Nematode diversity in soil from a field trial with decomposing Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 protein

  • H. W. Karuri Embu University College, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 6-60100, Nairobi
  • R. L. Amata National Agricultural Research Laboratories, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O Box 14733-00800, Nairobi
  • N. O. Amugune School of Biological Sciences, University of Nairobi, P.O. Box 30197-00100, Nairobi
  • C. N. Waturu Horticultural Research Centre, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box 220, Thika
Keywords: Bacillus thuringiensis, biosafety, Helicoverpa armigera, nematodes

Abstract

The quality of decomposing plant materials may affect the soil community structure. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of decomposing Bt cotton and its isoline on soil nematode diversity. Bt cotton (06Z604D), isoline (99M03) and HART 89M (local non-Bt cotton cultivar) were planted for two seasons in a completely randomized block design in a confined field trial at Mwea, Kenya. After harvest the plant material was incorporated into soil and the nematode diversity was determined. The presence of Bt protein was evaluated using ELISA and insect bioassays. Abundance of bacteria feeding nematodes was significantly (p<0.05) high but to a smaller extent in the Bt cotton plots (53.7% and 52% in the first and second season respectively) than in isoline (42.8% and 45% in the first and second season respectively). Insect bioassays detected Bt protein in the Bt cotton plots during the entire decomposition period in both seasons. There were no significant differences in nematode trophic groups composition between isoline and HART 89M. The effect of Cry2Ab2 and Cry1Ac protein in decomposing Bt cotton litter on soil nematodes was minimal. The study provides a basis for future studies on the impact of genetically engineered plants on soil nematodes in Kenyan agroecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott WS, 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18: 265-267.

Bongers T, 1990. The maturity index -An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83: 14-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00324627

Briar SS, 2007. Nematodes as bioindicators of soil food web health in agroecosystems, a critical analysis. Doctoral thesis, Ohio State University.

Castaldini M, Turrini A, Sbrana C, Benedetti A, Marchionni M, Mocali S, Fabiani A, Landi S, Santomassimo F, Pietrangeli B, Nuti M P, Miclaus N, Giovannetti M, 2005. Impact of Bt corn on rhizospheric and soil eubacterial communities and on beneficial mycorrhizal symbiosis in experimental microcosms. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 6719-6729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.11.6719-6729.2005 PMid:16269702 PMCid:PMC1287690

Cortet J, Andersen MN, Caul S, Griffiths B, Joffre R, Lacroix B, Sausse C, Thompson J, Krogh PH, 2006. Decomposition processes under Bt Bacillus thuringiensis maize. Results of a multi-site experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 195-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.025

Coviella CE, Morgan DJW, Trumble JT, 2000. Interactions of elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization, effects on production of Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in transgenic plants. Environ Entomol 29: 781-787. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-29.4.781

Donegan KK, Seidler RJ, Fieland VJ, Schaller DL, Palm CJ, Ganio LM, Cardwell DM, Steinberger Y, 1997. Decomposition of genetically engineered tobacco under field conditions, persistence of the proteinase inhibitor I product and effects on soil microbial respiration and protozoa nematode and microarthropod populations. J Appl Ecol 34: 767-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2404921

Escher N, Käch B, Nentwig W, 2000. Decomposition of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis maize by microorganisms and woodlice Porcellio scaber Crustacea, Isopoda. Basic Appl Ecol 1: 161-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1078/1439-1791-00024

Ettema CH, Coleman DC, Vellidis G, Lowrance R, Rathbun S, 1998. Spatiotemporal distributions of bacterivorous nematodes and soil resources in a restored riparian wetland. Ecol 79: 2721- 2734. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2721:SDOBNA]2.0.CO;2

Ferris H, Matute M, 2003. Structural and functional succession in the nematode fauna of a soil food web. Appl Soil Ecol 23: 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00044-1

Ferris H, Bongers T, de Geode RG, 2001. A framework for soil food web diagnostics extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept. Appl Soil Ecol 18: 13-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1393(01)00152-4

Griffiths BS, Heckmann LH, Caul S, Thompson J, Scimgeour C, Krogh PH, 2007. Varietal effects of eight paired lines of transgenic Bt maize and near-isogenic non-Bt maize on soil microbial and nematode community structure. Plant Biotech J 5: 60-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7652.2006.00215.x PMid:17207257

Gujar GT, Kumari A, Kalia V, 2004. Host crop influence on the susceptibility of the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, to Bacillus thuringiensis ssp Kurstaki HD-73. Entomol Exp Appl 11: 165-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-8703.2004.00223.x

Gupta VS, Watson S, 2004. Ecological impacts of GM cotton on soil biodiversity, below-ground production of Bt by GM cotton and Bt cotton impacts on soil biological processes [pdf]. Australian Government Department of the Environment and Heritage CSIRO Land and Water. Available in: http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/biotechnology/publications/bt-cotton.html [16 Oct 2013].

Head G, Surber JB, Watson JA, Martin JW, Duan JJ, 2002. No detection of Cry1Ac protein in soil after multiple years of transgenic Bt cotton Bollgard use. Environ Entomol 31: 30-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-31.1.30

Honemann L, Zurbrugg C, Nentwiga W, 2008. Effects of Bt-corn decomposition on the composition of the soil meso- and macrofauna. Appl Soil Ecol 40: 203-209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.04.006

Icoz I, Stotzky G, 2008. Fate and effects of insect-resistant Bt crops in soil ecosystems. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 559-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.11.002

Ingham RE, Trofymow JA, Ingham ER, Coleman DC, 1985. Interactions of bacteria, fungi, and their nematode grazers, effects on nutrient cycling and plant growth. Ecol Monographs 55: 119-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1942528

Jenkins WR, 1964. A rapid centrifugal-floatation technique for separating nematodes from soil. Plant Dis Rep 48: 692-710.

Kimura M, Murase J, Lu YH, 2004. Carbon cycling in rice field ecosystems in the context of input decomposition and translocation of organic materials and the fates of their end products CO2 and CH4. Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1399-1416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.03.006

Kindt R, Coe R, 2005. Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, Kenya. 196 pp. PMCid:PMC1156951

Kotilainen T, Setala H, Alatalo Vuorisalo T, Saloniemi I, 2005. Impacts of chitinase-transformed silver birch on leaf decomposition and soil organisms. Eur J Soil Biol 40: 155-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2005.03.001

Lachnicht S, 2004. Winter decomposition of transgenic cotton residue in conventional-till and no-till systems. Appl Soil Ecol 27: 135-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.05.001

Masoero F, Moschinim M, Rossi F, Prandini A, Pietri A, 1999. Nutritive value mycotoxin contamination and in vitro rumen fermentation of normal and genetically modified corn Cry1Ab grown in northern Italy. Maydica 44: 205-209.

Mina U, Choudhary R, Aggarwal P, 2008. An approach for impact assessment of transgenic plants on soil ecosystem. Appl Ecol Environ Res 6: 1-19.

Motavalli PP, Kremer RJ, Fang M, Means NE, 2004. Impact of genetically modified crops and their management on soil microbially mediated plant nutrient transformations. J Environ Qual 33: 816-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/jeq2004.0816 PMid:15224915

Palm CJ, Donegan K, Siedler R, 1996. Persistence in soil of transgenic plant produced Bacillus thuringiensis var kurstaki. Can J Microbiol 42: 1258-262. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/m96-163

Ruess L, Ferris H, 2004. Decomposition pathways and successional changes. Nematol Monographs Perspectives 2: 547-556.

Saxena D, Stotzky G, 2001. Bt corn has a higher lignin content than non-Bt corn Am J Bot 88: 1704-1706. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3558416 PMid:21669705

Sims SR, Holden LR, 1996. Insect bioassay for determining soil degradation of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki CryIAb protein in corn tissues. Environ Entomol 25: 659-664.

Sims SR, Ream JE, 1997. Soil inactivation of the Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki Cry IIA insecticidal protein within transgenic cotton tissue, laboratory microcosm and field studies. J Agr Food Chem 45: 1502-1505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf960647w

Tóthmérész B, 1995. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J Veg Sci 6: 283-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3236223

Van den Brink PJ, Ter Braak, CF 1998. Multivariate analysis of stress in experimental ecosystems by principal response curves and similarity analysis. Aquat Ecol 32: 163-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009944004756

Vauramo S, Pasonen H, Pappinen A, Setala H, 2006. Decomposition of leaf litter from chitinase transgenic silver birch Betula pendula and effects on decomposer populations in a field trial. Appl Soil Ecol 32: 338-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.07.007

Yeates GW, Bongers T, de Goede RG, Freckman DW, Georgieva S, 1993. Feeding habits in soil nematode families and genera-an outline for soil ecologists. J Nematol 25: 315-331. PMid:19279775 PMCid:PMC2619405

Zwahlen C, Hilbeck A, Nentwig W, 2007. Field decomposition of transgenic Bt maize residue and the impact on non-target soil invertebrates. Plant Soil 300: 245-257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9410-6

Published
2013-10-18
How to Cite
Karuri, H. W., Amata, R. L., Amugune, N. O., & Waturu, C. N. (2013). Nematode diversity in soil from a field trial with decomposing Bt cotton expressing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab2 protein. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(4), 968-979. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013114-3731
Section
Agricultural environment and ecology