A method to optimize the pesticide dose considering the combined influence of plant, pest, pesticide, and spray equipment on bioefficacy

Keywords: bioassay, electrostatic spray, controlled droplet applicator, optimal dose, imidachloprid

Abstract

Aim of the study: To develop a method to optimize the pesticide dose considering the combined influence of plant, pest, pesticide, and spray equipment on bioefficacy.

Area of study: Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, India.

Material and methods: A controlled droplet applicator generated droplets from 200 to 50 μm. The target leaf's deposition density of a preset droplet size can be controlled by timing the spray. A sequence of bioassays was performed at various droplet densities at each pesticide (imidachloprid 17.8% SL) dose and droplet size to determine the mortality of cotton aphids (Aphis gossypii) and jassids (Amrasca biguttula) feeding on immature cotton plants. Calculating the number of droplets per target area needed to cause 50% and 90% mortality (LN50 and LN90) yielded a series of model curves. Field tests were done on the computed optimal doses of the pesticide for a spray apparatus (electrostatically charged spray) to assess the spray's bioefficacy against A. gossypii and A. biguttula.

Main results: In comparison to uncharged mist blower spray, which had a bioefficacy of 91% for an LN90 dose of 110 g a.i. L-1, the spray had an 89% bioefficacy on A. gossypii. Using the electrostatic spray, it was 91% effective against A. biguttula and 98% effective against an uncharged mist blower at a dose of 110 g a.i. L-1 of LN90.

Research highlights: This generalized method of modelling could effectively compute the optimal pesticide dose for any plant, pest, pesticide, and spray equipment combination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abhilash PC, Singh N, 2009. Pesticide use and application: an Indian scenario. J Hazard Mater 1651(3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.061

Agoramoorthy G, 2008. Can India meet the increasing food demand by 2020? Futures 40(5): 503-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.10.008

Barba-Brioso C, Fernández-Caliani JC, Miras A, Cornejo J, Galán E, 2010. Multi-source water pollution in a highly anthropized wetland system associated with the estuary of Huelva (SW Spain). Mar Pollut Bull 60(8): 1259-1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.03.018

Doruchowski G, 2017. Harmonization of dose expression is the key to dose adjustment. 14th Workshop on Spray Application in Fruit Growing. Suprofruit. Hasselt, Belgium, pp: 10-12.

Duke SO, 2017. Pesticide dose-A parameter with many implications. In: Pesticide dose: Effects on the environment and target and non-target organisms, chapt 1, pp: 1-13. ACS Symp Series, Vol 1249. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1249.ch001

Giles D, Blewett T, 1991. Effects of conventional and reduced-volume, charged-spray application techniques on dislodgeable foliar residue of captan on strawberries. J Agr Food Chem 39(9): 1646-1651. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00009a600

Heijne CG, 1981. Development of a spinning cup for controlled droplet application of pesticides. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis. Imperial College of Science and Technology, Berkshire, London University.

Henderson CF, Tilton EW, 1955. Tests with acaricides against the brown wheat mite. J Econ Entomol 48(2): 157-161. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/48.2.157

Hermosin MC, Calderon MJ, Real M, Cornejo J, 2013. Impact of herbicides used in olive groves on waters of the Guadalquivir river basin (southern Spain). Agr Ecosyst Environ 164: 229-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.021

Hovde DA, 1989. Pesticide formulations and application systems, Vol. 8. ASTM International. https://doi.org/10.1520/STP980-EB

Kumar R, Kranthi S, Nitharwal M, Jat SL, Monga D, 2012. Influence of pesticides and application methods on pest and predatory arthropods associated with cotton. Phytoparasitica 40(5): 417-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-012-0241-5

Law SE, Lane MD, 1981. Electrostatic deposition of pesticide spray onto foliar targets of varying morphology. T ASAE 24(6): 1441-1445. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.34469

Maski D, Durairaj D, 2010a. Effects of charging voltage, application speed, target height, and orientation upon charged spray deposition on leaf abaxial and adaxial surfaces. Crop Prot 29(2): 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.10.006

Maski D, Durairaj D, 2010b. Effects of electrode voltage, liquid flow rate, and liquid properties on spray chargeability of an air-assisted electrostatic-induction spray-charging system. J Electrostat 68(2): 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2009.12.001

Naik VCB, Kranthi S, Viswakarma R, 2017. Impact of newer pesticides and botanicals on sucking pest management in cotton under high density planting system (HDPS) in India. J Entomol Zool Stud 5(6): 1083-1087.

Nemade PW, Wadaskar RM, Ughade J, Sable YR, Rathod TH, 2017. Validation of recommended doses of insecticides against sucking pests of BT cotton. J Entomol Zool Stud 5(3): 256-260.

Neto JG, Da Cunha JPAR, Almeida VV, Alves GS, 2015. Spray deposition on coffee leaves from airblast sprayers with and without electrostatic charge. Biosci J 31(5): 1296-1303. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v31n5a2015-26876

Nihal R, Bala SC, 2020. Bio-efficacy of some newer insecticides against Aphis gossypii and Amrasca biguttula biguttula infesting bt cotton. Pestic Res J 32(1): 134-139. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-524X.2020.00017.5

R Core Team, 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.

Ramalakshmi V, Dash L, Padhy D, 2020. Bio efficacy of different novel insecticides against aphid, A. gossypii in transgenic cotton. J Entomol Zool Stud 8(2): 1634-1637.

Robles-Molina J, Gilbert-López B, García-Reyes JF, Molina-Díaz A, 2014. Monitoring of selected priority and emerging contaminants in the Guadalquivir River and other related surface waters in the province of Jaén, South East Spain. Sci Total Environ 479: 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.121

Salyani M, 1998. Effects of flow rate and rotational speed on performance of two rotary atomizers. In: Pesticide formulations and application systems, Vol 18. ASTM International.

Salyani M, Cromwell RP, 1992. Spray drift from ground and aerial applications. T ASAE 35(4): 1113-1120. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28708

Velini ED, Carbonari CA, Trindade MLB, Gomes GLGC, 2017. Variations in pesticide doses under field conditions. In: Pesticide dose: Effects on the environment and target and non-target organisms. ACS Symp Series, Am Chem Soc, Washington DC, 1249, pp: 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2017-1249.ch004

Wolf TM, Downer RA, Hall FR, Wagner OB, Kuhn P, 1996. Effect of electrostatic charging on the dose transfer of water-based pesticide mixtures. In: Pesticide formulations and application systems, Vol. 15. ASTM International.

Zabkiewicz JA, 2007. Spray formulation efficacy- holistic and futuristic perspectives. Crop Prot 26: 312-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2005.08.019

Published
2023-07-31
How to Cite
DURAIRAJ , D., & JYOTI, B. (2023). A method to optimize the pesticide dose considering the combined influence of plant, pest, pesticide, and spray equipment on bioefficacy. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 21(3), e0208. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2023213-19738
Section
Agricultural engineering