Limitations to adopting regulated deficit irrigation in stone fruit orchards: a case study
Abstract
Fruit production development is resulting in large commercial orchards with improved water management standards. While the agronomic and economic benefits of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) have long been established, the local variability in soils and climate and the irrigation system design limits its practical applications. This paper uses a case study approach (a 225 ha stone fruit orchard) to unveil limitations derived from environmental spatial variability and irrigation performance. The spatial variability of soil physical parameters and meteorology in the orchard was characterized, and its implication on crop water requirements was established. Irrigation depths applied during 2004-2009 were analysed and compared with crop water requirements under standard and RDI strategies. Plant water status was also measured during two irrigation seasons using stem water potential measurements. On-farm wind speed variability amounted to 55%, representing differences of 17% in reference evapotranspiration. During the study seasons, irrigation scheduling evolved towards deficit irrigation; however, the specific traits of RDI in stone fruits were not implemented. RDI implementation was limited by: 1) poor correspondence between environmental variability and irrigation system design; 2) insufficient information on RDI crop water requirements and its on-farm spatial variability within the farm; and 3) low control of the water distribution network.Downloads
References
Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrig Drain paper No. 56, Rome, Italy.
Antunez-Barria AJ, 2006. The impact of deficit irrigation strategies on sweet cherry (Prunus avium L) physiology and spectral reflectance. PhD Diss., Washington State Univ (UMI Microform 3252310).
Arzadi K, Wood D, Lawes S, 2000. Influence of first season application of paclobutrazol root-pruning and regulated deficit irrigation on second season flowering and fruiting of mature Sundrop apricot trees. XXV Int Hortic Cong Proc - Pt 6 - Culture techniques with special emphasis on environmental implications physiological processes in plants, pp: 75-82.
Bleiholder H, van den Boom T, Langeluddeke P. and Stauss R, 1989. Einheitliche Codierung der phänologischen Stadien bei Kultur-und Schadpflanzen. Gesunde Pflanzen 41: 381–384.
Boland AM, Bewsell D, Kaine G, 2006. Adoption of sustainable irrigation management practices by stone and pome fruit growers in the Goulburn/Murray Valleys, Australia. Irrig Sci 24(2): 137-145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0017-5
Burt C, 2004. Rapid field evaluation of drip and microspray distribution uniformity. Irrig Drain Syst 18: 275–297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10795-004-2751-x
Cachuma RCD, 1994. Final Report. Irrigation Water Management Program Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo Counties. Cachuma Resource Conservation District, Santa Maria, CA, USA.
Cameron RWF, Harrison-Murray RS, Atkinson CJ, Judd HL, 2006. Regulated deficit irrigation - a means to control growth in woody ornamentals. J Hortic Sci Biotech 81(3): 435-443.
Chalmers DJ, Mitchell PD, van Heek L, 1981. Control of peach tree growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density and summer pruning. J Am Soc Hort Sci 106: 307–312.
Clemmens AJ, Dedrick AR, 1994. Irrigation techniques and evaluations. Adv Series Agric Sci (Tanji KK & Yaron B, eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp: 64-103.
Clemmens AJ, Solomon KH, 1997. Estimation of global irrigation distribution uniformity. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 123(6): 454–461.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1997)123:6(454)
Dastane NG, 1978. Effective rainfall in irrigated agriculture. Irrig Drain Paper 25. FAO, Rome, Italy.
Dejong TM, Doyle JF, Day KR, 1987. Seasonal patterns of reproductive and vegetative sink activity in early and late maturing peach (Prunus persica) cultivars. Physiol Plantarum 71: 83-88.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1987.tb04621.x
Derrick A, 1993. Development of the measure-correlate-predict strategy for site assessment. Eur Comm Wind Energy Conf, Lübeck-Travemünde, Germany. 8-12 March.
Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Sofo A, Montanaro G, 2007. Effects of post-harvest regulated deficit irrigation on carbohydrate and nitrogen partitioning, yield quality and vegetative growth of peach trees. Plant Soil 290(1-2): 127-137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11104-006-9144-x
Fereres E, Soriano MA, 2007. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58(2): 147-159.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl165
PMid:17088360
Fulton A, Schwankl L, Lynn K, Lampinen B, Edstrom J, Prichard T 2011, Using EM and VERIS technology to assess land suitability for orchard and vineyard development. Irrig Sci 29(6): 497-512.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0253-1
García-Vera M, Martínez-Cob A, 2004. Revisión de las necesidades hídricas netas de los cultivos de la Cuenca del Ebro. Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro (2004-PH-12.I).
Gelly M, Recasens I, Girona J, Mata M, Arbones A, Rufat J, Marsal J, 2004. Effects of stage II and postharvest deficit irrigation on peach quality during maturation and after cold storage. J Sci Food Agr 84(6): 561-568.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.1686
Girona J, Mata M, Arbones A, Alegre S, Rufat J, Marsal J, 2003. Peach tree response to single and combined regulated deficit irrigation regimes under shallow soils. J Am Soc Hort Sci 128(3): 432-440.
Girona J, Gelly M, Mata M, Arbonés A, Rufat J, Marsal J, 2005. Peach tree response to single and combined deficit irrigation regimes in deep soils. Agric Water Manage 72: 97-108.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.011
Goldhamer DA, Salinas M, Crisosto C, Day KR, Soler M, Moriana A, 2002. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying on late harvest peach tree performance. Proc 5th Int Peach Symp, Vols 1 and 2, pp: 343-350.
Hanks RJ, 1992. Applied soil physics. Soil water and temperature applications. Springer-Verlag, NY, 176 pp.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2938-4
Hanson B, Bowers W, Davidoff B, Kasapligil D, Carvajal A, Bendixen W, 1996. Field performance of microirrigation systems. Proc Fifth Int Microirrigation Cong, Orlando, FL, USA, pp: 769–774.
Johnson RS, Handley DF, DeJong TM, 1992. Long-term response of early maturing peach trees to postharvest water deficits. J Am Soc Hort Sci 117: 881–886.
Lecina S, Playán E, Isidoro D, Dechmi F, Causapé J, Faci JM, 2005. Irrigation evaluation and simulation at the irrigation District V of Bardenas (Spain). Agric Water Manage 73(3): 223-245.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.10.007
López G, Arbones A, del Campo J, Mata M, Vallverdu X, Girona J, Marsal J, 2008. Response of peach trees to regulated deficit irrigation during stage II of fruit development and summer pruning. Span J Agric Res 6(3): 479-491.
Marsal J, López G, Mata M, Arbones A, Girona J, 2004. Recommendations for water conservation in peach orchards in Mediterranean climate zones using combined regulated deficit irrigation. Proc IVth Int Symp on Irrigation of Horticultural Crops, pp: 391-397.
Marsal J, López G, Girona J, Basile B, DeJong TM, 2005. Heterogeneity in fruit distribution and stem water potential variations in peach trees under different irrigation conditions. J Hortic Sci Biotech 80(1): 82-86.
Marsal J, López G, del Campo J, Mata M, Arbones A, Girona J, 2009. Postharvest regulated deficit irrigation in Summit sweet cherry: fruit yield and quality in the following season. Irrig Sci 28: 181-189.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-009-0174-z
Martínez-Cob A, Tejero-Juste M, 2004. A wind-based qualitative calibration of the Hargreaves ETo estimation equation in semiarid regions. Agric Water Manage 64(3), 251-264.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(03)00199-9
Martínez-Cob A, Zapata N, Sánchez I, 2010. Viento y riego: la variabilidad del viento en Aragón y su influencia en el riego por aspersión. Publication No. 2948. Series Studies (Geography). Institución Fernando el Católico. Zaragoza, Spain. 200 pp.
McCutchan M, Shackel KA, 1992. Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. 'Franch'). J ASHS 117: 607–611.
Merriam JL, Keller J, Alfaro JF, 1973. Irrigation systems evaluation and improvement. Agric Irrig Eng Dept, Utah State Univ, Logan, UT, USA.
PMCid:1310484
Mitchell PD, Chalmers DJ, 1982. The effects of reduced water supply on peach tree growth and yields. J Am Soc Hort Sci 107: 853-856.
Mitchell PD, Chalmers DJ, Jerie PH, Burge G, 1986. the use of initial withholding of irrigation and tree spacing to enhance the effect of regulated deficit irrigation on pear trees. J Am Soc Hort Sci 111(6): 858-861.
Naor A, 2006. Irrigation scheduling of peach-deficit irrigation at different phenological stages and water stress assessment. Acta Hort 713: 393-399.
Papenfuss KA, Black BL, 2010. regulated deficit irrigation of 'Montmorency' Tart cherry. Hortsci 45(10): 1437-1440.
Perez-Pastor A, Domingo R, Torrecillas A, Ruiz-Sanchez M, 2009. Response of apricot trees to deficit irrigation strategies. Irrig Sci 27(3): 231-242.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0136-x
Perez-Sarmiento F, Alcobendas R, Mounzer O, Alarcon J, Nicolas E, 2010. Effects of regulated deficit irrigation on physiology and fruit quality in apricot trees. Span J Agric Res 8(S2): S86-S94.
Playán E, Slatni A, Castillo R, Faci JM, 2000. A case study for irrigation modernisation: II Scenario analysis. Agric Water Manage 42(3): 335-354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00051-7
Salvador R, Martínez-Cob A, Cavero J, Playán E, 2011. Seasonal on-farm irrigation performance in the Ebro basin (Spain): crops and irrigation systems. Agric Water Manage 98(2011): 577-587.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.003
Sánchez I, Zapata N, Faci JM, Martínez-Cob A, 2011. Wind spatial variability in a sprinkler irrigated district: implications for irrigation management. Biosyst Eng 109(1): 65-75.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.02.003
Snyder RL, Ferreira MI, Shackel KA, 2000. A crop coefficient model for trees and vines. Proc Third Int Symp Irrig Hortic Crops, Leuven 1, ISHS, Vols 1 and 2, pp: 549-556.
Torrecillas A, Domingo R, Galego R, Ruiz-Sanchez MC, 2000. Apricot tree response to withholding irrigation at different phenological periods. Sci Hortic 85(3): 201-215.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00146-6
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
