Hybridizing consumer behavioural approaches on agrifood markets: Attitudes, judgements and choices
Abstract
The attitudinal approach, represented by the Theory of Reasoned Action and, subsequent, Theory of Planned Behaviour, and the judgements and choices – also called decision – approach, rendered by the Classical Utility Economic Theory, are the two mainstream frameworks to explain consumer behaviour. The former explains consumer behaviour based on beliefs and behavioural intentions, and the latter on products’ attributes and prices. Both are criticized by having drawbacks, which may limit their explicative and predictive power, such as the attitude-behaviour or intention-behaviour gap in the former, and both the divergence between monetary assessment and predicted utility as well as the failures to maximize the utility of the choices in the latter. Our aim was to assess the potentiality of a hybrid approach which integrates instruments from both theories in order to unravel consumer behaviour in agri-food markets. The empirical research was performed using a daily agri-food product under volitional control, olive oil, and variance-based structural equation modelling by means of the Partial Least Squares (PLS) technique, collecting data from consumers in Southern Spain. The results show there are key factors from both approaches such as attitude, expected outcomes, and socioeconomic features, which makes us conclude that it is necessary to move forward on the convergence and integration of different theories. Indeed, testable knowledge must be produced which has meaningful implications for predicting behaviours in consumption.
Downloads
References
Ajzen I, 1985. From intentions to actions: A theory of planed behaviour. In: Action control: From cognition to behaviour; Khuls J, Beckmann J (eds.). pp. 11-39. Spriger-Verlang, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen I, 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav and Hum Decis Process 50 (2): 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen I, 2002. Constructing a TpB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Working paper. Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA.
Ajzen I, 2005. Attitudes, personality and behaviour (2nd ed). Open Univ. Press, Berkshire, UK. 191 pp.
Ajzen I, 2015. Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Rivista di Economia Agraria LXX (2): 121-138.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M, 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA. 278 pp.
Ajzen I, Driver BL, 1992. Contingent value measurement: On the nature and meaning of willingness to pay. J Consum Psychol 1 (4): 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80057-5
Ajzen I, Fishbein M, 2008. Scaling and testing multiplicative combinations in the expectancy-value model of attitudes. J Appl Soc Psychol 38 (9): 2222-2247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00389.x
Amir O, Ariely D, Carmon Z, 2008. The dissociation between monetary assessment and predicted utility. Mark Sci 27 (6): 1055-1064. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1080.0364
Armitage CJ, Conner M, 2001. Efficacy of the Theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 40: 471-499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939
Bagozzi RP, 1993. On the neglect of volition in consumer research: A critique and proposal. Psychol Mark 10 (3): 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220100305
Bagozzi RP, 2000. The poverty of economic explanations of consumption and an action theory alternative. Manag Decis Econ 21: 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.975
Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL, 2002. Undestanding heterogeneus preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environ Res Econ 23: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619
Chang MK, 1988. Predicting unethical behavior: A comparison of the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior. J Bus Ethics 17 (16): 1825-1834.
Chin WW, 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quart 22 (March): vii-xvi.
Chryssohoidis GM, Krystallis A, 2005. Organic consumers personal values research : Testing and validating the list of values (LOV) Scale and implementing a value - based segmentation task. Food Qual Prefer 16: 585-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.01.003
Cohen J, 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, USA. 567 pp.
Davies J, Foxall GR, Pallister J, 2002. Behaviour mythology: An integrated model of recycling−beyond the intention. Mark Theory 2 (1): 29-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593102002001645
Dekhili S, d'Hauteville F, 2009. Effect of the region of origin on the perceived quality of olive oil: an experimental approach using a control group. Food Qual Prefer 20 (7): 525-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.008
Dekhili S, Sirieix L, Cohen E, 2011. How consumers choose olive oil: The importance of origin cues. Food Qual Prefer 22 (8): 757-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.06.005
Del Giudice T, Cavallo C, Caracciolo F, Cicia G, 2015. What attributes of extra virgin olive oil are really important for consumers: A meta-analysis of consumers' stated preferences. Agr Food Econ 3 (1): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40100-015-0034-5
Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA, 2006. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag 17 (4): 263-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x
Dijkstra TK, Henseler J, 2015. Consistent and asymptotically normal PLS estimators for linear structural equations. Comput Stat Data Anal 81: 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2014.07.008
Falk RF, Miller NB, 1992. A primer for soft modeling. Univ Akron Press, OH, USA.
Fischer GW, Carmon Z, Ariely D, Zauberman G, 1999. Goal-based construction of preferences: task goals and the prominence effect. Manag Sci 45 (8): 1057-1075. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1057
Fishbein M, Ajzen I, 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA. 578 pp.
Fishbein M, Ajzen I, 2010. Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, 2002. Purchasing motives and profile of the Greek organic consumer: a countryside survey. Br Food J 104 (9): 730-765. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700210443110
Foxall GR, 1993. A behaviourist perspective on purchase and consumption. Eur J Mark 27 (8): 7-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569310042891
Glasman LR, Albarracín D, 2006. Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: A meta-analysis of the attitude-behavior relation. Psychol Bull 132 (5): 778-822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778
Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P, 2006. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 38: 69-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1
Henseler J, 2017. Bridging desing and behavioral research with variance-based structural equation modeling. J Advert 46 (1): 178-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281780
Homburg C, Totzek D, Krämer M, 2014. How price complexity takes its toll: The neglected role of a simplicity bias and fairness in price evaluations. J Bus Res 67: 1114-1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.05.049
Hsiao C, Sun B, Morwitz VG, 2002. The role of stated intentions in new product purchase forecasting. In: Advances in econometrics, Vol 16; Fomby TB et al. (ed). pp: 11-28. Emerald Group Publ Ltd, West Yorkshire, UK. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(02)16002-6
INE, 2011. Cifras oficiales del censo de población. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.
Jacoby J, Olson JC, 1977. Consumer response to price: An attitudinal, information processing perspective. In: Moving a head with attitude research; Wind Y, Greenberg M (ed). pp: 73-86. Am Market Assoc, Chicago.
Kahneman D, Twersky A, 1979. Prospect Theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47 (2): 263-292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kahneman D, Thaler R, 2006. Anomalies: Utility maximization and experienced utility. J Econ Pers 20 (1): 221-234. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533006776526076
Kim MS, Hunter JE, 1993. Realtionships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior a meta-analysis of past research. Commun Res 20 (June): 331-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365093020003001
Kim R, 2009. Factors influencing chinese consumer behavior when buying innovative food products. Agric Econ (Zeme de Lská Ekonomika) 55: 436-445. https://doi.org/10.17221/2404-AGRICECON
Kraus SJ, 1995. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Pers Soc Psychol Bull: 58-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295211007
Kreps D, 1990. A course of microeconomic theory. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ, USA. 864 pp.
Lancaster KJ, 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74 (2): 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131
Lancaster KJ, 1971. Consumer demand: A new approach. Columbia Univ Press, NY. 177 pp.
Lohmöller JB, 1989. Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. Physica-Verlag HD, Heidelberg. 286 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4
Lusk JL, Jamal M, Kurlander L, Roucan M, Taulman L, 2005. A meta-analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J Agr Resour Econ 30 (1): 28-44.
MAGRAMA, 2017. Base de datos de consumo en hogares. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de España, Spain.
McEachan RRC, Conner M, Taylor N, Lawton RJ, 2011. Prospective prediction of health-related behaviors with the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 5: 97-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2010.521684
Michael RT, Becker GS, 1973. On the new theory of consumer behavior. Scand J Econ 75 (4): 378-396. https://doi.org/10.2307/3439147
Michaelidou N, Hassan LM, 2010. Modeling the factors affecting rural consumers' purchase of organic and free-range produce: A case study of consumers' from the Island of Arran in Scotland, UK. Food Policy 35 (2): 130-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.10.001
Myrland Ø, Trondsen T, Johnston RS, Lund E, 2000. Determinants of seafood consumption in Norway: Lifestyle, revealed preferences, and barriers to consumption. Food Qual Prefer 11 (3): 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00034-8
Monroe K, 1973. Buyers' subjective perceptions of price. J Mark Res 10 (1): 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224377301000110
Nicholson W, Snyder C, 2008. Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions, 10th ed. Thomson South-Western, Mason, OH, USA. 763 pp.
Olsen SO, 2003. Understanding the relationship between age and seafood consumption: The mediating role of attitude, health, involvement and convenience. Food Qual Prefer 14: 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00055-1
Park HS, 2000. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Commun Stud 51 (2): 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970009388516
Povey R, Conner M, Sparks P, James R, Shepherd R, 2000. The theory of planned behaviour and healthy eating: Examining additive and moderating effects of social influence variables. Psychol Health 14 (6): 991-1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440008407363
Rodríguez-Entrena M, Salazar-Ordóñez M, Sayadi S, 2013. Applying partial least squares to model genetically modified food purchase intentions in Southern Spain consumers. Food Policy 40: 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2013.02.001
Rodríguez-Entrena M, Schuberth F, Gelhard C, 2018. Assessing statistical differences between parameters estimates in partial least squares path modeling. Qual Quant 52 (1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0400-8
Salazar-Ordóñez M, Rodríguez-Entrena M, Cabrera ER, Henseler J, 2018. Survey data on consumer behaviour in olive oil markets: The role of product knowledge and brand credence. Data in Brief 18 (June): 1750-1757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.084
Samuelson PA, 1948. Consumption theory in terms of revealed preference. Economica 15 (60): 243-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2549561
Samuelson PA, 1965. Foundations of economic analysis. Atheneum, NY.
Sheeran P, 2002. Intention-behavior relations: A conceptual and empirical review. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 12 (1): 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000003
Shepherd R, 2001. Does taste determine consumption? Understanding the psychology of food choice. Food People Soc: 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04601-2_8
Shepherd R, 2011. Determinants of food choice and dietary change: Implications for nutrition education. In: Nutrition education: Linking research, theory and practice, 2nd Ed; Contento IR (ed). pp: 26-42. Jones Bartlett Publ, Sudbury, MA, USA
Sheppard BH, Jon H, Warshaw PR, 1988. The theory of reasoned action: A meta-analysis of past research with recommendations for modifications and future research. J Consum Res 15 (March): 325-343. https://doi.org/10.1086/209170
Spiller SA, Belogolova L, 2017. On consumer beliefs about quality and taste. J Consum Res 43: 970-991. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw065
Stafleu A, 1994. Family resemblance in fat intake, nutrition attitudes and beliefs: a study among three generations of women. Grafisch Service Centrum, Wageningen. 189 pp.
Steenkamp JBEM, 1997. Dynamics in consumer behavior with respect to agricultural and food. In: Agricultural marketing and consumer behaviour in a changing world; Wierenga B et al. (eds). pp: 143-188. Springer, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_8
Tarkiainen A, Sundqvist S, 2005. Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food. Br Food J 107: 808-822. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700510629760
Thaler R, 1980. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J Econ Behav Organ l: 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7
Thaler R, 1985. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Market Sci 4 (3): 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
Thompson KE, Haziris N, Alekos PJ, 1994. Attitudes and food choice behaviour. Br Food J 96 (11): 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070709410074632
Towler G, Shepherd R, 1991. Modification of Fishbein and Ajzen's Theory of reasoned action to predict chip consumption. Food Qual Prefer 3 (1): 37-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3293(91)90021-6
Trafimow D, Finlay KA, 1996. The importance of subjective norms for a minority of people: Between subjects and within-subjects analyses. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 22 (8): 820-828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228005
van der Lans IA, van Ittersum K, De Cicco A, Loseby M, 2001. The role of the region of origin and EU certificates of origin in consumer evaluation of food products. Eur Rev Agr Econ 28 (4): 4451-4477. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.451
van Osselaer SMJ, Janiszewski C, 2012. Goal-based model of product evaluation and choice. J Consum Res 39 (2): 260-292. https://doi.org/10.1086/662643
Ward RW, Briz J, de Felipe I, 2003. Competing supplies of olive oil in the German market: An application of multinomial logit models. Agribusiness 19 (3): 393-406. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.10068
Webb TL, Sheeran P, 2006. Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychol Bull 132 (2): 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
Wood W, Quinn JM, 2005. Habits and the structure of motivation in everyday life. In: Social motivation: Conscious and unconscious processes; Forgas JP, Williams KD, Hippel W (eds). pp: 55-70. Cambridge Univ Press, NY. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735066.006
Woodside AG, Bearden WO, 1977. Longitudinal analysis of consumer attitude, intention, and behaviour toward beer brand choice. In: NA - Advances in Consumer Research, Vol 04; Perreault WD (ed). pp: 349-356. Assoc for Consum Res, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Young MR, Desarbo WS, Morwitz VG, 1998. The stochastic modeling of purchase intentions and behavior. Manag Sci 44 (2): 188-202. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.2.188
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
