Effect of dry period length on the subsequent production and reproduction in Holstein cows

  • N. Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht
  • A. Mohit Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Guilan, Rasht
Keywords: dairy cow, dry days, productive performance, reproductive performance

Abstract

Calving records of Holstein cows from January 1983 to December 2006 comprising 1,190 herds with 384,717 calving events were used to evaluate factors affecting the dry period length and effect of current dry days on the next productive and reproductive performances of Holstein cows. Statistical analyses of dry days, productive and reproductive traits in this study were performed as linear mixed models. Dry period length (DD) of cows was grouped into 14 classes from 130 days. Average DD was 100.46 days in Holstein cows. Primiparous cows had the lowest DD and the mean of DD decreased over the years from 1983 to 2006 and summer calvers had the shortest DD (p <0.001). Cows within the DD classes of 51-60 and 61-70 had the greatest actual milk yield, mature equivalent milk yield, adjusted milk yield, adjusted fat yield, mature equivalent milk yield, adjusted protein yield and mature equivalent protein yield (p <0.05). Also, cows within the DD class of 0-10 had the greatest adjusted fat percentage, mature equivalent fat percentage and adjusted protein percentage (p <0.05). Our current results showed a reduction in calving interval and age at calving after cows had shorter dry days than with other longer dry period lengths (p <0.05). Given the recent advocacy for shortened dry periods, it is worthwhile to emphasize that 51 to 70 DD does provide maximal performance in Holstein cows.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amasaib EO, Fadel-Elseed AM, Mahala AG, Fadlelmoula AA, 2011. Seasonal and parity effects on some performance and reproductive characteristics of crossbred dairy cows raised under tropical conditions of the Sudan. Livest Res Rural Dev 23(4): http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/amas23078.htm. 

Andersen JB, Madsen TG, Larsen T, Ingvartsen KL, Nielsen MO, 2005. The effects of dry period versus continuous lactation on metabolic status and performance in periparturient cows. J Dairy Sci 88: 3530–3541.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73038-1 

Annen EL, Collier RJ, McGuire MA, Vicini JL, Ballam JM, Lormore MJ, 2004. Effect of modified dry period lengths and bovine somatotropin on yield and composition of milk from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 87: 3746–3761.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73513-4 

Bachman KC, 2002. Milk production of dairy cows treated with estrogen at the onset of a short dry period. J Dairy Sci 85: 797–803.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74138-6 

Borkowska D, Januś E, Malinowska K, 2006. Zależność pomiędzy długością okresu zasuszenia krów a ich produkcyjnością w następnej laktacji. Rocz Nauk PTZ 2(3): 27–32. 

Capuco AV, Akers RM, Smith JJ, 1997. Mammary growth in Holstein cows during the dry period: Quantification of nucleic acids and histology. J Dairy Sci 80: 477–487.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)75960-5 

Degaris PJ, Lean IJ, Rabieee AR, Heuer C, 2008. Effects of increasing days of exposure to prepartum transition diets on milk production and milk composition in dairy cows. Aust Vet J 86: 341–351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00335.x
PMid:18782415  

Dias FM, Allaire FR, 1982. Dry period to maximize milk production over two consecutive lactations. J Dairy Sci 65: 136–145.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(82)82162-0 

Funk DA, Freeman AE, Berger PJ, 1987. Effects of pervious days open, previous days dry, and present days open on lactation yield. J Dairy Sci 70: 2366–2373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80297-7 

Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N, Nejati-Javaremi A, Miraei-Ashtiani SR, Kohram H, 2009. Estimation of variance components and genetic trends for twinning rate in Holstein dairy cattle of Iran. J Dairy Sci 92: 3411–3421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1631
PMid:19528619  

Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh N, Ardalan M, 2011. Evaluation of the potential effects of abortion on the productive performance of Iranian Holstein dairy cows. Anim Sci J 82: 117-121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2010.00802.x
PMid:21269369  

Grummer RR, 2007. Strategies to improve fertility of high yielding dairy farms: Management of the dry period. Theriogenology 68S (S1): S281–S288.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2007.04.031
PMid:17524468  

Grummer RR, Rastani RR, 2004. Why re-evaluate dry period length? J Dairy Sci 87: E77–E85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70063-6 

Gulay MS, Hayen MJ, Bachman KC, Belloso T, Liboni M, Head HH, 2003. Milk production and feed intake of Holstein cows given short (30-d) or normal (60-d) dry periods. J Dairy Sci 86: 2030–2038.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73792-8 

Gulay MS, Hayen MJ, Head HH, Wilcox CJ, Bachman KC, 2005. Milk production from Holstein half udders after concurrent thirty- and seventy-day dry periods. J Dairy Sci 88: 3953-3962.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73081-2 

Ishag IA, 2000. Impact of genetics and non genetic factors in productive and reproductive traits of crossbred cows raised under Sudan condition. MVSC thesis, University of Khartoum, Sudan.  

Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, 2005. Methodology for estimation of days dry effects. J Dairy Sci 88: 1499–1508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72818-6 

Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, 2005a. Characterization of days dry in US Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 88: 1147–1155.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72781-8 

Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, 2005b. Minimum days dry to maximize milk yield in subsequent lactation. Anim Res 54: 351–367.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/animres:2005031 

Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, 2006. Effects of length of dry period on yields of milk fat and protein, fertility and milk somatic cell score in the subsequent lactation of dairy cows. J Dairy Res 73: 154–162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022029905001597
PMid:16476176  

Kuhn MT, Hutchison JL, Norman HD, 2007. Dry period length in US Jerseys: Characterization and effects on performance. J Dairy Sci 90: 2069–2081.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-702
PMid:17369250  

Madsen TG, Andersen JB, Ingvartsen KL, Nielsen MO, 2004. Continuous lactation in dairy cows: Effects on feed intake, milk production and mammary nutrient extraction. J Anim Feed Sci 13: 503–506. 

Musa LMA, Ahmed MKA, Peters KJ, Zumbach B, Gubartalla KAE, 2005. The reproductive and milk performance merit of Butana cattle in Sudan. Arch Tierz 48: 445-459. 

Pezeshki A, Mehrzad J, Ghorbani GR, Rahmani HR, Collier RJ, Burvenich C, 2007. Effects of short dry periods on performance and metabolic status in Holstein dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 90: 5531–5541.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2007-0359
PMid:18024744  

Pytlewski J, Antkowiak I, Skrzypek R, Kęsy K, 2009. The effect of dry period length on milk performance traits of Black and White Polish Holstein-Friesian and Jersey cows. Ann Anim Sci 9: 341–353. 

Rastani RR, Grummer RR, Bertics SJ, Gümen A, Wiltbank MC, Mashek DG, Schwab MC, 2005. Reducing dry period length to simplify feeding transition cows: milk production, energy balance, and metabolic profiles. J Dairy Sci 88: 1004–1014.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72768-5 

Rémond B, Ollier A, Miranda G, 1992. Milking of cows in late pregnancy: Milk production during this period and during the succeeding lactation. J Dairy Res 59: 233–241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S002202990003051X
PMid:1401350  

Rémond B, Rouel J, Pinson N, Jabet S, 1997. An attempt to omit the dry period over three consecutive lactations in dairy cows. Ann Zootech 46: 399–408.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/animres:19970502 

SAS, 2002. SAS User's guide v. 9.1: Statistics. SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA. 

Stanton TL, Jones LR, Everett RW, Kachman SD, 1992. Estimating milk, fat, and protein lactation curves with a test day model. J Dairy Sci 75: 1691–1700.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77926-0 

Stockdale CR, 2006. Reducing or eliminating the dry period of dairy cows. Aust J Exp Agric 46: 957–963.http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/EA05304 

Şükrü Gülay M, 2005. Altering the lactation cycle: Is a 60-day dry period too long? Turk J Vet Anim Sci 29: 197-205. 

Watters RD, Wiltbank MC, Guenther JN, Brickner AE, Rastani RR, Fricke PM, Grummer RR, 2009. Effect of dry period length on reproduction during the subsequent lactation. J Dairy Sci 92: 3081–3090.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1294
PMid:19528586  

Węglarzy K, 2009. Lactation productivity of dairy cows as affected by the length of preceding dry period. Anim Sci Pap Rep 27: 303-310. 

Welper RD, Freeman AE, 1992. Genetic parameters for yield traits of Holsteins including lactose and somatic cell score. J Dairy Sci 75: 1342–1348.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)77885-0 

Winnicki S, Głowicka-Wołoszyn R, Helak B, Dolska M, Jugowa JL, 2008. Effect of a dry period length on milk production and quality in next lactation. Prace i materiały Zootechniczne 67: S176.

Published
2013-01-24
How to Cite
Ghavi Hossein-Zadeh, N., & Mohit, A. (2013). Effect of dry period length on the subsequent production and reproduction in Holstein cows. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 11(1), 100-108. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013111-3165
Section
Animal production