Visual definition of physiological maturity in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is associated with receptacle quantitative color parameters

  • L. F. Hernandez Laboratorio de Morfología Vegetal. Depto. de Agronomía, UNSur. Bahía Blanca, 8000
  • A. O. Larsen Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow. INTA - MAA. CEI Barrow Ruta 3 Km 487, 7500
Keywords: color correlation, CIELAB, fruit growth, yield.

Abstract

Identifying physiological maturity (PM) in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) by visual methods is subjective. The present study was conducted during two years in two short season sunflower hybrids (Macón and MG60) to determine the relationship between quantitative color parameters in the receptacle and physiological markers such as fruit dry weight (FDW) and fruit water content (FWC) from flowering to PM. Fruits from the external 25% of the capitulum radius were sampled at 3-5-day intervals from first anthesis until harvest maturity. Fruit and receptacle fresh and dry weight were calculated, and color changes of the receptacle base were followed over time using a spectrophotometer. Comparison of colorimetric coordinates a* and b*, defined by the CIELAB color space enabled quantitative correlation of color changes in the receptacle with the maturation stage of the fruits and their moisture content. In both hybrids and years, fruits attained maximum dry weight when the receptacle color turned from dark green to buttery-yellow. Strong correlations were found between FWC and a* for Macón the first (r=-0.877) and second year (r=-0.934) and for MG60, (r=-0.912 and r=-0.891) the first and second year, respectively. The same results were found for b* for Macón (r=-0.901 and r=-0.829) and for MG60 (r=-0.898 and r= -0.863) for the first and second year respectively. Maximum b* at FWC between 40 to 41% had the highest correlation with maximum fruit dry weight for both hybrids and years, and was a good indicator for identifying the attainment of PM. This work represents an original contribution and a first step towards the development of a model for predicting PM in sunflower by using colorimetric measurements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguirrezábal LAN, Orioli GA, Hernández LF, Pereyra V, Miravé JP, 1996. Girasol. Aspectos fisiológicos que determinan el rendimiento. UNS. INTA, 127 pp.
PMid:22060941  
Anderson WK, 1975. Maturation of sunflower. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 15: 833-838.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA9750833 

CIE, 2001. Improvement to industrial colour difference evaluation. Central Bureau of the Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage, Viena. Publication CIE No. 142. 

Connor DJ, Hall AJ, 1997. Sunflower physiology. In: Sunflower technology and production (Schneiter AA, ed.). Agronomy Monograph 35. Am Soc of Agronomy, Madison, USA. pp: 113-182. 

Cukadar-Olmedo B, Miller JF, 1997. Inheritance of the stay green trait in sunflower. Crop Sci 37: 150-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010026x 

Cukadar-Olmedo B, Miller JF, Hammond JJ, 1997. Combining ability of the stay green trait and seed moisture content in sunflower. Crop Sci 37: 378-382.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700020012x 

De la Vega AJ, Hall AJ, 2002. Effects of planting date, genotype, and their interactions on sunflower yield: I. Determinants of oil-corrected grain yield. Crop Sci 42: 1191-1201.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1191 

Díaz Zorita M, Duarte GA, Plante E, 2003. El cultivo de girasol. ASAGIR, Buenos Aires. 10 pp. 

Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, González L, Tablada M, Robledo CW, 2008. InfoStat, vers. 2008, Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina. 

Elías SG, Copeland LO, 2001. Physiological and harvest maturity of canola in relation to seed quality. Agron J 93: 1054-1058.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351054x 

Fehr WR, Caviness CE, Burmood DT, Pennington JS, 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci 11: 929-931.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1971.0011183X001100060051x 

Gbikpi PJ, Crookston RK, 1981. Effect of flowering date on accumulation of dry matter and protein in soybean seeds. 1981. Crop Sci 21: 652–655.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100050003x 

Gesch RW, Johnson BL, 2012. Seed moisture at physiological maturity in oilseed and confectionary sunflower hybrids in the northern U.S. Field Crops Res 133: 1-9. 

Hanway JJ, 1963. Growth stages of corn (Zea mays L.). Agron J 55: 487-492.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1963.00021962005500050024x 

Hunter JL, TeKrony DM, Miles DF, Egli DB, 1991. Corn seed maturity indicators and their relationship to uptake of carbon-14 assimilate. Crop Sci 31: 1309-1313.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1991.0011183X003100050045x 

HunterLab, 2001. The basics of color perception and measurement. Available in http://www.hunterlab.com/pdf/color.pdf 

Kaya Y, Baltensperger D, Nelson L, Miller JF, 2004. The determining physiological maturity time in sunflower. Trakia Univ J Sci 5: 1-10. 

Merrien A, 1992. Physiologie du tournesol. CETIOM, Paris, 125 pp. 

Ploschuk EL, Hall AJ, 1995. Capitulum position in sunflower affects grain temperature and duration of grain filling. Field Crops Res 44: 111-117.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(95)00079-8 

Ritchie SW, Hanway JJ, Benson GO, 1992. How a corn plant develops (SP-48). Iowa State Univ. Available in http://maize.agron.iastate.edu/corntitle.html. 

Robinson RG, 1983. Maturation of sunflower and sector sampling of heads to monitor maturation. Field Crops Res 7: 31-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(83)90004-7 

Rondanini DP, Savin R, Hall AJ, 2007. Estimation of physiological maturity in sunflower as a function of achene water concentration. Eur J Agron 26: 295-309.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.11.001 

Sabry GE, Copeland LO, 2001. Physiological and harvest maturity of canola in relation to seed quality. Agron J 93: 1054-1058.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.9351054x 

Schneiter AA, Miller JF, 1981. Description of sunflower growth stages. Crop Sci 21:901-903.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1981.0011183X002100060024x 

Sexton T, Woolhouse HW, 1985. Senescence and abscission. In: Advanced plant physiology (Wilkins MB, ed.), Pitman Press, London, pp: 468-497. 

Shewfelt R, Thai C, Davis J, 1988. Prediction of changes in color of tomatoes during ripening at different constant temperatures. J Food Sci 53: 1433-1437.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb09293.x 

Siddiqui MQ, Brown JF, Allen SJ, 1975. Growth stages of sunflowers and intensity indices for white blister and rust. Plant Dis Rep 59: 7-11. 

Sinecker P, Gomes MSO, Areas JAG, Lanfer-Márquez UM, 2002. Relationship between color (instrumental and visual) and chlorophyll contents in soybean seeds during ripening. J Agric Food Chem 50: 3961-3966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf0113023 

Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy. A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys; 2nd edition. Agricultural Handbook 436; Nat Resour Conserv Serv, USDA, Washington DC, USA, 869 pp. 

Unger PW, Thompson TE, 1982. Planting date effects on sunflower head and seed development. Agron J 74: 389-395.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400020031x

Published
2013-04-17
How to Cite
Hernandez, L. F., & Larsen, A. O. (2013). Visual definition of physiological maturity in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) is associated with receptacle quantitative color parameters. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(2), 447-454. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3645
Section
Plant physiology