanced reproductive ability.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>References</title>
			<p>Ahmed BMS, Younas U, Asar TO, Dikmen S, Hansen PJ, Dahl GE, 2017. Cows exposed to heat stress during fetal life exhibit improved thermal tolerance. J Anim Sci 95: 3497-3503. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1298</p>

<p>Bach A, 2011. Associations between several aspects of heifer development and dairy cow survivability to second lactation. J Dairy Sci 94: 1052-1057. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3633</p>

<p>Bell AW, McBride BW, Slepetis R, Early RJ, Currie WB, 1989. Chronic heat stress and prenatal development in sheep: I. Conceptus growth and maternal plasma hormones and metabolites. J Anim Sci 67: 3289-3299. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.67123289x</p>

<p>Bohmanova J, Misztal I, Cole JB, 2007. Temperature-humidity indices as indicators of milk production losses due to heat stress. J Dairy Sci 90: 1947-1956. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-513</p>

<p>Davis Rincker LE, VandeHaar MJ, Wolf CA, Liesman JS, Chapin LT, Weber Nielsen MS, 2011. Effect of intensified feeding of heifer calves on growth, pubertal age, calving age, milk yield, and economics. J Dairy Sci 94: 3554-3567. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3923</p>

<p>Dikmen S, Hansen PJ, 2009. Is the temperature-humidity index the best indicator of heat stress in lactating dairy cows in a subtropical environment? J Dairy Sci 92: 109-116. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1370</p>

<p>Edmonson AJ, Lean IJ, Weaver LD, Farver T, Webster G, 1989. A body condition scoring chart for Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 72: 68-78. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79081-0</p>

<p>Ettema JF, Santos JEP, 2004. Impact of age at calving on lactation, reproduction, health, and income in first parity Holsteins on commercial farms. J Dairy Sci 87: 2730-2742. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73400-1</p>

<p>Flores J, García JE, Mellado J, Gaytán L, De Santiago A, Mellado M, 2019. Effect of growth hormone on milk yield and reproductive performance of subfertile Holstein cows during extended lactations. Span J Agric Res 17 (1): e0403. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2019171-13842</p>

<p>Flouris AD, Spiropoulos Y, Sakellariou GJ, Koutedakis Y, 2009. Effect of seasonal programming on fetal development and longevity: links with environmental temperature. Am J Human Biol 21: 214-216. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20818</p>

<p>Fodor I, Baumgartner W, Abonyi-Tóth Z, Lang Z, Ózsvári L, 2018. Associations between management practices and major reproductive parameters of Holstein-Friesian replacement heifers. Anim Reprod Sci 188: 114-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2017.11.015</p>

<p>Fowden AL, Li J, Forhead AJ, 1998. Glucocorticoids and the preparation for life after birth: are there long-term consequences of the life insurance? Proc Nutr Soc 57: 113-122. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19980017</p>

<p>Gabory A, Attig L, Junien C, 2011. Developmental programming and epigenetics. Am J Clin Nutr 94: 1943S-1952S. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.000927</p>

<p>Guo JR, Monteiro APA, Weng XS, Ahmed BM, Laporta J, Hayen MJ, Dahl GE, Bernard JK, Tao S, 2016. Short communication: Effect of maternal heat stress in late gestation on blood hormones and metabolites of newborn calves. J Dairy Sci 99: 6804-6807. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11088</p>

<p>Hansen PJ, 2009. Effects of heat stress on mammalian reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc London B. 364: 3341-3350. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0131</p>

<p>Harding JE, Johnson B, 1995. Nutrition and fetal growth. Reprod Fert Dev 7: 538-547. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD9950539</p>

<p>Jammes H, Junien C, Chavatte-Palmer P, 2011. Epigenetic control of development and expression of quantitative traits. Reprod Fertil Dev 23: 64-74. https://doi.org/10.1071/RD10259</p>

<p>Kaufman JD, Saxton AM, Ríus AG, 2018. Short communication: Relationships among temperature-humidity index with rectal, udder surface, and vaginal temperatures in lactating dairy cows experiencing heat stress. J Dairy Sci 101: 6424-6429. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13799</p>

<p>Kindahl H, Kornmatitsuk B, Königsson K, Gustafsson H, 2002. Endocrine changes in late bovine pregnancy with special emphasis on fetal well-being. Dom Anim Endocrinol 23: 321-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-7240(02)00167-4</p>

<p>Laporta J, Fabris TF, Skibiel AL, Powell JL, Hayen MJ, Horvath K, Miller-Cushon EK, Dahl GE, 2017. In utero exposure to heat stress during late gestation has prolonged effects on the activity patterns and growth of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 100: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11993</p>

<p>Mader TL, Davis MS, Brown-Brandl T, 2006. Environmental factors influencing heat stress in feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci 84: 712-719. https://doi.org/10.2527/2006.843712x</p>

<p>Mellado M, Sepulveda E, Meza-Herrera C, Veliz F, Arevalo J, Mellado J, De Santiago A, 2013. Effects of heat stress on reproductive efficiency of high yielding Holstein cows in a hot-arid environment. Rev Colomb Cienc Pec 26: 193-200.</p>

<p>Mellado M, López R, de Santiago A, Veliz FG, Macías-Cruz U, Avendaño-Reyes L, García JE, 2016. Climatic conditions, twining and frequency of milking as factors affecting the risk of fetal losses in high-yielding Holstein cows in a hot environment. Trop Anim Health Prod 48: 1247-1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1084-8</p>

<p>Moghaddam A, Karimi IP, 2009. Effects of short-term cooling on pregnancy rate of dairy heifers under summer heat stress. Vet Res Commun 33: 567-575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-009-9205-8</p>

<p>Monteiro APA, Tao S, Thompson IM, Dahl GE, 2014. Effect of heat stress during late gestation on immune function and growth performance of calves: Isolation of altered colostral and calf factors. J Dairy Sci 97: 6426-6439. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7891</p>

<p>Monteiro APA, Guo JR, Weng X, Ahmed BM, Hayen MJ, Dahl GE, Bernard JK, 2016. Effect of maternal heat stress during the dry period on growth and metabolism of calves. J Dairy Sci 99: 3896-3907. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10699</p>

<p>Norman HD, Wright JR, Hubbard SM, Miller RH, Hutchison JL, 2009. Reproductive status of Holstein and Jersey cows in the United States. J Dairy Sci 92: 3517-3528. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1768</p>

<p>NRC, 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, 7th rev. ed. National Research Council, National Academic Science, Washington, DC, USA.</p>

<p>Pontes GCS, Monteiro PLJ, Prata AB, Guardieiro MM, Pinto DAM, Fernandes GO, Wiltbank MC, Santos JE Sartori R, 2015. Effect of injectable vitamin E on incidence of retained fetal membranes and reproductive performance of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 98: 2437-2449. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2014-8886</p>

<p>Sakatani M, Yamanaka K, Balboula AZ, Takenouchi N, Takahashi M, 2015. Heat stress during in vitro fertilization decreases fertilization success by disrupting anti-polyspermy systems of the oocytes. Mol Reprod Dev 82: 36-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22441</p>

<p>Sandman CA, Glynn L, Wadhwa PD, Chicz-DeMet A, Porto M, Garite T, 2003. Maternal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal dysregulation during the third trimester influences human fetal responses. Dev Neurosci 25: 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1159/000071467</p>

<p>Sartori R, Rosa GJ, Wiltbank MC, 2002. Ovarian structures and circulating steroid in heifers and lactating cows in summer and lactating and dry cows in winter. J Dairy Sci 85: 2813-2822. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74368-3</p>

<p>Skibiel AL, Peñagaricano F, Amorín R, Ahmed BM, Dahl GE, Laporta J, 2018. In utero heat stress alters the offspring epigenome. Sci Rep 8 (1): 14609. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32975-1</p>

<p>Souza-Cácares MB, Fialho ALL, Silva WAL, Cardoso CJT, Pöhland R, Martins MIM, Melo-Sterza FA, 2019. Oocyte quality and heat shock proteins in oocytes from bovine breeds adapted to the tropics under different conditions of environmental thermal stress. Theriogenology 130: 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.02.039</p>

<p>Tao S, Dahl GE, 2013. Invited review: Heat stress effects during late gestation on dry cows and their calves. J Dairy Sci 96: 4079-4093. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6278</p>

<p>Tao S, Monteiro APA, Thompson IM, Hayen MJ, Dahl GE, 2012. Effect of late-gestation maternal heat stress on growth and immune function of dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 95: 7128-7136. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5697</p>

<p>Tillard E, Humblot P, Faye B, Lecomte P, Dohoo I, Bocquier F, 2008. Postcalving factors affecting conception risk in Holstein dairy cows in tropical and subtropical conditions. Theriogenology 69: 443-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.10.014</p>

<p>Wolfenson D, Roth Z, 2019. Impact of heat stress on cow reproduction and fertility. Anim Front 9: 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/af/vfy027
</p>	
			</sec></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p></p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>