Relationship between efficiency and profitability: The case of Czech swine sector
Abstract
Aim of study: To examine the link between economic efficiency and profitability of firms belonging to the swine sector.
Area of study: This study is devoted to the Czech swine sector that forms the traditional and essential part of agriculture in the Czech Republic.
Material and methods: Data from the Albertina CZ Gold Edition database for the period 2008-2017 were used. To evaluate the economic efficiency, the data envelopment analysis models are applied. Return on equity, return on assets and return on sales are used to measure profitability. To assess the relationship between economic efficiency and profitability, the Pearson correlation coefficient is used.
Main results: The results demonstrate that there is no clear link between the economic efficiency of firms and their profitability in this industry. The correlation between all three profitability ratios and efficiency score were predominantly positive but not statistically significant in many cases. The economies of scale and scope and the construction of profitability indicators could be the main factors explaining the fact that companies achieving higher efficiency are not also more profitable.
Research highlights: The study provides material useful to owners, managers, and customers of Czech agriculture firms. It identifies the relatively high efficiency of firms measured relatively to the best Czech company. In the European context, however, the efficiency of Czech firms belonging to the swine sector is low. It also reveals that the profitability of the firms is not a representative proxy for economic efficiency.Downloads
References
Aigner DJ, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P, 1977. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econometrics 6: 21-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
Aissa SB, Goaied M, 2016. Determinants of Tunisian hotel profitability: The role of managerial efficiency. Tourism Manage 52: 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.015
Ali M, Byerlee D, 1991. Economic efficiency of small farmers in a changing world: A survey of recent evidence. J Int Dev 31: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.4010030102
Asmild M, Hougaard JL, 2006. Economic versus environmental improvement potentials of Danish pig farms. Agr Econ 352006: 171-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2006.00150.x
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW, 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci 309: 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Barros CP, Alves C, 2003. Hypermarket retail store efficiency in Portugal. Int J Ret Distrib Manage 3111: 549-560. https://doi.org/10.1108/09590550310503285
Bisnode, 2019. Albertina CZ Gold Edition [database on DVD-ROM].
Boudný J, Špička J, 2012. The effect of production efficiency on economic. Result Pig Breed 6: 1-8.
Calafat-Marzal C, Marti-Selva ML, Puertas-Medina R, 2018. Efficiency in the Valencian pig and poultry sector: a non-parametric approximation. Inform Tecn Econ Agrar 114: 61-77. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2018.005
Čechura L, 2010. Estimation of technical efficiency in Czech agriculture with respect to firm heterogeneity. Agr Econ - Czech 56: 183-191. https://doi.org/10.17221/23/2010-AGRICECON
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 26: 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K, 2006. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses. Springer Sci + Business Media Inc, New York.
Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J, 2011. Handbook of data envelopment analysis, 2nd ed. Springer Sci + Business Media Inc., New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8
CSO, 2020. Czech Statistical Office - Food Consumption. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/food-consumption-2018 [Accessed Sep 8, 2020].
Eurostat, 2014. Pig farming in the European Union: considerable variations from one Member State to another - Issue number 15/2014. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/3688.pdf [Accessed Sep 25, 2020].
Farrell MJ, 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. J Roy Stat Soc A 1203: 253-281. https://doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Friebel L, Friebelová J, 2006. Evaluation of efficiency of pig farms. Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionales 9: 35-40.
Galanopoulos K, Aggelopoulos S, Kamenidou I, Mattas K, 2006. Assessing the effects of managerial and production practices on the efficiency of commercial pig farming. Agr Syst 8: 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2005.03.002
Greene, WH, Segal D, 2004. Profitability and efficiency in the U.S. life insurance industry. J Prod Anal 213: 229-247. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000022092.70204.fa
Guillén J, Rengifo EW, Ozsoz E, 2014. Relative power and efficiency as a main determinant of banks' profitability in Latin America. Borsa Istanbul Rev 142: 119-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2014.02.003
Hedija V, Fiala R, Kuncová M, 2017. Is profitability a good proxy for efficiency? Evidence from the subsector of tour operators. Rev Econ Perspect 174: 425-440. https://doi.org/10.1515/revecp-2017-0022
Hoste R, 2020. International comparison of pig production costs 2018. Results of InterPIG.Wageningen. Wageningen Econ Res, Report 2020-007. https://doi.org/10.18174/511876
Hult GTM, Ketchen DJ, Chabowski BR, Hamman MK, Dykes BJ et al., 2008. An assessment of the measurement of performance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 396: 1064-1080. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400398
Keramidou I, Mimis A, Fotinopoulou A, Tassis CD, 2013. Exploring the relationship between efficiency and profitability. Benchmarking 205: 647-660. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2011-0090
Kostlivý V, Fuksová Z, 2019. Technical efficiency and its determinants for Czech livestock farms. Agr Econ - Czech 65: 175-184. https://doi.org/10.17221/162/2018-AGRICECON
Kumar S, 2008. An analysis of efficiency - Profitability relationship in Indian public sector banks. Global Bus Rev 91: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1177/097215090700900108
Lansink AO, Reinhard S, 2004. Investigating technical efficiency and potential technological change in Dutch pig farming. Agr Syst 79: 353-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(03)00091-X
Latruffe L, Desjeux Y, Bakucs Z, Ferto I, Fogarasi J, 2013. Environmental pressures and technical efficiency of pig farms in Hungary. Manage Decis Econ 34: 409-416. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2600
Malý M, Kroupová Z, Žídková D, Peterová J, Šobrová L, Čechura L, et al., 2011. Potential for pork production in the Czech Republic. Agr Econ - Czech 57: 545-554. https://doi.org/10.17221/58/2010-AGRICECON
Manevska-Tasevska G, Hansson H, Labajova K, 2017. Impact of management practices on persistent and residual technical efficiency - A study of Swedish pig farming. Manage Decis Econ 38: 890-905. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2823
Matulová K, Čechura L, 2016. Technological heterogeneity, technical efficiency and subsidies in Czech agriculture. J Centr Eur Agr 17: 447-466. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/17.2.1728
Ministry of the Agriculture of the Czech Republic, 2020. Situation and outlook report for pigs and pork. http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/657226/Prasata_a_veprove_maso_2020.pdf [Accessed Sep 8, 2020].
Mostafa MM, 2010. Does efficiency matter? Examining the efficiency-profitability link in the US specialty retailers and food consumer stores. Int J Prod Perform Manage 593: 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401011023582
Olson D, Zoubi TA, 2011. Efficiency and bank profitability in MENA countries. Emerg Market Rev 122: 94-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2011.02.003
Palečková I, 2015. Relationship between profitability and efficiency in the Czech banking sector. Proc 15th Int Conf on Finance and Banking, Silesian University, Karviná, Czech Republic. pp: 286-291.
Pechrová M, Medonos T, 2016. Czech pig farming sector after the entrance to the European Union. Proc 3rd Int Conf on European Integration 2016, VŠB, Ostrava, Czech Republic. pp: 746-754.
Porcelli F, 2009. Measurement of technical efficiency. A brief survey on parametric and non-parametric techniques. University of Warwick, UK.
Rose S, Spinks N, Canhoto AI, 2015. Management research: Applying the principles. Routledge, London and NY. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315819198
Rudinskaya T, Hlavsa T, Hruska M, 2019. Estimation of technical efficiency of Czech farms operating in less favoured areas. Agr Econ - Czech 65: 445-453. https://doi.org/10.17221/52/2019-AGRICECON
Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD, 1998. Economics. Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston.
Sellers-Rubio R, Nicolau-Gonzálbez JL, 2009. Assessing performance in services: the travel agency industry. Serv Indust J 295: 653-667. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060902720147
Shieh H-S, 2012. Does cost efficiency lead to better financial performance? A study on Taiwan international tourist hotels. J Hosp Financ Manage 201: 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10913211.2012.10721889
Špička J, 2014. Financial situation of Czech pig breeders in the period 2007-2013. Res Pig Breed 8: 20-25.
Tian X, Sun F, Zhou Y, 2015. Technical efficiency and its determinants in China's hog production. J Integr Agr 4 (6): 1057-1068. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60989-8
Vaus D, 2002. Analyzing social science data: 50 key problems in data analysis. SAGE Publ, London.
Yan Z, Wang C, Liu T, 2020. An analysis of the environmental efficiency of pig farms and its determinants - A field study from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27: 38084-38093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09922-7
Žáková Kroupová Z, 2016. Profitability development of Czech dairy farms. Agr Econ - Czech 62: 269-279. https://doi.org/10.17221/131/2015-AGRICECON
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
