<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">

<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">

	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">SJAR</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title>Span J Agric Res</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2171-9292</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA)</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">19149</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5424/sjar/2022203-19149</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>

			<title-group>
				<article-title>Inclusion of olive by-products in growing diets causes minor effects on meat quality of Iberian pigs fattened in a traditional system</article-title>
			</title-group>

			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5240-2832</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Palma-Granados</surname>
						<given-names>Patricia</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Centro de I+D en Cerdo Ibérico, </institution><addr-line>Ctra EX101 km 4,7, 06300 Zafra (Badajoz), </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Dept. Mejora Genética, </institution><addr-line>Ctra de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0851-608X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>García-Casco</surname>
						<given-names>Juan M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Centro de I+D en Cerdo Ibérico, </institution><addr-line>Ctra EX101 km 4,7, 06300 Zafra (Badajoz), </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Dept. Mejora Genética, </institution><addr-line>Ctra de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5309-9321</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Fernández-Barroso</surname>
						<given-names>Miguel A.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff1"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Centro de I+D en Cerdo Ibérico, </institution><addr-line>Ctra EX101 km 4,7, 06300 Zafra (Badajoz), </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Dept. Mejora Genética, </institution><addr-line>Ctra de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8649-750X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>López-García</surname>
						<given-names>Adrián</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Dept. Mejora Genética, </institution><addr-line>Ctra de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8007-1228</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Martínez-Torres</surname>
						<given-names>José M.</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff3"><institution>Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias, Dept. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, INURA. </institution><addr-line>Universidad de Extremadura, Ctra de Cáceres s/n. 06071 Badajoz, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7018-6977</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Muñoz</surname>
						<given-names>María</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff2"><institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Dept. Mejora Genética, </institution><addr-line>Ctra de la Coruña km 7.5, 28040 Madrid, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-9092</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>González-Sánchez</surname>
						<given-names>Elena</given-names>
					</name>
					<aff id="aff3"><institution>Escuela de Ingenierías Agrarias, Dept. Producción Animal y Ciencia de los Alimentos, INURA. </institution><addr-line>Universidad de Extremadura, Ctra de Cáceres s/n. 06071 Badajoz, </addr-line><country>Spain.</country></aff>
				</contrib>													
			</contrib-group>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub">
				<day>29</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>			
			<pub-date pub-type="collection">
				<month>09</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>20</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<elocation-id>e0607</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>03</day>
					<month>01</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>29</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="pub">
					<day>29</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>			
			<permissions>
				<copyright-statement>&#xa9;2022 CSIC</copyright-statement>
				<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
					<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<self-uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022203-19149"/>
			<abstract>
				<title>Aim of study:</title>
				<p>To evaluate two experimental diets based on olive cake supplied during the growth period as an alternative to the restricted feeding applied in the production of Iberian pigs fattened with acorn (Montanera system).</p>
				<title>Area of study:</title>
				<p>Southwest of Badajoz, Spain.</p>
				<title>Material and methods:</title>
				<p>44 Iberian pigs were divided in three diet groups: 1) control (C) group (n=15), 2) dry olive pulp (DOP) group, fed a compound feed elaborated with olive pulp (n=14), and 3) wet crude olive cake (WCOC) group, fed a compound feed and olive cake silage supplied <em>ad libitum</em> (n=15). Subcutaneous fat biopsies were taken and backfat thickness and <em>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> (LTL) area were measured. In addition, quality traits (intramuscular fat percentage, color, pigment content, water holding capacity and shear force) were measured in LTL. Backfat fatty acid profile and intramuscular fat were also analysed.</p>
				<title>Main results:</title>
				<p>Significant differences were observed between groups for most of the fatty acids in backfat at 95 kg but differences were of lower magnitude at 160 kg and affected only to C16:1, C18:0, C18:1, C20:0, C20:1 and ΣSFA. Otherwise, lower values for red color and myoglobin content and higher for thawing water losses were observed for DOP pigs. The WCOC did not affect the analysed quality traits.</p>
				<title>Research highlights:</title>
				<p>Experimental diets did not have an important impact on growth, carcass composition or meat quality. Therefore, WCOC dietary treatment could be an interesting alternative that could reduce the undesirable effects of feed restriction.</p>		
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group>
				<kwd>native pigs;</kwd>
				<kwd>feed restriction;</kwd>
				<kwd>fatty acids;</kwd>
				<kwd>alternative diets;</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<abbrev>BW
				<def>(body weight)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>C
				<def>(control)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>C_CF
				<def>(compound feed of C)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>CL 
				<def>(cooking loss)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>DOP
				<def>(dry olive pulp)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>DOP_CF
				<def>(compound feed of DOP)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>FA
				<def>(fatty acids)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>FAMEs
				<def>(FA methyl esters)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>LTL
				<def>(<em>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> muscle)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>M_CF
				<def>(compound feed in finishing period)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>MUFA
				<def>(monounsaturated FA)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>PUFA
				<def>(polyunsaturated FA)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>SFA
				<def>(saturated FA)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>TL
				<def>(thawing loss)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>WCOC
				<def>(wet crude olive cake)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>WCOC_CF
				<def>(compound feed of WCOC)</def>
			</abbrev>
			<abbrev>WHC
				<def>(water holding capacity)</def>
			</abbrev>
		</article-meta>
		<funding-group id="fw-01">
			<award-group id="aw1">
				<funding-source>European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and in-novation program. The contents of this manuscript reflect only the views of the authors and the European Union Agency is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.</funding-source>
				<award-id>Grant agreement No 634476 (Project acronym: TREASURE)</award-id>
			</award-group>
		</funding-group>		
	</front>
	
	<body>
		<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>The traditional production system of the Iberian pig includes a finish-fattening period (up to approximately 160 kg with a minimum length of 60 days) known as Montanera, based on an <em>ad libitum</em> intake of acorns and pastures (López-Bote, 1998). The usual preparation of the animals for this final fattening system includes reaching a weight between 92 and 115 kg at 12 months of age, at the end of the growth period before Montanera. These requirements were incorporated into the current Spanish Quality Standard for Iberian Products (BOE, 2014). Therefore, a strong restricted diet is required to slow down the growth rate and prevent the animals for an excessive fatness. However, this restriction causes undesirable feed stress with a consequent negative effect on animal welfare. One of the possible alternatives to minimize this problem is the use of low-energy diets and high fiber supplements that increase the satiety feeling and improve animal welfare.</p>

			<p>Indigenous breeds and the use of local feed resources are closely linked issues in integrated and sustainable agriculture and livestock (Rodríguez &amp; Preston, 1997). By-products derived from olive oil production have been proposed for animal feed in the Mediterranean areas (Molina-Alcaide &amp; Nefzaoui, 1996), since they meet the necessary energy and fiber requirements for the animals and they are cheap. Spain is the world’s largest producer of olive oil, making these by-products easy to obtain (Davidson, 2014). In addition to this, it should be noted that the use of agricultural residues would be in accordance with sustainability principles, leading to a reduction in the costs of agricultural and livestock production (De Miguel <em>et al.,</em> 2015).</p>

			<p>In Iberian pig production, olive-based by-products have been proposed as raw material in feed components for growing and finishing pigs (Benito <em>et al.,</em> 1998; Hernandez-Matamoros <em>et al.,</em> 2011; Joven <em>et al.,</em> 2014; González-Sánchez <em>et al.,</em> 2016). According to these studies, pigs fed with olive by-products did not suffer negative growth rate effects or lower final slaughter weight, but they did show a positive effect on the backfat fatty acid profile, with an increase of the percentage of oleic acid and a decrease of the saturated fatty acids. However, to our knowledge, no study has been done on the usefulness of these by-products for the traditional period of feed restriction prior to the Montanera practiced in finishing Iberian pigs. Likewise, it has not been studied whether this type of diet can affect other parameters related to the quality of the meat, such as color, water holding capacity or texture.</p>

			<p>The purpose of this study was to explore the suitability of using by-products from olive oil industry supplied in the diet of Iberian Montanera pigs during the growth period by means of two different diets including olive cake. The effects on the growth rate, carcass composition and meat quality traits have been studied.</p>
		</sec>

		<sec id="sec2" sec-type="materials|methods">

			<title>Material and methods</title>

			<sec id="sec2.1">
				<title>Olive by-products description</title>
				
				<p>The by-products of the olive were obtained in several steps. First, the olive oil was extracted, and the remainders of the process was the wet crude olive cake, a semi-liquid paste made of olive pulp, skin, stone and 71% water. After that, the stone was removed, and a second oil extraction was carried out. The resulting pastry was partially dehydrated obtaining the dry olive pulp, which contains skin, pieces of olive stones and a small proportion of olive oil (Alburquerque <em>et al.,</em> 2004; Molina-Alcaide &amp; Yáñez-Ruiz, 2008). Olive pulp and crude olive cake were the two by-products used in the formulation of experimental diets of this study, whose analytical composition is showed in Table 1.</p>

				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Analytical composition (g/100 g dry matter) and fatty acid composition (g/100g total lipids) of the feeds used in the experiment.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">By-products</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Growing feeds<sup>[1]</sup></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Finishing feeds</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">Olive pulp</th>
								<th align="center">Crude olive cake</th>
								<th align="center">C_CF</th>
								<th align="center">DOP_CF</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC_CF</th>
								<th align="center">M_CF<sup>[2]</sup></th>
								<th align="center">Acorn pulp</th>
								<th align="center">Grass</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" colspan="9"><strong>Analytical composition</strong></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter</td>
								<td align="center">91.2</td>
								<td align="center">28.8</td>
								<td align="center">89.1</td>
								<td align="center">90.9</td>
								<td align="center">89.7</td>
								<td align="center">89.6</td>
								<td align="center">66.7</td>
								<td align="center">22.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">7.5</td>
								<td align="center">10.3</td>
								<td align="center">19.4</td>
								<td align="center">16.2</td>
								<td align="center">27.9</td>
								<td align="center">15.1</td>
								<td align="center">5.9</td>
								<td align="center">16.5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ether extract</td>
								<td align="center">10.8</td>
								<td align="center">8.4</td>
								<td align="center">4.0</td>
								<td align="center">6.4</td>
								<td align="center">1.9</td>
								<td align="center">7.6</td>
								<td align="center">9.2</td>
								<td align="center">3.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude fibre</td>
								<td align="center">22.0</td>
								<td align="center">42.0</td>
								<td align="center">4.6</td>
								<td align="center">21.4</td>
								<td align="center">5.5</td>
								<td align="center">6.2</td>
								<td align="center">2.6</td>
								<td align="center">23.6</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ashes</td>
								<td align="center">3.4</td>
								<td align="center">6.5</td>
								<td align="center">7.3</td>
								<td align="center">10.4</td>
								<td align="center">11.1</td>
								<td align="center">5.2</td>
								<td align="center">1.7</td>
								<td align="center">12.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ME Mcal/kg DM<sup>[3]</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.27</td>
								<td align="center">1.75</td>
								<td align="center">3.42</td>
								<td align="center">2.13</td>
								<td align="center">3.15</td>
								<td align="center">3.52</td>
								<td align="center">4.04</td>
								<td align="center">2.21</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center" colspan="9"><strong>Fatty acid composition<sup>[4]</sup></strong></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:0</td>
								<td align="center">13.60</td>
								<td align="center">13.81</td>
								<td align="center">19.56</td>
								<td align="center">12.68</td>
								<td align="center">17.55</td>
								<td align="center">7.32</td>
								<td align="center">14.56</td>
								<td align="center">24.19</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:0</td>
								<td align="center">3.27</td>
								<td align="center">3.91</td>
								<td align="center">6.92</td>
								<td align="center">3.96</td>
								<td align="center">3.82</td>
								<td align="center">3.70</td>
								<td align="center">4.94</td>
								<td align="center">5.76</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:1</td>
								<td align="center">66.00</td>
								<td align="center">69.17</td>
								<td align="center">36.15</td>
								<td align="center">59.14</td>
								<td align="center">25.51</td>
								<td align="center">70.94</td>
								<td align="center">63.29</td>
								<td align="center">14.66</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:2</td>
								<td align="center">13.40</td>
								<td align="center">9.78</td>
								<td align="center">31.00</td>
								<td align="center">19.33</td>
								<td align="center">46.21</td>
								<td align="center">16.22</td>
								<td align="center">13.85</td>
								<td align="center">14.09</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:3</td>
								<td align="center">1.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.87</td>
								<td align="center">2.80</td>
								<td align="center">1.95</td>
								<td align="center">4.96</td>
								<td align="center">1.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.71</td>
								<td align="center">35.09</td>
							</tr>																												
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p><sup>[1]</sup> Control (C_CF), dry (DOP_CF) and wet (WCOC_CF) compound feeds during the growing period. <sup>[2]</sup> Compound feed in finishing period (M_CF). <sup>[3]</sup> Calculated according to de Blas et al. (2010). <sup>[4]</sup> Major fatty acids of the 12 total fatty acids identified.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>									
				</table-wrap>
			
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.2">
				<title>Animals, diets, and experimental design</title>
				
				<p>Animal manipulations were performed according to the Spanish Policy for Animal Protection RD 53/2013, which meets the European Union Directive 2010/63/EU about the protection of animals used in experimentation. The experimental protocol was approved by the Bioethical Committee of the Extremadura region.</p>
				
				<p>A total of 44 Iberian pigs were included in the experiment, being 29 and 15 castrated males and females, respectively. The amount of daily feed supplied, health status, growth and fatness were controlled from post-weaning to slaughter. These animals were randomly allocated in three different pens (one group per pen), at 6.5 months of age and 42 kg (SD 8.6 kg) body weight (BW). Two pens housed 15 pigs and the other one, 14 pigs. All the pens had open and covered places, and the total area of each pen was 110 m2 that were adjacent to each other, with the same water availability and spatial orientation. The animals were separated in three groups according to dietary treatment during the growing period: control (C, n=15, 9 males and 6 females), dry olive pulp (DOP, n=14, 9 males and 5 females) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC, n=15, 11 males and 4 females) group, respectively. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>, a description of by-products, diets and groups is presented. Control group (C) was fed a compound feed (C_CF) formulated to cover the protein and energy requirements of the growth period. The DOP group was fed a compound feed (DOP_CF) containing a 45% of olive pulp by-product. Finally, the WCOC group was fed crude olive cake by-product in silage form to facilitate its conservation, and a specific compound feed (WCOC_CF) as a complement. As the crude olive cake is a semi-solid by-product, it had to be mixed with a solid support in order to transform it into a suitable raw material that can be administered to pigs. Therefore, a mixture with 75% of crude olive cake and 25% of barley straw was made for preparing the silage. Thereafter, it was packed under high pressure resulting in a 42.5% dry matter mix. The DOP_CF, WCOC_CF and silage crude olive cake products were not commercially available, and they were made specifically for this experiment. The analytical compositions of the feed used in each dietary treatment are shown in Table 1. The corresponding ingredients of the different compound feeds supplied to each group are described in Table 2. All compound feeds were provided as pellets.</p>

				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Experimental design diagram during growing period. Description of by-products, diets and feeding and experimental groups.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic id="gra-1" xlink:href="img/e0607-fig1.jpg"/>
				</fig>				


				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Ingredients (g/1000 g fresh matter) of compound feeds used throughout the experiment.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="3">Growing feeds<sup>[1]</sup></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">Finishing feeds<sup>[2]</sup></th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">C_CF</th>
								<th align="center">DOP_CF</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC_CF</th>
								<th align="center">M_CF</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Barley</td>
								<td align="center">421.5</td>
								<td align="center"></td>
								<td align="center">416</td>
								<td align="center">400</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Wheat</td>
								<td align="center">250</td>
								<td align="center">110</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">344</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Soybean meal, 44% crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">255</td>
								<td align="center">155.3</td>
								<td align="center">500</td>
								<td align="center">90</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Sunflower seed, high oleic acid</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">130</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Animal fat</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Olive pulp</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">450</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Cereal straw</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">250</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L-Lysine 50</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">2.2</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>DL-Methionine</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L-Threonine</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Calcium carbonate</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center"></td>								
								<td align="center">12</td>
								<td align="center">11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Dicalcium phosphate</td>
								<td align="center">20</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">38</td>
								<td align="center">8</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Sodium chloride</td>
								<td align="center">8</td>
								<td align="center">2</td>
								<td align="center">14</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Binder</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Vitamin and mineral premix<sup>[3]</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.5</td>
								<td align="center">3.5</td>
								<td align="center">8</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p><sup>[1]</sup> Control (C_CF), dry (DOP_CF) and wet (WCOC_DF) compound feed during the growing period.<sup>[2]</sup> Compound feed in finishing period (M_CF). <sup>[3]</sup> Provided (per kg of premix): 166500 IU retinol as retinyl acetate, 33300 IU cholecalciferol, 1100 mg DL-α-tocopherol as DL- α-tocopheryl acetate, 40 mg menadione as menadione sodium bisulfite, 32 mg thiamine, 100 mg riboflavin, 66 mg pyridoxine, 1600 mg biotin, 74 mg cyanocobalamin, 15 mg folic acid, 500 mg nicotinic acid, 268 mg D-pantothenic acid as calcium pantothenate, 668 mg Cu as CuSO<sub>4</sub>·5H<sub>2</sub>O, 5000 mg Fe as FeSO<sub>4</sub>·7H<sub>2</sub>O, 1300 mg Mn as MnSO<sub>4</sub>·4H<sub>2</sub>O, 3300 mg Zn as ZnO, 13.4 mg I as KI and 10 mg Se as Na<sub>2</sub>SeO<sub>3</sub>.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>

				<p>The animals were fed these diets for 191 days, reaching 95 kg (SD 13.7 kg) of BW at the end of the growth period with 12 months age. Daily weight gain was controlled every three weeks by monitoring individual weight and the food provided was adjusted according to BW. With this objective, the compound feeds were administered in a restricted way (60 and 70% <em>ad libitum</em> for WCOC_CF and C_CF, respectively), while the silage crude olive cake by-product was supplied <em>ad libitum</em>. DOP_CF was supplied <em>ad libitum</em> during the first days, however, the excessive intake of the DOP_CF concentrate, together with a high consumption of water by the animals advised a supplementation with a restricted regimen (60% <em>ad libitum</em>) as well.</p>

				<p>Following the traditional livestock uses to take advantage of natural resources, at the end of the growth period all pigs were rearranged into three new batches and distributed in three fences (batches) with oak trees according to their BW and the availability of pasture and acorn on each fence. In the first batch (Mont1), the animals were fed exclusively on acorn and grass. In the second one (Mont2), in addition to the pastures and the scarce acorn available in that fence, a daily high-oleic compound feed was supplied (2 kg per day and pig), specific for the Montanera period (M_CF). The animals of the third batch (Mont3) were fed exclusively with acorns and grass during approximately 35 days, after that (116 days), the amount of acorn decreased so much that it was not enough for feeding and pigs were fed the same M_CF supplement up to slaughter weight (4 kg per day and pig). Pigs from each one of the three experimental groups were allocated in each one of the three fattening groups (Table 3). The average length of this period was 123 days (SD 16 days) and afterwards pigs were slaughtered in three different dates (Slaughter 1 to 3, Table 3) at 162 kg BW (SD 8.8 kg). Samples of acorns and pasture from different fences were collected and analysed (Table 1).</p>

				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Number of animals in each dietary experimental group, Montanera group and slaughter date.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" rowspan="3">Experimental group <sup>[1]</sup></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="6"><em>Montanera</em> group</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" colspan="2">Mont 1</th>
								<th align="center">Mont 2</th>
								<th align="center">Mont 3</th>
								<th align="center" rowspan="2">Total</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Slaughter 1</th>
								<th align="center">Slaughter 2</th>
								<th align="center">Slaughter 2</th>
								<th align="center">Slaughter 3</th>
							</tr>							
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>C</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>								
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>DOP</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">6</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
								<td align="center">14</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>WCOC</td>
								<td align="center">7</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">2</td>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total</td>
								<td align="center">11</td>
								<td align="center">12</td>
								<td align="center">13</td>
								<td align="center">8</td>
								<td align="center">44</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p><sup>[1]</sup>Control group (C), dry olive pulp group (DOP) and wet crude olive cake group (WCOC).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>									
				</table-wrap>				

				<p>Backfat thickness, at the level of the last lumbar vertebra, and <em>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> muscle (LTL) area (LMA) were measured at the end of the growth period using PIE Medical-Aquila real-time ultrasound equipment, with an 18 cm probe and 3.5 MHz (Pie Medical Equipment B.V., Maastricht, The Netherlands). The ultrasound images were stored and subsequently interpreted using AutoCAD 2017 (Auto-CAD Academic Software. Mill Valley, CA, USA: Autodesk In). At the same time, backfat biopsies were taken from the rear part of the body for fatty acid profile analysis, approx. 4-6 cm from the midline of the spine in the dorsal lumbar region, at a depth of about 2 cm. Samples were obtained using a cylindrical biopsy device with a sharpened edge 0.5 cm in diameter under local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine-HCI (Alphacaine; Fendigo, Brussels, Belgium). Pigs were previously tranquilized by intramuscular injection of 2 mg/kg BW of azaperon (Stresnil, Esteve, Barcelona, Spain). After the biopsy, the area was sprayed with oxytretracycline and lidocaine (Veterin Tenicol; Lab. Intervet S.A., Salamanca, Spain). All necessary measures were taken to prevent and avoid discomfort of the animals during and after the process. Biopsy samples were placed in cryotubes, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C until analysis.</p>

				<p>The day before slaughter, the animals were weighted. Pigs were euthanized by exsanguination after electrical stunning. The carcass was dissected, and the weight of the carcass, hams, loins and shoulders were individually recorded at the cutting line. Carcass length and backfat thickness were also measured with a ruler. Samples of backfat and LTL were collected and stored at -20 ºC until quality meat analyses and fatty acid composition were carried out.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.3">
				<title>Analytical methods</title>

				<title><em>Nutrient analyses</em></title>

				<p>All feed and muscle analyses were performed in duplicate. Dry matter (method 934.01), total ash content (942.05) and crude fiber (962.09) were determined using official methods (AOAC, 2005). The fat content in the feeds was determined by extraction with diethyl ether according to standard procedures (AOAC, 2005). Intramuscular lipids were extracted with a chloroform/methanol mixture (1:2) according to the method described by Bligh &amp; Dyer (1959). Total nitrogen was analysed according to the Dumas procedure using a LECO Truspec CN kit (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA). The crude protein content was calculated using the factor of 6.25.</p>

				<title><em>Fatty acids analyses</em></title>

				<p>The lipids of the subcutaneous fat samples from the biopsies and the carcasses were extracted in a microwave oven following the method described by De Pedro et al. (1997). The backfat was homogenized with chloroform until the fat was completely dissolved, and then the chloroform was collected and evaporated under a stream of nitrogen. The neutral lipid fraction of intramuscular fat (IMF) from LTL was extracted by solid phase extraction according to Kaluzny et al. (1985) with the modifications proposed by Pinkart et al. (1998).</p>

				<p>The separation and quantification of fatty acids (FA) from the total lipids of backfat and from the total and neutral lipids of LTL were determined by gas chromatography according to Sandler &amp; Karo (1992). The gas chromatograph (Hewlett-Packard 4890 Series II, Hewlett-Packard, Avondale, PA, USA) was equipped with a split/splitless injector and a flame-ionisation detector. The fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were separated on a polyethylene glycol capillary column (Carbowax 20M) (30 m × 0.25 mm id × 0.25 μm film thickness) maintained at 200 ºC for 20 min. The injector and detector temperatures were 250 °C. Nitrogen was used as a carrier gas at 1.8 mL/min. Individual FAMEs were identified by comparing their retention times with those of reference standard mixtures (Sigma Chemical Co., St Louis, MO, USA). The fatty acid profile was expressed as a percentage of identified fatty acids methyl esters. The percentages of the total sums of saturated fatty acids (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA) and polyunsaturated (PUFA) were also computed.</p>

				<title><em>Water holding capacity</em></title>

				<p>Water holding capacity (WHC) was determined on LTL by three different methods. Water loss by centrifugation was determined according to the method described by Tejerina et al. (2012) and Zheng et al. (2018). Approximately 2.5 g of sample was weighed and wrapped in preweighed filter paper. The sample was then centrifuged at 4,000g for 20 min at 16 °C. After removing the sample, the filter paper was reweighed. The loss by centrifugation was calculated as the difference in weight between the initial and final weight of the filter and was expressed as the percentage of water loss with respect to the total weight. Measures were done by duplicate.</p>

				<p>For the determination of thawing loss (TL), a portion (~ 100 g) of LTL was vacuum-packed in nylon/polyethylene bags and kept frozen at -20 °C. The difference between the initial weight of the fresh sample and the final weight of the thawed samples (day 1 and 30, respectively) was used to calculate TL. Results are presented as g of water/100 g of muscle. The same samples as TL were used for the determination of cooking loss (CL). Samples of LTL were vacuum-packed in nylon/polyethylene bags and cooked by immersion at +80 °C for 45 min in a temperature-controlled water bath (Combes <em>et al.,</em> 2004). The difference in weight before and after cooking was used to calculate CL. Results are presented as a percentage.</p>

				<title><em>Instrumental texture analysis</em></title>

				<p>Warner-Bratzler (Stable Microsystems TA.XT Plus, Godalming, UK) analyses (Honikel, 1997) were performed on the same samples as previously measured cooking and thawing losses. The samples were prepared in 1 × 1 × 3 cm slices (width × length × thickness), cut with a Warner-Bratzler blade (HDP/BS) in a perpendicular direction to the muscle fibers and the maximum shear force was recorded. Instrumental determinations were repeated 8 times per sample and the replicate values were averaged.</p>

				<title><em>Instrumental color</em></title>

				<p>Instrumental color (CIE L*, a*, b*) was measured in the cross sections of LTL muscle using a Minolta Chromameter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Corp., Japan) with illuminant D65 and 0° standard observed. The colorimeter was calibrated before use with a white ceramic tile. In addition, the saturation index or chroma (C*= (a*2 + b*2)0.5), which indicates the brightness or vividness of color, and the hue angle (H° = arctg b*/a*), which describes the hue color, were also calculated. Color features were obtained as the average of 3 measurements performed at randomly selected places on each muscle.</p>

				<title><em>Myoglobin content</em></title>

				<p>The concentration of myoglobin content was assayed from the total haem content according to Hornsey (1956). In summary, 2.5 g of LTL muscle were ground in a mincer and homogenized with 10 mL of acetone and 0.25 mL of 37% HCl. After 24 h, the mixtures were filtered and the absorbance of the supernatant was detected at 512 nm against a blank using a spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Sorvall, ST16R). Results are presented as mg of myoglobin per g of muscle.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec id="sec2.4">
				<title>Statistical analyses</title>

				<p>The performance data collected during the growth period and the FA profile of the backfat samples from the biopsies were analysed with a univariate general linear model that included sex (two levels) and diet (three levels) as the only fixed effects. All the traits recorded after slaughter were analysed with the same models, but another effect was also included as a fixed factor that combined the date of slaughter and the diet batch of the individual during the fattening period (4 levels, Table 3). For the analysis of the FA profile at slaughter, the values of the same FAs at the end of the growth period were used as covariates. The weights of the premium cuts were also adjusted by the carcass weight as covariate.</p>

				<p>It was not possible to adjust the interaction between the dietary treatment during the growing period and the batch during the Montanera (12 levels) because the number of observations prevents a balanced design and the data structure resulted in missing cells. The analyses were carried out in R studio (2020) using the linear model (lm), anova and Tukey HSD functions. The Fischer test was applied to test the effects of the factors and the Tukey test to make pairwise comparisons. Differences with a p-value lower than 0.05 were considered as significant.</p>
			</sec>	

		</sec><!--/sec2-->

		<sec id="sec3" sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>

			<p>The results on performance after the growth period and on the carcass traits at slaughter are described in Table 4. Carcass weight was not modified by dietary treatments (<em>p</em> > 0.05). Not significant differences were observed for the weights of hams, shoulders and loins. Measurements of loin area and backfat depth at the last and tenth ribs at 90 kg were lower in DOP pigs (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001) but after Montanera period, backfat depths at 160 kg were very similar in the three diet groups because the depth increase between the two periods was slightly higher for the DOP group (<em>p</em> = 0.065).</p>

				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effects of two diets formulated with olive cake supplied during growth period and subsequent finishing at <em>Montanera</em> on performance of pigs and carcass trait.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">C</th>
								<th align="center">DOP</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC</th>
								<th align="center">SEM</th>
								<th align="center"><em>p</em>-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6"><strong>Growth period</strong></td>							
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Starting BW</td>
								<td align="center">41.23</td>
								<td align="center">42.77</td>
								<td align="center">41.74</td>
								<td align="center">8.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.894</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Final BW</td>
								<td align="center">94.53</td>
								<td align="center">89.86</td>
								<td align="center">100.1</td>
								<td align="center">13.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.155</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Backfat depth<sup>[1]</sup> last rib, mm</td>
								<td align="center">23.47<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">15.21<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">25.68<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Backfat depth<sup>[1]</sup> 10th rib, mm</td>
								<td align="center">26.07<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">19.39<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">30.06<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Loin area<sup>[1]</sup> last rib, cm<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">15.86<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">12.87<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">16.33<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Loin area<sup>[1]</sup> 10th rib, cm<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">17.12<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">14.12<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">18.17<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6"><strong><em>Montanera</em> period</strong></td>							
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Slaughter weight, kg</td>
								<td align="center">160.2</td>
								<td align="center">164.9</td>
								<td align="center">161.4</td>
								<td align="center">9.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.455</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Days</td>
								<td align="center">124<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">130<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">115<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">13.0</td>
								<td align="center">0.037</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Carcass weight, kg</td>
								<td align="center">126.8</td>
								<td align="center">128.6</td>
								<td align="center">127.5</td>
								<td align="center">7.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.832</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Carcass lenght, cm</td>
								<td align="center">83.08</td>
								<td align="center">85.90</td>
								<td align="center">83.86</td>
								<td align="center">2.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.136</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Backfat depth<sup>[2]</sup> last rib, mm</td>
								<td align="center">49.08</td>
								<td align="center">49.40</td>
								<td align="center">47.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.49</td>
								<td align="center">0.984</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Backfat depth<sup>[2]</sup> 10th rib, mm</td>
								<td align="center">64.60</td>
								<td align="center">63.93</td>
								<td align="center">60.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.71</td>
								<td align="center">0.789</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Δ depth<sup>[3]</sup> last rib, mm/10 days</td>
								<td align="center">2.09</td>
								<td align="center">2.80</td>
								<td align="center">1.99</td>
								<td align="center">0.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.065</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Δ depth<sup>[3]</sup> 10th rib, mm/10 days</td>
								<td align="center">3.06</td>
								<td align="center">3.46</td>
								<td align="center">2.66</td>
								<td align="center">0.72</td>
								<td align="center">0.130</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Loin weight, kg</td>
								<td align="center">2.03</td>
								<td align="center">2.17</td>
								<td align="center">2.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.312</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ham weight, kg</td>
								<td align="center">13.98</td>
								<td align="center">14.09</td>
								<td align="center">14.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.48</td>
								<td align="center">0.577</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Shoulder weight, kg</td>
								<td align="center">10.13</td>
								<td align="center">10.30</td>
								<td align="center">10.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.977</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p><sup>a-b</sup> Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences between diets (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Control (C), dry olive pulp (DOP) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC) groups. <sup>[1]</sup> Measured by ultrasound ecography. <sup>[2]</sup> Measured on the carcass with ruler. <sup>[3]</sup> Increase in subcutaneous adipose tissue depth at the last rib level every 10 days.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>					
				</table-wrap>			

			<p>Table 5 shows the mean values of the 15 fatty acids analysed from backfat biopsies at 95 kg. Significant differences were observed between the groups of treatment for most of them. The control diet (C) showed higher values for the main saturated fatty acids (ΣSFA, C14:0, C16:0, C18:0). The dry and wet diets including olive by-products (DOP and WCOC) have higher levels of unsaturated FA (ΣPUFA, C18:1, C18:2, C18:3) than C group, however, there were not many differences between them. Mean values of some low abundant FA were significantly different (C17:0, C20:1, C20:2, C20:3 n-3) between DOP and WCOC. For stearic acid (C18:0), DOP group showed lower proportions than WCOC, although the sums of FA (ΣMUFA, ΣSFA and ΣPUFA) were similar.</p>

				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effects of two diets formulated with olive cake supplied during growth period and subsequent finishing at <em>Montanera</em> on fatty acid profile (g FA/100 g of identified FA methyl esters) of subcutaneous adipose tissue from biopsies of pigs at 95 kg and slaughtered at 160 kg.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center" colspan="5">Biopsies 95 kg</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="5">Slaughtered 160 kg</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">C</th>
								<th align="center">DOP</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC</th>
								<th align="center">SEM</th>
								<th align="center"><em>p</em>-value</th>
								<th align="center">C</th>
								<th align="center">DOP</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC</th>
								<th align="center">SEM</th>
								<th align="center"><em>p</em>-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>C14:0</td>
								<td align="center">1.40<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.19<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.33<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">1.23</td>
								<td align="center">1.18</td>
								<td align="center">1.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.013</td>
								<td align="center">0.508</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:0</td>
								<td align="center">24.3<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">22.3<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">21.7<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.310</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">19.6</td>
								<td align="center">18.9</td>
								<td align="center">19.3</td>
								<td align="center">0.115</td>
								<td align="center">0.120</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:1</td>
								<td align="center">2.67<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.34<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.31<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.029</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">2.25<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.15<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.05<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
								<td align="center">0.013</td>	
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C17:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.407<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.522<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.419<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.012</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">0.302</td>
								<td align="center">0.313</td>
								<td align="center">0.301</td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
								<td align="center">0.791</td>							
							</tr>								
							<tr>
								<td>C17:1</td>
								<td align="center">0.420</td>
								<td align="center">0.410</td>
								<td align="center">0.390</td>
								<td align="center">0.008</td>
								<td align="center">0.267</td>
								<td align="center">0.358</td>
								<td align="center">0.350</td>
								<td align="center">0.319</td>
								<td align="center">0.022</td>
								<td align="center">0.239</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:0</td>
								<td align="center">11.4<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">8.88<sup>c</sup></td>
								<td align="center">10.8<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.183</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">8.40<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">7.71<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">8.61<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.088</td>
								<td align="center">0.008</td>							
							</tr>								
							<tr>
								<td>C18:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">46.6<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">49.0<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">48.2<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.369</td>
								<td align="center">0.040</td>
								<td align="center">55.4<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">56.6<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">55.4<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.142</td>
								<td align="center">0.030</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:2 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">9.43<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">11.9<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">11.1<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.165</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">8.72</td>
								<td align="center">9.22</td>
								<td align="center">9.09</td>
								<td align="center">0.099</td>
								<td align="center">0.110</td>							
							</tr>							
							<tr>
								<td>C18:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.699<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.843<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.874<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.017</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">0.783</td>
								<td align="center">0.863</td>
								<td align="center">0.775</td>
								<td align="center">0.016</td>
								<td align="center">0.108</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.234</td>
								<td align="center">0.228</td>
								<td align="center">0.232</td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
								<td align="center">0.859</td>
								<td align="center">0.199<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.179<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.206<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">1.35<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.28<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.47<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.019</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">1.68<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.55<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.72<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.026</td>
								<td align="center">0.057</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:2</td>
								<td align="center">0.625<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.641<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.725<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.012</td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
								<td align="center">0.618</td>
								<td align="center">0.573</td>
								<td align="center">0.628</td>
								<td align="center">0.010</td>
								<td align="center">0.152</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.107</td>
								<td align="center">0.121</td>
								<td align="center">0.122</td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
								<td align="center">0.460</td>
								<td align="center">0.080</td>
								<td align="center">0.072</td>
								<td align="center">0.071</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
								<td align="center">0.091</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:4 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.180</td>
								<td align="center">0.190</td>
								<td align="center">0.200</td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
								<td align="center">0.390</td>
								<td align="center">0.141</td>
								<td align="center">0.143</td>
								<td align="center">0.130</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">0.289</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.179<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.170<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.249<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">0.212</td>
								<td align="center">0.201</td>
								<td align="center">0.217</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">0.103</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩSFA</td>
								<td align="center">37.7<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">32.1<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">34.4<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.485</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">29.7<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">28.3<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">29.6<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.193</td>
								<td align="center">0.032</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩMUFA</td>
								<td align="center">51.1</td>
								<td align="center">53.0</td>
								<td align="center">52.4</td>
								<td align="center">0.384</td>
								<td align="center">0.122</td>
								<td align="center">59.7</td>
								<td align="center">60.6</td>
								<td align="center">59.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.150</td>
								<td align="center">0.114</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩPUFA</td>
								<td align="center">11.2<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">13.9<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">13.2<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.182</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
								<td align="center">10.6</td>
								<td align="center">11.1</td>
								<td align="center">10.9</td>
								<td align="center">0.120</td>
								<td align="center">0.199</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p><sup>a-b</sup> Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences between diets (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Control (C), dry olive pulp (DOP) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC) groups. ƩSFA, ƩMUFA and ƩPUFA sums of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids; respectively.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>

			<p>The results regarding backfat fatty acid profile from slaughtered pigs are also shown in Table 5. The WCOC pigs had higher content of C18:0, C20:0, C20:1 and ΣSFA (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.001 to p ≤ 0.057) and lower content of C18: 1 (<em>p</em> = 0.030) than the DOP pigs, with similar values when compared to group C except for C16:1 (<em>p</em> = 0.013). The change in the fatty acid profile from the beginning to the end of the fattening period (expressed as an increase or decrease in the percentage of fatty acids estimated every 10 days of Montanera) is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref> for the sum of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids. The decrease in ΣSFA and ΣPUFA were significantly different in the control group compared to the experimental diets, more pronounced in the first sum and less in the second.</p>

			<fig id="f2">
				<label>Figure 2</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Variation of subcutaneous adipose tissue fatty acid percentage throughout the <em>Montanera</em> period. This variation is expressed as an increase or decrease in the percentage every 10 days. ƩSFA, ƩMUFA and ƩPUFA sums of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids; respectively. Control (C), dry olive pulp (DOP) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC) groups.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic id="gra-1" xlink:href="img/e0607-fig2.jpg"/>
			</fig>

			<p>Some slight differences were found in the fatty acid profile of LTL intramuscular fat, as shown in Table 6. The contents of C18:2, C20:2, C22:3 n-3 and ΣPUFA in the total lipid fraction were higher (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) in the WCOD than in the DOP group. However, these values were not different compared to control group, except for C20:2 which showed significant differences. The differences between diets were smaller in the fraction of neutral lipids. The diet seems to modify just C18:2 and ΣPUFA contents, with higher values in WCOC than in the DOP and C groups (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.01).</p>

				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effects of two diets formulated with olive cake supplied during growth period and subsequent finishing at <em>Montanera</em> on total and neutral fatty acids profile (g FA/100 g of identified FA methyl esters) of <em>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> of pigs at 160 kg.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">C</th>
								<th align="center">DOP</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC</th>
								<th align="center">SEM</th>
								<th align="center"><em>p</em>-value</th>
							</tr>														
						</thead>
						<tbody>												
							<tr>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"><strong>Total fatty acids</strong></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C14:0</td>
								<td align="center">1.44</td>
								<td align="center">1.44</td>
								<td align="center">1.47</td>
								<td align="center">0.012</td>
								<td align="center">0.488</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:0</td>
								<td align="center">23.8</td>
								<td align="center">24.4</td>
								<td align="center">23.9</td>
								<td align="center">0.110</td>
								<td align="center">0.145</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:1</td>
								<td align="center">3.89</td>
								<td align="center">3.92</td>
								<td align="center">3.92</td>
								<td align="center">0.044</td>
								<td align="center">0.944</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C17:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.227</td>
								<td align="center">0.206</td>
								<td align="center">0.222</td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
								<td align="center">0.356</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C17:1</td>
								<td align="center">0.172</td>
								<td align="center">0.159</td>
								<td align="center">0.171</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">0.313</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:0</td>
								<td align="center">10.5</td>
								<td align="center">10.6</td>
								<td align="center">10.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.106</td>
								<td align="center">0.923</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">52.7</td>
								<td align="center">52.5</td>
								<td align="center">52.1</td>
								<td align="center">0.123</td>
								<td align="center">0.159</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:2 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">4.72<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">4.45<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.05<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.081</td>
								<td align="center">0.027</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.298<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.284<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.332<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.007</td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.268</td>
								<td align="center">0.264</td>
								<td align="center">0.276</td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
								<td align="center">0.368</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">0.861</td>
								<td align="center">0.857</td>
								<td align="center">0.900</td>
								<td align="center">0.009</td>
								<td align="center">0.254</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:2</td>
								<td align="center">0.177<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.169<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.198<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.105</td>
								<td align="center">0.097</td>
								<td align="center">0.110</td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
								<td align="center">0.166</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:4 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.802</td>
								<td align="center">0.690</td>
								<td align="center">0.783</td>
								<td align="center">0.026</td>
								<td align="center">0.193</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.060<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.059<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.068<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩSFA</td>
								<td align="center">36.2</td>
								<td align="center">36.9</td>
								<td align="center">36.4</td>
								<td align="center">0.203</td>
								<td align="center">0.491</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩMUFA</td>
								<td align="center">57.6</td>
								<td align="center">57.4</td>
								<td align="center">57.1</td>
								<td align="center">0.132</td>
								<td align="center">0.262</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩPUFA</td>
								<td align="center">6.16<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.75<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">6.54<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.110</td>
								<td align="center">0.028</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6" align="center"><strong>Neutral fatty acids</strong></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C14:0</td>
								<td align="center">1.42</td>
								<td align="center">1.41</td>
								<td align="center">1.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.016</td>
								<td align="center">0.338</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:0</td>
								<td align="center">23.2</td>
								<td align="center">23.6</td>
								<td align="center">23.1</td>
								<td align="center">0.181</td>
								<td align="center">0.480</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C16:1</td>
								<td align="center">3.98</td>
								<td align="center">4.08</td>
								<td align="center">4.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.073</td>
								<td align="center">0.671</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C17:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.433</td>
								<td align="center">0.378</td>
								<td align="center">0.427</td>
								<td align="center">0.015</td>
								<td align="center">0.286</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C17:1</td>
								<td align="center">0.495</td>
								<td align="center">0.485</td>
								<td align="center">0.502</td>
								<td align="center">0.018</td>
								<td align="center">0.941</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:0</td>
								<td align="center">9.84</td>
								<td align="center">10.02</td>
								<td align="center">9.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.141</td>
								<td align="center">0.817</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">54.7</td>
								<td align="center">54.4</td>
								<td align="center">54.3</td>
								<td align="center">0.272</td>
								<td align="center">0.843</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:2 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">3.30<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">3.15<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">3.70<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.059</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C18:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.528</td>
								<td align="center">0.506</td>
								<td align="center">0.537</td>
								<td align="center">0.022</td>
								<td align="center">0.844</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:0</td>
								<td align="center">0.337</td>
								<td align="center">0.348</td>
								<td align="center">0.381</td>
								<td align="center">0.018</td>
								<td align="center">0.587</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:1 n-9</td>
								<td align="center">1.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.97</td>
								<td align="center">1.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.023</td>
								<td align="center">0.257</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:2</td>
								<td align="center">0.282</td>
								<td align="center">0.260</td>
								<td align="center">0.233</td>
								<td align="center">0.015</td>
								<td align="center">0.423</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.180</td>
								<td align="center">0.162</td>
								<td align="center">0.161</td>
								<td align="center">0.007</td>
								<td align="center">0.558</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:4 n-6</td>
								<td align="center">0.116</td>
								<td align="center">0.106</td>
								<td align="center">0.115</td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
								<td align="center">0.660</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>C20:3 n-3</td>
								<td align="center">0.075</td>
								<td align="center">0.092</td>
								<td align="center">0.076</td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
								<td align="center">0.383</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩSFA</td>
								<td align="center">35.3</td>
								<td align="center">35.8</td>
								<td align="center">35.2</td>
								<td align="center">0.311</td>
								<td align="center">0.705</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩMUFA</td>
								<td align="center">60.2</td>
								<td align="center">59.9</td>
								<td align="center">60.0</td>
								<td align="center">0.302</td>
								<td align="center">0.928</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ƩPUFA</td>
								<td align="center">4.48<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">4.27<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">4.82<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.062</td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p><sup>a-b</sup> Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences between diets (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Control (C), dry olive pulp (DOP) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC) groups. ƩSFA, ƩMUFA and ƩPUFA sums of saturated, monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids; respectively.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>					
				</table-wrap>			

			<p>The chemical composition and quality traits of LTL muscle between groups are shown in Table 7. No significant differences were observed in chemical composition. The average values for IMF, protein, water and ash in this muscle were 5.72, 24.48, 70.08 and 1.05, respectively (expressed as g/100g). Color parameters (L *, a * and b *) and Chroma and Hue angle values were similar for pigs on WCOC and C pigs, but some differences were observed between the DOP and WCOC groups. Pigs fed the WCOC diet showed darker muscles (lower L*, <em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) and higher values of redness (a*, <em>p</em> ≤ 0.000) than muscles from DOP pigs, with clear differences between both also for the Hue angle and for Chroma (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.000). Similarly, higher myoglobin content was observed in WCOC compared to DOP pigs (2.0 vs 1.7 mg/g, <em>p</em> ≤ 0.05), while C pigs showed intermediate values (1.9 mg/g). In the remaining quality traits analysed, the WCOC muscles had lower water losses due to thawing (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) than the DOP, while the losses due to cooking and centrifugal force were lower for WCOC, but the differences were not statistically significant. Higher centrifugal losses were observed in C compared to WCOC loins (<em>p</em> ≤ 0.05) and no significant effect of dietary treatment for shear force measurements.</p>


				<table-wrap id="t7">
					<label>Table 7</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effects of two diets formulated with olive cake supplied during growth period and subsequent finishing at <em>Montanera</em> on chemical composition (g/100 g) and quality traits of <em>longissimus thoracis et lumborum</em> muscle of pigs at 160 kg BW.</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center"></th>
								<th align="center">C</th>
								<th align="center">DOP</th>
								<th align="center">WCOC</th>
								<th align="center">SEM</th>
								<th align="center"><em>p</em>-value</th>
							</tr>															
						</thead>
						<tbody>												
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6"><strong>Chemical composition</strong></td>								
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Water</td>
								<td align="center">68.7</td>
								<td align="center">69.1</td>
								<td align="center">69.7</td>
								<td align="center">0.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.219</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Protein</td>
								<td align="center">24.5</td>
								<td align="center">24.0</td>
								<td align="center">23.9</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.148</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Intramuscular fat</td>
								<td align="center">5.74</td>
								<td align="center">5.86</td>
								<td align="center">5.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.573</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ash</td>
								<td align="center">1.02</td>
								<td align="center">1.03</td>
								<td align="center">1.07</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.179</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6"><strong>Colour parameters</strong></td>								
							</tr>							
							<tr>
								<td>L*</td>
								<td align="center">40.9<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">43.5<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">40.6<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.026</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>a*</td>
								<td align="center">11.0<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">8.95<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">10.5<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>b*</td>
								<td align="center">6.28</td>
								<td align="center">6.39</td>
								<td align="center">6.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.23</td>
								<td align="center">0.837</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Hue angle</td>
								<td align="center">29.8<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">35.5<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">30.8<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.51</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Chroma</td>
								<td align="center">12.7<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">11.0<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">12.2<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Myoglobin, mg/g muscle</td>
								<td align="center">1.93<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.68<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">2.00<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.018</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="6"><strong>Water holding capacity and instrumental texture analysis WSSF<sup>[1]</sup></strong></td>								
							</tr>							
							<tr>
								<td>Thawing loss %</td>
								<td align="center">6.43<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">7.05<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">5.28<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
								<td align="center">0.042</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Cooking loss %</td>
								<td align="center">24.1</td>
								<td align="center">23.2</td>
								<td align="center">22.1</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.078</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Centrifugal force loss %</td>
								<td align="center">32.9<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">30.4<sup>ab</sup></td>
								<td align="center">29.0<sup>b</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.49</td>
								<td align="center">0.015</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Shear force <sup>[1]</sup> (kg)</td>
								<td align="center">4.22</td>
								<td align="center">3.78</td>
								<td align="center">3.84</td>
								<td align="center">0.26</td>
								<td align="center">0.433</td>
							</tr>							
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p><sup>a-b</sup> Different superscripts in the same row indicate significant differences between diets (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). Control (C), dry olive pulp (DOP) and wet crude olive cake (WCOC) groups. <sup>[1]</sup> Warner–Bratzler shear force.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>					
				</table-wrap>

		</sec><!--sec3 -->
			
		<sec id="sec4" sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>

				<p>In the traditional production system of the Iberian pig that establishes the exploitation of the natural resources of the Montanera, a long period of time must be applied with a strong feed restriction to achieve an adequate size and body composition but with low fat content. The recent legal requirements that regulate the breeding conditions determine that Iberian pigs must be at least 12 months old and around 100 kg BW ±10 kg at the beginning of Montanera period. The Iberian pig has a high intake capacity (Lopez-Bote, 1998) thus this feed restriction prolonged over time could create anxiety to the animals. Among the several alternatives proposed to solve this negative effect on animal welfare, this study has evaluated the increase of the ration using agricultural by-products with high fiber content.</p>

				<p>It is worth to highlight the complexity of including this type of by-products in pig´s feeding, due to the need to find an adequate form of administration. The olive pulp was dehydrated and therefore was included in a compound feed (DOP_CF). Olive pulp by-product corresponded to 45% of compound fed, the straw was 25%, and a 15.3% was made up of soybeans, which represented 51.8% of the compound feed without by-products. In the case of the crude olive cake, it was mixed with straw to transform it into a suitable raw material that could be used to fed pigs. In this case, the silage would contribute a 70% of the total intake of dry matter, the remaining 30% was provided by the feed supplied as a complement (WCOC_CF). Therefore, this feed had a 50% of soybean meal. The initial idea was that both diets were similar in the contribution of nutritional principles, but each one had different by-product and supplementation form.</p>

				<p>The effects on growth and carcass performance and meat quality of two presentations of the olive oil industry by-products, in dry olive pulp and wet crude olive cake, were analysed and compared with a usual control diet (C).</p>

				<p>In a previous work (García-Casco <em>et al.,</em> 2017), although individual feed intake measures were not available, it was found that growth was different between diet groups but the final slaughter weight were similar. The average growth during the growing period was higher in the group of pigs fed the WCOC compared to the fed the DOP diet. But during the Montanera the DOP pigs reached the commercial slaughter weight almost at the same time as the control group and shortly after the WCOC pigs, within the usual timeframes for this type of fattening. Growth between both periods was finally balanced and, therefore, no important differences were observed between the dietary treatments. Also, there were less fat deposition in the backfat tissue and a smaller loin area in the DOP than the WCOC and C groups at the end of the growth period. However, in DOP group, the modification that had to be made in the ration supplied during the first weeks (from <em>ad libitum</em> to restriction at 60%), could affect these results. In any case, the lower backfat thickness disappeared after the fattening period, since the thicknesses were similar at slaughter. This compensatory effect was not reflected in a greater weight of the lean tissues since no significant differences were observed in the premium cuts.</p>

				<p>The backfat fatty acid profile is one of the main determinants of the organoleptic properties associated with dry-cured Iberian pig products. The processing industries demand a minimum of 53% oleic acid and low values for palmitic (&lt;22%), stearic (&lt;10.5%) and linoleic (&lt;10.5%) acids at slaughter (BOE, 2007). For this reason, the farmer must control the FA profile before the Montanera by providing adequate diets. High SFA levels resulting from some growth diets may not be changed with acorn feeding during Montanera and, therefore, the final quality of the products may be affected. The pre-Montanera feed formulation used for Iberian pigs takes this situation into account and many of them have a high oleic acid content obtained from raw materials such as sunflower seeds. In our study, the animals consumed different amounts of dietary fat with different fatty acid profiles. For those fed the DOP and C diets, a restricted feeding regime was implemented. Pigs fed the DOP diet consumed more fat and richer in oleic acid and MUFA than the control group. The WCOC group consumed a compound feed (WCOC_CF) rich in PUFA and low in oleic acid, but <em>ad libitum</em> consumption of the crude olive cake by-product increased their oleic acid intake and <em>de novo</em> oleic acid deposition. In general, similar FA backfat composition was observed between the diets consumed by the pigs containing olive by-products at 95 kg, but they were different from those fed the control diet. At the end of the growth period, the animals fed with DOP and WCOC diets presented a backfat profile rich in oleic acid and in the essential fatty acids linoleic and linolenic and with lower proportion of SFA compared to the control diet. These observations partially agree with previous findings that reported differences in the backfat fatty acid profile in Alentejano pigs (Martins <em>et al.,</em> 2017), a Portuguese breed very close to the Iberian (Muñoz <em>et al.,</em> 2018), which were fed with high or low oleic acid feeds in a free-range system. According to Wood et al. (1989), as backfat depth increases, the concentrations of SFA and C18:1 increase and those of C18:2 and C18:3 decrease. In part, this is because the essential FAs come exclusively from the diet and they cannot be synthesized <em>de novo</em>, therefore, the pigs of the WCOC group, fed with enough crude olive cake by-product, have similar proportions of PUFA, SFA and MUFA than those fed the DOP diet, despite the fact that the backfat depth at 95 kg was 41% thicker in the WCOC than in the DOP group.</p>

				<p>At the end of the Montanera period, the values of the fatty acids sums ranged from 28.3% to 29.7% for SFA, from 59.5% to 60.6% for MUFA and from 10.6% to 11.1% for PUFA, with minor statistical differences between the diet groups. These values were different from other studies as Niñoles et al. (2007), that showed lower levels of MUFA and PUFA, but closer to those reported by Hernández-Matamoros (2014). In general terms, the differences observed in the FA profile during the growth period were compensated after the fattening period in the free-range regime. The differences in proportions of the four most abundant FAs found at the end of the growth period of diet C with respect to the DOP and WCOC groups, were equalled after the fattening period. Even slightly higher proportions of oleic acid and lower of saturated fatty acids sum were observed at the end of this period in pigs fed the DOP diet. Therefore, the inclusion of olive by-products in the diets maintains the proportions of SFA and MUFA within the desired limits, without an increase in PUFA that usually causes oxidation and rancidity problems in the processed products.</p>

				<p>The proportions of fatty acids change as the fat content of the tissues increases (Wood <em>et al.,</em> 2008), linked to an increase in C18:1 and MUFA due to the raising of lipogenesis and the decrease in C18:2 and C18:3 by a declining of the direct incorporation from the diet of these essential fatty acids. In the present study, it is noteworthy the lower proportion of PUFA in the loin of pigs fed DOP group comparing with the other two, probably reflecting the lower linoleic and linolenic acid content provided by the DOP diet that the Montanera period is not able to balance. Despite the different lipid profile and fat content of the growth diets, IMF, SFA and MUFA of LTL muscle were similar at slaughter. Martins et al. (2015, 2017) explored the effect of a diet supplemented with oleic acid in 100 kg BW pigs and found changes in the neutral lipid fraction of muscles such as LTL, <em>semimembranosus</em> and <em>biceps femoris</em>, with higher proportions of MUFA and PUFA. However, the IMF percentage did not change. Other authors have previously reported significant differences in the percentage of FA of Iberian pigs fed diets with different saturated and unsaturated fatty acid levels (Cava <em>et al.,</em> 1997; Andres <em>et al.,</em> 2001). Although in the present experiment there is an absence of data recorded on the muscles at the end of the growth period, feeding during the Montanera period most likely balances the effects on the fatty acid profile caused by the experimental diets supplied during the growth period.</p>

				<p>The experimental diets had little effect on the chemical composition of the LTL muscle. A positive relationship between the tenderness or the acceptability of pork by the consumers and the IMF content have been described (Fonti-Furnols <em>et al.,</em> 2011) and a IMF percentage lower than 2.5% negatively affects to the acceptability parameters. A drop in the percentage of IMF in lambs fed olive cake has been observed (Mioc <em>et al.,</em> 2007) despite the high fat intake provided in the diet. However, those used in the present study did not affect the IMF content in the LTL of the Iberian pig. The values obtained with the by-product diets were similar to the control diet and to those described in other studies (Tejerina <em>et al.,</em> 2012). Hence, the experimental diets did not modify this relevant meat quality trait.</p>

				<p>Meat color is the first sensory characteristic of pork quality and it is considered a direct determinant of consumer preferences and purchase decisions (Needham &amp; Hoffman, 2015). The results obtained in the color parameters showed that LTL from pigs fed the DOP diet present a different color pattern (especially for a*, Hue and Chroma) than the control and WCOC groups. The differences in redness need attention, since red-cherry color makes the meat more attractive for producers and consumers (Straadt <em>et al.,</em> 2013). These results partially agree with those obtained by Joven et al. (2014), who observed changes in meat color in pigs fed increasing amounts of olive cake in the diet. The red color in the muscles is directly related to the presence of the myoglobin pigment. Accordingly, pigs fed WCOC and C diets showed a higher myoglobin content in LTL. The relationship between the red color and the IMF content or even the IMF fatty acid profile, specifically with the MUFA levels, pointed out in other studies (Palma-Granados <em>et al.,</em> 2017; Nieto <em>et al.,</em> 2019) has not been confirmed by these results.</p>

				<p>WHC has a great influence on the sensory traits of meat such as color, juiciness, and tenderness (Tejerina <em>et al.,</em> 2012), in addition to its economic and nutritional implications. The previous data available in more commercial and widespread pig breeds have not described any effect due to the inclusion of olive cake in the diet on water retention capacity and tenderness (Joven <em>et al.,</em> 2014). However, in this study, small differences in meat water losses between dietary treatments have been observed. In general, the greatest differences were observed between animals from DOP and WCOC groups, with greater water losses in the first one. Furthermore, since WHC and color are closely related (Seiquer <em>et al.,</em> 2019), the meat of DOP pigs shows signs of being paler and less red. Again, the negative relationship reported by other authors between IMF and water losses related to a higher moisture content (Gjerlaug-Enger <em>et al.,</em> 2010) as well as meat hardness (Ramírez &amp; Cava, 2007; Lorenzo &amp; Carballo, 2015) have not been observed in the present work.</p>

				<p>In addition to the few differences found in performance and meat quality traits between the experimental and control groups, some explanation regarding practical concerns is needed. The huge variability of the raw material used in this study is a complicated problem to solve. Previous works describe the high variability in the chemical composition of the olive cake due to the oil extraction process, the year and geographical origin of the olives, or the posterior processing out such as drying or pitting (Molina-Alcaide <em>et al.,</em> 2003). The diet must be formulated for a specific raw material, and reformulation could be necessary even in the same pre-Montanera period. The WCOC group was fed straw and ensilage whose composition also changes seasonally. Moreover, the difficulty increases because it is not possible to know in advance the composition of the diet based on acorn and grass. The acorn composition changes depending on a series of uncontrollable external parameters (weather, parasites, etc.) that vary from year to year and even in the same Montanera period (Tejerina <em>et al.,</em> 2011). Another concern was the amount of the DOP ration supplied, since in a first moment, it was intended to be supplied <em>ad libitum</em>, however, excessive and unwanted fattening of the animals was observed. Therefore, a restriction on the diet supplied had to be decided during the experiment. A new ration adjustment should be studied in the future to find out if this by-product could be a viable option. Regarding the WCOC group, the lack of a current market makes its preparation difficult and expensive. However, the raw material used is cheap, and it also represents a notable improvement in the sustainability of olive oil production, since it would contribute to solve, in part, the problem of the management and processing of secondary waste from its extraction. The cost of these feeds is a point that must be taken into account, therefore further studies on the cost/benefits of the feeds should be carried out.</p>

				<p>The use of a diet based on by-products from olive oil extraction has two important aspects to be considered, as mentioned above, the sustainability of the agricultural environment, and the improvement of animal welfare. Although an animal welfare study has not been properly carried out in our work, other authors have evaluated Iberian pigs fed with rice husk (which is a rice by-product) using the Welfare Quality© test and they obtained favorable results (Matías <em>et al.,</em> 2018). According to the conclusion of their work, the high proportion of fiber in the rice husk had a satiating effect on the animals, causing a positive emotional state. In our case, the field observations evidenced a less noisy and nervous behavior when the daily ration of the group fed the WCOC diet was supplied. Thus, continued access to feed in a silage form seems to reduce anxiety produced by the restriction regime.</p>

				<p>In conclusion, the use of by-products from the olive industry in feeding of the Iberian pigs during the growth period before the Montanera, does not substantially alter either the growth, carcass composition or meat quality traits. However, the supplementation of olive cake in its dry presentation has shown slight negative effects on some quality parameters (color, water losses or the fatty acid profile in the loin) that should be evaluated in greater depth. A further investigation of by-products effects on sensory traits would be useful before its potential use in pig feeding in order to ensure the maintenance of the high organoleptic quality associated to Iberian pig meat products. By-product supplementation in silage form does not produce any negative effect on quality and could reduce the welfare problems derived from the strong dietary restriction necessary in this type of production. Its use in feeding Iberian pigs in extensive systems, at the expense of adequate economic studies, could be highly recommended.</p>
			
			</sec><!--/sec4 -->				
	</body>

	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors would like to thank the staff of the Puerto Lobo farm for their dedication and cooperation and, above all, to its owner, Francisco B. Ramírez, for making it available to us to carry out the experiment. </p>
		</ack>			
		<author-notes>
			<title>Author's Contributions</title>
			<fn>Conceptualization: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Formal analysis: A. López-García, E. González-Sánchez, M. Muñoz, P. Palma-Granados.</fn>
			<fn>Funding acquisition: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Investigation: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco, A. López-García, M.A. Fernández-Barroso, J.M. Martínez-Torres.</fn>
			<fn>Methodology: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Project administration: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Resources: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Supervision: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco.</fn>
			<fn>Visualization: M. Muñoz, P. Palma-Granados.</fn>
			<fn>Writing – original draft: J.M. García-Casco, P. Palma-Granados.</fn>
			<fn>Writing – review &amp; editing: E. González-Sánchez, J.M. García-Casco, M. Muñoz, P. Palma-Granados.</fn>
		</author-notes>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Alburquerque</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>González</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cegarra</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Agrochemical characterisation of “alperujo”, a solid by-product of the two-phase centrifugation method for olive oil extraction.</article-title>
					<source>Bioresour Technol</source>
					<issue>91</issue>
					<fpage>195</fpage>
					<lpage>200</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00177-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(03)00177-9</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Andres</surname>
							<given-names>AI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mayoral</surname>
							<given-names>AI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tejeda</surname>
							<given-names>JF</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Morcuende</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Oxidative stability and fatty acid composition of pig muscles as affected by rearing system, crossbreeding and metabolic type of muscle fibre.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>39</fpage>
					<lpage>47</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00050-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00050-X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>AOAC</surname>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.</article-title>
					<publisher>AOAC International</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Maryland, USA.</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Benito</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vazquez-Cisneros</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Menaya</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ferrera</surname>
							<given-names>JL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Romero</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Garcia-Casco</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Utilización del alperujo de aceituna como suplemento de la ración en el cerdo ibérico de primor.</article-title>
					<source>Solo Cerdo Ibérico</source>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>45</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bligh</surname>
							<given-names>EG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Dyer</surname>
							<given-names>WJ</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>1959</year>
					<article-title>A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification.</article-title>
					<source>Can J Biochem Physiol</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>911</fpage>
					<lpage>917</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099">https://doi.org/10.1139/o59-099</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>BOE</surname>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Order APA / 3653/2007, of 13 December, which publishes the fatty acid values applicable to the “Acorn” and “Recebo” food designations, for the 2007-2008 campaign.</article-title>
					<source>Boletín Oficial del Estado (Spain), BOE-A-2007-21601.</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2007/12/13/apa3653">https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2007/12/13/apa3653</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>BOE</surname>
						</string-name>							
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Royal decree 4/2014, of 10 January, by which the quality standard for meat, ham, shoulder and cane of Iberian loin is approved.</article-title>
					<source>Boletín oficial del Estado (Spain), BOE-A-2014-318.</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2014/01/10/4">https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2014/01/10/4</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>López-Bote</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martín</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ventanas</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Antequera</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Influence of finishing diet on fatty acid profiles of intramuscular lipids, triglycerides and phospholipids in muscles of the Iberian pig.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>263</fpage>
					<lpage>270</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00102-7">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00102-7</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Combes</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lepetit</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Darche</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lebas</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Effect of cooking temperature and cooking time on Warner-Bratzler tenderness measurement and collagen content in rabbit meat.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>66</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>91</fpage>
					<lpage>96</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00019-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00019-6</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Davidson</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>The Oxford companion to food, 3rd ed.</article-title>
					<publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Oxford, UK</publisher-loc>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199677337.001.0001">https://doi.org/10.1093/acref/9780199677337.001.0001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>De Blas</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mateos</surname>
							<given-names>GG</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Rebollar</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>									
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos,  3rd ed.</article-title>
					<publisher>Fundación Española para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal</publisher>					
					<publisher-loc>Madrid, Spain</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>De Miguel</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hoekstra</surname>
							<given-names>AY</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Calvo</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Sustainability of the water footprint of the Spanish pork industry.</article-title>
					<source>Ecol Ind</source>
					<issue>57</issue>
					<fpage>465</fpage>
					<lpage>474</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.023">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.023</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>De Pedro</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Casillas</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Miranda</surname>
							<given-names>CM</given-names>
						</string-name>																	
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Microwave oven application in the extraction of fat from the subcutaneous tissue of Iberian pig ham.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>45</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00097-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(96)00097-6</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fonti-Furnols</surname>
							<given-names>MF</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Realini</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Montossi</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sañudo</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Campo</surname>
							<given-names>MM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Oliver</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																									
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Consumer’s purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom.</article-title>
					<source>Food Qual Prefer</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>443</fpage>
					<lpage>451</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Casco</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Muñoz</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martínez-Torres</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-López</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernández-Barroso</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>González-Sánchez</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Alternative feeding in Iberian pigs during growth period: incorporation of olive cake in a dry or wet (silage) form.</article-title>
					<source>Agric Conspec Sci</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>147</fpage>
					<lpage>150</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Gjerlaug-Enger</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aass</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Odegard</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vangen</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</string-name>											
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Genetic parameters of meat quality traits in two pig breeds measured by rapid methods.</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>1832</fpage>
					<lpage>1843</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111000114X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111000114X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>González-Sánchez</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernández-Barroso</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Caraballo</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Garcia-Casco</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Alimentación del cerdo ibérico con alperujo durante la recría.</article-title>
					<source>I Congreso Ibérico de Olivicultura, Badajoz (Spain)</source>
					<date>April 13-16</date>
					<fpage>451</fpage>
					<lpage>454</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hernandez-Matamoros</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Paniagua-Brena</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Izquierdo-Cebrian</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tejeda-Sereno</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>González-Sánchez</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Use of olive cake and tomato peel in the Iberian pig feed.</article-title>
					<source>XIV Jornadas sobre Producción Animal, Zaragoza (Spain)</source>
					<date>May 17-18</date>
					<fpage>276</fpage>
					<lpage>278</lpage>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hernández-Matamoros</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Aportaciones al estudio de la caracterización de los sistemas de alimentación del cerdo ibérico.</article-title>
					<source>Doctoral Thesis</source>
					<publisher>Extremadura University</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Badajoz, Spain.</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Honikel</surname>
							<given-names>KO</given-names>
						</string-name>																																															
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Reference methods supported by OECD and their use in Mediterranean meat products.</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>573</fpage>
					<lpage>582</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00002-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(97)00002-2</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hornsey</surname>
							<given-names>HC</given-names>
						</string-name>																														
					</person-group>
					<year>1956</year>
					<article-title>The colour of cooked cured pork. I. Estimation of the nitric oxide‐Haem pigments.</article-title>
					<source>J Sci Food Agric</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>534</fpage>
					<lpage>540</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740070804">https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740070804</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>	
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Joven</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pintos</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Latorre</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Suárez-Belloch</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Guada</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fondevila</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																											
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Effect of replacing barley by increasing levels of olive cake in the diet of finishing pigs: Growth performances, digestibility, carcass, meat and fat quality.</article-title>
					<source>Anim Feed Sci Technol</source>
					<issue>197</issue>
					<fpage>185</fpage>
					<lpage>193</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.08.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.08.007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kaluzny</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Duncan</surname>
							<given-names>LA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Merrit</surname>
							<given-names>MV</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Epps</surname>
							<given-names>DE</given-names>
						</string-name>																													
					</person-group>
					<year>1985</year>
					<article-title>Rapid separation of lipid classes in high yield and purity using bonded phase columns.</article-title>
					<source>J Lipid Res</source>
					<issue>26</issue>
					<fpage>135</fpage>
					<lpage>140</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34412-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34412-6</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lopez-Bote</surname>
							<given-names>CJ</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Sustained utilization of the Iberian pig breed.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<issue>49</issue>
					<fpage>17</fpage>
					<lpage>27</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00072-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00072-2</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lorenzo</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Carballo</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Changes in physicochemical properties and volatile compounds throughout the manufacturing process of dry-cured foal loin.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<issue>99</issue>
					<fpage>44</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Neves</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tirapicos</surname>
							<given-names>JL</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Rearing system and oleic acid supplementation effect on carcass and lipid characteristics of two muscles from an obese pig breed.</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>10</issue>
					<fpage>1721</fpage>
					<lpage>1730</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111500066X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111500066X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Albuquerque</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Neves</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>AB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Charneca</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tirapicos</surname>
							<given-names>JL</given-names>
						</string-name>																																											
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Influence of outdoor rearing and oleic acid supplementation on lipid characteristics of muscle and adipose tissues from obese Alentejano pigs.</article-title>
					<source>J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr</source>
					<volume>102</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>e578</fpage>
					<lpage>e590</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12799">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12799</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Matías</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>González</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Gudiño</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hernández-García</surname>
							<given-names>FI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Izquierdo</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>																	
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Use of rice husk in Iberian pigs during the pre-montanera period for welfare diets. Preliminary results.</article-title>
					<source>Arch Zoot</source>
					<volume>68</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>37</fpage>
					<lpage>40</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v67iSupplement.3568">https://doi.org/10.21071/az.v67iSupplement.3568</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Mioc</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pavic</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vnucec</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Prpic</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kostelic</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Susic</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</string-name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Effect of olive cake on daily gain, carcass characteristics and chemical composition of lamb meat.</article-title>
					<source>Czech J Anim Sci</source>
					<volume>52</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>31</fpage>
					<lpage>36</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17221/2261-CJAS">https://doi.org/10.17221/2261-CJAS</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30"> 
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Molina-Alcaide</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nefzaoui</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>																		
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Recicling of olive oil by-products: possibility of utilization in animal nutrition.</article-title>
					<source>Int Biodeter Biodegr</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<issue>3-4</issue>
					<fpage>227</fpage>
					<lpage>235</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(96)00055-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(96)00055-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Molina-Alcaide</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yáñez-Ruíz</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Moumen</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Martín-García</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>																						
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Chemical composition and nitrogen availability for goats and sheep of some olive by-products.</article-title>
					<source>Small Rumin Res</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>329</fpage>
					<lpage>336</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00148-2">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00148-2</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32"> 
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Molina-Alcaide</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yáñez-Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>DR</given-names>
						</string-name>																								
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Potential use of olive by-products in ruminant feeding: A review.</article-title>
					<source>Anim Feed Sci Technol</source>
					<volume>147</volume>
					<issue>1-3</issue>
					<fpage>247</fpage>
					<lpage>264</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.021">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.09.021</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Muñoz</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bozzi</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Núñez</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Geraci</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Crovetti</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>																																		
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Diversity across major and candidate genes in European local pig breeds.</article-title>
					<source>Plos One</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>30</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207475">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207475</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Needham</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hoffman</surname>
							<given-names>LC</given-names>
						</string-name>																													
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Physical meat quality and chemical composition of the Longissimus thoracis of entire and immunocastrated pigs fed varying dietary protein levels with and without ractopamine hydrochloride.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<issue>110</issue>
					<fpage>101</fpage>
					<lpage>108</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.06.017</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nieto</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Casco</surname>
							<given-names>JM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lara</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Palma-Granados</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Izquierdo</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hernández</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Ibérico (Iberian) Pig.</article-title>
					<source>In: European local pig breeds - Diversity and performance. A study of project TREASURE.</source>
					<fpage>115</fpage>
					<lpage>139</lpage>
					<publisher>IntechOpen</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83765">https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.83765</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Niñoles</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Clemente</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ventanas</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Benedito</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</string-name>																							
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Quality assessment of Iberian pigs through backfat ultrasound characterization and fatty acid composition.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>102</fpage>
					<lpage>111</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.018">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.10.018</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Palma-Granados</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Haro</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lara</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aguilera</surname>
							<given-names>JF</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nieto</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seiquer</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Differences on meat colour and composition between ‘Landrace× Large White’ and ‘Iberian’ pigs under identical nutritional and management conditions.</article-title>
					<source>Anim Prod Sci</source>
					<volume>58</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>2132</fpage>
					<lpage>2142</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16375">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16375</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Pinkart</surname>
							<given-names>HC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Devereux</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Chapman</surname>
							<given-names>PJ</given-names>
						</string-name>						
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Rapid separation of microbial lipids using solid phase extraction columns.</article-title>
					<source>J Microbiol Methods</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>9</fpage>
					<lpage>15</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00060-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(98)00060-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Ramírez</surname>
							<given-names>MR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Effect of Iberian× Duroc genotype on dry-cured loin quality.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>333</fpage>
					<lpage>341</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.11.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.11.017</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Preston</surname>
							<given-names>TR</given-names>
						</string-name>												
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Local feed resources and indigenous breeds: fundamental issues in integrated farming systems.</article-title>
					<source>FAO Electronic Conference: Livestock feed resources within integrated farming systems.</source>
					<date>1996/97</date>
					<publisher>FAO</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>RStudio</surname>
						</string-name>																							
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Integrated Development for R. RStudio</article-title>
					<publisher>PBC</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>Boston, MA, USA.</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sandler</surname>
							<given-names>SR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Karo</surname>
							<given-names>W</given-names>
						</string-name>																	
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Sourcebook of advanced organic laboratory preparations, 1st ed.</article-title>
					<publisher>Academic Press</publisher>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Seiquer</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Palma-Granados</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Haro</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lara</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Lachica</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fernández-Fígares</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nieto</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>																																															
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Meat quality traits in longissimus lumborum and gluteus medius muscles from immunocastrated and surgically castrated Iberian pigs.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<issue>150</issue>
					<fpage>77</fpage>
					<lpage>84</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.12.004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Straadt</surname>
							<given-names>IK</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Aaslyng</surname>
							<given-names>MD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Bertram</surname>
							<given-names>HC</given-names>
						</string-name>																																			
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Sensory and consumer evaluation of pork loins from crossbreeds between Danish Landrace, Yorkshire, Duroc, Iberian and Mangalitza.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>35</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.026">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.026</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tejerina</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Torres</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>de Vaca</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vázquez</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>																																														
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Acorns (<em>Quercus rotundifolia</em> Lam.) and grass as natural sources of antioxidants and fatty acids in the “montanera” feeding of Iberian pig: Intra-and inter-annual variations.</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem</source>
					<volume>124</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>997</fpage>
					<lpage>1004</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.058">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.07.058</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Tejerina</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>García-Torres</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>de Vaca</surname>
							<given-names>MC</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Vázquez</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Cava</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																			
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Effect of production system on physical-chemical, antioxidant and fatty acids composition of Longissimus dorsi and Serratus ventralis muscles from Iberian pig.</article-title>
					<source>Food Chem</source>
					<volume>133</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>293</fpage>
					<lpage>299</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.025">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.025</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wood</surname>
							<given-names>JD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Enser</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Whittington</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Moncrieff</surname>
							<given-names>CB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Kempster</surname>
							<given-names>AJ</given-names>
						</string-name>																																																						
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>
					<article-title>Backfat composition in pigs: differences between fat thickness groups and sexes.</article-title>
					<source>Livest Prod Sci</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<issue>3-4</issue>
					<fpage>351</fpage>
					<lpage>362</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90066-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(89)90066-3</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47"> 
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Wood</surname>
							<given-names>JD</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Enser</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Fisher</surname>
							<given-names>AV</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Nute</surname>
							<given-names>GR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Sheard</surname>
							<given-names>PR</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Richardson</surname>
							<given-names>RI</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Hughes</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Whittington</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</string-name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Fat deposition, fatty acid composition and meat quality: A review.</article-title>
					<source>Meat Sci</source>
					<volume>78</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>343</fpage>
					<lpage>358</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.019</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>HB</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>MY</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>HJ</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>XL</given-names>
						</string-name>
						<string-name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>GH</given-names>
						</string-name>																
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>The effect of pressure-assisted heating on the water holding capacity of chicken batters.</article-title>
					<source>Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol</source>
					<issue>45</issue>
					<fpage>280</fpage>
					<lpage>286</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.11.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2017.11.011</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>														
		</ref-list>			
	</back>
</article>