Short communication: Morphometric characterization of Lidia cow (Bos taurus) reproductive apparatus
Abstract
To study Lidia cow reproductive apparatus traits, a total of 90 organs were collected after slaughtering the cows from different Bos taurus breeds: (i) Lidia cattle breed - Brava dos Açores population (n=10) and Domecq lineage (n=11); (ii) Holstein Friesian females – 10-14-month-old heifers (n=15); 15-20-month-old heifers (n=10), 21-19-month-old heifers (n=18), and (iii) cows ≥ 30 months (n=26). The length and width were measured for five portions of the female reproductive apparatus (vulva and vagina, cervix, uterine body, uterine horns and ovaries). One-way ANOVA was performed with Tukey test. The level recognized to assume differences was p<0.05 to less. Differences were not shown between Lidia groups. In general, the Lidia cow reproductive apparatus was small in size that that of the matured cows in terms of all traits, with the exception of cervix rings (5.10 ± 0.17 rings) with p≤0.01 for all the groups (averages ranged from 3.33 ± 0.11 rings to 3.50 ± 0.15 rings). The vulva and vagina (L= 27.31 ± 0.53 cm; W=2.07 ± 0.14 cm), the uterine body width (3.01 ± 0.18 cm) and the uterine horns (L= 12.24 ± 0.32; W= 1.13 ± 0.10) showed were smaller in size than those of the evaluated heifers from HF breed that ranged in age from 10 to 14 months (p≤0.01). This study was the first to perform a morphometric characterization on the Lidia cow reproductive apparatus, and the results provide useful information for understanding reproductive approaches to be used with this breed.
Downloads
References
Bărdaş S, Blendea A, Irimescu I, Crişan M, Dezdrobitu C, Martonoş C, Tuns, F, Crivii C, Damian A, 2014. Morphometric characterization of the female bovine reproductive apparatus in several slaughtered specimens. Bull UASVM Vet Med 71 (1): 23-26.
Chacur M, Valentim N, Martinez A,Tostes R, Kronka S, 2006. Morfometria de ovários de fêmeas zebu Bos taurus indicus coletados em matadouro. Acta Sci Vet 34 (1): 65-70.
Correia P, Baron E, da Silva JM, Cortés O, 2014. Genetic relationships of the Portuguese Lidia bovine populations. Iran J Vet Res 15 (4): 364-369.
Demyda-Peyrás S, Hidalgo M, Dorado J, Anter J, Género E, Moreno-Millán M, 2013. In vitro oocyte maturation and fertilization rates in the Spanish Lidia bovine breed. Span J Agric Res 11 (2): 356-361. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3317
Filho A, 1982. Reprodução dos animais e inseminação artificial. Sulina, Porto Alegre, Brazil. 783 pp.
Gómez A, 2006. Problemática de la aplicación de las técnicas de inseminación artificial en el ganado vacuno de Lidia. ANGL. https://azslide.com/problematica-de-la-aplicacion-de-las-tecnicas-de-inseminacion-artificial-en-el-g_5a3d6a5a1723dd868ae4db77.html [5th May, 2016].
Hafez E, 1988. Reprodução animal. Manole, São Paulo, Brazil. 720 pp.
Jackson P, Cockroft P, 2002. Clinical examination of farm animals. Backwell Sci, Cambridge, UK. 313 pp. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752425
Jiménez J, Criado M, Molina A, 2007. Las razas bovinas de fomento andaluzas: Retinta y Lidia. In: Las razas ganaderas de Andalucía; Rodero FA, Rodero SE (eds). pp: 9-52. Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla, Spain.
Megale F, Couto E, 1959. Aspectos anatômicos do aparelho reprodutor de vacas azebuadas abatidas em matadouro. Arq Esc Sup Vet UREMG 12 (1): 529-535.
Montesinos A, 2002. Prototipos raciales del toro de Lidia. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación, Madrid. 270 pp.
Mukasa-Mugerwa E, 1989. A review of reproductive performance of female Bos indicus (zebu) cattle. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 134 pp.
Patrón RC, Téllez JRH, 2013. Reproducción asistida en ganado de Lidia. México. http://www.anvtmexico.com/Documentos/REPRODUCCION%20ASISTIDA%20EN%20GANADO%20DE%20LIDIA.pdf [5th May, 2016].
Perkins JR, Olds D, Sheath DM, 1954. A study of 1000 bovine genitalia. J Dairy Sci 37: 1158-1163. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(54)91384-3
Phocas F, Boivin X, Sapa J, Trillat G, Boissy A, Le Neindre P, 2006. Genetic correlations between temperament and breeding traits in Limousin heifers. Anim Sci 82: 805-811. https://doi.org/10.1017/ASC200696
Ramos EM, Cavalcante TV, Nunes RRM, Oliveira CM, Silva SMMS, Dias FEF, Maruo VM, Arrivabene M, 2008. Ovarian morphometry of zebu cows in the oriental Amazonia. Rev Bras Saúde Prod Anim 9 (4): 696-702.
Roberts SJ, 1971. Veterinary obstetrics and genital diseases (Theriogenology). Edwards Brothers, Ann Arbor, USA. 776 pp.
Silva B, Gonzalo A, Cañón J, 2006. Genetic parameters of aggressiveness, ferocity and mobility in the fighting bull breed. Anim Res 55: 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2005046
Sisson S, Grossman JD, 1986. Anatomia dos animais domésticos. Guanabara/Koogan, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 887 pp.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.