Influence of dietary protein levels and biofloc system on the nursery performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii

Marcele T. de Araújo; Douglas L. de Souza; Katariny L. de Abreu; Renata S. Farias; Luis O. Brito; Eudes de S. Correia; Maria R. M. Coimbra

doi:10.5424/sjar/2026241-21740

Marcele T. de Araújo Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7087-3913
Douglas L. de Souza Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2987-8138
Katariny L. de Abreu Department of Animal Science, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8506-1827
Renata S. Farias Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4082-3186
Luis O. Brito Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6971-3020
Eudes de S. Correia Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9987-8854
Maria R. M. Coimbra Department of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Federal Rural University of Pernambuco. Recife, 52171‑900 Pernambuco, Brazil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-8783

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2026241-21740

Palabras clave: ahorro de agua, alta densidad de población, parámetros productivos, sistemas de cultivo, reducción de costes de producción

Resumen

Resumen: Objetivo del estudio: Se evaluó el rendimiento del langostino gigante de agua dulce Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man, 1879) durante la fase de cría en diferentes sistemas de cultivo (sistema de renovacion de agua ‑ WES y sistema de biofloc ‑ BFS) y variando los niveles de proteína bruta, utilizando condiciones de cultivo de alta densidad (2.500 postlarvas por m^-³). Área del estudio: Se llevó a cabo en Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, in Brazil. Material y métodos: El diseño experimental adoptado fue un arreglo factorial (2 x 2), donde el primer factor fue el tipo de sistema de cultivo, y el segundo fue el nivel de proteína del alimento (35% y 40%), resultando en las combinaciones WES 35, WES 40, BFS 35, y BFS 40. Resultados principales: Los resultados demostraron que la combinación BFS 35 presentaba el coste variable básico de producción más bajo y una reducción sustancial de la huella hídrica, diez veces inferior a la de las combinaciones WES. Además, el BFS 35 logró una mejora notable en los beneficios netos (2.876 USD 1000 m⁻³), lo que representó aproximadamente el doble que el WES 35 (1.441 USD 1000 m⁻³) y casi el triple que el WES 40 (1.006 USD 1000 m⁻³). Aspectos destacados de la invesitgación: Por lo tanto, concluimos que el BFS 35 en la fase de vivero de M. rosenbergii puede reducir significativamente tanto la huella hídrica como el contenido de proteína bruta en los piensos comerciales, al tiempo que mejora los beneficios económicos. Estos resultados sugieren que el sistema biofloc con un nivel de proteína del 35% es una opción viable y más sostenible para la fase de vivero de M. rosenbergii, ofreciendo una alternativa prometedora a los sistemas tradicionales.

Descargas

La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.

Citas

Aminot A, Chaussepied M, 1983. Manuel des analyses chimiques en milieu marin. Gaithersburg, USA.

AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 17th Edition. Gaithersburg, USA.

APHA, Water Environment Federation, American Water Works Association, 1995. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Part 4000-6000. American Public Health Association.

Avnimelech Y, 2009. Biofloc Technology – A Practical Guide Book. Baton Rouge, USA. 258 pp.

Ballester E, Maurente LPB, Heldt A, Dutra FM, 2018. Vitamin and mineral supplementation for Macrobrachium rosenbergii in biofloc system. Lat Am J Aquat Res 46(4): 780–787. https://doi.org/10.3856/vol46-issue4-fulltext-25

Ballester ELC, Marzarotto SA, Silva de Castro C, Frozza A, Pastore I, Abreu PC, 2017. Productive performance of juvenile freshwater prawns Macrobrachium rosenbergii in biofloc system. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.13296

Boyd CE, Tucker CS, 1998. Pond aquaculture water quality management. Springer, New York. 700 pp.

Boyd CE, 1990. Water Quality in Ponds for Aquaculture. Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station, Auburn University, Alabama. 482 pp.

Braga IFM, Araujo MT, Brito LO, Correia ES, 2023. Influence of BFT and water exchange systems on growth, ammonia tolerance, and water footprint in Macrobrachium rosenbergii nursery in intensive systems. Aquac Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-023-01046-2

Ebeling JM, Timmons MB, Bisogni JJ, 2006. Engineering analysis of the stoichiometry of photoautotrophic, autotrophic, and heterotrophic removal of ammonia-nitrogen in aquaculture systems. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.03.019

El-Sayed AFM, 2021. Use of biofloc technology in shrimp aquaculture: a comprehensive review, with emphasis on the last decade. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12494

Felix S, Samocha T, Menaga M, 2020. Vannamei Shrimp Farming. CRC Press, London, UK. 220 pp. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003083276

Fróes C, Fóes G, Krummenauer D, Poersch LH, Wasielesky Jr W, 2013. Densidade de estocagem na engorda de camarão branco cultivado em sistema de biofloco. Pesq Agropec Bras. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013000800010

Frozza A, Fiorini A, Vendruscolo ECG, Rosado FR, Konrad D, Rodrigues MCG, Ballester ELC, 2021. Probiotics in the rearing of freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man, 1879) in a biofloc system. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15265

Gupta A, Sehgal HS, Sehgal GK, 2007. Growth and carcass composition of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man), fed different isonitrogenous and isocaloric diets. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01787.x

Hosain ME, Amin SMN, Arshad A, Kamarudin MS, Karim M, 2021. Effects of carbon sources on the culture of giant river prawn in biofloc system during nursery phase. Aquac Rep. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100607

Islam M, Islam SS, Bir J, Debnath P, Ullah MR, Huq K, 2023. Effect on water quality, growth performance and economics of giant freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii with partial feed in biofloc system. Aquac Fish Fish. https://doi.org/10.1002/aff2.126

Jiang Q, Bhattarai N, Pahlow M, Xu Z, 2022. Environmental sustainability and footprints of global aquaculture. Resour Conserv Recycl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106183

Karplus I, Barki A, 2019. Male morphotypes and alternative mating tactics in freshwater prawns of the genus Macrobrachium: a review. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12273

Laine C, Ollikainen M, Kankainen M, Setälä J, Vielma J, 2024. Social net benefits from aquaculture production: A comparison of net cage cultivation and recirculating aquaculture systems. Aquac Econ Manage 28: 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13657305.2023.2222681

Lima ECR, Souza RL, Girao PJM, Braga ÍFM, Correia ES, 2018. Culture of Nile tilapia in a biofloc system with different sources of carbon. Cienc Agron. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20180052

Lima PCM, Abreu JL, Silva AEM, Severi W, Galvez AO, Brito LO, 2019. Nile tilapia fingerling cultivated in a low-salinity biofloc system at different stocking densities. Span J Agric Res. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2018164-13222

Lobão VL, 1996. Camarão-da-malásia: cultivo. Brasília, Brasil. 102p.

Ly TH, Vu LH, Khánh LV, Anh NTN, 2024. Nursery rearing freshwater prawn, Macrobrachium rosenbergii, in biofloc system integrated with red seaweed, Gracilaria tenuistipitata, at different stocking densities under zero water exchange. VJSTE 66(1): 77–83. https://doi.org/10.31276/vjste.66(1).77-83

Marques HLA, Moraes-Valenti PMC, 2012. Current status and prospects of farming the giant river prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii (De Man 1879) and the Amazon River prawn Macrobrachium amazonicum (Heller 1862) in Brazil. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2011.03032

Mohanty RK, 2010. Impact of phased harvesting population structure, feed intake pattern, and growth performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii De Man (giant freshwater prawn) in polyculture with carps in concurrent rice-fish culture. Aquac Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-009-9263-5

Mohanty RK, Mishra A, Patil DU, 2014. Water budgeting in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon culture using different water and feed management systems. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v14_2_20

Naranjo JMA, Córdova LRM, Jiménez SM, Voltolina D, 2012. Intensive culture of Litopenaeus vannamei without water exchange and with an artificial substrate. Hidrobiológica 22(1):1-7.

New MB, Wagner CV, Tidwell JH, D’Abramo LR, Kutty MN, 2010. Freshwater Prawns: Biology and Farming. Wiley-Blackwell, USA. 560 pp.

Pérez-Fuentes J, Pérez-Rostro CI, Hernández-Vergara M, 2013. Pond-reared Malaysian prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii with the biofloc system. Aquaculture 400–401: 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.02.028

Piedrahita RH, 2003. Reducing the potential environmental impact of tank aquaculture effluents through intensification and recirculation. Aquaculture. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(03)00465-4

Quagrainie K, 2015. Profitability of indoor production of Pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei): A case study of the Indiana industry. EC-797_W IISG-15–005; Purdue Extension Service, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Santos RB, Coelho-Filho PA, Assunção CS, Santos TN, Silva JH, Silva GC, Brito LO, 2022a. The effect of different synbiotic preparation strategies on water fertilization and zootechnical performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii reared in the nursery stage. Aquac Int. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-022-00955-y

Santos RB, Coelho-Filho PA, Gonçalves AP, Santos RA, Rodrigues ML, Correia ES, Oliveira VQ, Brito LO, 2022b. Effects of organic carbon sources on water quality, microbial flocs protein and performance of Macrobrachium rosenbergii post-larvae reared in biofloc and synbiotic systems. Aquac Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.15580

Silva PF, Arruda MF, 2015. Social status and individual behavioral differences in juvenile Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Mar Freshw Behav Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2014.968424

StatSoft, Inc., 2014. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 12.5. https://www.statistica.com/en/software/tibco-data-science-/-tibco-statistica.

Strickland JDH, Parsons TR, 1972. A Practical Handbook of Seawater Analysis. 2nd ed. Fisheries Research Board of Canada. https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-1791

Valenti WC, Flickinger DL, 2020. Freshwater Carideanculture. In: Fisheries and Aquaculture; Lovrich G, Thiel M(eds.). pp: 207-237. Oxford University Press, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190865627.003.0009

Vanselow AP, 1940. Preparation of Nessler’s reagent. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed 12. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50149a007

Zapata KPL, Brito LO, Lima PCM, Vinatea Arana LA, Galvez AO, Cárdenas JMV, 2017. Cultivo de alevines de tilapia en sistema biofloc bajo diferentes relaciones carbono/nitrógeno. Bol Inst Pesca. https://doi.org/10.20950/1678-2305.2017v43n3p

Los efectos de los niveles de proteína en la dieta y la tecnología biofloc en la fase de cría del langostino gigante de agua dulce Macrobrachium rosenbergii

Resumen

Descargas

Citas

Indexación y calidad

Plagiarism Detection Tool