Prioritization of olive breeding objectives in Spain: Analysis of a producers and researchers survey

  • Lorenzo León Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA), Centro Alameda del Obispo, Avda. Menéndez Pidal, s/n, 14004, Córdoba
  • Raúl de la Rosa Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA), Centro Alameda del Obispo, Avda. Menéndez Pidal, s/n, 14004, Córdoba
  • Manuel Arriaza Instituto de Investigación y Formación Agraria y Pesquera (IFAPA), Centro Alameda del Obispo, Avda. Menéndez Pidal, s/n, 14004, Córdoba
Keywords: Olea europaea, productivity, Verticillium wilt, oil content, water stress, Xylella fastidiosa

Abstract

Aim of study: Trait prioritization of potential olive (Olea europaea L.) breeding objectives has been evaluated in this work from two surveys to researchers working on olive and olive producers / orchard managers.

Area of study: Olive growing area in Andalusia (South of Spain)

Material and methods: Twenty-five breeding objectives were associated to plant growth, fructification, oil content and composition, resistance to pest and disease and tolerance to soil and climatic conditions. Two assessment methods were applied (ranking and rating), showing similar results in both the researchers and producers surveys.

Main results: Higher productivity was the objective with the highest score, followed by Verticillium wilt resistance and higher oil content. After them, tolerance to water stress and resistance to Xylella fastidiosa were among the preferred objectives. Conversely, the least preferred objectives were late harvesting, high fruit size and tolerance to water lodging and calcareous soils. In the producers’ survey, results have been consistent among the different types of orchards and farmers’ characteristics. It is also interesting to notice that more than 50% of the producers expressed their willingness to orchard enlargement or renewal in the three coming years and 25% of them would change the olive cultivar. They would be willing to pay an average 43% overprice for new cultivar fulfilling their requirements and 75% would support the use of genetic modified olives.

Research highlights: These results should be considered to analyze the scope of current breeding programs and define the main criteria to be considered for future works aiming at developing new olive cultivars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AGAPA, 2002. El olivar andaluz. Consejería de Agricultura y Pesca, Junta de Andalucía, Sevilla. 134 pp.

Alowaiesh B, Singh Z, Fang Z, Kailis SG, 2018. Harvest time impacts the fatty acid compositions, phenolic compounds and sensory attributes of Frantoio and Manzanilla olive oil. Sci Hortic 234: 74-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.017

Badenes ML, Byrne DH, 2011. Fruit breeding. Springer Sci Bus Media, NY. 875 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0763-9

Barranco D, Rallo L, 2000. Olive cultivars in Spain. Horttechnology 10: 107-110. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH.10.1.107

Bellini E, Giordani E, Rosati A, 2008. Genetic improvement of olive from clonal selection to cross-breeding programs. Adv Hortic Sci 22:73-86.

CAGPDS, 2021. Aforo de producción del olivar de almazara en Andalucía campaña 2020-2021. Consejería de Agricultura, Ganadería, Pesca y Desarrollo Sostenible. Junta de Andalucía.

Cicchetti DV, 1994. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6: 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284

De Chiusole D, Stefanutti l, 2011. Rating, ranking, or both? A joint application of two probabilistic models for the measurement of values. Test Psycho Method Appl Psychol 18 (1): 49-60.

De la Rosa R, León L, Guerrero N, Rallo L, Barranco D, 2007. Preliminary results of an olive cultivar trial at high density. Aust J Agr Res 58: 392-395. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06265

Fernández Escobar R, De la Rosa R, Leon L, Gomez JA, Testi F, Orgaz M, et al., 2012. Evolution and sustainability of the olive production systems. Int Semin: Present and Future of the Mediterranean Olive Sector, Zaragoza (Spain), Nov 26-28.

Fontanazza G, Bartolozzi F, Vergari G, 1998. Fs-17. Riv Frutticoltura 5: 61.

Gallardo RK, Nguyen D, McCracken V, Yue C, Luby J, McFerson J, 2012. An investigation of trait prioritization in rosaceous fruit breeding programs. HortScience 47(6): 771-776. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.47.6.771

Gracia P, Sánchez-Gimeno AC, Benito M, Oria R, Lasa JM, 2012. Short communication. Harvest time in hedgerow 'Arbequina' olive orchards in areas with early frosts. Span J Agric Res 10: 179-182. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012101-141-11

IOC, 2021. World olive oil and table olive figures. International Olive Council. https://www.internationaloliveoil.org/what-we-do/economic-affairs-promotion-unit/#figures

Koo TK, Li MY, 2016. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med 15: 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012

Lavee S, 2013. Evaluation of the need and present potential of olive breeding indicating the nature of the available genetic resources involved. Sci Hortic 161: 333-339 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.002

Lavee S, Haskal A, Wodner M, 1986. 'Barnea' a new olive cultivar from first breeding generation. Olea 17: 95-99.

López-Escudero FJ, Mercado-Blanco J, 2011. Verticillium wilt of olive: a case study to implement an integrated strategy to control a soil-borne pathogen. Plant Soil 344: 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-010-0629-2

Malhotra NK, Birks DF, 1999. Marketing research. Prentice Hall, London.

Moore M, 1975. Rating versus ranking in the Rokeach Valey Survey: an israeli comparison. Eur J Soc Psychol 5 (3): 405-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420050313

Moors G, Vriens I, Gelissen JPTM, Vermunt JK, 2016. Two of a kind. Similarities between ranking and rating data in measuring values. Surv Res Method 10 (1): 15-33.

Narvaez I, Khayreddine T, Pliego C, Cerezo S, Jimenez-Diaz RM, Trapero-Casas JL, et al., 2018. Usage of the heterologous expression of the antimicrobial gene afp from Aspergillus giganteus for increasing fungal resistance in olive. Front Plant Sci 9: 680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00680

Parras-Rosa M, Torres-Ruiz FJ, Gómez-Limón JA, Ruz-Carmona A, Vega-Zamora M, Parra-López C, et al., 2021. Estrategias para una oleicultura jiennense más competitiva. Diputación Provincial de Jaén, Instituto de Estudios Giennenses, Jaén.

Rallo L, Barranco D, De la Rosa R, León L, 2008. 'Chiquitita' olive. HortScience 43: 529-531. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.43.2.529

Rojnic ID, Bazok R, Barcic JI, 2015. Reduction of olive fruit fly damage by early harvesting and impact on oil quality parameters. Eur J Lipid Sci Tech 117: 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejlt.201400150

Salazar-Ordoñez M, Rodríguez-Entrena M, Cabrera ER, Henseler J, 2018. Understanding product differentiation failures: the role of product knowledge and brand credence in olive oil markets. Food Qual Prefer 68: 146-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.02.010

Salazar-Ordoñez M, Rodríguez-Entrena M, Arriaza M, 2021. How do consumers respond to price gaps in private brands agrifood products? Brit Food J. Forthcoming DOI: 10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1155 https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2020-1155

Sanz-Cañada J, Hervás-Fernández I, Sánchez-Escobar F, Coq-Huelva D, 2011. Programa Nacional de Redes del Plan Nacional de I+D+i: Alenta. Plataforma Tecnológica del Olivar. CSIC, Madrid.

Sayadi S, González-Roa MC, Calatrava-Requena J, 2005. Ranking versus scale rating in conjoint analysis: Evaluating landscapes in mountainous regions in southeastern Spain. Ecol Econ 55: 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.010

Stemler SE, Tsai J, 2008. Best practices in interrater reliability. Three common approaches. In: Best practices in quantitative methods; Osborne JW (ed). pp: 29-49. Sage, London. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d5

Yue C, Gallardo RK, Luby J, Rihn A, McFerson JR, McCracken V, et al., 2013. An investigation of U.S. apple producers' trait prioritization-evidence from audience surveys. HortScience 48: 1378-1384. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.11.1378

Yue C, Gallardo RK, Luby J, Rihn A, McFerson JR, McCracken V, et al., 2014a. An evaluation of U.S. tart and sweet cherry producers trait prioritization: evidence from audience surveys. HortScience 49: 931-937. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.7.931

Yue C, Gallardo RK, Luby J, Rihn A, McFerson JR, McCracken V, et al., 2014b. An evaluation of U.S. peach producers' trait prioritization: evidence from audience surveys. HortScience 49: 1309-1314. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.49.10.1309

Zhao S, Yue C, Luby J, Gallardo K, McCracken V, McFerson J, Layne DR, 2017. U.S. Peach producer preference and willingness to pay for fruit attributes. HortScience 52:116-121. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI10966-16

Published
2021-09-27
How to Cite
León, L., de la Rosa, R., & Arriaza, M. (2021). Prioritization of olive breeding objectives in Spain: Analysis of a producers and researchers survey. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 19(4), e0701. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2021194-18203
Section
Plant breeding, genetics and genetic resources