Assessing knowledge and engagement on sustainable development goals: exploratory research in the agri-food departments of Ibero-American universities
Abstract
Aim of study: To offer an overview of current knowledge and civic engagement in the implementation of sustainable development goals (SDGs) applied to agriculture sector.
Area of study: Members of university communities from agri-food field departments at universities from three Ibero-American countries (Spain, Colombia and Brazil).
Material and methods: 631 on line surveys from different Ibero-American faculties of the area. Descriptive, quantitative and qualitative analysis was performed. The level of knowledge and engagement of SDGs related to agriculture sector as Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) and 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) were investigated.
Main results: The level of knowledge about the SDG Agenda, the priority rating for the implementation of each goal and the level of engagement varied significantly between countries. While Spain obtained the highest values in most of the variables relating to knowledge of the SDGs, followed by Brazil, Colombia showed the highest levels of engagement and willingness to apply specific actions in the agri-food sector to promote the implementation of the SDGs.
Research highlights: The knowledge and engagement must be improved if we are to achieve the SDGs, and education and research play a vital role in bridging the SDG implementation gap in agri-food field. In the area the best-known SDG strategies are those related to sustainable farming systems and the least-known are the concept of 'degrowth' as a possible efficient strategy, 'permaculture' and 'local production and consumption'. Big differences exist between countries in terms of public knowledge and engagement with SDGs.
Downloads
References
Aitsi-Selmi A, Murray V, Wannous C, Dickinson C, Johnston D, Kawasaki A, et al., 2016. Reflections on a science and technology agenda for 21st century disaster risk reduction. Int J Disaster Risk Sci 7: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-016-0081-x
Akinsemolu AA, 2018. The role of microorganisms in achieving the sustainable development goals. J Clean Prod 182: 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.081
Argibay M, Celorio G, Celorio J, 1997. Educación para el desarrollo. El espacio olvidado de la cooperación. Hegoa, Vitoria.
Beling AE, Vanhulst J, Demaria F, Rabi V, Carballo AE, Pelenc J, 2018. Discursive synergies for a 'great transformation' towards sustainability: pragmatic contributions to a necessary dialogue between human development, degrowth, and buen vivir. Ecol Econ 144: 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.025
Blahna DJ, Yonts Shepard S, 1989. Public involvement in resource planning: Toward bridging the gap between policy and implementation. Soc Nat Resour 2: 209-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941928909380686
Caiado RGG, Filho WL, Quelhas OLG, Nascimento DLM, Ávila LV, 2018. A literature-based review on potentials and constraints in the implementation of the sustainable development goals. J Clean Prod 198: 1276-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.102
Carracedo M, Domenech E, Duce C, Frutos RA, Gómez J, Marbán JM, et al., 2016. Diagnóstico de la educación para el desarrollo en el ámbito rural. Proyecto Rural Dear Agenda- EYD 2015. 2016, Observ de Coop Int para el Desarr de la Univ de Valladolid.
CIS, 2015. Actitudes hacia la cooperación internacional (I), nº 3056 Feb-Marzo 2015. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain.
CIS, 2016. Actitudes hacia la cooperación internacional (II), nº 3130 Feb. 2016. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain.
CIS, 2019. Barómetro de enero 2019. Estudio nº 3238. Enero 2019. Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas, Spain.
Darnton A, 2009. The public, DFID and support for development-A rapid review. DFID, London.
Dlouha J, Pospísilova M, 2018. Education for sustainable development goals in public debate: the importance of participatory research in reflecting and supporting the consultation process in developing a vision for Czech education. J Clean Prod 172: 4314-4327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.145
Dufour S, Barkema HW, Des Côteaux L, Devries T, Dohoo IR, Reyher K, et al., 2010. Development and validation of a bilingual questionnaire for measuring udder health related management practices on dairy farms. Prev Vet Med 95: 74-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.02.018
European Union, 2017. Sustainable development in the European Union: monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. https://bit.ly/3hJtsX0
FAO-AGROSAVIA, 2018. Innovaciones en producción cárnica con bajas emisiones de carbono. Experiencias y desafíos en ALC. http://www.fao.org/3/CA2202ES/ca2202es.pdf
Gómez-Quintero JD, Moreno JR, Jacotte C, Almaguer P, Cabezudo E, Tapiador R, et al., 2017. Informe: "Diagnóstico de la educación para el desarrollo y la ciudadanía global. Provincia de Zaragoza". Univ de Zaragoza, Spain.
Gómez-Quintero JD, Gargallo Valero P, Miguel Álvarez J, 2019. Who supports international development cooperation in times of crisis? Public opinion in rural Spain. Sustainability 11: 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072027
Gough A, 2018. Sustainable development and global citizenship education: Challenging imperatives. In: The Palgrave handbook of global citizenship and education; Davies I et al. (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp: 295-312. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59733-5_19
Grande I, Abascal E, 2014. Fundamentos y técnicas de investigación comercial, 12ª Ed. ESIC Editorial, Madrid.
Guerrero A, Gómez-Quintero JD, Olleta JL, 2020. Crisis climática y objetivos de desarrollo sostenible: un enfoque desde la perspectiva de la producción animal, el consumo de carne y los efectos sociales. Inf Tec Econ Agr 116: 405-423. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2020.025
Gupta J, Vegelin C, 2016. Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. Int Environ Agreem Polit Law Econ 16: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-016-9323-z
Jayasooria D, 2016. Sustainable development goals and social work: opportunities and challenges for social work practice in Malaysia. J Hum Rights Soc Work 1: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41134-016-0007-y
Kanter DR, Schwoob MH, Baethgen WE, Bervejillo JE, Carriquiry M, Dobermann A, et al., 2016. Translating the sustainable development goals into action: A participatory backcasting approach for developing national agricultural transformation pathways. Glob Food Sec 10: 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.08.002
Kanter DR, Musumba M, Wood SLR, Palm C, Antle J, Balvanera P, et al., 2018. Evaluating agricultural trade-offs in the age of sustainable development. Review. Agric Syst 163: 73-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.09.010
Lazzarini B, Pérez-Foguet A, Boni A, 2018. Key characteristics of academics promoting sustainable human development within engineering studies. J Clean Prod 188: 237-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.270
Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Pace P, Mifsud M, Brandli L, et al., 2018. Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 25: 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2017.1342103
Leal Filho W, Shield C, Paço A, Mifsud M, Ávila LV, Brandi LL, et al., 2019. Sustainable development goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? J Clean Prod 232: 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.309
Lopes LO, Silva R, Guimaraes JT, Coutinho NM, Pimentel TC, Duarte MC, et al., 2020. Traceability: perceptions and attitudes of Brazilian non-bovine dairy processors. Food Control 111: 107060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.107060
Madzík P, Budaj P, Chocholáková A, 2018. Practical experiences with the application of corporate social responsibility principles in a higher education environment. Sustainability 10: 1736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061736
Martínez-Alier J, Pascual U, Vivien FD, Zaccai E. 2010. Sustainable de-growth: Mapping the context, criticisms and future prospects of an emergent paradigm. Ecol Econ 69: 1741-1747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.017
Miguel González LJ, Domenech Llorente E, Carracedo Bustamante M, Gómez González J, Pérez Miguel L, Temprano García V, 2012. Educación para el desarrollo en Castilla y León: cómo vemos el mundo. Observatorio de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo, Univ de Valladolid, Spain.
Monk D, 2013. Global citizenship education in Canada: Whose role? Citiz Edu Res Network (CERN) Collect, Peer Rev Collect, 46-56.
Nhemachena C, Matchaya G, Nhemachena CR, Karauaihe S, Muchara B, Nhlengethwa S, 2018. Measuring baseline agriculture-related sustainable development goals index for Southern Africa. Sustainability 10: 849. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030849
Nicolai S, Bhatkal T, Hoy C, Aedy T, 2016. Projecting progress: the SDGs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Overseas Development Institute, London. https://www.odi.org/sites/odi.org.uk/files/resource-documents/11376.pdf
Ong A, 2007. Higher learning: educational availability and flexible citizenship in global space. In: Diversity and citizenship education: global perspectives; Banks, JA (ed). Jossey-Bass, An imprint of Wiley. Indianapolis.
Ongaro E, Valotti G, 2008. Public management reform in Italy: explaining the implementation gap. Int J Publ Sector Manag 21: 174-204. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550810855654
Östman J, 2012. Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media Soc 14: 1004-1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812438212
Pelegrino BO, Silva R, Guimaraes JT, Coutinho NF, Pimentel TC, Castro BG, et al., 2020. Traceability: Perception and attitudes of artisanal cheese producers in Brazil. J Dairy Sci 103: 4874-4879. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-17997
Pohlmann CR, Scavarda AJ, Alves MB, Korzenowski AL, 2020. The role of the focal company in sustainable development goals: A Brazilian food poultry supply chain case study. J Clean Prod 245: 118798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118798
Rojas H, Puig-i-Abril E, 2009. Mobilizers mobilized: Information, expression, mobilization and participation in the digital age. Jo Comp-Med Commun 14: 902-927. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01475.x
Sachs J, Schmidt-Traub G, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G, 2019. Sustainable development report 2019. Bertelsmann Stiftung and SDSN, NY. https://dashboards.sdgindex.org/#/
Salvia AL, Filho WL, Brandli LL, Griebeler JS, 2019. Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: local and global issues. J Clean Prod 208: 841-849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.242
Sañudo C, Guerrero A, Magalhaes D, Campo MM, 2017. Importancia y necesidades de las marcas de calidad en la carne y productos cárnicos (pasado, presente y futuro). En: Guía práctica marcas de calidad y productos cárnicos. Red CYTED 116RT503. Marcarne. http://hdl.handle.net/10198/11133
SDSN Australia/Pacific, 2017. Getting started with the SDGs in universities: A guide for universities, higher education institutions, and the academic sector. Australia, New Zealand and Pacific Edition. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. Australia/Pacific, Melbourne.
Teixeira A, Sañudo C (coord.), 2019. Marcas de calidad de carne en Iberoamerica (Caribe, Sudamérica y Península Ibérica). Red Marcarne. https://www.marcarne.org
Thamlikitkul V, 2006. Bridging the gap between knowledge and action for health: Case studies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 84: 603-607. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.05.023622
UN, 2012. The future we want. A/RES.66/288 (11 Sept). United Nations General Assembly on 27.Jul.2012. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_66_288.pdf
UNESCO, 1998. World Conference on Higher Education in the 21 Century: Vision and Action, Paris. ED/2005/ME/H/1. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000141952
UNESCO, 2009. World Conference on Higher Education - The New Dynamics of Higher Education and Research for Societal Change and Development, Paris. ED.2010/WS/26. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000189242
UNESCO, 2014. Shaping the future we want. UN Decade of education for Sustainable Development (2005-2014). Final Report. Paris. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=400&nr=1682&menu=35
UNESCO, 2017. Education for sustainable development goals: learning objectives, Paris. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002524/252423s.pdf
UNDP, 2019. Development reports. Human development index ranking. United Nations Development Program. Human. http://hdr.undp.org/
Vasilescu R, Barna C, Epure M, Baicu C, 2010. Developing university social responsibility: A model for the challenges of the new civil society. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 2: 4177-4182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.660
WCED, 1987. Our common future: a report from the United Nations World Commission on environment and development. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford Univ Press. http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf
World Bank, 2017a. Atlas of sustainable development goals 2017: From world development indicators. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/26306
World Bank, 2017b. World bank open data. https://data.worldbank.org/
Wright TS, Wilton H, 2012. Facilities management directors' conceptualizations of sustainability in higher education. J Clean Prod 31: 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.030
Yubero S, Larrañaga E, 2002. Concepción del voluntariado desde la perspectiva motivacional: conducta de ayuda vs. altruismo, pedagogía social. Rev Interuniv 9: 27-39.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
