In direct seeded rice (DSR) cultivation, weed is the major constraint mainly due to absence of puddling in field. The yield loss due to weed interference is huge, may be up to 100%. In this perspective, the present experiment was conducted to study the efficacy of selected herbicides, and to predict the rice yield using artificial neural network (ANN) models. The dry weight and density of weeds were recorded at different growth stages and consequently herbicide efficacy was evaluated. Experimental results revealed that pre-emergence (PRE) herbicide effectively controlled the germination of grassy weeds. Application bispyribac-sodium as post-emergence (POST) following PRE herbicides (clomazone or pendimethalin) or as tank-mixture with clomazone effectively reduced the density and biomass accumulation of diverse weed flora in DSR. Herbicidal treatments improved the plant height, yield attributes and grain yield (2.7 to 5.5 times) over weedy check. The sensitivity of the best ANN model clearly depicts that the weed control index (WCI) of herbicides was most important than their weed control efficiency (WCE). Besides, the early control of weeds is a better prescription to improve rice yield. Differences in sensitivity values of WCI and WCE across the crop growth stages also suggest that at 15, 30 and 60 days after sowing, herbicides most effectively controlled sedges, broad leaves and grasses, respectively. Based on the grain yield and herbicidal WCE, it can be concluded that the combined application of pendimethalin or clomazone as PRE followed by bispyribac-sodium as POST or tank-mixture of clomazone + bispyribac sodium can effectively control different weed flushes throughout the crop growth period in DSR.
Additional key wordsOryza sativadirect-seeded riceweedherbicideartificial neural networkAbbreviations usedANN (artificial neural network)DAS (days after sowing)DSR (direct seeded rice)EPOST (early post-emergence)MLP (multilayer perceptron)POST (post-emergence)PRE (pre-emergence)TPR (transplanted rice)WCE (weed control efficiency)WCI (weed control index)The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Authors’ contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: DG and UPS. Performed the experiments: DG, UPS and AD. Analyzed the data: DG, KR and AD. Wrote the paper: DG and KR.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
An estimated 106.19·106 t rice (Oryzasativa L.) production from an area of 43.95·106 ha has made India rank second (after China) among global rice producers (GOI, 2014). Rice is the most important staple crop for more than half of the population in India. The most common growing method of rice is manual transplanting of seedlings in puddled soils, creating a hard pan below the plough layer. This practice involves both water (3000-5000 L of water to produce 1 kg rice) (Bouman et al., 2002) and human labour resource both of which are becoming increasingly meager. It influences soil health owing to dispersion of soil particles and consequent compaction of the soil (Chauhan et al., 2012). In addition, this conventional puddled transplanted rice (TPR) is not much relevant in the changing climatic scenario. It has a substantial contribution to the greenhouse gases emission, particularly methane (CH4) (Pathak, 2013). These above situations have compelled scientists and researchers towards direct-seeded rice (DSR) cultivation, as it does not need puddling and transplanting and is a feasible alternative to save water and labour. In Indian sub-continent, farmers generally do the direct seeding in dry condition. This is owing to the absence of suitable rice varieties for direct seeding in over-flooded situation. On the other hand, several varieties viz. ‘Narendra 97’, ‘Narendra 118’,‘Sarju 52’, ‘NDR 359’, ‘Sambha mahsuri’, ‘Swarna mahsuri’, ‘Krishna Hans’, ‘PRH 10’, and ‘Rajshree’ have been reported to be largely used by farmers for direct seeding in dry conditions (Pathak et al., 2011; Singh et al., 2012).
But this is just one side of the shield. When farmers shift to DSR from TPR, the weed flora changes drastically (Rao et al., 2007). DSR fields are more species-rich with greater diversity in weed flora than TPR fields (Tomita et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2008; Kamoshita et al., 2010) due to simultaneous germination of weeds with rice in absence of standing water to suppress weed growth (Chauhan & Johnson, 2010). The main weed species associated with rice crop in DSR are Echinochloa colona (L.) Link, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv and Cyperus iria Linn, Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers, Caesulia axillaris, Commelina benghalensis Linn, Phyllanthus niruri Linn, Eclipta alba (L.) Hassk, and Physalis minima (Gupta et al., 2006; Pathak et al., 2011). Yield loss in DSR due to weed interference may be up to 100% (Singh et al., 2014). The species composition change of the accompanying weed flora and also the rapid shift in weed flora is a crucial problem with DSR. The ingression of annual grasses and perennial sedges presents particular menace in weed management with continuous direct seeding. Different weed control measures have been practiced previously to minimize weed pressure in DSR (Chauhan et al., 2010). Among them, chemical control is the most commonly used, and has been proved reliable by several workers for controlling weeds in DSR (DeDatta & Baltazar, 1996; Labrada, 1996; Zhang, 1996). Application of herbicides effectively suppresses weeds and provides DSR with a weed-free environment (Gitsopoulos & Froud-Williams, 2004). So, to effectively control the weed problem and also to harness the fullest benefit of DSR system, the use of herbicides at a right application rate and time is very important at this time. Several pre-emergence or PRE and post-emergence or POST herbicides are now available and being used by farmers in various Asian countries (Ahmed & Chauhan, 2014). Among them, pendimethalin is a soil applied pre-emergence herbicide. It is absorbed by roots and coleoptiles and inhibits cell division and cell elongation (Pathak et al., 2011). Oxadiazon is an inhibitor of protoporphyrinogen oxidase enzyme (Jung & Kuk, 2007). Clomazone, a soil-applied pre-emergence herbicide, has been reported to interfere with chloroplast development in susceptible species (Ferhatoglu & Barrett, 2006). Ethoxysulfuron is used as early post emergence for controlling broadleaved weeds and sedges, and mainly taken by roots and leaves and translocated within the plants (Pathak et al., 2011). As a post-emergence herbicide, azimsulfuron is absorbed by roots and leaves, and also inhibits the enzyme acetolactate sysnthase in susceptible weed plants (Pathak et al., 2011). Similar mode of action has also been reported for another two post emergence herbicides viz. pyrazosulfuron (Wang et al., 2013) and bispyribac-sodium (Jabran et al., 2012).
Several experiments have been conducted in last decades to enlighten the effect of combined application of PRE and POST herbicides on controlling weeds in DSR systems. Pre-emergence application of pendimethalin followed by post-emergence application of bispyribac-sodium at 15 days after sowing (DAS) was most effective for controlling weeds in DSR (Mahajan et al., 2009). In another study, application of oxadiazon at 2 DAS followed by fenoxaprop + ethoxysulfuron applied at 28 DAS fetched the best result in DSR (Chauhan & Opena, 2013). Tank mix applications of azimsulfuron +fenoxaprop, or azimsulfuron +bispyribac sodium +fenoxaprop have been reported to effectively control weed and help crop to yield better than single herbicide application in DSR (Mahajan & Chauhan, 2015).
Modeling crop-weed competition for estimating yield loss is an integral part of weed management (Swanton & Weise, 1991; Swanton et al., 1999). To derive accurate physical meaning involved in yield, use of data mining techniques such as artificial neural network (ANN) is a new trend (Nourani & Fard, 2012). The ANN, without considering any initial supposition and previous knowledge of relations among studied parameters, is able to find existed relation between input and output data to predict each output with its corresponding input. Keeping this above matters in mind, we laid out our field experiment with two basic objectives: (a) to estimate the effect of few selected herbicide protocols in reducing population and biomass of different weed flora and ultimately ensuring crop growth and yield, and (b) to predict the rice yield on the basis of weed control efficiency (WCE) and weed control index (WCI) of the selected herbicides at crop growing periods.
Material and methodsStudy site and soil
The field experiment was conducted for 3 years (2009, 2010 and 2011) at the Agricultural Research Farm, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, UP, India (25°18’ N, 83°30’ E, and 129 m asl), situated at Indo Gangetic Plain of India. The climate of the area is sub-tropical, with an average annual rainfall of 1100 mm (86% of which is received during South-West monsoon from third week of June to September) and potential evapotranspiration of 1500 mm. The hottest months are May and June, when the maximum temperature reaches 42-43°C, whereas, during December and January, the coldest months of the year, the minimum temperature often goes below 8°C. The soil at the study site had a sandy-clay loam texture with pH of 7.4, low in organic carbon (0.42%), available N (221 kg/ha) and available P (41 kg P2O5/ha), and medium in available K (223 kg K2O/ha).
Experimental design and treatment
The field trial was arranged as a randomized complete block design with eight weed control treatments (Table 1) replicated three times, the area of each plot was 24 m2 (6.0 m × 4.0 m). Treatments included different rate of clomazone as pre-emergence (PRE), tank mixture application of clomazone in combination with propanil or bispyribac-sodium as early post-emergence (EPOST) and sequential application of clomazone and pendimethalin as PRE followed by bispyribac-sodium application as post-emergence (POST). The field was irrigated to promote weed germination and then weeds were eliminated 7 days before seeding using glyphosate. The herbicides were applied with a knapsack sprayer that delivered ~ 500 L/ha spray solution through flat fan nozzles. For the weed-free treatment, six hand-weedings were done to maintain a weed-free situation. In the weedy control, no weeding was done.
Treatment details.
Crop management
The field was prepared by giving two plowings, one with cultivator and another with rotavator. Rice (cv. Sarju-52) was dry-seeded at 30 kg/ha with tractor-mounted seed-cum-fertilizer drill. Each year, rice was sown in rows 18.5 cm apart at a depth of 2-3 cm on June and harvested manually with sickle at a height of 25-30 cm from ground level in early November. The field was surface-irrigated after the rice seeding for uniform germination, and visited regularly to check the irrigation demand of the crop according to the crop and soil conditions. Nitrogen was applied at 120 kg/ha in three splits, 1/3 each as basal, at 28 DAS (tillering) and at 60 DAS (panicle initiation). Phosphorus at 60 kg/ha as P2O5 was applied with the zero-till cum fertilizer drill machine during seeding. Potassium at 60 kg/ha as K2O was broadcast uniformly before rice seeding.
Measurements and data analysis
For weed count and weed biomass, four permanent quadrats (0.5 m × 0.5 m) were earmarked in each plot after rice sowing. Weed density were measured at 12 and 30 DAS from four permanent quadrats and weed dry weight data were measured at 30 DAS from two quadrats and sorted into three categories: grasses, sedges and broadleaved. Individual species wise weed counts and dry weight at 60 DAS was taken from two remaining quadrats. For dry weight weeds were cut at ground level and washed with tap water, sun dried, hot-air oven-dried at 70°C for 48 h, and then weighed. At crop harvest stage, only weed biomass was determined from 1.0 m2 of remaining areas (excluding the area of previous four quadrats). Rice plant stands were counted at 12 DAS from quadrats placed randomly at four spots in each plot. Rice grain yield was determined from the harvested area (15 m2) and converted to t/ha at 14% moisture content. The weed control efficiency (WCE) and weed control index (WCI) were calculated using the following formula (ISA, 2009):
where WDC and WDT are weed density in control and herbicide-treated plots, respectively.
where WDMC and WDMT are weed dry matter in control and herbicide-treated plots, respectively.
Statistical methodologies
The data of actual weed population and dry weight were transformed by square root transformation due to high variance for statistical analysis. The statistical analysis of data was done using SAS Windows 9.3. The effect of the years was non-significant and there were no significant interactions between treatments and years. Therefore, the data were combined over the years and subjected to ANOVA. Treatment means were separated with the use of Tukey’s Honest Significant Difference test at the 5% level of significance. The best model for predicting yield from inputs (WCE and WCI at different DAS) has been explored through artificial neural network (Chester, 1993) in SPSS 21.0.
For ANN, WCE and WCI of treatments for grass, sedge, broad leaf and three most prominent individual grassy weeds (E. colona, E. crus-galli and C. iria) at different periods within the crop-weed competition period were taken as inputs of the model and rice yield as the output of the model. Multilayer perceptron (MLP) networks with various numbers of layers and neurons in each layer were employed to predict the yield. As driving function for hidden and output layer, hyperbolic tangent and sigmoid functions were used in different combinations. Data were randomly classified in three groups. Of total data, the training group had 60%, cross validation 20%, and testing group had the rest. Gradient-descent training algorithm was used and thus the network weights were moved along negative of the gradient of the driving function.
To measure the strength of the relationship between variables, the coefficient of determination (R2) was estimated for models (Khoshnevisan et al., 2013). To indicate the prediction error and objectively evaluate the best network created, the statistical indices of Phonglosa et al. (2015) were used. The importance of independent variables was determined to estimate the sensitivity of each predictor in determining the neural network.
ResultsWeed density and biomass
Experimental results revealed that the weed control treatments had significant effect on weed diversity. The PRE herbicides had a significant negative effect on grassy weed germination, but they did not have any consequence on the germination of C. iria and the results in case of broad leaves were erratic (Table 2). The density and biomass of grasses with all the weed control treatments at 30 DAS were significantly lower than those of the weedy check. Bispyribac-sodium applied as EPOST and POST significantly reduced the density and dry-biomass accumulation of C. iria at 30 DAS (Table 2). Among the weed management practices the lower density and dry biomass of broad leaved weeds were observed when the bispyribac-sodium was applied as sequential application after PRE herbicides (Table 2). This remarks the existence of a combination effect of PRE and POST herbicides that broadened the weed control spectrum. PRE herbicides followed by bispyribac-sodium as POST and clomazone+propanil as EPOST effectively reduced the density of E. colona at 60 DAS. But the lowest dry biomass accumulated by E. colona was recorded from the sequential application of clomazone as PRE and bispyribac-sodium as POST. Among the herbicide treatments lower density and dry biomass of E. crus-galli and C. iria was observed from bispyribac-sodium treated plots. Herbicide-treated plots recorded statistically lower total weed density and dry biomass at 60 DAS as compared to the weedy check. Among the herbicide-treated plots the lowest weed biomass at harvest was found from the sequential application of clomazone as PRE and bispyribac-sodium as POST (Table 3).
Effect of different treatments on weed density and dry biomass accumulation (pooled data of 3 years).
Effect of different treatments on weed density at 60 DAS and dry biomass accumulation at 60 DAS and harvest (pooled data of 3years).
Rice emergence and yield-related traits
Rice plant stands differed significantly among the weed control treatments (Table 4). The PRE herbicides had negative effect on rice emergence. Among the PRE herbicides clomazone had more detrimental effect on germination of rice as compared to pendimethalin, but the EPOST application of clomazone did not show any negative impact on crop stand. The dry matter accumulated by the rice plant during the maximum tillering stage (45 DAS) was significantly higher in all the herbicide treatments as compared to the zero-herbicide plot (weedy) (Table 4). The height of the rice plant did not differ statistically among the weed control measures at 45 and 60 DAS (Table 4), but during the final crop growth stage a wide variation was found among the herbicide treatments. At harvest the maximum plant height was recorded when clomazone was applied as EPOST in combination with bispyribac-sodium as a tank mixture. On the other hand, the smallest rice plant was observed in the weedy check.
Effect of different treatments on plant growth, yield attributes and yield (pooled data of 3 years).
Rice panicles per unit area, grains per panicle and test weight (1000 grain weight) were influenced by the herbicide application, and the weedy plots had the lowest number of panicles among the treatments (Table 4). The sequential and tank-mixture application of herbicides produced higher panicles per unit area, grains per panicle and test weight among different weed control measures.
A wide variation in rice grain yield was observed among different the weed management practices (Table 4). There was ~86% grain yield loss in the weedy check due to severe weed infestation as compared to the weed-free plots. Moreover, the application of different herbicides rectified the damaging effects of the weed infestation on the productivity of direct-seeded rice. The herbicide-treated plots produced significantly higher rice grain yield as compared to weedy situation. The weed free plots recorded maximum grain yield and none of the herbicide-treated plots was at par with it. Among the herbicides when bispyribac-sodium was applied as POST following the PRE herbicides or in combination with clomazone as tank mixture recorded significantly higher rice grain yield.
Rice yield modeling through artificial neural network
WCE and WCI of the herbicides at different dates of observation were considered as inputs and yield as the output of the model. MLP network with various numbers of layers and neurons in each layer was constructed to predict the yield; and the topology of the ANN models is shown in Table 5. As we attempted a lot of combinations in hidden layer neurons and hidden and output layer functions, it was not possible to list all of them in the table. So, only twelve models with closer values of MAE, MSE, RMSE, MRE and R2 have been catalogued in Table 5.
Network performance of rice yield for different arrangement in the first (NH1) and second (NH2) hidden layers with different number of neurons in hidden layers (based on mean data of three years) using gradient descent optimization algorithm.
The best model for predicting yield was one input layer having seventeen neurons, two hidden layers with nine neurons in the first one and four neurons in the second one, and an output layer (structure 17-9-4-1; model 10; Table 5). The best model for yield prediction was selected on the basis of its lowest error values and highest R2 value. Scatter plot of predicted yield against actual values is shown in Fig. 1 for the testing data set which clearly denotes that 88% of the predicted yield in our case can be explained from actual yield calculated from field experiment.
Scatter plot of actual and predicted rice yield for the testing data set.
To evaluate the predictive ability of the ANN, sensitivity analysis was done for the best network (Table 6). The robustness of the model was determined by examining and comparing the output produced during validation with the calculated values. Models were trained by withdrawing each input item one at a time while not changing any of the other items for every pattern. A perusal of the data presented in Table 6 clearly gives an estimation of the contribution of WCE and WCI of different treatments on predicted output (rice yield). Based on the importance value, the WCE for sedges at 15 DAS had higher sensitivity for rice yield than the grasses and broad leaves. WCI had greater importance than WCE for different category of weeds at different crop growth stages. At 30 DAS, both the WCI and WCE for broad leaves were highly sensitive for grain yield of rice. The WCE and WCI at 30 DAS for different categories of weeds had higher importance values as compared to those at 60 DAS for different weeds. At 60 DAS, among all weed species, WCE for E. colona and WCI for E. crus-galli showed higher sensitivity towards rice grain yield.
Sensitivity of different inputs (weed control efficiency= WCE; weed control index = WCI) for rice yield (based on mean data of three years).
Discussion
Weeds are important biotic constrict if not controlled timely by adopting proper management practices in zero-till direct seeded rice, and it can impose a serious threat to the productivity and sustainability of DSR (Rao et al., 2007; Farooq et al., 2011b). In our study under the un-weeded situation E. colona, E. crus-galli and C. iria were the main dominant weeds, comprising 89% of total weed density (Table 3). The dominance of E. colona can be attributed to simultaneous germination of this species along with rice seeds under favorable soil moisture and temperature. Saini & Angiras (2002) and Singh et al. (2003) also reported dominance of grassy weeds over other species in DSR. The application of PRE herbicide was found to be most effective against germination of grassy weeds in DSR. According to an earlier study, the application of PRE herbicide effectively reduced the grassy weeds emergence in rice (Chauhan & Opena, 2013). From this study it is comprehensible that only PRE herbicide application was not adequate to manage the weed flora in direct seeded rice. In DSR, due to favorable situation, weeds show several cohorts. Thus when bispyribac-sodium was applied as POST following PRE herbicides or as tank-mix with clomazone as EPOST effectively controlled the subsequent weed cohorts and provided a better environment for crop growth. Application of herbicides in sequence (PRE followed by POST) or as tank-mixture performed better against diverse weed flora as compared to single herbicide by providing more than one technical molecule against a diverse group of weeds (Chauhan, 2013; Antralina et al., 2015). In direct-seeded rice the control of different weed cohorts is largely dependent on the performance and persistence of herbicides in active form (Mahajan & Chauhan, 2013).
The PRE herbicides, mainly clomazone, had some inhibitory effect on rice seedling emergence. Andres et al. (2013) also evaluated the selectivity of clomazone on rice, and found that the application of clomazone as PRE caused high rice injury at the initial crop growth stage. The adoption of proper weed management practices in DSR can provide a better environment for crop growth and productivity. The application of PRE herbicides followed by bispyribac-sodium and tank-mixture of clomazone+bispyribac-sodium contributed to a sizeable improvement in plant growth (plant height and biomass accumulation) and all other yield traits, like the number of productive tillers, grains per panicle and the test weight. Many reports support the role of herbicide application in improving the yield and yield-related traits of several crops through efficient weed management (Jabran et al., 2008; Razzaq et al., 2010; Farooq et al., 2011a). The improvement in the crop growth and yield attributes was positively associated with reduced weed density and biomass because of efficient weed control. Reduction in weed density vis-à-vis weed biomass provides more utilization of space, water, light and nutrients by the crop, and thus ultimately results in escalated crop yield through better photosynthesis and overall growth and metabolic activities of the crop. Walia (2006) opined, in similar manner, that the greatest loss caused by the weeds resulted from their competition with crop for growth factors viz., nutrients, soil moisture, light, or space.
The ANN models were used to precisely predict the grain yield using herbicidal efficacy as inputs of the model. As mentioned earlier, the best model was selected considering the highest R2 and the lowest error values. Further the importance values of the parameters in case of the best ANN model were used to validate the role of WCE and WCI of selected herbicides in increasing rice yield. Considering the sensitivity values of the best ANN model, it can be inferred that the effective control of weeds by way of curbing their dry matter production and density through efficient use of herbicides at peak crop-weed competition period (30 DAS) may increase the rice yield and reduce the yield loss caused by those weeds. To evaluate any weed management practices, weed dry weight is the main realistic information as compared to weed density as the former is more indicative of the competitive nature of weed. The early weed competition reduces crop yield far greater than late season weed growth. So, controlling weeds at early crop growth stages provide a better environment for crop growth and yield. The sensitivity values of WCI and WCE differed across the crop growth stages. At 15, 30 and 60 DAS, herbicides most effectively controlled sedges, broad leaves and grasses, respectively. Such findings also suggest the combined application of PRE followed by POST herbicide or tank-mixed herbicide for effectively controlling different weed flushes throughout the crop growth period in case of DSR system.
In summary, in direct-seeded rice cultivation, the problem of weed infestation causes drastic yield reduction; and the situation needs a suitable solution with efficient weed management strategy. The present experiment had an intention to discern the effectiveness of herbicides of various modes of action either alone or in combination. It was noticed that the combined effect of PRE and POST herbicides and application of herbicides as tank mix broadened the weed control spectrum in this study. Such type of combination helped decreasing the weed density and biomass and as a consequence augmented rice yield. Modeling rice yield through artificial neural network also reflected the manifest role of the combined (PRE followed by POST) or tank-mixed applications of herbicides in decreasing weed density and biomass and subsequent yield improvement.
ReferencesAhmedSChauhanBSPerformance of different herbicides in dry-seeded rice in BangladeshSci World J201472941814AndresAConcencoGTheisenGVidottoFFerreroASelectivity and weed control efficacy of pre- and post-emergence applications of clomazone in Southern BrazilCrop Prot201353103108http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.06.012AntralinaMIstinaINYuwariahYSimarmataTEffect of difference weed control methods to yield of lowland rice in the SOBARIProc Food Sci20153323329http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2015.01.035BoumanBAMHengsdijkHHardyBBindrabanPSTuongTPLadhaJKWater-wise rice productionProc Int Workshop on Water-Wise Rice Production8-11 AprilLos Baños, PhilippinesInternational Rice Research Institute2002ChauhanBSEffect of tillage systems, seeding rates, and herbicides on weed growth and grain yield in dry-seeded rice systems in the PhilippinesCrop Prot201354244250http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.09.001ChauhanBSJohnsonDEThe role of seed ecology in improving weed management strategies in the tropicsAdv Agron2010105221262http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05006-6ChauhanBSOpenaJWeed management and grain yield of rice sown at low seeding rates in mechanized dry-seeded systemsField Crops Res2013141915http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.002ChauhanBSMigoTWestermanPRJohnsonDEPost-dispersal predation of weed seeds in rice fieldsWeed Res201050553560http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00807.xChauhanBSSinghRGMahajanGEcology and management of weeds under conservation agriculture: a reviewCrop Prot2012385765http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.010ChesterJNeural networks, a tutorial1993Prentice HallNYDeDattaSKBaltazarAAuldBKimKUWeed control technology as a component of rice production systemsWeed management in rice1996FAO Plant Prod Protect Paper1392552FarooqMSiddiqueKHMRehmanHMUAzizTLeeDWahidARice direct seeding: experiences, challenges and opportunitiesSoil Till Res20111118798http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.10.008FarooqMFlowerKCJabranKWahidASiddiqueKHMCrop yield and weed management in rainfed conservation agricultureSoil Till Res2011117172183http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.10.001FerhatogluYBarrettMStudies of clomazone mode of actionPesticide Biochem Physiol200685714http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.10.002GitsopoulosTKFroud-WilliamsRJEffects of oxadiargyl on direct-seeded rice and Echinochloa crus-galli under aerobic and anaerobic conditionsWeed Res200444329334http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2004.00407.xGOIAgricultural statistics at a glance 20142014Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Department of Agriculture & Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Indiahttp://eands.dacnet.nic.in/PDF/Agricultural-Statistics-At-Glance2014.pdf [Accessed: 03.04.2015]GuptaRKLadhaJKSinghSSinghRGJatMLSaharawatYSinghVPSinghSSSinghGSahGProduction technology for direct-seeded rice. Rice-Wheat Consortium for the Indo-Gangetic Plains, New Delhi, IndiaTechnical Bulletin2006816ISAAgronomic terminology20095319Ind Soc Agron, Ind Agric Res InstNew Delhirev. ed.JabranKCheemaZAFarooqMBasraSMAHussainMRehmanHTank mixing of allelopathic crop water extracts with pendimethalin helps in the management of weeds in canola (Brassica napus) fieldInt J Agric Biol200810293296JabranKEhsanullahEHussainMFarooqMBabarMDoğanMNLeeDJApplication of bispyribac-sodium provides effective weed control in direct-planted rice on a sandy loam soilWeed Biol Manage201212136145http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2012.00446.xJungHIKukYIResistance mechanisms in protoporphyrinogen oxidase (PROTOX) inhibitor-resistant transgenic riceJ Plant Biol200750586594http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03030713KamoshitaAIkedaHYamagishiJOukMEcophysiological study on weed seed banks and weeds in Cambodian paddy fields with contrasting water availabilityWeed Biol Manage201010261272http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2010.00393.xKhoshnevisanBRafieeSOmidMYousefiMMovahediMModeling of energy consumption and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions in wheat production in Esfahan province of Iran using artificial neural networksEnergy201352333338http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.01.028LabradaRAuldBKimKUWeed control in riceWeed management in rice1996FAO Plant Prod Protect13935MahajanGChauhanBSThe role of cultivars in managing weeds in dry-seeded rice production systemsCrop Prot2013495257http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2013.03.008MahajanGChauhanBSWeed control in dry direct-seeded rice using tank mixtures of herbicides in South AsiaField Crops Res2015729096http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.03.002MahajanGChauhanBSJohnsonDEWeed management in aerobic rice in northwestern Indo-Gangetic plainsJ Crop Improve200923366382http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15427520902970458NouraniVFardMSSensitivity analysis of the artificial neural network out-puts in simulation of the evaporation process at different climatologic regimesAdv Eng Soft201247127146http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.12.014PathakHGreenhouse gas mitigation in Indian agricultureAnn Agric Res20133499105PathakHTewariANSankhyanSDubeyDSMinaUSinghVKJainNBhatiaADirect-seeded rice: Potential, performance and problems - A reviewCurr Adv Agric Sci201137788PhonglosaABhattacharyyaKRayKMandalJPariABanerjeeHChattopadhyayAIntegrated nutrient management for okra in an inceptisol of eastern India and yield modeling through artificial neural networkSci Hortic-Amsterdam201518719http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.02.037RaoANJohnsonDESivaprasadBLadhaJKMortimerAMWeed management in direct-seeded riceAdv Agron200793153255http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)93004-1RazzaqACheemaZAJabranKFarooqMKhaliqAHaiderGWeed management in wheat through combination of allelopathic water extracts with reduced doses of herbicidesPakistan J Weed Sci Res201016247256SainiJPAngirasNNEvaluation of ethoxysulfuron against broad-leaved weeds and sedges in direct seeded puddled riceInd J Weed Sci2002343638SinghMBhullarMSChauhanBSThe critical period for weed control in dry-seeded riceCrop Prot2014668085http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.08.009SinghNSinghBRaiABDubeyAKRaiAImpact of direct seeded rice (DSR) for resource conservationInd Res J Exten Edu2012269SinghSSinghHNarwalSMalikRKEvaluation of Alkomba and tank mixture of Almix + Bulachlor for control of weeds in transplanted riceInd J Weed Sci2003352426SinghSLadhaJKGuptaRKBhushanLRaoANWeed management in aerobic rice systems under varying establishment methodsCrop Prot200827660671http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2007.09.012SwantonCJWeiseSFIntegrated weed management: the rationale and approachWeed Tech19915657663SwantonCJWeaverSCowanPVan AckerRDeenWShreshtaAWeed thresholdsJ Crop Prod19992929http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J144v02n01_02TomitaSMiyagawaSKonoYNoichanaCInamuraTNagataYSributtaANawataERice yield losses by competition with weeds rainfed paddy fields in north-east ThailandWeed Biol Manage20033162171http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1445-6664.2003.00101.xWaliaUSWeed management2006Kalyani PublNew DelhiWangYDuLRaiLPhotochemical degradation of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl in aqueous solutionJ Braz Chem Soc2013242631http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532013000100005ZhangZAuldBKimKUWeed management in transplanted riceWeed Management in Rice1996FAO Plant Prod Protect Paper1397586