Short communication. Management of Macrophomina root rot of mungbean using dry leaves manure of Datura metel as soil amendment

  • A. Javaid Institute of Agricultural Sciences. University of the Punjab. Quaid-e-Azam Campus. Lahore. Pakistan
  • A. Saddique Institute of Agricultural Sciences. University of the Punjab. Quaid-e-Azam Campus. Lahore. Pakistan
Keywords: leaf residue, medicinal plants, natural fungicides, Vigna radiata

Abstract

The antifungal activity of leaves of Datura metel for in vitro and in vivo management of Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of root rot in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek], was studied. In a laboratory bioassay, methanolic extracts of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5 g/100 mL significantly reduced the fungal biomass by 36-47%. In a pot trial, dried powdered leaves of D. metel were mixed in soil at 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5% (w/w) with soil already inoculated with the target fungal pathogen. A negative control without fungal inoculation and leaf amendment, and a positive control with M. phaseolina inoculation only, were used for reference. Plant mortality due to M. phaseolina inoculation was significantly reduced by 42% and 80% due to 1.0 and 1.5% dry leaves amendments, respectively, as compared to positive control. There was a gradual increase in root and shoot growth of the plants with increase in dose of soil amendment. Generally, 1.5% dose significantly enhanced root and shoot growth as compared to positive control. M. phaseolina root rot in mungbean can effectively be managed by amending the soil with 1.5% dry leaf manure of D. metel.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmadzadeh Z., Hatami B., 2006. Evaluation of integrated control of greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum West. using Chrysoperla carnea (Steph.) and insecticide Confidor in greenhouse conditions. J Sci Tech Agri Nat Resour 9(4), 239-251.

Asiimwe P., Ecaat J.S., Otim M., Gerling D., Kyamanywa S., Legg J.P., 2006. Life table analysis of mortality factors affecting populations of Bemisia tabaci on cassava in Uganda. Entomol Exp Appl 122, 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00487.x

Bethke J.A., Redak R.A., 1997. Effect of imidacloprid on the silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), and whitefly parasitism. Ann Appl Biol 130, 397-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1997.tb07670.x

Birnie L.C., Denholm I., 1992. Field simulators: a novel approach to evaluating the impact of pesticides on eneficial arthropods in the laboratory. Aspect Appl Bi 31, 105-112.

Breene R.G., Dean D.A., Quarles W., 1994. Predators of sweetpotato whitefly. IPM Practitioner 16, 1-8.

De Oliveira M.R.V., Amanico E., Laumann R.A., Gomes L.D.O., 2003. Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) B biotype and Trialeurodes vaporariorum (Westwood) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Brasilia, Brazil. Neotrop Entomol 32(1), 151-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2003000100023

Devine G.J., Wright D.J., Denholm I., 2000. A parasitic wasp (Eretmocerus mundus Mercet) can exploit chemically induced delays in the development rates of its whitefly host (Bemisia tabaci Genn.). Biol Control 19, 64-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0844

Gerling D., Alomar O., Arno J., 2001. Biological control of Bemisia tabaci using predators and parasitoids. Crop Prot 20, 779-799. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00111-9

González-Zamora J.E., Leira D., Bellido M.J., Avilla C., 2004. Evaluation of the effect of different insecticides on the survival and capacity of Eretmocerus mundus Mercet to control Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) populations. Crop Prot 23, 611-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2003.11.011

Goolsby J., Ciomperlink M.A., Legaspi B.C., Legaspi J.C.,Wendel L.E., 1998. Laboratory and field evaluation of exotic parasitoids of Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Biotype «B») (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Biol Control 12, 127-135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bcon.1998.0624

Gould J.R., Bellows T.S., Paine T.R., 1992. Population dynamics of Siphoninus phillyreae in California in the presence and absence of a parasitoid, Encarsia partenopea.Ecol Entomol 17, 127-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.1992.tb01169.x

Hassan S.A., 1992. Guidelines for testing the effects of pesticides on beneficial organisms. Descriptions of test methods. Bull IOBC/WPRS 15, 18-39.

Hassan S.A., 1994. Activities of the IOBC/WPRS working group, pesticides and beneficial organisms. Bull IOBC/WPRS 17, 1-5.

Heinz K.M., Parrella M.P., 1998. Host location and utilization by selected parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae): implications for augmentative biological control. Environ Entomol 27, 773-784.

Hoseini S.A., Pourmirza A.A., 2010. Impacts of pyriproxyfen on the efficacy of Encarsia inaronWalker (Hym:Aphelinidae) on control of Trialeurodes vaporariorum Westwood (Hom: Aleyrodidae). Mun Ent Zool 5,119-1124.

Hull L.A., Beers E.H., 1985. Ecological selectivity: modifying chemical control practices to preserve natural enemies. In: Biological control in agricultural IPM systems (Hoy M.A., Herzog D.C., eds). Academic Press, NY. pp. 103-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-357030-7.50013-2

Jones W.A., Greenberg S.M., Legaspi B., 1999. The effect of varying Bemisia argentifolii and Eretmocerus mundus ratios on parasitism. Biocontrol 44, 13-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009992421012

Karut K., Naranjo S.E., 2009. Mortality factors affecting Bemisia tabaci populations on cotton the Çukurova plain. Turkey J Appl Entomol 133, 367- 374. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2008.01369.x

Naranjo S.E., Ellsworth P.C., 2005. Mortality dynamics and population regulation in Bemisia tabaci. Entomol Exp Appl 116, 93-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2005.00297.x

Naranjo S.E., Ellsworth P.C., 2009. The contribution of conservation biological control to integrated control of Bemisia tabaci in cotton. Biol Control 51, 458-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2009.08.006

Perlman S.J., Kelly S.E., Zchori-Fein E., Hunter M.S., 2006. Cytoplasmic incompatibility and multiple symbiont infection in the ash whitefly parasitoid, Encarsia inaron. Biol Control 39, 474-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.05.015

Pickett C.H., Pitcairn M.J., 1999. Classical biological control of ash whitefly: factors contributing to its success in California. BioControl 44, 143-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009907826562

Pickett C.H., Wall R., 2003. Biological control of ash whitefly Siphoninus phillyreae (Haliday) (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae) by Encarsia inaron (Walker) (Hymenoptera:Aphelinidae) in Northern California:1990-2000. Pan-Pacific Entomol 79, 156-158.

Rebek E.J., Sadof C.S., 2003. Effects of pesticide applications on the Euonymus Scale (Homoptera:Diaspididae) and its parasitoid, Encarsia citrina (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). J Econ Entomol 96(2), 446-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-0493-96.2.446 PMid:14994813

Sheikhi Garjan A., Najafi H., Abbasi S., Saber F., Rashid M., 2009. The pesticide guide of Iran 2009. Paytakht Book Press, Tehran. 237 pp. [In Persian]. PMid:20218524

Simmons A.M., Jackson D.M., 2000. Evaluation of foliarapplied insecticides on abundance of parasitoids of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) in vegetables. J Entomol Sci 35, 1-8.

Slobodyanyuk G.A., Ignat'eva T.N., Andreenko O.N., 1993. A system of protection of cucumbers against greenhouse whitefly. Zashch Rast 4, 45.

Talebi Jahromi K., 2008. Pesticide toxicology. Univ Tehran Press, Tehran. 492 pp. [In Persian].

Van Driesche R., Hoddle M.S., Lyon S., Sanderson J., 2001. Compatibility of insect growth regulators with Eretmocerus eremicus (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for whitefly (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) control on poinsettias:II trials in commercial poinsettia crops. Biol Control 20, 132-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bcon.2000.0886

How to Cite
Javaid, A., & Saddique, A. (1). Short communication. Management of Macrophomina root rot of mungbean using dry leaves manure of Datura metel as soil amendment. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 9(3), 901-905. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110903-394-10
Section
Plant protection