Are Tunisian organic olive growing farms sustainable? An adapted IDEA approach analysis
Abstract
Sustainability and multifunctionality of agriculture have become widely shared goals for both scientific community and decision makers. Nowadays, it is important to assess not only the economic sustainability of farms, but also their environmental and socio-territorial sustainability. Numerous sustainability measurement tools have been developed by researchers and some institutions to assess these three dimensions. With the purpose to improve farms’ sustainability, this paper aims providing oriented strategies to go toward more conscientious farmers’ practices in the Tunisian organic olive sector. To reach this goal, two methodological steps were followed: (i) a sustainability measurement process to quantify farms’ sustainability by a methodological adaptation of the IDEA approach; (ii) on the basis of the obtained scores of the three sustainability scales, farms’ segmentation was carried out by the use of cluster analysis. In that sense, a questionnaire directed to a sample of organic olive growing farmers was carried out in the regions of Sfax and Mahdia, Tunisia. Results show a variability of sustainability levels within and between groups of farms. Cluster analysis results confirmed the existence of two main farms’ groups. The first group is more agro-environmentally and socio-territorially sustainable than the second one. Weaknesses in the sustainability performances have been identified and improvement strategies have been formulated and oriented to each group. Results also indicate that in some cases there is no antagonism between environmental, socio-territorial and economic sustainability, so it is possible to improve simultaneously the three dimensions of sustainability.Downloads
References
Alonso AM, Guzman GI, 2006. Evaluación comparada de la sostenibilidad agraria en el olivar ecológico y convencional. Agroecología 1: 63-73.
Bakir S, 2011. Durabilité des systèmes de production oléicole conduits en irrigué: Cas de la région de Kairouan (Tunisie). Thesis PFE in École Supérieure d'Agriculture de Mograne, Tunisie. 108 pp. [In French].
Belhaj F, 2012. Durabilité des systèmes de production oléicole conduits en irrigué: Cas du périmètre public d'Aguereb du Gouvernorat de Sfax (Tunisie). Thesis PFE in École Supérieure d'Agriculture de Mograne, Tunisie. 86 pp. [In French].
Bockstaller C, Girardin P, 2003. How to validate environmental indicators? Agr Syst 76(2): 639-653.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00053-7
Bockstaller C, Guichard LKO, Girardin P, Galan MB, Gaillard G, 2008. Comparison of methods to assess the sustainability of agriculture systems. Agron Sust Dev 29(1): 223-235.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008058
Cornelissen AMG, Vand Den Berg J, Koops WJ, Grossman, M, Udo HMJ, 2001. Assessment of the contribution of sustainability indicators to sustainable development: a novel approach using fuzzy set theory. Agr Ecosyst Environ 86(2): 173-185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00272-3
CTAB, 2008. Statistic data. Centre Technique de l'Agriculture Biologique. Sousse, Tunisie. Available in http://www.ctab.nat.tn [21 October 2012].
Del'Homme B, Pradel M, 2005. Evaluation de la durabilité des exploitations viticoles dans le vignole bordelais - Méthodes et résultats. Proc OENOMETRIE XII, 27-28 May, Macerta (Italy) [In French].
Desbois D, 2007. Impacts marchands, non marchands et structurels des réformes des politiques agricoles et agri-environnementales. La mesure de la durabilité: Une synthèse. Document de travail nº 8 du projet IMPACTS. Available in http://www2.toulouse.inra.fr/lerna/chercheurs/thomas/projets/ADD%20WP%208%20(DDesbois).pdf [21 October 2012].
Elfkih S, Feijoo ML, Romero C, 2009. Agricultural sustainable management: a normative approach based on goal programming. J Oper Res Soc 60: 534-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602588
Fortun-Lamothe L, Auvergne A, 2008. Quelle est la durabilité de la production de foie gras d'oie Atouts et limites des conditions d'élevage actuelles. Étude comparée avec la production de foie gras de canard. Proc 8èmes Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, 30-31 October, Arcachon (France) [In French].
Galan MB, Peschard D, Boizard H, 2007. ISO 14 001 at the farm level: Analysis of five methods for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices. J Environ Manage 82(3): 341-352.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.06.025
PMid:17084504
Ketchen DJ, Shook CL, 1996. The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: an analysis and critique. Strat Manage J 17: 441-458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199606)17:6<441::AID-SMJ819>3.0.CO;2-G
Laajimi A, Ben Nasr J, 2009. Appréciation et comparaison de la durabilité des exploitations agricoles biologiques et conventionnelles en Tunisie: cas de l'oléiculture dans la région de Sfax. New Medit 3(1): 10-19.
Mitchell G, May A, McDonald A, 1995. PICABUE: A methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable development. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol 2: 104-123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509509469893
Parra-López C, Calatrava-Requena J, 2005. Factors related to the adoption of organic farming in Spanish olive orchards. Span J Agric Res 3(1): 5-16.
Parra-López C, Calatrava-Requena J, de Haro-Giménez T, 2007. A multi-criteria evaluation of the environmental performances of conventional, organic and integrated olive-growing systems in the south of Spain based on experts' knowledge. Renew Agr Food Syst 22(3): 189-203.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1742170507001731
Parra-López C, Calatrava-Requena J, de Haro-Giménez T, 2008. A systemic comparative assessment of the multifunctional performance of alternative olive systems in Spain within an AHP-extended framework. Ecol Econ 64(4): 820-834.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.05.004
Peschard D, Galan MB, Boizard H, 2004. Tools for evaluating the environmental impact of agricultural practices at the farm level: analysis of 5 agri-environmental methods. Colloque: OECD Expert Meeting on Farm Management Indicators for Agriculture and The Environment, New Zealand, March 8-12.
Srour G, 2006. Amélioration durable de l'élevage des petits ruminants au Liban. PHD Thesis, Institut National Polytechnique de Lorraine, 219 pp. [In French].
Viaux P, 2003. Pour une agriculture durable. Vous avez dit Durable, mais est Vraiment Mesurable? Revue Perspectives Agricoles 295:18–24.
Vilain L, 2008. La méthode IDEA: guide d'utilisation, 3rd éd act. Educagri éditions, Dijon (France).
Zahm F, Girardin P, Mouchet C, Viaux P, Vilain L, 2005. De l'évaluation de la durabilité des exploitations agricoles à partir de la méthode IDEA à la caractérisation de la durabilité de la "ferme européenne" à partir d'IDERICA. Colloque Int Indicateur Territoriaux du Développement Durable, Université Paul Cézanne Aix-Marseille III, Aix en Provence, France. Available in http://www.idea.portea.fr/fileadmin/documents/En_savoir_plus/IDEA_IDERICA_colloque_aix. [21 October 2012].
Zahm F, Viaux P, Girardin P, Vilain L, Mouchet C, 2006. Farm sustainability assessment using the IDEA method: from the concept of farm sustainability to case studies on French farms. Proc first Symp Int Forum on Assessing Sustainability in Agriculture (INFASA), March 16, Bern, Switzerland. Available in http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2007/infasa_common_principles.pdf [21 October 2012].
Zahm F, Viaux P, Vilain L, Girardin P, Mouchet C, 2008. Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method – From the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sust Dev 16(4): 271–281.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sd.380
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.









