Leaf blade and petiole nutritional diagnosis for Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo by deviation from optimum percentage method
Abstract
Deviation from optimum percentage (DOP) is a diagnosis methodology for leaf analyses which expresses the deviation for each element with respect to its optimal concentration. This deviation is an individual index for each nutrient and allows the sorting of all the analyzed nutrients according to their limitations. A nutritional survey was undertaken over eleven years in La Rioja (Spain), to establish reference concentrations for the nutritional diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L., cv. ‘Tempranillo’ grafted on Richter-110. Reference concentrations for DOP methodology are proposed, and sensibility for the nutritional diagnosis was evaluated for blade and petiole analysis of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, and B at flowering and veraison phenological stages by comparison between DOP and sufficiency ranges (SR) methods. Results suggest that petiole has lower sensibility than blade to detect deficiencies or excesses of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Mn at veraison. In addition, petiole is a better tissue than blade to detect Fe and B deficiencies or excesses. Therefore, our results make possible the right choice between tissues, leaf blade or petiole, for a general nutritional diagnosis of ‘Tempranillo’ grapevines. On the other hand, it is possible to evaluate the status of each nutrient in each phonological stage analyzing both tissues and comparing the nutrient status to its references, DOP or SR, in the most adequate tissue.Downloads
References
Benito A, Romero I, Domínguez N, García-Escudero E, Martín I, 2013. Leaf blade and petiole analysis for nutrient diagnosis in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Garnacha tinta. Aust J Grape Wine R 19: 285-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajgw.12022
Bonilla I, Cadahia C, Carpena O, Hernando V, 1980. Effects of boron on nitrogen metabolism and sugar levels of sugar beet. Plant Soil 57: 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02139636
Christensen P, 1984. Nutrient level comparison of leaf petioles and blades in twenty-six grape cultivars over three years (1979 through 1981). Am J Enol Vitic 35: 124-133.
Ciesielska J, Malusa E, Bourlot G, 2002. Grape leaf diagnosis in the Piedmont Region. Acta Hort 594: 387-392.
Cook JA, Kishaba T, 1956. Petiole nitrate analysis as a criterion of nitrogen needs in California vineyards. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 68: 131-140.
Failla O, Stringari G, Porro D, Scienza A, 1993. Determination of leaf standards for apple trees and grapevines in northern Italy. In: Optimization of plant nutrition (Fragoso MAC, Beusichem ML, eds.). Kluwer Acad Publ, Dordrecht (Netherlands), pp: 37-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2496-8_7
Failla O, Scienza A, Stringari G, Porro D, Tarducci S, Di Dionisio A, 1995. Indagine sullo stato nutrizionale dei vigneti in alcune zone toscane a denominazione d'origine per una proposta d'interpretazione delle analisi fogliari e del terreno. VigneVini, Supl 12: 15-25.
Failla O, Bogoni M, Porro D, Stringari G, 1997. Soil and leaf analysis: Effect of pedo-climatic, cultural and genetic factors on their calibration and interpretation. Acta Hort 448: 225-232.
Fráguas JC, Miele A, Silva EB, 2003. Grapevine nutritional diagnosis methods for the "Serra Gauchá" viticultural region, Brazil. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 1: 15–21.
García-Escudero E, Romero I, Benito A, Dominguez N, Martín I, 2013. Reference levels for leaf nutrient diagnosis of cv. 'Tempranillo' grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in the Rioja Appellation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 44: 645–654. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2013.745385
Hoenig M, Baeten H, Vanhentenrijk S, Vassileva E, Quevauviller P, 1998. Critical discussion on the need for an efficient mineralization procedure for the analysis of plant material by atomic spectrometric methods. Anal Chim Acta 358: 85-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-2670(97)00594-1
Horneck DA, Miller RO, 1998. Determination of total nitrogen in plant tissue. In: Handbook of methods for plant analysis (Kalra YP, Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (USA). pp: 75-84.
Loue A, 1990. Le diagnostic foliaire (ou pétiolaire) dans les enquêtes de nutrition minérale des vignes. Prog Agric Vitic 107: 439-453.
Lucena JJ, 1997. Methods of diagnosis of mineral nutrition of plants. A critical review. Acta Hort 448: 179-192.
Monge E, Monta-és L, Val J, Sanz M, 1995. A comparative study of the DOP and the DRIS methods, for evaluating the nutritional status of peach trees. Acta Hort 383: 191-199.
Monta-és L, Heras L, Abadía J, Sanz M, 1993. Plant analysis interpretation based on a new index: deviation from optimum percentage (DOP). J Plant Nutr 16: 1289-1308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01904169309364613
Mourao Filho FAA, 2004. DRIS: concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops. Sci Agr 61: 550-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162004000500015
Robinson JB, 2005. Critical plant tissue values and application of nutritional standards for practical use in vineyards. Proc Soil Mineral Environment and Vine Nutrition Symposium, San Diego, CA (USA), June 29–30, 2004. (Christensen LP, Smart, DR, eds.). ASEV, Davis, CA (USA). pp: 61-68.
Romero I, García-Escudero E, Martín I, 2010. Effects of leaf position on blade and petiole mineral nutrient concentration of Tempranillo grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Am J Enol Vitic 61(4): 544-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2010.09091
Romero I, García-Escudero E, Martín I, 2013. Leaf blade vs. petiole analysis for nutritional diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo. Am J Enol Vitic 64(1): 50–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2012.11004
Sumner ME, 1977. Application of Beaufil's diagnostic indices to maize data published in the literature irrespective of age and conditions. Plant Soil 46: 359-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00010092
Tardaguila J, Bertamini M, Giulivo C, Scienza A, 1995. Rootstock effects on growth, dry weight partitioning and mineral nutrient concentration of grapevine. Acta Hort 388: 111-116.
Walworth JL, Sumner ME, 1987. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS). Adv Soil Sci 6: 149-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4682-4_4
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
