Is social sustainability relevant for food consumers? Evidence from Chile
Abstract
Aim of study: To examine consumer preferences in Chile, an emerging market, for cheese that emphasizes social sustainability features.
Area of study: Chilean consumers.
Material and methods: Three characteristics were included in the choice experiment: price, social sustainability (adherence to labor laws), and cheese type (Gouda, Chanco, and Artisanal cheese), each with three levels. A face-to-face questionnaire was administered to a representative sample of Chilean customers in order to collect data. To evaluate the effect, relevance, and main determinants of choice, a conditional logit model was employed.
Main results: The more attributes are at their most desirable levels, the more likely the cheese will be chosen. Therefore, the most sought-after cheese is that which is inexpensive, conforms to all labor laws, and is of the Chanco variety. When one or more of these three attributes are not at their most desirable level, then price (the lowest) is the attribute that governs the choice, followed by the social sustainability attribute (higher levels of compliance with labor legislation) and, finally, the type of cheese. In terms of socioeconomic variables, older consumers and those with higher education explain a greater preference for the social sustainability attribute over the type of cheese.
Research highlights: These results highlight the importance that social sustainability can have on companies to make their products preferred by consumers. This is the first study to examine the Chilean food industry's social sustainability attribute.
Downloads
References
Aoki K, Akai K, Ujiie K, 2017. A choice experiment to compare preferences for rice in Thailand and Japan: The impact of origin, sustainability, and taste. Food Qual Prefer 56: 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.03.001
Asioli D, Aschemann-Witzel J, Nayga RM, Jr, 2020. Sustainability-related food labels. Ann Rev Resour Econ 12: 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094103
Bangsa AB, Schlegelmilch BB, 2020. Linking sustainable product attributes and consumer decision-making: Insights from a systematic review. J Clean Prod 245: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118902
Bastounis A, Buckell J, Hartmann-Boyce J, Cook B, King S, Potter C, et al, 2021. The impact of environmental sustainability labels on willingness-to-pay for foods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of discrete choice experiments. Nutrients 13(8): 2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082677
Brundtland Commission, 1987. Our common future. Oxford; UK: Oxford University Press.
Carroll AB, 1999. Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Busin Soc 38(3): 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303
Claro DP, Laban Neto SA, De Oliveira Claro PB, 2013. Sustainability drivers in food retail. J Retail Consum Serv 20(3): 365-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.02.003
De Magistris T, Del Giudice T, Verneau F, 2015. The effect of information on willingness to pay for canned tuna fish with different corporate social responsibility (CSR) certification: A pilot study. J Consum Affairs 49(2): 457-471. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12046
Del Giudice T, Stranieri S, Caracciolo F, Ricci EC, Cembalo L, Banterle A, et al, 2018. Corporate social responsibility certifications influence consumer preferences and seafood market price. J Clean Prod 178: 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.276
Echeverría R, Montenegro AB, Albarrán ES, Charry L, 2022. Consumer willingness to pay for cheese with a social sustainability attribute. Ciência Rural 52(5): e20210281. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210281
Fernández G, Farías G, 2019. Descripción de la cadena láctea en Chile. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias - ODEPA. Santiago, Chile.
Fernqvist F, Ekelund L, 2014. Credence and the effect on consumer liking of food - A review. Food Qual Prefer 32: 340-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.10.005
García Navarro V, Granda Revilla G, 2020. La incorporación de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible como factor de competitividad empresarial. ICE Sostenibilidad para la Competividad 912: 75-86. https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2020.912.6963
Ghvanidze S, Velikova N, Dodd T, Oldewage-Theron W, 2017. A discrete choice experiment of the impact of consumers' environmental values, ethical concerns, and health consciousness on food choices. Brit Food J 119(4): 863-881. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2016-0342
Grankvist G, Johnsen SÅK, Hanss D, 2019. Values and willingness-to-pay for sustainability-certified mobile phones. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 26(7): 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2019.1652212
Grunert KG, Hieke S, Wills J, 2014. Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy 44: 177-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.12.001
Haab, T, McConnell, K, 2002. Valuing environmental and natural resources. the econometric of non-market valuation. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781840647044.00014
Imami D, Skreli E, Zhllima E, Canavari M, Chan C, Cela A, 2016. Analysis of consumers' preferences for typical local cheese in Albania applying conjoint analysis. New Medit 15(3): 49-55. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017153-9889
ISO-OECD, 2017. ISO 26000 and OECD guidelines practical overview of the linkages. https://www.iso.org/publication/PUB100418.html.
Kos Skubic M, Erjavec K, Klopčič M, 2018. Consumer preferences regarding national and EU quality labels for cheese, ham and honey: The case of Slovenia. Brit Food J 120(3): 650-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-04-2017-0236
Lancaster K, 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74: 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
Long M, Murray D, 2012. Ethical consumption, values convergence/divergence and community development. J Agr Environ Ethics 26: 351-375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-012-9384-0
Louviere J, Flynn TN, Carson RT, 2010. Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. J Choice Model 3(3): 57-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70014-9
Louviere JJ, Hensher D, Swait J, 2000. Stated choice methods: analysis and application. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UK. 399 pp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831
Mazzocchi C, Sali G, 2022. Supporting mountain agriculture through 'Mountain Product' label: A choice experiment approach. Environ Dev Sust 24: 701-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01464-3
Menozzi D, Yeh CH, Cozzi E, Arfini F, 2022. Consumer preferences for cheese products with quality labels: The case of Parmigiano Reggiano and Comté. Animals 12(10): 1299. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101299
Miller S, Tait P, Saunders C, Dalziel P, Rutherford P, Abell W, 2017. Estimation of consumer willingness-to-pay for social responsibility in fruit and vegetable products: A cross-country comparison using a choice experiment. J Consum Behav 16(6): e13-e25. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1650
Nurse Rainbolt G, Onozaka Y, Mcfadden DT, 2012. Consumer motivations and buying behavior: The case of the local food system movement. J Food Prod Market 18(5): 385-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/10454446.2012.685031
O'Callaghan KA, Kerry JP, 2016. Consumer attitudes towards the application of smart packaging technologies to cheese products. Food Pack Shelf Life 9: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2016.05.001
ODEPA, 2017. Estrategia de sustentabilidad para el sector lechero. https://www.odepa.gob.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/LecheSustentable.pdf
ODEPA, 2023. Estadísticas productivas. Cifras lácteas. https://www.odepa.gob.cl/estadisticas-del-sector/estadisticas-productivas.
Onozaka Y, Mcfadden DT, 2011. Does local labeling complement or compete with other sustainable labels? A conjoint analysis of direct and joint values for fresh produce claim. Am J Agr Econ 93(3): 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar005
Peña-Torres J, Dosque P, 2019. La industria lechera en Chile: Análisis de temas de libre competencia. Documento de trabajo N°3. Centro Latinoamericano de Políticas Económicas y Sociales - CLAPES UC. Santiago, Chile.
Peralta G, Fuentes O, 2023. Mercado nacional de la leche y productos lácteos. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias - ODEPA. Santiago, Chile.
Pilone V, De Lucia C, Del Nobile MA, Contó F, 2015. Policy developments of consumer's acceptance of traditional products innovation: The case of environmental sustainability and shelf life extension of a PGI Italian cheese. Trends Food Sci Technol 41(1): 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.09.005
Piracci G, Boncinelli F, Casini L, 2022. Wine consumers' demand for social sustainability labeling: Evidence for the fair labor claim. Appl Econ Persp Policy 44(4): 1742-1761. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13260
Pomarici E, Vecchio R, 2014. Millennial generation attitudes to sustainable wine: an exploratory study on Italian consumers. J Clean Prod 66: 537-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.058
Ross S, Milne G, 2021. Price? Quality? Or Sustainability? Segmenting by disposition toward self-other tradeoffs predicts consumers' sustainable decision-making. J Bus Ethics 172(5): 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04478-5
Sacchi G, 2018. The ethics and politics of food purchasing choices in Italian consumers' collective action. J Agr Environ Ethics 31(1): 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9710-2
Schäufele I, Hamm U, 2017. Consumers' perceptions, preferences and willingness-to-pay for wine with sustainability characteristics: A review. J Clean Prod 147: 379-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.118
SERNAC, 2015. Determinación de la composición nutricional en quesos gouda, mantecoso y chanco y su contenido de sodio. Informe de Estudio, Servicio Nacional del Consumidor, Chile.
Stiletto A, Trestini S, 2022a. Is it really a piece of cake to label Geographical Indications with the Nutri-Score? Consumers' behaviour and policy implications. PLoS ONE 17(11): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277048
Stiletto A, Trestini S, 2022b. When less isn't more and more isn't less: is there an overlap between "protected designation of origin", "mountain product" and "organic" in Italy? Brit Food J 125(13): 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-02-2022-0107
Tait P, Rutherford P, Driver T, Li X, Saunders C, Dalziel P, 2018. Consumer insights and willingness to pay for attributes New Zealand yogurt products in Shanghai, China. Research report, Lincoln University, Canterbury, N.Z., Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit no. 347. http://natlib.govt.nz/records/40660832
Tait P, Saunders C, Dalziel P, Rutherford P, Driver T, Guenther M, 2019. Estimating wine consumer preferences for sustainability attributes: A discrete choice experiment of Californian Sauvignon Blanc purchasers. J Clean Prod 233: 412-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.076
Tebbe E, von Blanckenburg K, 2018. Does willingness to pay increase with the number and strictness of sustainability labels? Agr Econ 49(1): 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12394
Tobi R, Harris F, Rana R, Brown KA, Quaife M, Green R, 2019. Sustainable diet dimensions. Comparing consumer preference for nutrition, environmental and social responsibility food labelling: A systematic review. Sustainability 11(23): 6575. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236575
Toppinen A, Toivonen R, Valkeapää A, Rämö A, 2013. Consumer perceptions of environmental and social sustainability of wood products in the Finnish market. Scand J Forest Res 28(8): 775-783. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.824021
Toussaint M, Cabanelas P, Blanco-González A, 2020. Social sustainability in the food value chain: An integrative approach beyond corporate social responsibility. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manag 28: 103-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2035
Vecchio R, Annunziata A, 2015. Willingness-to-pay for sustainability-labelled chocolate: an experimental auction approach. J Clean Prod 86: 335-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.006
Waheed A, Zhang Q, Rashid Y, Zaman Khan S, 2020. The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying tendencies from the perspective of stakeholder theory and practices. Corp Soc Resp Environ Manag 27(3): 1307-1315. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1885
Wei W, Kim G, Miao L, Behnke C, Almanza B, 2018. Consumer inferences of corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims on packaged foods. J Bus Res 83: 186-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.10.046
Wirth FF, Stanton JL, Wiley JB, 2016. The relative importance of search versus credence product attributes: Organic and locally grown. Agr Resour Econ Rev 40(1): 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1068280500004512
World-Bank, 2019. World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. World Bank. https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD?locations=CL
Copyright (c) 2024 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
