Farm size and growth in field crop and dairy farms in France, Hungary and Slovenia
Abstract
The aim of this article is to investigate the relationship between size and farm growth. The existing theories of the association between size and farm growth give mixed results by countries and over time. This paper pursues a twofold objective: on one hand, to test the validity of Gibrat’s Law for French, Hungarian and Slovenian specialized dairy and crop farms during the pre- and post-accession period to the European Union membership. Dairy and crops farms are prevailing in the farming structure of these countries. Using Farm Accountancy Data Network datasets makes it necessary to avoid biases due to heterogeneous structures across the farming systems. Thus we use quantile regressions to control for farm size related heterogeneity in the samples. On the other hand, the main novelty of this paper is the comparative analysis of the relationship between farm size and farm growth between transition Hungarian and Slovenian and non-transition French farming sectors, characterized by rather different farm structures. The results reject the validity of Gibrat’s Law for crop farms in Hungary and to a lesser extent in France, and for French and Slovenian dairy farms. We provide evidence that smaller farms grew faster than larger ones over the studied period 2001-2007 for France, 2001-2008 for Hungary, and 2004-2008 for Slovenia. Conversely, the results for Slovenia suggest that the rate of growth of crop farms in terms of its land is independent from its size.Downloads
References
Aubert M, Perrier-Cornet P, 2009. Is there a future for small farms in developed countries? Evidence from the French case. Agr Econ (40 Suppl): 797–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2009.00416.x
Bakucs LZ, Fertő I, 2009. Growth of family farms in a transition country – The Hungarian case. Agr Econ (40 Suppl): 787–793.
Bernués A, Herrero M, 2008. Farm intensification and drivers of technology adoption in mixed dairy-crop systems in Santa Cruz, Bolivia. Span J Agric Res 6(2): 279–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008062-319
Bojnec Š, Latruffe L, 2013. Farm size, agricultural subsidies and farm performance in Slovenia. Land Use Policy 32: 207–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.09.016
Choisis JP, Thévenet C, Gibon A, 2012. Analyzing farming systems diversity: a case study in south-western France. Span J Agric Res 10(3): 605–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-533-11
Csaki C, Lerman Z, 2000. Structural change in the farming sectors in Central and Eastern Europe. World Bank Technical Paper No. 465, World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Duffy M, 2009. Economies of size in production agriculture. J Hunger Environ Nutr 4(3-4): 375–392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19320240903321292 PMid:23144676 PMCid:PMC3489134
Fertő I, Bakucs LZ, 2009. Gibrat's Law revisited in a transition economy: the Hungarian case. Empir Econ Lett 8(3): 13–18.
Garcia P, Offutt S, Sonka S, 1987. Size distribution and growth in a sample of Illinois cash grain farms. Am J Agr Econ 69(2): 471–476. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1242310
Gardebroek C, Turi KN, Wijnands JHM, 2010. Growth dynamics of dairy processing firms in the European Union. Agr Econ 41(3-4): 285–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00447.x
Gibrat R, 1931. Les inégalités economiques. Librairie du Recueil Sirey, Paris.
Goddard J, Wilson J, Blandon P, 2002. Panel tests of Gibrat's Law for Japanese manufacturing. Int J Ind Org 20(4): 415–433. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(00)00085-0
Goddard J, McMillan D, Wilson JOS, 2006. Do firm sizes and profit rates converge? Evidence on Gibrat's Law and the persistence of profits in the long run. Appl Econ 38(3): 267–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00036840500367955
Hallam A, 1993. Empirical studies of size, structure and efficiency in agriculture. In: Size, structure and the changing face of American agriculture (Hallam A, ed.). West-view Press, Boulder, pp: 204–231.
Harris R, Trainor M, 2005. Plant-level analysis using the ARD: another look at Gibrat's Law. Scot J Polit Econ 52(3): 492–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0036-9292.2005.00353.x
Heckman JJ, 1979. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1): 153–161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352
Kostov P, Patton M, Mcerlean S, Moss J, 2005. Does Gibrat's Law hold amongst dairy farmers in Northern Ireland? 11th EAAE Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 24-27 August. Available in http://purl.umn.edu/24775
Lambarra F, Serra T, Gil JM, 2007. Technical efficiency analysis and decomposition of productivity growth of Spanish olive farms. Span J Agric Res 5(3): 259–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2007053-247
Latruffe L, Fogarasi J, Desjeux Y, 2012. Efficiency, productivity and technology comparison for farms in Central and Western Europe: The case of field crop and dairy farming in Hungary and France. Econ Syst 36(2): 264–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.07.002
Lotti F, Santarelli E, Vivarelli M, 2003. Does Gibrat's Law hold among young, small firms? J Evol Econ 13(3): 213–235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00191-003-0153-0
Moreno-Pérez OM, Ortiz-Miranda D, 2008. Understanding structural adjustment in Spanish arable crop farms: policies, technology and multifunctionality. Span J Agric Res 6(2): 153–165. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008062-307
Pardos L, Maza MT, Fantova E, Sepúlveda W, 2008. The diversity of sheep production systems in Aragón (Spain): characterisation and typification of meat sheep farms. Span J Agric Res 6(4): 497–507. http://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2008064-344
Piergiovanni R, 2010. Gibrat's Law in the "Third Italy": firm growth in the Veneto region. Growth Change 41(1): 28–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2009.00505.x
Piet L, Latruffe L, Le Mouël C, Desjeux Y, 2012. How do agricultural policies influence farm size inequality? The example of France. Eur Rev Agr Econ 39(1): 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbr035
Rizov M, Mathijs E, 2003. Farm survival and growth in transition economies: theory and empirical evidence from Hungary. Post-Communist Economies 15(2): 227–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14631370308093
Serra T, Goodwin B, Featherstone AM, 2005. Agricultural policy reform and off-farm labour decisions. J Agr Econ 56(2): 271–285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2005.00004.x
Shapiro D, Bollman RD, Ehrensaft P, 1987. Farm size and growth in Canada. Am J Agr Econ 69(2): 477–483. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1242311
Sumner A, Wolf C, 2002. Diversification, vertical integration, and the regional pattern of dairy farm size. Rev Agr Econ 24(2): 442–457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9353.00030
Swinnen JFM, Buckwell A, Mathijs E, 1997. Agricultural privatization, land reform and farm restructuring in Central and Eastern Europe. Ashgate, Aldershot. PMCid:PMC24248
Swinnen JFM, Vranken L, 2009. Land and EU accession: review of the transitional restrictions by new member states on the acquisition of agricultural real estate. Centre for European Policy Studies, Brussels.
Upton M, Haworth S, 1987. The growth of farms. Eur Rev Agr Econ 14(4): 351–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/14.4.351
Wagner J, 1992. Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance: testing GIBRAT's law with establishment data from Lower Saxony, 1978–1989. Small Busin Econ 4(2): 125–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00389853
Ward AM, McKillop DG, 2005. The law of proportionate effect: the growth of the UK credit union movement at national and regional level. J Bus Financ Account 32(9-10): 1827–1859. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00649.x
Weiss CR, 1998. Size, growth, and survival in the Upper Austrian farm sector. Small Busin Econ 10(4): 305–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007972518380
Weiss CR, 1999. Farm growth and survival: econometric evidence for individual farms in Upper Austria. Am J Agr Econ 81(1): 103–116. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244454
Wolf CA, Sumner DA, 2001. Are farm size distributions bimodal? Evidence from kernel density estimates of dairy farm size distributions. Am J Agr Econ 83(1): 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00138
Zimmermann A, Heckelei T, Pérez I, 2006. Literature review of approaches to estimate structural change. SEAMLESS: System for environmental and agricultural modelling; linking European science and society. University of Bonn, Germany.
Zimmermann A, Heckelei T, Pérez DI, 2009. Modelling farm structural change for integrated ex-ante assessment: review of methods and determinants. Environ Sci Policy 12(5): 601–618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2009.01.014
Zimmermann A, Heckelei T, 2012. Structural change of European dairy farms – A cross-regional analysis. J Agr Econ 63(3): 576–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00355.x
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.
