Comparing welfare indicators in dairy cattle under different loose housing systems (deep litter vs cubicle barns) using recycled manure solids for bedding
Abstract
Aim of study: Dairy farmers in Southern Spain are continuously investing in the modernization of their facilities and frequently ask technicians about the type of housing they should choose for their farms. Although some studies have analysed the economic impact of different housing systems, there are no reports evaluating the impact of these systems on animal wellbeing. To remedy this deficit, a study was carried out to analyse animal welfare status in two types of loose housing conditions: deep litter (DL) and cubicle (CU) barns.
Area of study: This study was conducted in Cordoba (Spain).
Material and methods: A total of 1,597 cows from nineteen commercial dairy farms were involved in this study, of which twelve had CU barns and seven had DL barns. Welfare Quality assessment was used to evaluate animal wellbeing, inn order to compare both housing systems.
Main results: The study found some weaknesses for feeding and health indicators of animal welfare in both types of housing systems. The overall welfare assessment based on feeding, housing and health indicators showed no differences between farms with DL or CU barns.
Research highlights: A good welfare status could be reached under any type of housing system.
Downloads
References
Abeni F, Bertoni G, 2009. Main causes of poor welfare in intensively reared dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci 8: 45-66. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.45
Barberg AE, Endres MI, Salfer JA, Reneau JK, 2007. Performance and welfare of dairy cows in an alternative housing system in Minnesota. J Dairy Sci 90: 1575-1583. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71643-0
Bugueiro A, Pedreira J, Diéguez FJ, 2018. Study on the mayor welfare problems of dairy cows from the Galicia region (NW Spain). J Anim Behav Biometeorol 6: 84-89. https://doi.org/10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v6n3p84-89
Capdeville J, Veisser I, 2001. A method of assessing welfare in loose housed dairy cows at farm level, focusing on animal observation. Acta Agric Scand A Anim Sci 30: 62-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/090647001316923081
Cembalo L, Caracciolo F, Lombardi A, Del Giudice T, Grunert KG, Cicia G, 2016. Determinants of individual attitudes toward animal welfare-friendly food products. J Agric Environ Ethics 29: 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-015-9598-z
Cook NB, Nordlund KV, 2009. The influence of the environment on dairy cow behavior, claw health and herd lameness dynamics. Vet J 179: 360-369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.09.016
Croney CC, Botheras NA, 2010. Animal welfare, ethics and the U.S. dairy industry maintaining a social license to operate. Tri-State Dairy Nutr. Conf., Ohio (USA), Apr 20-21, pp: 51-55.
de Boyer des Roches A, Veissier I, Coignard M, Bareille N, Guatteo R, Capdeville J, Gilot-Fromont E, Mounier L, 2014. The major welfare problems of dairy cows in French commercial farms: an epidemiological approach. Anim Welfare 23: 467-478. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.4.467
Fregonesi JA, Leaver JD, 2001. Behavior, performance and health indicators of welfare for dairy cows housed in straw yard or cubicle systems. Livest Prod Sci 68: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00234-7
Fregonesi JA, Leaver JD, 2002. Influence of space allowance and milk yield level on behavior, performance and health of dairy cows housed in straw-yard and cubicle systems. Livest Prod Sci 78: 245-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00097-0
Grant RJ, 2004. Incorporating dairy cow behavior into management tools. Proc. Cornell Nutr. Conf. for Feed Manufacturers, Ithaca, NY (USA). pp: 65-76.
Haley DB, Rushen J, de Passille AM, 1999. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: Activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 71: 105-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00175-1
Hörning B, 2003. Attempts to integrate different parameters into an overall picture of animal welfare using investigations in dairy loose houses as an example. Anim Welfare 12: 557-563.
Husfeldt AW, Endres MI, Salfer JA, Janni KA, 2012. Management and characteristics of recycled manure solids used for bedding in Midwest free-stall dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 95: 2195-2203. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-5105
Little W, Collis KA, Gleed PT, Sansom BF, Allen WM, Quick AJ, 1980. Effect of reduced water intake by lactating dairy cows on behavior, milk yield and blood composition. Vet Rec 106: 547-551. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.106.26.547
Munksgaard L, Simonsen HB, 1996. Behavioral and pituitary adrenal-axis responses of dairy cows to social isolation and deprivation of lying down. J Dairy Sci 74: 769-778. https://doi.org/10.2527/1996.744769x
Oltenacu PA, Algers B, 2005. Selection for increased production and the welfare of dairy cows: are new breeding goals needed? Ambio 34: 4-5. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.4.311
Ostojic-Andric D, Hristov S, Novakovic Z, Pantelic V, Petrovic MM, Zlatanovic Z, Niksic D, 2011. Dairy cow's welfare quality in loose vs tie housing system. Biotechnol Anim Husb 27: 975-984. https://doi.org/10.2298/BAH1103975O
Phillips CJC, Schofield SA, 1994. The effect of cubicle and straw yard housing on the behaviour, production and hoof health of dairy cows. Anim Welfare 3: 37-44.
Popescu S, Borda C, Diugan EA, Spinu M, Groza IS, Sandru CD, 2013. Dairy cow's welfare quality in tie-stall housing system with or without access to exercise. Acta Vet Scand 55: 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0147-55-43
Popescu S, Borda C, Diugan EA, Niculae M, Stefan R, Sandru CD, 2014. The effect of the housing system on the welfare quality of dairy cows. Ital J Anim Sci 13: 2940. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2014.2940
Regula G, Danuser J, Spycher B, Wechsler B, 2004. Health and welfare of dairy cows in different husbandry systems in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med 66: 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.09.004
Rushen J, Haley D, de Passille AM, 2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. J Dairy Sci 90: 3647-3651. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-463
Steiger Burgos M, Senn M, Sutter F, Kreuzer M, Langhans W, 2001. Effect of water restriction on feeding and metabolism in dairy cows. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 280: R418-R427. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.2.R418
Trevisi E, Bionaz M, Piccioli-Cappelli F, Bertoni G, 2006. The management of intensive dairy farms can be improved for better welfare and milk yield. Livest Prod Sci 103: 231-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2006.05.009
Welfare Quality, 2009. Welfare quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Lelystad, Netherlands: Welfare Quality Consortium.
Zappavigna P, Lensink J, Flaba J, Ventorp M, Greaves R, Heiko G, Ofner-Schrock E, Ryan T, Van Gaenegem L, 2014. The design of dairy cow and replacement heifer housing. Report of the CIGR Section II Working Group. Commission Internationale du Génie Rural, 60 pp.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
