<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">

<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">

	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SJAR</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>SJAR</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2171-9292</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">19062</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2022203-19062</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>

			<title-group>
				<article-title>Microencapsulated biofertilizer formulation: product development and effect on growth of green pepper seedlings</article-title>
			</title-group>

			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6706-9318</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Stamenković Stojanović</surname>
						<given-names>Sandra</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, </institution><addr-line>Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2191-4082</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Karabegović</surname>
						<given-names>Ivana</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, </institution><addr-line>Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4444-2746</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Danilović</surname>
						<given-names>Bojana</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, </institution><addr-line>Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8943-0087</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Nedović</surname>
						<given-names>Viktor</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, </institution><addr-line>Nemanjina 6, 11080 Belgrade, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>				
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4343-9246</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Kalušević</surname>
						<given-names>Ana</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>Academy of Applied Studies Belgrade, </institution><addr-line>Zoran Djindjic Bl. 152a, 11070 Belgrade, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-1575</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Mančić</surname>
						<given-names>Stojan</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, </institution><addr-line>Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6634-7686</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Lazić</surname>
						<given-names>Miodrag</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, </institution><addr-line>Bulevar Oslobodjenja 124, 16000 Leskovac, </addr-line><country>Serbia.</country></aff>
				</contrib>							
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>23</day>
				<month>06</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>			
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<month>09</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>20</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<elocation-id>e0803</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>03</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>23</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="pub">
					<day>23</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>			
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>&#xa9;2022 CSIC</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022203-19062"/>
			<abstract>
				<title>Aim of study:</title>
				<p>This study aimed to formulate a novel, commercially applicable biofertilizer, to optimize the microencapsulation procedure of <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 and examine the stability and phytostimulatory effects of obtained formulation.</p>
				<title>Area of study:</title>
				<p>Southestern Serbia.</p>
				<title>Material and methods:</title>
				<p>Microbial powder formulations were prepared using spray drying with maltodextrin as a carrier. The spray drying conditions were set according to Box-Benkhen experimental desing. The effect of the formulation was tested on green pepper (<em>Capsicum annuum</em>) seeds in controled conditions.</p>
				<title>Main results:</title>
				<p>Response surface models were developed. All of the models were statistically significant, adequately fitted and reproducible. The maximum achieved values of viability and yield in a formulation were 1.99·10<sup>9</sup> CFU/g and 96.8%, respectively, whilst the driest formulation had 1.44% moisture. The following optimum conditions were proposed for the spray drying procedure: an inlet air temperature of 133 °C, maltodextrin concentration of 50 g/L and a feed flow rate of 6.5 mL/min. The obtained microbial formulation had a high survival rate after being stored at room temperature over a 1--year period. Its application on green pepper seeds had beneficial effect on plant height, leaf dry weight and chlorophyll content of the seedlings.</p>
				<title>Research highlights:</title>
				<p><em>B. subtilis</em> was successfully microencapsulated on maltodextrin as a carrier. Interaction effects between the process variables were fully explained and statistically significant models were developed. In addition to biocontrol properties formulation had a phytostimulatory effect, excellent stability and satisfactory physical properties.</p>							
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>plant growth promotion;</kwd>
				<kwd><em>Bacillus subtilis</em>;</kwd>
				<kwd>phytostimulation;</kwd>
				<kwd>optimization</kwd>
			</kwd-group>			
		</article-meta>
		<funding-group id="fw-01">
			<award-group id="aw1">
				<funding-source rowspan="2">Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, Republic of Serbia</funding-source>
				<award-id>451-03-68/2022-14/200133</award-id>
				<award-id>451-03-9/2021-14/200116</award-id>
			</award-group>
		</funding-group>		
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Modern agriculture relies on different agrochemicals that have adverse effects on the environment and human health. Given the fact that the current situation is not sustainable, an effective alternative to agrochemicals is needed urgently (Hussain <em>et al.</em>, 2017). Microbial fertilizers (biofertilizers) are natural and environmentally safe formulations that are supposed to replace agrochemicals in modern agriculture. These formulations have the potential to stimulate plant growth, assimilate minerals from the soil and increase plant resistance to pathogens. <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> has numerous properties that make it suitable for incorporation into microbial fertilizers with the aim to stimulate plant growth and control the diseases. Due to its non-pathogenicity, pronounced antimicrobial and metabolic activity along with the ability to form endospores, this microorganism has significant potential for wide application in various fields, from medicine and pharmacy to agriculture (Mousivand <em>et al.</em>, 2012; Chauhan <em>et al.</em>, 2015; Hashem <em>et al.</em>, 2019; Malićanin <em>et al.</em>, 2020). Important features such as growth on inexpensive carbon sources, low nutritional needs, suitability for genetic manipulation, robustness and resistance while performing large-scale fermentation, make this species very attractive for further analysis and optimization for its final application in biocontrol and plant growth stimulation (Hashem <em>et al.</em>, 2019).</p>
			<p>Commercial application of microbiological fertilizers depends on the properties of the microbial formulation. A good formulation should be simple, functional and stable, exhibiting great efficiency for a long period of time. Experience from the practice often indicates poor product quality, which brings up the demand to improve biotechnological schemes for the production of such formulations (Vassilev <em>et al.</em>, 2015; Stamenković <em>et al.</em>, 2018; Stamenkovic-Stojanovic <em>et al.</em>, 2019). One of the methods to achieve good-quality microbial products is microencapsulation using spray drying.</p>
			<p>Spray drying is a promising microencapsulation technology of microorganisms that increases the resistance and durability of the final product. Owing its popularity to the fact that it enables large production capacities and generous yields, this technique is widespread and applied in various industries (Nedović <em>et al.</em>, 2013). The final product has low water activity making it stable and long-lasting. It is also easily stored, transported and manipulated (Nedovic <em>et al.</em>, 2011; Huang <em>et al.</em>, 2017). Using spray drying technology, a liquid culture is converted into a granular powder by the atomization process. Suspension particles are directed into a steam of hot air (150-200 °C) at high speeds (Huang <em>et al.</em>, 2017). Atomized droplets are very small and abundant, thus occupying a very large contact area, which allows a short drying time. Thermal inactivation of the microbial culture is possible, affected mostly by inlet and outlet temperature, air and feed flow rate, drying time and nebulizer pressure (Peighambardoust <em>et al.</em>, 2011). Most cells survive if drying is performed at lower temperatures, which in turn results in high residual moisture content and poorer product quality. Hence, the appropriate selection of the feed flow rate and inlet air temperature is crucial for the process success. The optimal values of these variables can be found by trial and error method, or by applying some of the statistical optimization methods (Baş &amp; Boyacı, 2007). The design of experiments combined with response surface methodology and Derringer’s desirability function (Derringer &amp; Suich, 1980) represents trending multiple criteria statistical methodologies which use a minimum number of experiments to obtain precise data and provide complete information about the studied phenomenon (Rodrigues <em>et al.</em>, 2019).</p>
			<p>Microencapsulation of different <em>B. subtilis</em> isolates have been a subject of a few research groups. So far they examined the influence of different inert ingredients (Yánez-Mendizábal <em>et al.</em>, 2012; Meng <em>et al.</em>, 2015) on viability and stability of the formulation, with an emphasis on the biocontrol effect. The effect of spray drying conditions have not been investigated yet, neither the possible interaction effects between the factors, which can be very important due to the nature of the process. It remains unknown what spray-drying conditions are required to achieve commercially acceptable products that assert all of the demends of the customers. Is there a compromise solution that will allow high viability along with good powder yield and low moisture content, which in turn is of great importance for the commercialization process? Does the formulation have a phytostimulatory effect in addition to biocontrol properties?</p>
			<p>In order to answer the asked questions and fill in the gaps in the previous research, this paper aimed to: (i) apply spray drying to develop novel, comercially competent microbial fertilizers; (ii) asses the individual and combined effects of important spray drying variables using Box-Benkhen experimental design and response surface methodology along with the in depth statistical analysis; (iii) provide statistically significant model equations that simulate the system behaviour; (iv) optimize the spray drying conditions using multiple criteria optimization that will consider both viability and yield, along with moisture content; and (v) examine the shelf-life of the developed product and its phytostimulatory effect on the green pepper seeds.</p>
		</sec>


		<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and methods</title>
			<sec id="sec2.1">
				<title>Microorganism</title>
				<p><em>Bacillus subtilis</em> strain NCIM 2063, obtained from the National Collection of Industrial Microorganisms (NCIM, Pune, India), was used for microencapsulation using spray drying. The bacterial strain was stored at -80 °C in a cryovial and at 4 °C on agar plates. A pre-inoculum was formed from a frozen stock by transferring a single loop to nutrient agar medium (Torlak, Serbia), comprising 0.5% peptone, 0.3% beef extract, 1.5% agar, 0.5% NaCl, and incubating at 37 °C. Erlenmeyer flask containing 300 mL of nutrient broth (Torlak, Serbia) comprising 0.5% peptone, 0.3% beef extract, 0.5% NaCl and 0.03% KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, was inoculated with a single colony and grown for 24 h in a rotary shaker at 37 °C and 150 rpm to form inoculum, 1% of which was then used for bioreactor inoculation.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.2">
				<title>Bioreactor cultivation</title>
				<p>NCIM 2063 isolate was cultivated in a 2.5 L bioreactor (KLFM, BioEngineering, Wald, Switzerland) containing sterilized DSM medium: nutrient agar, 10% (w/v) KCl, 1.2% (w/v) MgSO<sub>4</sub> with addition of 1 mL of filter-sterilized solutions: 1 M Ca(NO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>, 0.01 M MnCl<sub>2</sub> and 1 mM FeSO<sub>4</sub>. The pH was adjusted by adding 0.01 M NaOH. The culture was grown for 24 h at constant conditions: 33 °C, agitation rate of 440 rpm, airflow rate of 0.3 vvm.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.3">
				<title>Microencapsulation by spray drying </title>
				<p>After 48 h of cultivation, fermentation broth containing <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 culture was exposed to a thermal shock for 1 h at 54 °C. Fermentated broth samples were mixed with different amounts of maltodextrin (according to the Box-Benkhen experimental design) and incubated for 10 min to form a homogenous suspension. The initial concentration of viable cells was confirmed by plating on nutrient agar. Each suspension was spray dried in a laboratory scale spray drier Büchi mini B-290 (Flavil, Switzerland). The airflow rate and atomization pressure had constant values of 600 L/h and 0.55 bar, respectively. The inlet temperature and the feed flow rate were set according to the Box-Benkhen experimental design.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.4">
				<title>Experimental design</title>
				<p>he optimization of the spray drying procedure was based on the Box-Benkhen experimental design coupled with response surface technology and Deringer’s desirability function (Derringer &amp; Suich, 1980). Seventeen experiments were conducted in total, with 3 factors at 3 levels. Three independent process variables: maltodextrin concentration (10-50 g/L), inlet air temperature (110-140 °C), and feed flow rate (6-10 mL/min), were determined based on a literature search and preliminary experiments. Dependent variables: moisture content (%), product yield (%), and number of viable cells (CFU/g), were determined in triplicate; mean values were used for the regression analyses using Design Expert software package (Trial version 7.0.0, STAT-EASE Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Experimental data were fitted to the model proposed by the software. Obtained model equation was used to calculate the values predicted by the model. Model adequacy, statistical significance and deviation from the experimental results were evaluated by ANOVA. Optimization of spray drying parameters was performed using Derringer’s desirability function, which is used in complex systems requiring simultaneous optimization of several factors. Based on a optimization criteria it transforms all the system responses on a scale from 0 to 1. By combining individual functions of desirable responses, the total function of preferred responses (<em>D</em>) is calculated with a maximum value ranging from 0 (which is an unwanted answer) to 1 (desired response), and then combined into a mutual response that should have a maximum value under previously defined optimization criteria. As the value of <em>D</em> is approaching 1, the system is being closer to the global optimum value (Derringer &amp; Suich, 1980).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.5">
				<title>Viability and shelf life</title>
				<p>The number of viable microencapsulated cells was determined immediately after spray drying, after six months and one year of storage at room temperature, respectively. Powder formulation (0.1 g) was rehydrated in 0.9% saline solution (NaCl, distilled water), shaken vigorously, and allowed to rehydrate for 12 h. Viable cell concentration was determined using the spread plate method.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.6">
				<title>Moisture content determination</title>
				<p>To determine the moisture content, 2 g of the powder formulation obtained after spray drying was transferred to an aluminum dish and dried at 105 °C to a constant weight. The residual moisture content was calculated according to the following equation:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math id="mml-1">
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">moisture</mml:mi>
						<mml:mfenced separators="|">
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:mfenced>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mi>
						<mml:mfrac>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msub>
								<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msub>								
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msub>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:mfrac>
					</mml:math>
					<label>(1)</label>
				</disp-formula>	

				<p>where w<sub>f</sub> and w<sub>i</sub> are weighed mass of the formulation prior to and after drying at 105 ºC, respectively.</p>											
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.7">
				<title>Product yield</title>
				<p>The yield of the powder formulation obtained after spray drying was calculated using the following equation:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e2">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-2">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Y</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mfenced separators="">
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi>
 						</mml:mfenced>
   						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
   						<mml:mfenced separators="">
	 						<mml:msub>			 	 		
    						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
              					<mml:mrow>
                					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi>
              					</mml:mrow>            	            
   							</mml:msub>
   							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mi>		           						 
						</mml:mfenced>
						<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
	 						<mml:msub>			 	 		
    						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi>
              					<mml:mrow>
                					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi>
              					</mml:mrow>		            	            
   						 </mml:msub>				           						 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(2)</label>
   				</disp-formula>				

				<p>where W<sub>m</sub> is the weight of the recovered powder and Wp is the dry weight of the initial suspension in addition to maltodextrin.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.8">
				<title>Encapsulation efficacy</title>
				<p>Encapsulation efficacy was calculated using the following equation:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e3">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-3">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EE</mml:mi>
   						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
   						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mi>
   						<mml:mfrac>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msub>							
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:msub>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msub>
							</mml:mrow>   							
   						</mml:mfrac>				           						 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(3)</label>
   				</disp-formula>

   				<p>where N<sub>r</sub> is log cfu/mL before spray drying and N<sub>f</sub> is log cfu/mL after spray drying.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.9">
				<title>Characterization and morphology of the formulation</title>
				<p>Powder formulation obtained under optimum conditions was analyzed for hygroscopicity, solubility dissolution time and morphology of the microparticles. Hygroscopicity and solubility were determined according to the method described earlier (Bakar <em>et al.</em>, 2013), while the dissolution time was calculated as the time required for total dissolution of 1 g of powder in 50 mL distilled water using a magnetic stirrer at 829 rpm (Bhagwat <em>et al.</em>, 2020). The morphology of the formulation obtained at optimum conditions was investigated using a JEOL JSM-6610LV scanning electron microscope (30 kV accelerating voltage) with an energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (SEM/EDS; XMax Large Area Analytical Silicon Drift connected with INCAEnergy 350 Microanalysis System). Dried powder was coated with a thin gold film at 20 kV voltage to obtain a higher quality secondary electron image for further SEM examination.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.10">
				<title>Phytostimulatory effect of microencapsulated cells – Pot experiments</title>
				<p>Microencapsulated <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 formulation was evaluated for promoting growth of green pepper (<em>Capsicum annuum</em>). The experiments were conducted in growth chamber in Leskovac (Serbia) during March-April, 2019. Pepper seeds were disinfected by immersion in a mixture (1:1) of 30% hydrogen peroxide and 70% ethanol for 10 minutes, subsequently washed by immersion in distilled water several times. Seed inoculation was performed by immersion in a resuspended culture of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 with a cell density of 9.1 LOG (CFU/g), after which sowing was performed in previously sterilized plastic pots containing 200 g of dry sterilized fertile chernozem soil. Treatment was performed in 5 replications, 10 pots per replication. The seeds immersed in sterilized water served as a control. The plants were grown for 8 weeks in an incubation chamber at a constant temperature (22 °C), average relative humidity 50-60%, exposed to light of 140 µmol/m<sup>2</sup>·s wiht a 16 h photoperiod. Vegetative tissue was analyzed for: stem height, root length, number of leaves, leaves and root dry weight and leaf chlorophyll content. Dry weights were determined after drying plant tissues at 65 °C for 24 h, and then at 110 °C until constant weight (Garcia <em>et al.</em>, 2011).</p>
				<p>The leaf chlorophyll content was determined using the Hiscox &amp; Israelstam´s (1979) method. Briefly, 100 mg of leaves were immersed in 7 mL of DMSO and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. After adding DMSO to a total volume of 10 mL, 1 mL was transferred to a cuvette and the absorbance was measured at 645 and 663 nm (DMSO blank) using a UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UV/Vis Spectrophotometer - Pye Unicam Ltd, Cambridge England). The chlorophyll content was calculated using Arnon’s equations:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e4">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-4">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chla</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mfenced separators="">
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
 							<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
 						</mml:mfenced>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.0127</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A663</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.00269</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A645;</mml:mi>	 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(4)</label>
   				</disp-formula> 	

				<disp-formula id="e5">
 					<mml:math id="mml-5">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Chlb</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mfenced separators="">
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
 							<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
 						</mml:mfenced>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.0229</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A645</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.00468</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A663;</mml:mi>	 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(5)</label>
   				</disp-formula> 

				<disp-formula id="e6">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-6">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tot Chl</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mfenced separators="">
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi>
 							<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
 							<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi>
 						</mml:mfenced>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.0202</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A645</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.00802</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A663;</mml:mi>	 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(6)</label>
   				</disp-formula>   				
			</sec>									
			<sec id="sec2.11">
				<title>Statistical analyses</title>
				<p>All experiments were performed in three parallel replications, and the results were presented as mean value of three repetitions ± standard deviation. The programs Origin 6.0, Excel 2013 and Expert Design 7.0 were used for statistical processing, modeling and graphical analysis of experimental data. Multicriteria optimization was performed by applying the Box-Benkhen experimental design, Response surface methodology and Deringer’s desirability function. The adequacy of the response surface model was assessed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>

		<sec id="sec3" sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>The influence of three process factors: maltodextrin concentrations (A, 10, 30 and 50 g/L), inlet air temperature (B, 110, 125 and 140 °C), and feed flow rate (C, 6; 8 and 10 mL/min) on spray drying of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 was assessed using Box-Benkhen experimental design. The full matrix of the experimental design with the experimental and predicted values of the response variables is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>, while the results of ANOVA are represented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2.</xref></p>

			<table-wrap id="t1">
				<label>Table 1</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Box-Benkhen experimental design and obtained responses during the spray drying of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063</title>
				</caption>
				<table>
					<thead>
						<tr>
							<th align="center">Run</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="3">Uncoded factors<sup>[1]</sup></th>
							<th align="center" colspan="7">Responses</th>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center">A</th>
							<th align="center">B</th>
							<th align="center">C</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Viability, LOG (CFU/g)</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Yield,%</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Moisture content,%</th>
							<th align="center">Encapsulation efficacy,%</th>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center">ЕXP<sup>[2]</sup></th>
							<th align="center">PRED<sup>[3]</sup></th>
							<th align="center">ЕXP</th>
							<th align="center">PRED</th>
							<th align="center">ЕXP</th>
							<th align="center">PRED</th>								
							<th align="center"></th>
						</tr>																											
					</thead>
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">1</td>
							<td align="center">50</td>
							<td align="center">140</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.83±0.06</td>
							<td align="center">8.83</td>
							<td align="center">93.51±1.13</td>
							<td align="center">94.35</td>
							<td align="center">2.43±0.13</td>
							<td align="center">2.40</td>
							<td align="center">89.61</td>																
						</tr>
						<tr>										
							<td align="center">2</td>
							<td align="center">50</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">6</td>
							<td align="center">9.19±0.13</td>
							<td align="center">8.97</td>
							<td align="center">96.80±2.26</td>
							<td align="center">97.20</td>
							<td align="center">3.20±0.1</td>
							<td align="center">3.01</td>
							<td align="center">93.26</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>										
							<td align="center">3</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.70±0.1</td>
							<td align="center">8.68</td>
							<td align="center">75.83±0.99</td>
							<td align="center">77.62</td>
							<td align="center">3.51±0.18</td>
							<td align="center">3.46</td>
							<td align="center">88.29</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">4</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.55±0.08</td>
							<td align="center">8.68</td>
							<td align="center">81.38±0.85</td>
							<td align="center">77.62</td>
							<td align="center">3.60±0.04</td>
							<td align="center">3.46</td>
							<td align="center">86.77</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">5</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.79±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">8.68</td>
							<td align="center">80.65±0.57</td>
							<td align="center">77.62</td>
							<td align="center">3.01±0.3</td>
							<td align="center">3.46</td>
							<td align="center">89.20</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>			
							<td align="center">6</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">140</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">7.90±0.00</td>
							<td align="center">7.94</td>
							<td align="center">80.35±0.99</td>
							<td align="center">80.25</td>
							<td align="center">2.40±0.19</td>
							<td align="center">2.18</td>
							<td align="center">80.17</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">7</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">110</td>
							<td align="center">6</td>
							<td align="center">8.56±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">8.67</td>
							<td align="center">86.09±1.27</td>
							<td align="center">85.59</td>
							<td align="center">5.30±1.13</td>
							<td align="center">5.12</td>
							<td align="center">86.83</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.69±0.05</td>
							<td align="center">8.68</td>
							<td align="center">77.70±1.98</td>
							<td align="center">77.62</td>
							<td align="center">3.51±0.14</td>
							<td align="center">3.46</td>
							<td align="center">88.15</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>										

							<td align="center">9</td>
							<td align="center">50</td>
							<td align="center">110</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">9.30±0.00</td>
							<td align="center">9.41</td>
							<td align="center">68.36±0.99</td>
							<td align="center">68.46</td>
							<td align="center">5.88±0.12</td>
							<td align="center">6.48</td>
							<td align="center">94.38</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">6</td>
							<td align="center">8.04±0.14</td>
							<td align="center">8.08</td>
							<td align="center">89.11±0.55</td>
							<td align="center">90.46</td>
							<td align="center">4.13±0.14</td>
							<td align="center">4.33</td>
							<td align="center">81.59</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">11</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">140</td>
							<td align="center">6</td>
							<td align="center">8.30±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">8.38</td>
							<td align="center">95.16±1.27</td>
							<td align="center">93.92</td>
							<td align="center">1.44±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">0.58</td>
							<td align="center">84.23</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">12</td>
							<td align="center">50</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">8.93±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">8.96</td>
							<td align="center">86.15±0.85</td>
							<td align="center">84.80</td>
							<td align="center">8.90±0.64</td>
							<td align="center">9.86</td>
							<td align="center">90.62</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">13</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">110</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.65±0.12</td>
							<td align="center">8.52</td>
							<td align="center">47.33±0.21</td>
							<td align="center">46.48</td>
							<td align="center">6.30±0.16</td>
							<td align="center">6.37</td>
							<td align="center">87.82</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">14</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">8.09±0.11</td>
							<td align="center">8.07</td>
							<td align="center">55.87±1.27</td>
							<td align="center">55.47</td>
							<td align="center">5.19±0.07</td>
							<td align="center">5.52</td>
							<td align="center">82.10</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">15</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">110</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">8.94±0.13</td>
							<td align="center">8.95</td>
							<td align="center">39.15±0.10</td>
							<td align="center">40.39</td>
							<td align="center">9.10±1.29</td>
							<td align="center">8.46</td>
							<td align="center">90.72</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">16</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">125</td>
							<td align="center">8</td>
							<td align="center">8.69±0.06</td>
							<td align="center">8.68</td>
							<td align="center">72.53±0.28</td>
							<td align="center">77.62</td>
							<td align="center">3.71±1.03</td>
							<td align="center">3.46</td>
							<td align="center">88.24</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">17</td>
							<td align="center">30</td>
							<td align="center">140</td>
							<td align="center">10</td>
							<td align="center">8.10±0.11</td>
							<td align="center">8.08</td>
							<td align="center">91.23±2.26</td>
							<td align="center">91.73</td>
							<td align="center">3.42±0.14</td>
							<td align="center">3.54</td>
							<td align="center">82.20</td>
						</tr>																																																				
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<table-wrap-foot>
					<fn id="TFN1">
						<p><sup>[1]</sup> A: maltodextrin concentration. g/L. B: inlet temperature (°C). C: feed flow rate. mL/min. <sup>[2]</sup> EXP: experimental values. <sup>[3]</sup> PRED: values predicted by the model.</p>
					</fn>
				</table-wrap-foot>
			</table-wrap>			


			<p>Based on multiple regression of the experimental results an empirical relationship was developed for all tested dependent and independent variables in the form of second-order polynomial model equations. Non-significant model terms were eliminated from the model. ANOVA results revealed that it is possible to plot the response surface for the experimental design (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). All of the models were statistically significant, indicated by the high F values of the model, small <em>p</em> values (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05) and insignificant lack of fit. The values of coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and adjusted R<sup>2</sup> (Adj R<sup>2</sup>) were close to 1 for all models, denoting that experimental data are adequately fitted and deviating minimally from the predicted values.</p>

			<table-wrap id="t2">
				<label>Table 2</label>
				<caption>
					<title>ANOVA for the model equations obtained for viability. yield and moisture content in the spray-dried formulation of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063</title>
				</caption>
				<table>
					<thead>
						<tr>
							<th align="center">Source of variation</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Viability</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Yield</th>
							<th align="center" colspan="2">Moisture</th>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<th align="center"></th>
							<th align="center"><em>F</em> value</th>
							<th align="center"><em>p</em> value</th>
							<th align="center"><em>F</em> value</th>
							<th align="center"><em>p</em> value</th>
							<th align="center"><em>F</em> value</th>
							<th align="center"><em>p</em> value</th>														
						</tr>																			
					</thead>
					<tbody>
						<tr>
							<td>Model</td>
							<td align="center">40.8</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">54.99</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">40.85</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>						
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><em>A</em></td>
							<td align="center">132.10</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">51.50</td>
							<td align="center">0.0002</td>
							<td align="center">0.1</td>
							<td align="center">0.76</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><em>B</em></td>
							<td align="center">55.84</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">92.86</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">35.02</td>
							<td align="center">0.0006</td>							
						</tr>						
						<tr>
							<td><em>C</em></td>
							<td align="center">3.1</td>
							<td align="center">0.106</td>
							<td align="center">174.44</td>
							<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							<td align="center">22.57</td>
							<td align="center">0.0010</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><em>AB</em></td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">1.76</td>
							<td align="center">0.2260</td>
							<td align="center">34.26</td>
							<td align="center">0.0006</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><em>AC</em></td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">0.0223</td>
							<td align="center">14.54</td>
							<td align="center">0.0066</td>
							<td align="center">0.17</td>
							<td align="center">0.6909</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><em>BC</em></td>
							<td align="center">7.06</td>
							<td align="center">0.0120</td>
							<td align="center">52.69</td>
							<td align="center">0.0002</td>
							<td align="center">2.77</td>
							<td align="center">0.1401</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>A<sup>2</sup></td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">0.16</td>
							<td align="center">0.7005</td>
							<td align="center">12.67</td>
							<td align="center">0.0092</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>B<sup>2</sup></td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">10.39</td>
							<td align="center">0.0146</td>
							<td align="center">1.94</td>
							<td align="center">0.2059</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>C<sup>2</sup></td>
							<td align="center">9.01</td>
							<td align="center">-</td>
							<td align="center">11.72</td>
							<td align="center">0.0111</td>
							<td align="center">16.47</td>
							<td align="center">0.0048</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td>Lack of fit</td>
							<td align="center">1.99</td>
							<td align="center">0.2643</td>
							<td align="center">0.23</td>
							<td align="center">0.8724</td>
							<td align="center">2.06</td>
							<td align="center">0.2477</td>							
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td><strong>Factor</strong></td>
							<td align="center"><strong>R<sup>2</sup></strong></td>
							<td align="center"><strong><em>Adj</em> R<sup>2</sup></strong></td>
							<td align="center"><strong><em>Pred</em> R<sup>2</sup></strong></td>
							<td align="center"><strong>CV%</strong></td>
							<td align="center"><strong>MRPD%</strong></td>					
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">Viability</td>
							<td align="center">0.9488</td>
							<td align="center">0.9256</td>
							<td align="center">0.8527</td>
							<td align="center">1.28</td>
							<td align="center">0.6</td>					
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">Yield</td>
							<td align="center">0.9861</td>
							<td align="center">0.9681</td>
							<td align="center">0.9488</td>
							<td align="center">3.82</td>
							<td align="center">1.79</td>					
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="center">Moisture</td>
							<td align="center">0.9813</td>
							<td align="center">0.9573</td>
							<td align="center">0.8069</td>
							<td align="center">7.08</td>
							<td align="center">4.63</td>					
						</tr>																					
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<table-wrap-foot>
					<fn id="TFN2">
						<p>CV%: coefficient of variation. MRPD: mean relative percentage deviation.</p>
					</fn>
				</table-wrap-foot>
			</table-wrap>				

			<sec id="sec3.1">
				<title>Effect of spray drying on viability and encapsulation efficacy</title>
				<p>Various factors showed a significant effect on product viability, and thus the efficacy of encapsulation. The experimental data log values were subjected to a nonlinear regression analysis and fitted to a second-order polynomial model function that predicts the viability of cells in spray dried powder:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e7">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-7">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Viability</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.02A</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.02B</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">1.25C</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">4.86</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-3</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msup>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.04C</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>		 			           						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(7)</label>
   				</disp-formula>


   				<p>The results of <em>B. subtilis</em> viability affected by spray drying inlet temperature, feed flow rate and maltodextrin concentration are visually represented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1</xref> in the form of three-dimensional (3D) response surfaces. It can be seen that an increase in concentration of maltodextrin had a positive effect on the viability of microorganisms in the final product, regardless of inlet temperature. Although in most cases an increase in temperature reduced the cell viability, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1a</xref> clearely shows that increasing the feed flow rate can reduce the negative impact of temperature. Encapsulation efficacy undergoes the same dependancy pattern as viability. A maximum number of viable cells within the tested range (1.99·10<sup>9</sup> CFU/g) and a maximum encapsulation efficacy (94.38%) were achieved at the lowest temperature (110° C), medium flow rate (8 mL/min) and the maximum concentration of maltodextrin (50 g/L).</p>

				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Response surface plots for <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 viability after spray drying at different temperatures: a) 110 °C; b) 140 °C.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-1" xlink:href="img/e0803-fig1.jpg"/>
				</fig>  				
   			</sec>
   			<sec id="sec3.2">
   				<title>Effect of spray drying on the product yield</title>
   				<p>The yield of dry powder after spray drying varied from 39.2 to 96.8%. The influence of selected variables on product yield was determined by the response surface method. Regression analysis of experimental data presents the response equation:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e8">
	 				<mml:math id="mml-8">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Yield</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">109.53</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">74.73</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">6.55</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-3</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AB</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mi> 	
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AC</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi> 
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo> 
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">1.47</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-3</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>  
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">1.23</mml:mi> 
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup> 					    						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(8)</label>
   				</disp-formula>

   				<p>Based on response surface analysis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref>), it can be concluded that the maximum yield was achieved by a simultaneous increase of maltodextrin concentration and temperature. The influence of maltodextrin concentration was most pronounced at the highest tested temperatures, while at lower temperatures, a decrease in feed flow rate weakened the influence of maltodextrin. Increasing the feed flow rate generally reduced the yield of the product, but as the temperature increased, the influence of the flow rate on the yield decreased.</p>

				<fig id="f2">
					<label>Figure 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Response surface plots for product yield after spray drying at different temperatures: a) 110 °C; b) 140 °C.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-2" xlink:href="img/e0803-fig1.jpg"/>
				</fig>

   			</sec>
   			<sec id="sec3.3">
   				<title>Effect of spray drying on moisture content</title>
   				<p>Quality formulation should contain less than 5% moisture after spray drying (Peighambardoust <em>et al.</em>, 2011), although some authors indicate that up to 12% moisture is also acceptable for bacterial formulation. Low moisture content prevents contamination of the product and provides longer shelf life (Keswani <em>et al.</em>, 2016). Hence, the combination of factors that reduce the moisture content was considered most desirable. The following model equation was proposed:</p>

				<disp-formula id="e9">
 					<mml:math id="mml-9">
 						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">lnY</mml:mi>
 						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">7.19</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.072</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>	
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">1.09</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">6.75</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-5</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AB</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">4.96</mml:mi> 	
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-3</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AC</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2.71</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-3</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi> 
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo> 
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">4.23</mml:mi>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-4</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2.95</mml:mi>
       					<mml:mo>·</mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">-4</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup>
       					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>  
       					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mi> 
						<mml:msup>			 	 		
        					<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi>
	              				<mml:mrow>
	                				<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mi>
	              				</mml:mrow>            	            
       					</mml:msup> 					    						
   					</mml:math>
   					<label>(9)</label>
   				</disp-formula>

   				<p>where <em>Y</em> is moisture content (%).</p>

   				<p>An increase in temperature and decrease in feed flow rate decreased the moisture content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Fig 3</xref>). However, the influence of maltodextrin concentration is insignificant. Although maltodextrin concentration dose did not affect moisture content significantly, the influence of maltodextrin concentration became more pronounced at a lower feed flow rate in the examined range. Hence, when maltodextrin concentration was increased along with the low feed flow rate, the moisture content gradually decreased. Still, at higher feed flow rates, maltodextrin did not play a crucial role for this system response.</p>

   				<fig id="f3">
					<label>Figure 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Response surface plots for product yield after spray drying at different temperatures: a) 110 °C; b) 140 °C.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-3" xlink:href="img/e0803-fig3.jpg"/>
				</fig>

   			</sec>
			<sec id="sec3.4">
   				<title>Multiple criteria optimization of spray drying procedure</title>
   				<p>Spray drying variables were optimized using Derringer’s desirability function in order to obtain a microbial formulation of maximum viability and yield with a minimum residual moisture.</p>
   				<p>According to desirability criteria (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>) the following conditions were proposed for spray drying of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 with D=0.87: temperature 133 oC, maltodextrin concentration 50 g/L and feed flow rate 6.5 mL/min.</p>

	   			<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Multicriteria optimization goals and ranges</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Low level</th>
								<th align="center">High level</th>
								<th align="center">Significance</th>
								<th align="center">Criteria</th>
							</tr>																			
						</thead>
						<tbody>											
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Temperature, ºC</td>
								<td align="center">110</td>
								<td align="center">140</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">In range</td>																												
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Maltodextrin concentration, g/L</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">50</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">In range</td>																												
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed flow rate, mL/min</td>
								<td align="center">6</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">In range</td>																												
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Number of viable cells, CFU/g</td>
								<td align="center">7.9</td>
								<td align="center">9.3</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">Maximum</td>																												
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Yield, %</td>
								<td align="center">39.15</td>
								<td align="center">96.8</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">Maximum</td>																												
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Moisture, %</td>
								<td align="center">1.43</td>
								<td align="center">9.03</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">Minimum</td>																												
							</tr>							
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>

   				<p>The optimized solution (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 4</xref>) proposed in this study was validated in laboratory conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>), which confirmed the minimum deviation of experimental and software predicted values, as well as the high survival rate of encapsulated bacteria after being stored at room temperature for six months and one year.</p>

   				<fig id="f4">
					<label>Figure 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Optimization using Deringer’s desirability function: desirability bar graph.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-4" xlink:href="img/e0803-fig4.jpg"/>
				</fig>

	   			<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Validation of optimum spray drying factor values in laboratory conditions and characterization of obtained formulation</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Variable</th>
								<th align="center">Experimental value</th>
								<th align="center">Predicted value</th>	
							</tr>																	
						</thead>
						<tbody>											
							<tr>
								<td>Viability after spray drying, LOG (CFU/g)</td>
								<td align="center">9.18 ± 0.01</td>
								<td align="center">9.07</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Viability after six months, LOG (CFU/g)</td>
								<td align="center">8.93 ± 0.0</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Viability after one year, LOG (CFU/g)</td>
								<td align="center">8.45 ± 0.21</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Yield, %</td>
								<td align="center">92.6 ± 1.98</td>
								<td align="center">96.8</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Moisture content, %</td>
								<td align="center">2.90 ± 0.28</td>
								<td align="center">2.53</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Hygroscopicity (g H20/g powder)</td>
								<td align="center">0.21 ± 0.02</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Solubility, %</td>
								<td align="center">0.311 ± 0.32</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Dissolution time, s</td>
								<td align="center">79.00 ± 5.00</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>																											
							</tr>																												
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>				

   			</sec>
   			<sec id="sec3.5">
   				<title>Physical characterization and morphology of the obtained particles</title>
   				<p>The morphology of microcapsules (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 5</xref>) can be described as amorphous glassy structure, varying from flat and deflated to round spherical particles with porous surface. The diameter of spherical particles obtained in this study ranged from 5 to 300 µm. The dimensions of the particles are not of crucial importance as they can be modifed subsequently, by granulation adjustment methods. The outer surfaces of the microcapsules were characterized by the presence of indentation, with a few cracks on the surface. On the other hand, variables such as hygroscopicity, dissolution time and solubility (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) showed that the powder has enhanced stability and a potential to be stored long-term, which was also proven by high number of surviving cells after one-year period.</p>

   				<fig id="f5">
					<label>Figure 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>SEM microphotogrpaphs of microcapsules obtained at optimum spray drying conditions.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-5" xlink:href="img/e0803-fig5.jpg"/>
				</fig>

   			</sec>			
   			<sec id="sec3.6">
   				<title>Phytostimulatory effect of obtained formulation on green pepper </title>
   				<p>The effect of pepper seeds treatment with a spray-dried microbial formulation of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 on growth variables is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>. The application of formulation resulted in a significant increase in the leaf dry weight and plant height, while root weight and leaf number did not differ significantly from the control. Particularly, plants treated with the formulation were about 40% higher and had almost 3 times larger weight of the leaves, than the control.</p>

	   			<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Phytostimulatory effect of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 formulation when applied onto green pepper seeds</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center"><em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2603</th>
								<th align="center">Control</th>	
							</tr>																		
						</thead>
						<tbody>											
							<tr>
								<td>Plant height, cm</td>
								<td align="center">16.66±2.88a</td>
								<td align="center">11.97±2.41b</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Number of leaves</td>
								<td align="center">3.66±0.58a</td>
								<td align="center">3.33±0.57a</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Leaf dry weight, mg</td>
								<td align="center">100.47±20.7a</td>
								<td align="center">38.33±12.58b</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Root dry weight, mg</td>
								<td align="center">4.86±0.3a</td>
								<td align="center">4.1±0.60a</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Chlorophyll <em>a</em>, g/L</td>
								<td align="center">10.2±1.85a</td>
								<td align="center">5.77±0.46b</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Chlorophyll <em>b</em>, g/L</td>
								<td align="center">3.66±0.57a</td>
								<td align="center">2.9±0.65b</td>																											
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total chlorophyll, g/L</td>
								<td align="center">13.66±3.05a</td>
								<td align="center">8.67±1.53b</td>																											
							</tr>																												
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>Values (mean ± SD) with different letter in the same row denote significant differences at p &lt;0.05 (Tukey’s range test)</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>					
				</table-wrap>

   				<p>It is known that chlorophyll plays a key role in the process of photosynthesis and that its content is an indicator of the capacity of photosynthesis and plant health. <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref> shows a significant positive effect of <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2069 isolate on chlorophyll content in treated pepper seedlings. Compared to the control, the application of the formulation significantly increased the content of chlorophyll a (by 76.77%) and chlorophyll b (by 52.5%). This in turn contributed to an increase in the total chlorophyll content in peppers by 57.5% compared to the control.</p>
   			</sec>
   		</sec>

		<sec id="sec4" sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<sec id="sec4.1">
				<title>Statistical analyses and model fitting</title>
				<p>Quadriatic model equation was found to be adequate and statistically significant for all three of the tested variables. Apart from F, p and lack of fit values, goodness of fit was also confirmed by an adequate mean relative percent deviation (MRPD) value. More than 94% of variation can be explained by the models and their adequacy was confirmed by the compliance of the predicted R<sup>2</sup> (Pred R<sup>2</sup>) and Adj R<sup>2</sup>, which differ in less than 0.2. Adequate values of the coefficient of variation (CV) confirmed that the models are reproducible.</p>
				<p>The linear effect of inlet temperature was found to be significant for all response variables at 99% confidence interval. This factor also demonstrated a strong interaction effect with the feed flow rate affecting viability and yield, along with maltodextrin concentration affecting moisture content. Among other interaction effects, the interaction of maltodextrin concentration with feed flow rate was found to be significant at a 95% confidence level for moisture content. Maltodextrin concentration also exhibited a positive linear effect on viability and yield, while the linear effect of the feed flow rate was found to be significant for the yield and the moisture. The positive linear effect of a dependent variable reveals that increase in its value also causes increase in the response. Although feed flow rate did not show statistical significance for viability as an individual linear term, squared and interacting with temperature, this factor nevertheless shows statistical significance at a 95% confidence level, which denotes that the optimum level is within the experimental region, and not at the extremes (Table 2) (Baş &amp; Boyacı, 2007). Similarly, in the case of spray dried <em>Bacillus thuringiensis</em>, Adjallé <em>et al.</em> (2011) found that linear terms of temperature and feed flow rate had a statistically significant positive effect on the viability, their quadratic terms had a negative effect, while interaction terms were not statistically significant. Wang <em>et al.</em> 2018) also found that inlet air temperature and feed flow rate had the greatest effect on the survival of spray-dried <em>Sphingomonas</em> sp. in the formulation. The same factors, particularly their linear, quadratic and interaction effects were also found statistically significant by Seth <em>et al.</em> (2017) for the moisture content in the spray drying process of <em>Streptococcus thermophilus</em> and <em>Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus</em>. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec4.2">
				<title>Effect of spray drying conditions on product quality</title>
				<p>Processes of mass multiplication and formulating procedures are the most important steps for the effectiveness of the obtained formulation. Therefore, to obtain a commercially competent, stable and effective product, the influence of crucial drying varibles on product properties should be carefully analyzed and explained (Vassilev <em>et al.</em>, 2015). Product yield, the number of viable cells per gram of the product and mositure content are the three variables that denote the quality of the product: its potential to colonize the plant’s root, durability and economical profitability. Hence, spray drying should be conducted with a combination of variables that will enable high yield powder formulation with good cell viability and minimum moisture content.</p>
				<p>Although in most cases an increase in temperature affects the reduction of cell viability, the research has shown that increasing the feed flow rate can reduce the negative impact of temperature. Namely, increasing the feed flow rate leads to a decrease in the temperature on the surface of the droplets, which causes changes in heat transfer thus reducing the physical damage to the bacteria cell membranes (Behboudi-Jobbehdar <em>et al.</em>, 2013). In the present work, we noticed that the feed flow rate influence was more pronounced at lower and medium temperatures within the examined range. Nevertheless, feed flow rate values in the range 6-8 mL/min had practically no impact on the survival of microorganisms in the formulation when applied in combination with higher temperatures. Maxiumum number of viable cells achived in this study was 1.99·10<sup>9</sup> CFU/g, which is consistent with previous results of spray drying <em>B. subtilis</em> CPA-8 when the viability of 3.3·10<sup>9</sup> CFU/g was achieved at feed flow rate of 8 mL/min with the addition of MgSO<sub>4</sub> (Yánez-Mendizábal <em>et al.</em>, 2012). The difference in the number of surviving cells can be attributed to the difference in carriers and the cultivation conditions applied before spray drying (Peighambardoust <em>et al.</em>, 2011).</p>
				<p>The results of this study indicate that the maximum yield was achieved by a simultaneous increase of maltodextrin concentration and temperature. Such effect is explained by a fact that a higher concentration of the carrier in the feed increases the viscosity, thus reducing the radial velocity of the particles. This in turn reduces the possibility of collision with the walls of the drying chamber and increases the number of particles reaching the collecting vessel which directly increseas the yield (Schuck, 2009). Decrease in feed flow rate also increases the yield of the product. The same effect was noticed for the moisture content of the formulation. High temperatures combined with low feed flow rate guarantee a low moisture content. An increase in inlet air temperature creates a larger temperature gradient between atomized particles and hot air, which enables a stronger driving force to remove moisture. That in turn reduces the likelihood of agglomeration of microparticles and the deposit formation on the walls of the drying chamber, which directly affects the increase in yield (Amiet-Charpentier <em>et al.</em>, 1998; Adhikari <em>et al.</em>, 2005). On the other hand, an increase in feed flow rate affects the formation of larger droplets, which makes evaporation more difficult, resulting in higher residual moisture and lower yield (Seth <em>et al.</em>, 2017). This conclusion is consistent with previous spray drying results of <em>Lactobacillus acidophilus</em> (Behboudi-Jobbehdar <em>et al.</em>, 2013) and <em>Pseudomonas putida</em> (Amiet-Charpentier <em>et al.</em>, 1998) which state that the yield was increased significantly after a simultaneous increase in air inlet temperature and feed flow rate. Seth <em>et al.</em> (2017) also concluded that in the spray drying process of <em>Streptococcus thermophilus</em> and <em>Lactobacillus delbrueckii bulgaricus</em>, temperature and flow rate had the greatest influence on the moisture content, whose linear, quadratic and interaction effects were statistically significant. Other authors examined the influence of different carriers (skimmed milk and MgSO<sub>4</sub>) on the moisture content of the <em>B. subtilis</em> CPA 8 formulation obtained by spray drying. The lowest moisture content (6%) was achieved at 150 °C and 8 mL/min by applying 10% skimmed milk powder and 10% MgSO<sub>4</sub> (Yánez-Mendizábal <em>et al.</em>, 2012). Given that the lowest moisture content achieved in the present work was 1.4%, it is concluded that maltodextrin in combination with the high inlet air temperature achieves a significantly better effect.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec4.3">
				<title>Multicriteria optimization of spray drying procedure</title>
				<p><em>B. subtilis</em> NCNIM 2063 powder formulation had the best viability when spray dried on low temperatures and high feed-flow rates in the tested intervals. Contrary to that, high temperature and low feed flow rate valus are needed to obtain the highest yield and the lowest moisture content of the same formulation. To obtain products in satisfactory yield, viability and moisture content at the same time, multicriteria optimization was performed. The results of multicriteria optimization revealed that the ideal spray drying temperature value is 133 °C, while maltodextrin concentration and feed flow rate should be set to 50 g/L and 6.5 mL/min, respectively. A much higher temperature (180 °C) was used by Adjallé <em>et al.</em> (2011) for microencapsulation of <em>B. thuringiensis</em> by spray drying at a feed flow rate of 0.29 g/min, which resulted in 2.2·10<sup>8</sup> viable cells in the dry formulation.</p>
				<p>Behboudi-Jobbehdar <em>et al.</em> (2013) achieved the maximum desirability of Deringer’s function for spray drying of <em>L. acidophilus</em> at 133.54 °C at a feed flow rate of 7.14 mL/min, using maltodextrin in combination with glucose and whey protein as a carrier; under these optimal conditions, the viability of  8.59 CFU/g and a water activity of 0.171 were achieved. The differences in optimized values of spray drying are mainly attributed to differences in the used strains and their properties, which is why it is necessary to perform optimization for each microbial species separately. As far as <em>Bacillus</em> is concerned, one-factor optimization was performed by Ma <em>et al.</em> (2015) for spray drying of <em>B. subtilis</em> with maltodextrin and gum arabic; under the proposed optimal conditions (temperature 140 ºC and feed flow rate 9.1 mL/min), 4.83-5.35·10<sup>8</sup> CFU/g was reached. Barcelos <em>et al.</em> (2014) dealt with spray drying of biosurfactants obtained from <em>B. subtilis</em> LBBMA RI4914, used as a carrier maltodextrin at a concentration of 250 g/L. Our study showed that it is possible to use lower inlet air temperatures in combination with a lower feed flow rate to achieve better viability of the bacterial culture. Significant savings can also be achieved from the aspect of consumed material, considering that significantly lower concentrations of maltodextrin are sufficient for the achievement of satisfactory results. Morphology of the particles is also in accordance with previous literature data. While the presence of indentation is usual for polysaccharide carries, cracks can be attributed to a long storage time (Campos <em>et al.</em>, 2014). Maltodextrin as a carrier can particularly influence the morphology of the particles (Behboudi-Jobbehdar <em>et al.</em>, 2013).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec4.4">
				<title>Phytostimulatory effect of the formulation</title>
				<p>lity to adhere to the pepper seed surface and positively influence the growth of the seedlings in the early period. The positive effect of the isolate is a result of its ability to produce growth hormones and siderophores, affect nitrogen fixation, and phosphorus solubilization (Ben Khedher <em>et al.</em>, 2021). Similarly, <em>B. subtilis</em> SL-13 isolate increased pepper leaf area (Tao <em>et al.</em>, 2019), <em>B. subtilis</em> CAS 15 contributed to an increase in yield, height and weight of pepper (Yu <em>et al.</em>, 2011), while <em>B. subtilis</em> V26 promoted the growth of potato seedlings (Ben Khedher <em>et al.</em>, 2021). Yu <em>et al.</em> (2011) explained that microbial siderophores, which are produced by this microbe, stimulte plant growth as they increase the availability of the iron in the soil. Additionaly, <em>B. subtilis</em> produces indole acetic acid, which stimulates plant cell division and allows better adsorption of minerals and water, which in turn results in better growth parameters (Swain <em>et al.</em>, 2007).</p>
				<p>The increase in leaf dry weight observed in this study, is in a correlation with the increased content of chlorophyll a and b and the total chlorophyll in the leaves. The contents of chlorophyll a and b achieved in this study was almost 3.5 times higher than the one achieved by the isolate <em>B. subtilis</em> SL-13 (Tao <em>et al.</em>, 2019). Multiple increases in chlorophyll content is explained by the ability of this isolate to modulate endogenous signaling molecules for glucose and abscisic acid, which have a regulatory role in the process of photosynthesis (Zhang <em>et al.</em>, 2008). Very often, in addition to chlorophyll, an increase in content of other pigments, such as α-tocopherol and β-carotene can be observed (Sonbarse <em>et al.</em>, 2020). A mechanistic study confirmed that applying <em>B. subtilis</em> to pepper seeds improves the efficiency of photosystem II and positively affects photosynthesis by increasing the amount of chlorophyll and the rate of carbon dioxide assimilation. Such an effect is explained by the increase in the electron transfer rate in the thylakoid membrane due to the action of the bacterium (Samaniego-Gámez <em>et al.</em>, 2016).</p>
				<p>In conclusion, this research proved that <em>B. subtilis</em> NCIM 2063 can be succesffuly microencapsulated with maltodextrin using spray drying procedure at following conditions: temperature 133 °C, maltodextrin concentration 50 g/L and feed flow rate 6.5 mL/min. Additionaly, the influence of spray drying process variables on the most important formulation characteristics is determined and explained, which greatly facilitates the selection of drying conditions with other plant growth-promoting microorgansms and encourages future research on this subject. Obtained formulation was stable over a 1-yer period and had several positive plant growth-promoting traits, facilitating the growth of green pepper seedlings in controled conditions. The next step of the research shall be the confirmation of the phytostimulatory effect in field conditions, after which commercialization of the product can be started. </p>
			</sec>			
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>We thank Jovana Malbašić, University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mining and Geology (Belgrade, Serbia) for assistance with SEM analysis.</p>
		</ack>		
		<author-notes>
			<title>Author's Contributions</title>
			<fn>Conceptualization: M. Lazić, B. Danilović</fn>
			<fn>Data curation: I. Karabegović, S. Stamenković Stojanović</fn>
			<fn>Formal analysis: A. Kalušević, V. Nedović</fn>
			<fn>Funding acquisition: M. Lazić, B. Danilović</fn>
			<fn>Investigation: S. Stamenković Stojanović</fn>
			<fn>Methodology: I. Karabegović, S. Mančić</fn>
			<fn>Project administration: M. Lazić, B. Danilović</fn>
			<fn>Resources: A. Kalušević, V. Nedović</fn>
			<fn>Supervision: M. Lazić</fn>
			<fn>Validation: S. Stamenković Stojanović</fn>
			<fn>Writing – original draft: S. Stamenković Stojanović</fn>
			<fn>Writing – review &amp; editing: S. Stamenković Stojanović, S. Mančić, I. Karabegović</fn>
		</author-notes>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Adhikari</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Howes</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lecomte</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bhandari</surname>
							<given-names>BR</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>A glass transition temperature approach for the prediction of the surface stickiness of a drying droplet during spray drying.</article-title>
					<source>Powder Technol</source>
					<issue>149</issue>
					<fpage>168</fpage>
					<lpage>179</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.11.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.11.007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Adjallé</surname>
							<given-names>KD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vu</surname>
							<given-names>KD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tyagi</surname>
							<given-names>RD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Brar</surname>
							<given-names>SK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Valéro</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Surampalli</surname>
							<given-names>RY</given-names>
						</string-name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Optimization of spray drying process for <em>Bacillus thuringiensis</em> fermented wastewater and wastewater sludge.</article-title>
					<source>Bioprocess Biosyst Eng</source>
					<issue>234</issue>
					<fpage>237</fpage>
					<lpage>246</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0466-y">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00449-010-0466-y</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Amiet-Charpentier</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gadille</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Digat</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Benoit</surname>
							<given-names>JP</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Microencapsulation of rhizobacteria by spray-drying: Formulation and survival studies.</article-title>
					<source>J Microencapsul</source>
					<issue>15</issue>
					<fpage>639</fpage>
					<lpage>659</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/02652049809008247">https://doi.org/10.3109/02652049809008247</ext-link>					
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bakar</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ee</surname>
							<given-names>SC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Muhammad</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hashim</surname>
							<given-names>DM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Adzahan</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Spray-drying optimization for red pitaya peel (Hylocereus polyrhizus).</article-title>
					<source>Food Bioprocess Technol</source>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>1332</fpage>
					<lpage>1342</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0842-5">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-012-0842-5</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Barcelos</surname>
							<given-names>GS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dias</surname>
							<given-names>LC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>PL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>R de CR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Borges</surname>
							<given-names>AC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kalks</surname>
							<given-names>KHM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tótola</surname>
							<given-names>MR</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Spray drying as a strategy for biosurfactant recovery, concentration and storage.</article-title>
					<source>Springerplus</source>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>9</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-49">https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-3-49</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Baş</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Boyacı </surname>
							<given-names>İH</given-names>
						</string-name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology.</article-title>
					<source>J Food Eng</source>
					<issue>78</issue>
					<fpage>836</fpage>
					<lpage>845</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.11.024</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Behboudi-Jobbehdar</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Soukoulis</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yonekura</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fisk</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Optimization of spray-drying process conditions for the production of maximally viable microencapsulated <em>L. acidophilus</em> NCIMB 701748.</article-title>
					<source>Dry Technol</source>
					<issue>31</issue>
					<fpage>1274</fpage>
					<lpage>1283</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.788509">https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2013.788509</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ben Khedher</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mejdoub-Trabelsi</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tounsi</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>																						
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Biological potential of <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> V26 for the control of Fusarium wilt and tuber dry rot on potato caused by Fusarium species and the promotion of plant growth.</article-title>
					<source>Biol Control</source>
					<issue>152</issue>
					<elocation-id>104444</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104444">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104444</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bhagwat</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bhushette</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Annapure</surname>
							<given-names>US</given-names>
						</string-name>																	
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Spray drying studies of probiotic Enterococcus strains encapsulated with whey protein and maltodextrin. Beni-Suef Univ.</article-title>
					<source>J Basic Appl Sci</source>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>15</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-020-00061-z">https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-020-00061-z</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Campos</surname>
							<given-names>DC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Acevedo</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Morales</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aravena</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Amiard</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jorquera</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Inostroza</surname>
							<given-names>NG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rubilar</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Microencapsulation by spray drying of nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with lupin nodules.</article-title>
					<source>World J Microbiol Biotechnol</source>
					<issue>30</issue>
					<fpage>2371</fpage>
					<lpage>2378</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1662-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-014-1662-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chauhan</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bagyaraj</surname>
							<given-names>DJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Selvakumar</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sundaram</surname>
							<given-names>SP</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Novel plant growth promoting rhizobacteria-Prospects and potential.</article-title>
					<source>Appl Soil Ecol</source>					
					<issue>95</issue>
					<fpage>38</fpage>
					<lpage>53</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.05.011</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Derringer</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Suich</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>																																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1980</year>
					<article-title>Simultaneous optimization of several response variables.</article-title>
					<source>J Qual Technol</source>
					<issue>12</issue>
					<fpage>214</fpage>
					<lpage>219</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968">https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1980.11980968</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Garcia</surname>
							<given-names>AL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Madrid</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gimeno</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rodriguez-Ortega</surname>
							<given-names>WM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nicolas</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Garcia-Sanchez</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>																																											
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>The effects of amino acids fertilization incorporated to the nutrient solution on mineral composition and growth in tomato seedlings.</article-title>
					<source>Span J Agric Res</source>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<fpage>852</fpage>
					<lpage>861</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110903-399-10">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110903-399-10</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hashem</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tabassum</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fathi Abd</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>																												
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title><em>Bacillus subtilis</em>: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress.</article-title>
					<source>Saudi J Biol Sci</source>
					<issue>26</issue>
					<fpage>1291</fpage>
					<lpage>1297</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hiscox</surname>
							<given-names>JD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Israelstam</surname>
							<given-names>GF</given-names>
						</string-name>																												
					</person-group>
					<year>1979</year>
					<article-title>A method for the extraction of chlorophyll from leaf tissue without maceration.</article-title>
					<source>Can J Bot</source>
					<issue>57</issue>
					<fpage>1332</fpage>
					<lpage>1334</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-163">https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-163</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vignolles</surname>
							<given-names>ML</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>XD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Le Loir</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jan</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Schuck</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jeantet</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>																												
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Spray drying of probiotics and other food-grade bacteria: A review.</article-title>
					<source>Trends Food Sci Technol</source>
					<issue>63</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>17</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.02.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.02.007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hussain</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Abbasi </surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Abbasi</surname>
							<given-names>SA</given-names>
						</string-name>																											
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Detoxification of parthenium (<em>Parthenium hysterophorus</em>) and its metamorphosis into an organic fertilizer and biopesticide.</article-title>
					<source>Bioresour Bioprocess</source>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>9</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0156-6">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-017-0156-6</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Keswani</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bisen</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Singh</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sarma</surname>
							<given-names>BK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Singh</surname>
							<given-names>HB</given-names>
						</string-name>																							
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Formulation technology of biocontrol agents: present status and future prospects.</article-title>
					<source>In: Bioformulations for sustainable agriculture (Arora NK &amp; Mehnaz S, eds).</source>
					<publisher>Springer</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>New Delhi, India</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>35</fpage>
					<lpage>52</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2779-3_2">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2779-3_2</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nie</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Microencapsulation of <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> B99-2 and its biocontrol efficiency against Rhizoctonia solani in tomato.</article-title>
					<source>Biol Control</source>
					<issue>90</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>10</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.05.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Malićanin</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Danilović</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cvetković</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Stamenković-Stojanović</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nikolić</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lazić</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karabegović</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Modulation of aroma and sensory properties of Prokupac wines by a Bacillus-based preparation applied to grapes prior to harvest.</article-title>
					<source>South Afr J Enol Vitic</source>
					<issue>41</issue>
					<fpage>158</fpage>
					<lpage>167</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21548/41-2-4016">https://doi.org/10.21548/41-2-4016</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Meng</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yin</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>																																							
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Dry flowable formulations of antagonistic <em><em>Bacillus subtilis</em></em> strain T429 by spray drying to control rice blast disease.</article-title>
					<source>Biol Control</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>46</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.03.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2015.03.004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>	
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mousivand</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Salehi Jouzani</surname>
							<given-names>GH</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hashemi</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>																											
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Biofilm formation improved the biocontrol of <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> against Fusarium head blight.</article-title>
					<source>N Biotechnol</source>
					<issue>29</issue>
					<fpage>S23</fpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.08.058">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2012.08.058</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nedovic</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kalusevic</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Manojlovic</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Levic</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bugarski</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																			
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>An overview of encapsulation technologies for food applications.</article-title>
					<source>Procedia Food Sci</source>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>1806</fpage>
					<lpage>1815</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.265">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.265</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nedović</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kalušević</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Manojlović</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Petrović</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bugarski</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>																					
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Encapsulation systems in the food industry.</article-title>
					<source>In: Advances in food process engineering research and applications; Yanniotis S <em>et al.</em> (eds.)</source>
					<fpage>229</fpage>
					<lpage>253</lpage>
					<publisher>Springer</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Boston</publisher-loc>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7906-2_13">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7906-2_13</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Peighambardoust</surname>
							<given-names>SH</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Golshan Tafti</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hesari</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>										
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Application of spray drying for preservation of lactic acid starter cultures: A review.</article-title>
					<source>Trends Food Sci Technol</source>
					<issue>22</issue>
					<fpage>215</fpage>
					<lpage>224</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2011.01.009</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>AC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fontão</surname>
							<given-names>AI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Coelho</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Leal</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Soares da Silva</surname>
							<given-names>FAG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wan</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>																							
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Response surface statistical optimization of bacterial nanocellulose fermentation in static culture using a low-cost medium.</article-title>
					<source>N Biotechnol</source>
					<issue>49</issue>
					<fpage>19</fpage>
					<lpage>27</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2018.12.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2018.12.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>	
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Samaniego-Gámez</surname>
							<given-names>BY</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Garruña</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tun-Suárez</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kantun-Can</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Reyes-Ramírez</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cervantes-Díaz</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Bacillus spp. inoculation improves photosystem II efficiency and enhances photosynthesis in pepper plants.</article-title>
					<source>Chil J Agr Res</source>
					<issue>76</issue>
					<fpage>409</fpage>
					<lpage>416</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392016000400003">https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392016000400003</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ferrer-Lorenzo</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</string-name>													
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Factores de competitividad del sector vitivinícola español.</article-title>
					<source>PhD Thesis</source>
					<publisher>University of Zaragoza</publisher>
					<size>289 pp</size>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Schuck</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Understanding the factors affecting spray-dried dairy powder properties and behavior.</article-title>
					<source>In: Dairy-derived ingredients: food and nutraceutical uses.</source>
					<fpage>24</fpage>
					<lpage>50</lpage>
					<publisher>Elsevier Ltd.</publisher>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697198.1.24">https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845697198.1.24</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>	
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seth</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mishra</surname>
							<given-names>HN</given-names>
						</string-name>	
						<string-name>
							<surname>Deka</surname>
							<given-names>SC</given-names>
						</string-name>																													
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Effect of spray drying process conditions on bacteria survival and acetaldehyde retention in sweetened yoghurt powder: An optimization study.</article-title>
					<source>J Food Process Eng</source>
					<issue>40</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>10</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12487">https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12487</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sonbarse</surname>
							<given-names>PP</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kiran</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sharma</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Parvatam</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Biochemical and molecular insights of PGPR application for the augmentation of carotenoids, tocopherols, and folate in the foliage of Moringa oleifera.</article-title>
					<source>Phytochemistry</source>
					<issue>179</issue>
					<elocation-id>112506</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112506">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112506</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Stamenković</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Beškoski</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karabegović</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lazić</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nikolić</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>																												
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Microbial fertilizers: A comprehensive review of current findings and future perspectives.</article-title>
					<source>Span J Agric Res</source>
					<issue>16</issue>
					<elocation-id>e09R01</elocation-id>					
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018161-12117">https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018161-12117</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Stamenkovic-Stojanovic</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karabegovic</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Beskoski</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nikolic</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lazic</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																	
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Bacillus based microbial formulations: Optimization of the production process.</article-title>
					<source>Hem Ind</source>
					<issue>73</issue>
					<fpage>169</fpage>
					<lpage>182</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND190214014S">https://doi.org/10.2298/HEMIND190214014S</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Swain</surname>
							<given-names>MR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Naskar</surname>
							<given-names>SK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ray</surname>
							<given-names>RC</given-names>
						</string-name>																																					
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Indole-3-acetic acid production and effect on sprouting of yam [Dioscorea rotundata L.] minisetts by <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> isolated from culturable cowdung microflora.</article-title>
					<source>Polish J Microbiol</source>
					<issue>56</issue>
					<fpage>5</fpage>
					<lpage>15</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tao</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wei</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>	
						<string-name>
							<surname>He</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ye</surname>
							<given-names>BC</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title><em>Bacillus subtilis</em> SL-13 biochar formulation promotes pepper plant growth and soil improvement.</article-title>
					<source>Can J Microbiol</source>
					<issue>65</issue>
					<fpage>333</fpage>
					<lpage>342</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2018-0333">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjm-2018-0333</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vassilev</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vassileva</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lopez</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martos</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>	
						<string-name>
							<surname>Reyes</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Maksimovic</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Unexploited potential of some biotechnological techniques for biofertilizer production and formulation.</article-title>
					<source>Appl Microbiol Biotechnol</source>
					<issue>99</issue>
					<fpage>4983</fpage>
					<lpage>4996</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6656-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6656-4</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>	
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																				
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Optimization of fed-batch fermentation and direct spray drying in the preparation of microbial inoculant of acetochlor-degrading strain <em>Sphingomonas</em> sp. DC-6.</article-title>
					<source>3 Biotech</source>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>9</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1324-x">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-018-1324-x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yánez-Mendizábal</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Viñas</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Usall</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Torres</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>	
						<string-name>
							<surname>Solsona</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Abadias</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Teixidó</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</string-name>		
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Formulation development of the biocontrol agent <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> strain CPA-8 by spray-drying.</article-title>
					<source>J Appl Microbiol</source>
					<issue>112</issue>
					<fpage>954</fpage>
					<lpage>965</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05258.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05258.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ai</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Xin</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>			
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>The siderophore-producing bacterium, <em>Bacillus subtilis</em> CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper.</article-title>
					<source>Eur J Soil Biol</source>
					<issue>47</issue>
					<fpage>138</fpage>
					<lpage>145</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.11.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Xie</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>MS</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kornyeyev</surname>
							<given-names>DA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Holaday</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Paré</surname>
							<given-names>PW</given-names>
						</string-name>														
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Soil bacteria augment Arabidopsis photosynthesis by decreasing glucose sensing and abscisic acid levels in planta.</article-title>
					<source>Plant J</source>
					<issue>56</issue>
					<fpage>264</fpage>
					<lpage>273</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03593.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03593.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>																	
		</ref-list>			
	</back>
</article>