Residue management practices and planter attachments for corn production in a conservation agriculture system
Resumen
Seed placement and failure to establish a uniform plant stand are critical problems associated with production of corn (Zea mays) following wheat (Triticum aestivum) in a conservation agriculture system in Iran. Our objectives were to evaluate the performance of a corn row- crop planter equipped with two planter attachments (smooth/toothed coulters) at six wheat residue management systems (three tillage systems and two levels of surface residue) at two forward speeds of 5 and 7 km h-1. Residue retained after planting, seeding depth, emergence rate index (ERI) and seed spacing indices were determined. The baled residue plots tilled by chisel plow followed by disc harrow (BRCD) resulted in minimum residue after planting as compared to other residue treatments. Furthermore, the maximum values of the ERI and uniformity of plant spacing pertained to this treatment. Other results showed that the ERI increased up to 18% for the toothed coulter as compared to the smooth coulter. The toothed coulter also established a deeper seed placement as compared to the smooth coulter. Planting at forward speed of 5 km h-1 resulted in deeper seeding depth as compared to a forward speed of 7 km h-1. However, lower values of miss and precision indices were obtained at forward speed of 7 km h-1, indicating a more uniformity of plant spacing. Results of this study showed that equipping the conventional planter with toothed coulter and planting in soil prepared under the BRCD residue management system can result in a satisfactory conservation crop production system.Descargas
Citas
Bianchini A, Magalhaes PSG, 2007. Evaluation of coulters for cutting sugar can residue in a soil bin. Biosyst Eng 100: 370-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.04.012
Erbach DC, 1982. Tillage for continuous corn and corn-soybean rotation. T ASAE 25: 906-911. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.33638
Fallahi S, Raoufat MH, 2008. Row- cleaner planter attachments in a conservation tillage system: A comparative study. Soil Till Res 98: 27-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.10.005
Han SH, Simmons FW, 2001. Agronomy Handbook. Univ. of Illinois, IL, USA. Vol 12, pp: 117–128.
ISO, 1984. Sowing equipment-Test methods. Part 1. Single seed drills (precision drills) [7256/1]. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Kachman SD, Smith JA, 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planter using single seed metering. T ASAE 38: 379-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.27843
Kushwaha RL, Vaishnav AS, Zoerb GC, 1986. Soil bin evaluation of disc coulters under no-till crop residue conditions. T ASAE 29: 40-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.30098
Magalhaes PSG, Bianchini A, Braunbeck OA, 2007. Simulated and experimental analyses of a toothed rolling coulter for cutting crop residues. Biosyst Eng 96(2): 193-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.10.014
McCarthy JR, Pfost DL, Currence HD, 1993. Conservation tillage and residue management to reduce soil erosion. Agric Publ G-1650, Univ. of Missouri, MO, USA.
McKyes E. 1985. Soil cutting and tillage. Elsevier, NY.
Morris NL, Miller PCH, Orson JH, Froud-Williams RJ, 2010. The adoption of non-investigation tillage systems in the United Kingdom and the agronomic impact on soil, crops and the environment-A review. Soil Till Res 108: 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.03.004
Raoufat MH, Mahmoodieh RA, 2005. Stand establishment response of maize to seedbed residue, seed drill coulters and primary tillage systems. Biosyst Eng 90: 261-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.11.012
Raoufat MH, Matbooei A, 2007. Row cleaners enhance reduced tillage planting of corn in Iran. Soil Till Res 93: 152-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.026
Ritchie W, Hanway JJ, Benson GO, 1993. How a corn plant develops. CES Special Report 48, Iowa St Univ, p. 21. PMid:9968407
Staggenborg SA, Taylor RK, Maddux LD, 2004. Effect of planter speed and seed firmer on corn stand establishment. T ASAE 20(5): 573-580.
Swan JB, Higge RL, Bailey TB, Wollenhaupt NC, Paulson WH, Peterson AE, 1994. Surface residue and in-row treatment effects on long-term no-tillage and continuous corn. Agron J 86: 711–718. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600040024x
USDA, 2012. Crop production report, 2012. Available in http://www.usda.gov/fundinglapse.htm. [15 September 2012].
Wicks GA, Cruchfield A, Burnside O, 1994. Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch on metolachlor corn (Zea mays) growth and yield. Weed Sci 1: 141-147.
© CSIC. Los originales publicados en las ediciones impresa y electrónica de esta Revista son propiedad del Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, siendo necesario citar la procedencia en cualquier reproducción parcial o total.
Salvo indicación contraria, todos los contenidos de la edición electrónica se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución “Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional ” (CC BY 4.0). Consulte la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia. Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario.
No se autoriza el depósito en repositorios, páginas web personales o similares de cualquier otra versión distinta a la publicada por el editor.
