Effect of soil particle-size distribution (PSD) on soil-subsoiler interactions in the discrete element model

  • Xuezhen Wang Northwest A&F University, College of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Yangling 712100
  • Wuquan Wei Northwest A&F University, College of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Yangling 712100
  • Jinpu He Northwest A&F University, College of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Yangling 712100
  • Yuxiang Huang Northwest A&F University, College of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Yangling 712100
Keywords: discrete element method (DEM), soil disturbance characteristics, soil cutting forces, nominal radii, calibration, soil bin tests

Abstract

Aim of study: This work investigated the significance and mechanism for the effect of particle-size distribution (PSD) under different nominal radii using the discrete element method (DEM) and validated using the laboratory soil-bin results to accurately determine PSD.

Area of study: Yangling, China

Material and methods: The experimental soil was Lou soil. Soil disturbance characteristics (soil rupture distance ratio, height of accumulated soil, soil density change rate) and cutting forces (draft and vertical) under different treatments were predicted and measured respectively.

Main results: The ANOVA outputs showed that PSD significantly affected draft and vertical forces (p<5%) while soil disturbance characteristics was significantly affected by PSD only when particles of 9 mm nominal radii or larger were used in DEM models. Both draft and vertical forces in real time were noisier at larger PSDs. For the given soil, more realistic soil disturbance characteristics and draft force can be achieved by taking PSD into account in the calibration of DEM models; however, vertical force can be predicted with a relatively low error only when particles of 7 mm nominal radii or smaller are used in the discrete element model, regardless of the magnitude of PSD.

Research highlights: The significance and mechanism for the effect of PSD provided in this study can be used to guide the decision of particle-size distribution in the soil-tool interaction DEM models (using the HMB contact model).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asaf Z, Rubinstein D, Shmulevich I, 2007. Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage. Soil Till Res 92: 227-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.03.006

Chen Y, Cavers C, Tessier S, Monero F, Lobb D, 2005. Short-term tillage effects on soil cone index and plant development in a poorly drained, heavy clay soil. Soil Till Res 82: 161-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2004.06.006

Chen Y, Munkholm LJ, Nyord T, 2013. A discrete element model for soil-sweep interaction in three different soils. Soil Till Res 126: 34-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.08.008

Coetzee CJ, Els DNJ, 2009. Calibration of discrete element parameters and the modelling of silo discharge and bucket filling. Comp Electron Agric 65: 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2008.10.002

Ding Q, Ren J, Adam BE, Zhao J, Ge S, Li Y, 2017. DEM analysis of subsoiling process in wet clayey paddy soil. T Chin Soc Agric Mach 48: 38-48.

Fielke JM, 1999. Finite element modelling of the interaction of the cutting edge of tillage implements with soil. J Agric Eng Res 74: 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0440

Godwin RJ, Spoor G, 1977. Soil failure with narrow tines. J Agric Eng Res 22: 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8634(77)90044-0

Godwin RJ, 2007. A review of the effect of implement geometry on soil failure and implement forces. Soil Till Res 97: 331-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2006.06.010

Gu X, Lu L, Qian J, 2017. Discrete element modeling of the effect of particle size distribution on the small strain stiffness of granular soils. Particuology 32 : 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2016.08.002

Hang C, Huang Y, Zhu R, 2017. Analysis of the movement behaviour of soil between subsoilers based on the discrete element method. J Terramechanics 74: 35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2017.10.002

Hang C, Gao X, Yuan M, Huang Y, Zhu R, 2018. Discrete element simulations and experiments of soil disturbance as affected by the tine spacing of subsoiler. Biosys Eng 163: 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.03.008

Hettiaratchi DRP, Witney BD, Reece AR, 1966. The calculation of passive pressure in two-dimensional soil failure. J Agric Eng Res 11: 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8634(66)80045-8

Huang Y, Hang C, Yuan M, Wang B, Zhu R, 2016. Discrete element simulation and experiment on disturbance behavior of subsoiling. T Chin Soc Agric Mach 47: 80-88.

Li B, Chen Y, Chen J, 2016. Modeling of soil-claw interaction using the discrete element method (DEM). Soil Till Res 158: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2015.12.010

Li B, Chen Y, Chen J, 2018. Comparison of two subsoiling designs using the discrete element method (DEM). T ASABE 61: 1529-1537. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.12629

Liu F, Zhang J, Li B, Chen J, 2016. Calibration of parameters of wheat required in discrete element method simulation based on repose angle of particle heap. T Chin Soc Agric Eng 32: 247-253.

Mak J, Chen Y, Sadek MA, 2012. approach employs the similarity criteria to account for the effect of scaling-up soil particle sizes on model quality. Soil Till Res 118: 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2011.10.019

Milkevych V, Munkholm LJ, Chen Y, Nyord T, 2018. Modelling approach for soil displacement in tillage using discrete element method. Soil Till Res 183: 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.05.017

Momozu M, Oida A, Yamazaki M, Koolen AJ, 2003. Simulation of a soil loosening process by means of the modified distinct element method. J Terramechanics 39: 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4898(03)00011-9

Perfect E, Diaz-Zorita M, Grove JH, 2002. A prefractal model for predicting soil fragment mass-size distributions. Soil Till Res 64: 79-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00246-X

Shahgoli G, Saunders C, Desbiolles J, Fielke J, 2009. The effect of oscillation angle on the performance of oscillatory tillage. Soil Till Res 104: 97-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2009.01.003

Shi L, Zhao W, Sun W, 2017. Parameter calibration of soil particles contact model of farmland soil in northwest arid region based on discrete element method. T Chin Soc Agric Eng 33: 181-187.

Shmulevich I, 2010. State of the art modeling of soil-tillage interaction using discrete element method. Soil Till Res 111: 41-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2010.08.003

Shmulevich I, Asaf Z, Rubinstein D, 2007. Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method. Soil Till Res 97: 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2007.08.009

Tamas K, 2018. The role of bond and damping in the discrete element model of soil-sweep interaction. Biosys Eng 169: 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2018.02.001

Tamas K, Jóri IJ, Mouazen AM, 2013. Modelling soil-sweep interaction with discrete element method. Soil Till Res 134: 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.09.001

Tanaka H, Inooku K, Nagasaki Y, Miyzaki M, Sumikawa O, Oida A, 2000. Simulation of soil loosening at subsurface tillage using a vibrating type sub-soiler by means of the distinct element method. 8th Europe ISTVS Conference, Umea.

Ucgul M, Fielke JM, Saunders C, 2014a. 3D DEM tillage simulation: Validation of a hysteretic spring (plastic) contact model for a sweep tool operating in a cohesionless soil. Soil Till Res 144: 220-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2013.10.003

Ucgul M, Fielke JM, Saunders C, 2014b. Three-dimensional discrete element modelling of tillage: Determination of a suitable contact model and parameters for a cohesionless soil. Biosys Eng 121: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.02.005

Ucgul M, Fielke JM, Saunders C, 2015. Three-dimensional discrete element modelling (DEM) of tillage: Accounting for soil cohesion and adhesion. Biosys Eng 129: 298-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2014.11.006

Ucgul M, Saunders C, Fielke JM, 2017. Discrete element modelling of top soil burial using a full scale mouldboard plough under field conditions. Biosys Eng 160: 140-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.06.008

Wang X, Yue B, Gao X, Zheng Z, Zhu R, Huang Y, 2018. Discrete element simulations and experiments of disturbance behavior as affected by the mounting height of the subsoiler's wing. T Chin Soc Agric Mach 49: 129-141.

Yang Y, Li M, Tong J, Ma Y, 2018. Study on the interaction between soil and the five-claw combination of a mole using the discrete element method. Appl Bionics Biomech 2018: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7854052

Zeng Z, Chen Y, Zhang X, 2017. Modelling the interaction of a deep tillage tool with heterogeneous soil. Comp Electron Agric 143: 130-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.10.005

Zhang R, Li J, 2006. Simulation on mechanical behavior of cohesive soil by distinct element method. J Terramechanics 43: 303-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.006

Zhang R, Chen B, Li J, Xu S, 2008. DEM simulation of clod crushing by bionic bulldozing plate. J Bionic Eng 5: 72-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60075-X

Zhang X, Chen Y, 2017. Soil disturbance and cutting forces of four different sweeps for mechanical weeding. Soil Till Res 168: 167-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.01.002

Zheng K, He J, Li H, Dao P, Wang Q, Zhao H, 2016. Research on polyline soil-breaking blade subsoiler based on subsoiling soil model using discrete element method. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach 47: 62-72.

Zhou H, Zhang W, Yang Q, Li D, Xia J, 2019. Design and experiment of sliding cutting self-excited vibration. T Chin Soc Agric Mach 50: 71-78.
Published
2021-04-16
How to Cite
Wang, X., Wei, W., He, J., & Huang, Y. (2021). Effect of soil particle-size distribution (PSD) on soil-subsoiler interactions in the discrete element model. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(1), e0205. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021191-16584
Section
Agricultural engineering