Development of an electronic profilometer to measure mobilization variables in soil harrowing
Abstract
Aim of study: This experiment's objective is to develop an automatic data acquisition system for profilometry, evaluating four harrowing speeds.
Area of study: Federal University of Parana, Curitiba, Brazil.
Material and methods: We experimented at the laboratory using a completely randomized design, comparing the data of modified roughness, raised and mobilized area, blistering, and thickness. These were acquired with traditional and electronic profilometers in seven replications. We executed the field test in lines, using a completely randomized design. The profilometers were in the plots and the targeted speeds in the subplots. We submitted the data for analysis of variance and when significant, to Tukey's test and regression analysis.
Main results: Laboratory testing showed no significant difference in the parameters of modified roughness, elevated and mobilized area, blistering, and thickness, denoting the phase validation that indicates applicability in the field. The field testing presented superior results for the electronic profilometer in elevated and mobilized areas and soil layer thickness. That is due to the absence of interference in the measurements that occur in the conventional profilometer caused by the insertion of the rods in the soil.
Research highlights: The increase in the mechanized set speed provided the reduction of the elevated area and soil blistering caused by the rise in disc rotation and consequent deviation of the soil particles.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi I, 2018. A draught force estimator for disc harrow using the laws of classical soil mechanics. Biosyst Eng 171: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.04.008
American Society of Agricultural Biological Engineers, 2011. ASABE 496.3: Agricultural machinery management data. St. Joseph, MI, USA.
Bögel T, Osinenko P, Herlitzius T, 2016. Assessment of soil roughness after tillage using spectral analysis. Soil Till Res 159: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.02.004
Borges DF, Gonçalves FAR, Junior JDG, Souza CFE, Carvalho Filho A, 2019. Perfilômetro de barra corrediça: avaliação de metodologia para análise da rugosidade do solo. Energia na Agricultura 34: 471-478. https://doi.org/10.17224/EnergAgric.2019v34n4p471-478
Carvalho Filho A, Centurion JF, Silva RPD, Furlani CE, Carvalho LC, 2007. Soil tillage methods: alterations in the roughness of the soil. Engenharia Agrícola 27: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162007000100017
Deutsches Institut für Normung, 1986. DIN 70020: Automotive engineering, maximum speed, acceleration, and other terms, definitions, and tests. Berlin.
Ewetumo T, Egbedele IA, Joseph-Ojo CI, Fagbamiye-Akinwale OM, 2019. Development of low-cost soil tillage profilometer. Icon Res Eng J 3: 365-371.
Fanigliulo R, Antonucci F, Figorilli S, Pochi D, Pallottino F, Fornaciari L, et al., 2020. Light drone-based application to assess soil tillage quality parameters. Sensors 20: 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030728
Feng Q, An C, Chen Z, Wang Z, 2020. Can deep tillage enhance carbon sequestration in soils? A meta-analysis towards GHG mitigation and sustainable agricultural management. Renew Sust Energ Rev 133: 110293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110293
Ferenčík M, Kardoš M, Allman M, Slatkovská Z, 2019. Detection of forest road damage using mobile laser profilometry. Comput Electr Agr 166: 105010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.105010
Foldager FF, Pedersen JM, Haubro Skov E, Evgrafova A, Green O, 2019. Lidar-based 3d scans of soil surfaces and furrows in two soil types. Sensors 19: 661-613. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030661
Francetto TR, Alonço ADS, Becker RS, Scherer VP, Bellé MP, 2021. Effect of the distance between the cutting disc and furrow openers employed in row crop planting on soil mobilization. Engenharia Agrícola 41: 148-160. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-eng.agric.v41n2p148-160/2021
Gilliot JM, Vaudour E, Michelin J, 2017. Soil surface roughness measurement: A new fully automatic photogrammetric approach applied to agricultural bare fields. Comput Electr Agr 134: 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.010
Kogut Z, Sergiel L, Żurek G, 2016. The effect of the disc setup angles and working depth on disc harrow working resistance. Biosyst Eng 151: 328-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2016.10.004
Kool D, Tong B, Tian Z, Heitman JL, Sauer TJ, Horton R, 2019. Soil water retention and hydraulic conductivity dynamics following tillage. Soil Till Res 193: 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.05.020
Laskoski M, Pereira TE, Kmiecik LL, Bueno LDSR, Jasper SP, 2017. Desenvolvimento, construção e validação do perfilômetro a laser. REVENG 25: 132-138. https://doi.org/10.13083/reveng.v25i2.752
Martinez‐Agirre A, Álvarez‐Mozos J, Milenković M, Pfeifer N, Giménez R, Valle JM, Rodríguez Á, 2020. Evaluation of terrestrial laser scanner and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques for quantifying soil surface roughness parameters over agricultural soils. Earth Surf Proc Landforms 45: 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4758
Miller A, 1997. Strip-plot configurations of fractional factorials. Technometrics 39: 2-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1997.10485080
Polyakov V, Nearing M, 2019. A simple automated laser profile meter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 83: 327-331. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2018.10.0378
Tian H, Wang T, Liu Y, Qiao X, Li Y, 2020. Computer vision technology in agricultural automation-A review. Inform Process Agr 7: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpa.2019.09.006
Uddin MJ, Moheuddin MM, Kowsher M, 2019. A new study of trapezoidal, simpson's 1/3 and simpson's 3/8 rules of numerical integral problems. Appl Math Sci 6: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.5121/mathsj.2019.6401
Vasil'ev SA, Alekseev VА, Vasil'ev MA, Vasil'ev AA, 2021. Features of using a ground laser profiler to assess the quality of soil cultivation on agricultural slope landscapes. Agr Eng 16-23.
Copyright (c) 2023 CSIC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
