Charge-to-mass ratio measurement in agricultural electrostatic spraying: critical review and design insights
Abstract
Electrostatic spraying technology has gained significant attention due to its potential to enhance droplet deposition, improve coverage uniformity, and reduce pesticide waste. Accurate evaluation of charging efficiency using standardized apparatuses is essential for optimizing electrostatic spraying systems and enabling consistent comparisons across different studies. This review systematically explores methodologies for measuring the charge-to-mass ratio, with a particular focus on Faraday cages and conductive plates. Key design considerations, such as material selection, geometric configuration, insulation from external influences, and measurement sensitivity, are discussed for their impact on measurement accuracy and reliability. By analyzing these factors, this review contributes to the development of a standardized charge-to-mass ratio measurement system, promoting consistency in evaluating electrostatic spraying technologies. Its novelty lies in the comparative evaluation of existing techniques and the identification of critical parameters influencing measurement reliability. Additionally, this review serves as a practical resource for researchers, especially newcomers, providing guidance on designing and evaluating electrostatic charging systems without requiring extensive experimentation
Downloads
References
Almourrh A, Alsalmo A, Mousa S, AlTaweel K, 2024. Effect of some fungicides on Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycoprsici Colony growth in the laboratory. African J Biol Sci 6(13): 1979–1995. https://doi.org/10.48047/AFJBS.6.13.2024.1979-1995
Almourrh A, Wahab J A, Alsalmo A, Hamijo T, Nawaz H, Kayim M, Arpacı B B, 2025. Comparative Study of Biological and Chemical Control for Fusarium Wilt in Tomato. Diyala Agric Sci J 17: 209–221. https://doi.org/10.52951/dasj.25170116
Alsalmo A, Hamijo T, Kayim M, Al-Mourrh A, 2025. Plant Disease Resistant in the Triticum. In: Triticum - The Pillar of Global Food Security. IntechOpen, pp. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.1009386
Amaya K, 2024. Low-cost high voltage generator for electrostatic charging of pesticide droplets, and laboratory uses. Gazi J Eng Sci 9: 422–434. https://doi.org/10.30855/gmbd.07050776
Amaya K, Bayat A, 2024a. Innovating an electrostatic charging unit with an insulated induction electrode for air-assisted orchard sprayers. Crop Prot. 181: 106701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106701
Amaya K, Bayat A, 2024b. Optimizing Charging Efficiency: The Influence of Electrode Age and Faraday Cage Design on Electrostatic Spraying Systems for Pesticide Application. 4. Bilsel International Çatalhöyük Scientific Researches Congress, Türkiye (Konya), Nov 23–24. pp. 492–501.
Amaya K, Bayat A, 2023. Determining effects of induction electrode geometry on charging efficiency of droplets in pesticide electrostatic spraying applications. Smart Agric Technol 4: 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atech.2023.100190
Blettler D.C, Biurrun Manresa J.A, Fagundez G.A, 2022. A review of the effects of agricultural intensification and the use of pesticides on honeybees and their products and possible palliatives. Spanish J Agric Res 2. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2022204-19516
Cunha J P A R Da, Barizon R R M, Ferracini V L, Assalin M R, 2017. Spray drift and caterpillar and stink bug control from aerial applications with electrostatic charge and atomizer on soybean crop. Eng Agric 37: 1163–1170. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n6p1163-1170/2017
Dai S, Zhang J, Jia W, Ou M, Zhou H, Dong X, Chen H, Wang M, Chen Y, Yang S, 2022. Experimental study on the droplet size and charge-to-mass ratio of an air-assisted electrostatic nozzle. Agriculture 12: 889. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12060889
Durairaj D, Jyoti B, 2023. A method to optimize the pesticide dose considering the combined influence of plant pest pesticide and spray equipment on bioefficacy. Spanish J Agric Res 21: e0208. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2023213-19738
Gan-Mor S, Ronen B, Ohaliav K, 2014. The effect of air velocity and proximity on the charging of sprays from conventional hydraulic nozzles. Biosyst Eng 121: 200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.03.004
Garcia L C, Carraro G H, Felema S, Fornari A J, Sformi L J V, Inagaki T M, 2024. Adjuvants used in fungicide spraying on soybean plants. Spanish J Agric Res 22: e1003. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2024223-20497
Herkins M, Zhao L, Zhu H, Jeon H, Castilho-Theodoro J, 2025. Optimization and Evaluation of Electrostatic Spraying Systems and Their Effects on Pesticide Deposition and Coverage Inside Dense Canopy Plants. Agronomy 15: 1401. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15061401
Hu H, Kaizu Y, Huang J, Furuhashi K, Zhang H, Xiao X, Li M, Imou K, 2022. Design and performance test of a novel UAV air-assisted electrostatic centrifugal spraying system. Int J Agric Biol Eng 15: 34–40. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20221505.6891
Kayim M, Endes A, Alsalmo A, Yasmin S, Nawaz H, 2022. Preliminary evaluation of citrus rootstocks and scions to four different bot canker pathogens. XIV International Citrus Congress, Türkiye (Mersin), Nov 6–11, pp. 403–410.
Krupa A, Jaworek A, Sobczyk A.T, Marchewicz A, Szudyga M, Antes T, 2013. Charged spray generation for gas cleaning applications. J Electrostat 71: 260–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.11.022
Laryea G N, No S Y, 2003. Development of electrostatic pressure-swirl nozzle for agricultural applications. J Electrostat 57: 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3886(02)00122-5
Law S E, Cooper S C, 2024. Standard Methods for Evaluating Electrostatic Spray Charge and Deposition of Conductive Liquids used for Surface Disinfection. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 60(6): 8371–8382. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2024.3457743
Law S E, Cooper S C, 1987. Induction Charging Characteristics of Conductivity Enhanced Vegetable Oil Sprays. Trans Am Soc Agric Eng 30: 75–79. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.30405
Li X, Knight R M, Hocter J, Zhang B, Zhao L, Zhu H, 2022. Effects of electrode materials and dimensions of an electrostatic spray scrubber on water droplet charging for dust removal. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 72: 1442–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2022.2120564
Li Y, Li Q, Hu J, Liu C, Zhao S, Zhang W, Wang Y, 2025. An Experimental Study on the Charging Effects and Atomization Characteristics of a Two-Stage Induction-Type Electrostatic Spraying System for Aerial Plant Protection. Agronomy 15: 1641. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15071641
Mamidi V R, Ghanshyam C, Manoj Kumar P, Kapur P, 2013. Electrostatic hand pressure knapsack spray system with enhanced performance for small scale farms. J Electrostat 71: 785–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2013.01.011
Martin D E, Carlton J B, 2013. Airspeed and orifice size affect spray droplet spectrum from an aerial electrostatic nozzle for fixed-wing applications. Appl Eng Agric 29: 5–10. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.42528
Martin D E, Carlton J B, 2012. Airspeed and orifice size affect spray droplet spectra from an aerial electrostatic nozzle for rotary-wing applications. At Sprays 22: 997–1010. https://doi.org/10.1615/AtomizSpr.2013006280
Page M J, McKenzie J E, Bossuyt P M, Boutron I, Hoffmann T C, Mulrow C D, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J M, Akl E A, Brennan S E, 2021a. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Page M J, Moher D, Bossuyt P M, Boutron I, Hoffmann T C, Mulrow C D, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff J M, Akl E A, Brennan S E, 2021b. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160
Patel M K, Ghanshyam C, Kapur P, 2013. Characterization of electrode material for electrostatic spray charging: Theoretical and engineering practices. J Electrostat 71: 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2012.11.019
Patel M K, Kundu M, Sahoo H K, Nayak M K, 2016a. Enhanced performance of an air-assisted electrostatic nozzle: Role of electrode material and its dimensional considerations in spray charging. Eng Agric Environ Food 9: 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eaef.2016.05.002
Patel M K, Praveen B, Sahoo H K, Patel B, Kumar A, Singh M, Nayak M K, Rajan P, 2017. An advance air-induced air-assisted electrostatic nozzle with enhanced performance. Comput Electron Agric 135: 280–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.010
Patel M K, Sahoo H K, Nayak M K, Ghanshyam C, 2016b. Plausibility of variable coverage high range spraying: Experimental studies of an externally air-assisted electrostatic nozzle. Comput Electron Agric 127: 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2016.07.021
Patel M K, Sahoo H K, Nayak M K, Ghanshyam C, 2015. Electrostatic Nozzle: New Trends in Agricultural Pesticides Spraying. SSRG Int J Electr Electron Eng. April 13–15. pp. 6–11.
Salcedo R, Llop J, Campos J, Costas M, Gallart M, Ortega P, Gil E, 2020. Evaluation of leaf deposit quality between electrostatic and conventional multi-row sprayers in a trellised vineyard. Crop Prot 127: 104964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.104964
Salcedo R, Sánchez E, Zhu H, Fàbregas X, García-Ruiz F, Gil E, 2023. Evaluation of an electrostatic spray charge system implemented in three conventional orchard sprayers used on a commercial apple trees plantation. Crop Prot 167: 106212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106212
Wang S, Li X, Zhou H, Lv X, Shen W, 2021. Design and experiment of an aerial electrostatic spraying system for unmanned agricultural aircraft systems. Appl Eng Agric 36: 955–962. https://doi.org/10.13031/AEA.14150
Xue X, Zeng K, Li N, Luo Q, Ji Y, Li Z, Lyu S, Song S, 2023. Parameters Optimization and Performance Evaluation Model of Air-Assisted Electrostatic Sprayer for Citrus Orchards. Agriculture 13: 1498. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13081498
Zhang L, Li Z, Chu H, Chen Q, Li Y, Liu X, 2025. Design and Evaluation of a Novel Efficient Air-Assisted Hollow-Cone Electrostatic Nozzle. Agriculture 15: 1293. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121293
Zhao D, Cooper S, Chima P, Wang G, Zhang L, Sun B, Zhang X, Lan Y, 2024. Development and Characterization of a Contact-Charging Electrostatic Spray UAV System. Agriculture-Basel 14: 467. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14030467
Zhou H, Ou M, Dong X, Zhou W, Dai S, Jia W, 2024. Spraying performance and deposition characteristics of an improved air-assisted nozzle with induction charging. Front Plant Sci 15: 1309088. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1309088
Zillgitt M, Schmidt E, 2021. Determination of operating parameters for the use of an electrostatically charged water spray mist. Chem Eng Technol 44: 1178–1184. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202100003
Copyright (c) 2026 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
