What comes first, origin or production method? An investigation into the relative importance of different attributes in the demand for eggs
Abstract
This paper analyses consumer preferences for different eggs attributes to assess the importance placed by consumers on the origin and method of production when shopping. The data comes from an experiment conducted in Spain during 2009. An Error Component Random Parameter Logit model is used to estimate the effect of different eggs characteristics on consumers’ utility and derive their willingness to pay. Results suggest that consumers positively value the free-range and organic method of production and the local and regional origin and that they are willing to pay an additional € 0.85 for each package of six free-range or organic eggs, € 0.77 for locally produced and € 0.27 for regional produced eggs. Hence, the least valued eggs for consumers are those produced in cages and outside the region. Relative to this product, the highest willingness to pay corresponds to free-range or organic eggs followed by locally produced eggs and finally, by the regional eggs. Thus, we can conclude that Spanish consumers give more importance when shopping for eggs to the method of production than to the origin of production.Downloads
References
Akaichi F, Gil JM, Nayga RM Jr, 2012. Assesing consumers' willigness to pay for different units of organic milk: Evidence from multi-unit auctions. Can J Agr Econ 60: 469-494.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2012.01254.x
Alfnes F, Rickertsen K, 2003. European consumers' willingness to pay for U.S. beef in experimental auction market. Am J Agr Econ 2: 396-405.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.t01-1-00128
Andersen LM, 2011. Animal welfare and eggs - Cheap talk or money on the counter? J Agr Econ 62(3): 565-584.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2011.00310.x
Barreiro-Hurlé J, Colombo S, Cantos-Villar E, 2008. Is there a market for functional wines? Consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay for resveratrol-enriched quality red-wine. Food Qual Prefer 19(4): 360-371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.11.004
Batte MT, Hooker NH, Haab T, Beaveson J, 2007. Putting their money where their mouths are: Consumer willingness to pay for multi-ingredient, processed organic food products. Food Policy 32(2): 145-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.05.003
Bernard JC, Bernard DJ, 2009. What is it about organic milk? An experimental analysis (2008-11). Am J Agr Econ 91(3): 826-836.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2009.01258.x
Bernard JC, Bernard DJ, 2010. Comparing parts with the whole: willingness to pay for pesticide-free, non-GM, and organic potatoes and sweet corn. J Agr Resour Econ 35(3): 457-475.
BOE, 2008. Royal decree 226/2008, of 15 February, por el que se regulan las condiciones de aplicación de la normativa comunitaria de comercialización de huevos. Boletín Oficial del Estado No. 56, 05/3/2008.
Bond CA, Thilmany D, Bond JK, 2008. Understanding consumer interest in product and process-based attributes for fresh produce. Agribusiness 24: 231-252.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20157
Bonnet C, Simioni M, 2001. Assessing consumer response to protected designation of origin labelling: A mixed multinomial logit approach. Eur Rev Agr Econ 28(4): 433-449.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.433
Burton M, Rigby D, Young T, James S, 2001. Consumer attitudes to genetically modified organisms in food in the UK. Eur Rev Agr Econ 28(4): 479-498.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.479
Campbell D, 2007. Willingness to pay for rural landscape improvements: Combining mixed logit and random effects models. J Agr Econ 58(3): 467-483.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2007.00117.x
Campbell BL, Lesschaeve I, Bowen AJ, Onufrey SR, Moskowitz H, 2010. Purchase drivers of Canadian consumers of local and organic produce. Hortscience 45(10): 1480-1488.
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2005. Consumer preferences for food product quality attributes from Swedish agriculture. Ambio 34: 366-370.
PMid:16092270
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2007a. Farm animal welfare-testing for market failure. J Agr Appl Econ 39(1): 61-73.
Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Lagerkvist CJ, 2007b. Consumer willingness to pay for farm animal welfare: Mobile abattoirs versus transportation to slaughter. Eur Rev Agr Econ 34(3): 321-344.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbm025
Carpio CE, Isengildina-Massa O, 2009. Consumers' willingness to pay for locally grown products: The case of South Carolina. Agribusiness 25(3): 412-426.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20210
Chilton SM, Burgess D, Hutchinson WG, 2006. The relative value of farm animal welfare. Ecol Econ 59: 353-363.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.003
Costanigro M, McFadden DT, Kroll S, Nurse G, 2011. An in-store valuation of local and organic apples: The role of social desirability. Agribusiness 27(4): 465-477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20281
Cummings, R.G. and L.O. Taylor. 1999. Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: a cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method. Am Econ Rev 89: 649–665.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649
Darby K, Batte MT, Ernst S, Roe B, 2008. Decomposing local: A conjoint analysis of locally produced foods. Am J Agr Econ 90(2): 476-486.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.01111.x
Didier T, Lucie S, 2008. Measuring consumer's willingness to pay for organic and fair trade products. Int J Consum Stud 32: 479-490.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00714.x
Ehmke M, Kusk JL, Tyner W, 2008. Measuring relative importance of preference for country of origin in China, France, Niger, and the United States. Agr Econ 38: 277-285.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2008.00299.x
Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, 2003. Quality labels as a marketing advantage. The case of the 'PDO Zagora' apples in the Greek market. Eur J Market 37(10): 1350-1374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560310487149
Giraud KL, Bond GA, Bond JJ, 2005. Consumer preferences for locally made speciality food products across Northern New England. Agr Resour Econ Rev 34(2): 204-216.
Goddard E, Boxall P, Emunu JP, Boyd C, Asselin A, Neall A, 2007. Consumer attitudes, willingness to pay and revealed preferences for different egg production attributes: analysis of Canadian egg consumers. Dept Rural Economy, Univ of Alberta, USA. Project Report #07-03.
Gracia A, Loureiro M.L, Nayga R.M, 2012. Are valuations from non-hypothetical choice experiments different from those of experimental auctions? Am J Agr Econ 93 (5): 1358-1373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar054
Grunert KG, 2006. How changes in consumer behaviour and retailing affect competence requirements for food producers and processors. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 6(11): 3-22.
Hess S, Rose J, 2009. Should reference alternatives in pivot design SC surveys be treated differently? Environ Resour Econ 42: 297-317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10640-008-9244-6
Hoffman R, 2000. Country of origin - A consumer perception perspective of fresh meat. Brit Food J 102(3): 211-229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700010332304
Hu W, Woods T, Bastin S, 2009. Consumer acceptance and willingness to pay for blueberry products with nonconventional attributes. J Agr Appl Econ 41(1): 47-60.
Hu W, Batte MT, Woods T, Ernst S, 2012. Consumer preferences for local production and other value-added label claims for a processed food product. Eur Rev Agr Econ 39(3): 489-510.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr039
INE, 2012. Revisión del Padrón Municipal 2011. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. Available at http://www.ine.es/jaxi/menu.do?type=pcaxis&file=pcaxis&path=%2Ft 20% 2Fe245%2Fp04%2F%2Fa2011 [1 June 2012].
Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ, 2010. Preferences for site and environmental functions when selecting forthcoming national parks. Ecol Econ 69(7): 1532-1544.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.013
James JS, Rickard BJ, Rossman WJ, 2009. Product differentiation and market segmentation in applesauce: using a choice experiment to assess the value of organic, local and nutrition attributes. Agr Resour Econ Rev 38(3): 357-370.
Kehlbacher A, Bennett R, Balcombe K, 2012. Measuring the consumer benefits of improving farm animal welfare to inform welfare labelling. Food Policy 37(6): 627-633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.07.002
Lagerkvist CJ, Carlsson F, Viske D, 2006. Swedish consumer preferences for animal welfare and biotech: A choice experiment. AgBioForum 9(1): 51-58.
Lancaster KJ, 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ 74(2): 132-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/259131
Liljenstolpe C, 2008. Valuing animal welfare with choice experiments: An application to Swedish pig production. Agribusiness 24: 67-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20147
Loureiro ML, Hine S, 2002. Discovering niche markets: A comparison of consumer willingness to pay for local (Colorado Grown), organic and GMO-free products. J Agr Appl Econ 34(3): 477-487.
Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ, 2003. Estimating consumer willingness to pay for country-of-origin labeling. J Agr Resour Econ 28(2): 287-301.
Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ, 2005. Assessing consumer preferences for country-of-origin labeling. J Agr Appl Econ 37(1): 49-63.
Loureiro ML, Umberger WJ, 2007. A choice experiment model for beef: What US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability. Food Policy 32(4): 496-514.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.11.006
Louviere JJ, Street D, 2000. Stated-preference methods. In: Handbook of transport modelling (Hensher DA, Button KJ, eds.). Pergamon Press, Amsterdam (Netherlands).
Lusk J, Rosen J, Fox J, 2003. Demand for beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn: a comparison of consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom and the United States. Am J Agr Econ 85: 16-29.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00100
MAGRAMA, 2012. Panel de consumo alimentario de Espa-a. Available at http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/alimentacion/temas/consumo-y-comercializacion-y-distribucion-alimentaria/panel-de-consumo-alimentario/. [Accessed 2/10/2012].
McFadden D, 1974. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior, frontiers in econometrics: Economic theory and mathematical economics social psychology, 252. Academic Press, NY.
PMCid:355621
MERCASA, 2011. Información por sector: huevos. La alimentación en España 2010. Madrid.
Mesías JF, Martínez-Carrasco F, Martínez-Paz JM, Gaspar García P, 2011a. Functional and organic eggs as an alternative to conventional production: A conjoint analysis of consumers' preferences. J Sci Food Agr 91: 532-538.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4217
PMid:21218489
Mesías JF, Martínez-Carrasco F, Martínez-Paz JM, Gaspar García P, 2011b. La disposición a pagar por alimentos ecológicos en Espa-a: Una aproximación a la existencia de diferencias regionales. ITEA 107(1): 3-20.
OJ, 2008. Commission Regulation No. 589/2008, of 23 June, laying down detailed rules for implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards marketing standards for eggs. Official Journal of the European Union L 163: 6-23, 24/6/2008.
Olesen I, Alfnes F, Røra MB, Kolstad K, 2010. Eliciting consumers' willingness to pay for organic and welfare-labelled salmon in a non-hypothetical choice experiment. Livest Sci 127(2-3): 218-226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.10.001
Olynk NJ, Tonsor GT, Wolf CA, 2010. Consumer willingness to pay for livestock credence attribute claim verification. J Agr Resour Econ 35(2): 261-280.
Pouta E, Heikkilä J, Forsman-Hugg S, Isoniemi M, Mäkelä J, 2010. Consumer choice of broiler meat: The effects of country of origin and production methods. Food Qual Prefer 21: 539-546.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.02.004
Resano H, Sanjuán AI, Albisu LM, 2010. Consumers' response to the EU quality policy allowing for heterogeneous preferences. Food Policy 37: 255-265.
Scarpa R, del Giudice T, 2004. Market segmentation via mixed logit: Extra-virgin olive oil in urban Italy. J Agr Food Indust Organiz 2(1): Paper 7.
Scarpa R, Philippidis G, Spalatro F, 2005. Product-country image and preference heterogeneity for mediterranean food products: A discrete choice framework. Agribusiness 21(3): 329-349.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.20051
Scarpa R, Thiene M., Marangon F, 2007a. The value of collective reputation for environmentally-friendly production methods: the case of Val di Gresta carrots. J Agr Food Indust Organiz 5(1): article 7.
Scarpa R, Campbell D, Hutchinson G, 2007b. Benefit estimates for landscape improvements: sequential Bayesian design and respondents rationality in a choice experiment. Land Econ 83(4): 617-634.
Scarpa R, Thiene M, Marangon F, 2008. Using exible taste distributions to value collective reputation for environmentally friendly production methods. Can J Agr Econ 56: 145-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7976.2008.00122.x
Schneider ML, Francis CA, 2005. Marketing locally produced foods: consumer and farmer opinions in Washington County, Nebraska. Renew Agr Food Syst 20(4): 252-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/RAF2005114
Stolz H, Stolz M, Zanoli R, 2010. Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for organicplus communication arguments. 119th EAAE Seminar 'Sustainability in the Food Sector: Rethinking the Relationship between the Agro-Food System and the Natural, Social, Economic and Institutional Enviornments', Capri, Italy, June 30th- July 2nd.
Street D, Burgess L, 2007. The construction of optimal stated choice experiments. John Wiley & Sons Inc., NJ.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470148563
Tonsor GT, Olynk N, Wolf Ch, 2009. Consumer preferences for animal welfare attributes: The case of gestation crates. J Agr Appl Econ 41(3): 713-730.
Train K, 1999. Halton sequences for mixed logit. ELSA Berkeley, CA, USA. Working Paper 08-99.
Train K, 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK. 334 pp.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753930
PMid:12648124
Tranter RB, Bennet RM, Costa L, Cowan C, Holt GC, Jones PJ, Miele M, Sottomayor M, Vestergaard J, 2009. Consumer's willingness to pay for organic conversion-grade food: Evidence from five EU countries. Food Policy 34: 287-294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2009.03.001
Ure-a F, Bernabéu R, Olmeda M, 2008. Women, men and organic food: Differences in their attitudes and willingness to pay. A Spanish case study. Int J Consum Stud 32: 18-26.
Van der Lans OA, Van Ittersum K, De Cicco A, Loseby M, 2001. The role of the region of origin and EU certificates of origin in consumer evaluation of food products. Eur Rev Agr Econ 28(4): 451-477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.451
Van Loo EL, Caputo V, Nayga RM, Meullenet JF, Ricke SC, 2011. Consumers' willingness to pay for organic chicken breast: Evidence from choice experiment. Food Qual Prefer 22(7): 603-613.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.003
Wolf CA, Tonsor GT, Olynk NJ, 2011. Understanding U.S. consumer demand for mild production attributes. J Agr Resour Econ 36(2): 326-342.
Yue C, Tong C, 2009. Organic or local? Investigating consumer preference for fresh produce using a choice experiment with real economic incentives. HortScience 44(2): 366-37.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
