The impact assessment of the EU pre-accession funds on agriculture and food companies: The Croatian case
Abstract
Aim of study: This paper evaluates the effect of pre-accession EU grants on beneficiaries in the agri-food sector using a quasi-experimental approach on the case of Croatia. An insight into the available literature reveals a lack of rigorous research and evaluation of the results of using these funds in Croatia as well as in other beneficiary countries.
Area of study: Republic of Croatia, Europe (2006–2017).
Material and methods: Two datasets were used: (1) financial and structural data on the population of Croatian enterprises for the 2003–2017 period, and (2) data on SAPARD and IPARD grants in the 2007–2016 period. Data were analyzed using counterfactual impact analysis, i.e., a combination of difference-in-difference approach and propensity score matching.
Main results: The grants showed to have a positive effect on firm survival, as well as positive effects on obtaining bank loans and increasing turnover, value added, employment, and total factor productivity. Heterogeneous treatment effects show that the grants resulted in the greatest additionality for micro-sized firms located in Central Croatia. Cost-benefit analysis estimates an increase in the value added, which outweighs scheme-induced costs by 120% in the short run and 90% in the mid run.
Research highlights: Pre-accession programs in Croatia had a positive impact on the beneficiaries’ growth and business performance indicators in both short and mid term. This paper also promotes the application of similar research in other EU candidate countries where the same or similar funds are implemented.
Downloads
References
Abadie A, Imbens GW, 2008. On the failure of the bootstrap for matching estimators. Econometrica 76 (6): 1537-1557. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6474
Altman EI, 2013. Predicting financial distress of companies: Revisiting the Z-score and Zeta models. In: Handbook of research methods and applications in empirical finance; Bell AR, Brooks C, Prokopczuk M (eds). pp: 428-456. Edward Elgar Publ, Glos, UK. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857936097.00027
Bartova L, Hornakova J, 2016. farm investment support in the Slovak Republic. Proc 25th Int Sci Conf "Agrarian Perspectives XXV-Global and European Challenges For Food Production, Agribusiness and the Rural Economy", pp: 34-40. Prague, Czech Republic.
Becker SO, Ichino A, 2002. Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata J 2 (4): 358-377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0200200403
Bezhani E, 2015. The result and the impact of project IPARD for the rural and agricultural development. Mediterr J Soc Sci 6 (2): 602-604. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n2s1p602
Božanić K, 2018. Impact assessment of EU funds on company's performance in the fish processing industry: The case of Croatia. Croat J Fish 76: 145-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/cjf-2018-0018
Brambilla I, Lederman D, Porto G, 2012. Exports, export destinations, and skills. Am Econ Rev 102 (7): 3406-3438. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3406
Bryla P, 2005. The impact of SAPARD on the behaviour of farms and food-processing enterprises in the Lodz Region. Proc 94th EAAE Sem "From households to firms with independent legal status: the spectrum of institutional units in the development of European agriculture", Ashford, UK.
Caliendo M, Kopeinig S, 2008. Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22 (1): 31-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
Costa S, Pappalardo C, Vicarelli C, 2017. Internationalization choices and Italian firm performance during the crisis. Small Bus Econ 48 (3): 753-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9799-5
Czarnitzki D, Lopes-Bento C, 2013. Value for money? New microeconometric evidence on public R&D grants in Flanders. Res Policy 42 (1): 76-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.008
Dantler M, Kirchweger S, Eder M, Kantelhardt J, 2010. Analyse der Investitionsförderung für landwirtschaftliche Betriebe in Österreich. [Analysis of investment support for agricultural businesses in Austria.] Univ Nat Resour Life Sci, Inst Agr Forest Econ, Vienna, Austria.
Dvouletý O, Blažkova I, 2019. Assessing the microeconomic effects of public subsidies on the performance of firms in the Czech food processing industry: A counterfactual impact evaluation. Agribusiness 35 (3): 394-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21582
Dvouletý O, Srhoj S, Pantea S, 2021. Public SME grants and firm performance in European Union: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Small Bus Econ. 57: 243-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00306-x
Esposti R, Sotte F, 2013. Evaluating the effectiveness of agricultural and rural policies: an introduction. Eur Rev Agr Econ 40 (4): 535-539. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbt014
Garcia-Alvarez-Coque JM, Mas-Verdu F, Sanchez Garcia M, 2015. Determinants of agri-food firms' participation in public funded research and development. Agribusiness 31 (3): 314-329. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21407
Georgievski D, Grgic I, 2013. Economic results in the apple production with IPARD program fund use. Proc 41st Int Symp "Actual tasks on agricultural engineering", pp: 413-420. Opatija, Croatia.
Hapenciuca CV, Stanciu P, Morosan AA, Arionesei G, 2014. The economic impact of the SAPARD programme on the tourism supply in Suceava County. Amfiteatru Econ 16 (8): 1327-1339.
Hlavsa T, Hruška M, Turková E, 2017. The impact of investment support from the Rural Development Programme of the Czech Republic for 2007-2013 on the economic efficiency of farms. Stud Agr Econ 119 (1): 11-17. https://doi.org/10.7896/j.1014
Juračak J, Vukalović D, 2013. Recent trends in the Croatian agricultural business sector. APSTRACT: Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce 7 (2-3): 109-113. https://doi.org/10.19041/APSTRACT/2013/2-3/18
Kirchweger S, Kantelhardt J, Leisch F, 2015. Impacts of the government-supported investments on the economic farm performance in Austria. Agr Econ 61 (8): 343-355. https://doi.org/10.17221/250/2014-AGRICECON
Kline P, Moretti E, 2014. Local economic development, agglomeration economies, and the big push: 100 years of evidence from the Tennessee Valley Authority. Quart J Econ 129 (1): 275-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjt034
KPMG Croatia, 2017. Ex post evaluacija IPARD programa Republike Hrvatske 2007-2013. [Ex post evaluation of IPARD program for Republic of Croatia 2007-2013.] Zagreb, Croatia. https://ruralnirazvoj.hr/files/documents/EX-POST-EVALUACIJA-IPARD-PROGRAMA-RH-2007-2013..pdf
Kukoč M, Škrinjarić B, Juračak J, 2019. Usporedba poslovnih pokazatelja korisnika SAPARD-a i IPARD-a prije i nakon korištenja potpora. [The comparison of business indicators of SAPARD and IPARD beneficiaries before and after the use of grants.] Agroeconomia Croatica 9 (1): 23-35.
Läpple D, Hennessy T, 2015. Assessing the impact of financial incentives in extension programmes: evidence from Ireland. J Agr Econ 66 (3): 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12108
McKenzie D, 2017. Identifying and spurring high-growth entrepreneurship: Experimental evidence from a business plan competition. Am Econ Rev 107 (8): 2278-2307. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151404
Mezera J, Špička J, 2013. Economic effects of investment support of adding value to food products. Agris - On line Papers in Economics and Informatics 5 (1): 39-49.
Michalek J, 2012. Counterfactual impact evaluation of EU rural development programmes - Propensity score matching methodology applied to selected EU Member States, Vol 1: A micro-level approach. Publ Office of the EU, Luxembourg.
Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Croatia, 2011. Ex post evaluacija SAPARD programa u RH 2006-2009. [Ex post evaluation of SAPARD program in Croatia for 2006-2009]. Zagreb, Croatia.
Naglova Z, 2018. Investment subsidies in the meat industry and their impact on business economics. Centr Eur Bus Rev 7 (1): 37-45. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.194
Nilsson P, 2017. Productivity effects of CAP investment support: Evidence from Sweden using matched panel data. Land Use Policy 66: 172-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.043
Official Gazette of the Republic of Croatia, 2001. Zakon o poljoprivredi. [Agrucultural Law.] Zagreb: Narodne novine, Zagreb, Croatia. https://narodne-novine.nn.hr/clanci/sluzbeni/2001_07_66_1083.html
Pagliarino E, Cariola M, Pavone S, Manello A, 2014. The impact of Rural Development Program on the economic performances of agro-food industry: the results of a counterfactual analysis in Piedmont, Italy. CERIS Working Paper 201422. Inst Econ Res Firms Growth, Moncalieri, Italy.
Ratinger T, Medonos T, Hruška M, 2013. An assessment of the differentiated effects of the investment support to agricultural modernisation: the Case of the Czech Republic. Agris - On line Papers in Economics and Informatics 5 (4): 153-164.
Rosenbaum PR, 2002. Overt bias in observational studies. In: Observational studies; Rosenbaum PR (ed.). pp: 71-104. Springer, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3692-2_3
Sarb G, 2009. Results of implementing the SAPARD programme in Romania. http://protmed.uoradea.ro/facultate/anale/ecotox_zooteh_ind_alim/2009/imapa/90%20Sarb%20Gheorghe.pdf
Serefoglu C, Atsan T, 2012. The impact of the EU instrument for pre-accession for rural development (IPARD) to Turkey. Scientific Papers Series "Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development" 12 (4): 133-139.
Srhoj S, Walde J, 2020. Getting ready for EU single market: The effect of export-oriented grant schemes on firm performance. Struct Change Econ Dynam 52: 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.11.001
Srhoj S, Škrinjarić B, Radas S, Walde J, 2019. Closing the finance gap by nudging: impact assessment of public grants for women entrepreneurs. The Institute of Economics Working paper No. 1902, Zagreb, Croatia.
Srhoj S, Škrinjarić B, Radas S, 2021. Bidding against the odds? The impact evaluation of grants for young micro and small firms during the recession. Small Bus Econ 56 (1): 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00200-6
Stucki T, 2013. Success of start-up firms: the role of financial constraints. Ind Corp Change 23 (1): 25-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt008
Špička J, 2018. Dynamic effects of public investment support in the food and beverage industries. Agris On-line Papers in Economics and Informatics 10: 91-110. https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100108
Špička J, Naglova Z, Gurtler M, 2017. Effects of the investment support in the Czech meat processing industry. Agric Econ-Czech 63 (8): 356-369. https://doi.org/10.17221/367/2015-AGRICECON
Tanić S, 1995. Pregled stanja i Strategija razvitka poljoprivrede Republike Hrvatske [Review of the state and strategy of agricultural development of the Republic of Croatia]. Ministry of agriculture and forestry of the Republic of Croatia and FAO, Zagreb, Croatia.
Wooldridge JM, 2009. On estimating firm-level production functions using proxy variables to control for unobservables. Econ Lett 104 (3): 112-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.04.026
Yardimci M, Ari H, Aslan R, 2018. The impact of IPARD supports on structural and managerial features of dairy enterprises in Afyonkarahisar province. Ind J Anim Res 52 (1): 151-156. https://doi.org/10.18805/ijar.v0iOF.6987
Zenzerović R, Peruško T, 2006. Kratki osvrt na modele za predviđanje stečaja. [Short retrospection on bankruptcy prediction models]. Ekonomska istraživanja 19 (2): 132-151.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
