Enhancing salinity management strategies for Amaranthus cruentus: integrating EC models and salinity tolerance thresholds
Abstract
Aim of the study: The objective of this study was to determine the salinity tolerance threshold of Amaranthus cruentus L. and evaluate its performance under various salinity conditions. Additionally, this research explored the feasibility of expressing the salinity threshold as pore water salinity (ECw), which can be estimated using a capacitance probe in combination with the mathematical model proposed by Hilhorst (2000) (ECwHi). The ultimate goal was to enhance salinity management strategies for sustainable agricultural practices.
Area of the study: Faculty of Agronomy Sciences of the University of Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Materials and Methods: The trial evaluated the development of A. cruentus irrigated with water of electrical conductivity levels of 1.75, 2.5, 5, 8, 10, and 15 dS m-1 over a complete crop cycle (5 months). The variables measured included stem water potential, stomatal conductance, plant and panicle height, biomass, and yield. ECw was measured using suction lysimeters, while ECwHi was estimated using data from a GS3 capacitance probe and a mathematical model.
Main results: No significant differences were found in stem water potential, plant and panicle height, biomass, or yield, except at 15 dS m-1. Based on these results a salinity tolerance threshold of 5.64 dSm-1 was determined for the electrical conductivity of a saturated extract (ECe). A strong correlation (R² > 0.8) between ECw and ECwHi was found, however the accuracy of this relationship decreased as the electrical conductivity increased from 3 to 14 dS m⁻¹. Thus, calibration is recommended for use with this specific model.
Research highlights: The study showed that Amaranthus spp. is a viable option for saline conditions, and underscore the importance of precise salinity management for sustainable agricultural practices.
Downloads
References
Bañon S, Álvarez S, Bañon D, Ortuño MF, Sánchez-Blanco MJ, 2021. Assessment of soil salinity indexes using electrical conductivity sensors. Sci Hortic 285: e110171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110171
Bañon D, Lorente B, Ortuño MF, Bañón S, Sánchez-Blanco MJ, Alarcón JJ, 2022. Effects of saline irrigation on the physiology and ornamental quality of Euphorbia Ascot Rainbow and its relationship with salinity indexes based on the bulk electrical conductivity. Sci Hortic 305: e111406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111406
Beyá-Marshall V, Arcos E, Seguel O, Galleguillos M, Kremer C, 2022. Optimal irrigation management for avocado (cv. ’Hass’) trees by monitoring soil water content and plant water status. Agric Water Manag 271: e107794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107794
Corwin DL, Lesch SM, 2005. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Comput Electron Agric 46: 11–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2004.10.005
Corwin DL, Yemoto K, 2020. Salinity: Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids. Soil Sci Soc Am J 84(5): 1442-1461. https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20154
De Pascale S, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G, Maggio A, 2003. Physiological responses of pepper to salinity and drought. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128(1): 48-54. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.128.1.0048
Di Rienzo J, Casanoves F, Balzarini M, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo C, 2014. Infostat – Software estadístico versión 2014. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. http://www.infostat.com.ar
Dinneny J, 2014. Traversing organizational scales in plant salt-stress responses. Curr Opin Plant Biol 23: 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2014.10.009
Dinsaa F, Nyabinda N, Byrnes DR, Ndinya C, Merchant EV, Simon JE, 2020. Performances of vegetable Amaranth entries in yield and nutrient contents in Tanzania and Kenya, and variety release. Journal of Medicinally Active Plants 9: 181–194. https://doi.org/10.7275/jmap.1802
El Youssfi L, Choukr R, Zaafrani M, Mediouni T, Hirich A, 2012. Effect of domestic treated wastewater use on three varieties of amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) under semiarid conditions. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 62: 147–152. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1058299
Garreaud R, Alvarez-Garreton C, Barichivich J, Boisier JP, Christie D, Galleguillos M, LeQuesne C, McPhee J, Zambrano-Bigiarini M, 2017. The 2010–2015 megadrought in central Chile: impacts on regional hydroclimate and vegetation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 21(12): 6307–6327. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-6307-2017
Grieve CM, Grattan SR, Maas EV, 2012. Plant salt tolerance. In: Agricultural salinity assessment and management; Wallander WW, Tanji KK (eds) pp. 405–460. ASCE Manuals Rep. Eng. Pract. 71(2), New York.
Hanson B, May D, 2011. Drip Irrigation Salinity Management for Row Crops; Publication 8447; University of California: Oakland, CA, USA, pp. 1–13.
Hernández E, García E, Ramírez J, 2014. Caracterización de suelos cultivados con amaranto y algunos aspectos agronómicos de la planta. Rev Mex Cienc Agric 5(3): 421–431. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v5i3.947
Hilhorst MA, 2000. A pore water conductivity sensor. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 1922–1925.
Incrocci L, Incrocci G, Pardossi A, Lock G, Nicholl C, Balendonck J, 2009. The calibration of wet-sensor for volumetric water content and pore water electrical conductivity in different horticultural substrates. Acta Hortic: 289–294. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.807.39
Jacobsen SE, Quispe H, Mujica A, 2001. Quinoa: An alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. In: Scientists and farmer-partners in research for the 21st century, Program Report 1999–2000. pp. 403–408. International Potato Center, Lima.
Jiménez L, González M, Bastidas M, Decker F, 2018. Evaluación del rendimiento de tres sistemas de siembra y dos variedades de amaranto (Amaranthus quitensis y Amaranthus hypochondriacus). J Selva Andina Biosph 6(2): 65–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.36610/j.jsab.2018.060200065
Jung J, McCouch S, 2013. Getting to the roots of it: genetic and hormonal control of root architecture. Front Plant Sci 4: 186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00186
Kargas G, Kerkides P, 2012. Comparison of two models in predicting pore water electrical conductivity in different porous media. Geoderma 189–190: 563–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.06.024
Kremer C, Díaz J, Seguel O, Tapia Y, 2021. Preliminary use of a fulvic acid as a strategy to improve water use in saline soils. Rev Fac Cienc Agrar, Univ Nac Cuyo 53(1): 164–175. https://doi.org/10.48162/rev.39.016
Lavini A, Pulvento C, d’Andria R, Riccardi M, Jacobsen SE, 2016. Effects of saline irrigation on yield and qualitative characterization of seed of an amaranth accession grown under Mediterranean conditions. J Agric Sci 154: 858–869. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859615000659
Liu F, Stützel H, 2002. Leaf expansion, stomatal conductance, and transpiration of vegetable amaranth (Amaranthus sp.) in response to soil drying. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 127(5): 878–883. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.127.5.878
Lopes L, Montenegro AAA, 2019. Space dependence of soil moisture and soil electrical conductivity in an alluvial region. Irriga 24(1): 1–15.
Maas E, Hoffman G, 1977. Crop salt tolerance – Current assessment. J Irrig Drain Div 103(2): 115–134.
Mlakar SG, Bavec M, Jakop M, Bavec F, 2012. The effect of drought occurring at different growth stages on productivity of grain amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus G6). J Life Sci 6: 283–286.
Munns R, 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell Environ 25(2): 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x
Netshimbupfe MH, Berner J, Gouws C, 2022. The interactive effects of drought and heat stress on photosynthetic efficiency and biochemical defense mechanisms of Amaranthus species. Plant–Environ. Interact 3(4): 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10064
Omami EN, Hammes P, 2006. Interactive effects of salinity and water stress on growth, leaf water relations, and gas exchange in amaranth (Amaranthus spp.). N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 34(1): 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2006.9514385
Omamt E, Hammes P, Robbertse P, 2006. Differences in salinity tolerance for growth and water-use efficiency in some amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genotypes. N Z J Crop Hortic Sci 34(1): 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2006.9514382
Ontiveros N, López V, Vergara MDJ, Islas AR, Cárdenas FI, Cuevas EO, Reyes C, Granda DM, Lopera S, Ramírez GI, Cabrera F, 2020. Amaranth-hydrolyzate enriched cookies reduce the systolic blood pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Funct Foods 64: e103613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.103613
Peter A, Ferrarezi R, Thomas P, Van Iersel M, 2011. In situ measurements of the electrical conductivity (EC) of substrates: the relationship between bulk EC, pore water EC and substrate water content. ASHS Annual Conference. HortSci 46(9): 25–28.
Pulvento C, Sellami MH, Lavini A, 2021. Yield and quality of Amaranthus hypochondriacus grain amaranth under drought and salinity at various phenological stages in southern Italy. J Sci Food Agric 102: 5022–5033. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11088
Ramírez M, Espitia E, Carballo A, Zapeda R, Vaquera H, Córdova L, 2011. Fertilización y densidad de plantas en variedades de Amaranto (Amaranthus hypochondriacus L.). Rev Mex Cienc Agríc 2(6): 855–866.
Quispe H, Jacobsen S, 1999. Response of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and amaranth (Amaranthus caldatus L.) to salinity. In: Crop development for cool and wet climate of Europe. pp. 326–330. The Commission of the European Communities, EUR.
Sadzawka A, Carrasco M, Grez R, Mora M, Flores H, Neaman A, 2006. Métodos de análisis recomendados para los suelos de Chile. Series Actas INIA N° 34, Santiago, Chile. 150 pp.
Scoggins HL, van Iersel MW, 2006. In situ probes for measurement of electrical conductivity of soilless substrates: effects of temperature and substrate moisture content. HortSci 41: 210–214. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.41.1.210
Shackel K, Ahmadi H, Biasi W, Buchner R, Goldhamer D, Gurusinghe S, et al., 1997. Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnology 7(1): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.7.1.23
Shukla A, Srivastava N, Suneja P, Yadav SK, Hussain Z, Rana JC, Yadav, 2018. Untapped amaranth (Amaranthus spp.) genetic diversity with potential for nutritional enhancement. Genet Resour Crop Evol 65: 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0526-0
Taiz L, Zeiger E, 2010. Plant Physiology. 5th Edition, Sinauer Associates Inc., USA. 782 pp.
Tang Y, Tsao R, 2017. Phytochemicals in quinoa and amaranth grains and their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and potential health beneficial effects: a review. Mol Nutr Food Res 61(7): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201600767
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
