Post-market environmental monitoring of Bt maize in Spain: Non-target effects of varieties derived from the event MON810 on predatory fauna
Abstract
The Spanish Government has established post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) as mandatory for genetically modified (GM) crop varieties cultivated in Spain. In order to comply with this regulation, effects of Bt maize varieties derived from the event MON810 on the predatory fauna were monitored for two years in northeast and central Spain. The study was carried out with a randomized block design in maize fields of 3-4 ha on which the abundance of plant-dwelling predators and the activity-density of soil-dwelling predators in Bt vs. non-Bt near-isogenic varieties were compared. To this end, the plots were sampled by visual inspection of a certain number of plants and pitfall traps 6 or 7 times throughout two seasons. No significant differences in predator densities on plants were found between Bt and non-Bt varieties. In the pitfall traps, significant differences between the two types of maize were found only in Staphylinidae, in which trap catches in non-Bt maize were higher than in Bt maize in central Spain. Based on the statistical power of the assays, surrogate arthropods for PMEM purposes are proposed; Orius spp. and Araneae for visual sampling and Carabidae, Araneae, and Staphylinidae for pitfall trapping. The other predator groups recorded in the study, Nabis sp. and Coccinellidae in visual sampling and Dermaptera in pitfall trapping, gave very poor power results. To help to establish a standardized protocol for PMEM of genetically modified crops, the effect-detecting capacity with a power of 0.8 of each predator group is given.Downloads
References
Albajes R, López C, Pons X, 2003. Predatory fauna in cornfields and response to imidacloprid seed treatment. J Econ Entomol 96: 1805-1813.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.6.1805
PMid:14977119
Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2009. Responsiveness of arthropod herbivores and their natural enemies to modified weed management in corn. Environ Entomol 38: 944-954.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/022.038.0349
PMid:19508806
Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons, X, 2011. Two heteropteran predators in relation to weed management in herbicide-tolerant corn. Biol Control 59: 30-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.03.008
Asín L, Pons X, 1998. Role of predators on corn aphid populations, In: Aphids in natural and managed ecosystems (Nieto JM and Dixon AFG, eds). Univ León, León, Spain. pp: 505-511.
Balog A, Kiss J, Szekeres D, Szénási A, Markó V, 2010. Rove beetles communities in transgenic Bt (MON810) and near isogenic maize. Crop Prot 29: 567- 571.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2009.12.020 BOE, 1996. Order 6951/1998, of 23 March, that modifies General Regulation of Commercial Variety Register. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 73, 26/3/1998. [In Spanish].
Castañera P, Ortego F, Hernández-Crespo P, Farinós GP, Albajes R, Eizaguirre M, López C, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2010. El maíz Bt en España: experiencia tras 12 años de cultivo. Phytoma 219, 64-70. [In Spanish].
Cohen J, 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Psychology Press, NY, 567 pp.
De La Poza M, Pons X, Farinós GP, López C, Ortego F, Eizaguirre M, Castañera P, Albajes R, 2005. Impact of farm-scale Bt maize on abundance of predatory arthropods in Spain. Crop Prot 24: 677-684.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2004.12.003
Duan JJ, Jian C, Head GP, Bhatti MA, Ward DP, Levine SL, Nickson TE, Nemeth MA, 2006. Power statistical analysis of a 2-year field study and design of experiments to evaluate non-target effects of genetically modified Bacillus thuringiensis corn. Ecol Entomol 31: 521-531.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2006.00811.x
EFSA, 2006. Opinion of the scientific panel on genetically modified organisms on the post market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 319: 1-27.
EFSA, 2011. EFSA Panel on GMO; scientific opinion on guidance on the post-market environmental monitoring (PMEM) of genetically modified plants. EFSA J 9(8): 2316.
Farinós GP, De La Poza M, Hernández-Crespo P, Ortego F, Castañera P, 2008. Diversity and seasonal phenology of aboveground arthropods in conventional and transgenic maize crops in Central Spain. Biol Control 44: 362-371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2007.11.007
García M, Ortego F, Castañera P, Farinós GP, 2010. Effects of exposure to the toxin Cry1Ab through Bt maize fed-prey on the performance and digestive physiology of the predatory rove beetle Atheta coriaria. Biol Control 55: 225-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2010.08.002
Gomez KA, Gomez AA, 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research, 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, NY, 680 pp.
Jasinski JR, Eisley JB, Young CE, Kovach J, Willson H, 2003. Select non-target arthropod abundance in transgenic and non-transgenic field crops in Ohio. Environ Entomol 32: 407-413.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.2.407
Lang A, Filser J, Henschel JR, 1999. Predation by ground beetles and wolf spiders on herbivorous insects in a maize crop. Agr Ecosyst Environ 72: 189-199.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00186-8
Lumbierres B, Starý P, Pons X, 2011. Effect of Bt maize on the plant-aphid-parasitoid tritrophic relationships. BioControl 56: 133-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10526-010-9317-7 MARM, 2011. Estimación de la superficie total de variedades OMG cultivadas en España [on line]. Available in http://www.marm.es/es/agricultura/estadísticas/ [12 December, 2011]. [In Spanish].
Meissle M, Lang A, 2005. Comparing methods to evaluate the effects of Bt maize and insecticide on spider assemblages. Agr Ecosyst Environ 107: 359-370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.12.007
Musser FR, Shelton AM, 2003. Bt sweet corn and selective insecticides: impacts on pests and predators. J Econ Entomol 96: 71-80.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.1.71
PMid:12650347
Nakagawa S, Foster TM, 2004. The case against retrospective statistical analyses with an introduction to power analysis. Acta Ethol 7: 103-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10211-004-0095-z
Naranjo SE, 2005. Long-term assessment of the effects of transgenic Bt cotton on the function of the natural enemy community. Environ Entomol 34: 1211-1223.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2005)034[1211:LAOTEO]2.0.CO;2
Ortego F, Pons X, Albajes R, Castañera P, 2009. European commercial genetically modified plantings and field trials. In: Environmental impact of genetically modified crops (Ferry N & Gatehaouse AMR, eds). CAB Int, Wallingford, UK. pp: 327-343.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9781845934095.0327
Perry J, Rothery P, Clark SJ, Heard MS, Hawes C, 2003. Design, analysis, and statistical power of the farm-scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. J Appl Ecol 40: 17-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00786.x
Perry JR, Ter Braak CJF, Dixon P M, Duan JJ, Hails RS, Huesken A, Lavielle M, Marvier M, Scardi M, Schmidt K, Tothmeresz B, Schaarschmidt F, Van Der Voet H, 2009. Statistical aspects of environmental risk assessment of GM plants for effects on non-target organisms. Environ Biosafety Res 8: 65-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ebr/2009009
PMid:19833074
Pons X, Lumbierres B, López C, Albajes R, 2005. Abundance of non-target pests in transgenic Bt-maize: a farm scale study. European J Entomol 102: 73-79.
Prasifka JR Hellmich RL, Dively GP, Higgins LS, Dixon PM, Duan JJ, 2008. Selection of nontarget arthropod taxa for field research on insecticidal transgenic crops: using empirical data and statistical power. Environ Entomol 37: 1-10.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X(2008)37[1:SONATF]2.0.CO;2
SAS, 2008. JMP® 8. User Guide. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA. 515 pp.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.