Simulating cotton yield response to deficit irrigation with the FAO AquaCrop model
Abstract
The Food and Agriculture Organization has reflected the importance of predicting yield response to water by developing the AquaCrop model. During three growing seasons (2007-2009), a field experiment was conducted in the South-East of Damascus (Syria) to assess the response of drip irrigated cotton grown under full (FI) and deficit irrigation (80, 65, 50% of FI). Input data and comparisons between simulated and observed canopy cover (CC), biomass production at harvesting, final seed cotton yield, and soil water content using data sets of the 2007 season, were used for model calibration. The calibrated model was validated using data sets of the 2008 and 2009 seasons, getting accurate simulation results for CC [root mean square error (RMSE) = 6.5%] and actual evapotranspiration- ETa (RMSE = 25 mm, index of agreement = 0.99). The predicted seed cotton yields were within 6% of measurements. The model predictions of soil water content in the 0.60 m profile were close in the general trend to the measurements. In spite of the good prediction of ETa and seed cotton yield for each treatment, there is an apparent tendency for AquaCrop to over-estimate water use efficiency (WUE) under water-deficit conditions. Therefore, in cases of limited input data, the AquaCrop could be a promising model for estimating crop productivity under deficit irrigation conditions.Downloads
References
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrig Drain Paper No. 56. FAO, Rome.
Arslan A., Razzouk A.K., Al-Ain F., 1997. The performance and radiation exposure of some neutron probes in measuring the water content of the topsoil layer. Aust J Soil Res 35, 1397-1407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/S96111
Basal H., Dagdelen N., Unay A., Yilmaz E., 2009. Effects of deficit drip irrigation on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield and fibre quality. J Agron Crop Sci 195, 19-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00340.x
Dagdelen N., Yilmaz E., Sezgin F., Gurbuz T., 2006. Water-yield relation and water use efficiency of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) and second crop corn (Zea mays L.) in western Turkey. Agric Water Manage 82, 63-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.05.006
Detar W.R., 2008. Yield and growth characteristics for cotton under various irrigation regimes on sandy soil. Agric Water Manag 95, 69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009
Du T., Kang S., Zhang J., Li F., 2008. Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China. Irrig Sci 26, 147-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0081-0
Farahani H.J., Izzi G., Oweis T.Y., 2009. Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron J 101, 469–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0182s
Fereres E., Soriano M.A., 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58, 147-159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl165
García-Vila M., Fereres E., Mateos L., Orgaz F., Steduto P., 2009. Deficit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agron J 101, 477–487. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0179s
Heng L.K., Hsiao T.C., Evett S., Howell T., Steduto P., 2009. Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient field maize. Agron J 101, 488–498. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0029xs
Howell T.A., Evett S.R., Tolk J.A., Schneider A.D., 2004. Evapotranspiration of full-, deficit-irrigated, and dryland cotton on the Northen Texas High Plains. J Irrig Drain Eng 130, 277-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2004)130:4(277)
Hsiao T.C., Heng L.K., Steduto P., Rojas-Lara B., Raes D., Fereres E., 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: III. Parameterization and testing for maize. Agron J 101, 448–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0218s
Janat M., 2004. Assessment of nitrogen content, uptake, partitioning, and recovery by cotton crop grown under surface irrigation and drip fertigation using isotopic technique. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 35, 2515-2535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1081/LCSS-200030355
Pettigrew W.T., 2004. Moisture deficit effects on cotton lint yield, yield components, and boll distribution. Agron J 96, 377-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2004.0377
Raes D., Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., Fereres E., 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron J 101, 438–447. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0140s
Raes D., Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., Fereres E., Izzi G., Heng L.K., 2010. AquaCrop (version 3.1) reference manual. FAO, Rome.
Steduto P., Hsiao T.C., Raes D., Fereres E., 2009. AquaCrop—the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron J 101, 426–437. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0139s
Todorovic M., Albrizio R., Zivotic L., Abi Saab M., Stöckle C., Steduto P., 2009. Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron J 101, 509–521. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0166s
Wanjura D.F., Upchurch D.R., Mahan J.R., Bruke J.J., 2002. Cotton yield and applied water relationships under drip irrigation. Agric Water Manage 55, 217-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(01)00175-5
Willmott C.J., 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63, 1309-1313. 2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.