The impact of information and other factors on on-farm agrobiodiversity conservation: evidence from a duration analysis of Portuguese fruit growers

  • A. Botelho
  • I. Dinis
  • L. Costa Pinto
Keywords: adoption models, ‘Bravo’ apple, econometric models, in-situ conservation, landraces


In spite of the increasing awareness of the importance of in situ and on-farm conservation of agro biodiversity, there is still limited knowledge about the factors that influence farmers’ choices in variety adoption. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to a better understanding of the factors that influence farmers’ adoption of traditional varieties of fruit trees so that better and more effective policy measures aiming at their preservation can be designed. While studies in this area have mainly employed standard probit/logit techniques, in this paper, an econometric technique which addresses simultaneously the issue of sample censoring and the joint determination of the occurrence and timing of adoptions —duration analysis— was applied. The use of this technique in the analysis of adoption data uncovers a sizably higher effect of information on farmers’ decisions than that obtained by standard approaches. The results strongly support the idea that good extension services providing reliable and accessible information, as well as technical guidance adapted to local conditions, are fundamental components in determining the adoption of landraces.


Download data is not yet available.


Bartoloni E, Baussola M, 2001. The determinants of technology adoption in Italian manufacturing industries. Rev Ind Organ 19(3), 305-328.

Bellon M, 1996. The dynamics of crop infraspecific diversity: a conceptual framework at the farmer level. Econ Bot 50, 26-39.

Bellon M, Taylor J, 1993. Folk soil taxonomy and the partial adoption of new seed varieties. Econ Dev Cult Change 41, 763-786.

Bergström R, Edin P, 1992. Time aggregation and the distributional shape of unemployment duration. J Appl Econ 7(1), 5-30.

Beus E, Dunlap R, 1990. Conventional versus alternative agriculture: the paradigmatic roots of the debate. Rural Sociol 55(4), 590-616.

Beus E, Dunlap R, 1991. Measuring adherence to alternative vs. conventional agricultural paradigms: a proposed scale. Rural Sociol 56(3), 432-460.

Bhattacharya S, Chatterjee K, Samuelson L, 1986. Sequential research and the adoption of innovations. Oxford Econ Pap 38 (suppl), 219-243.

Brush S, Taylor J, Bellon M, 1992. Technology adoption and biological diversity in Andean potato agriculture. J Dev Econ 39, 365-387.

Brush S, Meng E, 1998. Farmer’s valuation and conservation of crop genetic resources. Genet Resour Crop Ev 45, 139-150.

Burton M, Rigby D, Young T, 2003. Modelling the adoption of organic horticultural technology in the UK using duration analysis. Aust J Agr Resour Econ 47(1), 29-54.

Caffey R, Kazmierczak R, 1994. Factors influencing technology adoption in a Louisiana aquaculture system. J Agr Appl Econ 26(1), 264-274.

Collet D, 1994. Modelling survival data in medical research. Chapman & Hall, London.

Colombo M, Mosconi R, 1995. Complementary and cumulative learning effects in the early diffusion of multiple technologies. J Ind Econ 43(1), 13-48.

Comer S, Ekanem E, Muhammed S, Singh S, Teguegue F, 1999. Sustainable and conventional farmers: a comparison of socio-economic characteristics, attitudes and beliefs. J Sustain Agr 15(1), 29-45.

Cox D, 1972. Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B 30, 187-220.

Davies S, 1979. The diffusion of process innovation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK.

Dimara E, Skuras D, 1998. Adoption of new tobacco varieties in Greece: impacts of empirical findings on policy design. Agr Econ 19(3), 297-307.

Dinis I, 2007. Determinantes da adopção de variedades tradicionais de macieiras. Doctoral thesis. Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, Porto. [In Portuguese].

European Environment Agency, 2007. Europe’s environment: The fourth assessment. EEA, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Faria A, Fenn P, Bruce A, 2002. Determinants of adoption of flexible production technologies: Evidence from Portuguese manufacturing industry. Econ Innov New Technol 11(6), 569-80.

Feder G, O’Mara G, 1982. On information and innovation diffusion: a Bayesian approach. Am J Agr Econ 64, 145-147.

Feder G, Slade R, 1984. The acquisition of information and the adoption of new technology. Am J Agr Econ 66, 312-320.

Feder G, Just R, Zilberman D, 1985. Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: a survey. Econ Dev Cult Change 33, 255-298.

Feder G, Umali D, 1993 The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review. Technol Forecast Soc 43, 215-239.

Fischer A, Arnold A, Gibbs M, 1996. Information and the speed of innovation adoption. Am J Agr Econ 78, 1073-1081.

Foltz J, Chang H, 2002. The adoption and profitability of rbST on Connecticut dairy farms. Am J Agr Econ 84(4), 1021-1032.

Fudenberg D, Tirole J, 1985. Pre-emption and rent equalisation in the adoption of new technology. Rev Econ Stud 52, 383-401.

Gasson R, 1988. Farm diversification and rural development. J Agr Econ 39, 175-182.

Genius M, Pantzios C, TzouvelekasV, 2006. Information acquisition and adoption of organic farming practices. J Agr Resour Econ 31(1), 93-113.

Ghadim A, Pannell D, 1999. A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agr Econ 21(2), 145-154.

Griliches Z, 1957. An exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 25, 501-523.

Heffernan W, Green G, 1986. Farm size and soil loss: prospects for a sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociol 51, 31-42.

Hougaard P, 1986. Survival models for heterogeneous populations derived from stable distributions. Biometrika 73, 387-396.

Ireland N, Stoneman P, 1985. Order effects, perfect foresight and intertemporal price discrimination. Recherche Economic de Louvain 51(1), 7-20.

Ireland N, Stoneman P, 1986. Technological diffusion, expectation and welfare, Oxford Econ Pap 38, 283-304.

IUCN, 2007. 2007 IUCN Red list of threatened species. Available in [26 October 2007].

Kallas Z, Serra T, Gil J, 2009. Farmer’s objectives as determinant factors of organic farming adoption.Paper presented at the 113th EAAE Seminar, Chania, Crete, Greece, September 3-6.

Karshenas M, Stoneman P, 1993. Rank, stock, order and epidemic effects in the diffusion of new process technologies: an empirical model. Rand J Econ 24, 503-528.

Khanna M, Epouhe O, Hornbaker R, 1999. Site-specific crop management: adoption patterns and incentives. Rev Agr Econ 21(2), 455-472.

Kislev Y, Shchori-Bachrach R, 1973. The process of an innovation cycle. Am J Agr Econ 55, 28-37.

Klotz C, Saha A, Butler L, 1995. The role of information in technology adoption: The case of rbST in the California dairy industry. Rev Agr Econ 17(3), 287-298.

Läpple D, 2003. Adoption and abandonment of organic farming: an empirical investigation of the Irish drystock sector. J Agr Econ 61(3), 697-714.

Leathers Z, Smale M, 1991. A Bayesian approach to explaining sequential adoption of components of a technological package. Am J Agr Econ 73(3), 734-742.

Mansfield E, 1961. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica 29, 741-765.

Martínez M, García J, Martínez U, 2005. La difusión de la agricultura ecológica en España: una propuesta de modelización matemática. Rev Estud Agrosoc Pesq 205, 39-63. [In Spanish].

Mathijs E, 2003. Social capital and farmers’ willingness to adopt country side stewardship schemes. Outlook Agr 32(1), 13-16.

Negatu W, Parikh A, 1999. The impact of perception and other factors on the adoption of agricultural technology in the Moret and Jiru Woreda (district) of Ethiopia. Agr Econ 21(2), 205-216.

Nowak P, 1987. The adoption of agricultural conservation technologies: economic and diffusion explanations. Rural Sociol 52, 208-220.

Pregibon D, 1980. Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. App Stat 29, 15-24.

Rahm M, Huffman W, 1984. The adoption of reduced tillage: the role of human capital and others variables. Am J Agr Econ, November, 405-413.

Reinganum J, 1981. Market structure and the diffusion of new technology. Bell J Econ 12(2), 618-624.

Rogers E, 1962. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press of Glencoe, NY, USA.

Rogers E, 2003. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. Free Press, NY, USA.

Ryan B, Gross N, 1943. The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol 8, 15-24.

Saha A, Love H, Schwart R, 1994. Adoption of emerging technologies under output uncertainty. Am J Agr Econ 76(4), 836-846.

Shucksmith M, Smith R, 1991. Farm household strategies and pluriactivity in Upland Scotland. J Agr Econ 42, 340-353.

Somda J, Nianogo J, Nassa S, Sanou S, 2002 Soil fertility management and socio-economic factors in crop-livestock systems in Burkina Faso: A case study of composting technology. Ecol Econ 43(2-3), 175-183.

StataCorp, 2005. Stata base reference manual. Release 9. Stata Press, College Station, TX, USA.

Stoneman P, 1981. Intra firm diffusion, Bayesian learning and Profitability. Econ J 91, 375-388.

Tsur Y, Sternberg M, Hochman E, 1990. Dynamic modelling of innovation process adoption and learning. Oxford Econ Pap 42, 336-355.

How to Cite
Botelho, A., Dinis, I., & Costa Pinto, L. (1). The impact of information and other factors on on-farm agrobiodiversity conservation: evidence from a duration analysis of Portuguese fruit growers. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1), 3-17.
Agricultural economics