This study was conducted to determine the usability of some clonal rootstocks of apple (MM 106 and MM 111), pear (Fox 11), and quince (Quince A) for hawthorn trees propagation.
Area of study:
Fruit Research Institute, Isparta and Hatay Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Türkiye.
Material and methods:
‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar was budded on the following clonal rootstocks: pear Fox 11, quince A, and apple MM 106 and MM 111. Plants of hawthorn seedlings (Crataegus azarolus L.) budded with ‘Sultan’ cv. were used as control. External visual diagnosis of the scion-rootstock graft combinations was performed by observing visual symptoms in budded trees growing in nursery conditions, as well as anatomic and histological investigations of the incompatibility in the laboratory.
Main results:
In this study, healthy scion development and callus tissue in the graft region were formed in the seedling rootstock as well as on Fox11 and Quince A clonal rootstocks. In contrast, MM 106 and MM 111 apple rootstocks showed incompatibility symptoms, with insufficient scion vigor and unstructured callus tissue development.
Research highlights:
‘Tanslocated’ and ‘located’ graft incompatibility symptoms were observed in Sultan/MM 106 and Sultan/MM 111 combinations. Further studies are necessary to confirm the early good compatibility found in nursery conditions, testing the effect of those clonal rootstocks from different species (Fox11 and Quince A) on vigor, yield, and fruit quality traits in orchard conditions.
clonal rootstock;histology;vigor;translocated incompatibility;localized incompatibility;The authors received no specific funding for this work.Introduction
Türkiye is one of the origin areas of hawthorn and contains more than 30 hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) in different ecological regions. These regions have at least one primary species and other secondary or several common species with local genotypes (Ercisli et al., 2015; Caliskan et al., 2016; Donmez & Ozderin, 2019). The hawthorn fruits are commonly consumed either in fresh or processed form such as juice and jam, due to their characteristic flavor (astringent, sweet, and floral). In addition, a high content of several macro-and micro-elements, and beneficial effects on health have been reported (Gundogdu et al., 2014; Caliskan, 2015; Wu et al., 2020). The ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar (Crataegus azarolus L.) has been successfully released due to its large fruit, high eating quality, and rich aroma compounds (Çalışkan et al., 2018; Dursun et al., 2021), reaching high prices in the local markets. It is grown in regular orchards for fresh fruit consumption in the eastern Mediterranean region of Türkiye, and new orchards are currently established with this cultivar in different regions of Türkiye.
Many hawthorn species are grown for their edible fruits in Asia (Guo & Jiao, 1995; Li et al., 2015), Central and South USA (Payne & Krewer, 1990; Velasco-Hernández et al., 2017), and the Mediterranean countries (Bahri-Sahloul et al., 2009; Caliskan et al., 2016; Issaadi et al., 2020). Similarly, the hawthorn species with medicinal value and high fruit quality cause an increase in hawthorn cultivation in those areas. However, one of the most important limiting factors for hawthorn tree cultivation is propagation. Vegetative propagation of hawthorns by cuttings is not a useful technique because of their poor rooting ability. Similarly, difficulties in germination due to the seed coat thickness and deep dormancy in seedling rootstock production, slow growth of plants after germination, and a prolonged juvenile period due to its heterozygote genetic structure, are also important problems for hawthorn propagation and cultivation (Bayazıt et al., 2018; Çalışkan et al., 2020). Nevertheless, grafting onto seedling rootstocks is mainly used for the propagation of hawthorns (Hartmann et al., 2002). In fact, Caliskan & Karaman (2018) showed that whip grafting onto hawthorn seedling rootstock is highly successful in March and April months in the ecological conditions of the Eastern Mediterranean region of Türkiye. Propagation by seeds (Çalışkan et al., 2020) or tissue culture (Nas et al., 2012) could be preferred for rootstock production, but it takes at least 2 or 3 years for producing a young tree to be grafted and planted in orchard conditions. Until now, there is no detailed research on the determination of a specific clonal rootstock allowing clonal propagation of hawthorn trees.
Hummer & Janick (2009) mentioned that hawthorn species could be closely related to the genera Pyrus, Cydonia, and Malus. Therefore, investigating the suitability of the available clonal rootstocks from these species could be considered a very interesting strategy for the spread of cultivation of hawthorn trees. It is commonly accepted that the greater is the taxonomic distance between the rootstock and scion, the chance of successful graft union decreases (Flaishman et al., 2008). Interspecific grafting between rootstock and scion belonging to different species of the same genus, can be compatible in certain cases but intrafamilial grafts are rarely compatible (Andrews & Marquez, 2010; Goldschmidt, 2014). Furthermore, successful examples of good graft compatibility between different species are well known in peach/plum (Zarrouk et al., 2010), pear/quince (Espen et al., 2005; Machado et al., 2016), apricot/plum (Reig et al., 2018a; Gür et al., 2020), and European and Japanese plums on peach × almond hybrids and different plum species (Reig et al., 2018b, 2019) graft-combinations.
Graft compatibility or incompatibility can be identified as success or failure at the point of graft union between rootstock and scion (Andrews & Marquez, 2010) and the presence of other abnormalities on the aerial part of the grafted tree (Amri et al., 2021). Different anatomical, physiological and biochemical interactions occur in the grafting union and above it, in the budded scion (Yildirim et al., 2010; Reig et al., 2018a, 2019; Amri et al., 2021). After successful grafting, callus formation, the establishment of a continuous cambium, the creation of new vascular tissue, and the production of a functional vascular system at the grafting location appear (Melnyk, 2017; Balbi et al., 2019). Also, the survival rate and the quality of vascular connections formed in the graft union primarily affect the success of grafting (Reig et al., 2018a).
Graft incompatibility is commonly classified into two groups, known as ‘translocated’ and ‘localized’ types (Andrews & Marquez, 2010; Reig et al., 2018a). The ‘translocated’ type is characterized by visual symptoms such as early termination of the scion, shriveling, leaf chlorosis, premature leaf dropping, and a radicular system not fully developed in the sapling (Zarrouk et al., 2006; Goldschmidt, 2014). The ‘localized’ type is characterized by anatomical irregularities at the graft union interface and breaks of vascular tissue in the callus bridge (Hartman et al., 2002; Zarrouk et al., 2010; Reig et al., 2019). Several phenotypic, anatomical, and enzymatic methods have been studied to determine grafting incompatibility in fruit species such as apple (Dolgun et al., 2009; Yildirim et al., 2010), pear (Gulen et al., 2002), apricot (Reig et al., 2018b), peach and nectarine (Zarrouk et al., 2006; 2010; Amri et al., 2021), and kiwifruit (Li et al., 2021). However, to our best knowledge, there is no study on the incompatibility of hawthorn trees searching for those two types of graft-incompatibility. In addition, graft compatibility or incompatibility can be phenotyped by anatomical evaluation one year after grafting (Reig et al., 2019; Irisarri et al., 2021), although delayed cases of incompatibility can be found in both types of graft-incompatibility: ‘translocated’ (Moreno et al., 1993) and ‘localized’ (Reig et al., 2019).
This study aimed to investigate the graft compatibility between hawthorn and four different pome fruit tree species and rootstocks. The obtained results will contribute to the application of modern fruit tree growing techniques in hawthorn cultivation by determining if clonal rootstock(s) from different species can be used in the production of hawthorn trees.
Material and methodsPlant material
This study was carried out in the experimental research area and laboratories of the Fruit Research Institute, Eğirdir/Isparta (37°49’19” N, 30°52’23” E, and altitude: 900 m), Türkiye. Two clonal rootstocks of apple (Malus communis L.) (MM106 and MM111), one of quince (Cydonia oblonga Mill) (Quince A), and one of pear (Pyrus communis L.) (Fox11), which could be genetically related to hawthorn species in the Maloideae subfamily (Hummer & Janick, 2009), were used as hawthorn rootstocks. These rootstocks were chosen because of their semi-vigorous growth, tolerance to heavy soil conditions, and suitability for calcareous soils with high pH. One-year-old hawthorn (C. azarolus L) saplings were also assessed as control. The ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar was used as the budded scion for all of those rootstocks (Fig. 1). This scion cultivar is popular for its big fruit size (∼15 g) and sweet-sour fruit flavor. At ripening, its yellow-green fruits contain 2-4 seeds, ∼15% total soluble solids, and ∼1.4% titratable acidity (Çalışkan et al., 2018).
Fruits, seeds, and fruit set in bearing trees of the ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar.
Grafting and grafting performance
One-year-old rooted plants of rootstocks were planted directly into the soil with planting spaces of 15 cm x 30 cm in February 2020, at the nursery conditions under a plastic greenhouse. Buds of the ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar were taken from a producers’ orchard in the Belen district of the Hatay province (36°43’09” N, 36°13’80” E, and altitude: 812 m), from young shoots of the current vegetative period in 2020. The shoots were stored at 4 °C until they were used in Eğirdir/Isparta, to avoid loss of their moisture.
The ‘Sultan’ cultivar was T-budded in situ in September 2020 on the five assessed rootstocks with three replicates, each consisting of ten plants for each budding combination. The ratio of graft success according to budding sprouting was measured in the spring.
The views of “translocated” graft-incompatibility were examined by the visual symptoms of shoots and leaves according to Moreno et al. (1993). Scion length (cm), scion diameter (mm), rootstock diameter (mm), and young tree length (cm) were measured in the following dormant season for scion growth performance in budded plants. To evaluate the graft compatibility, trunk development was measured at the graft union area, 5 cm above and 5 cm below, using a digital caliper (Caliskan & Karaman, 2018). In addition, the rootstock diameter/scion diameter ratio was used to estimate grafting incompatibility according to Reig et al. (2018a).
Anatomical and histological studies
To determine the compatibility between the grafting combinations consisting of different rootstocks, three biological samples (individual trees) were taken from each rootstock-scion combination, representing 1 cm below and above the grafting sites. Thus, anatomical and histological examinations were evaluated in grafting samples taken at 12 months for ‘localized’ incompatibility. The samples were preserved in 80% ethanol until sectioning. Then, 25 µm sections were cut directly with the aid of a rotary microtome (SM 2000 R Leica, Germany). These sections were photographed under the light microscope (Nikon Eclipse E 600, Japan) and stereomicroscope (Leica MC 165 C, Germany) after staining with 1% Safranin-O. Callus formation, condition of necrotic layers, vascular differentiation, and formation of new vascular tissues were assessed in these samples. According to these observations, graft compatibility was classified as proposed by Mosse & Herrero (1951): A, perfect unions (the line of the union between bark and wood is hardly visible); B, good unions (the bark and wood are continuous although the line of the union in the wood is often clearly distinguished by excessive ray formation); C, unions with discontinuities in the bark (the bark tissues of rootstock and scion are separated by a dark brown layer of corky appearance); D, unions showing vascular and wood discontinuities (the woody tissues of rootstock and scion are separated in many places by clusters of living, non-lignified parenchyma); and E, observed breakage of the tree at the graft union in the nursery or orchard.
Statistical analysis
The scion budding was made in rootstocks under nursery conditions, established in a randomized block design with 10 trees per block and a total of 30 young trees per each scion-rootstock graft combination. The differences between the means were determined by the Duncan multiple comparison test (p<0.05) using the JUMP software program. Pearson correlation coefficients and their levels of significance were also calculated.
Results and discussionGrafting performance
Traditional hawthorn orchards in Türkiye are established with scions ‘Sultan’ cultivar grafted on C. azarolus, used as hawthorn seedlings. However, clonal rootstocks that can be adapted to different climatic and soil conditions and are suitable for high-density planting will make a significant contribution to the development of modern hawthorn cultivation.
The visual symptoms of ‘Sultan’ plants showed that Sultan/Fox 11 and Sultan/Quince A presented good graft compatibility, demonstrated by healthy shoots and leaves, normal shoot growing, and standard appearance at the graft union, similar to the control rootstock (Fig. 2). In contrast, Sultan/MM 106 and Sultan/MM 111 plants displayed a common diagnosis of ‘translocated’ incompatibility, principally based on the yellowing of the leaves, the unhealthy view of shoots, and a decrease in shoot growth. These results were consistent with peach/plum graft incompatibility (Moreno et al., 1993) where typical visual symptoms of incompatibility appeared on the leaves (peach yellowing and reddening) and the growth values of the scion shoot were lower compared to compatible combinations during the first year after budding. However, initial graft success values were not correlated with the incidence of graft-incompatibility. In fact, Fox 11, Quince A, and MM 106 gave higher or similar percentages of grafting success compared to other rootstocks (Table 1). The grafting success ratios ranged between 60.6% (Control) and 69.0% (Fox 11 and Quince A). These values were slightly below 70%, which is considered an ideal grafting success. However, these results agreed with those of Caliskan & Karaman (2018), who reported that the grafting success of the hawthorn/seedling ranged between 40% and 84%, depending on the grafting method and stage. Nevertheless, in the third and fourth months after the bud sprouting, growth abnormalities in shoot vigor were already observed in MM106 and MM111 rootstocks. These results showed that the success of grafting between ‘Sultan’ hawthorn and apple, pear, and quince rootstocks was not a direct indication of graft incompatibility. In contrast, Li et al. (2021) reported that as an indicator of ‘translocated’ graft incompatibility in kiwi fruit species, the graft success decreased significantly in the days after grafting (DAG) from 99.17% to 58.47%, since 40 DAG to 80 DAG. On the other hand, in our study, the lack of continuity of the vascular tissues after grafting indicated ‘localized’ graft incompatibility, particularly in the apple rootstocks. Indeed, when morphological observations were made 12 months after budding, a healthy scion development was observed on the hawthorn seedlings, as well as on the Fox 11 and Quince A clonal rootstocks. In addition, a dense and well-structured callus tissue was formed in the graft region for these compatible rootstocks (Fig. 2). On the contrary, scion development and callus tissue were insufficient in the case of MM 106 and MM 111 apple rootstocks, especially on MM 111, where the resulting shoots reached only around 4.50 cm. In contrast, the scion cultivar exhibited the longest scion length on Fox 11 (43.18 cm) and hawthorn seedlings (31.52 cm) rootstocks. In turn, the highest scion diameter was also obtained from plants on Fox 11 and control rootstocks (7.47 mm and 6.64 mm, respectively), while the lowest scion diameter was obtained on the MM 111 (2.65 mm) and MM 106 (4.29 mm) apple rootstocks. Regarding the rootstock diameter, the highest values were shown in Quince A (11.13 mm) and Fox 11 (11.03 mm) rootstocks, whereas the lowest values were found in the MM 111 (9.07 mm) and the control (9.20 mm) rootstocks. In the case of graft diameter values, the highest values were measured in the control (13.74 mm) and the Fox 11 (15.04 mm) rootstocks, and the lowest values were observed in the MM 111 (7.73 mm) and MM 106 (10.60 mm) apple rootstocks (Table 1). It is well known that the growth vigor of both rootstock and cultivar used in grafting can directly affect shoot development in commercial grafting (Hartman et al., 2002; Pio et al., 2008). Similarly, Öztürk (2021) reported that the shoot length and diameter of the 13 pear genotypes grafted on different pear and quince rootstocks mainly depended on the rootstock vigor.
Tree vigor and grafting performance of the ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar budded on different clonal rootstocks and hawthorn seedlings.
Characters
Control [1]
Fox 11
MM1 06
MM 111
Quince A
Graft success (%)
60.6 b
69.0 a
66.7 a
62.5 b
69.0 a
Scion length (cm)
31.52 a
43.18 a
13.99 b
4.50 b
18.02 b
Scion diameter (mm)
6.64 ab
7.47 a
4.29 c
2.65 c
5.70 b
Rootstock diameter (mm)
9.20 b
11.03 a
10.06 ab
9.07 b
11.13 a
Graft union diameter (mm)
13.74 ab
15.04 a
10.60 c
7.73 c
12.75 b
Scion/rootstock ratio
0.73 a
0.67 a
0.43 bc
0.30 c
0.51 b
Rootstock/union ratio
0.69 c
0.73 c
0.95 b
1.17 a
0.88 b
Graft compatibility category [2]
A
A
D
D
B
[1] Hawthorn seedlings were used as a control in the trials. [2] Graft compatibility category (A, B, D), according to Mosse & Herrero (1951). Means in rows followed by the same letters are not significantly different at the 5% level.
Budding development in the 12<sup>th</sup>-month scion/rootstock young trees for the ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar on Fox11 (A), MM 106 (B), MM 111 (C), Quince A (D), and hawthorn seedling (E) rootstocks. S: scion. GU: graft union. R: rootstock.
The scion/rootstock and rootstock/union diameter ratios exhibited statistically significant differences among the different scion/rootstocks graft combinations (Table 1). The highest scion diameter/rootstock diameter ratio was found in the Fox 11 pear and control rootstocks (0.73 and 0.67, respectively), whereas the lowest rootstock diameter/union diameter ratio was observed in the control and Fox 11 rootstocks (0.67 and 0.73, respectively). In addition, the best graft combination occurred when the scion/rootstock ratio was lower than 0.7 and the rootstock/union ratio was lower than 0.8. According to Mosse & Herrero (1951), the control and Fox 11 rootstocks were classified in the category A, showing the best graft compatibility category with rootstock diameter/union diameter. Sultan/Quince A exhibited union features included in the B category. In contrast, anatomical investigation of the hawthorn ‘Sultan’ graft unions demonstrated the ‘localized’ incompatibility (category D) on MM 106 and MM 111 clonal rootstocks. Graft fusion tissues on these rootstocks had necrotic spots and no lignified tissues (Figs. 2 and 3). These results are comparable to those obtained from Reig et al. (2018a) who indicated that a clear ‘localized’ incompatibility (category ‘D’) could be identified between some apricot cultivars and plum rootstocks in the first year after grafting. In addition, our results showed that the scion/rootstock and rootstock/union properties could be used to predict the occurrence of graft incompatibility in hawthorn. Similarly, Reig et al. (2018a) reported that a value of 0.8 as the rootstock/scion ratio could be relevant in determining graft incompatibility. When this value was higher it could be related with the abnormalities at the graft union, probably by assimilates and water blockage. However, Ünal & Özçağıran (1986) indicated that the differences observed in the diameter of the scion/rootstock are not always associated with graft incompatibility and that this might be due to weak callus formation at the graft site and unsuitable conditions before and after grafting.
There were significant correlations between graft compatibility and shoot length and diameter, graft union diameter, scion/rootstock ratio, rootstock/union ratio, and stem diameter (Table 2). Results showed a high correlation value between the shoot diameter and graft compatibility (r= 0.94, p<0.01). The shoot length, graft union diameter, and scion/rootstock ratio were found to be moderately correlated with graft compatibility. These results showed that increases in shoot length and diameter, graft union diameter, and scion/rootstock ratio values were indicators of compatible graft combinations. Besides, the rootstock/union ratio was inversely related to graft compatibility. These results are consistent with the findings of Fadel et al. (2019), who reported that the ‘Pera’/Crova Rangpur graft combination with a high scion/rootstock diameter ratio showed a good compatibility, while ‘Pera’/Swingle citrumelo, with a lower scion/rootstock diameter ratio, showed a poor compatibility. Similarly, another study with different peach/Prunus spp. graft combinations (Zarrouk et al., 2006) showed a significant correlation between scion/rootstock diameter and incompatibility. Nevertheless, no significant differences were found between the scion/rootstock diameter values in apricot cultivars grafted on plum rootstocks (Reig et al., 2018a; Irisarri et al., 2021).
Correlation coefficients (r) of tree vigor characteristics were determined for grafting affinity tests.
The first vascular tissues formed in the callus bridge are the xylem and phloem, which repair the wound caused by budding. Wound-repairing xylem tissues mostly originate from the activity of scion tissues (Hartmann et al., 2002). In our study, the slowdown in the activity of the scion tissues, the decrease in the development of the budded scion cultivar, and the persistence of the necrotic areas may be explained because the vascular connection between the graft individuals was not fully established for the apple rootstocks. Baron et al. (2019) reported that the failure of the graft to grow may be due to the inability to carry phytohormones, carbohydrates, and mineral substances from the grafting point or to a smaller amount of them due to the incomplete transmission between the rootstock and scion. In addition, Amri et al. (2021) showed that ‘translocated’ graft-incompatibility can adversely affect the transport of the non-structural carbohydrates, such as starch and other biochemical compounds, as total phenolic content and flavonoids, from the scion to the incompatible rootstock. These effects should be further tested in the MM 111 and MM 106 clonal apple rootstocks budded with hawthorn scions, aiming to deepen our knowledge on the graft-incompatibility between apple rootstocks and hawthorn.
Necrotic areas at graft interfaces and discontinuities in phloem and xylem tissues are very critical in the development of both graft association and establishment of a good vascular connection (Irisarri et al., 2017). Those areas are formed because of damage to the cells on the cutting surfaces of the rootstock and scion during the preparation of the grafting. Most of these areas disappear later or remain as pockets in the callus tissue, which is formed by the active division of parenchyma cells, and in this way, the rootstock and scion are fused (Hartmann et al., 2002). Similarly, Mosse (1962) reported that these necrotic layers formed by the damaged cells in the graft area were broken down by the callus tissue formed after grafting, and thus the rootstock and scion were fused. In our study, the small amount of callus layer, especially on the MM 111 rootstock, could be insufficient to break the necrotic layer formed on the graft cutting surface (Fig. 3C). In addition, sufficient fusion at the lateral junctions of all graft combinations was observed, but the presence of necrotic lines along the junction of rootstock and scion in 12-month graft samples of MM 106 and MM 111 (Figs. 2B-C) could partially explain the weakness in scion development. Similarly, Irisarri et al. (2017) reported that no necrotic lines and disconnections were observed in the matched graft combination, whereas there was no continuity in the wood and bark tissues besides the necrotic line in the incompatible combinations.
Figure 3. Budding development and situation of tissues in the 12<sup>th</sup>-month budding samples in the ‘Sultan’ hawthorn cultivar on: Fox 11 (A), MM 106 (B), MM 111 (C), quince A (D), and hawthorn seedling (E) rootstocks. S: scion. R: rootstock. GU: graft union. Ca: callus. N: necrotic layer. Tr: trachea. Nxy: new xylem.
Cross-section photographs for all graft combinations studied are shown in Fig. 3. In graft samples, callus tissue was formed in the lateral air pockets of the grafts and between the cut surfaces. Similar to these results, Hartmann et al. (2002) reported that callus tissue mostly consisted of rootstock xylem. Indeed, the callus tissue at the lateral junctions consisted only of rootstock xylem. The fact that the rootstock has the root system and thus the nutrient reserves in roots and stem may explain the important contribution of the rootstock in the formation of callus tissue. While callus tissue fills well the rootstock and scion interfaces in Fox 11, Quince A, and hawthorn seedlings rootstocks, the density of callus tissue in MM 106 and MM 111 rootstocks was insufficient (Figs. 2, 3). Rasool et al. (2020) stated that the callus tissue is stimulated by reactive oxygen species, stimulation of genes providing resistance to stress, synthesis of enzymes, and other chemicals in response to the wound formed on graft cutting surfaces. Wounded tissues could activate genes that stimulate cytokinins that trigger callus formation. However, callus formation may be hampered by a reduction in auxin transmission from the scion to the rootstock due to the failure to establish the vascular connection in the later phases of grafting. This might be associated with insufficient callus formation in the 12-month grafted trees of MM111 and MM106 rootstocks. Mudge et al. (2009) reported that the intra- or inter-familiar grafts are rarely compatible or unsuccessful, while grafts between different species belonging to the same genus can be compatible in many cases (Reig et al., 2018a, 2019). Thus, hawthorn could be closely related to pear and genetically much more distant from apple, therefore resulting in graft incompatibility with apple rootstocks (Zarei et al., 2017).
As previously mentioned, the development of a compatible graft consists of three important stages: the fusion of rootstock and scion, the formation of the callus bridge at the graft interface, and vascular differentiation (Moore, 1984). In the present study, a callus bridge was successfully formed following the union of rootstock and scion in each graft combination. Later, a good vascular connection was also well established between rootstock and scion, providing cambial continuity in Fox 11 and Quince A clonal rootstocks, and hawthorn seedlings. There was also a partial cambial continuity in the case of MM 111 and MM 106 apple rootstocks. However, the differentiation into the vascular tissues for these two rootstocks was very low; therefore, scions did not grow, especially in the MM 111 rootstock.
In this study, the graft combinations with apple rootstocks (Sultan/MM 111 and Sultan/MM 106) showed that the two types of graft incompatibility can occur together, similar to previous reports in different fruit tree species (Moreno et al., 1995; Zarrouk et al., 2006). This may support that “localized” incompatibility in hawthorn/apple graft combinations might be the result of physiological anomalies in the graft fusion combination triggered by “translocated” incompatibility. These results agree with those of Zarrouk et al. (2006), who reported that carbohydrate blockage above the graft area in the ‘translocated’ incompatible grafts can disallow cambium formation at the graft area and so prevent vascular tissue improving and can cause the development of incompatibility in the graft combinations. Similarly, Machado et al. (2016) stated that there was both ‘located’ and ‘translocated’ incompatibility, between the ‘Williams’ pear cultivar and the Quince C rootstock, due to the discontinuity of the vascular tissues at the graft interface.
In conclusion, although genetic similarity is one of the most important factors in the establishment of compatible graft combinations, genetically related species do not always induce successful graft combinations. To our knowledge, several apple, pear, and quince clonal rootstocks have been analyzed for the first time in this study, using interspecific budding for hawthorn clonal propagation. Findings showed that Fox 11 and Quince A rootstocks could be initially used as clonal rootstocks for hawthorn, showing an adequate development of scion and vascular tissues at the graft union during the first year after budding. In contrast, ‘translocated’ and ‘localized’ graft incompatibility was observed in Sultan/MM 106 and Sultan/MM111 graft combinations meaning that MM 111 and MM 106 apple rootstocks are not suitable as clonal rootstocks for hawthorn trees due to the graft incompatibility incidence. Further work should be done to investigate for a longer period if delayed incompatibility could appear in the pear and quince compatible rootstocks and to determine the effect of these initially compatible rootstocks on yield, fruit quality, and other agronomic traits in hawthorn trees growing in orchard conditions.
Authors’ contributionsConceptualization: O. Caliskan, E. Kacal.Data curation: E. Kacal, G. Ozturk.Formal analysis: I. Gur, H. Kocal, O. F. Karamursel, D. Kilic.Funding acquisition: O. Caliskan, E. Kacal.Investigation: E. Kacal, G. Ozturk.Methodology: E. Kacal, G. Ozturk, O. Caliskan.Project administration: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan.Resources: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan.Software: E. Kacal, I. Gur, O. F. Karamursel.Supervision: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan.Validation: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan.Visualization: E. Kacal, D. Kilic.Writing – original draft: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan.Writing – review & editing: E. Kacal, O. Caliskan, M. A. Moreno.ReferencesAmriRFont i ForcadaCGiménezRPinaAMorenoMA2021Biochemical characterization and differential expression of PAL genes associated with ‘translocated’ peach/plum graft-incompatibility.Front Plant Sci10114https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.622578AndrewsPKMarquezCS2010Graft incompatibility.Hortic Rev15183232https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650547.ch5Bahri-SahloulRAmmarSGrecSHarzallah-SkhiriF2009Chemical characterization of Crataegus azarolus L. fruit from 14 genotypes found in Tunisia.J Hortic Sci Biotechnol842328https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2009.11512474BalbiRVPioRFariasDHMeloETPereiraMPPereiraFJ2019The cell regeneration and connection of grafting between pear and quince trees are defined by the cortex and phloem.Sci Hortic257108662https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108662BaronDAmaroACEPinaAFerreiraG2019An overview of grafting re-establishment in woody fruit species.Sci Hortic2438491https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.012BayazıtSGündüzKSezginEÖÇalışkanO2018Current situation and future of hawthorn culture in Hatay province.J Agric Fac Gaziosmanpasa Univ35258263https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4508CaliskanO2015Mediterranean hawthorn fruit (Crataegus spp.) species and potential usage.In: the Mediterranean diet: An evidence-based approach; Preddy VR & Watson RT (eds.).621628ElsevierAmsterdamhttps://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407849-9.00055-5CaliskanOBayazitSGunduzK2016Hawthorn species from Turkey and potential usage for horticulture.Proc VII Int Sci Agric Sym Jahorina (Bosnia and Herzegovina), Oct 6-9.330336CaliskanOKaramanH2018Effects of different grafting methods and times on grafting success and plant development in Sarı Alıç hawthorn genotype (Crataegus azarolus L.).J Agric Food Environ Sci72198202https://doi.org/10.55302/JAFES18721198cÇalışkanOGündüzKBayazitS2018Investigation of morphological, biological and fruit quality characteristics of Sarı Alıç hawthorn genotype (Crataegus azarolus L.).J Agric Faculty Gaziosmanpasa Univ356974ÇalışkanOMaviKBayazitSKılıçD2020Effects of some application on seedling emergence of hawthorn (Crataegus azarolus L.).Bahçe49139143BOE2015Order ECC/566/2015, of 20 March, that established the training requirements for personnel handling animals used, bred or supplied for experimental and other scientific purposes, including teachingBoletín Oficial del EstadoSpain7801/04/2015DolgunOYıldırımAPolatMYıldırımFAşkınA2009Apple graft formation in relation to growth rate features of rootstocks.Afr J Agric Res4530534DonmezAAOzderinS2019Additional contributions to taxonomy, nomenclature and biogeography of the Turkish Crataegus (Rosaceae) taxa.PhytoKeys122113https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.122.33002DursunAÇalışkanOGülerZBayazitSTürkmenDGündüzK2021Effect of harvest maturity on volatile compounds profiling and eating quality of hawthorn (Crataegus azarolus L.) fruit.Sci Hortic288110398https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110398ErcisliSYanarMSengulMYildizHTopdasEFTaskinTZenginY2015Physico-chemical activity of hawthorn (Crataegus spp. L.) fruits in Turkey.Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus148393EspenLCocucciMSacchiGA2005Differentiation and functional connection of vascular elements in compatible and incompatible pear/quince internode micrografts.Tree Physiol2514191425https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/25.11.1419FadelALStuchiESSilvaSRParolinLGOliveiraCRMüllerGVDonadioLC2019Compatibility and horticultural performance of Pera sweet orange clones grafted to Swingle citrumelo rootstock.Bragantia78564572https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.20190116FlaishmanMALoginovskiKGolobowichSLev-YadunS2008Arabidopsis thaliana as a model system for graft union development in homografts and heterografts.J Plant Growth Regul27231239https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-008-9050-yGoldschmidtEE2014Plant grafting: new mechanism, evolutionary implications.Front Plant Sci5727https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00727GulenHAroraRKudenAKrebsSLPostmanJ2002Apple graft formation about growth rate features of rootstocks.J Amer Soc Hort Sci127152157https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.2.152GundogduMOzrenkKErcisliSKanTKodadOHegedusA2014Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Turkey.Biol Res4721https://doi.org/10.1186/0717-6287-47-21GuoTJiaoP1995Hawthorn (Crataegus) resources in China.HortScience3011321134https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.6.1132GürİKoçalHKaçalEAydınlıMYalçınBKaramürselÖ2020Determination of grafting compatibility of some selected plum genotypes with Monroe peach and Aprikoz apricot varieties.Fruit Sci719HartmannHTKesterDEDaviesFTGeneveRL2002Hartmann and Kester’s plant propagation principles and practices.Prentice-HallUpper Saddle River, NJ, USA,880 ppHummerKEJanickJ2009 Rosaceae: Taxonomy, economic importance.In: Genetics and Genomics of Rosaceae; Folta KM & Gardiner SE (eds.).117SpringerNew Yorkhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77491-6_1IrisarriPErreaPPinaAZhebentyayevaT2017Genetic determinism of graft compatibility in apricot.Acta Hortic1172345348https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1172.64IrisarriPErreaPPinaA2021Physiological and molecular characterization of new apricot cultivars grafted on different Prunus rootstocks.Agronomy111464https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11081464IssaadiOFibianiMPicchiVScalzoRMadaniK2020Phenolic composition and antioxidant capacity of hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha L.) flowers and fruits grown in Algeria.J Compl Integr Med1720180125https://doi.org/10.1515/jcim-2018-0125LiWHuQ, P, QXuJG2015Changes in physicochemical characteristics and free amino acids of hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida) fruits during maturation.Food Chem1755056https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.11.125LiDHanFLiuXLvHLiLTianHZhongC2021Localized graft incompatibility in kiwifruit: Analysis of homografts and heterografts with different rootstock & scion combinations.Sci Hortic283110080https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110080MachadoBDMagroMRufatoLBogoAKreztschmarAA2016Graft compatibility between European pear cultivars and East Malling “C” rootstock.Rev Bras Frutic39e-063https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-29452017063MelnykCW2017Plant grafting: insights into tissue regeneration.Regen4314https://doi.org/10.1002/reg2.71MooreR1984A model for graft compatibility-incompatibility in higher plants.Am J Bot71752758https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1984.tb14182.xMorenoMAMoingALansacMGaudillèreJPSalessesG1993Peach/myrobalan plum graft incompatibility in the nursery.J Hortic Sci68705714https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1993.11516403MorenoMATabuencaMCCambraR1995Adara: A plum rootstock for cherries and other stone fruit species.HortScience3013161317https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.30.6.1316MosseBHerreroJ1951Studies on incompatibility between some pear and quince grafts.J Hortic Sci26238245https://doi.org/10.1080/00221589.1951.11513737MosseB1962Graft incompatibility in fruit trees.Tech Commun No. 28Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation CropsEast Malling, Maidstone, Kent, UK36 ppMudgeKJanickJScofieldSGoldschmidtEE2009A history of grafting.Hortic Rev35437493https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470593776.ch9NasMNGokbunarLSevginNAydemirMDagliMSusluogluZ2012Micropropagation of mature Crataegus aronia L., a medicinal and ornamental plant with rootstock potential for pome fruit.Plant Growth Regul675763https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-012-9662-xÖztürkA2021The effects of different rootstocks on the graft success and scion development of some pear cultivars.Int J Fruit Sci21932944https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2021.1948376PayneJAKrewerGW1990Mayhaw: A new fruit crop for the south.In: Advances in new crops; Janick J & Simon JE (eds.).317321TimberPortland, USA.PioRChagasEATombolatoAFC2008Interspecific and intergeneric pear, apple and quince grafting using Pyrus calleryana as rootstock.Acta Hortic800173178https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.800.97RasoolAMansoorSBhatKMHassanGIBabaTRAlyemeniMN2020Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants.Front Plant Sci11590847https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.590847ReigGZarroukOFont i ForcadaCMorenoMA2018aAnatomical graft compatibility study between apricot cultivars and different plum based rootstocks.Sci Hortic2376773https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.03.035ReigGFont i ForcadaCMestreLBetránJAMorenoMA2018bPotential of new Prunus cerasifera based rootstocks for adapting under heavy and calcareous soil conditions.Sci Hortic234193200https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.037ReigGSalazarAZarroukOFont i ForcadaCValJMorenoMÁ2019Long-term graft compatibility study of peach-almond hybrid and plum based rootstocks budded with European and Japanese plums.Sci Hortic243392400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.08.038ÜnalAÖzçağıranR1986A study on the occurrence of graft union in the budding.Doğa Turk J Agric For10397407Velasco-HernándezASaucedo-VelozCNieto-ÁngelRRamírez-GuzmánMESaucedo-ReyesDNieto-LópezEH2017Fruit growth, maturation, and shelf life of two cultivars of tejocote (Crataegus mexicana Moc. & Sessé).Fruits727481https://doi.org/10.17660/th2017/72.2.2WuMLiuLXingYYangSLiHCaoY2020Roles and mechanisms of hawthorn and its extracts on atherosclerosis: A review.Front Pharmacol11118https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00118YildirimANPolatMDolgunOAşkinMAGökbayrakZŞanB2010Graft formation in some spur and vigorous apple varieties grafted on Ottawa 3 rootstock: A histological investigation.J Food Agric Environ8512514ZareiAErfai-MoghadamJMozaffariM2017Phylogenetic analysis among some pome fruit trees of Rosaceae family using RAPD markers.Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 31289298https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1276414ZarroukOPinochetJGogorcenaYMorenoMÁ2006Graft compatibility between peach cultivars and Prunus rootstocks.HortScience4113891394https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.6.1389ZarroukOTestillanoPSRisueñoMCMorenoMÁGogorcenaY2010Changes in cell/tissue organization and peroxidase activity as markers for early detection of graft incompatibility in peach/plum combinations.J Am Soc Hortic Sci135917https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.135.1.9