Improving the monitoring of corn phenology in large agricultural areas using remote sensing data series
Abstract
Aim of study: Mexico's large irrigation areas demand non-structural actions to improve the irrigation service, such as monitoring crop phenology; however, its application has been limited by the large volumes of field information generated, diversity of crop management and climatic variability. The objective of this study was to generate and validate a methodology to monitor corn (Zea mays L.) phenology from the historical relationship of the vegetation indexes (VIs), EVI and NDVI, with the phenological development (PD) of corn grown in large irrigation zones.
Area of study: Irrigation District (ID) 075 “Valle del Fuerte”, northern Sinaloa, Mexico.
Material and methods: We used a database of 20 years of climate, field crop growth and crop phenology data, and Landsat satellite images. A methodology was proposed on a large scale supported with GIS and remote sensing data series.
Main results: The methodology was validated in 19 plots with an acceptable correlation between observed PD and estimated PD for the two VIs, with slightly better values for EVI than for NDVI. NDVI and EVI models agreed with experimental PD observations in 92.1% of the farms used to validate the methodology, in 2.5% only the NDVI model coincided with the real, in 3.1% only the EVI model coincided, and in 2.3% both models disagreed with observation, generated a stage out of phase with respect to the real phenological stage.
Research highlights: is possible to generalize the methodology applied to large irrigation zones with remote sensing data and GIS.
Downloads
References
Burke M, Lobell DB, 2017. Satellite-based assessment of yield variation and its determinants in smallholder African systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114 (9): 2189-2194. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616919114
Castillo CM, Ibáñez CLA, 2017. Análisis de sequías meteorológicas en la cuenca del río Fuerte, México. Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua VIII (1): 35-52. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2017-01-03
CONAGUA, 2019a. Estadísticas agrícolas de los distritos de riego. https://www.gob.mx/conagua/documentos/estadisticas-agricolas-de-los-distritos-de-riego
CONAGUA 2019b. Estadísticas agrícolas de unidades de riego. https://www.gob.mx/conagua/documentos/estadisticas-agricolas-de-unidades-de-riego
Chander G, Markham BL, Helder DL, 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sens Environ 113: 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007
De Bernardis C, Vicente G-Guijalba F, Martinez-Marin T, López-Sanchez JM, 2016. Particle filter approach for real-time estimation of crop phenological states using time series of NDVI images. Remote Sens 8: 610. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8070610
Espinosa EJL, Palacios VE, Tijerina ChL, Flores MH, Quevedo NA, 2017. Sistema de monitoreo satelital para el seguimiento y desarrollo de cultivos del Distrito de Riego 038. Tecnología y Ciencias del Agua VIII (1): 95-104. https://doi.org/10.24850/j-tyca-2017-01-07
Flores-Gallardo H, Ojeda-Bustamante W, Flores-Magdaleno H, Mejía-Sáenz E, Sifuentes-Ibarra E, 2012. Grados día y la programación integral del riego en el cultivo de papa. Terra Latinoamericana 30 (1): 59-67.
Ghamghami M, Nozar G, Irannejad P, Ghorbani K, 2019. Comparison of data mining and GDD-based models in discrimination of corn phenology. Int J Plant Prod 13 (1): 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-018-0030-2
Heupel K, Spengler D, Itzerott S, 2018. A progressive crop-type classification using multitemporal remote sensing data and phenological information. J Photogram Remote Sens Geoinform Sci 86: 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41064-018-0050-7
Huete AR, Didan K, Miura T, Rodríguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira G, 2002. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83: 195-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2
Hufkens K, Melaas EK, Mann ML, Foster T, Ceballos F, Robles M, Kramer B, 2019. Monitoring crop phenology using a smartphone based near-surface remote sensing approach. Agr Forest Meteorol 265: 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.002
INIFAP, 2017. Agenda Técnica Agrícola Sinaloa. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias. Ciudad de México, México. 209 pp.
Jensen JR, 2007. Remote sensing of the environment: an earth resource perspective, 2nd ed Prentice Hall series in geographic information science, USA. ISBN 0-13-188950-8. 592 pp.
Kamble B, Kilic A, Hubbard K, 2013. Estimating crop coefficients using remote sensing-based vegetation index. Remote Sens 5: 1588-1602. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs5041588
Kimball BA, White JW, Wall GW, Ottman MJ, 2012. Infrared-warmed and unwarmed wheat vegetation indices coalesce using canopy-temperature-based growing degree days. Agron J 104 (1): 114-118. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0144
Liao CH, Wang J, Dong T, Shang J, Liu J, Song Y, 2019. Using spatio-temporal fusion of Landsat-8 and MODIS data to derive phenology, biomass and yield estimates for corn and soybean. Sci Total Environ 650: 1707-1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.308
Matsushita B, Yang W, Chen J, Onda Y, Qiu G, 2007. Sensitivity of the enhanced vegetation index (EVI) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) to topographic effects: A case study in high-density cypress forest. Sensors 7: 2636-2651. https://doi.org/10.3390/s7112636
Mavi HS, Tupper GJ, 2004. Environtmental temperature and crop production. In: Agrometeorology: principles and applications of climate studies in agriculture, Chapter 3, pp: 43-70. The Haworth Press Inc., NY. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781482277999
NASA, 2019. Landsat image gallery. https://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/
Ojeda-Bustamante W, Sifuentes-Ibarra E, Unland-Weiss H, 2006. Programación integral del riego en maíz en el norte de Sinaloa, México. Agrociencia (Mexico) 40 (1): 13-25.
Ojeda-Bustamante W, González-Camacho JM, Sifuentes-Ibarra E, Isidro E, Rendón-Pimentel L, 2007. Using spatial information systems to improve water management in Mexico. Agr Water Manage 89: 81-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2006.11.002
Ojeda-Bustamante W, Sifuentes-Ibarra E, Ontiveros CRE, Iñiguez CM, Rojano AA, 2014. Proyecciones de cambio climático para el estado de Sinaloa. In: Sinaloa y el cambio climático global; Flores-Campaña LM et al. (eds), pp: 115-131. Instituto de Apoyo a la Investigación e Innovación y Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, Culiacán, Mexico.
QGIS, 2019. User Guide. Release 3.4. QGIS Project. https://www.qgis.org/en/docs
Reed, BC, Brown JF, Vanderzee DL, Thomas RM, James W, Ohlen DO, 1994. Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery. J Veg Sci 5: 703-714. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235884
Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Benson GO, 1992. How a corn plant develops. Special report 48 (rev.). Iowa State University. Coop. Ext. Serv., Ames, IA, USA.
Roth GW, Yocum JO, 1997. Use of hybrid growing degree day ratings for corn in the northeastern USA. J Prod Agr 10: 283-288. https://doi.org/10.2134/jpa1997.0283
Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW, 1974. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. Proc Third Earth Resources Technology Satellite-1 Symp. Greenbelt: NASA SP-351, 3010-3017.
SIAP, 2019. Avance de siembras y cosechas. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera, Gobierno de Mexico.
Sifuentes E, Macías J, Ruelas JR, Preciado P, Ojeda W, Inzunza MA, Samaniego JA, 2015. Mejoramiento del grado de uso del nitrógeno en maíz, mediante técnicas parcelarias de riego por superficie. Rev Mex Cienc Agr 6 (8): 1903-1914. https://doi.org/10.29312/remexca.v6i8.528
Teal RK, Tubana BS, Girma K, Freeman KW, Arnall DB, Walsh O, 2006. In-season prediction of corn grain yield potential using normalized difference vegetation index. Agron J 98: 1488-1494. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0103
Tsouros DC, Bibi S, Sarigiannidis PG, 2019. A review on UAV-based applications for precision agriculture. Information 10 (11): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10110349
UAS, 2014. Sinaloa ante el cambio climático global; Flores Campiña LM et al., Ed. Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa, México. ISBN: 978-607-737-051-2. 385 pp.
USGS, 2018. USGS Global visualization viewer (Glovis). United States Geological Survey. https://glovis.usgs.gov/
USGS, 2019. Landsat 8 (L8) data users handbook Version 4.0. United States Geological Survey, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Viña A, Gitelson AA, Rundquist DC, Keydan G, Leavitt B, Schepers J, 2004. Monitoring corn (Zea mays L.) phenology with remote sensing. Agron J 96: 1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.1139
Wei Y, Tong X, Cheng G, Liu D, Han Z, 2019. Remote detection of large-area crop types: The role of plant phenology and topography. Agriculture 9 (7): 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9070150
Whitcraft AK, Vermote EF, Becker RI, Justice CO, 2015. Cloud cover throughout the agricultural growing season: impacts on passive optical earth observations. Remote Sens Environ 156: 438-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.009
Zhong L, Gong P, Biging GS, 2014. Efficient corn and soybean mapping with temporal extendability: a multi-year experiment using Landsat imagery. Remote Sens Environ 140: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.08.023
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
