Comparison of different selection methods for improving litter size in sheep using computer simulation
Abstract
Aim of study: To assess selection methods via introgression to improve litter size in native and synthetic sheep breeds.
Area of study: Sanandaj, Kurdistan, Iran.
Material and methods: Selection approaches were performed using classical, genomic, gene-assisted classical (GasClassical) and gene-assisted genomic (GasGenomic) selection. Litter size trait with heritability of 0.1 including two chromosomes was simulated. On chromosome 1, a single QTL as the major gene was created to explain 40% of the total additive genetic variance. After simulation of a historical population, the animals from the last historical population were split into two populations. For the next 7 generations, animals were selected for favorable or unfavorable alleles to create distinct breeds of A or B, respectively. Then from the last generation, both males and females from breed B were selected to create a native population. On the other hand, males from breed A and females from breed B were mated to simulate a synthetic population. Finally, intra-population selections were carried out based on high breeding values during the last five generations.
Main results: The genetic gain in the synthetic breed was higher than that of the native breed under all selection methods. The frequencies of favorable alleles after five generations in the classical, genomic, GasClassical and GasGenoimc selection approaches in the synthetic breed were 0.623, 0.730, 0.850 and 0.848, respectively.
Research highlights: Combining gene-assisted selection with classical or genomic selection has the potential to improve genetic gain and increase the frequencies of favorable allele for litter size in sheep.
Downloads
References
Al-Mamun HA, Clark SA, Kwan P, Gondro C, 2015. Genome-wide linkage disequilibrium and genetic diversity in five populations of Australian domestic sheep. Genet Sel Evol 47: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0169-6
Bodin L, Martin PM, Raoul J, 2014. Effects of the FecL major gene on mean and variance of litter size in the Lacaune meat sheep population. Proc 10th World Conf on genetics applied to livestock production (WCGALP), Vancouver (Canada), Aug 17-22.
Daetwyler HD, Villanueva B, Bijma P, Woolliams JA, 2007. Inbreeding in genome-wide selection. J Anim Breed Genet 124: 369-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x
Davis GH, 2005. Major genes affecting ovulation rate in sheep. Genet Sel Evol 37: 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-37-S1-S11
Drouilhet L, Lecerf F, Bodin L, Fabre S, Mulsant P, 2009. Fine mapping of the FecL locus influencing prolificacy in Lacaune sheep. Anim Genet 40: 804-812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2009.01919.x
Duchemin S, Colombani C, Legarra A, Baloche G, Larroque H, Astruc JM, Barillet F, Robert-Granié C, Manfredi E, 2012. Genomic selection in the French Lacaune dairy sheep breed. J Dairy Sci 95: 2723-2733. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4980
Elsen JM, Bodin L, Francois D, Poivey JP, Teyssier J, 1994. Genetic improvement of litter size in sheep. Proc 5th World Conf on genetics applied to livestock production (WCGALP). Guelph, Ontario, (Canada), pp: 237-244.
Esfandyari H, Sorensen AC, Bijma P, 2015. Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 47: 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-015-0099-3
Fahmy MH, 1990. Development of DLS breed of sheep: genetic and phenotypic parameters of date of lambing and litter size. Can J Anim Sci 70: 771-778. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas90-096
Galloway SM, McNatty KP, Cambridge LM, Laitinen MP, Juengel JL, Jokiranta TS, McLaren RJ, Luiro K, Dodds KG, Montgomery G, 2000. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat Genet 25: 279-283. https://doi.org/10.1038/77033
Gaspa G, Veerkamp RF, Calu MPL, Windig JJ, 2015. Assessment of genomic selection for introgression of polledness into Holstein Friesian cattle by simulation. Livest Sci 179: 86-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.05.020
Gootwine E, Reicher S, Rozov A, 2008. Prolificacy and lamb survival at birth in Awassi and Assaf sheep carrying the FecB (Booroola) mutation. Anim Reprod Sci 108: 402-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.09.009
Gowane GR, Lee SH, Clark S, Moghaddar N, Al-Mamun HA, van der Werf JHJ. 2018. Effect of selection on bias and accuracy in genomic prediction of breeding values. bioRxiv 298042. https://doi.org/10.1101/298042
Hadfield JD, 2010. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33: 1-22.
https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v033.i02
Hanford KJ, Van Vleck LD, Snowder GD, 2005. Estimates of genetic parameters and genetic change for reproduction, weight, and wool characteristics of Rambouillet sheep. Small Rumin Res 57: 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.07.003
Hanrahan JP, Gregan SM, Mulsant P, Mullen M, Davis GH, Powell R, Galloway SM, 2004. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biol Reprod 70: 900-909. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.023093
Henderson CR, 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 31: 423-447. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529430
Hulet CV, Ercanbrack SK, Knight AD, 1984. Development of the Polypay breed of sheep. J Anim Sci 58: 15-24. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1984.58115x
Karimi K, Sargolzaei M, Plastow GS, Wang Z, Miar Y, 2019. Opportunities for genomic selection in American mink: A simulation study. PLOS ONE 14: e0213873. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213873
Kijas JW, Porto‐Neto L, Dominik S, Reverter A, Bunch R, McCulloch R, Hayes BJ, Brauning R, McEwan J, 2014. Linkage disequilibrium over short physical distances measured in sheep using a high‐density SNP chip. Anim Genet 45: 754-757. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12197
Martinez-Royo A, Jurado JJ, Smulders JP, Marti JI, Alabart JL, RocheA, Fantova E, Bodin L, Mulsant P, Serrano M, Folch J, Calvo JH, 2008. A deletion in the bone morphogenetic protein 15 genecauses sterility and increased prolificacy in Rasa Aragonesa sheep. Anim Genet 39: 294-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2052.2008.01707.x
Meuwissen THE, Hayes B, Goddard ME, 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157: 1819-1829.
Mishra AK, Arora AL, Kumar S, Prince LLL, 2009. Studies on effect of Booroola (FecB) genotype on lifetime ewe's productivity efficiency, litter size and number of weaned lambs in Garole × Malpura sheep. Anim Reprod Sci 113: 293-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.06.002
Mokhtari MS, Rashidi A, Mohamadi Y, 2010. Estimation of genetic parameters for post-weaning traits of Kermani sheep. J Anim Sci 80: 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2008.08.002
Ødegård J, Sonesson Ak, Yazdi MH, Meuwissen THE, 2009a. Introgression of a major QTL from an inferior into a superior population using genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 41: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-38
Ødegard J, Yazdi MH, Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE, 2009b. Incorporating desirable genetic characteristics from an inferior into a superior population using genomic selection. Genetics 181: 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.108.098160
Pedersen LD, Sørensen AC, Berg P, 2009. Marker-assisted selection can reduce true as well as pedigree-estimated inbreeding. J Dairy Sci 92: 2214-2223. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1616
Perez P, de los Campos G, 2014. Genome-wide regression and prediction with the BGLR statistical package. Genetics 198: 483-495. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.164442
Prieur V, Clarke SM, Brito LF, McEwan JC, Lee MA, Brauning R, Dodds KG, Auvray B, 2017. Estimation of linkage disequilibrium and efective population size in New Zealand sheep using three diferent methods to create genetic maps. BMC Genet 18: 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-017-0534-2
Pritchard JK, Przeworski M, 2001. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet 69:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1086/321275
Putz AM, Tiezzi F, Maltecca C, Gray KA, Knauer MT, 2018. A comparison of accuracy validation methods for genomic and pedigree-based predictions of swine litter size traits using Large White and simulated data. J Anim Breed Genet 135: 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12302
Rasali DP, Hrestha JNB, Crow GH, 2006. Development of composite sheep breeds in the world: A review. Can J Anim Sci 86: 1-24.
Sargolzaei M, Schenkel FS, 2009. QMSim: a largescale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics 25: 680-681. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp045
Souza C, MacDougall C, Campbell B, McNeilly A, Baird D, 2001. The Booroola (FecB) phenotype is associated with a mutation in the bone morphogenetic receptor type 1 B (BMPR1B) gene. J Endocrinol 169: R1-R6. https://doi.org/10.1677/joe.0.169r001
Toosi A, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM, 2010. Genomic selection in admixed and crossbred populations. J Anim Sci 88: 32-46. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-1975
Wang CL, Ding XD, Wang JY, Liu JF, Fu WX, Zhang Z, Yin ZJ, Zhang, 2013. Bayesian methods for estimating GEBVs of threshold traits. Heredity 110: 213-219. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2012.65
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
