SJAR Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research SJAR 2171-9292 Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) 8505 10.5424/sjar/2016143-8505 Research Article Genetics of drought tolerance at seedling and maturity stages in Zea mays L. Genetics of drought tolerance at seedling and maturity stages in maize Khan Nazar H. University of Agriculture, Dept. of Continuing Education, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan Ahsan Muhammad University of Agriculture, Dept. of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan Naveed Muhammad University of Agriculture, Dept. of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Pulses Research Institute, Faisalabad 38850, Pakistan Sadaqat Hafeez A. University of Agriculture, Dept. of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan Javed Imran University of Agriculture, Dept. of Plant Breeding & Genetics, Faisalabad 38040, Pakistan should be addressed to Muhammad Naveed: naveed1735@yahoo.com. 30 09 2016 2016 14 3 10.5424/sjar/2016143-8505 22 08 2015 30 06 2016 © 2016 INIA 2016 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial (by-nc) Spain 3.0 Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract

Shortage of irrigation water at critical growth stages of maize is limiting its production worldwide. Breeding drought-tolerant cultivars is one possible solution while identification of potential genotypes is crucial for genetic improvement. To assess genetic variation for seedling-stage drought tolerance, we tested 40 inbred lines in a completely randomized design under glasshouse conditions. From these, two contrasting inbred lines were used to develop six basic generations (P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1F1, BC2F2). These populations were then evaluated in a triplicated factorial randomized complete block design under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. For statistical analyses, a nested block design was employed to ignore the replication effects. Significant differences (p≤0.01) were recorded among the genotypes for investigated seedling-traits. Absolute values of fresh root length, fresh root weight, and dry root weight lead to select two genotypes, one tolerant (WFTMS) and one susceptible (Q66). Estimates of heritability, genetic advance, and genotypic correlation coefficients were higher and significant for most of the seedling-traits. Generation variance analysis revealed additive gene action. Narrow-sense heritability [F2 ≥ 65; F∞ ≥ 79] revealed the same results. Generation mean analysis signified additive genetic effects in the inheritance of cob girth, non-additive for plant height, grains per ear row and grain yield per plant, and environmental for ear leaf area, cob length, grain rows per ear, biomass per plant, and 100-grain weight under drought-stressed conditions. For conferring drought-tolerance in maize, breeders can adopt the recombinant breeding strategy to pyramid the desirable genes.

 Additional key words genetic effects maize morphological and seedling traits water stress Abbreviations used BPP (biomass per plant) CG (cob girth) CL (cob length) CRD (completely randomized design) DRW (dry root weight) DS (drought-stressed) DSW (dry shoot weight) E (emergence) ELA (ear leaf area) FRCBD (factorial randomized complete block design) FRL (fresh root length) FRW (fresh root weight) FSL (fresh shoot length) FSW (fresh shoot weight) GPER (grains per ear row) GRPE (grain rows per ear) GYPP (grain yield per plant) HGW (100-grain weight) NS (non-stressed) PH (plant height) This research work has not been funded by any agency or organization.

Authors’ contributions: Conceived and performed the experiments: NHK. Data recording: NHK and IJ. Data analysis and paper write-up: NHK and MN. Supervised and coordinated the research project: MA and HAS.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

 Introduction

Maize (Zea mays L.), commonly known as corn, is a major staple consumed as food, feed, and raw materials in many industrial products worldwide. Its grains are a rich source of starch, protein, oil, fiber, sugar, and ash (Chaudhry, 1983). Globally, maize is grown on an area of about 183 Mha with 1021 Mt production annually (http://faostat.fao.org/). Its demand in the international market, especially in developing countries, is expected to rise from 526 to 784 Mt owing to reduced cropland and increased growth rate (Chen et al., 2012).

Among cereals, maize is highly productive under suitable environmental and better management conditions. At the same time, it is also very sensitive to drought and heat-stresses and may result in yield losses of 15-20% annually (Lobell et al., 2011). However, these yield losses depends upon stress severity, duration and occurrence at the crop stage. Drought-stress during V8 to V17 plant growth stages affects maize plant development, architecture, ear size and kernels number severely (Heiniger, 2001; Farré & Faci, 2006). Drought occurring two weeks before and during silking phase reduces seed setting and kernel size, causing 20-50% significant yield losses (Schussler & Westgate, 1991; Nielsen, 2007). Negative effects of drought on crop productions are likely to increase in the outlook due to unpredictable global climatic changes (Sanderson et al., 2011). Improvement in water-use efficiency through management practices and evolution of stress-tolerant crop varieties will likely play an effective role in mitigating damaging effects of abiotic plant stresses on agricultural production (Tester & Langridge, 2010).

As drought is quantitative in nature, therefore, requires an understanding of genetic mechanisms controlling various plant traits for adopting different breeding approaches (Khan et al., 2004; Ahsan et al., 2013). Assessment of crop genotypes at seedling-stage is an imperative feature of plant breeding for developing drought-tolerant cultivars. Vigorous maize seedlings lead to healthy crop and ultimately good production under water-deficit conditions. Potential variations exist in maize genetic stocks for drought-tolerance. Identification and characterization of genotypes for the said purpose is the primary step in developing drought-tolerant cultivars (Chen et al., 2012; Naveed et al., 2016a). This requires an understanding of gene action controlling various seedling and morphological plant traits. Various biometrical techniques could be used for appraising genetic effects. Among these, generation mean analysis is the one which determines the type of epistasis at digenic level using scaling test, accurately and efficiently (Naveed et al., 2016b). In view of the above, we conducted this study to identify the contrasting inbred lines at seedling-stage drought-stress and to find the inheritance pattern of gene or genes involved in the drought-tolerance using six basic generations.

 Material and methods Plant material and other experimental details

Drought-tolerance studies in maize at seedling and maturity stages were carried out in the Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan during the years 2010-13. For this purpose, 40 out of 200 maize inbred lines, collected from different research organizations were selected based on characterization/information provided by the contributors.

As the screening experiments were conducted inside the glasshouse, the design used for laying out the plant material was completely randomized (CR). However, for the evaluation of six basic generations in non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions, we applied a factorial randomized complete block design (FRCBD) with three repeats. Row to row and plant to plant distances maintained were 75 and 25 cm, respectively. Agronomic and crop husbandry practices were followed according to experimental needs.

 Screening at seedling stage

This experiment was conducted in a glasshouse during autumn, 2010. A total of 36 seeds of each test entry were sown in all 3 replications using the same number of polythene bags (20×15 cm each) in two separate sets: Set-I, irrigation was applied to the 100% of the field capacity or crop need, while in Set-II irrigation was applied to the 50% of the field capacity.

Seven days after the sowing of seeds in polythene bags, 150 mL of water was applied to both the experimental sets. Fifteen days following the sowing, another irrigation of 150 mL of water was given just once to Set-I only. However, 21 days after the sowing and for uprooting the seedlings, 150 mL of water was applied to both the experimental sets. After uprooting and washing with tap water cautiously, the seedlings were dried by wrapping them in blotting papers for 10 minutes.

To select the desirable parents, assessment of the germplasm was done on absolute genotypic performances for investigated seedling-traits. This selection procedure had extensively been employed by other researchers (Azhar et al., 2005; Akhter et al., 2007; Iqbal et al., 2011). We measured the following plant characters by using the procedures given in Table 1: fresh root length (FRL), fresh root weight (FRW), dry root weight (DRW), emergence% (E), shoot length, fresh shoot weight (FSW), and dry shoot weight (DSW) under the contrasting conditions (Matsui & Singh, 2003; Qayyum et al., 2012). Data were recorded on 8 seedlings/genotype selected randomly and analyzed using analysis of variance (Steel et al., 1997). Phenotypic and genotypic correlation coefficients between pairs of seedling traits were calculated using individual plant data of F2 population (Kwon & Torrie, 1964). Broad-sense heritability (Weber & Moorthy, 1952) and genetic advance (Falconer & Mackay, 1996) were also worked out for seedling-traits.

Various seedling and morphological plant traits of maize recorded under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. Studies at physiological plant maturity

Based on seedling-traits, two contrasting inbred lines were selected and used as parents (P1 and P2) to develop F1 seed during autumn, 2011. P1 was used as pollen parent while P2 as female parent. During autumn 2012, both parents (P1 and P2) and their hybrids (F1) were raised under field conditions. Some of the F1 plants were selfed as a source for raising F2 population while the remaining F1 plants were backcrossed with P1 and P2 to develop BC1F1 and BC2F2 generations, respectively.

During autumn 2013, seeds of these six basic generations (P1, P2, F1, F2, BC1F1, and BC2F2) were planted in two sets, one under field (non-stressed) and the other under drought-stressed conditions. Per replication, 30 plants were sown of each parent (P1, P2) and their hybrids (F1), 60 of each backcross (BC1F1, BC2F2), and 200 of the F2 generation. To record the data in a replication, randomly guarded 15 plants were selected each of P1, P2 & F1 while 30 plants each of BC1F1, BC2F2, and 60 plants of F2 generations, separately both from non-stressed and drought-stressed experiments. Data were recorded on various plant traits, such as plant height, ear leaf area, cob length, cob girth, grain rows per ear, grains per ear row, biomass per plant, 100-grain weight, and grain yield per plant at physiological plant maturity.

 Statistical analysis

Observations recorded on different plant traits of six basic generations were analyzed using nested block design to ignore the replication effects. Variance analysis of each character was done according to Steel et al. (1997). Generation mean and variance analyses were performed to find the type of genetic effects and components of variance associated with inheritance of traits for each regime, separately (Mather & Jinks, 1982). Mean and variances of parents (P1 & P2), backcrosses (BC1 & BC2), and segregating generations (F1 & F2) for each trait were averaged over replications before use in statistical and biometrical analyses. A weighted least square analysis was done on generation mean using simplest residual (m) model and tested for goodness of fit. If chi-square value of one-factor model [m] was significant then further models of increasing complexity [md, mdh, etc.] were tried and tested for goodness of fit. The best model was the one which had significant estimates of all the variables along with non-significant chi-square value. The parent with higher value was always taken as P1 in the model fitting for each trait. Sum of squares (SS) for those comparisons were generated following Little & Hills (1978). Estimates of narrow-sense heritability of various morphological traits were also computed (Mather & Jinks, 1982).

 Results Selection of parents on the basis of seedling traits

Mean squares acquired from analysis of variance of experiments conducted under non-stressed and drought-stressed environments revealed significant differences among the genotypes for the traits investigated (Table 2). The responses of genotypes varied for all the measured traits under both the experimental regimes. Inbred line WFTMS exhibited, in non-stressed vs drought-stressed conditions: the highest FRL (35.5 vs 34.0 cm), FSL (40.9 vs 30.1 cm), FRW (38.7 vs 15.2 g), FSW (16.8 vs 11.8 g), DRW (27.3 vs 13.2 g) and DSW (4.1 vs 3.4 g). Inbred line Q66, however, presented the lowest values for FRL (20.8 vs 21.4 cm), FSL (19.8 vs 12.9 cm), FRW (10.5 vs 2.7 g), FSW (6.4 vs 1.2 g), DRW (4.9 vs 1.1 g), and DSW (0.7 vs 0.4 g). WFTMS and W64SP displayed the highest E%, while WF-9, the lowest. Some experimental lines, B34 and W187R revealed encouraging results for some traits, but not for others. Among all the tested genotypes, two inbred lines, WFTMS and Q66 appeared most divergent under both conditions, therefore, they were selected to develop breeding material for conducting genetic studies of drought-tolerance. On overall basis, estimates of root length, shoot length, fresh root weight and dry root weight under drought-stressed regime were greater than the non-stressed one.

Mean performance and statistical significance for various seedling-traits in 40 maize inbred lines under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. Assessment of genetic variability

Various descriptive statistics regarding genetic variability are given in Table 3. The coefficient of variability (CV) was highest for DRW (55.45%) while lowest for FRL (17.76%) in drought-stressed conditions. However, under the non-stressed regime, DSW (49.06%) and E% (5.43%) revealed the highest and least CV values, respectively. The magnitudes of genotypic variances were lesser in comparison to phenotypic variances for the traits studied. The variance estimates under drought-stressed condition were higher than the respective variances under the non-stressed regime. Estimates of broad-sense heritability were high (>60%) for all the investigated traits in both conditions except for E% in the non-stressed environment which was low (<60%). The genetic advance was low for E% and moderate for FRL under non-stressed conditions, while high (>20%) for all the other traits under both the environmental conditions.

Genetic parameters for various maize seedling-traits in 40 inbred lines under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. Association studies among seedling traits

In non-stressed conditions, most of the seedling-traits exhibited positive and significant associations among each other except for DRW with FRL, FRW and FSW, and for DRW with DSW at genotypic and phenotypic levels (Table 4). Similarly in the drought-stressed regime, correlation coefficients recorded were positive and significant for most of the traits except for FRL with FSL, FSL with FRW and DSW, and for FSW with DRW (Table 5).

Genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients among various maize seedling-traits under non-stressed conditions. Genotypic and phenotypic correlation coefficients among various maize-seedling traits under drought-stressed conditions.

The selected inbred lines, WFTMS, a tolerant male parent (P1), and Q66, a susceptible female parent (P2), were used to develop six basic generations. The generation means for various traits indicated significant differences (p<0.01) among parents (P1, P2), their hybrids (F1) and segregating (F2, BC1F1, BC2F2) populations for the traits studied under both non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions (Table 6). Filial-generation one (F1) means fell outside the range of both the parents for traits like ELA, GRPE, BPP and GYPP in drought-stressed conditions, and PH in the non-stressed regime, suggesting a transgressive segregation. Mean estimates of six basic generations for the investigated traits were higher in the non-stressed regime than in the respective drought-stressed conditions. Differences in mean values of F1, F2 and backcrosses (BC1F1 and BC2F2) for all the traits were due to the parental contribution in a particular trait. These results pointed sufficient differences among the genetic material developed which led to perform generation mean analysis.

Generation means for various morphological traits of maize under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions.

Estimates of genetic effects controlling inheritance pattern of various plants are given in Table 7. Dominance with epistatic additive-additive gene interaction was predominant in controlling PH under both the conditions, while GYPP, only under the drought-stressed regime. Epistatic additive-additive digenic effects controlled the inheritance of ELA in non-stressed conditions. The simply mean value best fitted to data of CL and GRPE under both the conditions, and of ELA and GPER in the non-stressed regime, while to data of BPP and HGW only under drought-stressed environments. Non-allelic additive-additive gene action was recorded for CG and HGW of this crossed material under the non-stressed regime. Duplicate dominance with additive-additive and additive-dominance interactions was crucial in controlling GPER under the drought-stressed regime. For BPP under the non-stressed conditions, we observed additive gene action with non-allelic dominance-dominance interaction.

Genetic effects for various morphological traits of maize under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions.

Estimates of components of genetic variance and narrow sense heritability are given in Table 8. Under the drought-stressed conditions for plant traits such as PH, ELA, GRPE, GPER and HGW, additive [D], environmental [E], and interaction [F] components of genetic variance were important in contrast to only [D] and [E] component for CL, CG, BPP and GYPP. In non-stressed conditions, [D] and [E] variances predominated for traits like PH, ELA, CL, CG, GRPE, HGW and GYPP in comparison to three variance components [D, E, and F] for GPER and BPP. Narrow sense heritability under non-stressed conditions ranged 69% (GPER) to 92% (PH) in comparison to the range of 65% (PH) to 90% (CG, GYPP) under drought-stressed conditions. The estimates for CL, CG, HGW and GYPP were higher under drought-stressed than under non-stressed conditions. Estimates of heritability for infinity-generation (F∞) were high in contrast to the F2 population for all the traits under both non-stressed and drought-stressed environments.

variance components for various morphological traits of maize under non-stressed and drought-stressed conditions. Discussion

Drought is one of the leading abiotic plant stresses that affect plants at various levels of their organization (Yordanov et al., 2000). Building tolerance against it, therefore, requires genetic improvement of crop plants without any cost in yield potential. Plants copes the dry soils by employing different mechanisms ranging avoidance to tolerance. One way of managing adverse effects of drought is the development of deep-rooted genotypes by altering the carbon distribution models (Lopes & Reynolds, 2011). Longer roots displayed clear benefit in soils with deep water availability (Sponchiado et al., 1989). Previously, research efforts remain focused more on improving shoot traits linked with photosynthesis and stay-green characteristics than on the root traits (Lopes et al., 2011).

Drought affected maize plant right from seedling to grain filling stages (Haq et al., 2015). At seedling stage, it reduced root and shoot growth in maize (Thomas & Howarth, 2000). It increased root length and root weight (Rao & Singh, 2004) while decreased shoot length and its fresh weight (Thakur & Rai, 1984), and root and shoot dry weights in maize (Matsuura et al., 1996; Ali et al., 2011). Drought tolerant cultivars had higher fresh and dry shoot weights in comparison to susceptible ones (Ashraf, 1989). Water-stress, not only dwindled the maize plant height but also decreased ear leaf area causing reduction in ear length and grain yield (El-Hifny et al., 2003; Ross et al., 2006; Moosavi, 2012). Decrease in grains per ear row and 100-grain weight was also noticed under drought conditions (Saeed et al., 1997; Khayatnezhad et al., 2011). The causes of reduction in grains per ear may either be embryo abortion or delayed silk appearance under drought-stressed conditions (Wasson et al., 2000).

In the present study, assessment of various seedling traits for drought tolerance revealed significant variability among the 40 maize inbred lines. The estimates pertaining to different traits exhibited significant reduction under the drought-stressed regime in contrast to non-stressed conditions. This is in agreement to the observations of Ali et al. (2013). The selection of drought-tolerant (WFTMS) and susceptible (Q66) genotypes was done on the basis of FRL and other seedling traits under both the environments which were further used for the genetic studies of various morphological traits. The choice of the contrasting genotypes was made by considering actual performance under both the environments. The method of relative performance or percentage increase or decrease for each trait was not employed due to its ineffectiveness in selecting the potential genotypes. The reason is that the actual performance of some the genotypes were far better under both the conditions than those favored by percentage increase/decrease method. The study of genetic components for seedling-traits revealed higher values for most traits in drought-stressed than non-stressed conditions, implying that choice of criterion is vital for pyramiding drought-tolerance in maize. Components of genetic variability and association studies suggested that traits such as FRL, FRW and DRW could be considered for developing drought-tolerant maize genotypes while for non-stressed conditions, traits like FSL, FRL, FRW and DRW might be considered.

Dissection of genetic variation into different components using biometric methods is important for a plant breeder to exploit the potential genetic resources through plant selections and hybridization schemes. The procedure of generation mean and variance analyses had extensively been used for drought-tolerance studies in cotton (Khan et al., 2014), wheat (Munir et al., 2007) and maize (Ahsan et al., 2013). Generation mean analysis for PH revealed involvement of dominance genetic effects in its inheritance under both the environments. Yadav et al. (2003) also reported such gene action for PH. However, positive [i] complicated the situation, therefore, requires further progeny testing under both conditions. Significance of only residual [m] effects for CL and GRPE under both environments while for ELA, BPP and HGW in drought-stressed conditions and for GPER in non-stressed environments suggested the potential role of environment in the inheritance of these traits. These findings are in agreement to the observations of Bernardo et al. (1992), Blum et al. (2001), Aslam et al. (2006), Jabeen et al. (2008) and Taheri et al. (2011). Additive-dominance along with epistatic (additive-additive) interaction effects were recorded for ELA under non-stressed environments. Iqbal et al. (2012) suggested postponement of plant selections till the later generations for plant traits with such type of gene action. For CG and HGW, epistatic additive-additive interaction was predominant under the non-stressed conditions in comparison to additive genetic effects under the drought-stressed environments. Similar results were reported by Chen et al. (1996), Singh et al. (2000), Tripathy et al. (2000), Malik et al. (2004) and Aslam et al. (2006). Positive values of genetic effects and epistatic interactions indicate the possibility to fix cob girth and 100-grain weight in the later generations. Dominance and epistatic [ijl] gene action for GPER under drought-stressed conditions suggested postponement of plant selections to later generations. Tabassum et al. (2007) and Jabeen et al. (2008) also made similar suggestions. Negative [dhi] values for grain per ear row under drought-stressed conditions revealed that conducting plant selections might be ineffective for this trait. Positive l suggests that dominance-dominance interaction is responsible for the increase in grains per ear row under drought-stressed conditions. For BPP, additive gene action with dominance-dominance interaction was found crucial under the non-stressed conditions. These results are in agreement to the observations of Taheri et al. (2011). Positive d indicated increase while negative l suggested decrease in plant biomass, implying that the model is complex and further progeny testing is required for the improvement of this trait. Involvement of duplicate gene action in the inheritance of GYPP under the non-stressed environments offered a complex situation and suggested delaying the plant selections to later generations. These findings are similar to the one reported by Afarinesh et al. (2005) and Kanagarasu et al. (2010). Iqbal et al. (2015) suggested usefulness of crossing among the desirable segregants in the segregating populations for those traits where early selection cannot be exercised.

Dissection of total variance into D (additive), H (dominance), E (environmental), and F (interaction) components had been used previously for genetic studies (Haq et al., 2015; Iqbal et al., 2015). Contribution of additive (D) variance in contrast to other components was much higher in all the investigated traits. However, the interaction (F) variance for traits such as PH, ELA, GRPE, GPER, and HGW under drought-stressed conditions complicated their inheritance pattern. Larger and significant estimates of additive (D) variance for CL, CG, BPP and GYPP under drought and PH, ELA, CL, CG, GRPE, HGW and GYPP under the non-stressed environments indicated involvement of positive and negative alleles from the two parents in the developed genetic material (Rahman & Malik, 2008; Khan et al., 2014). Higher estimates of narrow-sense heritability under both non-stressed and drought-stressed regimes are encouraging for maize breeders implying that plant selections for drought-tolerant recombinants could be conducted in the segregating progeny of this particular crossed material.

We may conclude that root traits like length, fresh and dry weights can be vital for effective screening of maize genotypes at seedling-stage drought-stress. Further, hybridization and adoption of recombinant breeding strategy could be the way forward for developing drought-tolerant genotypes.

 References Afarinesh A Farshadfar E Choukan R Genetic analysis of drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) using diallel method Seed Pl 2005 20 457 473 Ahsan M Farooq A Khaliq I Ali Q Aslam M Kashif M Inheritance of various yield contributing traits in maize (Zea mays L.) at low moisture condition Afr J Agr Res 2013 8 413 420 http://dx.doi.org/10.5897/AJAR13.004 Akhter M Ahmad M Ramzan M Effect of photoperiod sensitivity on yield and other economic traits of new strains of basmati rice (Oryza sativa L.) J Anim Plant Sci 2007 17 79 82 Ali Q Ahsan M Ali F Muhammad S Manzoor M Khan NH Basra SMA Mustafa HSB Genetic advance, heritability, correlation, heterosis and heterobeltiosis for morphological traits of maize (Zea mays L) Albanian J Agric Sci 2013 12 689 698 Ali Z Basra SMA Munir H Mahmood A Yousaf S Mitigation of drought stress in maize by natural and synthetic growth promoters J Agri Soc Sci 2011 7 56 62 Ashraf M The effect of NaCl on water relations, chlorophyll, protein and proline contents of two cultivars of black gram (Vigna mungo L.) Plant Soil 1989 119 205 211 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02370409 Aslam M Aziz K Ali M Relationship of some morpho-physiological traits with grain yield in maize Pak J Biol Sci 2006 2 244 246 Azhar MT Khan AA Khan IA Combining ability analysis of heat tolerance in Gossypium hirsutum L. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 2005 41 23 28 Bernardo R Bourrier M Olivier JL Generation mean analysis of resistance to head smut in maize Agronomie 1992 12 303 306 http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:19920403 Blum A Klueva N Nguyen HT Wheat cellular thermotolerance is related to yield under heat stress Euphytica 2001 117 117 123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1004083305905 Chaudhry AR Maize in Pakistan 1983 Punjab Agriculture Research Coordination Board, UAF Pakistan Chen J Xu W Velten J Xin Z Stout J Characterization of maize inbred lines for drought and heat tolerance J Soil Water Conserv 2012 67 354 364 http://dx.doi.org/10.2489/jswc.67.5.354 Chen ZH Legrono ML Carpena AL Lales J Genetics of characters associated with drought resistance in maize (Zea mays L.) Philipp J Crop Sci 1996 21 71 75 El-Hifny MZ Kheiralla KAA El-Nagar GR Aly MBM Evaluation of maize (Zea mays L.) S1 lines under favorable and water stress conditions Assiut J Agric Sci 2003 34 99 114 Falconer DS Mackay TFC Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996 4 Longman Inc UK Farré I Faci JM Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment Agr Water Manage 2006 83 135 143 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.11.001 Guzman PS Lamkey KR Effective population size and genetic variability in the BS 11 maize population Crop Sci 2000 40 338 346 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2000.402338x Haq AU Tahir MHN Ahsan M Ahmad R Akram HM Screening and inheritance pattern studies of maize seedlings under normal and water stress conditions Pak J Life Soc Sci 2015 13 97 103 Heiniger RW The impact of early drought on corn yield 2001 North Carolina State University Raleigh, NC, USA http://www.ces.ncsu.edu/plymouth/cropsci/docs/early_drought_impact_on_corn.html Iqbal J Saleem M Ahsan M Ali A General and specific combining ability analysis in maize under normal and moisture stress conditions J Anim Plant Sci 2012 22 1048 1054 Iqbal J Ahsan M Saleem M Ali A Appraisal of gene action for indeterminate growth in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] Front Plant Sci 2015 6 665 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00665 Iqbal K Azhar FM Khan IA Ullah E Variability for drought tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and its genetic basis Int J Agric Biol 2011 13 61 66 Jabeen F Shahbaz M Ashraf M Discriminating some prospective cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.) for drought tolerance using gas exchange characteristics and proline contents as physiological markers Pak J Bot 2008 40 2329 2343 Kanagarasu S Nallathambi G Ganesan KN Combining ability analysis for yield and its component traits in maize (Zea mays L.) Elec J Plant Breed 2010 1 915 920 Khan IA Habib S Sadaqat HA Tahir MHN Selection criteria based on seedling growth parameters in maize varies under normal and water stress conditions Int J Agric Biol 2004 6 252 256 Khan N Azhar FM Khan AA Ahmad R Measurement of canopy temperature for heat tolerance in upland cotton: variability and its genetic basis Pak J Agric Sci 2014 51 359 365 Khayatnezhad M Hasanuzzaman M Gholamin R Assessment of yield and yield components and drought tolerance at end-of season drought condition on corn hybrids (Zea mays L.) Aus J Crop Sci 2011 5 1493 1500 Kwon SH Torrie JH Heritability and interrelationship of two soybean (Glycine max L.) populations Crop Sci 1964 4 196 198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400020023x Little TM Hills FJ Agricultural experimentation: design and analysis 1978 John Wiley & Sons Inc. NY Lobell DB Bänziger M Magorokosho C Vivek B Nonlinear heat effects on African maize as evidenced by historical yield trials Nat Climate Change 2011 1 42 45 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1043 Lopes MS Reynolds MP Drought adaptive traits and wide adaptation in elite lines derived from re-synthesized hexaploid wheat Crop Sci 2011 51 1617 1626 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.07.0445 Lopes MS Araus JL Heerdens PDR Foyer CH Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops J Exp Bot 2011 62 3135 3153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err105 Malik SI Malik HN Minhas NM Munir M General and specific combining ability studies in maize diallel crosses Int J Agric Biol 2004 6 856 859 Mather K Jinks JL Biometrical Genetics 1982 Chapman & Hall Ltd London http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3406-2 Matsui T Singh BB Root characteristics in cowpea related to drought tolerance at the seedling stage Exp Agr 2003 39 29 38 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479703001108 Matsuura A Inanaga S Sugimoto Y Mechanism of inter-specific differences among four gramineous crops in growth response to soil drying Jap J Crop Sci 1996 65 352 360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1626/jcs.65.352 Moosavi SG The effect of water deficit stress and nitrogen fertilizer levels on morphology traits, yield and leaf area index in maize Pak J Bot 2012 44 1351 1355 Munir M Chowdhry MA Ahsan M Generation mean studies in bread wheat under drought condition Int J Agric Biol 2007 9 282 286 Naveed M Shafiq M Rafiq CM Naeem MK Amin M Grain yield stability of newly evolved desi chickpea strains under rainfed conditions J Anim Plant Sci 2016 26 481 486 Naveed M Ahsan M Akram HM Aslam M Ahmed N Genetic effects conferring heat tolerance in a cross of tolerant × susceptible maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes Front Plant Sci 2016 7 729 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00729 Nielsen RL Assessing effects of drought on corn grain yield? 2007 Purdue University West Lafayette, IN, USA http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.07/Drought-0705.html Qayyum A Ahmad S Liaqat S Malik W Noor E Saeed HM Hanif M Screening for drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids at an early seedling stage Afr J Agric Res 2012 7 3594 3604 Rahman S Malik TA Genetic analysis of fibre traits in cotton Int J Agric Biol 2008 10 209 212 Rao PS Singh RD Studies on combining ability for drought tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.) using poly ethylene glycol (PEG) as an osmoticum Ann Agr Biol Res 2004 9 135 139 Ross AJ Hallauer AR Lee M Genetic analysis of traits correlated with maize ear length Maydica 2006 51 301 313 Saeed M Masood MT Gill MB Akhtar M Agro-morphological response of maize to water stress Pak J Bot 1997 29 103 111 Sanderson MG Hemming DL Betts RA Regional temperature and precipitation changes under high-end (≥ 4 °C) global warming Philos T R Soc A 2011 369 85 98 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0283 Schussler JR Westgate ME Assimilate flux determines kernel set at low water potential in maize Crop Sci 1991 35 1074 1080 http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500040026x Singh RD Yadav T Bhat JS Combining ability analysis in varietal crosses of maize New Botanist 2000 27 29 36 Sponchiado BN White JW Castillo JA Jones PG Root growth of four common bean cultivars in relation to drought tolerance in environments with contrasting soil types Exp Agr 1989 25 249 257 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700016756 Steel RGD Torrie JH Dicky DA Principles and procedures of statistics. A biometrical approach 1997 McGraw Hill Book Co. NY Tabassum MI Saleem M Akbar M Ashraf MY Mehmood N Combining ability studies in maize under normal and drought conditions J Agric Res 2007 45 261 268 Taheri S Saba J Shekari F Abdullah TL Physiological responses of tolerant spring wheat lines under water stress J Food Agric Environ 2011 9 545 551 Tester M Langridge P Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world Science 2010 327 818 822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700 Thakur PS Rai VK Water stress effects on maize growth responses of two differentially drought sensitive maize cultivars during early stage of growth Ind J Ecol 1984 11 92 98 Thomas H Howarth CJ Five ways to stay green J Exp Bot 2000 51 329 337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.suppl_1.329 Tripathy JN Zhang J Robin S Nguyen TT Nguyen HT QTLs for cell membrane stability mapped in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under drought stress Theor Appl Genet 2000 100 1197 1202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001220051424 Wasson JJ Schumacher R Wicks TE Maize water content and solute potential at three stages of development Maydica 2000 45 67 72 Weber CR Moorthy BR Heritable and nonheritable relationships and variability of oil content and agronomic characters in the F2 generation of soybean crosses Agron J 1952 44 202 209 http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400040010x Yadav TP Singh RD Bhat JS Genetic studies under different levels of moisture stress in maize (Zea mays L.) Indian J Genet Plant Breed 2003 63 119 123 Yordanov I Velikova V Tsonev T Plant responses to drought, acclimation and stress tolerance Photosynthetica 2000 38 171 186 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007201411474