Quality of Santa Inês × Dorper sheep meat submitted to different levels of inclusion of sunflower cake
Abstract
Aim of study: To evaluate the physicochemical and sensory quality of meat from Santa Inês × Dorper lambs fed diets with increasing levels of sunflower cake.
Area of study: Rio Grande do Norte (Brazil).
Material and methods: Twenty-four castrated lambs (initial weight of 18.9 ± 2.17 kg) were distributed in a completely randomized design with four treatments (0, 5, 10 and 15% sunflower cake in diet) with six repetitions and kept in confinement until reaching the average body weight of 32.1 ± 2.6 kg. The Longissimus lumborum muscle was used for proximate composition and physicochemical analyzes, and the Semimembranosus muscle was used for pH (after 24 h of slaughter) and sensory analysis assays.
Main results: The increasing levels of sunflower cake did not affect the composition or physicochemical properties. Sensory analysis also did not reveal significant differences in meat obtained from animals in different diets. Principal Components Analysis indicated that juiciness, color, odor and flavor were positioned opposite to protein, texture, and ash.
Research highlights: The use of sunflower cake in diets for crossbred sheep Dorper × Santa Inês as soybean meal and corn replacer, up to 15% inclusion of soybean meal and corn, does not affect the proximate composition, physicochemical or sensory characteristics of the meat.
Downloads
References
AOAC, 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Washington, DC.
Bagaldo AR, Miranda GS, Soares Júnior MSF, de Araújo FL, Matoso RVM, Chizzotti ML et al., 2019. Effect of Licuri cake supplementation on performance, digestibility, ingestive behavior, carcass traits and meat quality of grazing lambs. Small Rumin Res 177: 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.020
Bezerra LS, Barbosa AM, Carvalho GGP, Simionato JI, Freitas JE, Araújo MLGML et al., 2016. Meat quality of lambs fed diets with peanut cake. Meat Sci 121: 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.05.019
Bhatti MA, Øvrum Gaarder M, Steinheim G, Hopkins DL, Horneland R, Eik LO, Ådnøy T, 2020. Lamb or hogget meat - A different sensory profile? Extending the fresh meat season in Norway. Small Rumin Res 185: 106086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2020.106086
Bickerstaffe R, Bekhit AED, Robertson LJ, Roberts N, Geesink GH, 2001. Impact of introducing specifications on the tenderness of retail meat. Meat Sci 59: 303-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(01)00083-3
Brasil, 2000. Instrução normativa No. 3, 17 January 2000. Aprova o regulamento técnico de métodos de insensibilização para o abate humanitário de animais de açougue. 24 January 2000.
Bratzler LJ, 1949. Determining the tenderness of meat by use of the Warner-Bratzler method. Proc Reciprocal Meat Conf. Savoy, IL, USA. pp: 117-121.
Brazil OAV, Vilanova-Neta JL, Silva NO, Vieira IMM, Lima ÁS, Ruzene DS, et al., 2019. Integral use of lignocellulosic residues from different sunflower accessions: Analysis of the production potential for biofuels. J Clean Prod 221: 430-438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.274
Chauhan SS, Ponnampalam EN, Dunshea FR, Warner RD, 2019. Breed and nutrition effects on meat quality and retail color after lamb pre-slaughter stress. Meat Muscle Biol 3: 147-157. https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb2018.10.0033
Costa JB, Oliveira RL, Silva TM, Barbosa AM, Borja MS, de Pellegrini CB et al., 2018. Fatty acid, physicochemical composition and sensory attributes of meat from lambs fed diets containing licuri cake. PLoS One 13: e0206863. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206863
de Melo AMP, López-Pedrouso M, Costa RG, Franco D, Moura AAAN, da Silva TA et al., 2020. Proteome changes in lamb semimembranosus muscles associated with the inclusion of sunflower cake in their diet. Int J Food Sci Technol 55: 995-1001. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.14328
Elmasry G, Barbin DF, Sun DW, Allen P, 2012. Meat quality evaluation by hyperspectral imaging technique: an overview. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 52: 689-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.507908
FAOSTAT, 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home [Oct 26, 2021].
Ferguson DM, Warner RD, 2008. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat quality in ruminants? Meat Sci 80: 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
Folch J, Lees M, Stanley GH, 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226: 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(18)64849-5
Hamam M, Chinnici G, Di Vita G, Pappalardo G, Pecorino B, Maesano G, D'Amico M, 2021. Circular economy models in agro-food systems: A review. Sustain 13: 3453. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063453
Hamdi H, Majdoub-Mathlouthi L, Picard B, Listrat A, Durand D, Znaïdi IA, Kraiem K, 2016. Carcass traits, contractile muscle properties and meat quality of grazing and feedlot Barbarine lamb receiving or not olive cake. Small Rumin Res 145: 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2016.10.028
Hamm R, 1961. Biochemistry of meat hydration. Adv Food Res 10: 355-463. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2628(08)60141-X
Honikel KO, 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Sci 49: 447-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00034-5
Howell DC, 2010. Multiple comparisons among treatment means. In: Statistical methods for psychology. Howell, DC (ed.). pp: 363-411. Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Belmont, USA.
Huff-Lonergan E, Lonergan SM, 2005. Mechanisms of water-holding capacity of meat: The role of postmortem biochemical and structural changes. Meat Sci 71: 194-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.04.022
ISO 8586-1, 1993. Sensory analysis methodology. General guidance for the selection and training and monitoring of assessors. Part 1. Selected assessors. International Standards Organisation publications.
ISO 8589, 2014. Sensory analysis. General guidance for the design of test rooms. International Standards Organisation publications.
Issakowicz J, Bueno MS, Barbosa CMP, Canova EB, Moreira HL, Geraldo AT, Sampaio ACK, 2017. Crambe cake impairs lamb performance and fatty acid profile of meat. Anim Prod Sci 57: 785-792. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15360
Khan MI, Jo C, Tariq MR, 2015. Meat flavor precursors and factors influencing flavor precursors - A systematic review. Meat Sci 110: 278-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.08.002
Khliji S, van de Ven R, Lamb TA, Lanza M, Hopkins DL, 2010. Relationship between consumer ranking of lamb colour and objective measures of colour. Meat Sci 85: 224-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.01.002
Knapik J, Ropka-Molik K, Pieszka M, 2017. Genetic and nutritional factors determining the production and quality of sheep meat - A review. Ann Anim Sci 17: 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/aoas-2016-0036
Lima AGVDO, Oliveira RL, Silva TM, Barbosa AM, Nascimento TVC, Oliveira VS, Ribeiro RDX, Pereira ES, Bezerra LR, 2018. Feeding sunflower cake from biodiesel production to Santa Ines lambs: Physicochemical composition, fatty acid profile and sensory attributes of meat. PLoS One 13: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188648
Lobo RNB, 2019. Opportunities for investment into small ruminant breeding programmes in Brazil. J Anim Breed Genet 136: 313-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12396
Macfie HJ, Bratchell N, Greenhoff K, Vallis LV, 1989. Designs to balance the effect of order of presentation and first‐order carry‐over effects in hall tests. J Sens Stud 4: 129-148. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1989.tb00463.x
Morales-Jerrett E, Mancilla-Leytón JM, Delgado-Pertíñez M, Mena Y, 2020. The contribution of traditional meat goat farming systems to human wellbeing and its importance for the sustainability of this livestock subsector. Sustain 12: 1181. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031181
Nobre PT, Munekata PES, Costa RG, Carvalho FR, Ribeiro NL, Queiroga RCRE et al., 2020. The impact of dietary supplementation with guava (Psidium guajava L.) agroindustrial waste on growth performance and meat quality of lambs. Meat Sci 164: 108105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108105
NRC, 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. National Research Council, National Academies Press.
Oliveira RL, Palmieri AD, Carvalho ST, Leão AG, de Abreu CL, Ribeiro CVDM et al., 2015. Commercial cuts and chemical and sensory attributes of meat from crossbred Boer goats fed sunflower cake-based diets. Anim Sci J 86: 557-562. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12325
Peacock C, Sherman DM, 2010. Sustainable goat production-Some global perspectives. Small Rumin Res 89: 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2009.12.029
Pearce KL, Rosenvold K, Andersen HJ, Hopkins DL, 2011. Water distribution and mobility in meat during the conversion of muscle to meat and ageing and the impacts on fresh meat quality attributes - A review. Meat Sci 89: 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.04.007
Ponnampalam EN, Holman BWB, Scollan ND, 2015. Sheep: Meat. In: Encyclopedia of food and health; Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldrá F (eds.). pp: 750-757. Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00620-6
Ramírez CA, Blanco FP, Ibanez AH, Sanchez NN, Domenech FR, Medina PG, Marin ALM, 2018. Effects of concentrates rich in by-products on growth performance,carcass characteristics and meat quality traits of light lambs. Anim Prod Sci 59: 593-599. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17798
Ribeiro RDX, Medeiros AN, Oliveira RL, de Araújo GGL, Queiroga RCE, Ribeiro MD et al., 2018. Palm kernel cake from the biodiesel industry in goat kid diets. Part 2: Physicochemical composition, fatty acid profile and sensory attributes of meat. Small Rumin Res 165: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.05.014
Rødbotten M, Kubberød E, Lea P, Ueland Ø, 2004. A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species. Meat Sci 68: 137-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.016
Salami SA, Luciano G, O'Grady MN, Biondi L, Newbold CJ, Kerry JP, Priolo A, 2019a. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Anim Feed Sci Technol 251: 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006
Salami SA, Valenti B, O'Grady MN, Kerry JP, Mattioli S, Licitra G et al., 2019b. Influence of dietary cardoon meal on growth performance and selected meat quality parameters of lambs, and the antioxidant potential of cardoon extract in ovine muscle homogenates. Meat Sci 153: 126-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.03.017
Sales RO, Sobrinho AGS, Zeola NMBL, Lima NLL, Manzi GM, de Almeida FA, Endo V, 2013. Fresh and matured lamb meat quality fed with sunflower seeds and vitamin E. Cienc Rural 43: 151-157. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013000100025
SAS Institute, 2003. The SAS System for Windows.
Subaşı BG, Vahapoğlu B, Capanoglu E, Mohammadifar MA, 2021. A review on protein extracts from sunflower cake: techno-functional properties and promising modification methods. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1904821 https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1904821
Warner RD, 2017. The eating quality of meat - IV Water-holding capacity and juiciness. In: Lawrie's meat science, 8th ed, chapter 14. pp: 419-459. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100694-8.00014-5
Webb EC, Casey NH, Simela L, 2005. Goat meat quality. Small Rumin Res 60: 153-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2005.06.009
Xazela NM, Chimonyo M, Muchenje V, Marume U, 2012. Effect of sunflower cake supplementation on meat quality of indigenous goat genotypes of South Africa. Meat Sci 90: 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.001
Copyright (c) 2022 INIA-CSIC
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
