Simulation of farmer decision on land use conversions using decision tree method in Jiangsu Province, China
Abstract
Understanding farmer decisions on land use conversions (LUC) in rural areas has significant importance to understand and predict the patterns of land use changes in China. Many methods have been developed to search for the influencing factors on land use changes at farm household level. However, these methods have difficulty in evaluating the intertwined influences between factors and achieving farmer decision rules on LUC. Taking three regions located in Jiangsu Province as the study areas, the present work proposed a data mining method, classification and regression tree (CART), to simulate farmer decisions on LUC at farm household level. The accuracy of the simulated LUC by CART was above 85.00%, indicating that the proposed method could be used to simulate farmer decisions. The simulation results also showed that farmer decision rules on LUC presented regional characteristics. In Jiangsu Province, 20 rules were inferred for LUC using 10 factors which were related to the household resources, land market, and so on. These factors were ranked in the decreased importance on LUC as labor transfer, land market, location, resources of household, and characteristics of household. In Rudong County, the which were related factors with LUC included land market, labor transfer, and household resource, while in Changshu County, the additional factor of location was involved.Downloads
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the print and online versions of this journal are the property of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the licence. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 licence must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the final version of the work produced by the publisher, is not allowed.