Analysis of fruit and oil quantity and quality distribution in high-density olive trees in order to improve the mechanical harvesting process

  • Francisco J. Castillo-Ruiz University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-1847
  • Francisco Jiménez-Jiménez University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba
  • Gregorio L. Blanco-Roldán University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba
  • Rafael R. Sola-Guirado University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba
  • Juan Agüera-Vega University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba
  • Sergio Castro-Garcia University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba
Keywords: Olea europaea L., canopy shaker, straddle harvester, trunk shaker, tree training

Abstract

Olive fruit production and oil quality distribution with respect to canopy distribution are important criteria for selection and improvement of mechanical harvesting methods. Tests were performed in a high-density olive orchard (Olea europea L., cv. Arbequina) in southern Spain. Fruit distribution, fruit properties and oil parameters were measured by taken separate samples for each canopy location and tree. Results showed a high percentage of fruits and oil located in the middle-outer and upper canopy, representing more than 60% of total production. The position of these fruits along with their higher weight per fruit, maturity index and polyphenol content make them the target for all mechanical harvesting systems. The fruits from the lower canopy represented close to 30% of fruit and oil production, however, the mechanical harvesting of these fruits is inefficient for mechanical harvesting systems. Whether these fruits cannot be properly harvested, enhance tree training to raise their position is recommended. Fruits located inside the canopy are not a target location for mechanical harvesting systems as they were a small percentage of the total fruit (<10%). Significant differences were found for polyphenol content with respect to canopy height, although this was not the case with acidity. In addition, the ripening index did not influence polyphenol content and acidity values within the canopy. Fruit production, properties and oil quality varied depending on fruit canopy position. Thus harvesting systems may be targeted at maximize harvesting efficiency including an adequate tree training system adapted to the harvesting system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Francisco J. Castillo-Ruiz, University of Cordoba, Dept. Rural Engineering. Campus de Rabanales, Ctra. Nacional IV, km 396, Córdoba

Dpto. Ingeniería Rural
Área de Ingeniería Agroforestal

Profesor Contratado Doctor

References

Acebedo MM, Cañete ML, Cuevas J, 2000. Processes affecting fruit distribution and its quality in the canopy of olive trees. Adv Hort Sci 14: 169-175.

AEMO, 2010. Aproximación a los costes del cultivo del olivo. Asociación Española de Municipios del Olivo. Spain. Available in http://www.aemo.es/get.php?pathext=descargas/Costes_AEMO.pdf [6 May 2012].

Ayton J, Mailer RJ, Haigh A, Tronson D, Conlan D, 2007. Quality and oxidative stability of Australian olive oil according to harvest date and irrigation. J Food Lipids 14: 138-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4522.2007.00076.x

Barranco D, Fernández-Escobar R, Rallo L, 2010. Olive growing. Mundi-Prensa, Junta de Andalucía, Australian Olive Association Ltd., Pendle Hill NSW, Australia. 756 pp.

Castillo-Llanque F, Rapoport HF, 2011. Relationship between reproductive behavior and new shoot development in 5-year-old branches of olive trees. Trees-Struct Funct 25: 823-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-011-0558-6

Castro-Garcia S, Gil-Ribes JA, Blanco-Roldan GL, Aguera-Vega JA, 2007. Mode shapes evaluation of trunk shakers used in oil olive harvesting. T ASABE 50(3): 727-732. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.23127

Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Roldan GL, Gil-Ribes JA, Agüera-Vega J, 2008. Dynamic analysis of olive trees in intensive orchards under forced vibration. Trees-Struct Funct 22(6): 795-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0240-9

Cicek G, Sumer SK, Kocabiyik H, 2010. Effect of different harvest methods on olive yield and work capacity. Afr J Agric Res 5(23): 3246-3250.

Connor DJ, 2006. Towards optimal designs for hedgerow olive orchards. Aust J Agric Res 57: 1067-1072. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR05448

Connor DJ, Centeno A, Gómez-del-Campo M, 2009. Yield determination in olive hedgerow orchards. II. Analysis of radiation and fruiting profiles. Crop Pasture Sci 60(5): 443-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP08253

De la Rosa R, Guerrero N, Rallo L, Barranco D, León L, 2007. Preliminary results of an olive cultivar trial at high density. Aust J Agr Res 58: 392-395. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/AR06265

Dias AB, Peça JO, Pinheiro A, 2012. Long-term evaluation of the influence of mechanical pruning on olive growing. Agron J 104(1): 22-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0137

Du X, Chen D, Zhang Q, Scharf PA, Whiting MD, 2012. Dynamic responses of sweet cherry trees under vibratory excitations. Biosyst Eng 111(3): 305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.12.009

ESYRCE, 2013. Encuesta sobre superficies y rendimiento de cultivo. Análisis de las plantaciones de olivar en España, 2012 [Survey on olive crop yield and area, 2012]. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Spanish government. Available at http://www.magrama.gob.es/es/estadistica/temas/estadisticas-agrarias/Olivar2012_tcm7-262578.pdf [29 January 2015].

Farinelli D, Ruffolo M, Boco M, Tombesi A, 2012a. Yield efficiency and mechanical harvesting with trunk shaker of some international olive cultivars. Acta Hort 949: 379-384.

Farinelli D, Tombesi S, Famiani F, Tombesi A, 2012b. The fruit detachment force/fruit weight ratio can be used to predict the harvesting yield and the efficiency of trunk shakers on mechanical olive harvesting. Acta Hort 965: 61-64.

Ferguson L, 2006. Trends in olive fruit handling previous to its industrial transformation. Grasas Aceites 57(1): 9-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/gya.2006.v57.i1.17

Ferguson L, Rosa UA, Castro-Garcia S, Lee SM, Guinard JX, Burns J, Krueger WH, O`Connell NV, Glozer K, 2010. Mechanical harvesting of California table and oil olives. Adv Hort Sci 24(1): 53-63.

Ferguson L, Castro-Garcia S, 2014. Transformation of an ancient crop: preparing California 'Manzanillo' table olives for mechanical harvesting. HortTechnology 24(3): 270-273.

García JM, Seller S, Pérez-Camino MC, 1996. Influence of fruit ripening on olive oil quality. J Agric Food Chem 44: 3516-3520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf950585u

Gil-Ribes JA, Ferguson L, Castro-Garcia S, Blanco-Rodán, GL, 2014. How agricultural engineers develop mechanical harvesters: The university perspective. HortTechnology 24(3): 270-273.

Gómez-del-Campo M, Centeno A, Connor DJ, 2009. Yield determination in olive hedgerow orchards. I. Yield and profiles of yield components in north–south and east–west oriented hedgerows. Crop Pasture Sci 60(5): 434-442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/CP08252

Gómez-del-Campo M, García JM, 2012. Canopy fruit location can affect olive oil quality in 'Arbequina' hedgerow orchards. J Am Oil Chem Soc 89: 123–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11746-011-1900-2

Gutiérrez F, Jimenez B, Ruiz A, Albi MA, 1999. Effect of olive ripeness on the oxidative stability of virgin olive oil extracted from the varieties Picual and Hojiblanca and on the different components involved. J Agric Food Chem 47: 121-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf980684i

Kouraba K, Gil-Ribes JA, Blanco-Roldan GL, Jaime-Revuelta MA, Barranco-Navero D, 2004. Suitability of olive varieties for mechanical shaker harvesting. Olivae 101: 38-43.

Metzidakis I, Martinez-Vilela A, Castro Nieto G, Basso B, 2008. Intensive olive orchards on sloping land: Good water and pest management are essential. J Environ Manage 89(2): 120-128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.04.028

OJ, 1991. Commission Regulation EC 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis. 11 July 1991 [OJ_L_1991_248].

Ortega-García F, Blanco S, Peinado MA, Peragón J, 2008. Polyphenol oxidase and its relationship with oleuropein concentration in fruit and leaves of olive (Olea europaea) cv 'Picual' trees during fruit ripening. Tree Physiol 28(1): 45-54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/treephys/28.1.45

Ortega Nieto JM, 1969. La poda del olivo: Fundamentos y técnica. Prácticas regionales y su corrección. Ministerio de Agricultura. Dirección General de Agricultura, Madrid, Spain. 75 pp.

Pastor Muñoz-Cobo M, Humanes Guillén J, 2010. Poda del olivo: moderna olivicultura, 6th ed, Agrícola español, Madrid. 378 pp.

Proietti P, Nasini L, Famiani F, 2006. Effect of different leaf-to-fruit ratios on photosynthesis and fruit growth in olive (Olea europaea L.). Photosynthetica 44: 275-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11099-006-0019-4

Rallo L, Barranco D, Castro-Garcia S, Connor DJ, Gómez-del-Campo M, Rallo P, 2013. High-density olive plantations. Hortic Rev 41: 303-384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118707418.ch07

Ravetti L, Robb S, 2010. Continuous mechanical harvesting in modern Australian olive growing systems. Adv Hort Sci 24(1): 71-77.

Tombesi A, Boco M, Pilli M, Farinelli D, 2002. Influence of canopy density on efficiency of trunk shaker on olive mechanical harvesting. Acta Hort 586: 291-294.

Tous J, Lloveras J, Romero A, 1995. Effect of ethephon spray treatments on mechanical harvesting and oil composition of 'Arbequina' olives. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 120(4): 558-561.

Tous J, Romero A, Plana J, Hermoso JF, 2007. Olive oil cultivars suitable for very-high density planting conditions. Acta Hort 791: 403-408.

Tous J, Romero A, Hermoso JF, 2010. New trends in olive orchard design for continuous mechanical harvesting. Adv Hort Sci 24: 43-52.

Tovar MJ, Romero MP, Girona J, Motilva MJ, 2002. L-Phenylananine ammonia-lyase activity and concentration of phenolics in developing olive (Olea europaea L cv Arbequina) fruit grown under different irrigation regimes. J Sci Food Agric 82(8): 892-898. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1122

Uceda M, Frías L, 1975. Harvest dates. Evolution of the fruit oil content, oil composition and oil quality. Proc II Seminario Oleicola Internacional, Córdoba (Spain), oct 6-17. pp. 125–128.

Uceda M, Hermoso M, 1998. La calidad del aceite de oliva. In: El cultivo del olivo (Barranco D, Fernández-Escobar R, Rallo L, eds.). Mundi-prensa, Madrid (Spain), pp: 699-728.

Vieri M, Sarri D, 2010. Criteria for introducing mechanical harvesting of oil olives: results of a five-year project in Central Italy. Adv Hort Sci 24(1): 78-90.

Vossen O, 2007. Olive oil: history, production, and characteristics of the world's classic oils. Hortscience 42(5): 1093-1100.

Whitney JD, Wheaton TA, 1984. Tree spacing affects citrus fruit distribution and yield. Proc Fla State Hort Soc 97: 44-47.

Wiesman Z, 2009. Olive-harvesting biotechnologies. In: Desert olive oil cultivation (Wiesman, Z, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego (USA), pp: 185-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374257-5.00008-7

Yousfi K, Cert RM, García JM, 2006. Changes in quality and phenolic compounds of virgin olive oils during objectively described fruit maturation. Eur Food Res Technol 223: 117-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00217-005-0160-5

Published
2015-05-29
How to Cite
Castillo-Ruiz, F. J., Jiménez-Jiménez, F., Blanco-Roldán, G. L., Sola-Guirado, R. R., Agüera-Vega, J., & Castro-Garcia, S. (2015). Analysis of fruit and oil quantity and quality distribution in high-density olive trees in order to improve the mechanical harvesting process. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 13(2), e0209. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015132-6513
Section
Agricultural engineering