To what extent are farmers willing to adapt to climate change? An assessment of agricultural best management practices adoption
Abstract
Aim of study: Address farmers’ preferences for the adoption of agricultural best management practices in a climate change context and estimate their willingness to accept values for these practices.
Area of study: Region of Murcia (SE Spain).
Material and Methods: The method employed is a discrete choice experiment, whose attributes are the agricultural best management practices for climate change adaptation [regulated deficit irrigation, crop diversification, organic fertilisation, crop residues management, narrowing farmland by 5%, perimeter hedgerows, biological control, enabling eco-tourism activities] and a subsidy to incentivise their adoption. Data were collected for a sample of 250 farmers and analysed by a mixed logit model.
Main results: Narrowing farmland by 5%, biological control and the establishment of perimeter hedgerows were the practices generating the greatest values of disutility, and therefore they displayed higher willingness to accept values, ranging from 320 to 410 €/ha/year. In contrast, organic fertilisation and crop residues management were the practices with lowest levels of disutility, and so demanding lower compensatory payments to engage farmers to adopt, which rounded 110 €/ha/year, respectively. Preference heterogeneity was also assessed, revealing that the likelihood of adopting best management practices was determined by farm characteristics (farm size, crop type and farming system) and farmer factors (educational level).
Research highlights: Farmers are willing to adopt agricultural best management practices for climate change adaption if they are associated to properly designed incentives.
Downloads
References
Albaladejo-García JA, Alcon F, Martínez-Paz JM, 2020. The irrigation cooling effect as a climate regulation service of agroecosystems. Water 12(6): 1553. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061553
Albaladejo-García JA, Zabala JA, Alcon F, Dallimer M, Martínez-Paz JM, 2023. Integrating socio-spatial preference heterogeneity into the assessment of the aesthetic quality of a Mediterranean agricultural landscape. Landscape Urban Plann 239: 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104846
Albaladejo-García JA, Martínez-Paz JM, 2025. Substitution effects and spatial factors in the social demand for landscape aesthetics in agroecosystems. Landscape Urban Plann 257: 105322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2025.105322
Albaladejo-García JA, Martínez-García V, Martínez-Paz JM, Alcon F, 2025. Gaining insight into best management practices for climate change impact abatement on agroecosystem services and disservices. J Environ Manage 384: 125629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125629
Alcon F, Zabala JA, Martínez-García V, Albaladejo JA, López-Becerra EI, De-Miguel MD, Martínez-Paz JM, 2022. The social wellbeing of irrigation water. A demand-side integrated valuation in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Agric Water Manage 262: 107400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107400
Alcon F, Marín-Miñarro C, Zabala JA, de-Miguel MD, Martínez-Paz JM, 2020. Valuing diversification benefits through intercropping in Mediterranean agroecosystems: A choice experiment approach. Ecol Econ 171: 106593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106593
Alcon F, Egea G, Nortes PA, 2013. Financial feasibility of implementing regulated and sustained deficit irrigation in almond orchards. Irrig Sci 31: 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-012-0369-6
Almagro M, Re P, Díaz-Pereira E, Boix-Fayos C, Sánchez-Navarro V, Zornoza R, Martínez-Mena M, 2023. Crop diversification effects on soil organic carbon and nitrogen storage and stabilization is mediated by soil management practices in semiarid woody crops. Soil Tillage Res 233: 105815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2023.105815
Barratt BIP, Moran VC, Bigler F, Van Lenteren JC, 2018. The status of biological control and recommendations for improving uptake for the future. BioControl 63: 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9831-y
Beaudet C, Tardieu L, David M, 2022. Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation? Ecol Econ 200: 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107527
Berríos P, Temnani A, Zapata S, Forcen-Munoz M, Franco JA, Perez-Pastor A, 2023. Sensitivity to water deficit of the second stage of fruit growth in late mandarin trees. Irrig Sci 41(1): 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00796-w
Blasi E, Rossi ES, Zabala JÁ, Fosci L, Sorrentino A, 2023. Are citizens willing to pay for the ecosystem services supported by Common Agricultural Policy? A non-market valuation by choice experiment. Sci Total Environ 893: 164783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164783
Bro AS, Ortega DL, Clay DC, Richardon R, 2019. Understanding individuals’ incentives for climate change adaptation in Nicaragua’s coffee sector. Climate and Development 12(4): 332-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2019.1619506
Cerdá A, Rodrigo-Comino J, Giménez-Morera A, Keesstra SD, 2017. An economic, perception and biophysical approach to the use of oat straw as mulch in Mediterranean rainfed agriculture land. Ecol Eng 108: 162-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.08.028
Chakir R, Thomas A, 2022. Unintended consequences of environmental policies: the case of set-aside and agricultural intensification. Environ Model Assess 27(2): 363-384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-021-09815-0
Champ PA, Boyle K, Brown TC (eds.), 2017. A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation. Springer Nature, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 504 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8
CREM, 2024. Centro Regional de Estadística de Murcia. Datos regionales. https://econet.carm.es/web/crem/inicio/-/crem/sicrem/PU_datosBasicos/Indice1.html
Czajkowski M, Zagórska K, Letki N, Tryjanowski P, Wąs A, 2021. Drivers of farmers’ willingness to adopt extensive farming practices in a globally important bird area. Land Use Policy 107: 104223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104223
Dessart F, Barreiro-Hurlé J, van Bavel R, 2019. Behavioural factors affecting the adoption of sustainable farming practices: a policy-oriented review. Eur Rev Agric Econ 46: 417–471. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz019
Doran EMB, Zia A, Hurley SE, Tsai Y, Koliba C, Adair C, Schattman R, Rizzo D, Méndez VE, 2020. Social-Psychological Determinants of Farmer Intention to Adopt Nutrient Best Management Practices: Implications for Resilient Adaptation to Climate Change. J Environ Manage 276: 111304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111304
Egea G, Fernández JE, Alcon F, 2017. Financial assessment of adopting irrigation technology for plant-based regulated deficit irrigation scheduling in super high-density olive orchards. Agric Water Manage 187: 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.008
European Commission, 2022. Feeding Europe: 60 years of common agricultural policy. https://agriculture.ec.europa.eu/common-agricultural-policy/cap-overview/cap-glance_es
Gars J, Guerrero S, Kuhfuss L, Lankoski J, 2024. Do farmers prefer result-based, hybrid or practice-based agri-environmental schemes? Eur Rev Agric Econ 51(3): 644-689. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbae017
Giannoccaro G, Roselli L, Sardaro R, de Gennaro BC, 2022. Design of an incentive-based tool for effective water saving policy in agriculture. Agric Water Manage 272: 107866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107866
Haile KK, Tirivayi N, Tesfaye W, 2019. Farmers’ willingness to accept payments for ecosystem services on agricultural land: The case of climate-smart agroforestry in Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv 39: 100964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100964
Hanemann WM, 1984. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. Am J Agric Econ 66(3): 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
Heath SK, Soykan CU, Velas KL, Kelsey R, Kross SM, 2017. A bustle in the hedgerow: Woody field margins boost on-farm avian diversity and abundance in an intensive agricultural landscape. Biol Conserv 212: 153-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.031
Hensher DA, Rose JM, Greene WH, 2005. Applied Choice Analysis. A Primer. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Hernández T, Berlanga JG, Tormos I, Garcia C, 2021. Organic versus inorganic fertilizers: Response of soil properties and crop yield. AIMS Geosciences 7(3): 415-439. https://doi.org/10.3934/geosci.2021024
Hess S, Palma D, 2019. Apollo: a flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application. J Choice Model 32: 100170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2019.100170
Ingrao C, Strippoli R, Lagioia G, Huisingh D, 2023. Water scarcity in agriculture: An overview of causes, impacts and approaches for reducing the risks. Heliyon 9: e18507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18507
Kerr RB, Hasegawa T, Lasco R, Bhatt I, Deryng D, Farrell A, …, Thornton P, 2022. Chapter 5: Food, fibre, and other ecosystem products. IPCC WGII Sixth Assessment Report, IPCC, Lausanne.
Kremen C, 2020. Ecological intensification and diversification approaches to maintain biodiversity, ecosystem services and food production in a changing world. Emerg Top Life Sci 4(2): 229-240. https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20190205
Kumarasinghe U, 2021. A review on new technologies in soil erosion management. J Res Technol Eng 2: 120-127.
Lancaster KJ, 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74: 132-157. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1828835
Ling M, Xu L, 2021. How and when financial incentives crowd out pro-environmental motivation: A longitudinal quasi-experimental study. J Environ Psychol 78: 101715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101715
López-Felices B, Aznar-Sánchez JA, Velasco-Muñoz JF, Mesa-Vázquez E, 2022. Installation of hedgerows around greenhouses to encourage biological pest control: Farmers’ perspectives from Southeast Spain. J Environ Manage 323: 116210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116210
Luo L, Qin L, Wang Y, Wang Q, 2016. Environmentally-friendly agricultural practices and their acceptance by smallholder farmers in China—A case study in Xinxiang County, Henan Province. Sci Total Environ 571: 737-743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.045
Ma C, Zhang W, Peng Y, Zhao F, Chang X, Xing K, …, Rudolf VHW, 2021. Climate warming promotes pesticide resistance through expanding overwintering range of a global pest. Nat Commun 12: 5351. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25505-7
Marcos-Pérez M, Sánchez-Navarro V, Martínez-Martínez S, Martínez-Mena M, García E, Zornoza R, 2023. Intercropping organic melon and cowpea combined with return of crop residues increases yields and soil fertility. Agron Sustainable Dev 43: 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-023-00902-y
Martínez-García V, Zabala JA, Albaladejo-García JA, Lopez-Becerra EI, Sánchez-Navarro V, Sánchez-Navarro JL, …, Alcon F, 2024. Selection of incentives for a business strategy based on crop diversification. Span J Agric Res 22(3): e0104. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2024223-20967
Martínez-García V, Martínez-Paz JM, Alcon F, 2025. Sustainability assessment of agricultural practices integrating both LCA and Ecosystem Services approaches. Ecosyst Serv 72: 101698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101698
McFadden D, 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Frontiers in Econometrics, Zarembka P (ed.). pp: 105-142. Academic Press, New York.
McGurk E, Hynes S, Thorne F, 2020. Participation in agri-environmental schemes: A contingent valuation study of farmers in Ireland. J Environ Manage 262: 110243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110243
Montgomery I, Caruso T, Reid N, 2020. Hedgerows as ecosystems: service delivery, management, and restoration. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 51(1): 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-012120-100346
Nadeu E, Godfroy A, 2024. Supporting a transition to sustainable farming systems. Reflecting on the CAP implementation and the use of crisis responses. Policy Report. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels.
Pellicer-Martínez F, Martínez-Paz JM, 2018. Climate change effects on the hydrology of the headwaters of the Tagus River: Implications for the management of the Tagus-Segura transfer. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22(12): 6473–6491. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-6473-2018
Piñeiro V, Arias J, Dürr J, Elverdin P, Ibáñez AM, Kinengyere A, Opazo CM, Owoo N, Page JR, Prager SD, Torero M, 2020. A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nat Sustain 3: 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y
Puertes C, Bautista I, Lidón A, Francés F, 2021. Best management practices scenario analysis to reduce agricultural nitrogen loads and sediment yield to the semiarid Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spain). Agric Syst 188: 103029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103029
Puntsagdorj B, Orosoo D, Huo X, Xia X, 2021. Farmer’s perception, agricultural subsidies, and adoption of sustainable agricultural practices: A case from Mongolia. Sustainability 13(3): 1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031524
Raven PH, Wagner DL, 2021. Agricultural intensification and climate change are rapidly decreasing insect biodiversity. PNAS 118(2): e2002548117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002548117
Rehman A, Farooq M, Lee DJ, Siddique KH, 2022. Sustainable agricultural practices for food security and ecosystem services. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(56): 84076-84095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23635-z
Rezaei EE, Webber H, Asseng S, Boote K, Durand JL, Ewert F, ..., MacCarthy DS, 2023. Climate change impacts on crop yields. Nat Rev Earth Environ 4(12): 831-846. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00491-0
Rojas R, Morillo J, Usero J, Delgado-Moreno L, Gan J, 2013. Enhancing soil sorption capacity of an agricultural soil by addition of three different organic wastes. Sci Total Environ 458: 614-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.032
Rose JM, Bliemer MCJ, 2009. Constructing efficient stated choice experimental designs. Transp Rev 29(5): 587-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640902827623
Sakellariou M, Psiloglou BE, Giannakopoulos C, Mylona PV, 2021. Integration of abandoned lands in sustainable agriculture: The case of terraced landscape re-cultivation in Mediterranean island conditions. Land 10(5): 457. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10050457
Salazar-Ordóñez M, Rodríguez-Entrena M, Villanueva AJ, 2021. Exploring the commodification of biodiversity using olive oil producers’ willingness to accept. Land Use Policy 107: 104348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104348
Schulze C, Zagórska K, Häfner K, Markiewicz O, Czajkowski M, Matzdorf B, 2024. Using farmers’ ex ante preferences to design agri-environmental contracts: A systematic review. J Agric Econ 75(1): 44-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12570
Shahzad A, Ullah S, Dar A, Sardar MF, Mehmood T, Tufail MA, ..., Haris M, 2021. Nexus on climate change: Agriculture and possible solution to cope future climate change stresses. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28: 14211-14232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12649-8
Sutton PC, Anderson SJ, Costanza R, Kubiszewski I, 2016. The ecological economics of land degradation: Impacts on ecosystem service values. Ecol Econ 129: 182-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.06.016
Tyllianakis E, Martin-Ortega J, 2021. Agri-environmental schemes for biodiversity and environmental protection: How we are not yet “hitting the right keys”. Land Use Policy 109: 105620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105620
Tomasetto F, Tylianakis JM, Reale M, Wratten S, Goldson SL, 2017. Intensified agriculture favors evolved resistance to biological control. PNAS 114(15): 3885-3890. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618416114
Toromade AS, Soyombo DA, Kupa E, Ijomah TI, 2024. Reviewing the impact of climate change on global food security: Challenges and solutions. Int J Appl Res Soc Sci 6(7): 1403-1416. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v6i7.1300
Train K, 2009. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Villanueva AJ, Gómez-Limón JA, Arriaza M, Rodríguez-Entrena M, 2015. Assessment of greening and collective participation in the context of agri-environmental schemes: The case of Andalusian irrigated olive groves. Span J Agric Res 13(4): e0108. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015134-7376
Villanueva AJ, Granado-Díaz R, Colombo S, 2024. Comparing practice- and results-based agri-environmental schemes controlled by remote sensing: An application to olive groves in Spain. J Agric Econ 75(2): 524-545. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12573
Weituschat CS, Pascucci S, Materia VC, Caracciolo F, 2023. Can contract farming support sustainable intensification in agrifood value chains? Ecol Econ 211: 107876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107876
Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, Peigné J, 2014. Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review. Agron Sustainable Dev 34(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7
Yang B, Fu P, Lu J, Ma F, Sun X, Fang Y, 2022. Regulated deficit irrigation: an effective way to solve the shortage of agricultural water for horticulture. Stress Biology 2: 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44154-022-00050-5
Zabala JA, Martínez-Paz JM, Alcon F, 2021. A comprehensive approach for agroecosystem services and disservices valuation. Sci Total Environ 768: 144859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144859
Zabala JA, Martínez-García V, Martínez-Paz JM, López-Becerra EI, Nasso M, Díaz-Pereira E, …, Alcon F, 2023. Crop diversification practices in Europe: an economic cross-case study comparison. Sustainability Sci 18: 2691-2706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01413-1
Zapata-Sierra AJ, Zapata-Castillo L, Manzano-Agugliaro F, 2022. Water resources availability in southern Europe at the basin scale in response to climate change scenarios. Environ Sci Eur 34(1): 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00649-5
Zhang J, Van Der Heijden MG, Zhang F, Bender SF, 2020. Soil biodiversity and crop diversification are vital components of healthy soils and agricultural sustainability. Front Agric Sci Eng 7(3): 236. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FASE-2020336
Copyright (c) 2025 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
