Response of vetch, lentil, chickpea and red pea to pre- or post-emergence applied herbicides
Abstract
Broad-leaved weeds constitute a serious problem in the production of winter legumes, but few selective herbicides controlling these weeds have been registered in Europe. Four field experiments were conducted in 2009/10 and repeated in 2010/11 in Greece to study the response of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and red pea (Lathyrus cicera L.) to several rates of the herbicides pendimethalin, S-metolachlor, S-metolachlor plus terbuthylazine and flumioxazin applied pre-emergence, as well as imazamox applied post-emergence. Phytotoxicity, crop height, total weight and seed yield were evaluated during the experiments. The results of this study suggest that common vetch, lentil, chickpea and red pea differed in their responses to the herbicides tested. Pendimethalin at 1.30 kg ha-1, S-metolachlor at 0.96 kg ha-1 and flumioxazine at 0.11 kg ha-1 used as pre-emergence applied herbicides provided the least phytotoxicity to legumes. Pendimethalin at 1.98 kg ha-1 and both rates of S-metolachlor plus terbuthylazine provided the greatest common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.) control. Imazamox at 0.03 to 0.04 kg ha-1 could also be used as early post-emergence applied herbicide in common vetch and red pea without any significant detrimental effect.Downloads
References
Bukun B, Nissen SJ, Shaner DL, Vassios JD, 2012. Imazamox absorption, translocation, and metabolism in red lentil and dry bean. Weed Sci 60: 350-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00182.1
Chomas AJ, Kells JJ, 2004. Atrazine-resistant common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn with preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 18: 551-554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-03-077R
Fedoruk LK, Johnson EN, Shirtliffe SJ, 2011. The critical period of weed control for lentil in western Canada. Weed Sci 59: 517-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00051.1
Fraser J, Moyer JR, Topinka AK, McCartney D, 2003. Tolerance of annual forage legumes to herbicides in Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 83: 649-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P02-108
Fraser J, McCartney D, Najda H, Mir Z, 2004. Yield potential and forage quality of annual forage legumes in southern Alberta and northeast Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Sci 84: 143-155. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P02-100
Friesen GH, Wall DA, 1986. Tolerance of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) to herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 66: 131-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps86-017
García-Garijo A, Palma F, Iribarne C, Lluch C, Tejera NA, 2012. Alterations induced by imazamox on acetohydroxyacid synthase activity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) depend on leaf position. Pestic Biochem Phys 104: 72-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2012.07.004
Kantar F, Elkoca E, Zengin H, 1999. Chemical and agronomical weed control in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L. cv. Aziziye-94). Turk J Agric For 23: 631-635.
Malik N, Waddington J, 1989. Weed control strategies for forage legumes. Weed Technol 3: 288-296.
Monaco TJ, Weller SC, Ashton FM, 2002. Weed science. Principles and practices. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 671 pp.
MSTAT-C, 1988. A microcomputer program for the design, management, and analysis of agronomic research experiments. Crop & Soil Sci Dept, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. 152 pp.
Senseman SA (ed), 2007. Herbicide handbook, 9th ed. Weed Science Society of America, Lawrence, KS, USA. 458 pp.
Soltani N, Shropshire C, Sikkema PH, 2005. Tolerance of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to bentazon alone and when mixed with imazamox. Can J Plant Sci 85: 529-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/P04-064
Soltani N, Van Eerd LL, Vyn RJ, Shropshire C, Sikkema PH, 2007. Weed control, environmental impact and profitability of reduced rates of imazethapyr in combination with dimethenamid in dry beans. Can J Plant Sci 87: 671-678. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJPS06014
Steele GL, Chandler JM, McCauley GN, 2002. Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (O. sativa). Weed Technol 16: 627-630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0627:CORROS]2.0.CO;2
Stidham MA, Singh BK, 1991. Imidazolinone-acetohydroxyacid synthase interactions. In: The imidazolinone herbicides (Shaner DL, O'Conner SL, eds). CRC, Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp: 71-90.
Taran B, Warkentin TD, Vandenberg A, Holm FA, 2010. Variation in chickpea germplasm for tolerance to imazethepyr and imazamox herbicides. Can J Plant Sci 90: 139-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJPS09061
Taylor-Lovell S, Wax LM, Nelson R, 2001. Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol 15: 95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2001)015[0095:PRAYOS]2.0.CO;2
Wall DA, 1996. Lentil (Lens culinaris) and fababean (Vicia faba) tolerance to post-emergence applications of imazethapyr. Can J Plant Sci 76: 525-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjps96-096
Wilson DE, Nissen SJ, Thompson A, 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol 16: 567-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0567:PSTVAW]2.0.CO;2
Wilson RG, Miller SD, 1991. Dry edible bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) response to imazethapyr. Weed Technol 5: 22-26.
Wilson RG, Burgener PA, 2009. Evaluation of glyphosate-tolerant and conventional alfalfa weed control systems during the first year of establishment. Weed Technol 23: 257-263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/WT-08-082.1
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.