The influence of family ownership in the profitability of vertically integrated companies. Evidence from the Spanish agri-food industry
Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyse whether the family control exerts a significant influence on profitability in agri-food companies that have been vertically integrated. This assumption is based on the idea that family-owned firms better overcome the internal conflict that arises in a company by reducing transaction costs. We have analysed the determinants of the profitability and its annual increase, considering the kind of company and its sector. Our results show that family firms tend to perform better, both from an economic and a financial perspective, than their counterparts, obtaining higher levels of efficiency with lower levels of debt. These factors lead to a higher profitability of family firms mainly attributable to the reductions of costs and financial expenses. Even though efficiency and size tend to grow if the family business is also vertically integrated, its levels of financial risk and commercial credit also increase and its sales margin decreases, which cause a trend to decrease in its profitability. These trends are independent of the year and the subsector.Downloads
References
Anderson RC, Reeb DM, 2003. Founding-family ownership, corporate diversification and firm leverage. J Law Econ 46 (2): 653-684. https://doi.org/10.1086/377115
Ang J, Cole R, Lin J, 2000. Agency cost and ownership structure. J Financ 55 (1): 81-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00201
Bhuyan S, 2005. An empirical evaluation of factors determining vertical integration in US food manufacturing industries. Agribusiness 21 (3): 429-445. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.20056
Cadot J, 2015. Agency costs of vertical integration. The case of family firms, investor-owned firms and cooperatives in the French wine industry. Agr Econ 46 (2): 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12150
Demsetz H, Lehn K, 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. J Polit Econ 93: 1155-1177. https://doi.org/10.1086/261354
Erbetta F, Menozzi A, Corbetta G, Fraquelli G, 2013. Assessing family firm performance using frontier analysis techniques: Evidence from Italian manufacturing industries. J Fam Bus Strateg 4 (2): 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2013.04.001
EUMOFA, 2019. Factors affecting cross-border investment in EU aquaculture. EUMOFA, European Union. http//www.eufoma.eu/legal.
Family Business Institute, 2015. The Family Business in Spain (2015). Instituto de la Empresa Familiar, Madrid. http://cef-ugr.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/The-Family-Business-in-Spain-2015.pdf [12th Jun 2018].
Galve-Górriz C, Salas-Fumás V, 2011. Family ownership and firm performance: the net effect of productive efficiency and growth constraints. Innovar 21 (40): 155-170. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/innovar/article/view/35130
Gallizo JL, Mar-Molinero C, Moreno J, Salvador M, 2017. Family business and value-added distribution: a socioemotional wealth approach. Acad-Rev Lat Ad 30 (1): 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARLA-05-2015-0099
Gómez-Mejia L, Cruz C, Berrone J, 2011. The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Acad Manag Ann 5 (1): 653-707. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.593320
Grau AJ, Reig A, 2015. Vertical integration and profitability of the agrifood industry in an economic crisis context. Span J Agric Res 13 (4): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015134-7487
Herrero I, 2011. Agency cost, family ties and firm efficiency. J Manag 37 (3): 887-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394866
Himmelberg C, Hubbard RG, Palia D, 1999. Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. J Financ Econ 53: 353-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00025-2
Kalm M, Gómez-Mejia L, 2016. Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Rev Adm./São Paulo 51: 409-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.08.002
Kang DL, 1998. Ownership structure and the boundaries of the firm: How large-block family owners lead to increased vertical integration, diversification and superior firm performance. Acad Manage Ann Meeting Bus Policy Strat Div, WP nº 117086, Harvard Business School, Boston, USA.
Lappo A, Bjorndal T, Fernandez-Polanco J, Lem A, 2015. Consumers' concerns and external drivers in food markets. FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4939e.pdf [12th Jun 2018].
Martikainen M, Nikkinen J, Vähämaa S, 2009. Production functions and productivity of family firms; Evidence from S&P 500. Q Rev Econ Financ 49 (2): 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2007.11.001
Materia V, Pascucci S, Dries L, 2017. Are in house and outsourcing innovation strategies correlated? Evidence from the European agrifood sector. J Agr Econ 68 (1): 249-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12206
Maudos J, Salamanca J, 2018. Observatorio sobre el sector agroalimentario español en el contexto europeo. Informe 2017, IVIE. Informes, documentos técnicos, 57.
Memili E, Chrisman JJ, Chua J, Kellermanns FW, Chang EPC, 2011. The determinants of family firm subcontracting: A transaction cost perspective. J Fam Bus Strateg 2 (1): 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2011.01.003
Müller D, Schmitz P, 2016. Transaction costs and the property rights approach to the theory of the firm. Eur Econ Rev 87: 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2016.04.013
Schwarz G, 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6 (2): 461-464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136
Short JC, Ketchen DJ, Du Toit M, 2006. An examination of firm, industry, and time effects on performance using random coefficients modeling. Org Res Meth 9 (3): 259-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106287572
Soler I, Gemar G, Guerrero-Murillo 2017. Family and non-family business behaviour in the wine sector: A comparative study. Eur J Fam Bus 7 (1): 1-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejfb.2017.11.001
Souto J, 2014. La innovación en el sector pesquero. Cuad Estud Empres 24: 107-129. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_CESE.2014.v24.48613
Spanos Y, Zaralis G, Lioukas S, 2004. Strategy effects on profitability: evidence from Greece. Strateg Manage J 25 (2): 139-165. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.369
Uclés D, Teruel M, 2012. Competitividad y tamaño en la industria de alimentación y bebidas. Fundación Cajamar/FIAB, Almeria. https://www.publicacionescajamar.es/pdf/series-tematicas/informes-coyuntura-monografias/competitividad-y-tamano-en-la-industria-2.pdf
Villafuertes A, Torres P, 2015. El sector hortofructicola español: retos, tendencias y oportunidades. Proexport. Murcia, Spain.
Zhao H, Luo Y, Suh T, 2004. Transaction cost determinants and ownership-based entry mode choice: A meta-analytical review. J Int Bus Stud 35 (6): 524-544. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400106
Zouaghi F, Sánchez-García M, Hirsch S, 2017. What drives firm profitability? A multilevel approach to the Spanish agri-food sector. Span J Agric Res 15 (3): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017153-10713
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
