<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">e0601</journal-id>
      <journal-title>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub"> 2171-9292</issn><issn pub-type="epub"> 2171-9292</issn><publisher>
      	<publisher-name>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021191-16870</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group><subject>food quality</subject><subject>poultry meat</subject><subject>carcass yield</subject><subject>free-range cockerel</subject><subject>local breed</subject><subject>nutritional quality</subject></subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Effect of finishing diet on carcass characteristics and meat quality of Mos cockerel</article-title><subtitle>Effect of finishing diet on carcass characteristics and meat quality of Mos cockerel</subtitle></title-group>
      <contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Vargas-Ramella</surname>
		<given-names>Márcio</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Márcio Vargas-Ramella  Centro de Educação Superior da Região Sul - CERES da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Laguna, Santa Catarina 88.790-000, Brazil  Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia Nº 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Lorenzo</surname>
		<given-names>José M.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia Nº 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain  Area de Tecnologia de los Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias de Ourense, Universidad de Vigo, 32004 Ourense, Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Rois</surname>
		<given-names>Diego</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Federacion de Razas Autóctonas de Galicia (BOAGA), Pazo de Fontefiz, 32152 Coles (Ourense), Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Arias</surname>
		<given-names>Anisia</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Federacion de Razas Autóctonas de Galicia (BOAGA), Pazo de Fontefiz, 32152 Coles (Ourense), Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Justo</surname>
		<given-names>José R.</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Federacion de Razas Autóctonas de Galicia (BOAGA), Pazo de Fontefiz, 32152 Coles (Ourense), Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Pateiro</surname>
		<given-names>Mirian</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia Nº 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>López-Pedrouso</surname>
		<given-names>María</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>University of Santiago de Compostela, Dept. Zoology, Genetics and Physical Anthropology, 15872 Santiago de Compostela, Spain</aff>
	</contrib><contrib contrib-type="author">
	<name name-style="western">
	<surname>Franco</surname>
		<given-names>Daniel</given-names>
	</name>
	<aff>Centro Tecnológico de la Carne de Galicia, Rúa Galicia Nº 4, Parque Tecnológico de Galicia, San Cibrao das Viñas, 32900 Ourense, Spain</aff>
	</contrib></contrib-group>		
      <pub-date pub-type="ppub">
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>10</day>
        <month>03</month>
        <year>2021</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>© 2021 Copyright © 2020 INIA.  This  is an  open  access  article  distributed  under  the  terms  of the  Creative  Commons  Attribution  4.0 International (CC-by 4.0) License.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
        <license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</p></license>
      </permissions>
      <related-article related-article-type="companion" vol="2" page="e235" id="RA1" ext-link-type="pmc">
			<article-title>Effect of finishing diet on carcass characteristics and meat quality of Mos cockerel</article-title>
      </related-article>
	  <abstract abstract-type="toc">
		<p>
			Aim of study: To evaluate the effect of different diets on carcass characteristics and meat quality from Mos free-ranged cockerel.  Area of study: Galicia (NW Spain).  Material and methods: Cockerels (n=75) were allocated to 3 groups (n=25) according to finishing diets: commercial fodder (CF), 50% wheat and 50% corn (WH) and 33% wheat and 66% corn (CR). Meat quality was assessed in terms of physicochemical, and nutritional features.  Main results: The highest live and carcass weight were obtained in CF group. Meat from CF and CR groups were similar in moisture, protein and cholesterol content in drumstick cut, meanwhile in breast piece there were no significant differences (p>0.05) in intramuscular fat (IMF), ash, and lightness (L*). On the other hand, finishing diet affected L* and redness (a*) values, showing the highest L* values in meat samples from CF treatment (49.94 for drumstick) (p&lt;0.01), whereas a* was superior in WH samples (11.30 and 4.61, for drumstick and breast, respectively) (p&lt;0.001). Meat shear force test was not affected (p>0.05) by diets. Finally, the finishing feed affected (p&lt;0.05) the fatty acid and amino acid profile in both cuts (drumstick and breast).  Research highlights: Present study allowed to characterize for the first time Mos cockerels fed with different diets. Some carcass features obtained were higher than previous studies with other Mos categories, and some autochthonous and industrial breeds. Meat from cockerels was characterized by a high protein percentage and lower IMF.
		</p>
		</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body><sec>
			<title>Introduction</title>
				<p >The global food system has the challenge of feeding the population with rising demand for food minimizing its environmental impacts (FAO, 2010a). For that, this requires more efficient animal production systems and indigenous breeds to optimize the use of natural resources. Moreover, sustainable production may require more land to obtain the same yields as conventional farms, hence studies with local breeds will be necessary to know its performance and promote their production (Seufert et al., 2012).</p><p >Intensive industry of poultry meat uses industrial lines (hybrids), which reduce biodiversity and preservation of local breeds (Hoffmann, 2009). On the contrary, indigenous chickens can be a source of genes for breeding programs, to benefit local livestock farmers (De Marchi et al., 2006). To promote the raise of indigenous chickens, on a large scale, it is necessary information on the carcass characteristics and meat quality to cover this specific niche market (Dyubele et al., 2010). Moreover, the characteristics of raising methods commonly used for slow-grown chickens allow breeders to satisfy the consumer demands linked to terms such as organic, animal welfare and outdoor poultry.</p><p >Mos chicken is a native breed of Galicia (Spain) resistant to diseases that tends naturally to live in freedom (MAPA, 2020). In addition, Mos zootechnics characteristics are perfectly fitted to commercialization standards for poultry meat in Europe relative to chickens as “open-air farm” or “free-range” according to Commission Regulation CE nº 543/2008 (OJEU, 2008), that must be carried out with a slow-growing genotype and slaughter age never lower than 81 days. Carcass characteristics and meat quality depend on many factors, such as genotype, nutrition and housing system (Puchała et al., 2015), but genotype may be the most important. Specifically, in carcass performance, previous studies have indicated higher percentages for noble cuts (drumstick, thigh and wing) in Mos breed than in commercial genotypes (Sasso T-44), both in roosters (Franco et al., 2012a) and young hens (Pateiro et al., 2018). In the same line, concerning meat composition and considering breed effect, Mos roosters show higher levels of polyunsaturated fatty acids (FA) than Sasso T-44 hybrid line (Franco et al., 2012b).</p><p >In Galicia (NW Spain), small-medium exploitations produce a category of chicken classified as a free-range cockerel, an immature male chicken raised in a free-range system and fed with different finishing diets based on feed produced on the farms. This poultry meat is placed between broiler and rooster/capon meat, occupying an empty market niche. In the last years, studies with Mos breed have been published to evaluate carcass yield, meat quality (physicochemical, nutritional and sensorial) according to several factors such as slaughter age, finishing diets, gender or caponization effect (e.g. entire roosters, capons or young hens) (Franco et al., 2012a, 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018) but there is no information about free-range cockerel meat quality.</p><p >Local breeds have particular sensory and nutritional values in comparison with industrial lines, but many of these features need further studies to elucidate factors that influence these parameters (Jayasena et al., 2013). Overall, free-range cockerel can offer cost-effective meat of a local breed, since it can be slaughtered at younger ages than other categories (&lt; 18 weeks) with higher meat quality but are necessary studies to confirm it. Therefore, this research aimed to characterize the carcass characteristics and meat quality (breast and drumstick) of Mos free-ranged cockerel fed with three different finishing diets: commercial fodder and two combinations of wheat and corn at different levels.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Material and methods</title>
				<p >Experimental design and sample collection</p><p >A total of 75 cockerels were used in this study. Birds were allocated to 3 groups (n=25) according to finishing diets, as following: commercial fodder (CF), 50% wheat and 50% corn (WH) and 33% wheat and 66% corn (CR). Table 1 shows the determined chemical composition of CF and cereals (corn and wheat) used. Cockerels were reared under extensive indoor (barn-reared) conditions according to the Commission Regulation nº 543/2008 (EC, 2008). From birth to the fourth week, birds were housed in a pen provided with central aisles, several floors, and natural ventilation with a density of 12 birds/m2. At the sixth week of life, birds were sexed and moved to the definitive poultry house, remaining until slaughter, with a density of 4 and 6 birds/m2 (interior and exterior of the pen, respectively). As a heat source, heaters of 250 W heating power at the ratio of 1 per 40 chicks were used. Heaters were partially removed at 4 weeks and completely after 6 weeks. Up to the fourth week of life, birds were fed ad libitum with a starter fodder (21% protein and 3,000 kcal of metabolizable energy (ME)/kg), afterwards until to 8 weeks with a growth standard fodder (19% protein and 2,900 kcal ME/ kg). Finishing diets were provided in the last 2 weeks before slaughter. Birds were slaughtered in an accredited abattoir by manual exsanguination, and then plucked and eviscerated. Afterwards, carcasses were refrigerated for 24 h at 4°C and carcass weight, dressing percentage, and main commercial cuts were determined. From the refrigerated carcasses, the head, neck, legs, edible viscera (heart, liver, gizzard) and fat (perivisceral, perineal, and abdominal) were removed to obtain the main valuable commercial cuts (drumstick, thigh, wing, and breast). Drumstick (peroneous longus) and breast (pectoralis major) were used for pH, chemical composition, nutritional value, colour parameters and sensory analysis, meanwhile, the water-holding capacity measured by cooking loss (CL) and textural traits were assessed only in breast samples.</p><p >pH, chemical composition and colour</p><p >The pH was measured with a digital portable pH-meter (Hanna Instruments, Eibar, Spain) equipped with a penetration probe. A portable colorimeter (Konica Minolta CM600d, Osaka, Japan) with the next settings machine (pulsed xenon arc lamp, angle of 0° viewing angle geometry, standard illuminant D65 and aperture size of 8 mm) was used to evaluate meat colour in the CIELAB space (CIE, 1976). Moisture, protein and ash were quantified according to the ISO recommended standards 1442:1997, 937:1978 and 936:1998, respectively (ISO 937, 1978; ISO 1442, 1997; ISO 936, 1998). The intramuscular fat (IMF) was extracted according to the AOCS Official Procedure Am 5-04 (AOCS, 2005). For total cholesterol determination, the saponification, extraction, and simultaneous identifica-tion of cholesterol in meat were performed in normal pha-se following the procedure described by Domínguez et al. (2018). The HPLC system used was an Alliance 2695 mo-del equipped with a 2475 scanning fluorescence detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Empower 2 advanced sof-tware (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used to control the system operation and results management.</p><p ><bold>Table 1.</bold>Chemical composition and fatty acid profile of commercial fodder and ingre-dients used for finishing diets formulation</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_1.png"/></fig>SFA: ∑saturated fatty acids (C16:0 + C18:0 + C20:0). MUFA: ∑monounsaturated fatty acids (C18:1n7 + C18:1n9 + C20:1). PUFA: ∑polyunsaturated fatty acids (C18:2n6 + C18:3n3+ C18:3n6).</p><p >Water holding capacity, and texture analysis</p><p >Water holding capacity and texture traits (Warner- Bratzler test-WB and Texture Profile Analysis test-TPA) were performed following the procedures described by Pateiro et al. (2013). The water holding capacity was me-asured as CL. Briefly, breast cuts were cooked placing it into vacuum-packaged bags in a water bath with automa-tic temperature control (JP Selecta, Precisdg, Barcelona, Spain) until they reached an internal temperature of 70°C, controlled by thermocouples type K (Comark, PK23M, UK) connected to a data logger (Comark Dilligence EVG, N3014, UK). After cooking, breast samples were cooled in a circulatory water bath set at 18°C for 30 min, and the CL percentage was recorded by measuring the weight difference between the cooked and raw samples.</p><p >To carry out WB test all samples were cut perpendi-cular to the muscle fibre direction at a crosshead speed of 3.33 mm/s in a texture analyzer (TA.XT.plus of Stable Micro Systems, Vienna Court, UK). Three meat pieces of 1 × 1 × 2.5 cm (height × width × length) were removed parallel to the muscle fibre direction and they were com-pletely cut using a WB shear blade with a triangular slot cutting edge (1 mm of thickness). Three pieces of meat of 1 × 1 × 1 cm (height × width × length) parallel to the muscle fibre direction were removed for TPA test. Tex-tural parameters were measured by compressing to 80% with a probe of 19.85 cm2 of surface contact. Between the first and second compression, the probe waited for 2 seconds. Hardness, cohesiveness, springiness, gummi-ness and chewiness were obtained.</p><p >Analysis of fatty acid and amino acids</p><p >Before analysis, IMF was extracted from 5 g of ground meat. Lipid extracts were evaporated to dryness under va-cuum at 56 °C and stored at −80 °C until analysis of FA methyl esters. FA identification was carried out with gas chromatography with flame ionization detector, according to Domínguez et al. (2015b). Briefly, separation and quan-tification of the FA methyl esters were carried out using gas chromatography equipment (Agilent 6890N, Agilent Tech-nologies Spain, S.L., Madrid, Spain) endowed with a flame ionization detector and an automatic sample injector HP 7683, and using a Supelco SPTM-2560 fused silica capillary column (100 m, 0.25-mm i.d., 0.2-μm film thickness; Supel-co Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA). Nonanoic acid methyl ester (C9:0) at 0.3 mg/mL was used as an internal standard. Indi-vidual FA methyl esters were identified by comparing their retention times with those of authenticated standards. The FA were expressed as a percentage of total FA identified.</p><p >For amino acid (AA) determination, the hydrolysis of the protein, derivatization, and identification of hydroly-sed AA was carried out following the procedure described by Domínguez et al. (2015a). The HPLC system used was an Alliance 2695 model equipped with a 2475 scanning fluorescence detector (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). Em-power 2 advanced software (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) was used to control the system operation and results ma-nagement. Data regarding AA composition were expres-sed in g/100 g of protein.</p><p >Statistical analysis</p><p >For the statistical analysis of the results of carcass and meat quality, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using the SPSS package (SPSS 23.0, Chicago, IL) was performed for all variables considered in the study. Normal distri-bution and homogeneity of variance were previously tes-ted (Shapiro-Wilk). Duncan`s test was used to separate least-square means with a significance level of p&lt;0.05.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Results</title>
				<p >Effect of diet type on carcass features</p><p >The carcass characteristics of cockerels are shown in Table 2. Feeding system did not affect dressing percentage, drumstick percentage, drumstick bone, thigh percentage, leg percentage, and meat/bone drumstick ra-tio. The highest live and carcass weight were obtained in CF group and the lowest in WH group, but on the contrary cockerels from WH treatment showed the highest value for breast percentage, with respect to carcass weight. The CF and WH groups were the most different in carcass pa-rameters and only carcass percentage, thigh and head per-centage were similar (p&lt;0.05).</p><p ><bold>Table 2.</bold>Effect of finishing diet on carcass yield and proportion of commercial cuts of carcass of the cockerels slaughtered at 18 weeks<fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_2.png"/></fig>[1]M/B: meat/bone drumstick.[2]Treatments: CF: commercial fodder; WH: 50% wheat and 50% corn; and CR: 33% wheat and 66% corn.[3]SEM: standard error of the mean.a-cMeans of the same row with different letters differ significantly by the Duncan’s test (p&lt;0.05).</p><p >Effect of diet type on chemical composition, colour and textural parameters</p><p >The mean values of the colour parameters and che-mical composition (drumstick and breast samples) are shown in Table 3. For both muscles, there were signi-ficant differences by diet effect, except for yellowness (b*) of meat. The highest pH value (6.22) was reached in drumstick cuts from CF group. Meat from CF and CR groups were similar in moisture, protein and choleste-rol content in drumstick cut, meanwhile in breast piece, there were no significant differences (p&lt;0.05) in IMF, ash, and lightness (L*). The finishing diet affected L* and a*, showing the highest values for L* in meat sam-ples of cockerels finished with CF treatment (49.94 for drumstick) (p&lt;0.01), meanwhile meat a* was superior in WH samples (11.30 and 4.61, for drumstick and breast, respectively) in comparison with CF samples which pre-sented the lowest a* values.</p><p >Water holding capacity and textural parameters of WB and TPA-test are presented in Table 4. Meat from cockerels of CR group showed a significantly higher percentage of CL than those from the other ones (13.37, 11.82 and 11.44% for CR, WH and CF groups, respectively; p&lt;0.05). Regarding WB test, shear force was not affected by diet effect, meanwhile all TPA para-meters of meat samples were affected by finishing diet (Table 4).</p><p >Effect of diet type on fatty acid profile</p><p >The FA profile of drumstick and breast is shown in Table 5. The finishing feed affected the FA profile in both cuts. In drumstick cut, the predominant fraction was the saturated FA (SFA), followed by polyunsaturated FA (PUFA), and monounsaturated FA (MUFA), with values that ranged between 35.51% and 36.73%. On the con-trary, in breast PUFA was the most abundant (PUFA&gt;S-FA&gt;MUFA), except for CF dietary treatment (SFA&gt;PU-FA&gt;MUFA), with percentages between 34.54% and 38%. In breast, the CF treatment influenced significantly (p&lt;0.05) MUFA, PUFA, and n6. MUFA content was the minority fraction in both pieces. Within SFA, for both cuts and all diet treatments, palmitic (C16:0) and stearic (C18:0) acids were the most abundant. It should be noted that the use of CF significantly increased palmitic acid content and consequently the nutritional atherogenic in-dex (AI) and thrombogenic index (TI) indices in both cuts. On the other hand, the inclusion of corn and wheat in the diet (WH and CR treatments) significantly decrea-sed SFA, except for breast samples from CR group, and increased PUFA/SFA ratio in both cuts. In relation to the AI and TI, the highest ratios were observed in drumstick and breast samples from CF diet. Concerning hypocho-lesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic ratio (h/H), in both cuts WH showed the highest indices, meanwhile breast from CR group presented the highest nutritional value among all samples.</p><p ><bold>Table 3.</bold>Effect of finishing diets on chemical composition and color parameters of drumstick and breast of the cockerels slaughtered at 18 weeks</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_3.png"/></fig>[1]CF: commercial fodder; WH: 50% wheat and 50% corn and CR: 33% wheat and 66% corn.[2]SEM: standard error of the mean.a-cMeans of the same row with different letters differ significantly by the Duncan’s test (p&lt;0.05). n.d.: not detected.</p><p ><bold>Table 4.</bold>Effect of finishing diets on cooking loss and textural parameters of the cockerels slaughtered at 18 weeks</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_4.png"/></fig>[1]TPA-test: texture profile analysis.[2]CF: commercial fodder; WH: 50% wheat and 50% corn and CR: 33% wheat and 66% corn.[3]SEM: standard error of the mean.a-cMeans of the same row with different letters differ signi-ficantly by the Duncan’s test (p&lt;0.05).</p><p ><bold>Table 5.</bold>Effect of finishing diet on fatty acid profile (g/100 g of fat) of drumstick and breast of the cockerels slaughtered at 18 weeks</p><p ><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_5.png"/></fig>[1]SFA = ∑(C14:0 + C15:0 + C16:0 + C17:0 + C18:0 + C22:0); MUFA = ∑(C16:1 + C18:1n7 + C18:1n9 + C20:1); PUFA = ∑(C18:2n6 + C18:3n3 + C20:2n6 + C20:3n6 + C20:4n6 + C20:5n3 + C22:5n3 + C22:6n3). AI: atherogenic index. TI: thrombogenic index. h/H: ratio hypocholesterolemic/hypercholesterolemic fatty acids. NV: nutritional value. n6/n3: ratio between the sum of n6 and n3 fatty acids.[2]CF: commercial fodder; WH: 50% wheat and 50% corn and CR: 33% wheat and 66% corn.[3]SEM: standard error of the mean.a-cMeans of the same row with different letters differ significantly by the Duncan’s test (p&lt;0.05).</p><p >Effect of diet type on amino acid profile</p><p >The AA profile of drumstick and breast is shown in Table 6. Arginine and methionine were the only ones not affected (p&gt;0.05) by dietary treatment in both cuts. Samples of drumstick from WH group showed the highest cysteine, tyrosine, valine, isoleucine, leucine and phenylalanine amounts. On the contrary, in breast samples, this pattern was not maintained, and the highest AA contents, except for tyrosine and phenylalanine, were found in breasts from CF and CR groups. Breast samples from CF group had significant (p&lt;0.05) higher aspartic, proline, cysteine, threonine, isoleucine, and leucine amount than the other ones, meanwhile CR group displayed the higher serine, glutamic, glycine and total non-essential AA levels.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>Discussion</title>
				<p >Effect of diet type on carcass features</p><p >Live and carcass weight varied from 2.75 to 3.33 kg and from 2.10 to 2.51 kg, respectively. These intervals were higher than those observed in Mos hens slaughtered at 20 weeks (2.05-2.30 kg and 1.56-1.80 kg for live and carcass weight, respectively) (Pateiro et al., 2018). Despite the differences of two weeks in the slaughter, results could be due to the gender effect for the same breed. On the other hand, commercial breeds had higher live and carcass weights (Díaz et al., 2013b). In this way, the aforementioned authors reported that Sasso X-44 hens showed slightly higher values for live and carcass weight than Mos hens (Pateiro et al., 2018).</p><p >As expected, carcass weight of the heaviest cockerels (2.51 kg for CF group) was lower than those reported for Mos rooster slaughtered at 6 months (2.70 kg) (Franco et al., 2012a), or for other Spanish (2.60 kg, Extremeña Azul) and Portuguese (2.80 kg, Amarela, Preta Lusitânica, and Pedrês) breeds slaughtered at 8 months (Muriel Duran, 2014; Soares et al., 2015). However, other indigenous breeds from Italy and Spain slaughtered at 7 months, reached lower live and carcass weight, but similar dressing percentage (Miguel et al., 2008; Cassandro et al., 2015), indicating that genotype has a key role in growth performance. Comparing with other local breeds slaughtered at similar age (4 months), our results for carcass weight and dressing percentage were higher than those obtained in Black-Boned (1.10 kg and 63.7%), Thai Native (1.28 kg and 65.9%), Bresse (1.52 kg and 63.6%), and Rhode Island Red (1.58 kg and 64.4%) breeds.</p><p >Regarding cuts with high commercial value (drumstick, thigh, wing, and breast), the percentage total achieved was 62.2%. Previous studies reported that Mos breed provided a high yield of noble parts, which would satisfy the industry and consumer demands (Pateiro et al., 2018).</p><p >This value was greater than those obtained for Mos roosters slaughtered at 6 months (59.89%), 7 months (59.27%), 8 months (57.7%) and 10 months (58.17%) (Sánchez et al., 2005; Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016). Moreover, it was also higher than those showed in other Spanish local breeds of slow growth such as Castellana Negra slaughtered at 7 months or Extremeña Azul slaughtered at 8 months (Miguel et al., 2008; Muriel Duran, 2014), as well as for industrial lines such as Sasso T-44 (56.01%) and Sasso X-44 (55.57%) (Franco et al., 2012a, 2016). On the contrary, Soares et al. (2015), working with Amarela, Preta Lusitânica, and Pedrês Portuguesa breeds slaughtered at 8 months, reported higher percentages of breast, thigh, and drumstick than those obtained in the present study. This suggests that allometric growth values of theses commercial cuts has relation with maturity state, proving that Mos cockerels can provide a high yield of noble parts at earlier ages.</p><p >Effect of diet type on chemical composition, colour and textural parameters</p><p >Overall, the pH values in poultry meat could be a consequence of their age, rearing management, pre-slaughter practices (resting period) or intrinsic behavior typical of indigenous breeds (Jaturasitha et al., 2008). In the present study, the mean values for pH ranged between 5.79 and 6.22 for both muscles (breast and drumstick, respectively) and all dietary treatments. This pH interval was previously reported in the literature for different birds (hens, cocks, and capons). Moreover, in agreement with the results found by other authors, these values are usually higher in drumstick cut (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016; Díaz et al., 2013a,b; Pateiro et al., 2018). Unlike other authors, significant differences were found among treatments (Franco et al., 2012a), with values that were higher than those obtained for other animals fed with cereals (Díaz et al., 2013b).</p><p >Regarding chemical composition, the most interesting finding to emerge from the data is the high protein percentage obtained in the breast. Meat from cockerels showed higher protein percentages (1.5-3%) compared to previous studies with Mos roosters and hens (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018), and other breeds (Black-Boned, Thai, Polverara, Bresse, Rhode) (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Díaz et al., 2013b; Dalle Zotte et al., 2020). Similar breast protein percentages were observed working with Castellana Negra (cocks and capons) and Taiwan native chicken (Miguel et al., 2008; Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015).</p><p >The IMF content found in Mos drumstick varied between 0.85 and 1.27%, which is lower than those previously reported to Mos hens, roosters, and capons (Franco et al., 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018). Comparing to hybrids, IMF of Mos drumstick was far lower, at least twice, than capons of Sasso T-44 slow-growing line and Sasso X-44 (Díaz et al., 2013a,b; Franco et al., 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018), and analogous comparing to CP707 broiler (Wa-ttanachant et al., 2004). In contrast, higher values were observed in Sasso T-44 rooster (Franco et al. 2012, 2013). Considering breast samples, our results are in accordance with previous studies of Mos hens, roosters, and capons (Franco et al., 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018). However, coc-kerel values were lower than those (0.07-0.19% vs. 0.45-0.7%, respectively) reported in Black-Boned, Thai, Pol-verara, Bresse, and Rhode Island Red breeds (Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Dalle Zotte et al., 2020). Higher values (ave-rage value of 1.3%) were also found in Castellana Negra and commercial hybrids (Miguel et al., 2008; Dalle Zotte et al., 2020). On the other hand, our IMF values were hi-gher than Mos roosters (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013).</p><p >The average cholesterol value of 62.44 mg/100g in drumstick cut was slightly higher than those previous-ly reported in Mos roosters (58 mg/100 g), other native breeds such as Thai and Black-boned (53.9 mg/100 g and 58.70 mg/100 g), and hybrid lines like Sasso T-44 (55.00 mg/100 g) or Sasso X-44 (60.00 mg/100 g) (Ja-turasitha et al., 2008; 2012; Franco et al., 2016). On the contrary, our values were lower than those shown in other studies with Mos roosters (65.00 mg/100 g), Bresse (67.20 mg/100 g) or Rhode Island genotype (83.3 mg/100 g) (Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Franco et al., 2012a, 2016).</p><p >In terms of human health and considering the referen-ce value of 300 mg (USDA, 2015), one hundred-gram of drumstick from cockerel will represent approximate-ly 21% of daily cholesterol intake. Our results indicate that dietary treatment modified the cholesterol contents of cockerels, observing the lowest values of 57.58 mg/100 g in the CF group. Our findings might be due to meta-bolic processes, as the genes that control endogenous cholesterol synthesis, which even with high levels of fat in the diet can generate low levels of cholesterol in meat or vice versa.</p><p >The dietary treatment affected meat colour in agree-ment with previous studies (Franco et al., 2012a; Díaz et al., 2013b; Pateiro et al., 2018). In general, poultry meat from indigenous breeds has greater a* values (Díaz et al., 2013b), but redder meat can be explained for several factors like pH (higher muscle pH is associated with darker meat), muscle location and age (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015; Kim et al., 2020).</p><p >Overall, it can be observed that the inclusion of corn in the diet decreased L* values and increased a*; however, these data must be interpreted with caution because the effect of cereals in meat colour is not clear since meat myoglobin content is the main factor that contributes to meat colour (Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015; Kim et al., 2020). For breast cut, it should be noted the important and significance differences in breast a* among feeding groups (1.16, 3.33 and 4.61 for CF, CR and WH groups, respectively). Our findings are in agreement with Franco et al. (2012b) and Chumngoen &amp; Tan (2015), who found differences in a* index caused by feeding treatment. Within drumstick, our results are in disagreement with those found by other authors, who did not find significant differences among feeding treatments (Díaz et al., 2013b). Except for L*, a* and b* values were higher than those obtained for the aforementioned authors. On the contrary, Lyon et al. (2004) reported that b* index was the value more influenced by diets with corn, observing that corn-based diets displayed significantly higher b* values than those obtained in wheat-based diets.</p><p >The water loss that occurs during cooking has a substantial influence on the purchase decisions of consumers since affects important parameters as appearance, color tenderness and juiciness. CL results were higher than those reported previously by other authors (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013; Pateiro et al., 2018), who obtained average values of 9% in Mos roosters and hens. However, in other studies with Mos roosters higher mean values have been observed (Sánchez et al., 2005; Franco et al., 2013), indicating that slaughter age and rearing conditions have a strong influence on CL. Sasso capons, Padovana Camosciata, Berlanda-Gaina, Taiwan Native Chicken and CP707 broiler have also displayed higher values (16-19%) (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Díaz et al., 2013a,b; Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015; Cassandro et al., 2015). Even higher CL (22-23%) were registered for Thai, Black-Boned, Bresse, and Rhode Island Red (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008). The literature reported a wide range of temperatures (70-80 ºC) and times (until 60 minutes) in the cooking procedure, which could explain these differences among studies. Therefore, CL depends on time and temperature during the cooking process, because protein denaturation led to the loss of CL reducing juiciness and changing the consistency of the meat (Wang et al., 2009; Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015).</p><p >Some textural parameters were significantly affected by finishing feeding, in agreement with the findings found in other studies with Mos young hens (Pateiro et al., 2018). In this study changes in hardness, gumminess, and chewiness were detected. The same behavior was also found by Lyon et al. (2004), who noticed that meat from broilers fed corn required significantly less shear force than animals fed wheat. The values found by the aforementioned authors were slightly higher than those found in the present study (17.83 vs. 13.79 N/cm2 and 21.46 vs. 15.50 N/cm2 for corn and wheat feedings, respectively). On the contrary, studies conducted with capons fed cereals (mixtures of corn and wheat, or corn and barley) did not show changes in textural parameters (Díaz et al., 2013b).</p><p >Our values for shear force were slightly lower than those reported by Franco et al. (2016) in capons and roosters slaughtered at 8 months, while TPA parameters were similar. The mean values obtained for shear force agrees with those values reported by Cassandro et al. (2015) in Padovana Camosciata and Berlanda-Gaina breeds but they were lower than those (7.64 vs.14.12 N/cm2 for broilers and Mos cockerels, respectively) found by Wattanachant et al. (2004). In addition, higher values than those presented in our study have been reported in Taiwan &amp; Thai breeds (23.52 and 40.08 N, respectively) (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Chumngoen &amp; Tan, 2015). These differences found for texture could be related to fed, slaughter age, genotype and collagen composition. In this sense, several authors have suggested an interaction effect between genotype and slaughter age to explain differences in meat texture. Indeed, Wattanachant et al. (2004) and Chumngoen &amp; Tan (2015) reported that older indigenous chickens had more total and cross-linked collagen and consequently less-soluble collagen than younger broilers, suggesting that differences in meat texture could be attributed to these variations in collagen composition</p><p ><bold>Table 6.</bold>Effect of finishing diet on amino acid profile (% respect to protein) of drumstick and breast of the cockerels slaughtered at 18 weeks</p><fig><label>Figure</label><graphic xlink:href="e0601_tab_6.png"/></fig><p >[1]E = essential amino acid; and NE = nonessential amino acid.[2]CF: commercial fodder; WH: 50% wheat and 50% corn and CR: 33% wheat and 66% corn.[3]SEM is the standard error of the mean.a-cMeans of the same row with different letters differ significantly by the Duncan’s test (p&lt;0.05).</p><p >Effect of diet type on fatty acid (FA) profile</p><p >The results obtained confirmed that one of the main factors influencing the FA composition of poultry meat is the diet of the animals (Geldenhuys et al., 2015). In the present study, correlating to previous works with Mos, cockerels showed SFA contents (35.51-36.73) less abundant than roosters (Franco et al., 2013), while SFA contents were very similar in roosters and hens (Franco et al., 2012a; Pateiro et al., 2018). Comparing these values with those found in other breeds, Mos cockerels reached SFA less abundant than Thai, Black-Boned, Bresse and Rhode Island Red, Padovana Camosciata, and Berlanda-Gaina (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Cassandro et al., 2015).</p><p >Regarding unsaturated FA (UFA), Mos cockerels presented lower levels of MUFAs (30.55-31.18) than Mos hens and roosters (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013; Pateiro et al., 2018). Moreover, the values were similar to those found in Mos roosters (Franco et al., 2016). On the contrary, PUFAs contents (32.08-33.64) were higher than those obtained in Mos roosters and hens (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018). In addition, the aforementioned local breeds presented similar values for UFA than Mos cockerels (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Cassandro et al., 2015). With respect to nutritional ratios, the values obtained for n6/n3 (9.5210.21) were lower than those obtained in Mos roosters (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016), but similar to Mos hens (Pateiro et al., 2018).</p><p >These healthful patterns in meat composition of indigenous chickens could be observed even if broilers and native breeds were fed with the same diet because their feeding behavior more selectively than industrial lines (Wattanachant et al., 2004). Although PUFA incorporation into muscle and their meat content depends on a mechanism attributed to elongation/denaturation, this it is more efficient in native breeds (Pateiro et al., 2018). Further, considering groups of FA, the amount of PUFA in the chicken tissues is more influenced by the diet, whereas SFA and MUFA depend on the tissue evaluated (Díaz et al., 2013b). In this way, in the present study, the higher levels of PUFA in Mos compared to hybrid breeds may be related to a combined effect of breed and fed system.</p><p >Fat intake through the diet is related to diseases associated with modern life. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the dietary recommendations of health departments to reduce total energy intake, especially SFA. According to European Food Safety Authority, there are not enough data to define a precise fat intake to SFA, MUFA, PUFA, or n-6/n3 ratio (EFSA, 2017). Total fat intakes&gt;35E% (expressed as percentage of total dietary energy) may be compatible with both good health and normal body weight depending on dietary patterns and the level of physical activity. However, SFA intake should be as low as is possible and should be replaced by some PUFA (especially n-3 at the expense of n-6), which decreases cardiovascular diseases by reducing plasma triacylglycerol concentrations, platelet aggregation and blood pressure. However, the high proportion of PUFA per se is not necessarily healthy if the n6/n3 ratio is not balanced, which should not exceed 4 (Simopoulos, 2004; FAO, 2010b).</p><p >Overall, our findings for IMF composition were satisfactory, since cockerels presented lower SFA than other Mos category (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013), indigenous breeds (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Cassandro et al., 2015), and broilers (Wattanachant et al., 2004). In addition, PUFA content was higher than Mos roosters and hens (Franco et al., 2012a, 2013, 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018), and hybrids lines (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Franco et al., 2013, 2016; Pateiro et al., 2018), and similar to other indigenous breeds (Wattanachant et al., 2004; Jaturasitha et al., 2008; Cassandro et al., 2015). Our results for FA (high PUFA and low SFA) could be considered attractive to poultry meat consumers since FA profile obtained have positive health benefits for humans (Ashayerizadeh et al., 2018).</p><p >Regarding the individual FAs and drumstick cut, oleic acid followed by palmitic and linoleic acids were the main FA. This is in agreement with previous studies with roosters, capons and hens in Mos breed (Díaz et al., 2012, 2013b; Franco et al., 2012a; Pateiro et al., 2018). A change in the pattern was reported by Franco et al. (2016) when roosters were castrated (capons), since linoleic acid becomes the second most important FA (oleic&gt;linoleic&gt;palmitic acids). In breast, oleic acid was the predominant FA except for CR group, where oleic was replaced by palmitic acid. These findings are consistent with those found by Nkukwana et al. (2014), Cassandro et al. (2015) and Kim et al. (2020), who reported that the three most abundant FAs in chicken breast were oleic, palmitic and linoleic acids. On the contrary, these results have not been previously described in other studies with autochthonous breeds such as Thai breed, where palmitic acid was the major FA, followed by oleic, stearic and linoleic acids in both cuts (Wattanachant et al., 2004). In other studies with Black-Boned and Castellana Negra genotypes, linolenic was the main FA, followed by palmitic and oleic acids (Miguel et al., 2008; Jaturasitha et al., 2008).</p><p >Finally, the nutritional indices calculated according to the values of FA allow evaluating the ratio between healthy and unhealthy FA, giving information about the health of the fat composition (Gálvez et al., 2020). Birds fed predominantly with corn and wheat (WH and CR groups) showed significantly higher PUFA/SFA (p&lt;0.01) ratio in drumstick and breast. These results may be explained considering chemical composition of finishing diets, because CF diet has higher percentages of palmitic acid (29.30), similar oleic acid (29.70), and lower PUFA/SFA ratio than the other two finishing-diet treatments. The values obtained in drumstick are close to nutritional recommendations for human diet (0.85; FAO, 2010b). The n6/n3 ratio of breast was affected by finishing diet, being the group fed with higher wheat percentage which displayed better results (n-6/n-3&lt;4; FAO, 2010b). Like other authors, the values of AI and TI indices were higher in animals fed with fodder (Pateiro et al., 2018). Moreover, the use of corn and wheat in the finishing diet significantly (p&lt;0.001) increased h/H ratio in breast and drumstick samples. The values found in drumstick for WH group were considered favourable (h/H ≥ 2.5; Fernández et al., 2007).</p><p >Effect of diet type on amino acid profile</p><p >As can be observed, the finishing feeding affected the content of most AA. Similar findings were found in Mos roosters slaughtered at 6 and 10 months (Franco et al., 2012a). However, despite reaching statistical differences, the numerical differences among AA contents from the three dietary treatments were small, suggesting that the AA profile of muscle tissue being relatively conserved (De Smet &amp; Vossen 2016). However, the AA profile of autochthonous breeds was not similar to that of the commercial strains, since in local breeds finishing feeding had effect on the majority of AA (Franco et al., 2012b).</p><p >In both cuts, the AA profile was dominated by lysine and leucine in the essential fraction, while glutamic, aspartic and arginine were the predominant AA in the non-essential. This finding agrees with data reported by Dalle Zotte et al. (2020), who found a similar pattern in samples of breast obtained from local breed Polverara and commercial hybrids. On the other hand, Wattanachant et al. (2004) reported higher levels for some essential aminoacids, especially for valine, lysine, isoleucine, and leucine in breast samples from Thai breed and broilers (CP707 and Sasso T-44), meanwhile the rest of the AA profile was similar with exception of methionine. The values of essential/non-essential ratio also showed significant (p&lt;0.01) differences among diets, ranging between 0.71 and 0.78. These values were similar to those observed in Mos roosters (Franco et al., 2012a) and lower than those obtained in other types of poultry meat (Gálvez et al., 2018, 2020).</p><p >The total protein requirement for a human adult is 0.66 g/kg per day, with intakes per day of around 0.18 and 0.48 g/kg of essential and non-essential AA, respectively (WHO, 2007); establishing the specific requirements (expressed in mg/100g) for adults of the essential AA histidine (1.0), isoleucine (2.0), leucine (3.9), lysine (3.0), methionine (1.0), phenylalanine + tyrosine (2.5), threonine (1.5), and valine (2.6), since these AA cannot be synthesized in the body and must be supplied by the diet. Our findings showed that meat from Mos cockerels has potential nutritive value as a source of essential AA, not only for these protein percentage but also for its quality highlighted by the AA contents.</p><p >To sum up, this study allows to characterize for first time Mos cockerels fed with different finishing diets (commercial fodder, corn and wheat). Carcass weight, dressing percentage, and commercial cuts percentage (drumstick, breast, thigh, and wing) obtained were higher than previous studies with other Mos categories (roosters, capons and hens), and some autochthonous and industrial breeds, especially considering fed treatment used (CF). Meat from these birds was characterized by a high protein percentage and lower IMF with a favourable cholesterol level for human health. Birds finished with CF showed the highest content in SFA, MUFA, palmitic acid, and linolenic acid among the three groups studied. Moreover, meat from Mos cockerels reared in extensive indoor (barn-reared) conditions and using alternative fed systems, presented meat with biological value to cover the daily requirements in terms of PUFA content as well as the main essential AA. The findings of this study can boost the commercialization of other types of meats from local breeds, besides to contribute to biodiversity conservation.</p>
			</sec><sec>
			<title>References</title>
				<table-wrap><label>Table</label><table><tr><td>AOCS, 2005. AOCS official procedure Am5-04. Rapid determination of oil/fat utilizing high temperature solvent extraction. American Oil Chemists Society, Urbana, IL, USA.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Ashayerizadeh A, Dastar B, Shargh MS, et al., 2018. Effects of feeding fermented rapeseed meal on growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population, blood metabolites, meat quality, and lipid metabolism in broiler chickens. Livest Sci 216: 183-190.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2018.08.012</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Cassandro M, De Marchi M, Penasa M, Rizzi C, 2015. Carcass characteristics and meat quality traits of the Padovana chicken breed, a commercial line, and their cross. Ital J Anim Sci 14: 3848.https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3848</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Chumngoen W, Tan FJ, 2015. Relationships between descriptive sensory attributes and physicochemical analysis of broiler and Taiwan native chicken breast meat. As-Australas J Anim Sci 28: 1028-1037.https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0275</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>CIE, 1976. Colorimetry: Official recommendations of the International Commission on Illumination, CIE No. 15 E-1.3.1.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Dalle Zotte A, Ricci R, Cullere M, et al, 2020. Research Note: Effect of chicken genotype and white striping-wooden breast condition on breast meat proximate composition and amino acid profile. Poult Sci.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.066</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>De Marchi M, Dalvit C, Targhetta C, Cassandro M, 2006. Assessing genetic diversity in indigenous Veneto chicken breeds using AFLP markers. Anim Genet 37: 101-105.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2005.01390.x</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>De Smet S, Vossen E, 2016. Meat: The balance between nutrition and health. A review. Meat Sci 120: 145-156.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.04.008</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Díaz O, Rodríguez L, Torres A, Cobos A, 2012. Fatty acid composition of the meat from the Mos breed and commercial strain capons slaughtered at different ages. Grasas y Aceites 63: 296-302.https://doi.org/10.3989/gya.011312</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Díaz O, Rodríguez L, Torres A, Cobos A, 2013a. Chemical composition and physico-chemical properties of meat from capons as affected by breed and age. Span J Agric Res 8: 91.https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2010081-1147</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Díaz O, Rodríguez L, Torres A, Cobos Á, 2013b. Composition and physico-chemical properties of meat from capons fed cereals. J Integr Agric 12: 1953-1960.Domínguez R, Borrajo P, Lorenzo JM (2015a) The effect of cooking methods on nutritional value of foal meat. J Food Compos Anal 43:61-67.https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60633-4</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Domínguez R, Borrajo P, Lorenzo JM, 2015a. The effect of cooking methods on nutritional value of foal meat. J Food Compos Anal 43: 61-67.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.04.007</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Domínguez R, Crecente S, Borrajo P, et al., 2015b. Effect of slaughter age on foal carcass traits and meat quality. Animal 9: 1713-1720.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000671</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Domínguez R, Barba FJ, Centeno JA, et al., 2018. Simple and rapid method for the simultaneous determination of cholesterol and retinol in meat using normal-phase HPLC technique. Food Anal Methods 11: 319-326.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-017-1001-4</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Dyubele NL, Muchenje V, Nkukwana TT, Chimonyo M, 2010. Consumer sensory characteristics of broiler and indigenous chicken meat: A South African example. Food Qual Prefer 21: 815-819.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.04.005</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>EC, 2008. Commission Regulation (EC) No 543/2008 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards the marketing standards for poultry meat. Off J Eur Union L157: 46-87.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>EFSA, 2017. Dietary reference values for nutrients, Summary report. EFSA Support Publ 14: e15121E.https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2017.e15121</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>FAO, 2010a. Breeding strategies for sustainable management of animal genetic resources. FAO animal production and health guidelines, No. 3 Rome.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>FAO, 2010b. Fat and fatty acid requirements for adults. In: Fats and fatty acids in human nutrition. Rome, Italy, pp: 55-62.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Fernández M, Ordóñez JA, Cambero I, et al., 2007. Fatty acid compositions of selected varieties of Spanish dry ham related to their nutritional implications. Food Chem 101: 107-112.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.006</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Franco D, Rois D, Vázquez JA, et al., 2012a. Breed effect between Mos rooster, Galician indigenous breed. and Sasso T-44 line and finishing feed effect of commercial fodder or corn. Poult Sci 91: 487-498.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01546</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Franco D, Rois D, Vázquez JA, et al., 2012b. Comparison of growth performance, carcass components, and meat quality between Mos rooster (Galician indigenous breed) and Sasso T-44 line slaughtered at 10 months. Poult Sci 91:1227-1239.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2011-01942</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Franco D, Rois D, Vázquez JA, Lorenzo JM, 2013. Carcass morphology and meat quality from roosters slaughtered at eight months affected by genotype and finishing feeding. Span J Agric Res 11: 382-393.https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3094</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Franco D, Pateiro M, Rois D, et al., 2016. Effects of caponization on growth performance, carcass and meat quality of Mos breed capons reared in free-range production system. Ann Anim Sci 16: 909-929.https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0009</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Gálvez F, Domínguez R, Pateiro M, et al., 2018. Effect of gender on breast and thigh turkey meat quality. Br Poult Sci 59: 408-415.https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1465177</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Gálvez F, Domínguez R, Maggiolino A, et al., 2020. Meat quality of commercial chickens reared in different production systems: industrial, range and organic. Ann Anim Sci 20: 263-285.https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2019-0067</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Geldenhuys G, Hoffman LC, Muller N, 2015. The fatty acid, amino acid, and mineral composition of Egyptian goose meat as affected by season, gender, and portion. Poult Sci 94: 1075-1087.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev083</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Hoffmann I, 2009. The global plan of action for animal genetic resources and the conservation of poultry genetic resources. Worlds Poult Sci J 65: 286-297.https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933909000245</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>ISO 937, 1978. International standards meat and meat products - Determination of nitrogen content. International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, Switzerland.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>ISO 1442, 1997. International standards meat and meat products - Determination of moisture content. International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, Switzerland.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>ISO 936, 1998. International standards meat andmeat products - Determination of ash content. International Organization for Standarization, Geneva, Switzerland.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Jaturasitha S, Srikanchai T, Kreuzer M, Wicke M, 2008. Differences in carcass and meat characteristics between chicken indigenous to Northern Thailand, Black-Boned and Thai Native. and imported extensive breeds, Bresse and Rhode Island Red. Poult Sci 87: 160-169.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2006-00398</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Jayasena DD, Jung S, Kim HJ, et al., 2013. Comparison of quality traits of meat from korean native chickens and broilers used in two different traditional korean cuisines. As-Australas J Anim Sci 26: 1038-1046.https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12684</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Kim HJ, Kim HJ, Jeon J, et al., 2020. Comparison of the quality characteristics of chicken breast meat from conventional and animal welfare farms under refrigerated storage. Poult Sci.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.009</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Lyon BG, Smith DP, Lyon CE, Savage EM, 2004. Effects of diet and feed withdrawal on the sensory descriptive and instrumental profiles of broiler breast fillets. Poult Sci 83: 275-281.https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.2.275</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>MAPA, 2020. Raza aviar Galiña de Mos. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Spain.https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ganaderia/temas/zootecnia/razas-ganaderas/razas/catalogo-razas/aviar/galina-mos/default.aspx</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Miguel JA, Ciria J, Asenjo B, Calvo JL, 2008. Effect of caponisation on growth and on carcass and meat characteristics in Castellana Negra native Spanish chickens. Animal 2: 305-311.https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731107001127</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Muriel Duran A, 2014. The effect of caponization on production indices and carcass and meat characteristics in free-range Extremeña Azul chickens. Span J Agric Res 2: 211.https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2004022-75</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Nkukwana TT, Muchenje V, Masika PJ, et al., 2014. Fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of breast meat from broiler chickens supplemented with Moringa oleifera leaf meal over a period of refrigeration. Food Chem 142: 255-261.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.059</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Pateiro M, Lorenzo JM, Diaz S, et al., 2013. Meat quality of veal: Discriminatory ability of weaning status. Span J Agric Res 11 (4). 1044-1056.https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013114-4363</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Pateiro M, Rois D, Lorenzo JM, et al., 2018. Effect of breed and finishing diet on growth performance, carcass and meat quality characteristics of Mos young hens. Span J Agric Res 16: e0402.https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018161-12391</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Puchała M, Krawczyk J, Sokołowicz Z, Utnik-Banas̈ K, 2015. Effect of breed and production system on physicochemical characteristics of meat from multi-purpose hens. Ann Anim Sci 15: 247-261.https://doi.org/10.2478/aoas-2014-0082</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Sánchez L, de la Calle B, Iglesias A, Sánchez B, 2005. Utilización de estirpes autóctonas para la producción del pollo label. Arch Zootec 54: 491-496.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Seufert V, Ramankutty N, Foley JA, 2012. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485: 229-232.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11069</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Simopoulos AP, 2004. Omega-6/omega-3 essential fatty acid ratio and chronic diseases. Food Rev Int 20: 77-90.https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120028831</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Soares LC, Lopes JC, Brito NV, Carvalheira J, 2015. Growth and carcass traits of three Portuguese autochthonous chicken breeds: Amarela, preta lusitânica and pedrês portuguesa. Ital J Anim Sci 14: 71-76.https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2015.3566</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>USDA, 2015. 2015-2020 Dietary guidelines for americans. Washington, DC, USA.</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Wang KH, Shi SR, Dou TC, Sun HJ, 2009. Effect of a free-range raising system on growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of slow-growing chickens. Poult Sci 88: 2219-2223.https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00423</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>Wattanachant S, Benjakul S, Ledward DA, 2004. Composition, color, and texture of Thai indigenous and broiler chicken muscles. Poult Sci 83: 123-128.https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.1.123</td></tr><tr><td>○</td><td>WHO, 2007. Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition : Report of a joint FAO/WHO/UNU expert consultation. WHO Technical report Series, no. 935. Geneva, Switzerland</td></tr></table></table-wrap>
			</sec></body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <p>To sum up, this study allows to characterize for first time Mos cockerels fed with different finishing diets (commercial fodder, corn and wheat). Carcass weight, dressing percentage, and commercial cuts percentage (drumstick, breast, thigh, and wing) obtained were higher than previous studies with other Mos categories (roosters, capons and hens), and some autochthonous and industrial breeds, especially considering fed treatment used (CF). Meat from these birds was characterized by a high protein percentage and lower IMF with a favourable cholesterol level for human health. Birds finished with CF</p>
    </ack>
  </back>
</article>