Estimating consumer preferences for extrinsic and intrinsic attributes of vegetables. A study of German consumers
Abstract
Preference formation developed during the consumer’s evaluation of alternatives is one of the most important stages in models of consumer purchasing behaviour. This is especially true for the purchase of vegetables. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of extrinsic versus intrinsic attributes in the behaviour of consumer when purchasing cucumbers, considering four attributes; price, country of origin and production method (extrinsic), and freshness (intrinsic). Utilizing a sample of German tourists visiting the city of Almería (Spain), conjoint analysis methodology is used. The results suggest that an intrinsic aspect (freshness) is the most important attribute for consumers. Therefore, marketers are advised to consider the importance of this attribute to the consumer and try to position the product in the destination markets on the basis of product freshness.Downloads
References
Acharya CH, Elliott G, 2001. An examination of the effects of 'country-of-design' and 'country-of assembly' on quality perceptions and parchase intentions. Aust Mark J 9 (1): 61-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(01)70167-X
Albardiaz M, 2000. Alimentos ecológicos. Horticultura Internacional 34: 16-24.
Alvesleben R, Schrader S, 1998. Consumer attitudes towards regional food products. A case-study for Northern Germany. Proc AIR-CAT Works Consumer Attitudes Towards Typical Foods, Dijon (France).
Arcas N, Munuera JL, 1998. El cooperativismo como estrategia para mejorar la competitividad de la empresa agroalimentaria. Dist Cons 42: 55-71.
Babicz-Zielinska E, 1999. Food preferences among the Polish young adults. Food Qual Prefer 10(2): 139-145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(99)00005-1
Babicz-Zielinska E, Zagorska A, 1998. Factors affecting the preferences for vegetables and fruits. Pol J Food Nut Sci 7/48(4): 755-762.
Baker G, Crosbie P, 1994. Consumer preferences for food safety attributes: a market segment approach. Agribus 10: 319-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-6297(199407/08)10:4<319::AID-AGR2720100405>3.0.CO;2-J
Barroso M, Briz J, Grande I, 2004. Estructura de las preferencias de los consumidores y segmentación del mercado, respecto al vino verde del Norte de Portugal. Proc V Congreso de Economía Agraria. Santiago de Compostela (Spain).
Bernabéu R, Tendero A, 2004. Diferencias en las preferencias de los consumidores de carne de cordero. Dist Cons 73: 101-107.
Bernabéu R, Tendero A, Olmeda M, Castillo S, 2001. Actitudes del consumidor de vino con denominación de origen en la provincia de Albacete. Proc IV Congreso Nacional de Economía Agraria. Pamplona (Spain).
Bernabéu R, Tendero A, Castillo S, Díaz M, Olmeda M, 2004. Análisis de las preferencias de los consumidores de queso en la provincia de Albacete. Proc V Congreso de Economía Agraria. Santiago de Compostela (Spain).
Bernabéu R, Martínez-Carrasco L, Brugarolas M, Díaz M, 2007. Estrategias de diferenciación del vino tinto de calidad en Castilla-La Mancha. Agrociencia (Mex) 41: 583-595.
Brugarolas M, Rivera LM, 2002. Comportamiento del consumidor valenciano ante los productos ecológicos e integrados. Estud Agrosoc Pesq 192: 105-121.
Brugarolas M, Martínez A, Prieto N, Martínez-Carrasco L, 2003. Determinación mediante análisis conjunto de la importancia de los atributos comerciales de la uva de mesa. Act Hort 39: 49-51.
Buitrago J, 1994. La empresa hortofrutícola y los estudios de mercado. Hortofruticultura 1: 46-52.
Campbell B, Nelson RG, Ebel R, Dozier W, Adrian J, Hockema B, 2004. Fruit quality characteristics that affect consumer preferences for satsuma mandarins. HortScience 39: 1664-1669.
Cardello AV, Schutz HG, 2003. The concept of food freshness: uncovering its meaning and importance to consumers. In: Freshness and shelf life of foods (Cadwallader KR, Weenen H, eds.). Am Chem Soc, Washington, USA. pp: 22-41.
Chan-Halbrendt C, Zhllima E, Sisior G, Imani D, Leonetti L, 2010. Consumer preferences for olive oil in Tirana. Int Food Agr Manage Rev 13(3): 55-74.
Chinen K, 2010. Relations among ethnocentrism, product preference and government policy attitudes: a survey of Japanese consumers. Int J Manage 27(1): 107-116.
Compés R, 2002. Atributos de confianza, normas y certificación. Comparación de estándares para hortalizas. Econ Agrar Recurs Nat 2(1): 115-130.
Dagupen MK, Tagarino DD, Gumihid BB, Gellynck X, Viaene J, 2009. The ideal vegetable attributes based on consumer preferences: a conjoint analysis approach. Act Hort 831: 185-192.
Eiser R, Miles S, Frewer L, 2002. Trust, perceived risk and attitudes towards food technologies. J Appl Soc Psych 32(11): 2423-2434.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb01871.x
Eroglu SA, Machleit KA, 1989. Effects of individual and product-specific variables on utilizing country-of-origin as a product quality cue. Int Mark Rev 6(6): 27-41.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001525
FAO, 2003. Los mercados mundiales de frutas y verduras orgánicas. Food and Agriculture Organization, Roma. Available in http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/004/Y1669S/Y1669S00.htm).
Fishburn PC, Roberts FS, 1998. Unique finite conjoint measurement. Math Soc Sci 16(2): 107-143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(88)90046-7
Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, 2001. Are quality labels a real marketing advantage? A conjoint application on Greek PDO protected olive oil. J Int Food Agrib Mark 12(1): 1-22.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J047v12n01_01
Fotopoulos C, Krystallis A, 2003. Quality labels as a marketing advantage. The case of the 'PDO Zagora' apples in Greek market. Eur J Mark 37(10): 1350-1374.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/03090560310487149
Frank CH, Nelson R, Simone E, Behe B, Simone A, 2001. Consumer preferences for color, price, and vitamin C content of bell peppers. HortSc 36: 795-800.
Gil JM, Sánchez M, 1997. Consumer preferences for wine attributes: a conjoint approach. Brit Food J 99(1): 3-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070709710158825
García M, Aragonés Z, Poole N, 2002. A repositioning strategy for olive oil in the UK market. Agrib 18(2): 163-180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.10016
Green P, Srinivasan V, 1978. Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. J Cons Res 5: 103-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208721
Green PE, Srinivasan V, 1990. Conjoint analysis in marketing: New developments with implications for research and practice. J Mark 54 (October): 3-19.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251756
Grossmann H, Brocke M, Holling H, 2007. A conjoint measurement based rationale for inducing preferences. In: Uncertainty and risk (Abdellaoui M, Luce RD, Machina MJ, Munier B, eds.). Springer, Berlin, pp: 243-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48935-1_14
Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC, 1998. Multivariate data analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (USA). 768 pp.
Halbrendt CK, Wirth EF, Vaughn GF, 1991. Conjoint analysis of the mid-atlantic food-fish market for farm-raised hybrid stripted bass. Sout J Agr Eco July: 155-163.
Henson S, Northen J, 2000. Consumer assessment of the safety of beef at the point of purchase: a pan-European study. J Agr Econ 51(1): 90-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2000.tb01211.x
Holland D, Wessells CR, 1998. Predicting consumer preferences for fresh salmon: The influence of safety inspection and production method attributes. Agr Res Eco Rev 27: 1-14.
Huang CH, Fu J, 1995. Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences and evaluations of a processed meat. J Int Food Agr Mark 7 (1): 35-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J047v07n01_03
Huber J, Ariely D, Fischer G, 2002. Expressing preferences in a principal-agent task: a comparison of choice, rating, and matching. Org Beh Hum Dec Proc 87(1): 66–90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2955
Huddleston P, Good L, Stoel L, 2000. Consumer ethnocentrism, product necessity and quality perceptions of Russian consumers. Int Rev Ret Dist Cons Res 10(2): 167-181.
ICEX, 2003. Frutas y verduras: cambio en las costumbres de consumo. Boletín de Noticias sobre el Mercado en Alemania 4. Spanish Trade Office in Dusseldorf
ICEX, 2011. Informes de ferias: Fruit Logística 2010. Feria Internacional de Frutas y Hortalizas. Spanish Trade Office in Dusseldorf. Available in http://www.icex.es/icex/cma/contentTypes/common/records/viewDocument/0,,,00.bin?doc=4332083.
Jaeger SR, Hedderley D, Mcfie HJ, 2001. Methodological issues in conjoint analysis: a case study. Eur J Mark 35(11/12): 1217-1237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000006474
Jamal A, Goode M, 2001. Consumers' product evaluation: a study of the primary evaluative criteria in the precious jewellery market in the UK. J Con Behav 1(2): 140-155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cb.61
Kotler P, Armstrong G, 2004. Principles of marketing, 11th ed. Pearson, 768 pp.
Krystallis A, Ness M, 2005. Consumer preferences for quality foods from a South European perspective: a conjoint analysis implementation on greek olive oil. Int Food Agr Manage Rev 8(2): 62-91.
Lappalainen R, Kearney J, Gibney M, 1998. A pan EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health: an overview. Food Qual Prefer 9(6): 467-478.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00018-4
Lee M, Lou YC, 1996. Consumer reliance on intrinsic and extrinsic cues in product evaluations: a conjoint approach. J App Bus Res 12(1): 21-29.
Lilien GL, Kotler P, 1983. Marketing decision making: a model-building approach. Harper & Row, NY, 875 pp.
Loader R, 1990. Conjoint analysis of fresh fruit purchasing: a report on a survey. Dept. Agr Econ, Univ Reading, UK.
Manalo AB, 1990. Assessing importance of apple attributes: an agricultural application of conjoint analysis. North J Agr Resour Econ 19: 118-124.
Menapace L, Colson G, Grebitus C, Facendola M, 2011. Consumers' preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. Eur Rev Agr Econ 38(2): 193-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq051
Montaner MP, Uzcanga M, 2007. El mercado de la alimentación ecológica en Alemania. Serie Estudios de Mercado. Oficina Económica y Comercial del Consulado General de España en Dusseldorf.
Múgica JM, 1989. Los modelos multiatributo en marketing: el análisis conjunto. IP-MARK 324: 63-71.
Murphy M, Cowan C, Henchion M, O'Reilly S, 2000. Irish consumer preferences for honey: a conjoint approach. Brit Food J 102(8): 585-597.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700010348424
Murphy M, Cowan C, Meehan H, O'Reilly S, 2004. A conjoint analysis of Irish consumer preferences for farmhouse cheese. Brit Food J 106(4): 288-300.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700410529555
Nelson, RG, Jolly C, Hunds M, Donis Y, Prophete E, 2005. Conjoint analysis of consumer preferences for roasted peanut products in Haiti. Int J Consum Stud 29: 208-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00388.x
Ness M, Gerhardy H, 1994. Consumer preferences for quality and freshness attributes of eggs. Brit Food J 96: 26-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070709410060808
Orth H, Firbasova Z, 2003. The role of consumer ethnocentrism in food product evaluation. Agrib 19(2): 137-153.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/agr.10051
Olson JC, Jacoby J, 1972. Cue utilization in the quality perception process. Proc 3rd Ann Conf Assoc Cons Res, Iowa City (USA). pp: 167-179.
Papadopoulos N, Heslop LA, 2003. Country equity and product-country images: state-of-the-art in research and implications. In: Handbook of research in international marketing (Jain SC, ed.). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp: 402–433.
Pharr JM, 2005. Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade: is the concept still salient in an era of global brands? J Mark Th & Prac 13(4): 34–45.
Ragaert P, Verbeke W, Devlieghere F, Debevere J, 2004. Consumer perception and choice of minimally processed vegetables and packaged fruits. Food Qual Prefer 15(3): 259-270.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00066-1
Raghavarao D, Wiley JB, Chitturi P, 2011. Choice-based conjoint analysis. Models and designs. Ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC (Taylor & Francis Group). 192 pp.
Richardson PS, Dick AS, Jain AK, 1994. Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality. J Mark 58(October): 28-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1251914
Riquelme F, Roca MA, 2000. Introducción de tecnologías en el control de calidad de hortalizas, frutas y cítricos. FECOAM/Consejería de Agricultura, Agua y Medio Ambiente. Región de Murcia.
Rivera LM, 1995. Nuevas estrategias en publicidad agraria y alimentaria. Agricultura: Revista Agropecuaria [Esp] 752: 247-251.
Rivera LM, Brugarolas M, 2003. Estrategias comerciales para los productos ecológicos. Dist Cons 67: 15-22.
Rodríguez RM, 2003. El país de origen como elemento de ventaja competitiva en el marketing internacional. Esic Market 111: 113-134.
Ruiz S, Munuera JL, 1993. Las preferencias del consumidor: Estudio de su composición a través del análisis conjunto. Est Cons 28: 27-44.
Sánchez M, Gil JM, 1998. Comparación de tres métodos de estimación del análisis conjunto: diferencias en las preferencias en el consumo de vino y en la segmentación del mercado. Estud Econ Apl 10: 131-146.
Sánchez M, Barrena R, 2000. Importancia de la diferenciación del producto en mercados de similar implicación y distinto riesgo percibido por el consumidor. Proc XII Encuentros de Profesores Universitarios de Marketing. Santiago de Compostela (Spain), 25-26 September.
Sánchez M, Grande I, Gil JM, Gracia A, 1998. Evolución del potencial de mercado de los productos de agricultura ecológica. Rev Esp Invest Mark ESIC 2: 135-150.
Sánchez M, Gil JM, Gracia A, 2000. Segmentación del consumidor respecto al alimento ecológico: diferencias interregionales. Rev Est Reg 56: 171-188.
Sánchez M, Grande I, Gil JM, Gracia A, 2001a. Diferencias entre los segmentos del mercado en la disposición a pagar por un alimento ecológico: valoración contingente y análisis conjunto. Rev Estud Agrosoc Pesqu 190: 141-163.
Sánchez M, Sanjuán A, Akl G, 2001b. El distintivo de calidad como indicador de seguridad alimenticia en carne de vacuno y cordero. Rev Econ Agr Recurs Nat 1: 77-94.
Segura P, Calafat M, 2001. El nuevo modelo de consumo de frutas y hortalizas. Análisis socioeconómico. Proc IV Cong Nac de Economía Agraria, Pamplona (Spain).
Sloan AE, 1999. Top ten trends to watch and work on for the millennium. Food Technol 53(8): 40-60.
Sloan AE, 2003. Top 10 trends to watch and work on. Food Technol 57(4): 30-50.
Slovic P, 1995. The construction of preference. Am Psyc 50: 364–371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.5.364
Solomon M, Bamossy G, Askegaard S, 1999. Consumer behaviour. a european perspective, Prentice Hall Europe, Barcelona. 589 pp.
Souza D, Ventura MR, 2001. Conjoint measurement of preferences for traditional cheeses in Lisbon. Brit Food J 103: 414-424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070700110400406
Srinivasan N, Jain SC, 2003. Country of origin effect: synthesis and future. In: Handbook of research in international marketing (Jain SC, ed.). Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (UK), pp: 458–476.
Steenkamp JB, 1987. Conjoint measurement in ham quality evaluation. J Agr Econ 38: 473-480.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1987.tb01065.x
Steenkamp JB, 1997. Dynamics in consumer behaviour with respect to agricultural and food products. In: Agricultural marketing and consumer behaviour in a changing world (Wierenga B et al., eds.). Kluwer Acad Publ, Boston, pp: 143-188.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6273-3_8
Supphellen M, Rittenburg T, 2001. Consumer ethnocentrism when foreign products are better. Psychol Market 18: 907-927.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.1035
Van der Lans IA, Van Ittersum K, De Cicco A, Loseby M, 2001. The role of the region of origin and EU certificates of origin in consumer evaluation of food products. Eur Rev Agr Econ 28(4): 451-477.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/erae/28.4.451
Van Der Pol M, Ryan M, 1996. Using conjoint analysis to establish consumer preferences for fruit and vegetables. Brit Food J 98: 5-12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070709610150879
Walley K, Parsons S, Bland M, 1999. Quality assurance and the consumer: a conjoint study. Brit Food J 101(2): 148-161.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00070709910261936
Zepeda L, Douthitt R, You S, 2003. Consumer risk perceptions toward agricultural biotechnology, self-protection, and food demand: the case of milk in the United States. Risk Anal 23(5): 973-984.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1539-6924.00374
PMid:12969412
Zind T, 1990. Fresh trends 1990: a profile of fresh produce consumers. In: The packer focus 1989-90. Vance Publishing Co., Overland Park, KS, USA, pp: 37-68.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
