Governance of knowledge and innovation in the Ibero-American agri-food system
Abstract
Aim of study: Governance and the knowledge and innovation system (KIS) are interrelated concepts. Knowledge management best practices are linked to KIS performance. This article explores the governance of the leading research, development, and innovation institutes in Ibero-American agriculture, food, and agro-industry sector. The paper reports mapping of the governance of 20 agricultural research institutes.
Area of study: Latin America and the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal.
Material and methods: In total, 51 strategic objectives for effective governance were identified. Self-evaluation by the National Agricultural Research Institutes (NARIs) was validated at a workshop backed by FONTAGRO, a cooperation mechanism amongst Latin American and the Caribbean countries, Portugal and Spain, and the Ibero-American Network of NARIs.
Main results: As a strength, the key dimension of NARIs appears to be coordination and cooperation. This result was acknowledged in the internal and external evaluations and supports previous research on the relevance of innovation networks in Latin America. By contrast, as a challenge, the key dimension appears to be demand articulation, followed closely by capacity building. Most of the institutes are also well-positioned to develop deeper ties with social and environmental challenges.
Research highlights: In the medium and long term, NARIs should make efforts to improve the processes of organizational evaluation and learning, demand articulation, and strategic direction of the institutions. Improvement in management processes, in addition to best practices for social responsibility and gender equality, appear to be short-term priorities.
Downloads
References
Bergek A, Jacobsson S, Carlsson B, Lindmark S, Rickne A, 2008. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Research Policy 37 (3): 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003
Borras S, 2009. The widening and deepening of innovation policy: what conditions provide for effective governance? (No. 2009/2). Lund University, CIRCLE-Center for Innovation, Research, and Competences in the Learning Economy.
Borrás S, Edler J (eds), 2014. The governance of socio-technical systems. Explaining change. Edward Elgar Publ, Cheltenham. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784710194
Borrás S, Edler J, 2020. The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation. Research Policy 49 (5): 103971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
Bortagaray I, 2016. Políticas de ciencia, tecnología, e innovación sustentable e inclusiva en América Latina. UNESCO, Oficina de Montevideo.
Braun V, Clarke V, 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2): 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Carayannis EG, Grigoroudis E, Campbell DF, Meissner D, Stamati D, 2018. The ecosystem as helix: an exploratory theory‐building study of regional coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems as quadruple/quintuple helix innovation models. R&D Manage 48(1): 148-162. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12300
Chema SG, Roseboom JE, 2003. A review of key issues and recent experiences in reforming agricultural research in Africa. Res Rep 24. ISNAR, The Hague.
Choi J, Lee J, 2017. Repairing the R&D market failure: public R&D Subsidy and the composition of private R&D. Research Policy 46 (8): 1465-1478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.009
Datta A, 2018. Strengthening research systems: concepts, actions, and actors, K4D Helpdesk Report. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton, UK.
David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA, 2000. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29: 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
Delvenne P, Thoreau F, 2017. Dancing without listening to the music: learning from some failures of the 'national innovation systems' in Latin America. In: Research handbook on innovation governance for emerging economies. pp: 37-58. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471911.00007
Devaux A, Torero M, Donovan J, Horton D, 2018. Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: a review. J Agribus Dev Emerg Econ 8 (1): 99-123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065
Díaz-Bonilla E, Saini E, Henry G, Creamer B, Trigo E, 2014. Global strategic trends and agricultural research and development in Latin America and the Caribbean: A framework for analysis. International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Cali, Colombia.
Dutrénit G, Natera JM, 2017. Procesos de diálogo para la formulación de políticas de CTI en América Latina y España. CLACSO, Buenos Aires.
Edler J, Fagerberg J, 2017. Innovation policy: what, why, and how. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 33 (1): 2-23. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Esquivel P, Orjuela A, Barros MP, Osorio C, 2017. Potential opportunities and challenges for research collaboration with Latin America in agriculture and food science. J Agr Food Chem 65 (37): 8096-8098. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03572
Francis JA, Van Huis A, 2016. Introduction. Why focus on innovation systems: implications for research and policy. In: Innovation systems, pp. 8-13. The Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA), Wageningen.
Geldes C, Heredia J, Felzensztein C, Mora M, 2017. Proximity as determinant of business cooperation for technological and non-technological innovations: a study of an agribusiness cluster. J Bus Ind Market 31 (1): 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2016-0003
Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE, 2011. Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publ, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436
Hartwich F, Alexaki A, Baptista R, 2007. Innovation systems governance in Bolivia: Lessons for agricultural innovation policies. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00732, December 2007. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
Havas A, Weber KM, 2017. The 'fit' between forward-looking activities and the innovation policy governance sub-system: A framework to explore potential impacts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 115: 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.07.016
Hillman K, Nilsson M, Rickne A, Magnusson T, 2011. Fostering sustainable technologies: a framework for analyzing the governance of innovation systems. Sci Publ Policy 38 (5): 403-415. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X12960315267499
Howlett M, 2009. Governance modes, policy regimes, and operational plans: A multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sci 42: 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9079-1
Jaramillo H, Lugones F, Salazar M, 2000. Normalización de indicadores de innovación tecnológica en América Latina y el Caribe: Manual de Bogotá, Doc. 21557, CO-BAC, Bogotá.
Kilelu CW, Klerk L, Leeuwis C, 2013. Unraveling the role of innovation platforms in supporting co-evolution of innovation: Contributions and tensions in a smallholder dairy development program. Agr Syst 118: 65-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2013.03.003
Lupova-Henry E, Dotti NF, 2019. Governance of sustainable innovation: Moving beyond the hierarchy-market-network trichotomy? A systematic literature review using the 'who-how-what' framework. J Clean Prod 210: 738-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.068
Marino M, Lhuillery S, Parrotta P, Sala D, 2016. Additionality or crowding-out? An overall evaluation of public R&D Subsidy on private R&D expenditure. Research Policy 45 (9): 1715-1730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.009
Mas-Verdu F, Ortiz-Miranda D, García-Álvarez-Coque JM, 2016. Examining organizational innovations in different regional settings. J Bus Res 69 (11): 5324-5329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.132
McCluskey JJ, 2019. Why diversity and expectations matter. Agr Econ 50: 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12530
OECD, 1999. Managing innovation systems. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/science/inno/2101733.pdf [March 2020].
Norton GW, 2011. Impact assessment of the IFPRI agricultural science and technology indicators (ASTI) project. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington DC.
Pound B, Conroy C, 2017. The innovation systems approach to agricultural research and development. In: Agricultural systems. Agroecology and rural innovation for development; Snapp S, Pound B (eds). Academic Press, Elsevier, London, pp: 371-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-802070-8.00011-6
Ruttan VW, 2001. Technology, growth, and development: an induced innovation perspective. Oxford Univ Press, NY.
Schot J, Steinmueller W, 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9): 1554-1567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
Spielman DJ, 2005. Innovation systems perspectives on developing-country agriculture: A critical review. ISNAR Discussion paper No. 591-2016-39898. Int Policy Res Inst, Washington DC.
Stads GJ, Beintema N, Pérez S, Flaherty K, Falconi C, 2016. Investigación agropecuaria en Latinoamérica y el Caribe. Un analisis de las instituciones, la inversion y las capacidades entre países. Inst Int Invest Pol Alim Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Washington DC:
Steurer R, 2007. From government strategies to strategic public management: an exploratory outlook on the pursuit of cross‐sectoral policy integration. Eur Environ 17(3): 201-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.452
UNDP, 2004. Strategy note on governance for human development. United Nations Development Program, New York.
Villalobos VM, García M, Avila F, 2017. La innovación para el logro de una agricultura competitiva, sustentable e inclusiva, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, San José. Fundación Colegio de Postgraduados en Ciencias Agrícolas, México.
Waddington H, White H, 2014. Farmer field schools: from agricultural extension to adult education, systematica review summary. Int Init for Impact Eval, Washington DC. https://doi.org/10.23846/SRS001ffs
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.
All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
