Greenhouse application of light-drone imaging technology for assessing weeds severity occurring on baby-leaf red lettuce beds approaching fresh-cutting
Abstract
Aim of study: For baby-leaf lettuces greenhouse cultivations the absence of weeds is a mandatory quality requirement. One of the most promising and innovative technologies in weed research, is the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (or drones) equipped with acquisition systems. The aim of this study was to provide an estimation of the exact weed amount on baby-sized red lettuce beds using a light drone equipped with an RGB microcamera.
Area of study: Trials were performed at specialized organic farm site in Eboli (Salerno, Italy), under polyethylene multi-tunnel greenhouse.
Material and methods: The RGB images acquired were processed with specific algorithms distinguishing weeds from crop yields, estimating the weeds covered surface and the severity of weed contamination in terms of biomass. A regression between the percentage of the surface covered by weed (with respect to the image total surface) and the weight of weed (with respect to the total harvested biomass) was calculated.
Main results: The regression between the total cover values of the 25 calibration images and the total weight measured report a significant linear correlation. Digital monitoring was able to capture with accuracy the highly variable weed coverage that, among the different grids positioned under real cultivation conditions, was in the range 0-16.4% of the total cultivated one.
Research highlights: In a precision weed management context, with the aim of improving management and decreasing the use of pesticides, this study provided an estimation of the exact weed amount on baby-sized red lettuce beds using a light drone.
Downloads
References
Andújar D, Rueda-Ayala V, Moreno H, Rosell-Polo JR, Valero C, Gerhards R, Fernández-Quintanilla C, Dorado J, Griepentrog HW, 2013. Discriminating crop, weeds and soil surface with a terrestrial LIDAR sensor. Sensors 13 (11): 14662-14675. https://doi.org/10.3390/s131114662
Anwar N, Izhar MA, Najam FA, 2018. Construction monitoring and reporting using drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). 10th Int Conf on Construction in the 21st Century (CITC-10), July 2-4, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ariffin SH, Gkatzionis K, Bakali S, 2017. Leaf injury and its effect towards shelf-life and quality of ready-to-eat (RTE) spinach. Energy Procedia 123: 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.265
Bajwa AA, Mahajan G, Chauhan BS, 2015. Nonconventional weed management strategies for modern agriculture. Weed Sci 63 (4): 723-747. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-15-00064.1
Bookstein FL, 1989. Principal warps: Thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE T Pattern Anal Machine Intell 11: 567-585. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.24792
Boyd NS, Brennan EB, Fennimore SA, 2006. Stale seedbed techniques for organic vegetable production. Weed Technol 20 (4): 1052-1057. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-109.1
Colelli G, Elia A, 2009. Physiologichal and technological aspects of fresh-cut horticultural products. Italus Hortus 16: 55-78.
Costa C, Antonucci F, Boglione C, Menesatti P, Vandeputte M, Chatain B, 2013. Automated sorting for size, sex and skeletal anomalies of cultured seabass using external shape analysis. Aquac Eng 52: 58-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaeng.2012.09.001
Derksen D, Lafond G, Thomas A, Loeppky H, Swanton C, 1993. Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: Tillage systems. Weed Sci 41 (3): 409-417. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500052127
Drysdale G, Metternicht G, 2003. Remote sensing for site-specific crop management: evaluating the potential of digital multi-spectral imagery for monitoring crop variability and weeds within paddocks. Proc 14th Congr, Perth, Western Australia, Aug 10-15.
El-Wahab RAA, 2018. Drone with embedded light emitting diodes (leds) against insects and mites in greenhouses. Curr Trends Nat Sci 7 (14): 236-244.
FAO, 1998. World reference base for soil resources. ISSS-ISRIC-FAO World Soil Resour Report No. 84. Rome.
Grahn C, Benedict C, Thornton T, Miles C, 2015. Baby-leaf salad green production guide for western Washington. WSU Extension Publication EM095E, 23 pp.
Kim DE, Shang X, Assefa AD, Keum YS, Saini RK, 2018. Metabolite profiling of green, green/red, and red lettuce cultivars: Variation in health beneficial compounds and antioxidant potential. Food Res Int 105: 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.11.028
Lamb DW, Brown RB, 2001. Remote-sensing and mapping of weeds in crops. J Agr Eng Res 78: 117-125. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.2000.0630
Lanini WT, Le Strange M, 1991. Low-input management of weeds in vegetable fields. Calif Agr 45 (1): 11-13. https://doi.org/10.3733/ca.v045n01p11
Liebman M, Davis AS, 2000. Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low-external-input farming systems. Weed Res 40: 27-47. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x
Ljevnaić-Mašić B, Knežević A, Džigurski D, Stojanović S, 2011. Weeds as vectors of disease and pests in organic production of leaf lettuce Lactuca sativa L. subsp. secalina Alef. (Asterales, Asteraceae). J Process Energ Agr 15: 35-38.
Macé K, Morlon P, Munier-Jolain N, Quéré L, 2007. Time scales as a factor in decision-making by French farmers on weed management in annual crops. Agr Syst 93: 115-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2006.04.007
Martínez-Sánchez A, Allende A, Cortes-Galera Y, Gil MI, 2008. Respiration rate response of four baby leaf Brassica species to cutting at harvest and fresh-cut washing. Postharvest Biol Technol 47: 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.07.010
Martínez-Sánchez A, Luna MC, Selma MV, Tudela JA, Abad J, Gil MI, 2012. Baby-leaf and multi-leaf of green and red lettuces are suitable raw materials for the fresh-cut industry. Postharvest Biol Technol 63: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2011.07.010
McMahon AT, Tapsell L, Williams P, Jobling J, 2013. Baby leafy green vegetables: providing insight into an old problem? An exploratory qualitative study examining influences on their consumption. Health Promotion Journal of Australia 24: 68-71. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE12901
Menesatti P, Angelini C, Pallottino F, Antonucci F, Aguzzi J, Costa C, 2012. RGB color calibration for quantitative image analysis: the "3D Thin-Plate Spline" warping approach. Sensors 12: 7063-7079. https://doi.org/10.3390/s120607063
Mulabagal V, Ngouajio M, Nair A, Zhang Y, Gottumukkala AL, Nair MG, 2010. In vitro evaluation of red and green lettuce (Lactuca sativa) for functional food properties. Food Chem 118: 300-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.119
Nomisma/UNAPROA, 2016. Rapporto sulla competitività del settore ortofrutticolo nazionale; Massimo Spigola (ed.). Unione Nazionale tra le Organizzazioni dei Produttori Ortofrutticoli, Agrumari e di Frutta in Guscio, Agra Editrice.
Pallottino F, Menesatti P, Figorilli S, Antonucci F, Tomasone R, Colantoni A, Costa C, 2018. Machine vision retrofit system for mechanical weed control in precision agriculture applications. Sustainability 10 (7): 2209. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072209
Peña JM, Torres-Sánchez J, de Castro AI, Kelly M, López-Granados F, 2013. Weed mapping in early-season maize fields using object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. PLoS ONE 8 (10): e77151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077151
Peña J, Torres-Sánchez J, Serrano-Pérez A, de Castro A, López-Granados F, 2015. Quantifying efficacy and limits of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) technology for weed seedling detection as affected by sensor resolution. Sensors 15 (3): 5609-5626. https://doi.org/10.3390/s150305609
Pike DR, Stoller EW, Wax LM, 1990. Modeling soybean growth and canopy apportionment in weed-soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci 38: 522-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500051419
Pimpini F, Giannini M, Lazzarin R, 2005. Ortaggi da foglia da taglio. Veneto Agricoltura, pp. 46-53.
Regional Agro-meteorological Center of Campania Region, 2020. http://www.agricoltura.regione.campania.it/meteo/agrometeo.htm [06/2020].
Regione Campania, 2004. Carta dei suoli della piana in destra sele in scala 1:50.000. Regione Campania, Assessorato all'Agricoltura, SeSIRCA Naples.
Rueda-Ayala VP, Peña JM, Höglind M, Bengochea-Guevara JM, Andújar D, 2019. Comparing UAV-based technologies and RGB-D reconstruction methods for plant height and biomass monitoring on grass ley. Sensors 19: 535. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19030535
Saadatseresht M, Hashempour AH, Hasanlou M, 2015. UAV photogrammetry: a practical solution for challenging mapping projects. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inform Sci 40 (1): 619. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-619-2015
Saini RK, Ko EY, Keum YS, 2017. Minimally processed ready-to-eat baby-leaf vegetables: Production, processing, storage, microbial safety, and nutritional potential. Food Rev Int 33: 644-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1204614
Slaughter DC, Giles DK, Downey D, 2008. Autonomous robotic weed control systems: A review. Comput Electron Agr 61 (1): 63-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2007.05.008
Yao L, Wang Q, Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Cao W, Ni J, 2019. UAV-borne dual-band sensor method for monitoring physiological crop status. Sensors 19: 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040816
Young SL, Meyer GE, Woldt WE, 2014. Future directions for automated weed management in precision agriculture. In: Automation: The future of weed control in cropping systems, pp: 249-259. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7512-1_15
Yu J, Sharpe SM, Schumann AW, Boyd NS, 2019. Deep learning for image-based weed detection in turfgrass. Eur J Agron 104: 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2019.01.004
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
